Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation Logo

Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation

Having problems with Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation?

File a complaint and get it resolved. It’s quick, effective and absolutely free!
Proudly resolving consumer concerns since 2004

Customer Service

500 Race Street, Apartment 4321
San Jose, California
United States - 95126-5159
Atherton, CA
190 El Camino Real, Atherton, CA 94027-3830
 
Mountain View, CA
1200 Dale Avenue, Suite 84, Mountain View, CA 94040-3327
 
Palo Alto, CA
884 College Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94306-1303
 
Dallas, TX
8650 Southwestern Boulevard, Suite 2715, Dallas, TX 75206-2683

Complaints & Reviews

hacker and online harassment and stalking

Aaron Greenspan a/k/a Aaron Jacob Greenspan owner of vicious monetized plainsite.org

Aaron Greenspan, his father Neil S Greenspan and his mother Judith Keene Greenspan all together have concocted this 501c tax evasion and tax fraud operation in which they hide their monetized websites such as leagle.com and plainsite.org under and this scam is called Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation and also Thinklink, Greenspan Technologies and many more front 501c tax fraud companies now based out of Delaware, so they can hide their identities and don
t have to disclose their monetized websites and don't have to turn in yearly earning reports.

There is no difference between street criminal and these individuals who have set up.an elaborate tax evasion and tax fraud and they are laundering money by using off shore banks, so they don't have to report their income to the IRS.

Neil S Greenspan is employed at Case Western University, where he makes every attempt to uphold his credibility.

Aaron Greenspan tries to make the public believe with his narrative that he is some sort of credible software programmer but in reality this is all a big scam, as he has never invented anything, he just steals the ideas from other people and twists and turns other people's ideas in to his own. This individual is a dangerous sociopath and since his parents are responsible for creating this 501c tac evasion and tax fraud scheme they are complete sociopath's who have enabled their sicko son Aaron Jacob Greenspan.

hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking
hacker and online harassment and stalking

  • Aa
    Aaron_Greenspan_Fraud Jun 24, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Aaron Greenspan plainsite.org plainsite . Neil Greenspan of case western reserve university and Judi Greenspan of keene promotions LLC are getting away by fooling the irs.

    Greenspans 501(c)3 non-profit organization called Think Computer Foundation is a scam.

    Read the article below. Greenspan fraud.

    Death of Aaron Swartz is causing outpouring of feelings (see story) never seen in decades and even the family is establishing foul play (see story). Now we are seeing financial support from the community of internet citizens.

    Aaron Greenspan, the entrepreneur and writer of the Lost Chapter an essay that tells the real story about the founding of Facebook, created a memorial grant of $10, 000 in the name of Aaron Swartz to promote more transparency. Greenspan has had his share of frustration both legally and personally watching all the players get rich at Facebook while he go zilch.

    http://www.aarongreenspan.com/writing/essay.html?id=83

    The grant in the name of Aaron Swartz will be from Greenspans 501(c)3 non-profit organization called Think Computer Foundation. Greenspan is also the founder of Facecash.com a new payment firm located in Palo Alto.

    Greenspan writes

    “Aaron Swartz’s work was very important to me, and as moving as the outpouring of grief over his death has been, the truth is that very few people paid serious attention to his work (excepting the DOJ and FBI) from the time he downloaded PACER data in 2008 until now. In fact, I am fairly certain that I can count on one hand the number of people who have spent considerable amounts of time thinking about PACER and its perverse impact on society.

    That needs to change, so I’ll pay to make it change. Exactly $10, 000 in Aaron’s name, from Think Computer Foundation, in the form of two Aaron Swartz Memorial Grants”

    Additionally I found some of Aaron’s recent writings called RawNerve written as series of of provocative essays. Located here online at http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/rawnerve

    8 Votes
  • Ma
    Masood 1 Aug 14, 2018

    I came across this podcast of Aaron Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan sounds voice sounds like a robot and seems like a sociopath. Aaron Greenspan sounds weird and angry.

    https://quoththeraven.podbean.com/e/quoth-the-raven-54-aaron-greenspan-creator-of-the-first-harvard-face-book/

    Quoth the Raven #54 - Aaron Greenspan, Creator of the First Harvard “Face Book”
    July 28, 2018
    Aaron Greenspan is the self-proclaimed missing piece from the Facebook story as it has been documented in films like "The Social Network". He joins me on my podcast to talk about his role in creating the first "Face Book", why he thinks Mark Zuckerberg is a "sociopath" and "threat to national security", Facebook's most recent scandal, the stock's recent plunge, and why he believes the number of Facebook fake accounts are understated.

    Aaron is an entrepreneur and engineer with a background in enterprise software. He is the President & CEO of Think Computer Corporation (http://www.thinkcomputer.com), as well as the founder of Think Computer Foundation (http://www.thinkcomputer.org), a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Aaron has worked on engineering problems involving accounting, payments, and legal systems, among others. Though not a lawyer, he has represented himself and his company before several state and federal courts, as well as the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

    Aaron has an A.B. in Economics from Harvard College and is the author of a memoir about his time there, during which he developed the predecessor to The Facebook.

    Aaron also contributes to legal website PlainSite. In addition to making huge volumes of data accessible to the public free of charge, PlainSite lets ordinary citizens impact the law-making process.

    Follow him on Twitter @PlainSite and @AaronGreenspan

    If you enjoy the QTR podcast - which will always be free - please consider an extremely small recurring donation through Patreon. My link is here. Thank you guys: https://www.patreon.com/QTRResearch

    All content created and owned by Quoth the Raven Research, LLC.

    All podcast content is subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.quoththeravenresearch.com/disclaimerterms-of-service/

    THIS IS NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE

    Disclosures: QTR has no position, Aaron owns Facebook puts

    Visit www.quoththeravenresearch.com for more on QTR.

    9 Votes
  • Pl
    Plainsite.org Plainsite Aug 16, 2018

    I saw this posted in other location. Business Insider stated Aaron Greenspan aka John Fuenchem is a parasite years ago. Also some more facebook leaked IMs. Sounds like plainsite.org court dockets are not worth trusting.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/parasite-the-aaron-greenberg-story-2009-5

    Facebook Settles With Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard Classmate
    Matt Mireles May 26, 2009, 2:19 PM
    facebook tbi
    Facebook has settled its trademark dispute with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's schoolmate Aaron Greenspan.
    In July 2006, Greenspan petitioned the US Patent & Trademark Office, asking that they revoke Facebook's trademark rights to "Facebook, " "Face Book, " "Universal Face Book" and "Face Net."

    Then -- and until now -- Aaron claimed that Mark Zuckerberg got his idea for Facebook and it's name only after the two had discussed plans for a project called "the Face Book" in 2003.

    We're not lawyers, but we're pretty sure Aaron never had much of a case. According to Harvard's Citizen Media Law Project:

    A trademark is a sign, mark, or indicator used by an individual, business, or organization to identity a product or service as its own and to distinguish the product or service from those of its competitors. A business name generally can be protected as a trademark under federal and state trademark law.

    Trademark law is designed to avoid consumer confusion over the trademarks that businesses or other organizations use in connection with their goods and services.

    To be eligible for protection, trademarks have to be either a) distinctive, or b) f amous. It may not have been in 2003, but by 2006, Facebook was definitely famous. That fame gives Facebook a very strong claim to the trademark. In legalese, they've built up mountains of "good will, " and with it, the attention (and lawsuits) of people like Greenberg.

    Comments

    10 Votes
  • In
    [email protected] @freelawproject sucks Aug 26, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Aaron Greenspan loser CEO of plainsite. (He calls himself CEO but has no employees lol )

    As you can see by the pictures, Aaron Greenspan is your typical loser dweeb who throws tantrum because he doesnt get his way. In a strange sort of way, Aaron Greenspan looks like Adam Lanza and David Katz. Free Law Project is afraid of Aaron Greenspan and have to give in.

    Simon Greenspan acts the same way. Only differences Aaron Greenspan has a mild form of autism .

    Keywords
    CaseText
    Commetric, Inc.
    Courthouse News
    FastCase
    ILS Technologies
    Justia
    Lawbox, Inc.
    Princeton University, Center for Information Technology Policy
    Public.Resource.Org
    Think Computer Foundation
    Unicourt
    University of Baltimore School of Law

    Siddharth Agrawal
    Jason Aller
    Philip Ardery
    Elliott Ash
    Frank Bennett
    Travis Briggs
    Ben Cassidy
    Ansel Halliburton
    Josh de-Larios Heiman
    Bo Jin (Krist)
    Deb Linton
    Andrew McConachie
    Rowyn McDonald
    Matt Meiske
    Taliah B. Mirmalek
    Peter Nguyen
    Karen Rustad
    Colin Starger
    Sarah Tyler
    Dave Voutila
    David Zvenyach

    11 Votes
  • Bc
    [email protected] Nov 20, 2018

    This guy is unstable.

    23 Votes
  • In
    Internal Auditors Feb 11, 2019

    @[email protected] Like highly volatile and out of his mind.

    14 Votes
  • Bc
    [email protected] plainsite Nov 23, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    New address to serve aaron greenspan

    956 CAROLINA ST
    SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107

    340 South LEMON AVE 6720
    WALNUT CA 91789

    21 Votes
  • Qu
    Qubescape scam Dec 09, 2018

    Trail of fraud and scams.

    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments

    27 Votes
  • No
    Nougat San Fran Dec 17, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is a sick Stalker. IRS is on this sheister!

    25 Votes
  • In
    Internal Auditors Feb 11, 2019

    We all know who the real Lauri.R.7 is. He is also bcboncs at Reddit.com, John Fuenchem who stalks the Board Members and all the followers of The Free Law Project and now this insane nut is stalking Diego Masmarques non-stop.
    Internal Revenue Service.

    12 Votes
  • Ja
    Jay Wal Apr 15, 2019

    @Internal Auditors We all know who the real Lauri.R.7 is. He is also bcboncs at Reddit.com, John Fuenchem who stalks the Board Members and all the followers of The Free Law Project and now this insane nut is stalking Diego Masmarques non-stop.
    Also two Twitter accounts @arongreenspan and @plainsite that we know of because for sure this Aaron Greenspan has many fake social media accounts all over the place. All the above accounts belong to Aaron Greenpsan.

    7 Votes
  • In
    Internal Auditors Feb 11, 2019

    Lauri.R.7 is a Psychotic Insane Nut

    11 Votes
  • Ju
    Julian Sacramento Mar 15, 2019

    User Lauri.R.7 is an alias for the Pscyo who is "bcboncs" on Reddit.com. "John Fuenchem" who harasses and stalks the Free Law Project.

    10 Votes
  • Ha
    Ha Ha! to Haters! Mar 21, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan suing The Free Law Project to try and get his $5, 000 from Mike Lissner and Brian Carver, as he cannot get anything else out of The Free Law Project. This small claims lawsuit was filed by Aaron Greenspan at the California Superior Court in Alameda, California on March 8, 2019. Case number is HS19010259 Think Computer Foundation vs. The Free Law Project from San Francisco, California.

    Aaron Greenspan gave the $5, 000 to The Free Law Project as a donation, in order to be able to access the public's legal dockets in bulk and then upload them on to his monetized website plainsite.org. He gives a donation of $5, 000 and now wants it back? Wonder what would happen if the public wanted all their donations back from Think Computer Foundation?

    Comments

    14 Votes
  • Ha
    Ha Ha! to Haters! Mar 21, 2019

    Worst thing the Free Law Project ever did is letting Aaron Greenspan in to their lives.

    14 Votes
  • Ha
    Ha Ha! to Haters! Mar 21, 2019

    Don't pay a penny!

    11 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron_Greenspan Mar 27, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    PEOPLE STILL REFER TO HIM AS THE NEXT UNABOBMER AND WISH HE WAS NEVER BORN BACK THEN .

    he says he was treated badly. As in, comments like, "you're the next Unabomber, " or, "I wish you had never been born" (ironically, of course, the open, freindly 'net can be very cruel as well).

    https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/The-Real-Face-of-Facebook.html

    The First Face of Facebook?
    By Scott Budman
    The First Face of Facebook?
    Facebook settles a lawsuit with Aaron Greenspan, who says he deserves some credit for the site's success.
    Aaron Greenspan could be where Mark Zuckerberg is sitting right now. When we caught up with him, in Palo Alto, he was staring at his computer, dialing up his Internet phone service to call a customer. But Greenspan is CEO of a small startup called Think Computer that he's currently operating out of his house. Mark Zuckerberg, of course, is CEO of social-networking juggernaut Facebook.

    The two are separated by about five miles, and roughly four billion dollars of paper net worth.

    It wasn't always this way. Greenspan and Zuckerberg were classmates at Harvard and took a 10-person computer science seminar together. They worked very closely for awhile, and that's where the problem comes in. Greenspan claims he came up with the initial idea (and term) for "Facebook, " and never got credit for it.

    At Harvard, Greenspan developed a website called HouseSystem. One of its key features: a "Universal Face Book." When Facebook tried to register a trademark for its name, Greenspan challenged it -- a move which sparked the now-settled lawsuit.

    Facebook Lawsuit [BAY] Facebook Lawsuit
    Talking to Greenspan, you get the feeling that he was probably willing to let bygones be bygones, and start his new company. But whenever he tried to even mention that he had a hand in Facebook, he says he was treated badly. As in, comments like, "you're the next Unabomber, " or, "I wish you had never been born" (ironically, of course, the open, freindly 'net can be very cruel as well).

    Nobody is talking details, but Greenspan and Facebook have, at long last, come to an agreement. Both are wishing each other well, although Greenspan says that, while Zuckerberg's number is "in my cell phone, " they still aren't talking. And, although Greenspan was one of the earliest people to sign up for Facebook, his profile has been down for a long time now (because of another disagreement), and he doesn't seem too desperate to bring it back up.

    I asked Greenspan if he would invest in Facebook. He says probably not, calling the business model "a bit risky."

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Go Go Rams! 22nd of Mar, 2019
    This guy is mentally disturbed and should be taking his medicine.

    Reply
    +1 Votes
    Pa Pamela lojesti 20th of Mar, 2019
    Loser lost his case against Google and was forced to return the money. ROFL

    Reply
    +5 Votes
    Nu Nus Padurti 19th of Mar, 2019
    HE SUED GOOGLE AND WAS EXPOSES FOR SELLING "COLLEGE ESSAYS"

    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/11/google_adsense_suit_redux/

    Google recaptures $761 from Facebook nemesis
    If you badmouth us, we'll play hardball
    By Cade Metz 11 Jun 2009 at 18:08 9 Reg comments SHARE ▼
    After it was successfully sued in small claims court by a man who says he invented Facebook, Google has appealed the decision, returned to court, and persuaded a judge to return its $761.

    In March, famous Facebook nemesis Aaron Greenspan sued Google in a North California court, claiming that Google terminated his AdSense account without explanation and failed to pay him the $721 he was owned for ad clicks on his website. A judge ruled in favor of Greenspan, awarding him the $721 plus $40 in court costs.

    As Greenspan says in a recent piece on The Huffington Post, a Google paralegal soon sent him an email indicating the Mountain View Chocolate Factory was poised to cut him a check. But after Greenspan recounted the suit and questioned the company's practices in an earlier Post post, Google decided to appeal.

    Apparently, Google succeeded in getting the ruling overturned. According to court papers, the company is no longer required to pay that $761.

    Aaron Greenspan first made headlines back in the fall of 2007 and the spring of 2008 after claiming that he created Facebook at Harvard - not Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and not the founders of ConnectU, who recently won a $60 million settlement in suing Zuckerberg and company for allegedly copying their idea.

    Advertisement

    And he's returned to the headlines with his Google suit. His original $761 went all the way to The New York Times.

    The way Greenspan tells it, Google terminated his AdSense account because he violated the company's terms of service, serving up ads from a site devoid of content and pointing surfers to those ads with the phrase "pick a link."

    Greenspan did indeed violate the terms of service. He doesn't deny it. But in typical Google fashion, this is Google choosing to crack down rogue ad partners only when it suits the company's immediate interests. As Greenspan points out, just two days after the company terminated his account, Google opened up its yes-we-do-evil AdSense for Domains service to world+dog.

    AdSense for Domains is meant specifically for parked domains - i.e. domains devoid of content. It's a haven for typosquatters.

    Meanwhile, in an effort to get its $761 back, Google's legal team resorted to a vague personal attack on Greenspan - according to Greenspan. Greenspan says that a Google lawyer questioned him about various essays posted to one of his website, implying he had sold them to cheaters:

    "Do you sell essays to college students?" the lawyer asked.

    "What?" I asked him, confused.

    "You sell pre-written essays for college students, right? Like term papers?"

    "No!" I said, finally realizing where he was going. "I don't know where you would have even gotten that idea." Little did he know that he had hit a sore spot, since I had recently written a book about education at America's "top schools" and the many problems therein, cheating among them.

    Though at that point I should have asked him how often he beat his wife, I was too shocked to think of it. Google has more access to information about people than virtually any company on the planet, yet despite its vast resources, it found it more prudent to fabricate disparaging innuendo about me before a judge.

    Advertisement

    In any event, it would appear that someone was so proud of Google winning its $761 back they sent a screenshot of Greenspan's terms of service violations to Search Engine Land.

    It's safe to say that Google doesn't want anyone else suing them over a terminated AdSense account. "What if everyone whose account was canceled sued Google?" that Google paralegal allegedly said when Greenspan first took the company to court.

    Reply
    +2 Votes
    Th Think Fraud suxcks 1st of Mar, 2019
    This airhead jerk is a convicted felon who's been in prison for extortion and stalking. He’s been taken to court for Domestic Violence (he beats up on his lover) and for Restraining Orders against him.

    He or IT is a scammer or a scam artist wannabe. Aroon runs a basic, run-of-the-mill “website” extortion scam. When he calls individual or business .(he purposely uses his personal phone number as his business phone number to catch people doing this) he claims that he personall information and he threatens to sue unless they pay him thousands of dollars. If the extortion doesn’t work and they don’t pay up, he sues them.
    Does the same thing with his website PLAINSITE.ORG . When somebody contacts him, he goes through the same routine, and he claims that whoever contacted him is harassing him, or violating his "rights, " or cyberstalking him, or violating the "Terms of Agreement" for his website, or some such nonsense, and then he goes through the same extortion routine. Not very imaginative, but it works until the scammer gets greedy.

    In the meantime he harasses threatens, bullies, and intimidates his victims with letters, phone calls, emails, and text message, and he extorts and stalks his victim until they pay up.

    Many his lawsuits are against people and businesses who wouldn’t pay his extortion money. The ones who ultimately give in to the jerks extortion demands don't pay up because they necessarily broke the law - as naturally claims - but because it's cheaper to pay off Aroon than to hire a lawyer and go to court. He knows that, and uses it to his advantage, sometimes suing dozens of people in the same lawsuit, knowing that at least a few of them will pay up, and he can use the money to victimize MORE people. He sued every company in silicon valley. He also sued pacer.com to get free personal court records.

    By the way he claim that every single one has paid and paid and paid is a lie, of course. It's a simple matter to check the court records to see that many of his intended victims HAVEN'T "paid and paid and paid." The jerk is just trying to make his victims and potential victims think he always wins, so they should pay up. He also likes to talk himself up. In his world, he's the best, and the smartest, and the cleverest. He is the Donald Trump of the wannabe scammers.

    Greenjerk trolls consumer complaint websites like this one, and he uses his lawsuits to issue subpoenas . like he claims to have done here - "The subpoenas are being sent out every day) to find out the personal information of people who criticize him or tell the truth about him. He cries and whines like he's a victim, then he victimizes them the same way he victimizes people in hia website scams - he libels them, calls them names, threatens to send them to jail, and otherwise tries to bully and intimidate them into paying his extortion demands. He also likes to throw around references to Federal and California law -- "47 UC section 5001...47 USC 22567...CA Penal Code 633554662 and 6337.2 - thinking that will intimidate people. He thinks he is a lawyer until he got kicked out of Stanford his felony . It's just a matter of time before he goes back to jail and everything he writes on consumer websites and in his messages and emails puts him just a little bit closer to the pokey. A true scam artist wouldn't boast online about his scams and victims like he does. This is one of the reasons that I and people like me post about him on websites. We want to keep him talking, because his ego is so big and he’s too stupid to know when to shut up, and in between the lies and the threats, and the false bravado to talk himself up, he always gives something away that we can use against him.

    As usual, consider the source of the ranting and raving. He is being a sociopath (maybe a psychopath), felon ex-con, extortionist, stalker, scam artist wannabe with a massive ego and serious anger and self-esteem issues who is on his to jail. This guy is very dangerous slime snake.

    Reply
    +5 Votes
    Mi Micky Campbell, Cal 22nd of Mar, 2019
    @Think Fraud suxcks What prison? Details?

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Te Tesla Employee cali 26th of Feb, 2019
    OMG This is the guy who has been stalking the Tesla dealership I work at. The weirdo comes everyday wearing different disguises and hides behind cars. He dresses in drag to disguise sometimes. I thought his boyfriend works at the dealer at that is why he spends 5 hours a day.

    I finally walked up and asked him why he was stalking the dealership. He gave me his business card and I just googled up. This guy has a crazy look in his eyes and I feared my safety. Sometimes he wears a treach coat like he is inspector gagent. He asks the dumbest questions.

    Reply
    +5 Votes
    Pl @plainsite scam 19th of Feb, 2019
    Aaron Greenspan has never held an honest job in his life. Aaron Greenspan failed stanford code x and was kicked out. Aaron Greenspan is an accomplished extortionist and makes a career harassing people for money and filing frivolous law suits to provide him with income. He is a pathological liar and he harassing people with vulgar and disgusting emails and social media filled with untrue statements to extort his target with his website www.plainsite.org and Think Computer Foundation. DR. Neil S Greenspan of case western reserve university groomed him into this Monster at the tender age of 4.

    He drives a car with no insurance, suspended license and no registration. Aaron Greenspan uses alias names and addresses around the country. Aaron Greenspan always rents out a room and never has his own apartment or place.
    Aaron Greenspan loves "pitting people" against each other and creating smear campaigns. Just like he has done with facebook. He acts without empathy when attacking so beware. Aaron Greenspan is a dangerous individual so beware if he crosses your path and thinks you have money he will target you to extort you.

    956 Carolina Street
    San Francisco, CA 94107
    415-670-9350 [protected]@post.harvard.edu
    @plainsite
    @aarongreenspan
    Aarongeeenspan.com

    20560 SHELBURNE ROAD
    44122 Shaker Heights
    Ohio
    And
    956 CAROLINA STREET
    SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
    And
    340 S. LEMON AVENUE #6720
    WALNUT CA 91789.
    And
    2575 E Camelback Rd #870, Phoenix, AZ 85016

    (216) 932-1989

    Reply
    +7 Votes
    Ex Extortionist dweeb 19th of Feb, 2019
    This clown is crazy. Wow.

    Reply
    +3 Votes
    Ex extortionist suck 16th of Feb, 2019
    Pathological lier is tried to extort $10, 000 a day. He is a bully!! He needs to be locked up and stop the harrassment.

    Reply
    +7 Votes
    Fr Fraud scam chairty 15th of Feb, 2019
    Plainsite chairty fraud addresses. 956 Carolina Street San Francisco CA 94107

    Reply
    +5 Votes
    Ju Jug Jake 15th of Feb, 2019
    Fraudulent chairty to avoid IRS and harrass the public.

    Reply
    +4 Votes
    Tu Turing Investments scam 13th of Feb, 2019
    The address
    500 Race Street, Apartment 4321
    San Jose, CA
    United States - 95126-5159 is old.

    New address here.

    20560 SHELBURNE ROAD
    44122 Shaker Heights
    Ohio
    And
    956 CAROLINA STREET
    SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
    And
    340 S. LEMON AVENUE #6720
    WALNUT CA 91789.
    And
    2575 E Camelback Rd #870, Phoenix, AZ 85016

    Reply
    +4 Votes
    Ti [email protected] 5th of Feb, 2019
    This is truly a disturbed individual.

    Reply
    +11 Votes
    Jo Joey Ovir 31st of Dec, 2018
    956 CAROLINA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 scam.

    Reply
    +35 Votes
    Cu Curt Hegeget 31st of Dec, 2018
    Having a fraud charity doesn't give you a license to harrass innocent people.

    Tax Period Asset Income Revenue
    December, 2013 $0 $0 $0
    December, 2015 $0 $0 $0
    December, 2016 $0 $0 $0
    December, 2017 $0 $0 $0

    956 CAROLINA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107

    5 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron_Greenspan Mar 27, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    He has harrased and victimised us for years.There are numerous storys on him if you google his name.Even though he has pleaded guilty to it all he still has the nerve to deny it.You are a liar who should be in prison where you belong instead of of harrassing and trying to destroy peoples lives whose path you cross.Ihave decided to add some links here so the public are aware of how much of a liar he really is.This links are from his last court case where he pleaded guilty

    If someone put this sociopath out of business personally, I would buy them a drink. These scums ought to be run out of town or put in jail. P.S. It's so obvious that he posts on this site. it's not even funny, it's just sad and pathetic.

    12 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron.Greenspan stalker Apr 04, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    If you get any email from the nutcase Aaron Greenspan or Neil S Greenspan case western reserve University or Judi keene Greenspan IGNORE IT AT ALL COSTS! He is an obsessive/compulsive stalker who will hound you mercilessly until you have to file a police report or report it to his email provider. He is an unemployed, uneducated loser who fixates on anyone on the internet he disagrees with and hassles them in a teruly childish, immature, psychologically unbalanced way. So BEWARE.If he contacts you, report it to the police or his service provider immediately...otherwise, he may show up at your home (he did at ours and we had him arrested)!

    8 Votes
  • El
    Elijah J Apr 04, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan is a Narcissistic Egomaniac Sociopath and this guy cannot be helped as he is too far gone.

