Menu
Write a review
File a complaint
Sixt

Sixt review: The company charged me for damage on the rental car that existed when I rented the car.

M
Author of the review
8:22 pm UTC
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

I rented a car from SIXT Shlomo in Israel on July 7, 2026. At the time I picked up the vehicle and signed the rental agreement, I was provided with and signed a document titled “Car Review–Check Out.” This document contains a diagram of the vehicle identifying pre-existing damage with two red X marks. The areas marked as damaged include the front front-right sections of the vehicle.

I returned the vehicle five days later in the same condition in which I received it. Despite the fact that the damage had been clearly documented on the vehicle inspection form before I took possession of the car, SIXT subsequently claimed that the damage occurred during my rental period and charged me $1,167.

When I disputed the charge, I specifically provided the “Car Review–Check Out” document as evidence that the damage was pre-existing. The documentation directly contradicts SIXT’s claim that I caused the damage during my rental. Nevertheless, SIXT refused to reverse the charge or refund the money.

Claimed loss: $1,167

Confidential Information Hidden: This section contains confidential information visible to verified Sixt representatives only. If you are affiliated with Sixt, please claim your business to access these details.

View 0 more photos

0 comments

Add a comment

More Sixt reviews & complaints

Sixt - car rental 24
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
Sixt - overcharged 4
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
View all Sixt reviews and complaints