Chaturbate review: Sensuality is not compatible with human engineering on chaturbate

It is no wonder the owner is charitable towards feminist organizations. Chaturbate, like all streaming adult sites, is generally empowering for those who contain one of two female body parts. Conversely, men are treated like dirt. So I wouldn't recommend this site to aspiring male models ('femboy' or otherwise)...no matter how good you look there is no possible way you will succeed. Yes, The Internet rapidly accelerated neo-liberal exploitation of males through 'social media' which can easily be recoined 'social engineering'. No real loss, as Chaturbate have thoroughly excised anything organic, beautiful and playful from their site. Chaturbate bots now encourage everyone to 'shut up and pleasure yourself'. Dancing, singing, and saying 'bad' things will be met with a hard shadowban. Men, in particular, will find themselves talking to a grey bot from the time they start to the time they finish (just for being men). So why does Chaturbate even allow men to become 'models'? To facilitate ...ychological descent and keep them on there, where they can buy things to make them happy. In many ways, Chaturbate mirrors the trajectory of neo-liberalism which actively recoils from human nature as we knew it, profiting from a global demographic of 'incels' groomed on Omegle at an early age. This shall, perhaps, be their downfall as 'incels' tend not to be very thrifty. Sad. But the same can be said of all online Networks which used normal everyday people to build their platforms up, before becoming openly tyrannical, coercive, deceptive and exploitive. You save a lot of money when you don't have to produce shows. But now, with the ascension of the 'studio model', they (in a sense) can...similarly to how YouTube began monetizing wannabe 'influencers' willing to serve the always changing 'algorithm'. (Substitute 'algorithm' for 'curating'.) Unsurprisingly, this review (too) will be cancelled when the right funds are divvied to the respective gatekeepers. We are, indeed, the problem.