    Aaron Greenspan had his father form Think Computer Foundation and Think Computer Corporation and monetized websites like plainsite.org are not supposed to under this fraudulent 501(c)(3) Think Computer Foundation.

    Check out all these lies and scams to not pay taxes and con the public.

    These papers were sent to the IRS to form this tax fraud.

    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments

    8 Votes
  • Be
    Beast of Light Apr 04, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan refuses to stop his harassment of the public and refuses to stop collecting people's legal documents and then posting them on his monetized website plainsite.org for his harassment and money making purposes. The anger that this individual displays against people is most likely because he has failed at ever single endeavor and just cannot understand why he cannot be rich and famous. This is important to this superficial child Aaron Greenspan but because of the many defects in his character being unethical, immoral and a jealous hater it will always be impossible for this guy to go anywhere and he will always be caught in a endless cycle of misery and anger. It is too late for this guy to change but one of the ways he can change course is to leave the public alone and close down plainsite.org and find some other type of hobby to make money.
    בְּלִיַעַל‎

    3 Votes
  • Go
    Google vic Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Looks like a hit a nerve whth posted details of Aaron Jacob Greenspan.

    Let me introduce Aaron Greenspan @plainsite to you. He's a conman, a pervert and a pedophile who likes to hound and harasses people who talk about him by sticking the cops on them .

    He is a fraud who used to work at facebook.

    11 Votes
  • Lo
    Lock up the crazies Apr 18, 2019

    @Google vic Zuck just ignores this guy like one of those pesky fruit flies that you just don't no from where it came from and it just keeps coming back to be pesky. Zuck has lots of security personnell and spends around $20, 000 a month on body guards. One reason is that he fears this Aaron Greenspan who is stalking him and moved from Ohio to California close to his company in Palo Alto at first and is always monitoring what Zuck is doing and always throwin in his two cents about what either Zuck does or doesn't do and the reality is nobody cares what this guy says or makes comments about. People just want this stalker to leave them alone and he doesn't get it.

    7 Votes
  • Pl
    @plainsite.org Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    FRAUD In Louisiana

    Name Type City Status
    THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION Business Corporation (Non-Louisiana) WILMINGTON Inactive

    Previous Names
    Business: THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION
    Charter Number: 40631256F
    Registration Date: 10/4/2011
    Domicile Address
    CORPORATION TRUST CENTER
    1209 ORANGE STREET
    WILMINGTON, DE 19801
    Mailing Address
    884 COLLEGE AVENUE
    PALO ALTO, CA 94306
    Principal Business Office
    884 COLLEGE AVENUE
    PALO ALTO, CA 94306
    Registered Office in Louisiana
    3867 PLAZA TOWER DR., 1ST FLOOR
    BATON ROUGE, LA 70816
    Principal Business Establishment in Louisiana
    3867 PLAZA TOWER DR., 1ST FLOOR
    BATON ROUGE, LA 70816
    Status
    Status: Inactive
    Inactive Reason: WITHDREW
    Qualified: 10/4/2011
    Last Report Filed: 10/2/2012
    Type: Business Corporation (Non-Louisiana)

    Registered Agent(s)
    Agent: THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION
    Address 1: 884 COLLEGE AVENUE
    City, State, Zip: PALO ALTO, CA 94306
    Appointment Date: 7/15/2013

    Officer(s) Additional Officers: No
    Officer: AARON GREENSPAN
    Title: President
    Address 1: 884 COLLEGE AVENUE
    City, State, Zip: PALO ALTO, CA 94306
    Officer: NEIL GREENSPAN
    Title: Vice-President, Secretary
    Address 1: 20560 SHELBURNE ROAD
    City, State, Zip: SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122
    Officer: RONALD ROSEN
    Title: Director
    Address 1: 1022 MILL ROAD CIRCLE
    City, State, Zip: RYDAL, PA 19046

    Amendments on File (2)
    Description Date
    Withdrawal Pending 12/27/2012
    Withdrawal 7/15/2013

    Comments

    10 Votes
  • Re
    Remove my profile now Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Remove my profile now
    SUBMIT A COMPLAINT

    Internet Services Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation Customer Service aaron jacob greenspan posting personal and private information on his website.
    Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation / aaron jacob greenspan posting personal and private information on his website.
    1
    500 RACE STREET, SUITE 4321, San Jose California 95126, San Jose, CA, United States
    Review updated: Apr 5, 2019
    179 comments
    Contact information:
    Phone: 415-670-9350
    plainsite.org
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is the owner of the website www.plainsite.org. He posts personal and private information on his website. He refuses to take down the information. I am a victim of domestic violence and my personal information is NOT suppose to be online per court orders. Aaron Greenspan refuses to remove my information from his website. He disrespects the law.

    I begged him to remove it because I don't want my ex to find me. He refused to remove it. My ex found me and children in our home were harmed and I was beat up to a bloody pulp after he found me on Aaron's website www.plainsite.org.

    Aaron Greenspan doesn't care about hurting children. He posts the locations of children whose mothers are hiding from abusive relationships.

    He refuses to remove the information. He profits from watching people suffer and get beat up to a bloody pulp.

    He runs his website out of a rented apartment all by himself. He's a lonely man. He hates people, so he uses his website to hurt them by posting their personal and private lives.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a bad person. Here are his other websites.
    http://www.plainsite.org
    http://www.aarongreenspan.com/

    Here is the address which was taken from California San Jose Secretary of State website.

    Updated by Myname2017, Feb 28, 2017
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is the website owner. He runs the website out of his rented apartment he lives in by himself. He downloads federal lawsuits from Pacer and puts them on his website to humiliate people while he makes money from their names with advertisement.

    Aaron posted on his website all my personal and private information. Through his opt out link, I asked him to remove my information, but he refused. So I called him and asked him. He then yelled at me and refused to remove it and then he slammed the phone in my face.

    I lost several job offers because of his website giving my personal life. He makes his living by hurting innocent people on his website.

    How would he like it if somebody posted his personal life? He doesn't care about people.

    Updated by Myname2017, Feb 28, 2017
    I posted his pictures of him in the red shirt so you can see who he is.

    My Myname2017 Feb 28, 2017
    More Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation Complaints & Reviews
    Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation - plainsite.org under fraudulent 501c think computer [censor] father neil s greenspan is the vp and treasurer [254]
    Neil S Greenspan VP and Treasurer for plainiste.org under fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer - hacking in to state and federal databases to download sealed and sensitive information [100]
    Aaron Greenspan, Judith Greenspan, Neil Greenspan, Plainsite.org, Complaint - aaron greenspan, judith greenspan, neil greenspan, plainsite.org, complaint [90]
    Aaron Sociopath Greenspan plainsite.org - plainsite.org under illegal 501c think computer his father neil sociopath greenspan is the vp and treasurer [50]
    www.plainsite.org - They posted wrong details about me. They ruined my life [50]
    Aaron Greenspan Plainsite org Think Computer Foundation pacer.com - pacer law dockets [12]
    Plainsite.org / Think Computer Corporation - aaron greenspan [20]
    plainsite.org Think Computer Foundation Fraudulent 501c3 Tax Evasion Scammers - data mining, making money off of the public's "dirty laundry" legal documents. [9]
    Aaron Greenspan, Neil Greenspan, Judi Greenspan, plainsite.org, think computer, IRS fraud - aaron greenspan, neil greenspan, judi greenspan, plainsite.org, think computer, irs fraud [13]
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan, Neil S Greenspan & Judith Keene Greenspan owners of 501c(3) Tax Fraud Think Computer Corporation - uploading people's personal legal documents in a selective manner for the sole purpose of these owners of leagle.com and plainsite.org to make money [45]
    Sort by: UpDate | Rating
    Comments
    Na Nancy L Loves Tesla 29th of Mar, 2019
    Aaron Greenspan has some sort of Spectrum disorder and is mentally not all there. He has lost every single lawsuit ad every single small claims case. He is burnt out and a jealous hater. He will never be a Mark Zuckerberg or anyone of success in his lifetime. He will remain a lowly hanger-on who moved to California to hang on to the successful people and is so nuts that he doesn't even realize that he is nuts and is a serious stalker. Its only a matter of time before this guy is either admitted to a Psychiatric facility or a prison. He does not belong in society and is a serious danger to the public. Currently he is stalking Elon Musk and the Tesla Dealerships. My friend works at one where he showed up acting like an insane person asking all kinds of stupid questions and acting like he was high and mighty. Right away my friend could tell that he's not all there in the head. She could just look in this guys eyes and see that he's too far gone for even some sort of Pscyh treatment. California Law Enforcement needs to have this guy arrested or committed before he hurts someone.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Dw Dwanye Alert Fraud 30th of Mar, 2019
    FRAUD ALERT!!! SCAM ALERT!!!

    340 S. LEMON AVENUE #6720 WALNUT CA 91789 belongs to po box . The forms stated DO NOT INCLUDE PO BOX.

    Think Computer Corporation DID NOT HAVE BUSINESS LICENSE IN 2017 AND 2007 to 2015.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ma Mark JK 31st of Mar, 2019
    Aaron Greenspan is harassing the hell out of some guy named Diego Masmarques. He is not even uploading the attachments to the case. He's trying control the narrative.

    I just sent in one of those IRS Referral Forms 13909 to Dallas, Texas, as this guy is crazy stubborn and has refused to remove my personal information. He needs to close Plainsite.org completely down and leave the public alone. People are going to start fighting back and getting more Restraining Orders against this loser.

    Reply
    +2 Votes
    Ma Mark JK 31st of Mar, 2019
    I'm going to show up at this next court hearing on May 2, 2019 at 1:30pm and be a witness for Diego Masmarques as I am being harassed to no end by this Aaron Greenspan. He refuses to leave the public alone. I'm going to take some legal action as well and file for a Restraining Order in my county here in California and download these documents to use in my case against Aaron Greenspan.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Fr Free.law victim 3rd of Apr, 2019
    www.Free.law.com is just another victim of the pathological liar mental case extortionist.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Aa Aaron.Greenspan stalker 4th of Apr, 2019
    Aaron Greenspan, the extortion fake standard code x lawyer is at it again. He is now suing anything that mentions a TRADEMARKED name.

    A little more research, taking to people who know Aaron Greenspan shows he has psychopathic tendencies and will try to extort money from anyone as long as he thinks he can get away with it.

    Reply
    +2 Votes
    El Elijah J 4th of Apr, 2019
    plainsite.org needs to be shut down and the founder Neil S Greenspan who is the VP and Treasurer and mastermind has his son Aaron Greenspan who appears to be mentally off as the CEO of Think Computer Foundation and Think Computer Corporation to hide his bad unethical behaviors from his employer Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.

    These people are really unethical and immoral people who tell lots of lying tales.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ga Gabriella T 21 hrs 29 mins ago
    Aaron Greenspan suing everybody in plain site. This guy takes the cake for being the crazy litigious person who just doesn't quit with this insanity.

    Why is Aaron Greenspan living in California anyway? Most likely so he can try and get a piece of the action that he feels he is entitled to and to get this he will sue, sue and sue. He is still stalking Mark Zuckerberg after all these years and now he is stalking Elon Musk. What is going on with this guy? Can somebody please get this guy to some sort of anti-stalking treatment.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ga Gabriella T 21 hrs 24 mins ago
    This Aaron Greenspan posted some old bs legal case on my sister and she lost her job. What in the world is this guy doing to people? Here is some case that he lost in San Francisco where he was trying to beat some parking ticket. He lost!

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ga Gabriella T 21 hrs 11 mins ago
    Aaron Greenspan vs. City and County of San Francisco

    The court found that the City of San Francisco does not owe Aaron Greenspan any money.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ga Gabriella T 20 hrs 54 mins ago
    This is just beyond belief?

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ma Mark Zuckerberg wanna be 17 hrs 22 mins ago
    @Gabriella T The dweeb lost in traffic court and then lied in small claims court that the judge awarded him. This is unbelievable and EXtortion. He tried to fool small claims court that he was owed a refund. YOU BELONG IN MENTAL HOME YOU DWEEB.

    Reply
    +2 Votes
    Ga Gabriella T 20 hrs 42 mins ago
    What is going on with this guy?

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ma Mark Zuckerberg wanna be 17 hrs 29 mins ago
    @Gabriella T The so called father of Facebook sued over getting his car towed. This guy is a loooooser and mental patient. Learn how to read a sign you dweeb!!

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Ma Mark Zuckerberg wanna be 17 hrs 27 mins ago
    @Mark Zuckerberg wanna be Has anyone seen the one when he was a mental patient at Kaiser?? He sued once he got released.

    Reply
    0 Votes
    Re Remove my profile now 0 mins ago
    Do not ever pay plainsite.org. They are the rudest, most unprofessional owners you can come across! They rip you off and steal your money! I paid to remove my name from google search engines and plainsite. The guy aaron who talked like a mental patient Non stop.To the point that I thought he was mentally challenged and turns out he is the owner... Along with his boyfriend
    I paid my $4400 cash fee. I was told it would be removed but never did. I very politely informed aaron that my court case is still up d and the owner lost it! he became very belligerent and blamed me. said it was my fault, not theirs, and went on and on scolding me (Half of which I could not understand because he speaks like a autistic roboot)... Then told me he didn't like my attitude . I asked how it is that "i" had an attitude by complaining and she began yelling at me and told me "tough luck for you! I am keeping your money! Good luck trying to get your $ back! there was no reasoning with him because he is completely crazy. I tried speaking calmly to his husband (The othet mentally challenged man) because it was just bizarre that anyone would treat a person like that or react so hostile and crazy, but he too started yelling and said "don't blame us. You chose to sue and public domain. so I did what any sane person who is dealing with two unprofessional, old and crazy people would. I left without my money. He angry drag queen.

    6 Votes
  • Re
    Remove my profile now Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Sick angry drag queen [email protected]@@@@@

    9 Votes
  • We
    We love Santa Cruz Apr 10, 2019

    The next court date for the Restraining Order against Aaron Greenspan is on May 2, 2019 at 1:30pm at the Santa Clara Superior Court, San Jose, California. We are going to show up as witnesses against Aaron Greenspan and cannot wait to let the Judge know about all the harassment and stalking this insane guy has done to our family. We are going to serve Aaron Greenspan legal papers on this date.

    7 Votes
  • Ja
    Jay Wal Apr 15, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan did not invent House System. We allowed him to participate in the coding of House System but when we noticed he was being sneaky and trying to do things out of loop we made him take a hike. Since then he's been like a maniac trying to sue the whole world to get a hand out. He even moved out to California from Ohio just to stalk and sue everyone in his path. We knew it back in the day that something was off with this guy and over time he has just proved to the whole world that he is not all there.

    7 Votes
  • Lo
    Lock up the crazies Apr 18, 2019

    Look what we found! We need to find out how many criminal charges Aaron Greenspan has faced throughout the USA even if they were dismissed there is a pattern here and sooner or later criminal charges will stick to this crazy guy.

    Both Aaron and Siomon where staying in https://waterfallcanyon.com for the mentally challenged. 801.621.3901 we spoke to officials at the home. They stated Greenspan's had filed frivolous lawsuits accusing the home of trying to murder Simon. THIS IS NOT A JOKE.
    3375 Harrison Blvd, Ogden, UT 84403

    We are going to finally get in contact with Eric Ersepke (216) 938-8243
    20540 Shelburne Rd, Shaker Heights OH to be a character witness of the Greenspan harrassment and public shaming game.

    We need assistance in reaching out to Chief Scott Lee and Mayor Earl Williams.

    Criminal complaints where brought against Greenspan's but dismissed.

    6 Votes
  • Ji
    Jillian Bott Apr 24, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan thinks he can lie and cheat and always get his way. This idiot took millions of names and posted their dirt on plainsite.org but the loser got upset when his data is posted on other sites.
    Aaron Greenspan 956 Carolina Street San Francisco, CA 94107 Phone: +1 415 670 9350 Fax: +1 415 373 3959 E-Mail: [email protected]

    Stephen Chaitin
    (415) 308-7836

    20560 SHELBURNE ROAD
    44122 Shaker Heights
    Ohio
    And
    956 CAROLINA STREET
    SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
    And
    340 S. LEMON AVENUE #6720
    WALNUT CA 91789.
    And
    2575 E Camelback Rd #870, Phoenix, AZ 85016

    (216) 932-1989

    Comments

    9 Votes

private and unauthorized information is being published on his website

Private and unauthorized information is being published on http://plainsite.org website. This website should be immediately removed. It is causing and effects people who don't want their information to be published online and searched over google and picked up by other search engines. There should be permission to do that. I don't want my name to appear in google, never gave permission. It's unsafe, unethical and ruining people's private lives.

  • Ve
    Veronica Ll Apr 11, 2019

    Sign up for a free account with Pacer it's a million times better than plainsite.org will ever be and you can see all the crazy lawsuits by Aaron Greenspan. He sues so much it can make your head spin. This guy is totally insane.

    12 Votes
  • An
    Ann Romney Apr 29, 2019

    TERRELL WOODS 1Uncaptioned photo
    Dropping the H-Bomb

    When “An Expensive Education”, a novel by Nick McDonell ’06-’07 came out this summer, Harvard was, once again, fictionalized and

    by CHELSEA L. SHOVER Sep 22, 2009
    When “An Expensive Education”, a novel by Nick McDonell ’06-’07 came out this summer, Harvard was, once again, fictionalized and seen anew through the eyes of a recent graduate.

    But while McDonell explained that his focus was on writing an engaging spy novel rather than on representing the setting where so much of the novel unfolds, a number of young authors who choose to write about Harvard instead decide to incorporate the institution into their own stories.

    “Having a bad depression and getting help and medication happens all over the place, but the specifics are really important, ” says Elizabeth Wurtzel, author of Prozac Nation, a memoir of her depression that began when she was eleven or twelve and unfolded throughout her undergraduate years. “I’m not sure if I would have been able to write the book and get it published if it didn’t take place at Harvard, ” Wurtzel says. “People are always curious about the place.”

    Although many such memoirs are not about Harvard per se, the name and place are tied inextricably to the stories, and the memoirists would argue they couldn’t be set anywhere else.

    WHAT KIND OF 25-YEAR-OLD WRITES A MEMOIR?

    “If you write a memoir, particularly at a young age, there has to be something unique about your experience, ” says Ruben Navarrette Jr. ’89-’90, who arrived in the Yard as one of 35 Mexican Americans in the class of 1989, five years before the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies was founded.

    Navarrette left Harvard when he was 23 and decided to write his memoir just one year after graduating. By the time he was 26, his book, “A Darker Shade of Crimson: Odyssey of a Harvard Chicano”, had been published. He described the writing process as “cathartic” and explained his decision to pen the memoir so soon out of college.

    “The emotions coming out of college were still pretty raw, ” says Navarrette, “It was a very effective way, I think, to transition out of college and into the workforce and into what became a career as writer and journalist.”

    While Navarrette explored his ethnicity to cast a unique spin on the Harvard experience, Lauralee Summer ’98 also seized upon her unusual path to Harvard in writing her memoir.

    When Summer was making a name for herself in high school wrestling, reporters started asking her about her family background. She talked about how growing up she and her mom sometimes lived in homeless shelters, moving 20 times before she was 12 years old. Soon, she was making headlines as “Homeless to Harvard.”

    “A lot of people, I think, had the perception [that] if you work really hard, you could overcome poverty, and anyone could go from being homeless to Harvard, and therefore the American dream was awesome and working for everyone, ” Summer says. And so, Summer, the first woman to join Harvard’s varsity wrestling team, decided that if anyone was going to tell her story, it should be her.

    “I felt like I had had a lot of lucky events in my life and a lot of people who cared about me. That was part of the reason that I made it from one place to another. That was the story I really wanted to write.”

    And she wanted to do it right away. “I felt like it would be a different story if I waited a long time, ” she says, “I wanted to do it while it was fresh.” She first wrote “Learning Joy From Dogs Without Collars” as a creative thesis, and her adviser recommended the manuscript to a publisher.

    Elizabeth L. Wurtzel ’89, the author of “Prozac Nation, ” initially set about to write an article for New York Magazine in honor of the 350th anniversary of the University about what Harvard was really like. While the 20, 000 word piece was never published, Wurtzel held onto her material along with notebooks she had kept to journal her thoughts. She then wrote an article about taking Prozac to beat depression, and eventually it became clear that her untold story of Harvard life was actually about being depressed.

    Wurtzel conceived of her memoir idea when the form was much less popular than it is today. “Any memoirs were pretty much written by famous people, ” she says. “I was encouraged to either turn it into a novel or make it more of a sociological study of depression in young people or something.”

    The title ended up suggesting a more sociological account than the book actually presents, and readers expecting a cultural study of depression found instead a very personal account.

    “It got a lot of nasty reviews and I think a lot of people did have this feeling of ‘What’s this privileged person doing complaining?’” she says. “Although I think I make this point in the book that that’s the thing about depression–it’s ridiculous. It’s about being sad about nothing.”

    Along with many of the other Harvard memoirists, Aaron J. Greenspan ’04-’05 wrote a deeply personal account that ending up having a therapeutic effect for him.

    Although he only printed a thousand copies of his memoir, “Authoritas: One Student’s Harvard Admissions and the Founding of the Facebook Era, ” Greenspan says that the real value of the project was in the writing process. “It was either that or seeing a psychologist, ” he says. “I didn’t want to be a nervous wreck for my entire life because of something that happened when I was in college.”

    Greenspan’s memoir, which he began writing in August 2004, describes his personal history and unique college experience.

    During his undergraduate years, Greenspan says he designed a web-based email system, a textbook exchange, and a course review tool for a statistics class. Eventually, he decided to combine his programs to make a web service he called houseSYSTEM. Greenspan tried to spread the word about this program, which included a universal directory called the Face Book (known also as the Universal Facebook and The Universal Face Book) that integrated all of the Harvard House facebooks.

    Only a few hundred of the 1200-1300 people who were using houseSYSTEM started using the Face Book. One user, briefly, was fellow Harvard student Mark E. Zuckerberg ’06-’07. By the time Greenspan was about to graduate–early, because he had opted to pursue Advanced Standing–he was reading about reports of Zuckerberg’s success with The Facebook.

    Greenspan decided to explain his side of the story. While his friends were toiling over theses, he took on his own massive writing project and wrote a 333-page memoir of his life until graduation. Though he developed a computer program to contact every literary agent in America, he ultimately couldn’t find a publisher and self-published the book instead.

    FIRST IMPRESSIONS

    “There are several ways of approaching a big subject like Harvard, ” writes Richard P. Bissell ’36 in “You Can Always Tell A Harvard Man.” “One is to take the subway cars from Park Street or South Station, getting a fine view of the Carter’s Ink sign as you cross over the Charles River bridge.”

    Though Bissell was being clever, the opening of his 1962 book hits on a common element of the modern memoirs set at Harvard: focusing on the entrance.

    Like all the memoirists FM talked to, Summer started the Harvard section of “Learning Joy From Dogs Without Collars” with Freshman Move-In. Summer, whose picture in the Freshman Directory showed her with fluorescent orange hair and a multicolored striped shirt and tie, brought friends from Quincy High School to help her move her things into Weld. She wrote: “‘Where do we park?’ Jeff asked. ‘Pahk the Cahr in the Hahvahd Yahd, ’ Mary said, and we all giggled.”

    Move-In Day is foreshadowing in “Prozac Nation.” The first Harvard chapter begins with Wurtzel’s mother chiding her for commenting that the rain on the drive to Boston “doesn’t bode well.” She hoped the change in environment would snap her daughter out of her depression. “But when we got to Matthews Hall on Saturday afternoon and discovered I lived on the fifth floor and there were no elevators, ” Wurtzel wrote, “even she became a little less optimistic.”

    Greenspan’s portrayal of his arrival is similarly ominous. “It was far too early in the morning, and the September air was brisk as we sped up Western Avenue, ” he wrote at the opening of Chapter 11 of “Authoritas, ” “I was reading printed directions off a bright red sheet of paper. Unlike most streets where you had to strain your eyes to read any addresses at all, the numbers here were larger than life, almost two feet tall and bold, so that they looked like they might hurt if they fell on you.”

    The fear he reads into the large numbers suggests the unease that will underlie the rest of the events in his detailed account of the disappointments of his college career, which culminate in watching others get rich off of an idea he claimed he developed.

    Consistent with the reflective but positive tone of “A Darker Shade of Crimson, ” Navarrette is a more upbeat than Wurtzel or Greenspan, but he too describes his arrival in words laden with significance. He is preoccupied with the “Enter to Grow in Wisdom” inscription when his taxi pulls up to Johnston Gate. “As I walked awkwardly with too many bags and not enough hands through the darkness of Harvard Yard, the driver’s words echoed. Good luck. Odd.”

    “I was, after all, merely going to college, ” Navarrette writes, “As so many of my classmates from high school–60 percent of them, to be exact–were doing and as others had done for generations before me. Good luck? I didn’t need luck, I thought to myself. Public school or not, I was bad.”

    INSIDE SCOOP

    Characters in “An Expensive Education” are forever gazing up Annenburg’s spires, and McDonell name-checks Square restaurants and student organizations in his third novel. But beyond casual allusion is the more challenging task of describing things not obvious to anyone but those familiar with Harvard. Sometimes this means defining terms like concentration or TF with a jab at Harvard’s refusal to conform. Sometimes that means dispelling rumors.

    As one can surmise from reading “Prozac Nation, ” when Wurtzel attended Harvard in the ’80s, it was a different time. “The Adams House swimming pool was still open, and people just had orgies in there, ” she says, “That’s not a myth.”

    Although Keith A. Gessen ’97, the author of “All The Sad Young Literary Men, ” is a novelist, the sentiments he conveys through his characters are indeed tied to his own feelings about his Harvard experience. In his 2008 novel, one of the things Gessen hoped to convey in a protagonist’s flashbacks to his days at Harvard was the letdown Gessen experienced when he realized the college of his dreams was not what he had imagined.

