I filed a formal complaint against Mr. Mark Jason Mandilag, Duty Supervisor at Cebu Pacific–Iloilo, for unprofessional, intimidating, and disrespectful conduct toward my mother, OFW passenger Decerie Bornales, and her companion Remelyn Cablas during check-in for Flight 5J468 (Iloilo–Hong Kong) on January 22, 2026.
My mother and her companion politely requested to be seated together despite having separate bookings and expressed willingness to pay if required. Mr. Mandilag allegedly responded dismissively, ignored follow-up questions, spoke in a belittling and mocking manner, and deliberately separated their seats. His conduct caused humiliation and distress, particularly given my mother’s urgent and emotionally difficult circumstances involving a critically ill parent.
In addition, Mr. Mandilag failed to collect my mother’s OEC during check-in, a required procedure that was only corrected later by another staff member.
Mr. Mandilag denied the allegations, disputed the quoted statements, claimed the seats were automatically assigned by the system, and stated that policies were properly explained. His written responses were defensive and accusatory, questioned my credibility, and showed no empathy, accountability, or acknowledgment of passenger impact.
I clarified that the complaint is not about exact wording or dialect but about the tone, manner, and impact of the interaction. I emphasized that his continued lack of ownership and professionalism in his written replies reinforces the original concern. I also stated that this is not an isolated incident but raises concerns about a pattern of behavior that appears to be known internally.
I formally requested an independent and impartial investigation, including CCTV review, an evaluation of Mr. Mandilag’s conduct and suitability for a supervisory role, appropriate disciplinary or corrective action, and a formal apology. I made it clear that I will not withdraw this complaint, will not engage in further direct exchanges, and am prepared to pursue regulatory or legal remedies if the matter remains unresolved.
Desired outcome: Review written responses and emails; statements from nearby staff; evaluation of service standards, tone, and supervisory conduct; and assessment of any pattern or prior complaint
Confidential Information Hidden: This section contains confidential information visible to verified Cebu Pacific Air representatives only. If you are affiliated with Cebu Pacific Air, please claim your business to access these details.
To the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) – Legal Division,
I respectfully submit this Supplemental Manifestation to further clarify material facts relevant to the investigation of the incident involving Flight 5J468 and the subsequent communications arising from the complaint.
Limitations of CCTV Footage in Proving Discourtesy
Mr. Mandilag continues to rely on CCTV footage to deny the allegation of discourtesy. I respectfully manifest that the CCTV footage presented is silent and taken from a distant angle. As such, it is inherently incapable of capturing verbal abuse, tone of voice, manner of speech, or dismissive conduct. Discourtesy is a verbal and behavioral offense; it cannot be disproven by silent video footage alone.
Professional misconduct involving tone, language, and manner of address must be assessed based on witness statements, contemporaneous reactions, and corroborative admissions—not solely on visual recordings that omit audio context.
Subsequent Conduct Reinforcing the Original Complaint
After the incident, the station manager, Mr. Alfe V. Camposano, directly communicated with me through email using a similarly dismissive, aggressive, and confrontational tone. This subsequent interaction is relevant because it demonstrates that the discourteous behavior complained of was not isolated but reflective of a broader station culture and management attitude toward complainants.
Applicability of the Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)
While Mr. Camposano asserts that the Data Privacy Act shields his private communication, I respectfully clarify that RA 10173 is not a protection against accountability for professional conduct. Even in the private sector, Section 13(f) does not impose a requirement of “proportionality” as argued by him; rather, it requires relevance.
His statement, “I’m not surprised!”, is highly relevant as it constitutes an admission of prior awareness of the supervisor’s behavior. In Philippine jurisprudence, screenshots of digital communications obtained from one party to the conversation are admissible as evidence to establish the truth of an admission.
“Private Opinion” vs. Managerial Admission
Mr. Camposano characterizes his statement as a “private opinion” of a “third party.” Respectfully, this characterization is inaccurate. He is the Station Manager. His assessment of a subordinate’s conduct is a professional and managerial admission, not a casual personal remark.
When a manager admits he is not surprised by allegations of rudeness against a supervisor, such admission forms part of the Totality of Evidence under the Air Passenger Bill of Rights. It demonstrates management’s prior knowledge of a risk to passenger welfare and a failure to take corrective action.
On Allegations of Intimidation and Obstruction
Mr. Camposano states that he is not threatening or intimidating me, yet he continues to challenge the inclusion of factual evidence by invoking “legal rights” and urging exclusion of material that is unfavorable to the station. As a complainant, I have the right to submit any evidence that corroborates my claim.
Any attempt to pressure a complainant to “refocus” or withdraw damaging evidence is reasonably perceived as an effort to obstruct a transparent and impartial investigation.
Authorization of Disclosure
For the record, the screenshot was provided to me with the full knowledge, consent, and authorization of the recipient, Ms. Renee Rose Jamayo. This was a voluntary act by a witness to ensure that the Civil Aeronautics Board receives a complete and truthful account of the working environment and station culture.
In view of the foregoing, I respectfully submit that all previously attached communications remain part of the official record. I will not be withdrawing any evidence. I trust that the Civil Aeronautics Board will determine its relevance and evidentiary weight in accordance with law and established procedure.
Respectfully,
Rielyn Joy Bornales