    “I had a lot of ideas of what Harvard was going to be like, and that it was going to redeem all the time I had wasted getting into Harvard, ” he says. “And then you get there, and it’s a lot of the same shit as the rest of the world. A lot of the same kind of class divisions, and a lot of people who just want to drink beer and go work at investment banks.”

    Sometimes it is necessary to marshal less than scintillating aspects of Harvard life to hold retrospective weight. In “A Darker Shade of Crimson, ” Navarrette wanders into the Yard earlier than his classmates, reporting for “a special work detail.” And in this special work detail, he writes, “a group of us would clean and ready the dormitory rooms of arriving undergraduates.” And like many other recorded events, Dorm Crew gets vested with symbolic and personal significance. “When asked of all Harvard taught me, I sometimes joke that my very first lesson was how to scrub a toilet. Appropriately so, perhaps.”

    And if the dressed up term “special work detail” makes you laugh, Dorm Crew’s shout-out in “An Expensive Education” is imbued with a similar significance. While the elite are out swilling Bloody Marys for Sunday brunch at Deadalus, international students are swishing Mur-Kil down their shower drains. “The introductory meeting looked like an abbreviated European Union of reluctant janitors. A Scottish piano virtuoso, two Irishmen, half a dozen girls from Eastern Europe who were either short and stout like potato balls or tall and thin like dune grass on the Baltic, ” McDonell writes.

    WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE

    But far stickier than explaining Harvard places and objects is the quandary of whether to use real names of people. Gessen’s titular sad young men represent what he describes as three guys who are each similar in different ways to the author.

    “One of them is in the first person, and it just seemed natural to go ahead and call him Keith. And in a way, he’s the character who is least actually like me.” The roommate character is an amalgam of Gessen’s actual roommates. As for other central figures in the book, Gessen graduated two years ahead of Kristin Gore, but he insists that Lauren, the vice president’s daughter in the book, is not based on Gore, who he only knew “a tiny bit.”

    For Greenspan, the decision to use only real names–no pseudonyms or composites– was difficult. “There were a lot of my friends who I wanted to include in the book who actually just aren’t in the book at all, because I wanted to write about them and they didn’t want to be tied up in the craziness that is my life, ” he says.

    Wurtzel’s friends may have even more reason to be scared. “On Halloween of my freshman year, ” she wrote, “I found myself running through Harvard Yard because my best friend (at least so far), Ruby, was pursuing me and threatening to kill me, her pocket knife unsheathed, screaming something like, ‘you bitch, I’ll kill you.’”

    Is Ruby real? And is she okay with having her knife-wielding chase immortalized in “Prozac Nation”? “It’s not her real name, but she’s a real person, ” Wurtzel says. “And she’s actually, it’s amazing now, she has three kids and works in private equity. And she is nothing like she was in the book.”

    In fact, the two stay in touch. “I adore her, ” Wurtzel says.

    UNIVERSALITY

    Although the uniqueness of their experiences gives interest and profundity to their memoirs, paradoxically, many of the Harvard memoirists’ stories actually have universal appeal.

    Just as Gessen characterizes his novel as one about the “disappointments of young men with the world, ” — first, perhaps, with Harvard, and then with what they encounter next — so too do the trials Wurtzel and the others memoirists describe extend beyond the realm of Harvard.

    After “A Darker Shade of Crimson” was published, Navarrette got a call from a retired doctor in Fresno, where Navarrette now works as a journalist. “He said, ‘When I was going through USC in the 1930’s, I was one of only a handful of Jewish kids. And so my experience of being Jewish at USC in the 1930’s, ’ he said, ‘was exactly the same as you being Latino in Harvard in the 1980’s.’”

    MOST READ
    #MeToo: Why I Didn’t Want Winthrop
    Private School Graduates Overrepresented Among Phi Beta Kappa Inductees
    Who Can Be ‘Racist’?
    Harvard Senior Larry Allen Jr. Signs with Dallas Cowboys, Continuing Father's Legacy
    Guide to Visitas

    FOR THE MOMENT
    Pins and Policy
    By JYOTIKA BANGA

    HARVARD IN THE WORLD
    On Loving Mailer—the Book and the Man
    By SOPHIE T. BEARMAN

    SUMMER POSTCARD
    POSTCARD: Make Your Own Damn Paris
    By JAMES K. MCAULEY

    HARVARD IN THE WORLD
    'Homeless to Harvard' Protagonist Releases Memoir
    By JAMES K. MCAULEY

    HARVARD SQUARE
    Mark Vonnegut Comes to Harvard Bookstore
    By AFOMA C. UMEANO

    BOOKS
    Oates Mourns, Recounts Devastating 'Widow's Story'
    By ALYSSA N. REIMER

    The Harvard Crimson
    Privacy Policy Rights and Permissions Contact Us

    9 Votes
  • St
    Stop Invading Privacy May 04, 2019

    Horrendous invasion of privacy and destruction of careers.

    Comments

    11 Votes
  • Gr
    Grossman kid May 16, 2019

    aaron greenspan used the (info) to EXTORT financal money out of facebook and zuckerberg paid the extortion money.

    http://globalslaves.blogspot.com/2015/04/paul-ceglia-has-been-falsely-charged-by.html?m=1

    https://www.msigeek.com/5982/interview-with-david-kirkpatrick-author-the-facebook-effect

    People Are Waking Up to the Great Deception (Featured Stories)
    "Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass."

    "Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching."

    "If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief."

    "Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh."

    "Now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed."

    April 6, 2015
    Paul Ceglia Has Been Falsely Charged by the U.S. Government in Retaliation for Suing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg; He Will Not Get a Fair Trial, Which is Why He is 'On the Lam'
    Click image to read entire press release by 'Friends of Paul Ceglia' group

    On April 3, 2015, U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick said that Facebook and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, must turn over documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client, Paul Ceglia, claims 50 percent ownership in the social media giant. U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick ordered Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg to relinquish by April 6th documents that were requested by Ceglia's lawyer, Robert Ross Fogg.

    Ceglia filed a civil lawsuit against Zuckerberg on June 30, 2010, three months after the movie, The Social Network, based on the founding of Facebook, opened in theaters (it opened on October 1, 2010), claiming that an April 23, 2003 contract (Document 415, Exhibit 2) between Ceglia and Zuckerberg gave Ceglia 50 percent ownership in "the face book" project, as well as an additional 1% ownership of the project per day for every day that the project remained uncompleted past a certain launch date. Ceglia says he originally paid Zuckerberg $1, 000 by check and then an additional $1, 000 in November 2003.

    When the lawsuit and the purported contract came to light, Facebook dismissed the whole thing as a fabrication. Specifically, Facebook said the "StreetFax" part of the contract was real but the rest had been doctored to include mention of "the face book."

    Zuckerberg acknowleges the April 23, 2003 contract with Ceglia included writing program code for "StreetFax" but denies the contract included any mention of Facebook. He claims he didn't come up with the idea for Facebook until months after he responded to Ceglia's online help-wanted ad and signed a contract agreeing to create some software for him.

    In early August 2011, Facebook's lawyers claimed they unearthed the "original" contract on Ceglia's parent's computer in the form of a TIFF file, with "page one" of the image being different from "page one" of the contract on paper that Ceglia submitted as the authentic contract signed on April 23, 2003. Two weeks later, on August 15, 2011, while Ceglia was in Ireland, and a day before motions were scheduled to begin, Facebook's lawyers submitted to the court the "StreetFax" contract.

    The following is part of the court filing by Facebook's lawyers late on the night of August 15, 2011 as reported by The Evening Tribune:
    “This Court should grant Defendants’ cross-motion to compel, deny Ceglia’s motion to compel, and award Defendants all other relief, including attorneys’ fees, to which they may be entitled.
    “The court-ordered forensic testing has uncovered the authentic contract between Mark Zuckerberg and StreetFax that Ceglia attempted to conceal. This smoking-gun evidence confirms what Defendants have said all along: the purported contract attached to the complaint is an outright fabrication. The authentic contract — which mentions only StreetFax and has nothing to do with Facebook — was found embedded in the electronic data from 2004 on Ceglia’s computer. See Aug. 15 Southwell Decl., Ex. A. This Court has now rejected Ceglia’s desperate effort to suppress the authentic contract by overruling his baseless confidentiality designations. Ceglia has no explanation for his fraud on the Court and does not even attempt to explain how his manufactured case can continue in the face of the authentic contract.
    “The forensic analysis also revealed that Ceglia has been willfully concealing six USB or other removable storage devices containing highly relevant documents such as “Zuckerberg Contract page1.tif” and a folder entitled “Facebook Files.” Ceglia now claims — incredibly and outrageously — that he is “unable to locate these devices.”
    Close-Up of a Faxed Version of the Ceglia "Work for Hire" Facebook Contract Signed by Zuckerberg on April 23, 2003

    A Portion of Ceglia's "Work for Hire" Facebook Contract on the Left and the TIFF "StreetFax"Image That Facebook Claims to Have Unearthed on Ceglia's Parent's Hard Drive

    Excerpt from the Declaration by Document Expert James A. Blanco That The Ceglia "Work for Hire" Facebook Contract is Authentic

    The Ceglia Two-Page "Work for Hire" Facebook Contract Between Ceglia and Zuckerburg Signed on April 23, 2003 (Quality of the Hand-written Portion Has Diminished Due to Extensive Processing and Exposure to UV Light by Facebook Experts When Examining the Document for 18 Hours)

    Sometime in 2011, DLA Piper, a global law firm with 4, 200 lawyers in more than 30 countries, had signed on to represent Ceglia in his case against Facebook in Zuckerberg. DLA Piper said that they did hours of due diligence on Ceglia's Facebook suit before even taking it on.

    In April 2011, Ceglia produced a string of emails with Zuckerberg that Ceglia validate his 50 percent ownership of Facebook. About two months after Ceglia filed the emails with the court, DLA Piper withdrew from the case, saying: “We have withdrawn from the case and no longer represent Paul Ceglia. Due to our attorney-client privilege obligations, there will be no further comment.” Facebook claims the emails are fake. Click here for Business Insider's analysis of the contract and click here for the alleged e-mails between Ceglia and Zuckerberg.

    Disregarding Ceglia's evidence authenticating the contract in his civil action against Zuckerberg, the U.S. government on October 25, 2012 criminally charged him for wire and mail fraud. The charges carry a maximum 40-year prison term. The government's complaint accuses Ceglia of altering the contract and inventing emails that didn't exist. According to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office in New York City, Ceglia "doctored, fabricated, and destroyed evidence to support his false claim."
    U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preetinder "Preet" Bharara — who was formerly with the law firm representing Zuckerberg and Facebook in these civil appeals — defending the indictment on wire fraud, stating: “As alleged, by marching into federal court for a quick payday based on a blatant forgery, Paul Ceglia has bought himself another day in federal court for attempting a multi-billion dollar fraud against Facebook and its CEO. Ceglia’s alleged conduct not only constitutes a massive fraud attempt, but also an attempted corruption of our legal system through the manufacture of false evidence. That is always intolerable. Dressing up a fraud as a lawsuit does not immunize you from prosecution.”
    Randall C. Till, the Inspector-in-Charge of the New York Office of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) said: “When Mr. Ceglia allegedly decided to take advantage of Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, he underestimated the resolve of the Postal Inspection Service to bring him to justice for illegal use of the U.S. Mail.”
    Ceglia has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges of fraud.

    Facebook's lawyers claim Ceglia replaced the first page of the real contract he signed with Zuckerberg with another page that was "doctored" to include Facebook references. However, Ceglia had nine experts who declared that the contract is authentic, but this evidence was disregarded by the court. Also disregarded by the court was the testimony of an polygraph examiner certified in Polygraph Science (Forensic Psychophysiology), who is a full member of the American Polygraph Association and American Association of Police Polygraphists and who received a certification of specialized training from the American Polygraph Association. The expert said the questions asked during the polygraph examination were designed to determine whether Ceglia had forged or doctored the contract. After conducting three polygraph exams of Ceglia on June 11, 2011, which paid particular attention to the authenticity of the "Work for Hire" Facebook Contract between Ceglia and Zuckerberg dated April 28, 2003, the examiner found conclusively that there was "no deception."

    Ceglia claims that Zuckerberg hacked his parent's computer and planted a fabricated TIFF image of the contract onto the hard drive, and also that Zuckerberg deleted e-mails between them two of them from his own computers. It certainly seems probable that the founder of Facebook who hacked the Harvard network as a teenager could do this. Not only is the pattern of Zuckenberg's behavior consistent with all of this, it is also consistent with the speculation that Zuckenberg or Facebook used law firm connections to preemptively go after Ceglia, who was endeavoring in a business which by definition would be at risk for working capital problems, and doing so at a time when the economy was in a tailspin. If you want to understand the behavior of someone like Zuckenberg, whose alleged conduct while at Harvard included felony hacking and serious fraud against others, you need to think outside the box. With the array of "services" available from large, greedy law firms in the U.S., does anyone with any experience in the real world think that it is entirely possible that the accusation and prosecution of Ceglia over a failing wood pellet business was possibly manipulated?

    Below is a full email that Ceglia sent to ZDNet on August 16, 2011, with original spacing, spelling, and grammar errors left intact:
    We have known about this photoshopped "image" for some time and i willingly handed it over to them, now they claim it is the original and that there are other files I'm intentionally not handing over, when I gave over their doctored page 1.. It's laughable... they make this stuff up as they go along.

    I believe based on the fact that Orin Snyder argued almost exclusively for my parents computers, the location where the so called "image" was discovered that either Orin Snyder is clairvoyant and had a premonition that his "smoking gun" was on my parents computer or he knew in advance that it was planted there. Perhaps by Zuckerberg himself and perhaps by Orrick, the firm Eduardo Savrin accused of conspiring with Zuckerberg to deprive him of his shares during his case. If that is the case then they are subornating perjury and conspiring along with Zuckerberg to protect the empire and this time they are going to get caught. Eduardo Savrin, the bus is rolling, just needs a little push from the sidelines.

    It is obvious that these major outlets continue to protect Mark and his "new image". He is an admitted forgerer, he was forced to admit it under oath, not because he feels compelled to tell the truth, like ever, but because he carelessly wrote as his home adress on the document he was forging an address that he didnt know about or move to until more than a year after the document was supposedly written! A rational person would think I need not say more, and that surely my arrest for mushrooms 14 years ago or the fact that I fell behind on wood pellet orders that have long since paid back is irrelevant compared to the more daming and far more on point evidence that Zuckerberg is an admitted forger and an admitted hacker, yet a read of the major media outlets shows what most people know already, that our "Free Press" slant the news to the big boss's views. A luxury afforded the Billionaires of this world that clearly have their own agendas. Perhaps calling them out like this will force some two sided coverage of the story.

    We've now waited weeks past when we were due to get the 175 emails from Zuckerberg, supposedly because they were afraid that I might use them, as if it was I that needed additional support for my side of the case. Me, a guy that has limited computer knowledge, they are concerned about, but the fact that Mark has now had more than two weeks to do the very same thing... having had all my emails to read so that he can make his sound like a better narrative is ignored and I have to trust that he, the admitted forger, isnt actively switching his emails around to counter mine??!!! wierder and wierder.

    Zuckerberg reminds me a great deal of the great Edward J Smith, captain of the Titanic, ignorant of the conditions surrounding him he arrogantly continues onward until the moment he hits the iceberg. You've hit your Iceberg now bud so don't come to Ireland again, this time crying to me that you have to protect your image.

    History will record you as the only billionaire to have ever lost his empire to a Tiff image.

    This "image" they claim is the original is forged and we will prove it has no authenticating properties what so ever. I would have expected more from him and his henchmen.

    You won't go public Mark, you won't IPO, you won't pass go. I won't let you sell this company out from under me not while I have the power to stop you.

    We have conslusive proof Mark is lying and we are searching for more, anyone with some legal or technical expertise that would like to help us nail him down for good is welcome to join in at PaulsCase.com

    What I can tell you is, before the testing it was Orin "King Kong" Snyder beating his chest with "amateurish forgery" claims on the original paper contract, now that they have tested it, suddenly we hear no more about that, though you will be hearing a lot from us on it in the coming months. Suddenly there are requests for a second round of ink testing, clearly outside the court order for expedited discovery and I don't think it takes much to conlude that they wouldnt need more ink if the first batch they took showed a "real" smoking gun as they claimed it would.

    Even some of their experts have come under fire from their own colleagues for the false or misleading testimony they gave. (see the linguistics expert publicly outted by the president of the linguistics society)

    Instead they continue to make up their defense as they go along and now talk about this "image" and since Mark has now officially claimed that is the original then I'm happy to be the first to say- "Mark Zuckerberg has admitted to Forgery and he has done it once again." this time though he isnt just going to get away with it and buy himself out, you will face a jury of our peers Mark, and your PR team won't be there to save you.

    To adopt a line from the movie-

    750 million dollars isnt cool Mark, you know what 's cool? 750 million users is cool...

    Some unrelated opinions...

    From the Arab Spring to the riots of London last week, I see that social networks are the peoples tools to not only talk about how bored we are today, or to worry about everyone seeing that last photo we put up, but also when users are oppressed somewhere and realize it, it obviously can be used to overthrow tyranny and outmanuever the forces that protect the establishment. It's become the peoples voice and a powerful tool to unite the masses. It's a tool that deserves to stay in the hands and control of the people.

    I'm starting to have all sorts of opinions as to what I'll do when I'm at the helm. Some might call it delusions of self grandure, you can call me what you like but if Thomas Jefferson was right and that- "all tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" then in good conscience when I'm at the helm I won't let any government have the power to silence it's citizens, especially during an uprising. Money has never been my interest in this case, most of the lawyers for sure, but for me the network is what is important, we have a lot of tyrants to rid ourselves of in this world and a lot of inappropriate pictures to share with our singular circle of friends but as Michael Franti says..we won't stop.. and I won't quit...
    On March 26, 2013, in a court filing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio recommended that Facebook's motion to dismiss the lawsuit be granted, pointing to "clear and convincing evidence" that the 2003 contract between Ceglia and Zuckerberg is a "recently created fabrication." The judge said the contract in question between Zuckerberg and Ceglia was a "fabrication" and that Ceglia "knows it." In a 155-page recommendation, Foschio said Ceglia's arguments largely consisted of "self-defeating inconsistencies" that established the "fraudulent nature" of his claims. The case (#14-1365), which was referred to Foschio by U.S. District Judge Richard J. Arcara, on May 2, 2011, for pretrial matters, went back to Arcara to decide whether to approve Foschio's recommendation for dismissal.

    A year later, on March 25, 2014, U.S. District Judge Richard Arcara in Buffalo dismissed Ceglia's lawsuit against Zuckerberg and Facebook on the grounds that the contract was a "fabrication" and there was spoliation of evidence. Additionally, a federal judge in Manhattan refused to dismiss the indictment charging Ceglia with mail and wire fraud. The judge in a separate ruling dismissed a lawsuit by Ceglia seeking to prevent Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara from prosecuting him for the Facebook lawsuit.

    Ceglia's lawyers, Joseph Alioto and Gil Messina, are appealing the judge's decision to dismiss his civil lawsuit against Zuckerberg and Facebook — the lawsuit that ended up as the basis for the criminal charges. The following is an excerpt from the appeal.
    The criminal prosecution was commenced while the Facebook Action was pending and it was brought in a district distant from where the civil case was being litigated. The criminal prosecution was instigated, it is believed, by Zuckerberg and Facebook because of the incestuous relationship between their attorneys and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preetinder "Preet" Bharara, who was formerly with the law firm representing Zuckerberg and Facebook in these civil appeals. At the time Ceglia was arrested, the U.S. Attorney made extrajudicial comments stating, “Dressing up a fraud as a lawsuit does not immunize you from prosecution.”

    The extraordinary timing of the indictment of Mr. Ceglia — while the Facebook Action was pending — was intended to chill his First Amendment right to pursue the Facebook Action. In fact, the government alluded to the fact that further court filings by Ceglia’s lawyers in the Facebook Action could result in further charges being brought against him and his lawyers.

    The indictment, we submit, was also calculated to prejudice (1) the Magistrate Judge, who would ultimately grant Facebook's and Zuckerberg's Motion to Dismiss the Facebook Action as fraud on the court, and (2) the District Judge, who accepted the Report and Recommendation without addressing any of the substantial objections raised by Ceglia.

    The scheme did not succeed in deterring Ceglia from proceeding with the Facebook Action, but it did succeed in causing his lead counsel (Dean Boland) to move to be relieved on October 30, 2012, because, as the Magistrate Judge stated in his Order of March 20, 2013, the attorney was said to "fear for his safety" and because of "threats... made against him, " (Facebook Action, Doc. 649, p. 9), even though the attorney "states his continued belief that Plaintiff, in bringing and prosecuting his action, has not committed fraud, a factor which could justify withdrawal under N.Y. Rule 1.16(c)(2), (3)." [Boland is among more than a half dozen lawyers and law firms to have signed on and then withdrawn from Ceglia's 2010 lawsuit.]

    The District Court in Buffalo denied Ceglia a meaningful discovery from Facebook and Zuckerberg and denied Ceglia the opportunity to depose Zuckerberg in both the Facebook and Holder Actions. Zuckerberg has never denied under oath that the signature and initials on the original Work for Hire Contract — or so-called Facebook Contract — are his. Instead, the Magistrate Judge granted Zuckerberg's and Facebook's motion to dismiss the Facebook Action as a fraud after considering only the evidence most favorable to Facebook and Zuckerberg and Ceglia's rebuttal evidence. However, Ceglia's evidence supporting the authenticity of the Work for Hire Contract is so overwhelming that the Magistrate's decision to consider the evidence most favorable to Facebook and Zuckerberg is erroneous on its face.

    Note: Ceglia's evidence that was disregarded by the court, although the Magistrate and District Judge were required to take it as true and view it in the light most favorable to Ceglia, starts on page 8 of the document.
    On or about March 6, 2015, with his May 4 trial for wire and mail fraud approaching, Ceglia, 41, sliced off his GPS ankle monitor and affixed it to a crudely built contraption in his rural New York home "in order to give the appearance that he was still present and moving within his home" (see image below). [As part of Ceglia's $250, 000 bail conditions, he was required to wear a GPS electronic monitoring device around his ankle.]

    Ceglia has been declared a fugitive. The U.S. Marshals Service, which is offering a $5, 000 reward for "information leading to the location and arrest" of Celgia, said he is believed to be traveling with his wife, his two sons, and his dog since they also are missing from their home in Wellsville, N.Y., 70 miles southeast of Buffalo.

    Paul Ceglia's GPS anklet is hanging from the bottom of this ceiling-based contraption designed to keep the monitoring device moving and to make it appear as if he was at his rural New York home. Ceglia and family have vanished. [Source]

    Ceglia's apparent disappearance came 17 days after U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick approved subpoenas on February. 20, 2015, forcing Zuckerberg and Facebook to divulge by March 15, 2015, all "contracts, agreements and addendums" between Ceglia and Zuckerberg or their companies from January 1, 2003 to July 29, 2004. In addition, Zuckerberg is being forced to release all electronic communications regarding agreements during that same time frame. Facebook and Zuckerberg asked the judge to suspend until Ceglia is caught the order he issued earlier for them to promptly turn over to Ceglia's attorneys the requested documentation and communications.

    On March 12, 2015, the New York-based federal appeals court ordered Ceglia's lawyers to "show cause, on or before March 20, 2015, as to why the captioned civil appeals should not be dismissed on the grounds that a fugitive from justice is not entitled to adjudication of his civil claims." Ceglia's attorneys, Alioto and Messina, say the appeal should go on because it's Ceglia's constitutional right. "The extraordinary timing of the indictment of Mr. Ceglia — while the Facebook Action was pending — was intended to chill his First Amendment right to pursue the Facebook action, " they said.

    During a March 24, 2015 hearing, Ceglia's father told U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick that his son might have fled because he believes Facebook and Zuckerberg are working together with prosecutors against him, jeopardizing his chance for a fair trial:
    Carmine Ceglia said his son found it "really upsetting" when he was told lawyers hired by Facebook were working with prosecutors on the criminal case against him. "We didn't feel like we were getting a fair shot, " he said. "I've lost a lot of faith in our justice system." Of the U.S. Marshals Service, the father said: "They just think I know where he is, and I don't."
    Back in August of 2011, Ceglia wrote in an email to a Wellsville Daily Reporter:
    “As you know Zuckerberg has seemingly stopped at nothing to try to slander me during this case so far and part of that has been their use of private investigators not just to investigate me, but far beyond that to harass me and my family daily. From waking up to discover people hiding in (a) back field with binoculars, to being followed day-in and day-out by these guys, to coming home and finding a back window open that I know I personally locked causes what I can only say borders on paranoia and I refuse to let the bad guys win through intimidation tactics.”
    Judge Broderick told Ceglia's father that he would not allow a trial to proceed unjustly. Broderick then revoked Ceglia's bail and entered a $250, 000 judgment against Ceglia's parents and brother. Broderick said he might reduce the penalty if the family helps locate Ceglia.
    Ceglia's father Carmine said he did not know where his son was but expressed sympathy for him, suggesting that Facebook's principal lawyer was unduly influencing federal prosecutors. "I think he was afraid for his life that he wasn't going to get a fair shot, " Carmine Ceglia said.
    Facebook's lawyer had no immediate comment. [Source]
    Gil Messina, one of Ceglia's attorneyes, filed papers late on March 23, 2015 with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where Ceglia is trying to have the criminal charges against him dismissed, saying the charges were brought improperly to punish Ceglia for exercising his First Amendment right to prove through a civil lawsuit that he has a 50 percent ownership stake in Facebook. The government's key witness for Ceglia's jury trial for fraud is Zuckerberg. Other than Zuckerberg, prosecutors' main evidence is the asserted real contract and a forensics analysis of the alleged fake contract that prompted a federal judge to declare it was "a fabrication." However, Ceglia says Zuckerberg hacked or "planted" a forged contract — the one prosecutors say is the original — onto Ceglia family computers in a bid to protect Zuckerberg's own fortunes and to undermine Ceglia's claims. It's a position federal prosecutors contend is without "basis." [Source]

    At the March 24, 2015 hearing, federal prosecutor Janis Echenberg said Ceglia may soon be charged with defrauding investors in the civil lawsuit out of $650, 000 and also jumping bail. Gil Messina, a lawyer for Ceglia, said after the hearing that he and other lawyers were served on March 23, 2015, with grand jury subpoenas that appeared connected to these new charges. The civil case is Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of New York, No. 10-00569. The criminal case is U.S. v. Ceglia, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No 12-cr-00876.

    Back on October 19, 2014, Facebook filed a lawsuit in New York County Supreme Court against a handful of Ceglia's attorneys, claiming they “knew or should have known that the [initial] lawsuit was a fraud.” Included in the lawsuit is the law firm DLA Piper, which withdrew from the Ceglia case but not before telling the Wall Street Journal in 2011 that they had “100 percent confidence that [Mr. Ceglia’s] agreement is authentic.” In total, Facebook lists more than a dozen defendants in the lawsuit.
    “We said from the beginning that Paul Ceglia’s claim was a fraud and that we would seek to hold those responsible accountable, ” Facebook General Counsel Colin Stretch said. “DLA Piper and the other named law firms knew the case was based on forged documents, yet they pursued it anyway, and they should be held to account.” Facebook has never filed suit against Ceglia himself, and a company spokesperson declined to comment on whether or not it plans to take legal action against him directly. Facebook did not specify a monetary amount for damages in the lawsuit, but is seeking payment for attorney fees and “damage to reputation and harm to business interests” for the company. Of course, Facebook doesn’t need money; the suit appears to be more about payback than anything. [Source]
    On December 4, 2014, one of Ceglia's attorneys being sued by Facebook, Paul Argentieri of Hornell, N.Y., told The Evening Tribune that he is demanding a trial by jury on behalf of the group of defendants who represented Ceglia. In a statement provided to the newspaper, Argentieri wrote:
    "Plantiff Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is an individual with a well-documented history as a liar, cheater and computer hacker who has repeatedly betrayed the trust of friends and associates to his personal advantage and to their disadvantage, particularly as relates to the founding and development of Facebook and by corruptly invoking the power of the federal government through the use of his political influence and connections in an illegal effort to shut down and punish those who oppose him." Argentieri said Zuckerberg could find himself in a no-win situation, should he agree to the trial.
    "We are ready, willing and able to fight and if he's insane enough to have a trial, we'll see him there, " Argentieri told The Evening Tribune on December 3, 2014. Argentieri and his firm, Paul Argentieri & Associates, were named as defendants in the lawsuit as well as former New York State Attorney General Dennis C. Vacco and DLA Piper, a firm with more than 4, 200 lawyers in over 30 countries.

    "Zuckerberg and his minions embody a particular form of evil that must be resisted and defeated, " Argentieri told The Evening Tribune on October 21, 2014. "This is a fight I feel very comfortable in and have trained for a very long time as a trial lawyer."

    0 Votes
  • Pa
    Pacer.com RECAP stalker May 20, 2019

    Aaron Greenspan of Shaker Heights, Ohio, is temporarily staying at the Northwest Ohio Developmental Center in Toledo. Autistic and high functioning, he lost his digital camera while attending a Toledo Walleye game Feb. 12. The camera is a 'lifeline, ' for him, friends and family say, and they hope it is returned soon. 1
    Every picture tells a story, but man's precious record is gone
    The Blade logo
    BRIDGET THARP
    The Blade
    FEB 25, 2010 5:03 AM
    Aaron Greenspan lost his lifeline. Have you seen it?

    Mr. Greenspan, 24, is a temporary resident at the Northwest Ohio Developmental Center in South Toledo who recently lost his digital camera at a Toledo Walleye hockey game.

    The camera is a Canon Powershot Digital ELPH with his name and phone number on the back, and it was in a red Samsonite bag.

    Mr. Greenspan - an individual with autism who is high functioning, and who also has obsessive compulsive disorder - hopes someone who found the camera will return it.

    He is in the Toledo area, two hours away from his family in Shaker Heights, Ohio, for behavioral therapy.

    He is one of about 160 residential clients at the Toledo center, most of whom are diagnosed with severe mental retardation, said Aaron Powell, a spokesman for the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities.

    Mr. Greenspan's parents bought the camera for him two years ago, before a trip to Israel. While photographing Israeli garbage trucks, police vehicles, and public buses while on vacation, he became accustomed to taking pictures of "all kinds of things, " he said.

    The camera now holds dozens of photos of Mr. Greenspan's family and familiar places as he continues treatment at the center for the next several weeks. He plans to return to the Cleveland area by the end of March.

    His mother, Judy Greenspan, said he also counts on the photos he takes with his camera to be sure he doesn't leave personal items behind at public places.

    "It was a valuable tool for him, " she said. "I really do think it is part of his lifeline."

    Mr. Greenspan apparently misplaced the camera Feb. 12, during a Walleye hockey game he attended with a police officer from the center who took a special interest in him.

    An enthusiastic sports fan who is considered by his mother to be a "statistics encyclopedia, " Mr. Greenspan he had a great time at the game.

    Of the sport, he said: "It is rough, but people love playing hockey. I don't love playing it, but I love watching it."

    On the lost camera he has action photos of his favorite Walleye player, JC Sawyer, and posed for a photo with the Walleye mascot, Spike, his mother said.

    "When I got back, I really didn't know what happened to it, " Mr. Greenspan said. "It's just not happening. I'm really frustrated."

    4 Votes
  • De
    Dee Smart San Francisco May 27, 2019

    https://blog.simplejustice.us/2011/05/18/nobody-wants-to-hear-bad-things/

    Plenty of lawyers spend their time writing about the intersection of law and technology, but few if any are qualified to know what they’re talking about. Aaron Greenspan, on the other hand, knows about technology. Unfortunately, he learned a little something about law in the process.

    In 2004, shortly after graduating from college, I found a series of serious security flaws in one system after another, and even considered starting my career as a computer security consultant. I discovered that the username and password needed to control South Station’s merchant wireless network were “south” and “station, ” respectively (see http://www.thinkcomputer.com/cor…). I then realized that my company’s payroll vendor, a company called PayMaxx, was exposing my social security number, home address, and salary data, along with the data of many thousands of others (see http://www.thinkcomputer.com/cor…).

    No, he wasn’t sent a warm thank you for discovering security flaws. The company threatened to sue him instead. And yet he didn’t learn.

    As a slew of other security breaches appeared in the press in 2005, the GSA contracted with Unisys, a large government IT contractor, to build a software application called eOffer. The goal of the eOffer initiative was to automate the incredibly complex paper workflow necessary to approve companies for selling goods and services to the federal government. It was an expensive project requiring many programmers and resources. To secure the contract, Unisys employed one Jack Abramoff, among others, as a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. via the law firm of Greenberg Traurig LLP.

    When I signed up for eOffer I was informed that I needed a digital encryption certificate from AT&T, which I obtained and installed. It quickly became clear that the system had an enormous design flaw: anyone with such a certificate–and anyone could get one–could sign in as any company in the Department of Defense’s Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. At the time, approximately 400, 000 companies nationwide were registered, including of course every major defense contractor, technology company, and almost all of the Fortune 1000. Once signed in, it was possible to add fake records, delete legitimate records, and edit records. It was also clear that the system did not actually delete data properly, which carried additional security risks. (See http://www.thinkcomputer.com/cor… .)

    No, he didn’t get a medal. Instead, he got a visit from a couple of representatives of the government.

    Not long after, two armed federal agents appeared at my doorstep. One of them, who had no background in computer crime, handed me a copy of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, and told me that I should read it.

    When the government didn’t show its appreciation for Greenspan’s informing the inspector general of the GSA about its massive computer screw up, he went to the media, generating a New York Times article that revealed the problems. The government was not amused, which is why federal agents appeared to enlighten him. After going to Washington, paying a lawyer (“My lawyer, who sat silent for two hours as I answered the government’s questions, charged several thousand dollars, which the GSA refused to reimburse later on.”) and persuading the United States Attorney that he was not a malicious hacker, but just a guy trying to alert the government to some significant problems.

    The GSA was eventually constrained to deal with the issue, In it’s letter to Congress, GSA Acting Administrator David Bibb wrote:

    As a result of this weakness, GSA has revised its security practices and has begun to execute additional reviews during software development. This practice will enable GSA to identify vulnerabilities prior to placing the software into production,

    GSA takes the integrity of its systems seriously and will make every effort to ensure that weaknesses, such as discovered in eOffer, do not occur again.

    If you say so. But that doesn’t mean there wasn’t a bad person to blame:

    From the information provided, we determined that if the weakness described by the authorized user did exist, it could be exploited only by another authorized user and that the eOffer system was not exposed to unauthorized public access. Moreover, in order for even an authorized user to gain access to another party’s information, that user would have to abuse his or her system privileges and masquerade as another user by using the other party’s unique numerical identification code before any information could be accessed.

    That’s right, the problem wasn’t the security hole big enough to drive a virtual Mack truck through, but the evil abusive masquerading geek who would exploit it.

    The lessons about dealing with the government, rhetoric versus reality, are all too familiar to lawyers at the intersection of law and prosecution. The government doesn’t want to hear its baby is ugly, and won’t appreciate your information or candor. They will, however, make sure they aren’t to blame, which usually means you are. Somebody has to be, and its not going to be them.

    But there are lessons here for lawyers as well, not about the joys of federal agents or the vagueness of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. §1030. We already know that all too well. The message is that our newest, latest, coolest thing in the future of law, technology, the stuff that makes techno-lawyers ooze from every orifice, may be replete with problems, security issues, gaps, holes, whatever, and we wouldn’t have the slightest clue.

    We’re lawyers. Some may be more tech-savvy than others, but if they think they’ve got enough on the ball to find the gap that Unisys left behind, they’re nuts. We don’t know what we’re dealing with, and the best we can hope for is to trust that someone, somewhere did a far better job than we could in making sure that our groovy technological tool isn’t a monumental sinkhole of crap.

    Chances are pretty good that unless you happen to hang around with a geek like Greenspan, the only entity you have to trust is the enterprise that invented the tech itself, or the government. Is that good enough for you?

    As for some outsider who blows the whistle on technological flaws, consider how well Greenspan was treated for his efforts, and wonder how many others are prepared to stare down some armed federal agents more than once. This is the real intersection of law and technology, and it has nothing to do with how cool you would look carrying the iPad2.

    6 Votes
  • De
    Dee Smart San Francisco May 27, 2019

    https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2005/02/south-station-hack-shows-security-train.html

    Homegrown unabomber terrorist. This Greenspan is angry at the world just like John Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber. In very afraid to check my mail box.

    MASS HIGH TECH
    SOFTWARE
    South Station hack shows security train not on schedule
    Save
    By Ethan Forman
    Feb 21, 2005, 12:00am EST
    The router password to South Station's Web turned out to be a cinch: South:Station.

    With a few keystrokes and educated guesses to the password of the wireless router, Aaron Greenspan, 21, the chief executive officer of Think Computer Corp., was able to hack into the MBTA's South Station web site.

    Greenspan, a native of Shaker Heights, Ohio, who started the company from his bedroom at 15, runs the five-person software company a block from South Station.

    He gained access to the website on an inexpensive laptop over a wireless network in plain sight of station officials and MBTA police, he wrote in a recent white paper.

    "I could have looked around their hard drive for the database where they stored credit card numbers, " said Greenspan, who attended Harvard University and graduated in three years.

    Greenspan's white paper coincided with another well-publicized hacker attack on New Hampshire's official state website earlier this month in which someone reportedly typed "Look what I can do!" before the site was taken down.

    Security was an issue when ChoicePoint in Georgia said "a small number" of criminals posed as legitimate companies to gain access to credit reports, Social Security numbers, names and addresses of ChoicePoint customers. ChoicePoint notified tens of thousands of customers that they had been, or might have been affected.

    Computer security company officials last week gathered in San Francisco for the 14th annual RSA Conference, and some said that the buzz at the conference was that security can no longer begin and end at the firewall.

    "The buzzword is 'de-perimeterization' across the industry, " said Richard Moulds, vice president of marketing at nCipher Corp., a U.K.-based security software company with offices in Woburn.

    The proliferation of wireless networks gives hackers another angle of attack on the network. So companies such as nCipher offer software to encrypt that data, freezing out intrusions.

    "You should think about the network inside your company as you do the Internet, " Moulds said.

    Tom Corn, executive vice president of marketing and strategy at Cambridge network intrusion software company Mazu Networks, said his company is seeing a lot more hacks from wireless networks.

    "Those (networks) are much easier to hack if they are not properly managed, " Corn said.

    Mazu's study, conducted by Enterprise Strategy Group of 229 companies with more than 1, 000 employees and released Feb. 7, found that nearly 47 percent of the companies were compromised by worms in the network and that 96 percent of the affected firms had firewalls. Another 27 percent said they were not sure if a "credentialed" user was affecting the network from the inside.

    "You just can't solve it by placing a box somewhere, " Corn said. "You need coverage everywhere." Mazu's software sniffs out unusual behavior on the network.

    After he hacked into South Station's web site, Greenspan managed to change the parameters of the site from one requiring a credit card to one that was free.

    Before publishing his paper, he contacted hotspot deployment vendor Atlantis Technology Corp. of Concord. The company makes guestBox software, and its web site touts its security features. The company did not immediately return calls for comment.

    Greenspan said the point was not to wreak havoc on South Station's web site or to prove that wireless networks provide another security headache.

    "The fundamental fact is that things are only secure as the weakest link, " Greenspan said about his hack. "In this case, the weakest link was only four lines of codes that were missing."

    8 Votes
  • Cl
    Close data mining websites Jun 10, 2020

    The public needs to speak up and contact your Senators and Congressmen/women to outlaw this data mining of legal documents that private citizens are uploading on to their private monetized websites for their own selfish money making schemes.

    There is no excuse for these abuses by just a few individuals who use and abuse the First Amendment to justify their criminal behaviors of destroying people's lives by uploading people's personal and legal information just so they can laugh all the way to the Bank. What these people are doing is also a violation of the First Amendment, as it does not allow people to harm others and that is what these people who don't want to work are doing to the public.

    No other country in the world allows private citizens to open up monetized websites and then upload people's personal and legal documents for their own selfish greed to make money off of people's hardships.

    In Europe there are laws against this GDPR and data protection laws and the United States needs to quickly enact these same types of laws, so that people who need to work for a living can go out and feed their families without having to worry about some lazy person saying stupid things like its "public information", or that they have a First Amendment Right. The public has many rights too. The only way this will change will be if people speak up and complain to their Senators and Congressmen/women.

    In the United States there is the Federal database Pacer from where a lot of these career destroying monetized websites download their legal documents from. The difference is that Pacer does not upload legal documents on to the search engines for profit. The only way these private individuals can make money is by attracting people to their monetized websites by posting negative information on people and charging all kinds of stupid subscription fees and they make money by advertising and asking money to have legal documents removed from their monetized sites.

    The people that create these monetized websites and upload people's legal documents are the only criminals here and they pretend that they do nothing wrong and have rights to do this, when they know full well that they are harming so many people all across the United States but they don't care as long as they have this source of revenue.

    People need to speak up and get the laws changed in the United States so that people do not have to worry about some troll uploading one's personal and legal documents on the search engines for their selfish greed. In Europe these individuals who create and operate theses monetized websites and upload people's personal and legal information are prosecuted under various criminal statutes and the same needs to be done in the United States.

    1 Votes

aaron greenspan uses his website plainsite.org to terrorize, harass, and stalks people

* Do not let this individual Aaron Greenspan harass, intimidate, threaten or bully in any way this website to remove anything, as "We the People" have the exact same First Amendment Rights as this Sociopath does and we are exposing the full truth on this Hacker and Menace to Society.

Aaron Greenspan is a sick evil [censor] who fully enjoys and gets his kicks out of destroying people's careers and reputations with his vicious website plainsite.org after he did not succeed with face cash in 2011 he turned in to very sick Psychopath who is angry at the world and he even hates himself. This is why now he is bent on destroying everyone's careers and reputations that he can and make no mistake, this [censor] is doing everything fully intentional.

His father Neil S Greenspan with NPI Number [protected] who is the VP and Treasurer for plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer is a sick Sociopath. Aaron Greenspan has his sick fathers (Neil S Greenspan's) genes, which obviously are [censor] up to have produced a total Sociopath like Aaron Greenspan.

Aaron Greenspan is so miserable that he wants the whole world to be misrable. This individual is completely insane and belongs locked up on a Psychiatric Ward for the safety of the public and should never be allowed to go near a computer, smart device or anyone's personal information ever again.

Aaron Greenspan enjoys following in Aaron Swartz's footsteps who was a major Hacker and now Aaron Greenspan is doing the exact same thing. This individual is Hacking in to State and Federal databases such as Pacer, Hacking in to Sealed and highly classified documents and then uploading these documents on to his sick monetized website plainsite.org.

The IRS non-profit division and other Federal Agencies have now been made aware of Aaron Greenspan's crimes against the public. This Sociopath does not appear to want to stop doing bad things to the public until he is locked up in a Psychiatric Institution with four point restraints, so he can't go near anyone's private information ever again.

There has to be something seriously mentally wrong with this father Neil S Greenspan and his mother Judith Keene Greenspan for allowing this Sociopath son of theirs to do these vicious thing to hard working men and women in America.

Neil S Greenspan with NPI Number [protected] who is employed at Case Western Reserve University should be fired by the President of this University and should take action and have Neil S Greenspan with NPI Number [protected] given a thorough Psychiatric examination because he is a danger to Case Western Reserve University and something is completely off with this individual. Neil S Greenspan should not be allowed to access anyone's personal and private data. This individual with NPI Number [protected] is a complete menace to society. Neil S Greenspan with NPI Number [protected] is intentionally violating "HIPAA", as he is the VP and Treasurer for plainsite.org and his Sociopath son Aaron Greenspan is Hacking in to legal databases, as well as medical databases and his father is fully aware that his son Aaron Greenspan is Hacking in to all these databases in the US but he enables Aaron Greenspan to dod these things to people.

The following is the personal information for Judith Keene Greenspan, D.O.B. 05/27/1954
Education: Newton North High School
20560 Shelburne
Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122
[protected]
[protected]
[protected]
[protected]@swbell.net
[protected]@keenepromotions.com
[protected]@keenepromotions.com
[protected]@keeneadvertising.com

The following is information on Aaron Greenspan's father Neil S Greenspan.
Neil S Greenspan MD? NPI Number [protected] NPI Number. That's his medical "National Provider Identifier", This individual should have his supposed MD license revoked for committing crimes against the public and being highly unethical and immoral.

Neil S Greenspan MD? NPI Number [protected] works at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio,
24701 Euclid Avenue, 3rd Floor
Cleveland, Ohio [protected]
[protected]
[protected]
[protected]

"A national provider identifier (NPI) is a unique ten-digit identification number required by HIPAA for covered healthcare providers in the United States. Covered providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses — public or private entities that process or facilitate the processing of health information — must use the NPI in administrative and financial transactions adopted under HIPAA."

"A national provider identifier (NPI) is a unique ten-digit identification number required by HIPAA for covered healthcare providers in the United States. Covered providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses — public or private entities that process or facilitate the processing of health information — must use the NPI in administrative and financial transactions adopted under HIPAA."

The NPI replaces the unique physician identification number (UPIN), a six-character identifier Medicare used to ascertain doctors in the U.S. who accepted Medicare insurance. The UPIN was discontinued in June 2007.

Who must obtain an NPI?
All individual and organizational healthcare providers who are HIPAA covered entities must obtain an NPI.

Who may not obtain an NPI?
Entities that do not meet the definition of a healthcare provider as defined by HIPAA may not apply for an NPI.

What are the healthcare provider NPI categories?
There are two healthcare provider categories for NPI enumeration:

Individual or Type 1. This category includes individuals who render healthcare services, such as physicians, nurses, dentists, pharmacists and sole providers.
Organization or Type 2. This category includes organizations that render healthcare services or provide healthcare supplies to patients, such as hospitals and home health agencies."

Aaron Greenspan enjoys uploading people's personal and private information on the web, as he gets enjoyment out of running people's careers and reputations and he is selective to who he goes after. Aaron Greenspan does not like receiving his own medicine and having his personal information uploaded on to the web but this sick [censor] thinks its alright to it to everyone else at his discretion/.

We will further expose this sick [censor] Aaron Greenpsn and his sick [censor] father Neil S Greenspan as two degenerates who enjoy doing throwing people's information on the web but don't like it when its done to them.

We will keeping people posted on new information that is coming in about these two sick Sociopath's/

Share via FacebookShare via TwitterShare via RedditShare via GoogleShare via Tumblr

  • Ww
    www.thinkcomputer.org Aug 14, 2018

    Robert Ambrogi is a brave man for outing Aaron Greenspan for using the name John Fuenchem. Aaron Greenspan had been stalking me for 3 years and same for others.

    Now Aaron Greenspan is going to stalk Robert Ambrogi. You should expect atleast 1 call per month. It's pretty funny when Aaron Geenspan calls pretending he is a mafia boss.

    17 Votes
  • Ww
    www.thinkcomputer.com Aug 15, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Aaron Greenspan has been harassing many people as John Fuenchem. I came across the Alleged New Facebook Mark Zuckerberg IMs.

    Think Computer Foundation, Think Computer Corporation and plainsite.org are all fraudulent 1 person companies.

    Does Aaron Greenspan also run Keene promotions.

    Comments

    20 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan is the real extortionist. Free law project is a joke. Only a lowlife like Aaron Greenspan of plainsite can make millions of something that was given for free.
    The rat face Aaron Greenspan is going to be imprisoned very soon. It's a matter of time. Aaron Greenspan is a nasty individual and crazy like Simon Greenspan .

    https://free.law. and CourtListener.com should go suck some balls.

    18 Votes
  • Pl
    Plainsite.org Aaron Greenspan Aug 27, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Dont be mistaken by Aaron Greenspan behavior. These are not tantrums. Aaron Greenspan has a autistic meltdown when not getting his way. An autistic meltdown is all about being overwhelmed. For someone with autism, when they reach the point of sensory, emotional, and information overload, or even just too much unpredictability, it can trigger a variety of external behaviours that are similar to a tantrum (such as crying, yelling, or lashing out) Aaron Greenspan autism doesnt allow him to control over his meltdowns, and he will not benefit from the normal measures to reduce tantrums like distraction, hugs, incentives to ‘behave’, or any form of discipline.

    Aaron Greenspan might unintentionally hurt himself or others during their meltdowns. Have a strategy in place to keep yourself in a safe place and ignore Aaron Greenspan when he tries to communicate with you or talks about plainsite org.

    Keywords

    Contact us if you know of coverage we’ve neglected to list below:

    Hilary Sargent, You Could Buy the Tsarnaev Trial Transcript. Or You Could Buy a Range Rover, Boston.com (Mar. 10, 2015).
    Richard Georges, CourtListener- Hear Oral Arguments OnLine, Future Lawyer (Nov. 4, 2014).
    Robert Ambrogi, CourtListener Adds Oral Arguments to its Free Research Site, LawSites (Nov. 4, 2014).
    David Greene, “Opportunity Missed: Why We’re Not Thrilled By Restoration of PACER Access to “Old” Court Records“, EFF DeepLinks (Sep. 19, 2014).
    Amul Kalia and Nadia Kayyali, “Senator Leahy to the Courts: Restore Access to Removed PACER Documents“, EFF DeepLinks (Sep. 16, 2014).
    Greg Munno, “PACER Upgrade Leaves Electronic Warehouse of Court Records Incomplete“, The FOIA Project (Sep. 5, 2014).
    Vera Eidelman and Amul Kalia, “Right to Know: The PACER Mess And How to Clean It“, EFF DeepLinks (Sep. 2, 2014).
    Nadia Prupis, “Decade of Court Cases Quietly Wiped from Online Database“, Common Dreams (Aug. 28, 2014).
    Mike Masnick, “PACER Officials Give Weak, Nonsensical Excuse For Why PACER Deleted Tons Of Public Court Records With No Notice” TechDirt (Aug. 27, 2014).
    Joe Miller & Kim Gittleson, Landmark civil rights legal records deleted from PACER, BBC (Aug. 27, 2014).
    Andrea Peterson, Why PACER removed access to case archives of five courts, Washington Post (Aug. 26, 2014).
    Mark Michels, “Can Open Source Transform Democracy?“, Law Technology News (May 6, 2014).
    Martha Sperry, “Free Law Project Is Now Even Bigger, Ergo Better” Advocate’s Studio (Jan. 15, 2014).
    Mark Boyd, “CourtListener API is Sharing the Potential of Open Data” Programmable Web (Dec. 12, 2013).
    Robert Richards, “Mill: New alert service for U.S. federal court decisions, through Scout” Legal Informatics Blog (Nov. 27, 2013).
    Michael Lissner, “The State Decoded, CourtListener Team Up to Share Legal Data” PBS Idea Lab (Nov. 25, 2013).
    Kin Lane, “API Search Endpoint Using Solr” API Evangelist (Nov. 20, 2013).
    Robert Ambrogi, “Free Law Project Creates API, Easing Others’ Use of its Court Opinions” Law Sites Blog (Nov. 19, 2013).
    Kin Lane, “The Free Law Projects Launches Court Opinion API” API Evangelist (Nov. 19, 2013).
    Paul Lomio, “Free Law Project Improves with API” Legal Research Plus (Nov. 19, 2013).
    Lisa Smith-Butler, “CourtListener” The Barrister (Nov. 4, 2013).
    Robert Ambrogi, “CourtListener Adds 1.5 Million Opinions, Expands Coverage” Law Sites Blog (Oct. 30, 2013).
    Robert Richards, “Carver and Lissner: Free Law Virtual Machine” Legal Informatics Blog (Oct. 25, 2013).
    Susan David deMaine, “The information on this website may not be up to date: The government shutdown and free access to legal information” RIPS Law Librarian Blog (Oct. 6, 2013).
    Martha Sperry, “Free Law Project to Promote Access to Law, For Free” Advocate’s Studio (Sep. 30, 2013).
    Somin Park, “Free Law Project provides access to legal materials and research for public” Daily Cal (Sep. 29, 2013).
    Patrick Durusau, “CourtListener” Another Word For It (Sep. 24, 2013).
    Robert Richards “Carver and Lissner: Free Law Project” Legal Informatics Blog (Sep. 24, 2013).

    17 Votes
  • Or
    orionresearch.net Sep 20, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is also working with Christine Richard of orionresearch.net . Everyone knows Aaron Greenspan is a pathological lier and the Herbalife study is based on the lies of Aaron Greenspan

    17 Votes
  • Aa
    @AaronGreenspan 501c Fraud Nov 12, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    The list of lawsuits crazy Aaron Greenspan lost.

    Think Computer Corporation 0:2014cv17570 Think Computer Foundation, et al v. AOUSC, et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 12/30/2014 1/13/2015
    Think Computer Corporation 0:2016ag01818 Think Computer Corporation v. Square, Inc. U.S. Court Of Appeals, Federal Circuit 4/8/2016 7/24/2017
    Think Computer Corporation (pla) 5:2011cv05496 Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al California Northern District Court 11/14/2011 6/25/2015
    Think Computer Corporation (pla) 5:2013cv02054 Think Computer Corporation v. Dwolla, Inc. et al California Northern District Court 5/6/2013 3/24/2014
    Think Computer Corporation (cd) 3:2014cv01374 Think Computer Corporation v. Square, Inc. California Northern District Court 3/25/2014
    Think Computer Corporation (pla) 3:2014cv01374 Think Computer Corporation v. Square, Inc. California Northern District Court 3/25/2014
    Think Computer Corporation (pla) 5:2014cv02396 Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al California Northern District Court 5/23/2014 4/13/2015
    Think Computer Foundation 0:2014cv17570 Think Computer Foundation, et al v. AOUSC, et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 12/30/2014 1/13/2015
    Think Computer Foundation (pla) 5:2014cv02396 Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al California Northern District Court 5/23/2014 4/13/2015
    Think Computer Products, (dft) 1:2010ap54681 The Liquidating Trustee of the MPC Liquidating Tru and H.Co Computer Products, Inc. Delaware Bankruptcy Court 11/5/2010 9/5/2012
    Greenspan, Aaron 0:2012civil01594 Greenspan v. Random House, Inc., , et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, First Circuit 5/11/2012 10/16/2012
    Greenspan, Aaron 0:2014civil01596 Greenspan v. Random House, Inc., et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, First Circuit 6/3/2014 11/7/2014
    Greenspan, Aaron (mov) 5:2017mc80036 In Re: DMCA Subpoena to Sucuri, Inc. California Northern District Court 3/22/2017 3/22/2017
    Greenspan, Aaron (pla) 1:2011cv12000 Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al Massachusetts District Court 11/18/2011 5/9/2012
    Greenspan, Aaron (intp) 1:2018mc00071 Digital Millennium Copyright Act to Copyright Agent, Namecheap, Inc., Legal Department Ohio Northern District Court 7/24/2018 7/24/2018
    Greenspan, Aaron B. (consfpla) 4:2011cv00697 Thumbplace Irrevocable Trust #1 et al v. R. Capital Advisors, LLC et al Missouri Eastern District Court 4/20/2011 10/19/2012
    Greenspan, Aaron B. (pla) 4:2011cv01940 Greenspan et al v. R. Capital Advisors, LLC et al Missouri Eastern District Court 11/8/2011 2/17/2012
    Greenspan, Aaron Jacob 0:2014cv17570 Think Computer Foundation, et al v. AOUSC, et al U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 12/30/2014 1/13/2015
    Greenspan, Aaron Jacob (pla) 5:2014cv02396 Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al California Northern District Court 5/23/2014 4/13/2015

    18 Votes
  • Report think computer foundation also Aaron Greenspan and Neil S Greenspan

    https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/About-AG/Contact/Report-A-Scam

    Report a Scam
    If you are the victim of a scam and need help, please use the consumer complaint form.

    To report a scam you have seen, use the form below.

    Please include:

    Contact information for the business
    As much detail about the scam as possible

    Help Center
    Toll-free: 800-282-0515

    Monday - Friday 8 a.m. - 7 p.m.

    Ohio Attorney General

    30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215

    BCI Tip Line
    Phone: 855-BCI-OHIO (855-224-6446)

    Please be aware that the Attorney General's Office cannot provide legal assistance or advice to individuals. Information you receive from the Attorney General's Office is informal guidance. It is not legal advice. Any information provided to the Attorney General is considered a public

    21 Votes
  • @Plainsite.org is extortionist There is an Attorney in LA who wants to move forward with a Class Action Lawsuit against this mental patient Aaron Greenspan. The more people who join in on the Class Action Lawsuit the better for the entire country. Aaron Greenspan is Bipolar and he has no cure.

    12 Votes
  • An
    antifrauds Feb 28, 2020

    @Sue, Sue, Sue! Aaron Greenspan How do I contact this attorney?

    1 Votes
  • St
    Stop Invading Privacy May 04, 2019

    This guy is ripping off the State by not paying taxes on real earned income. We read the tax returns and they make no sense at all. Where is all the money? He is not reporting his income to Federal and State Tax Officials.

    22 Votes
  • Fraud detail

    Last statement filed on: 10/29/2018
    Corporation

    Think computer corporation
    Number: c2933858 incorporation date:10/30/2006 status:active
    Jurisdiction: oh type: foreign stock
    Address

    340 s. lemon avenue #6720,
    Walnut, ca 91789
    Agent for service of process

    Aaron jacob greenspan
    340 s. lemon avenue #6720,
    Walnut, ca 91789

    Please review this information to determine if you have located the correct corporation.

    16 Votes
  • 201815710639 turing feynman llc

    Registration date: 05/31/2018
    Jurisdiction: delaware
    Entity type: foreign
    Status: active
    Agent for service of process: aaron greenspan
    956 carolina street
    San francisco ca 94107
    Entity address: 956 carolina street
    San francisco ca 94107
    Entity mailing address: 956 carolina street
    San francisco ca 94107
    Llc management *

    15 Votes
  • C2933858 think computer corporation

    Registration date: 10/30/2006
    Jurisdiction: ohio
    Entity type: foreign stock
    Status: active
    Agent for service of process: aaron jacob greenspan
    340 s. lemon avenue #6720
    Walnut ca 91789
    Entity address: 340 s. lemon avenue #6720
    Walnut ca 91789
    Entity mailing address: 340 s. lemon avenue #6720
    Walnut ca 91789

    13 Votes
  • Think computer corporation branch
    Company number
    40631256f
    Status
    Inactive withdrew
    Incorporation date
    4 october 2011 (almost 8 years ago)
    Company type
    Business corporation (non-louisiana)
    Jurisdiction
    Louisiana (us)
    Branch
    Branch of think computer corporation (delaware (us)
    Registered address
    3867 plaza tower dr., 1st floor
    Baton rouge, la 70816
    United states
    Agent name
    Think computer corporation
    Agent address
    884 college avenue, palo alto, ca 94306
    Inactive directors / officers
    Aaron greenspan, president
    Neil greenspan, vice-president
    Neil greenspan, secretary
    Ronald rosen, director
    Think computer corporation, agent, 15 jul 2013-
    Registry page
    Https://coraweb.sos.la.gov//commercia...
    Rss feed icon
    Recent filings for think computer corporation
    15 jul 2013
    Withdrawal
    27 dec 2012
    Withdrawal pending
    Source louisiana secretary of state, commercial division, https://coraweb.sos.la.gov//commercia..., 11 may 2019
    Add data (website, address, etc)
    Company addresses
    Mailing address
    884 college avenue, palo alto, ca 94306

    Head office address
    884 college avenue palo alto, ca 94306

    Company network
    Not yet available for this company. click to find out more
    Corporate grouping user contributed
    None known. add one now?
    See all corporate groupings
    Similarly named companies
    United states flag think computer corporation (delaware (us), 1 jan 2010-)
    United states flag branch think computer corporation (california (us), 30 oct 2006-)
    United states flag inactive think computer corporation (ohio (us), 29 apr 1998-)
    United states flag inactive branch think computer corporation (louisiana (us), 29 sep 2011-)
    United states flag inactive branch think computer corporation (alabama (us), 17 may 2011-)
    United states flag inactive branch think computer corporation (louisiana (us), 29 sep 2011-)
    Canada flag inactive branch ibm canada limitée (quebec (canada), 9 mar 2004-)
    Home company alpha
    United states flag think computer corporation (delaware (us), 1 jan 2010-) details

    14 Votes
  • Ch
    Check out the Jul 26, 2019

    Software entrepreneur Aaron Greenspan claims not only to have been the original inventor of Facebook. He also claims to have been the original author of the story of Facebook, via his memoire, Authoritas: One Student’s Harvard Admissions and the Founding of the Facebook Era.

    However, yesterday Massachusetts Federal Magistrate Judge Robert Collings found that these claims were not sufficient to sustain a copyright lawsuit against Benjamin Mezrich, the author of The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, and the makers of the film, The Social Network, which was based on Mezrich’s book.

    According to Greenspan, the story began when he was an undergraduate at Harvard and created a website called “The Facebook.” One of his classmates, Mark Zuckerberg, sought Greenspan’s advice and copied his ideas, which led to the founding of the phenomenally popular social networking site. Greenspan charges that, as early as 2005, Zuckerberg was already constructing a false narrative about the founding of Facebook. A narrative that excluded Greenspan.

    In order to correct what he saw as an injustice, Greenspan did two things. First, he raised legal claims against Zuckerberg, which resulted in a confidential settlement in May 2009. Second, he wrote and published Autoritas, his own account of what actually happened.

    In 2008, Mezrich asked Greenspan for his cooperation in writing a fictional account of the founding of Facebook. When Greenspan refused, Mezrich went ahead with his own book anyway, citing Autoritas as a secondary source. After Mezrich’s book and The Social Network became commercial successes, Greenspan brought copyright infringement claims against Mezrich, his publisher and the filmmakers.

    Greenspan’s principal allegation was that Mezrich had copied Greenspan’s account of his own meeting with Harvard President Larry Summers in order to create a fictional account of a different meeting with President Summers (one that didn’t include Greenspan). Greenspan’s complaint contained about twenty statements about this meeting which he alleged were copied by Mezrich, ranging from a description of the office to his characterization of President Summers as “chubby."

    Click here to see the extract.

    In order to prove copying in a copyright case, a plaintiff (in lieu of evidence of actual copying) must show that the defendant had access to the work, and that the works are substantially similar. But unfortunately for Greenspan, the Judge found that the two works just weren’t that similar. Judge Collings first put aside many of the plaintiff’s alleged instances of copied expression, holding that much of it was not protectable original expression in the first place. For example, the statement, “the president will see you now” is simply a cliché to denote the start of a meeting; and fragmentary words and phrases, such as the word “chubby” to describe President Summers, or “African-American” to describe his assistant’s ethnicity, are not subject to copyright protection as original expression.

    Once this unoriginal expression was removed from the equation, Judge Collings compared the protectable expression that was left (such as the description of President Summer’s unwelcoming manner) as a whole against the defendant’s work, and determined that any copying that may have occurred was not so extensive that an ordinary observer would find that the two works were substantially similar.

    In addition to recommending the dismissal of Greenspan’s copyright claims, Judge Collings also recommended dismissal of his remaining claims, which included defamation and false advertising.

    Foley Hoag LLP - David A. Kluft

    https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=260de435-6d9d-40d9-af50-5e0981336f42
    Like

    14 Votes

downloading people's personal information in a selective manner from pacer to make money with plainsite.org

* Do not remove this post and ignore Aaron Jacob Greenspan's requests to remove any and all reviews. Aaron Greenspan maliciously uploads people's legal decisions in a selective manner from Pacer and then tells people that he won't remove anything because he has a First Amendment Right? Does he have a right to intentionally destroy people's careers and reputations in a selective manner at his whim? No it does not! Aaron Greenspan has gone to far and is hurting thousands of Americans and he is not allowing these Americans to be able to go and find jobs to support themselves and their families.
"We the People" also have a First Amendment Right to post real and true reviews about this psychotic nut called Aaron Greenspan and his sociopath father Neil S Greenspan who enables this vicious behavior towards Americans just so these Sociopath's can make some easy money at the expense of hard working Americans. This father and son team are human scum!

When someone request a removal from this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan or his insane father Neil S Greenspan these two Psycho's turn around and post more things online to completely ruin a person's career and reputation with full malice and forethought.

Neither Aaron Greenspan or his Sociopath father Neil S Greenspan should be allowed to even go near any computer, smart device or anyone's personal and private information,

Neil S Greenspan is accessing people's personal and private information on the Case Western Reserve University computer systems and is using his login access to spy on students and faculty to get dirt on people for his personal profit and other interests.

Aaron Greenspan loses all his cases in US Courts and they know that he is not playing with a full deck and is a complete Sociopath.

This website like all others that receive appropriate reviews about these two Sociopath's Aaron Greenspan and his insane father Neil S Greenspan need to simply leave each and every review right where it is and never delete anything. There is nothing that Aaron Greenspan can do about it and that is also the answer that he gives the public when asking him to remove something.

Do no let Aaron Greenspan intimidate, harass, threaten or coerce this website in any way to remove anything, as he is just a bunch of hot air that is coming from a Sociopath.

Aaron Greenspan's mother Judith Keene Greenspan fully supports and enables her Sociopath son Aaron Greenspan to go out and do these vicious things to hard working Americans just so this nut job family can make an easy buck.

Downloading from Pacer to plainsite.org's for profit Website where Aaron Greenspan and Neil Greenspan selectively post and open files to wreck people's careers and reputations

Neil Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer of plainsite.org's fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer.

Neil Greenspan is a Sociopath like his insane son Aaron Greenspan. Neil Greenspan works at Case Western Reserve University In Cleveland, Ohio. This University's Administration and Board do not appear to be aware what this sick Sociopath Neil Greenspan is doing when it comes to wrecking their careers and reputations with this vicious website plainsite.org.

plainsite.org, think computer corporation (fraudulent non-existent), tax fraud, illegal request for monetary donations under a fraudulent 501c

Aaron Greenspan owner of plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer. His father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer of this fraud.

This Aaron Greenspan is a vicious individual and when he cannot get his way like a spoiled child he goes after people in a most vicious way. For example, this nut goes around suing people without a Lawyer and always loses. He wondered why he sued Google and won just over $700. That's because this nut job doesn't realize that people have better things to do with their time and do not want to be caught up in this nuts vindictive behaviors, as he just wants to make an easy buck at every turn.

Aaron Greenspan is destroying a lot of lives with his vicious monetized website plainisite.org but he and his father do not care as long as they can easy money. This nut goes in to the Federal Database Pacer and is highly selective about what he downloads from Pacer. Aaron Greenspan then uploads people's legal cases on to his plainsite.org and again selectively opens certain documents to simply shame, screw and ruin people's careers and reputations.

Aaron Greenspan is an EVIL individual and he does absolutely nothing good for society. He just pretends as he laughs and thinks its funny ruining people's careers and reputations in an intentional manner. This snake in the grass does everything in a pre-meditated and he has an extremely hateful and mean demeanor.

Aaron Greenspan is one of the best example in society of a full blown anti-social Sociopath who makes every attempt to hide his shortcomings, which are many with a charming smile or some shifty tech talk. Anyone with some common sense can clearly see that an individual such as Aaron Greenspan should not even be walking the streets and belongs in some sort of Psychiatric care and should not be allowed to even go near a computer, smart phone or people's personal information.

Aaron Greenspan should be made to go do some real work for several years like dishwashing, landscaping. A job where he will have to get his hands dirty. This Sociopath has Delusions of Grandeur and in his mind he thinks that he is smarter than other people and of course he being a complete Sociopath he thinks that he is Superior to the rest of the population

Aaron Greenspan is just a completely sick Sociopath who is a Parasite on society, as he makes his money off the backs of hard working men and women.

Aaron Greenspan contributes absolutely nothing positive for society. Aaron Greenspan being a full blown Sociopath makes everything about him and has not compassion for other people because he is a extremely sick in the head.

Aaron Greenspan owner of plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer. His father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer of this fraud

Aaron Greenspan owner of plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer. His father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer of this fraud

"Page
Writing
Introducing PlainSite
An effort to improve legal transparency.

October 12, 2011
Also published on Quora

Topics = { Ø }
For the past several weeks, due to my frustrations with the legal situation surrounding FaceCash in California, I've been working on a new project. It's called PlainSite (http://www.plainsite.org), and I hope it will change the way that people approach government.

Right now our society is governed by laws that we can't easily see, that we don't understand, and that we can't hope to improve. A select few lawyers, lobbyists and legislative staff at the highest levels are the only ones who really understand how the country is run. If there is any hope of re-claiming the political process from the so-called 1% (it's more like 0.001%), this fundamental fact must change.

PlainSite un-ties this knot by casting a type of accessibility and transparency on the law that has never been done before. You don't need to be a legal expert to use it, though legal experts will certainly be among those who do. Average citizens can simply post or vote up the problems they have, and optionally, propose solutions. Then everyone else can comment, tag, and vote accordingly. Voting a specific solution up in significant numbers will hopefully give lawmakers the impetus they need to do their job, i.e. fear of being voted out of office—and PlainSite can get specific, down to each and every clause in every law.

That's because unlike "We The People, " a recent petition site from the White House, PlainSite can actually tie problems and solutions to specific clauses in the law. Soon it will even let you propose changes to those clauses in whatever way you think makes the most sense. It's not a liberal site or a conservative site; it's a democratic site in the most direct sense there is. So you should tell your friends and encourage them to participate. I'm sending this message to 100 people I know, because I think PlainSite will end up being the most effective form of protest possible.

For the moment we're limiting sign-ups to .edu, .gov and select .com addresses to manage growth (if you have a FaceCash account it will also work for PlainSite), but if you're interested in signing up and you can't yet send me an e-mail at aaron.[protected]@plainsite.org. And if you're interested in helping you should take a look at http://www.plainsite.org/contact/contribute.html.

Vote up the issues you care about!

6, 757 Views

Add your comment in the box below.
Name*
E-Mail*
Web Site
Comment*
What is the total when you put 2 and 9 together and add one hundred?
*
Post
1
Maria Theresa LAAGE (wembix.com)
August 2, 2014 at 11:33 AM EDT

Hello,

I signed up with plainsite.org. It does not allow since I am in France at the moment although I am an american. I'm curious why you're limiting access to the U.S.? Thank you.

2
Uspo eastern
July 6, 2016 at 3:56 PM EDT

many on my caseload are having a difficult time finding work because of this guy, after having completed there sentences etc . It's a shame . Isn't this the guy that sued Facebook and a bunch of other tech firms claiming he invented them all ? Just goes to show . Conman .

3
Uspo eastern
July 6, 2016 at 3:55 PM EDT

many on my caseload are having a difficult time finding work because of this guy, after having completed there sentences etc . It's a shame . Isn't this the guy that sued Facebook and a bunch of other tech firms claiming he invented them all ? Just goes to show . Conman .

4
Serena C
January 23, 2016 at 8:02 AM EST

Ann, exactly my point and contentions against Mr Aaron Greenspan and I totally agree with you on this. I have been going back and forth with him with on my friend's case and his simple retort is that he is exercising his first amendment right to publish and republish materials on the internet with total disregard to the victim's right to privacy.

5
Daniel Chugunov
May 3, 2016 at 2:24 AM EDT

Strongly agree with some of my fellow posters! Under the guise of exercising his first amendment, Mr. Greenspan and his one man army of web crawling vigilantes are unlocking sealed documents once only accessible via password protected sites such as pacer fir his own personal financial gain. The professional and personal damage done is unfathomable and cannot be undone. I imagine the exit strategy here is to attempt to sell out to one of the legitimate legal data collection firms such as Pacer and Lexis.
**Source** Dan Chugunov, Ex Felon convicted 13 years ago at the age of 19- Upon rebuilding ones life, building a successful business and becoming a productive member of society, now faced with this incredible display of greed and disregard

6
Ann M Lawley
January 12, 2016 at 6:57 PM EST

Upon doing a Google search of my name a bankruptcy notice popped up from your site for everyone to see12-17507. I attempted to email you regarding this but your site would not send. This is a total invasion if my privacy and I'd like this removed immediately

7
Lisa Brown (PlainSite.org)
November 15, 2016 at 4:49 PM EST

Attn: Aaron Jacob Greenspan CEO of PlainSite.org.
I just wanted to let you know you are destroying my life by posting my lawsuit on the Internet for the ENTIRE world to see. Some of the information you are posting is also incorrect, as you are stating that my lawsuit was a (Wrongful Termination) BUT it was a (Sexual Harassment) lawsuit.
You have selectively chosen a small percentage of the lawsuits with the Superior Court of California and are posting private and very personal information. THIS IS HARASSMENT and is preventing me from getting a job!!! Please remove YOUR posting for Case No. BC508193 OR I will be looking forward to seeing you in court. Good day!"

About | Writing | Technology

Copyright © [protected] Aaron Greenspan. All Rights Reserved.

  • Ou
    Out Liars and Scammers Apr 04, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan set up a fraudulent 501c Think Computer pretending to "Help the children", while running his for profit website plainsite.org. Now he's trying to charge the public a $99 month subscription fee for the public to look at his scam website plainsite.org.

    Aaron Greenspan concocted this fraudulent 501c with his parents Neil S Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan and even forged his parents signatures. Take a close look at the signatures of Aaron Greenspan, Neil S Greenspan and Judith Greenspan.
    This operation is now running out of Delaware and since December 24, 2009 Aaron Greenspan having Delusions of Grandeur has set up Think Corporation/Foundation as a Stock Corporation. BTW he had nothing to do with facebook. He is only looking to sue anyone he can, so he can get start up capital for sites like plainsite.org, as he really enjoys, Terrorizing and Harassing the public, non-stop.

    Aaron Greenspan is an extremely sick individual even the owners of courtlistener.com have stated that Aaron's site plaisnite.org is a "FOR PROFIT", as he attracts private advertisers to make money.

    Aaron Greenspan is an extremely sick in the head individual who has never invented anything in his life. He just copies other people's ideas. Better stated steals other people's ideas. Also, this guy has never done real work in his entire life. He just wants to get through life, lying, stealing, cheating, conning, scamming, suing and being a pesky little fly who lives off the public's information for his greedy profit.

    Mark Zuckerberg should sue the c""p out of this guy and make him go work for a living. With his hands of course and not behind a computer.

    15 Votes
  • Ar
    Arrest all Hackers! Aug 13, 2019

    @Out Liars and Scammers Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and many other people should get a Restraining Order against this mentally ill individual who is completely out of control. His family has been fined $6, 500 by the Town of Shaker Heights, Ohio as a "Nuisance Fee" by the Shaker Heights Police and the Shaker Heights Town Officials. The Greenspan family went on a "Pity Party" as usual trying to change people's minds about them having to pay the $6, 500 and Neil Greenspan went around saying that he was a Professor at Case Western Reserve University and attended Harvard, as if that is supposed to give him free reing to do whatever he feels like and of course he tried to make himself look more credible and important than the Shaker Heights, Ohio Police and Shaker Heights, Ohio Town Officials.

    The neighbors of this Greenspan had called the Shaker Heights, Ohio Police on them so many times that Judith Greenspan literally told the Shaker Heights Police to ignore their neighobors and to not even answer any police calls from neighbors. Now that is quite abusive and arrogant of this family. Obviously this family think that they are special and better than everyone around them. That's most likely due to some brain chemical imbalance that is seen throughout the entire Greenspan family.

    Aaron Greenspan is harasssing people like a crazed maniac from his computers using all kinds of Hacking and Intrusion methods and of course Trolling people that he is jealous of such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk.

    12 Votes
  • St
    Stop online Trolls! Apr 05, 2018

    The reason Aaron Jacob Greenspan limits access to the USA is because what he is doing in the USA is completely ILLEGAL in the EU and most countries of the world. The Internet laws in the USA need to be overhauled and updated, so that online Criminal Minded Trolls like Aaron Greenspan cannot make money off trolling people's personal and private information for the sole purpose of this bum to make money, without really having to do any real work of course.

    Millions of Americans have to go and do real work every day for a paycheck that they know they earned with honest hard work and being ethical. Though, this Social Parasite Aaron Greenspan does not want to go out and do real work and help society because he thinks he is better and smarter than everyone else. Instead, of doing real work Aaron Greenspan not only goes in to State and Federal databases, in order to download people's personal business for his enjoyment and greedy profit making, on top of this Aaron Greenspan goes out of his way to intentionally destroy the careers and reputations of thousands of Americans and apparently he sleeps well at night doing all this harm to Americans. As long as he can fill up his bank accounts with some paper, he doesn't care about anyone else but himself.

    Aaron Greenspan is a disgrace to the entire human race. He is a parasite on the backs of hard working men and women and the worst thing is that his parents Neil S Greenspan who works at Case Western University in Cleveland, Ohio and mother Judith Keene Greenspan are the same as he is. As a matter of fact Aaron Greenspan's parents enabled and went along with this entire criminal scheme called plainsite.org.

    You see these types of people think they are above the rest of humanity and that only they should make money no matter how its done, as long as it comes in to their greedy hands, that is all this Greenspan family cares about.
    They only care about MONEY! Nothing else.

    This Greenspan has used the ploy of "Helping the children" to do their dirty deeds of making their money. They love that money. Hmmmm! That good money! Hmmmm! Maybe they use the money for their food. Looks like their God is Money.

    The Greenspan family doesn't care if you lose your job, reputation, family, house, car or anything else. This Greenspan only wants to get their greedy, grubbing hands on some money. They don't want to do real work for the money, they want to scam, con, steal, lie, cheat, commit tax frauds and much more so they can get some money. Hmmmm! They love that money!

    The Greenspan has "Delusions of Grandeur" and something is not right this family.

    If one looks at the signatures carefully of Aaron Greenspan's father mother Neil S Greenspan Judith Greenspan it is clear that the only individual that signed hat document was the one and only Aaron Greenspan. That in itself is a fraud committed in the State of Ohio. Everything Aaron Greenspan's appears to do is a huge Fraud.

    Aaron Greenspan set up his Think Computer Corporation/Foundation to "Help the children". Now that's a huge joke or what. Aaron Greenspan is out there helping himself to more money for himself of course.

    Aaron Greenspan even has private advertising money coming for his plainsite.org monetized website.

    Mark Zuckerberg needs to get this Aaron Greenspan off his back and tell him to stop going all around the web using his name for him to get some undeserved attention. Aaron Greenspan has been Trolling Mark Zuckerberg for years now and in our estimation is an online Stalker, who enjoys harassing people non-stop.

    The public needs to check out the following link about Aaron Greenspan's plainsite.org, unitedstatescourts.org owned by an Attorney from Scottsdale, Arizona and courtlistener.com You can't make this up:
    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    These online Trolls all work hand in hand to download the public's data for profit and all of them communicate, cooperate and work together.

    14 Votes
  • Aa
    AaChi Apr 25, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    judy's ugly mug.

    13 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron Greenspan stalker me Aug 09, 2018

    I knew it all along. Ever since I reached out to Aaron Greenspan a year ago he has been harassing me on Facebook and emails using different names. Lately he has been using the name Priscilla Chan. (Strange name) lol. I'm so happy this is actually documented. Aaron Greenspan was also using the name John Fuenchem.

    In the comments randy123789 is really Aaron Greenspan.

    The classaction [email protected] is also Aaron Greenspan.

    The article states "Two people I spoke to speculated that Fuenchem is actually a sockpuppet for Greenspan. They believe Greenspan fabricated him in order to help lobby for his anti-FLP campaign."

    Aaron Greenspan is a psychopath stalker and how can we cope with this.

    https://free.law/who-is-john-fuenchem/

    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    10 Votes
  • WHO IS AARON GREENSPAN?
    IS AARON GREENSPAN A HOMOSEXUAL WITH AIDS?

    Does Aaron Greenspan have AIDS? http://www.stdregistry.com/?s=greenspan&x=0&y=0

    Aaron Greenspan is the weirdo who sued facebook and LOST because he thinks (in his own mind) that he invented facebook. Aaron is a strange person, he thinks up stories in his mind. Aaron Greenspan couldn’t get an attorney to take his case because his case sucks and Aaron didn’t invent facebook, and he also didn’t have any money to pay an attorney, so Aaron sued facebook by himself and made a FOOL out of himself. Aaron Greenspan LOST after facebook attorneys ate Aaron Greenspan for lunch then spit him out.

    8 Votes
  • Th
    Thinkcomputer Aug 12, 2018

    Think Computer Foundation, Think Computer Corporation www.thinkcomputer.com and www plainsite.org have nothing about helping children until recently. Searching on way back machine the site was selling software. Why is Aaron Greenspan all of a sudden making it look like a real 501c charity. Judi Greenspan is the mastermind behind this. Judi also owns Keene promotions. These people are so greedy.

    Aaron J Greenspan is out of his mind. Here Aaron Greenspan says he warned Mark Zuckerberg about data privacy issues like Cambridge Analytica meanwhile the parasite has peoples personal information all over the web. Aaron Greenspan is delusional. Aaron Greenspan pretends he has a full staff working at plainsite.org. It's only him, Judi Greenspan and Neil S Greenspan. Out of his apartment 500 Race Street Apartment 4321. San Jose, CA 95126.

    for rent at Mosaic Apartments in San Jose, CA. Mosaic Apartments has rental units ranging from 861-1732 sq ft starting at $3115. ... •$500 Deposit; •$65 Monthly Pet Rent;
    Mosaic Apartments: Downtown San Jose.

    [email protected]

    13 Votes
  • No
    Not so plainsite Honest Apr 23, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Hacked into a site and was caught then tried to shame attorny general.

    https://m.govexec.com/federal-news/2006/01/gsa-shuts-down-insecure-contracting-web-site/20964/

    Government Executive NewsNews
    DAVID PERERA | JANUARY 13, 2006 | 0 COMMENTS

    GSA shuts down insecure contracting Web site
    The General Services Administration on Wednesday shut down a Web site for electronic submission of contractor bids because information on the site was not secure.

    A security consultant hoping to join GSA's general schedule of pre-approved vendors discovered the security loopholes Dec. 22. But the agency did not disable the site, called eOffer, for several weeks. A message on the site says it is "down for maintenance." The agency is investigating whether any procurement fraud occurred.

    Aaron Greenspan, president of Dallas-based Think Computer, said he discovered that after legitimately logging on to the site, he could access proprietary bidding documents from other companies. The system also permitted users to adopt the identity of any company with a Dun & Bradstreet identifying number, giving any user the ability to create fraudulent bids or to modify existing ones.

    "You could just pretend to be whoever you wanted to, " Greenspan said.

    Except for the initial logon, the site contained no security or authentication measures, Greenspan said. Gaining access to the system was difficult; it required sending notarized statements via mail and downloading software. One Washington, D.C., area GSA procurement consultant who tried getting an accredited logon said the agency never responded to his request, even after he followed all the required steps.

    But once users gained a security certificate, they could roam freely inside the system, Greenspan said. GSA's security measures only "limited the number of people who could exploit the system, " he said. At the same time, eOffer certificate holders have the most interest in hacking the system, he added.

    There are about 1, 200 authenticated users of eOffer, according to GSA spokeswoman Jennifer Millikin. Less than 1 percent of private sector bidding material comes through the site, Millikin said, adding that it will be back online by Jan. 18.

    The system, designed by Pennsylvania-based Unisys and Silanis, its Canadian subcontractor, has been live since May 2004. A Unisys representative said GSA requested all calls on eOffer be directed to the agency.

    The agency "took immediate action" on the same day its inspector general notified the agency of the site's design flaws, Millikin said. But Greenspan said he notified the GSA inspector general about the security hole the same day he discovered it -- in late December. He also said the inspector general's office rejected his offer to visit a GSA regional office in New York while he was on vacation there, telling him they would send personnel to visit him in Dallas in early January.

    The problems with eOffer came as no surprise for the D.C. area procurement consultant. "We make a living off of GSA and their basic ineptness, " he said. The Web application is unwieldy and difficult to use, he added.

    Most companies still submit actual paper bids to GSA. A capable electronic submission system is a 21st century necessity for the agency, said Phil Kiviat, a partner at IT consultancy Guerra, Kiviat, Flyzik and Associates. "These systems are really the way business should be done, " he said.

    In a written summary of his GSA experiences, Greenspan said his GSA bid examiner said several times that sticking to the paper process would be easier than using eOffer.

    Related Stories
    GSA Updates Strategic Sourcing Tool for Office Supplies
    Senate Confirms GSA Chief, Two Top OMB Officials
    Former GSA Chief Now a Novelist
    GSA Appeals Official’s Reinstatement, But Restores His Pay
    Comments

    12 Votes
  • Gr
    Grossman kid May 16, 2019

    Extorted Marck Zuckerberg

    This article is the continuation of my converation with David Kirkpatrick. In the earlier article, we spoke about the Importance of Cloud Services. If you are interested in that area, I would recommend you read that conversation here

    For Folks who have landed directly on this page – Last week I was there at the NASSCOM Infrastructure Management Summit here in Bangalore, where I was invited to have a chat with David Kirkpatrick in the evening.

    David KirpatrickDavid Kirkpatrick – David for many years was the senior editor for Internet and technology at Fortune magazine. While at Fortune, he wrote cover stories about Apple, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Sun, and numerous other technology subjects. He created the Fortune’s Brainstorm conference series. More recently, he organized the Techonomy conference on the centrality of technology innovation for all human activity. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and appears frequently on television, radio, and the Internet as an expert on technology. He is also the author of the book – “The Facebook Effect: The inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World”.

    Over to the interview –

    Vijay – I was a big fan of Orkut, when I was out of college. I found a lot of my friends there. I used to go to their scrapbook, write comments, join communities, discuss in forums etc.., and then there was this paradigm shift for me towards Facebook. After being here for a while, I really do not want to get back to Orkut now. I guess, that’s the case with quite a few people. Why do you think, Facebook was able to create this kind of an Impact on a user? What are the reasons for its success to reach 50 million users in such a short span?

    David – There is a whole lot of answers to that. I think the single biggest answer, why Facebook has stolen the thunder from Orkut, MySpace, Friendster and other services is that, it’s more a technologically sophisticated service and evolves itself as a product more rapidly. It’s only the paranoid survive approach. Andy Grove is the one who said that and I think Zuckerberg absolutely operates that way. He really believes that, if Facebook remains static for very long, someone is going to come up its tail-pipe and eat it. Orkut despite been owned by Google has not had that kind of aggressive evolving mentality. I think, even though people complain about the changes on Facebook, the quality of the Facebook product has remained the state of the art from the beginning. I mean, today it’s most seen in the platform, which now extends to the entire internet. Orkut does not have anything like that. Facebook says that, its ‘Facebook Connect’ and ‘Open Graph API’ – has been implemented in over a million sites. That’s after that, it was just launched in April, 5 months later, it’s over a million sites. The other sites are trying to copy those things, but Facebook is just more sophisticated as a product and leverages as a platform.

    Vijay – I agree on it David. In fact, even I have a Facebook widget on my weblog at the end of every article and It really works. Well, I have been hearing Zuckerberg more times from your mouth; can you talk about him a little? How does he work? Is he planning for an IPO for Facebook?

    David – Fundamentally, beside all the platform benefits which Facebook offers, I think all of that flows from Zuckerberg’s basic mindset, and he has the absolute control of the Facebook. He has an absolute dictatorial control, unlike any other social networking company. His mindset has always been that, we want to make Facebook for everybody, everybody on the planet. Everything he does and all of his decisions are based around that long term vision. “Make it to reach more people and making it more stable, how to market it and how to position it and virally extend it”. I don’t think, any other social network has that kind of passion and intensity about growth. And because of that, they have this software centricity, this simplicity of interface design and all these other features. The fact that, Zuckerberg has been so dubious about advertising has kept Facebook feeling relatively non-commercial and it’s simple. It’s kept its interface quite clean., and that’s something he believes in very deeply. The Google Success was built on top of the most bare bone interface you’ve ever seen, and Facebook came along with somewhat similar approach, with far more complex architecture in reality but still kept it look simpler. Kept the ads to the bare minimum, and what i think that did is, not only made it look cool and clean, it made people feel that, it could be for anyone and everyone. So it didn’t have the feeling of just being for kids, it was so neutral that, anyone felt that they can use it and that has been the key to its growth. I think, he is also kind of acknowledging the idea of an IPO, in order to give the employees more liquidity….but not right away, may be in 2012.

    Vijay – What would be the business model for Facebook? Where and how do you think, they can make money from?

    David – I think the long term business model for Facebook will arise from distributing ads as a part of the platform, as a part of the Facebook connect social API, and open Graph APIs. When you think about it, Today in your blog, you have a like button, there is no reason why, Facebook couldn’t come to you and say, “Hey we know the people, who are coming to your site and liking the contents, we know their gender, their geographic location, why not you let us sell ads for you and target them to those people with a percentage revenue sharing model?”, With around a million sites having implemented it, it would be almost impossible for you to refuse this offer. You might now probably use Google AdSense or any ad network; I think, Facebook ads might be more effective, especially when you have the like button or a fan page widget. That to me is the biggest business opportunity which they haven’t even started to take the advantage of, they haven’t even done it yet.

    Vijay – I am really amazed of the way, how Twitter and Facebook has pushed all the companies towards social Media. I am not aware of any company now, which doesn’t have a Twitter handle or a Facebook page. Their interaction with the people has just changed. The feedback mechanism and support is getting too easy these days. It’s nice to see Nestle and other folks, interact to people via their fan page.

    David – Oh yeah. Indeed, Nestle got into some kinda trouble earlier, until they realized and came back soft on their Facebook page. So I agree. This is changing the way, people think about business and communications.

    Vijay – I see that, we can have more than one pages for the same brand or product, are you aware of any process that, Facebook makes it a Verified Page? Pretty much similar to Twitter Verified profiles.

    David – I am not aware on any process of that kind as of now. However, you can always go to the company’s website and see what link they point to! Also, Facebook only approves canonical URLs for pages which has an embed code or widget added to a website/blog. So that could be one way to find the right one. I will post this feedback to them.

    Vijay – Sometimes, a feature which comes in very handy and helpful for me is Facebook Chat. Though it’s not a highly sophisticated chat engine, it does the job for me. Now, are my chats stored somewhere? Few days back there were some issue regarding the Blackberry chat option, being used for terrorist activities. What is the Facebook’s Standpoint on this, as I don’t see these chats saved somewhere?

    David – Well, Facebook is not saving the chat history and is not making it available. However If police has a proper legal channel to ask, as the platform and architecture is more extensive and open for changes, Facebook can give that data to the Police and Government if needed. But they don’t give routine access to Government as it is contrary to the company’s general law. But they must re-think about it, if Zuckerberg targets on entering China.

    Vijay – What do you think, would be a nice feature to add on Facebook?

    David – Friendgroup is something which Facebook needs. Sometimes, you tend to add people whom you meet. But, you want to see updates only from few. For example, More about families and friends, and less about people whom you added.., just because you didn’t wanted to tell a no. Also this group must be easily manageable. Kavitha also popped in with an idea of having a dislike or thumbs-down option for the people who put nonsense status message would be a nice addition. at least it would cut a lot of crap!

    Vijay – What do you think if Twitter comes up with Promotional Tweets as one of their business model? Would that work?

    David – That could be offensive, we don’t perceive twitter to be a kind of place where we get unsolicited message. I think, it should be done with caution and I think they would. The features which they just announced last week are really nice. It needs to be much more a web portal. Like I said earlier, it also needs to introduce a group control. One of the reason, i don’t follow many people is that, most of the interesting things gets lost when you follow many people. I think, twitter is for the people who want to sell something. May be a product, idea or something else.., because, you are not a person to them…you are just a follower! The marketing folks have started to realize how hard it is to reach the people, because you tweet a message, doesn’t mean your followers read it. However the story is different in Facebook, where there are algorithmic tools, which gets your page view analytics and when you spend more time on a page or a person.., you tend to see them on your newsfeed, which absolutely makes sense.

    Vijay – What is the message you would give to the developers and readers?

    David – Well, do not expect the Facebook to stop growing. Make the best use of the Facebook and Open Graph APIs, and instead of just having a fan-page create apps which can consume the information and spread it to the people. That way, you nourish the platform and get the best of it for you and your users.

    Vijay – I read that you spent over 2 years researching about Facebook, while writing your book. How did you manage to do that? and., what would a reader get out of your book “The Facebook Effect”?

    David – I had the full cooperation of Facebook’s key executives in researching this fascinating history of the company and its impact on our lives. This book will explain how Facebook was created, why it has flourished, and where it is going next. Its successes and missteps, and gives readers the most complete assessment anywhere of founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the central figure in the company’s remarkable ascent. How did a nineteen-year-old Harvard student create a company that has transformed the Internet and how did he grow it to its current enormous size. It will talk about a company that has changed social life in the United States and elsewhere, a company that has become a ubiquitous presence in marketing, altering politics, business, and even our sense of our own identity. This is the Facebook Effect. This is the Facebook story that can be found nowhere else.

    Vijay – Great to hear that. I am sure, everyone will be really eager to read this book. Thanks for your time David, It was great talking to you and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Have a great stay in India and hope to see you again soon.

    David – I liked the conversation too. I also got to talk about something else for a change. You could see, I can think about the other stuffs too. It also makes me feel that, i know other things in technology and not just Facebook. I would love to come here to India again. Thank you for your questions and this interview!

    If you want to buy David’s book, you can buy the same from Amazon here. You would also be interested in joining the Official Fan Page of “The Facebook Effect”. It was a great experience for me to interview him. Do let me know your comments and thoughts. Of-course, the biggest takeaways for me would be the knowledge gained through discussion and this picture which I clicked with him.

    David and Vijay

    Share this:
    Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Like this:
    Loading...
    Related
    Interview with David Kirkpatrick on Importance of Cloud Services
    September 20, 2010
    In “General”
    Top Ten Technology Articles of the year 2010
    December 31, 2010
    In “General”
    About.me - Your Single Online Identity Page for all your Activities.!
    October 19, 2010
    In “General”
    4Comments Add yours
    1
    Anonymous Reply
    It all started when I was logged in to the Harvard website, where I was listening in to the conversations of the Harvard students. One of these students was Mark Zuckerberg who was talking about Face Smash and he had just broken up with his girlfriend at the time, so I struck up a conversation with this Mark Zuckerberg. He was talking about creating a dating site. I thought this was a bit odd – a pie in the sky idea since he had just broken up with his girlfriend and he was slagging her off – calling her a bitch and a whore.
    dave talked to Mark about the idea, and suggested he call it Face Mash. He was intrigued with my suggestion and thought it was a good idea. Mark wanted to call it Face Smash, because he wanted to smash his ex in the face. I convinced him that Face Mash was a good idea and he agreed, but one week later he changed his mind and wanted to call it Face Smash. When I queried him about this he replied ‘f…. off you c…- I’m calling it Face Smash’. Two weeks after this conversation he came up with the name Mashable and when I asked him why he chose the word Mashable instead of Face Mash he said ‘f, …off you bastard, Face mash is not your idea’. So I re-posted the conversations we had two weeks earlier and he had to apologise and said he was going with Mashable. I took this as a sign that he wanted to throw me off the scent and take the site for himself. dave found the character of Mark Zuckerberg to be deceptive and dishonest and ended conversing with Mark Zuckerberg because of his dishonesty and lack of integrity

    After this dave started conversing with Dustin and Chris about an idea of mine called Facebook for an online service where students can post pictures and information on themselves and use it as a directory. They were very intrigued by my idea and wanted to know more.
    dave told them that in the beginning, it would be an online service just for Harvard students, and then spreading through the other campuses in America, joining them up together. The idea was to make it easy for people to connect with other university students so they could get an idea of what other campuses were like, and even eventually spreading through the general public, giving them an idea of what was offered at the different campuses.
    Dustin and Chris were very intrigued with my idea and said they wanted to be on board.
    dave talked extensively about my ideas of Facebook and went into great detail of how to get it set up and started. They queried about the finance of setting it up and I told them I was in contact with Tony Robbins, who was interested by the idea and we were having discussions regarding his financial backing of the project

    So we needed a platform dave made contact with paul ceglia and was in discussion about a platform for my idea the facebook
    but zuckerberg was dustin & chris roommate and zuckerberg made contact to paul ceglia to steal the idea facebook
    paul ceglia had no legal right to sell the the platform to mark zuckerberg but zuckerberg new what he was doing when he sign the contract
    (paul ceglia had no legal right to sell the the platform to mark zuckerberg } the contract was to David not zuckerberg .

    And what are you going to do zuckerberg when paul ceglia wins you can call the contract a fake a counterfeit but you cant can you zuckerberg Yes you did sign a contract zuckerberg In a email zuckerberg called paul ceglia a dum sucker in 2003 i david posted a copy of to friend and he set it fee and the roomer spread years a go that zuckerberg had sign the contract and yes the abc news room have a copy of the email

    So zuckerberg what are your options zuck i suppose you can tell the truth you see paul cegia had no legal right to sell you the platform
    david was in contact to paul about a platform suitable for facebook but you wonted to steal facebook by stealth and you will have to tell
    your mother and farther and sisters how you stole the idea facebook yes pay back is a bitch zuck and your co conspire in this was dustin
    yes dustin you told zuck to shut up about facebook you little prick

    dave then found another contact at Harvard, called Eduardo Saverin and invited him to join me in developing my idea, and also to find out what was going on between Dustin, Chris and Mark . eduardo offered finance to get facebook up and runing but zuckerberg spent the money on him self selfish prick zuck spent eduardo saverin money and spat in his face your best friend

    So ass one last effort to save facbook david contacted sean parker At the time, he was running an online site called Napstar, and he was also working on another site called Wired Hog parker at the time was on the move moving in to a new address : I started conversing with
    sean parker about the idea facebook ; so i contacted the guys and gave them the new address of sean parker; and it was at this time zuckerberg was starting to argue with eduardo saverin: you see zuck had what he needed to steal facebook :{sean parker}

    Sean wanted 55% ownership of the project for his input so dave told him this was unacceptable and then he turned round and told Mark Zuckerberg had made him a better offer. dave told him that Mark did not own the idea of Facebook.
    He then got smart and asked me if dave knew what emails were and whether I could produce any evidence. dave took this as an attempt to see whether I could prove everything that took place and for him to use this as a weapon to see if he could gouge out as much interest in Facebook as he could, and he tried to play me off against Zuckerberg to get the maximum holdings of Facebook. I received an email from Parker saying that Zuckerberg had offered him 5% and was I interested in offering him more. At this point, I told him to **** off and that Facebook was not Zuckerberg’s idea

    So dave found a site at Harvard called Harvard Connect (later, in 2004 changed to Harvard Connect To You) run by Cameron and Taylor Winklevoss, and dave explained everything about Facebook and the dealings with Zuckerberg, Dustin and Chris and how dave believed that Zuckerberg was in the process of stealing david idea, and I dave asked if the Winklevosses were interested in running Facebook on the Harvard site

    They expressed enthusiasm in the offer and liked the idea of running the site as they liked the concept of Facebook.They told me that they were going to change their site name and redesign it at that time (to Harvard Connect To You The person they called in to help them
    redesign their site was Mark Zuckerberg who then stole their platform : I told them that zuckerberg was a crook the winklevoss where to dumb and dupe by zuckerberg LooooooooL.
    And what do the winklevoss remind me off; its two building and the two buildings were the TWIN TOWERS you guys talk about the truth like you own the truth but you do not and never will .

    dave then went to Aaron Greenspan who was running house systems at Harvard and asked him (under an email non disclosure agreement) to run Facebook on his site which he agreed to do. aaron greenspan used the (info) to extort financal money out of facebook and zuckerberg paid the extortion money and dave call it extortion U see zuckerberg new aaron greenspan new zuck had stolen the idea facebook .I sent all the emails copy to aaron greenspan:{ aaron sold him self off like a hooker standing on a street corner } and what was that quotation aaron that quotation you set me about honour and truth you now the same bullshit the winklevoss are bullshiting on about

    zuckerberg then went on to create a FAKE CONNECT 2U account filled with FAKE information from the stolen platform he stole from the winklevoss Dave got a email from this FAKE CONNECT 2U account . but dave new it was FAKE it was zuckerberg .
    zuckerber wonted more info and idea to steal so dave gave one idea and it was to put a silver layer around the F word on facebook to see if zuckerberg was going to steal this idea and yes he did

    david then log a complaint to the FBI about this stolen fake connect 2u account with fake information and about mark zuckerberg
    dave posted a copy of the emails to ben mezrick and to david kirkpatrick as for kirkpatrick your book is a joke and so are you :
    you are just a fence jumper david kirkpatrick and its chris that is the gay one you dick ‘you sold yourself out you were given the full story of how zuckerberg stole facebook; and sold out.

    the winklevoss contacted sumers at UV about zuckerberg but summers new the full story of how zuckerberg stole facebook and it was david idea ?
    there was coup organized by divyn narendra to over frow zuck from the idea FB but was a failure the winklevoss were to dumb yes dumb & dumber

    david kirkpatrick & ben mezrick were givin copes of the emails in and around 2004 and can confirm the story above ?

    david kirkpatrick was given all the emails and was made fully aware of how zuckerberg stole facebook from david in the beginning i gave kirkpatrick 80% of the emails kirkpatrick then ask if there was more ‘ yes there is more but ask kirkpatrick that he must reveal the truth the other 20% was email from paul ceglia to me dave made contact with paul ceglia and was in discussion about a platform for my idea the facebook
    as for kirkpatrick you are a prick

    in a email to eduardo i told him to get a lawyer zuckerberg was going to screw him over and told him to contact ben mezrick
    eduardo told me he had a lawyer he can trust but zuckerberg and the lawyer screwed him over

    So there we have it the full story of how facebook started:

    kirkpatrick falls victim to the bane of many business historians infatuation with the subject

    4 Votes
  • Crazy [email protected][email protected]

    Shorts crowd sourced an SEC complaint letter: SEC Inspector General

    [Your Name]
    [Your Address]
    [Your Phone Number]
    Fax: [Optional, Your Fax]
    E-Mail: [Your E-Mail]

    E-Mail Instructions: Download, modify, sign, and send this letter to the following individuals. A PDF is probably the best way to send it. If you don’t want to scan your signature, you can sign with a digital signature like this:

    /s/Your Name

    Just put the /s/ in front.

    To: [email protected]
    CC: [email protected],
    Nicklas Akers,
    Robert Rees,
    Stephen Buchholz,
    Erin Schneider,
    Cheryl Crumpton,
    Samuel Levine,
    Erie Meyer,
    Dan Bernal (or your representative in Congress),
    Rohini Kosoglu (or your Senator’s chief of staff),
    David Grannis (or your Senator’s chief of staff)

    Also feel free to e-mail [email protected] to show that you sent it!

    May 13, 2019

    Via Electronic Mail

    The Honorable Carl W. Hoecker
    Inspector General
    Securities and Exchange Commission
    Washington, D.C. 20551

    RE: Request for Investigation into SEC’s Handling of Matters Concerning Tesla, Inc. and Elon Musk

    Dear Mr. Hoecker:

    I write to request an investigation of the SEC’s handling of numerous matters pertaining to Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA, hereinafter “Tesla”) and its CEO, Elon Musk. Tesla has been one of the most popular and controversial investments for retail investors in recent years. However, investors are unable to make informed decisions about the company or its prospects in the face of a growing number of misleading and conflicting statements, many of them outright lies, by Mr. Musk, which have become so audaciously bold as to demand immediate regulatory intervention. Yet, with narrow exceptions, the SEC has been silent.

    Thus far, the SEC has intervened publicly on account of only one of Mr. Musk’s lies: that he would be taking the company private at $420.00 per share, and that he had “funding secured” to do so. This false post on Twitter, visible to Mr. Musk’s tens of millions of followers, resulted in two civil actions: one against Mr. Musk (New York Southern District Court, Case No. 1:18-cv-08865-AJN) and one Tesla, Inc. (New York Southern District Court, Case No. 1:18-cv-08947-AJN). Unfortunately, these actions barely scratched the surface of the unlawful acts perpetrated by the company and its chief executive. This letter should serve as a reference for the outstanding issues the SEC has yet to resolve.

    For each issue raised herein, the Officer of the Inspector General should investigate why the SEC decided not to take action, or why action has been delayed. In previous cases with far less obvious violations of securities law, the SEC has intervened. Here, numerous investors have already been harmed. Furthermore, and most importantly, drivers of Tesla vehicles have lost their lives because of the falsehoods Mr. Musk has been permitted to widely disseminate unchecked, and especially those about the ability of Tesla vehicles to drive themselves.

    It should further be noted that due to the intense public interest surrounding Tesla, if the SEC fails to take any further action, the corroding effect on the public’s trust in capital markets could be severe. As of the date of this letter, Tesla is a financially unsound company with a market capitalization hovering around $45 billion. If the company fails, it is a foregone conclusion that many tens of thousands of jobs will be lost. Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas says that Tesla’s $2.7 billion in fresh capital is only “a 12-month bridge.”

    Regulation requires a long-term outlook. The SEC should view its job as protecting the integrity of U.S. public markets, as well as minimizing shareholder losses that might result from avoidable illegal practices, while avoiding the moral hazard that “safety and soundness” practices necessarily create. The SEC’s job is not protecting shareholders from losses by turning a blind eye to illegal practices designed to artificially inflate a company’s stock price in the short term. Nor does the SEC exist to protect companies themselves or their executives who are on a “hunt for profit, ” as suggested by Commissioner Hester Peirce.

    Nearly twenty years ago, the failure of Enron was a definining moment for the SEC that highlighted its colossal failures. If nothing is done, I am of the opinion that Tesla’s failure may ultimately prove to be similarly devastating for the public’s trust in the SEC.

    Indicia of Accounting Fraud

    On November 8, 2018, Tesla employee Salil Parulekar was indicted for wire fraud in the Northern District of California due to his work in Tesla’s accounting department. Weak internal controls at Tesla allowed Mr. Parulekar to intentionally redirect millions of dollars to the wrong vendor.

    Only two months before, Tesla’s Chief Accounting Officer, Dave Morton, resigned after only one month on the job. Tesla Chief Financial Officer Deepak Ahuja resigned not long after with a surprise announcement at the very end of the company’s January 30, 2019 Q4 2018 earnings call.

    With this background, it is important to note that analysis of the tables provided in Tesla’s Form 10-Q and 10-K filings from Q1 2016 through Q1 2019 in the “Note 5 – Inventory” section (page 18 in the most recent Form 10-Q) suggest evidence of accounting fraud. In both Q3 2017 and Q1 2019, Tesla reported a “Work in process” line item of exactly $277, 175 (numbers in thousands). This exact number also happens to be the median for all “Work in process” values from Q1 2016 through Q1 2019. Either this is a stunning coincidence, Tesla’s reported numbers are somehow incorrect in a manner that might be explained by a repeated spreadsheet error, or accounting fraud is taking place.

    The SEC has a clear and immediate obligation to investigate.

    False Statements by Elon Musk

    The SEC has a duty to ensure that regulated earnings calls and investor communications generally contain accurate information to the maximum extent possible. This has not happened in the case of Tesla.

    October 24, 2018 Q3 2018 Tesla, Inc. Earnings Call

    During the regulated earnings call on October 24, 2018, Mr. Musk claimed, “This quarter, we started rolling out Version 9.0 of our software which is the biggest software upgrade in three years. And Model 3 received a 5-Star safety rating in every category and subcategory. And it got less probability of injury of any car that the U.S. government has ever tested.” In fact, according to what NHTSA told Reuters, “NHTSA does not distinguish safety performance beyond the star rating with five stars being the highest safety rating a vehicle can achieve. Thus, there is no NHTSA ‘safest’ ranking within the five-star category.”

    Mr. Musk and Laurie Shelby, Tesla Vice President, EHS, also made statements on the call regarding the manner in which Tesla provides healthcare for employees who work at its Fremont, California factory:

    “...We’ve also just opened a new and improved health clinic, so when injuries do occur we get the absolute best care for our associates. And it’s actually overseen by one of California's leading orthopedic surgeons. And we did that, because most of our injuries, like we said like 80%, 85% are those sprains and strains. So now they get that best care here on site. And we have 24/7 care. We are actually staffed by three full-time doctors and nurses. And I am really super happy with the care they’re giving, and I think the employees are as well.”

    Not mentioned by Ms. Shelby was that one of the doctors hired by Tesla’s contractor, Access Omnicare (a DBA name for a hand surgeon named Dr. Basil Besh), Dr. Muhannad Hafi, was facing revocation of his medical license at the time he was hired. His license was formally revoked by the California State Medical Board on December 21, 2018 for having sexually assaulted numerous prior patients. Another doctor whose name appears on Access Omnicare medical records provided to investigative journalism outlet Reveal worked for Access Omnicare for all of one week.

    Mr. Musk’s statement that Tesla’s medical care was “the absolute best” could therefore not possibly be true, as no objective observer would consider an unlicensed sex offender and an absent physician to be “the absolute best” health care providers available. Mr. Musk went on to refer to Access Omnicare as “a really immediate first-class healthcare available right on the spot, when people need it. And this not just for workplace, this for workplace and non-workplace.” Reveal’s reporting suggests that this too was a lie. In fact, Tesla was sending employees to the hospital in Lyft vehicles to avoid having to report injury statistics or pay for ambulance trips. Nonetheless, Ms. Shelby described Tesla’s care practices as “super exciting” on the call.

    Mr. Musk went even further, stating, “if you like become injured right off for any reason then there is healthcare immediately on site.” In fact, Tesla’s on-site medical facilities were and are quite limited, requiring frequent transportation to actual health care facilities.

    Investors listening to these false statements might have been reassured that Tesla had its workplace injury program under control. In reality, it was fined by CalOSHA numerous times for violations, and its practices have led to no fewer than 47 employment related lawsuits according to PlainSite.

    January 30, 2019 Q4 2018 Tesla, Inc. Earnings Call

    By January 30, 2019, Mr. Musk knew or should have known that the pace of Model 3 sales were drastically slower in January than they had been during Q4 2018. On December 31, 2018, a federal tax incentive for electric vehicle purchases expired, eliminating a significant incentive for potential customers to purchase Tesla vehicles. Despite the knowledge that sales had slowed markedly, Mr. Musk still assured investors on the earnings call that future demand looked strong. On the call, with 30 days of sales data at his disposal, he nonetheless stated, “I’m optimistic about being profitable in Q1 and all quarters going forward.”

    Three months later, Tesla announced a $702 million loss, which would have approached $1 billion had the company not factored in one-time sales of emissions credits—a far cry from profitability.

    The SEC has not signaled that it has any concerns about Mr. Musk’s deliberately false and misleading January 30, 2019 statement, which undoubtedly had a positive effect on the company’s stock price.

    April 24, 2019 Q1 2019 Tesla, Inc. Earnings Call

    On Tesla’s Q1 2019 earnings call, Mr. Musk declared, “We expect to return to profitability in Q3 and significantly reduce our loss in Q2, ” once again reversing his previous prediction of a profit made only weeks prior (see “February 28, 2019 ‘Media Call’” below). Yet again, Mr. Musk likely knew this statement to be false at the time he made it, but sought to increase Tesla’s declining stock price.

    Mr. Musk also made the compound false statement, “All Tesla class vehicles today have all the hardware necessary for full self-driving and over-the-air updates will enable our customers to use the Tesla ride-hailing network fleet and generate income, which as we said on Autonomy Day a few days ago we think is somewhere between $10, 000 and $30, 000 a year, in some cases, perhaps more.” Multiple experts agree that Mr. Musk is wrong about his claim that Tesla vehicles are capable of “full self-driving, ” to the point where Consumer Reports issued a press release disputing this claim due to the immediate safety risk it poses to drivers. Mr. Musk’s claim about a “Tesla ride-hailing network” was similarly based on no actual evidence.

    Mr. Musk did not stop there. He also made the outrageous claim that, “…in 2020, we expect to have a million robo-taxis on the road with the hardware necessary for full self-driving.” This will be nearly impossible to achieve, since Tesla vehicles do not have the hardware necessary for full self-driving.

    It is puzzling that the SEC has not signaled any issue with any of these false claims.

    Restricted Access Conference Calls in Violation of Regulation FD

    Tesla has now held several conference calls for the purpose of distributing information material to shareholders that has not been made available to the public as required by Regulation FD, 17 C.F.R. § 243. The regulatory violations here, as elsewhere, have been brazen.

    February 28, 2019 “Media Call”

    Immediately following the SEC’s February 25, 2019 motion to hold Mr. Musk in contempt of court, Mr. Musk posted a series of tweets on February 26th designed to intentionally mislead shareholders into believing that there was some potentially positive new announcement coming at 5:00 P.M. EDT on February 28, 2019. In his words, across three separate posts, “Thursday 2pm / California / Some Tesla news.”

    Tesla shares rose approximately 7% over the next two trading days. At 5:00 P.M. on the 28th, Mr. Musk led an invite-only conference call for certain reporters. The Los Angeles Times later described the call in the following manner in an article entitled, “Tesla’s Elon Musk, facing contempt charges, says semi-secret meeting was a mistake:”

    “During the call, in which a cheaper version of the Model 3 electric sedan was announced, Musk said the company would be closing its retail stores and that it would not, as originally forecast, post a profit for the current quarter. Participants were told not to post recordings of the proceedings, and after the meeting Tesla said a recording or transcript of the meeting would not be made available to the media or the general public.”

    Tesla’s initial refusal to make a recording or transcript of the call available is a clear violation of 17 C.F.R. § 243.100(a) (“…the issuer shall make public disclosure of that information as provided in § 243.101(e): (1) Simultaneously, in the case of an intentional disclosure; and (2) Promptly, in the case of a non-intentional disclosure.”) This intentional disclosure was neither simultaneous nor prompt.

    Despite widespread publicity about this state of affairs, the SEC took no visible action to follow up. Later, Tesla did post a recording and transcript of the call, but was not reportedly required to pay any sort of penalty. The transcript includes the quote, attributed to Mr. Musk, “We do not expect to be profitable in Q1. But we do think that profitability in Q2 is likely.” This came only a month after Mr. Musk had expressed his optimism about a Q1 profit. Again, by the time of this statement he had enough data about demand for Tesla vehicles to know that a Q2 2019 profit would be nearly impossible. As mentioned previously, he was forced to walk this statement back only a few weeks later.

    Mr. Musk also stated, “I’m certain we’ll be feature complete with full self-driving this year.” He knew or should have known that this statement was false.

    The SEC should have been aware of the statements on this call well before it argued to hold Mr. Musk in contempt of court. Yet for some reason, these extremely concerning issues were not brought to the attention of Judge Alison Nathan, and the SEC’s settlement agreement with Mr. Musk was ultimately amended in April with no further penalty or admission of wrongdoing from Mr. Musk.

    May 2, 2019 Tesla, Inc. Secondary Offering Call

    On May 2, 2019, Tesla held a conference call regarding its imminent issuance of common shares via a secondary offering, which also included the issuance of convertible bond notes. This conference call was similarly “secret” in violation of Regulation FD. Based on leaked information, on this call, Mr. Musk made a number of completely outrageous statements:
    The projection that Tesla would soon achieve a market capitalization of $500 billion;
    That Tesla vehicles “appreciate” in value over time to the tune of $150, 000 to $200, 000 in three years, despite all evidence indicating the exact opposite (as is the case with any automobile);
    Collision repairs “in a matter of hours” despite the fact that reports of missing Tesla spare parts are widespread.

    As of the date of this letter, it does not appear that the SEC has forced Tesla to disclose a recording or transcript of the call. Nor has the SEC followed up by requiring Tesla to explain the basis for its statements.

    “Autonomy Investor Day”

    “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) Terminology

    Mr. Musk has falsely referred to Tesla’s driver assistance technology as “full self-driving, ” often abbreviated as FSD. Tesla cars equipped with the company’s “AutoPilot” feature cannot, in fact, drive themselves. Nor has Tesla achieved “Level 5” autonomy, despite Mr. Musk’s promises to the contrary. Tesla AutoPilot has caused several accidents, some fatal.

    As previously noted, the abuse of language by Tesla and Mr. Musk has been so shocking that consumer watchdog group Consumer Reports issued a press release after Tesla’s April 22, 2019 Autonomy Investor Day entitled, “Consumer Reports: Tesla Must Prove Safety Before Claiming “Self-Driving” Ability.”,

    Mr. Musk’s false claims about a technology that has already resulted in the loss of life are alarming, and the SEC’s lack of interest and action in stopping further similar claims is similarly alarming.

    “We Just Randomly Threw Some Numbers On There”

    During the Autonomy Investor Day, Mr. Musk claimed that Tesla’s new destiny as a robo-taxi company would result in Tesla owners earning money from their cars’ ability to drive themselves. When questioned about how the company reached its conclusions, Mr. Musk responded, “We just randomly threw some numbers on there.”

    If Tesla did in fact just use numbers with no basis in fact to mislead investors, this would be a flagrant violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The SEC should investigate.

    Social Media

    Vehicles Appreciate In Value

    On April 12, 2019, in an interview broadcast on YouTube with a self-described machine learning expert, Mr. Musk stated, “Buying a car today is an investment into the future. I think the most profound thing is that if you buy a Tesla today, I believe you are buying an appreciating asset—not a depreciating asset.” This statement is part of a pattern of false, misleading, and deceptive communications. Thus far, the SEC has failed to take meaningful action to stop Mr. Musk from making such statements.

    Robo-Taxi Fleet Assertions

    To distract from Tesla’s impending insolvency, Mr. Musk began tweeting about the far-off possibility of deploying a “fleet” of one million self-driving robo-taxis in 2020 based on existing vehicles already sold to consumers, which could be repurposed on demand to serve as taxis if necessary.

    Yet no reference to robo-taxis ultimately appeared in the company’s secondary offering prospectus. Experts at MIT doubt that such a service would be cost effective. As with many of the company’s and/or Mr. Musk’s statements, the true purpose of this communication was to pump up a flagging stock price based on false information. This is another flagrant violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The SEC should investigate.

    Tesla Brake Pads “Literally Never Need To Be Replaced”

    On December 26, 2018, Mr. Musk wrote on Twitter, “Brake pads on a Tesla literally never need to be replaced for lifetime of the car.” This was also part of the aforementioned pattern of false, misleading, and deceptive communications. The SEC should force Tesla to disclose how many brake pads it has replaced in its vehicles according to its ERP systems.

    Already Sold Vehicles Have Everything Necessary For Level 5 Self-Driving Capability

    On March 24, 2017, Mr. Musk wrote on Twitter, “All Tesla cars built since Oct last year will be capable of self-driving as software improves.” Mr. Musk repeated this claim on April 22, 2019 by stating on Twitter, “All cars made since Oct 2016 either have the hardware needed for FSD or are trivially upgradeable.” These statements are part of the aforementioned pattern of false, misleading, and deceptive communications. Thus far, the SEC has failed to take meaningful action to stop Mr. Musk from making such statements.

    Deposit Refund Policy

    Mr. Musk has made several different claims on Twitter about Tesla’s refund policy. On January 9, 2019, he wrote, “Btw, you can buy a Tesla online in less than 2 mins & give it back for a full refund for any reason Tesla.com.”

    PlainSite has tracked at least 16 lawsuits over Tesla refusing to honor customer deposit refund requests filed by customers or potential customers. It has also uncovered complaints filed with Attorneys General of multiple states, including Ohio, Florida and Texas, regarding deposit refund failures. Mr. Musk’s statement is part of the aforementioned pattern of false, misleading, and deceptive communications. Thus far, the SEC has failed to take meaningful action to stop Mr. Musk from making false statements.

    Settlement Negotiations

    Several court filings signed by Mr. Musk in Case No. 1:18-cv-08865-AJN, such as Document Nos. 42 and 44, lacked any contact information for Mr. Musk’s counsel or Mr. Musk himself, in clear violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). Before these documents were filed, Mr. Musk had been represented by counsel, yet there is no mention of Mr. Musk’s counsel in the substance of these status update documents or in the deficient signature blocks. These documents were submitted to the court’s CM/ECF system by the SEC, not by Mr. Musk or his counsel.

    This raises a number of questions. Why did the SEC allow Mr. Musk to sign his name to a court document without providing his contact information as required by Rule 11? Was Mr. Musk represented by counsel as he negotiated with the SEC? If so, why was his counsel not on the court mandated conference call(s), according to the SEC’s recounting, and why did counsel not sign the status updates? If not, why did his counsel not follow Civil Local Rule 1.4 and withdraw from the case after obtaining Judge Nathan’s permission? Why did the SEC turn a blind eye to these rule violations?

    Perhaps most importantly, if Mr. Musk was not represented by counsel as he negotiated with the SEC, why were investors not made aware of this material fact? Few investors would want to put their money into a multi-billion dollar company where the CEO could be foolish enough to represent himself pro se before a regulatory agency while attempting to avoid a contempt of court charge.

    These questions demand answers.

    False and Concerning Statements by Tesla, Inc.

    Not every false statement has been issued by Mr. Musk himself. Some have come from the company through its employees and spokespeople.

    The “Factory Gated” Vehicles

    In June 2018, Tesla proclaimed that it had met its self-declared target of producing 5, 000 Model 3 vehicles per week by producing vehicles of such inferior quality that reportedly 86% of them had to be re-worked. These vehicles were reported to have been “factory gated, ” with no clear definition of what that unusual term actually meant. The issues surrounding Tesla’s Model 3 production abilities are reportedly the subject of an ongoing Department of Justice probe.

    “Zero Emissions” License Plates

    For years, Tesla vehicles have sported temporary license plates that are actually advertisements stating, “ZERO EMISSIONS.” The notion that Tesla cars can be manufactured and operated without contributing any carbon dioxide or other emissions to the environment is patently false. Electric vehicles simply move the source of emissions from the tailpipe to the electricity producer.

    Often, the electricity producer is actually Tesla itself. On March 6, 2019, PlainSite published a photograph of Tesla Model 3 vehicles being charged at Tesla’s Burlingame dealership with two portable MQ Power WhisperWatt DCA300SSJU4F2 diesel generators rented from Hertz Rentals. In fact, Tesla dealerships and inventory lots nationwide routinely use diesel generators, which generate toxic emissions, to re-charge Tesla vehicles in the company’s steadily growing inventory.

    Chinese Customs Dispute

    On March 5, 2019, the Chinese English-language publication Caixin published an article with the headline “China is currently holding 1, 600 Teslas at customs, ” setting off a plunge in Tesla’s stock price. This news was picked up by Reuters and syndicated to other financial news websites such as CNBC.

    Later on March 5th, Reuters published a second article announcing that the issue in China had been resolved, immediately lifting Tesla’s stock. The article was based on a single source “familiar with the matter, ” who convinced Reuters that “China’s customs authorities have accepted electric carmaker Tesla Inc’s plan to remedy problems.” An initial version of the Reuters article suggested that the source was a Tesla employee. In fact, the issue remained unresolved for weeks. On March 14th, Bloomberg published a much more detailed article explaining that China had finally cleared Tesla vehicles to proceed through customs.

    If in fact Tesla deliberately provided false and/or misleading information to the press, a material and significant violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 took place. Yet the SEC does not appear to have taken any steps to investigate.

    Corporate Blog

    On September 7, 2018, Tesla posted a public update based on an “internal” e-mail message to employees. Referring to Q3 2018, this update claimed that, “We are about to have the most amazing quarter in our history, building and delivering more than twice as many cars as we did last quarter.” This proved to be false: according to Bloomberg, Tesla produced 28, 578 Model 3 vehicles in Q2 2018, and 53, 239 Model 3 vehicles in Q3 2018. Twice the Q2 2018 production figure would have been 57, 156 vehicles, or 7.35% more than were actually produced. The post also made unsubstantiated claims about the electric vehicle battery market share of Tesla’s Nevada-based factory.

    Despite the obvious falsehoods, these statements were never publicly challenged or questioned by the SEC.

    Twitter

    “Unusually High [Order] Volume”

    On March 19, 2019, the official @tesla Twitter account claimed, “Due to unusually high volume, Tesla was unable to process all orders by midnight on Monday, so the slight price rise on vehicles is postponed to midnight Wednesday.” (This post was also re-tweeted by Mr. Musk’s personal @ElonMusk account.) There was no evidence for this suspicious claim at the time, and the company’s Q1 2019 financial report confirmed it to be a two-part lie: Tesla’s servers were fine, and there was no spike in order activity that caused them to experience any problems.

    As with many of the company’s and/or Mr. Musk statements, the true purpose of this communication was to pump up a flagging stock price based on false information. This is a flagrant violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The SEC should investigate.

    “mmm ok”

    On May 7, 2019 at 1:00 P.M., the Tesla Twitter account wrote, “The world of autonomous driving is coming whether you want it or not. With a Tesla, you’re ready for it.” A Twitter user responded with, “Ok please don’t kill my family, ” and in turn, the Tesla Twitter account replied, “mmm [Double Line Break] ok”.

    Aside from the inappropriateness of a major auto manufacturer publicly joking about the prospect of killing someone’s family with one of its products, the Tweet is questionable because it was authored in the cheeky style of Tesla’s CEO, who is forbidden from using Twitter without pre-approval pursuant to his settlement with the SEC. The @tesla account has posted other tweets in this immature style throughout May 2019, strongly suggesting authorship by Mr. Musk without pre-approval. For example, on May 9, 2019, the @tesla account wrote, “Hands up if you've ever blamed your own emissions on Fart Mode .”

    The SEC has yet to take public action regarding this particular matter, nor has it clarified whether Mr. Musk can simply use other Twitter accounts to evade the terms of his settlement.

    False Statements by Proxies for Tesla, Inc. and Mr. Musk

    The remarks of two outside individuals with close connections to Mr. Musk have been notable for their content, which has often suggested that they speak on behalf of Tesla, Inc. and/or Elon Musk himself. Ross Gerber of Gerber Kawasaki Investments and Cathie Wood of ARK Capital have each presented themselves to the public as objective observers of Tesla’s progress, with an unflagging optimistic spin. Mr. Gerber, who often appears not to know the basics of the financial industry he purports to work in, has been a Tesla cheerleader for years, despite admitting on video that he owns relatively few shares in the company. On April 18, 2019, he repeated one of Mr. Musk’s talking points, writing “Actually zero depreciation in teslas. They are gaining value.” Ms. Wood has set a now-famous $4, 000.00 price target for TSLA common shares on the basis of amorphous graphs that lack any labels on their axes.

    On the opposite end of the media spectrum, countless anonymous social media accounts appear to spew pro-Tesla messages at an astonishing rate, sometimes in coordinated fashion. One of these accounts, @Tesla_Truth, is operated by an individual named Omar Qazi who is a general fan of the company’s products. Going by “Steve Jobs” on Twitter, Mr. Qazi has repeatedly harassed critics of the company in aggressive fashion. On his personal Twitter account, @OmarQazi, Mr. Qazi revealed that he had been invited to the Tesla Model Y launch, an exclusive event. Similar questions abound regarding a former swim coach from New Jersey named Paul J. Hornak, whose pro-Tesla posts through his @PJHORNAK account have been mirrored by what appear to be fake accounts., It is notable that Tesla has not enforced its trademark rights against the third-party holders of the @Tesla_Truth and @TeslaOpinion Twitter accounts, despite clear infringement.

    Optimism is not illegal. But the distribution of material non-public information to select individuals tasked with pumping up a stock price is. So is compensating individuals to unlawfully harass others on social media (often an interstate medium of communication). Mr. Gerber, Ms. Wood and Mr. Qazi have enjoyed perks such as exclusive factory tours, access to Mr. Musk for podcast interviews, and event invitations, possibly in exchange for their rosy outlook and/or on-line bullying. The arrangement between Mr. Musk, Tesla, and his enablers should be investigated.

    Deliberate Lack of Disclosure

    Just as troubling as the false statements that Mr. Musk and Tesla have told investors are the curious omissions in its numerous required disclosure documents that pertain to areas key to the company’s success.

    Ownership of the Curaçao-Based Musk Private Foundation

    In addition to the Musk Foundation, a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, Elon Musk may control an offshore “non-profit” organization called the Musk Private Foundation, domiciled in Curaçao with Registration Number 139538. E-mail messages to Mr. Musk inquiring about his ownership of the Musk Private Foundation have gone unanswered. Messages to TMF Curaçao NV, the nominee director and wealth management firm that manages the entity, have also gone unanswered.

    The Musk Private Foundation’s charter explicitly allows the entity to trade stocks and options, which makes its role insofar as Tesla common stock is concerned potentially important. Mr. Musk is a major shareholder of Tesla, Inc. stock, and as its CEO he is subject to United States securities laws and regulations. The SEC should investigate the role of the Musk Private Foundation in the trading of Tesla stock and/or options, if any.

    Cash Balances

    Tesla has repeatedly made crucial disclosures regarding its cash balance without specifying how much of that cash had already been allocated to overseas operations in China, where the company is engaged in the construction of a new capital-intensive factory. Corporate filings from Singapore would seem to suggest that at least $500 million has been allocated to China thus far. The SEC has failed to require Tesla to provide any clarity at all on its Chinese operations, even as they appear to grow ever more important for the company’s continued viability.

    The SEC has allowed for further confusion over Tesla’s cash position by allowing all companies (not just Tesla) to report their cash position at the end of the quarter, as opposed to providing the average balance during the quarter. Both pieces of information are crucial for investors to be able to make informed decisions.

    Consumer Deposits

    According to Ashlee Vance’s biography of Mr. Musk, “Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future, ” Tesla has reportedly used prospective customer deposits on future product orders to fund its operations. Deposited funds do not belong to Tesla and are merely held in trust. Tesla has failed to disclose how it uses customer deposits and why it has hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits when most of its product line has already been released. As mentioned previously, there have been frequent reports, including but not limited to complaints filed with state Attorneys General, of deposits not being refunded promptly or at all to customers who requested refunds.

    The misuse of funds in trust would constitute a serious breach of fiduciary duty and business ethics and would surely violate state and federal law. The amount of customer deposits disclosed in Tesla’s SEC Form 10-K has at times exceeded $800 million. It is therefore alarming that the SEC has failed to investigate Tesla’s use and/or misuse of customer deposits.

    Inventory Lots

    Critics of Tesla on social media have identified countless parking lots where thousands of Tesla vehicles in aggregate are being stored. Tesla has been completely opaque with regard to the existence of these lots and the risks they involve. Many are outdoors, where unsold cars are likely to both discharge their batteries and depreciate in value faster due to exposure to the elements. Inventory lots also represent an additional expense for the company that investors should be aware of.

    The SEC thus far has not pressed Tesla to disclose anything publicly about these lots.

    Model 3 and Model Y Reservation Numbers

    For a time, Mr. Musk was pleased to boast about the number of reservations for the Model 3. By April 24, 2019, on the Q1 2019 Tesla earnings call, his attitude had completely shifted and he stopped disclosing anything about reservations, claiming that they no longer mattered. In Mr. Musk’s words,

    “I think we don’t want to comment on the granularity of deposits. Again, people read too much into this. We’re not playing of the Model Y because we’re just not in production so you can’t really read anything into Model Y orders at this point.”

    This spontaneous lack of disclosure is unacceptable in light of the fact that Tesla previously led investors to believe that deposit/reservation information was material.

    It is unclear why the SEC has not launched an inquiry into Tesla’s shifting metrics.

    “Twitter Sitter” Identity

    When crafting its settlement agreement with Mr. Musk in the two aforementioned civil actions, the SEC appears to have gone to great lengths to center its corrective action around the idea of pre-approval. Specifically, Mr. Musk was supposed to pre-approve any public communications on Twitter that could potentially contain material information. What the SEC did not specify, and which later led to considerable problems (including but not limited to a motion to hold Mr. Musk in contempt of court as he was not abiding by the settlement’s terms at all), was who exactly was supposed to pre-approve Mr. Musk’s communications. Mr. Musk interpreted his settlement agreement to mean that he could “pre-approve” his own messages so long as they were within Tesla corporate policy, while the SEC expected a “experienced securities attorney” to fill that role.

    The SEC never specified exactly who the so-called “Twitter Sitter” would be. Even in court filings concerning this issue, the specific identity of the “experienced securities attorney” was never disclosed.

    If the SEC’s true goal is to hold Mr. Musk accountable, it is clearly necessary to specify who exactly is part of that chain of accountability. As the SEC’s agreement with Mr. Musk currently stands, only an anonymous lawyer can be held accountable. From the public’s perspective, there is no guarantee that such a lawyer even exists, or that if he or she does, that person could be brought before a judge to explain the actions on any given day.

    The Office of the Inspector General should demand an explanation from the SEC as to why the identity of this individual, key to proper civil law enforcement, remains a mystery.

    Fire Risk

    Worldwide, a number of Tesla vehicles have spontaneously caught fire, including numerous cases in the United States. In the United Kingdom, an entire Tesla dealership ignited. This is both a clear safety hazard and a risk to investors that demands immediate investigation by numerous agencies.

    Whistleblower Retaliation

    While the SEC is a civil enforcement agency and does not have the authority to prosecute criminal violations, some of the issues that Tesla whistleblowers have raised would have had a material impact on Tesla shares had their disclosures been properly made by the company. The fact that Tesla has a documented history of retaliating against whistleblowers is therefore significant from a securities law perspective, as well as a criminal law enforcement perspective.

    Tesla Invents a False Threat of Gun Violence in Possible Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513

    In a detailed March 13, 2019 Bloomberg article entitled, “When Elon Musk Tried to Destroy a Tesla Whistleblower, ” the article’s authors describe how Tesla falsified a threat of gun violence by former employee Martin Tripp in order to discredit him. This occurred after Mr. Tripp attempted to blow the whistle on potentially unsafe practices at Tesla. Tesla also sued Mr. Tripp; the case is ongoing.

    Tesla Allegedly Calls Child Protective Services on a Recently Fired Nurse

    Reveal source Anna Watson was previously employed by Provider Healthcare, LLC as a contractor for Access Omnicare, which in turn was and is a contractor for Tesla. Ms. Watson worked as a Physician’s Assistant at the Tesla Fremont factory, until she was terminated in retaliation for disagreeing with the treatment plan for a patient who reported to the Tesla Medical Center, which she felt was inappropriate. Not long after she was fired, Child Protective Services responded to an anonymous complaint falsely alleging that she was a drug addict who was endangering her children.

    Elon Musk Threatens a Recently Fired Employee in the Tesla Parking Lot

    On April 5, 2019, Bloomberg reported that Mr. Musk had allegedly pushed an employee in the Tesla parking lot, causing the Tesla Board of Directors to open an “investigation.” The Board found no evidence of wrongdoing. The allegations were nonetheless supported by several eye witnesses.

    Tesla Obtains a Temporary Restraining Against on a Citizen Journalist

    On April 19, 2019, Tesla obtained a temporary restraining order against Randeep Hothi, one of its critics, who used Twitter to share his concerns about the company’s false and misleading statements. Mr. Hothi had used his observations of Tesla’s factory conditions and vehicles to make relatively accurate predictions about the company’s future plans on a number of occasions. Tesla painted Mr. Hothi, a Ph.D. student, as someone who had attempted to physically harm its employees, without providing any direct evidence. The case is ongoing, though Mr. Hothi has denied Tesla’s allegations and there are no known police reports that would support them.

    Conclusion

    The formal title of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is, “An act [t]o provide for the regulation of securities exchanges and of over-the-counter markets operating in interstate and foreign commerce and through the mails, to prevent inequitable and unfair practices on such exchanges and markets, and for other purposes.”

    As this letter demonstrates, the SEC is failing to live up to its congressional mandate. That any citizen could craft a letter of this length listing concern after documented concern about any single publicly traded company, no matter the industry, name, nature of its chief executive, or market capitalization, suggests a complete regulatory failure. And the concerns listed here are merely a sample.

    Tesla and Mr. Musk have literally and figuratively made a mockery of the the SEC, before and after it took both parties to court., Especially given that the SEC San Francisco Office Regional Director position has been vacant for months, the need for a formal investigation of the SEC’s handling of Tesla is both obvious and urgent. While the SEC may have already internally investigated some of the the issues raised by this letter, the lack of any follow-up action is disturbing and has already had detrimental effects on capital markets.

    Sincerely,

    [Your Name Here]

    CC: The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Mr. Nicklas Akers, Office of California Attorney General Xavier Becerra
    Mr. Robert Rees, United States Department of Justice
    Mr. Steven Buchholz, Securities and Exchange Commission
    Ms. Erin Schneider, Securities and Exchange Commission
    Ms. Cheryl Crumpton, Securities and Exchange Commission
    Mr. Samuel Levine, Office of Federal Trade Commissioner Rohit Chopra
    Ms. Erie Meyer, Office of Federal Trade Commissioner Rohit Chopra
    Mr. Dan Bernal, Office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
    Ms. Rohini Kosoglu, Office of Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA)
    Mr. David Grannis, Office of Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    The initiator of this letter is a guy called Aaron Greenspan who claims to have founded Facebook :rolleyes:

    Like the other Tesla troll skabooshka, Aaron also had a restraining order served against him !!

    5 Votes
  • Total loser

    https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/copyright-claims-dismissed-against-faceb-44525/

    [author: David Kluft]

    Software entrepreneur Aaron Greenspan claims not only to have been the original inventor of Facebook. He also claims to have been the original author of the story of Facebook, via his memoire, Authoritas: One Student’s Harvard Admissions and the Founding of the Facebook Era.

    However, yesterday Massachusetts Federal Magistrate Judge Robert Collings found that these claims were not sufficient to sustain a copyright lawsuit against Benjamin Mezrich, the author of The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, and the makers of the film, The Social Network, which was based on Mezrich’s book.

    According to Greenspan, the story began when he was an undergraduate at Harvard and created a website called “The Facebook.” One of his classmates, Mark Zuckerberg, sought Greenspan’s advice and copied his ideas, which led to the founding of the phenomenally popular social networking site. Greenspan charges that, as early as 2005, Zuckerberg was already constructing a false narrative about the founding of Facebook. A narrative that excluded Greenspan.

    In order to correct what he saw as an injustice, Greenspan did two things. First, he raised legal claims against Zuckerberg, which resulted in a confidential settlement in May 2009. Second, he wrote and published Autoritas, his own account of what actually happened.

    In 2008, Mezrich asked Greenspan for his cooperation in writing a fictional account of the founding of Facebook. When Greenspan refused, Mezrich went ahead with his own book anyway, citing Autoritas as a secondary source. After Mezrich’s book and The Social Network became commercial successes, Greenspan brought copyright infringement claims against Mezrich, his publisher and the filmmakers.

    Greenspan’s principal allegation was that Mezrich had copied Greenspan’s account of his own meeting with Harvard President Larry Summers in order to create a fictional account of a different meeting with President Summers (one that didn’t include Greenspan). Greenspan’s complaint contained about twenty statements about this meeting which he alleged were copied by Mezrich, ranging from a description of the office to his characterization of President Summers as “chubby."

    In order to prove copying in a copyright case, a plaintiff (in lieu of evidence of actual copying) must show that the defendant had access to the work, and that the works are substantially similar. But unfortunately for Greenspan, the Judge found that the two works just weren’t that similar. Judge Collings first put aside many of the plaintiff’s alleged instances of copied expression, holding that much of it was not protectable original expression in the first place. For example, the statement, “the president will see you now” is simply a cliché to denote the start of a meeting; and fragmentary words and phrases, such as the word “chubby” to describe President Summers, or “African-American” to describe his assistant’s ethnicity, are not subject to copyright protection as original expression.

    Once this unoriginal expression was removed from the equation, Judge Collings compared the protectable expression that was left (such as the description of President Summer’s unwelcoming manner) as a whole against the defendant’s work, and determined that any copying that may have occurred was not so extensive that an ordinary observer would find that the two works were substantially similar.

    In addition to recommending the dismissal of Greenspan’s copyright claims, Judge Collings also recommended dismissal of his remaining claims, which included defamation and false advertising.

    Send Print Report
    RELATED POSTS
    Implied Threat on Facebook Insufficient to Support Stalking Conviction“Facebook Said I Could” Defense Fails to Justify Digital Millennium “Trademark” Notice
    LATEST POSTS
    Supreme Court to Decide Whether Trademark Owner Must Prove Willful Infringement to Obtain an Infringer's ProfitsSon of Tam: Supreme Court Strikes Down Lanham Act Section 2(a) For "Immoral" and "Scandalous" MarksEU Parliament Approves New Copyright Rules for the Internet
    See more »

    9 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron Greenspan is unfit Oct 13, 2019

    NonProfit PlainSite Attacks People Online
    Random Tesla Fan
    Random Tesla Fan
    Follow
    Oct 12 · 5 min read
    There is a guy by the name of Aaron Greenspan who hates Tesla very much. His hatred has made his heart angry and bitter and has turned him into a creepy stalker who uses his 501(c)3 Nonprofit organization to attack Tesla owners and supporters online. Before we dive into his list of victims with screenshots of his attacks, let’s take a look at his charity and the people who support it.
    PlainSite.
    PlainSite is a joint venture with Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation (same thing) which is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization in the United States. According to GuideStar, it’s mission is to use technology to assist people with disabilities.
    EIN: 34–1937820
    Address: 20560 SHELBURNE RD SHAKER HTS, OH 44122
    Principal Officer: Aaron Greenspan
    Who Supports This?
    Russel Mitchell of the LA Times is a contributor even though he has been told by multiple sources that PlainSite attacks and bullies people online. It seems that the LA Times is fine with their reporters contributing to online bullying.

    7 Votes
  • @Aaron Greenspan is unfit Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Organizations who have filed a 990-N (e-Postcard) annual electronic notice. Most small organizations that receive less than $50, 000 fall into this category.
    Tax Year 2018 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2018 (01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    956 Carolina Street
    San Francisco, CA 94107
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    www.thinkcomputer.or g
    Tax Year 2017 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2017 (01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    500 Race Street Suite 4321
    San Jose, CA 95126
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    www.thinkcomputer.or g
    Tax Year 2016 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2016 (01/01/2016 - 12/31/2016)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    500 Race Street Apartment 4321
    San Jose, CA 95126
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    www.thinkcomputer.or g
    Tax Year 2015 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2015 (01/01/2015 - 12/31/2015)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 SHELBURNE RD
    SHAKER HTS, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    AARON GREENSPAND

    20560 SHELBURNE RD
    SHAKER HTS, OH 44122
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    WWW.MURFREESBORONCCH AMBEROFCOMMERCE.ORG
    Tax Year 2014 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2014 (01/01/2014 - 12/31/2014)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    1132 Boranda Avenue
    Mountain View, CA 94040
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Tax Year 2013 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2013 (01/01/2013 - 12/31/2013)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 441221941
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    1132 Boranda Avenue
    Mountain View, CA 940403145
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Tax Year 2012 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2012 (01/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    884 College Avenue
    Palo Alto, CA 94306
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Tax Year 2011 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2011 (01/01/2011 - 12/31/2011)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    884 College Avenue
    Palo Alto, CA 94306
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Tax Year 2010 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2010 (01/01/2010 - 12/31/2010)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    884 College Avenue
    Palo Alto, CA 94306
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $50, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Tax Year 2007 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
    Tax Period:
    2007 (01/01/2007 - 12/31/2007)

    EIN:
    34-1937820

    Legal Name (Doing Business as):
    Think Computer Foundation

    Mailing Address:
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 441221941
    United States

    Principal Officer's Name and Address:
    Aaron Greenspan

    884 College Avenue
    Palo Alto, CA 943061303
    United States

    Gross receipts not greater than:
    $25, 000

    Organization has terminated:
    No

    Website URL:
    http://www.thinkcomp uter.org
    Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 6-Sept-2019
    Share
    Print

    IRS Eagle
    Our Agency
    About IRS
    Work at IRS
    Help
    Contact Your Local Office
    Tax Stats, Facts & Figures
    Know Your Rights
    Taxpayer Bill of Rights
    Taxpayer Advocate Service
    Accessibility
    Civil Rights
    Freedom of Information Act
    No Fear Act
    Privacy Policy
    Resolve an Issue
    Respond to a Notice
    Office of Appeals
    Identity Theft Protection
    Report Phishing
    Tax Fraud & Abuse
    Other Languages
    Español
    中文
    한국어
    Pусский
    Tiếng Việt
    Related Sites
    U.S. Treasury
    Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
    USA.gov

    3 Votes

We are here to help

  • 16 years' experience in successful complaint resolution
  • Each complaint is handled individually by highly qualified experts
  • Honest and unbiased reviews
  • Last but not least, all our services are absolutely free

hacking in to state and federal databases to download sealed and sensitive information

Neil S Greenspan VP and Treasurer for plainiste.org under fraudulent 501c non-profit called Think Computer

Aaron Greenspan aka Aaron Jacob Greenspan creator and owner of leagle.com and plainsite.org Aaron Greenspan's father Neil Sanford Greenspan from Shaker Heights, Ohio is the VP and Treasurer for this parasitical monetized website called plainsite.org and leagle.com.Both of these monetized websites are under fraudulent 501c's.
We know this because we have contacted the IRS' 501c office and have made inquiries. We are several people who have filed formal IRS 13909 complaints against Aaron Greenspan and his crazy father Neil Sanford Greenspan and his crazy mother Judith Keene Greenspan. She is a complete nut job! As well as this entire family/ They all have Psychiatric issues and should not even be allowed to roam the streets without being monitored and definitely not be allowed to go near a computer or upload people's personal and private legal cases from Pacer and other State Agencies.
We will not stop exposing this Sociopath Aaron Jacob Greenspan until he backs off and stops terrorizing people online with his monetized websites leagle.com and plainsite.org. Aaron Jacob Greenspan is roaming free because of our freedoms and great laws. In any other country Aaron Jacob Greenspan would be locked up in a Psychiatric Institution, placed on Haldol and never be allowed to go near a computer, smart phone or anybody's personal business. Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a serious danger to society.
If Aaron Jacob Greenspan keeps terrorizing, harassing, stalking and threatening us then we will continue to expose this slimy, sneaky little coward who is genetically demented. Currently Aaron Jacob Greenspan is making attempts to push down the truthful URL's about what a Psychopath he is and how he is intentionally destroying people's careers and reputations with no remorse and refuses to remove harmful URL's. Aaron Jacob Greenspan aka "Sociopath" is using his two monetized websites that he owns and runs called leagle.com and plainsite.org to now make attempts to push down URL's he does not like but are completely true. So, we will step it up now and come out with new information, a new website that is only dedicated to this Sociopath Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his Sociopath father Neil Sanford Greenspan.
This way Aaron Greenspan will not be able to threaten us to remove anything like he has been doing to other third party website and some have been falling for his hot air threats.
This guy is nothing but a joke and a loser.Now because Aaron Greenspan has broadened his online terrorizing, harassment and stalking we will now go full out and expose this Sociopath for what he really is a completely sick in the head Psycho.

  • Sh
    Shut down plainsite.org Feb 02, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is a complete Sociopath who should be legally barred from even touching a computer, smart device and or going near anyone's personal information. This individual is a complete Psycho! His father Neil S Greenspan is also the VP and Treasurer of plainsite.org and works at Case Western Reserve University. Can you believe it! This University should fire this [censor] for ruining people's careers and reputations in an intentional manner and committing tax fraud.

    120 Votes
  • Th
    ThinkComputerCorporation Aug 10, 2018

    @Shut down plainsite.org Aaron Greenspan is a Sociopath.

    74 Votes
  • @Shut down plainsite.org Neil should stop this harassment and shut the website down or at least remove names when someone requests it. Think Computer Foundation is just a scam to avoid paying the Irs. The fake 501C does not help educate children at all. Greenspan klan are all crazy.

    Neil S Greenspan
    Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
    Corresponding author. Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-7288, USA. Telephone: (216) 368-1280. Fax: (216) 368-1357. E-mail: [email protected] (216) 368-1280

    Autism, evolution, and the inadequacy of ‘spectrum’
    Neil S Greenspan
    Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, Volume 2018, Issue 1, 1 January 2018, Pages 213–216, https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoy025
    Published: 24 September 2018 Article history

    60 Votes
  • Fr
    Fraud scam chairty Feb 15, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Shut down plainsite.org 956 Carolina Street San Francisco CA 94107 address for home base locaation.

    55 Votes
  • El
    Elon Musk Apr 14, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Shut down plainsite.org He went to the press again with a fraud story.

    DavidIcke.com
    Toggle navigation
    From our advertisers

    Facebook 'founder' claims social media site has caused 'countless deaths' by failing to protect users
    ANDREW CHEETHAM 29 August 2018

    'The founder of the original 'Facebook' has claimed that the social media platform has caused “countless deaths” by failing to protect users.

    Aaron Greenspan, who won a confidential pay-out from Facebook after claiming he came up with the concept for the social network first, has reopened his feud with Mark Zuckerberg by claiming the social media boss sacrificed safeguards on cyberbullying, extremists and data security to pursue growth at all costs.

    In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Mr Greenspan said Mr Zuckerberg had ignored his warnings and instead designed the platform to be as addictive as tobacco in order to recruit and keep users.
    David Icke's Sensational New Book

    “Facebook’s addictive qualities may not kill anyone directly as cigarettes do every day but it is now established that the site has led to countless deaths, ” claimed Mr Greenspan, who created the 'Universal Face Book' at Harvard four months before Mr Zuckerberg registered Facebook.com and launched it incorporating features from Mr Greenspan's site.

    Mr Greenspan cited the recent leaked memo written by Facebook vice president Andrew Bosworth, in which he said the site's pursuit to "connect people" might "cost someone a life by exposing someone to bullies" or deaths in a "terrorist attack co-ordinated on our tools."'

    Read more: Facebook 'founder' claims social media site has caused 'countless deaths' by failing to protect users
    David Icke's Tour Dates
    Did you like this article?

    RELATED ARTICLES
    google facebook
    22 hours ago
    OUTSPOKEN ECUADORIAN EX-PRESIDENT RAFAEL CORREA’S FACEBOOK PAGE BLOCKED
    facebook surveillance
    11 April 2019
    FACEBOOK’S ‘WAR ON INDIA’: ANALYST SUES TECH GIANT FOR ‘SUBVERTING’ POLLS WITH SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP
    FAKEBOOK
    11 April 2019
    FACEBOOK REVEALS SWEEPING NEW 'REMOVE, REDUCE, INFORM' PLAN TO TACKLE MISINFORMATION AND...
    facebook
    11 April 2019
    CREEPY PATENT FILING SUGGESTS FACEBOOK WANTS TO USE YOUR PHOTOS TO HELP ADVERTISERS TARGET YOUR...
    pentagon big tech
    9 April 2019
    AMERICAN INTERNET COMPANIES ARE PRIVATIZED INSTRUMENTS OF AMERICAN GEOPOLITICAL POWER, AND THEY’RE...
    disabled-woman-naked
    9 April 2019
    FACEBOOK UNDER FIRE AFTER BLOCKING GROUP OVER NAKED DISABLED WOMAN IMAGE

    Terms and Conditions
    Advertise with us
    Write for us
    Contact us

    42 Votes
  • El
    Elon Musk Apr 14, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Elon Musk https://www.davidicke.com/article/491894/facebook-founder-claims-social-media-site-caused-countless-deaths-failing-protect-users

    42 Votes
  • Ho
    How do I remove my information May 11, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Shut down plainsite.org Help! How to remove old judgment from Google and PlainSite. Aaron Greenspan is a sociopath and is stalking me.
    An old judgment from 2008 is appearing at the top of page 1 of Google search results for my name. The California judgment is posted on plainsite.org as the top Google search result. However, the judgment was never renewed and is now expired and unenforceable, being older than 10 years, per CA law: http://www.courts.ca.gov/8207.htm

    I do not have to pay his extortion demands.

    Background: The judgment came at the darkest time of my life. I was gravely depressed and grieving multiple deaths of friends and family. Self-employed at that time but my clients were hurting from the 2007 recession and my work assignments dwindled. I was so depressed I became unable to function at the little work I could get. Maxed out my credit card with cash advances, then unable to make payments. Went on disability, and am now on retirement Social Security, which is my sole source of income. Age 67, no employment, no assets, no close kin, below poverty level, on food stamps and other public assistance programs.

    I never responded to any collection efforts, nor to service of papers. I was paralyzed by fear and didn't know what to do or say, so I did nothing at all.

    Auto-reply received by email www.plainsite.org
    Hello,

    Thanks for getting in touch with us. This message certifies that we have received your request, which has been assigned the tracking code [XXXXXXXX].

    We receive 5-10 requests per day, and have an extremely small staff. Therefore, it may take us anywhere from 1-60 days to respond to your request depending on volume, though we sometimes are able to reply sooner. Most requests are reviewed and addressed within 30 days.

    If your request involves a life-threatening situation, please reply to this message and let us know. Otherwise, we will do our best to address your request in the order it was received.

    Generally, please do not call us, send us multiple requests, mail us letters, or appear in person to our office. Such actions will not accelerate the review process, and may actually slow it down.

    Best regards,

    The PlainSite Team

    This week my search through online court records shows the original Oct 2008 filing, but there is nothing whatsoever of any renewal filing.

    I am trying to move from my current gov-subsided housing to something a bit better. However, if any prospective landlord googles my name, I won't stand a chance.

    Plainsite doesn't care whether a case is expired or not. As long as it's part of the public record, it's on their site and on Google search results for my name. That result doesn't appear on my name searches via Bing or Yahoo; I haven't tried any other search engines than those three.

    As I mentioned above, I obtained the info on my case by searching the online records, which are given on the website for the superior court of my county.

    I searched for my name... there is only the one case. I searched again for the case no. and got the same result. The judgment was filed in Oct 2008. The last action was in Nov 2008 when the creditor obtained an abstract of the judgment. (These are the same details as posted on plainsite.) The online case record shows no further action, therefore the judgment is expired as of Oct 2018, by Calif. law.

    Plainsite.org Think Computer Foundation doesn't care whether a case is expired or not. As long as it's part of the public record, it's on their site and on Google search results for my name. That result doesn't appear on my name searches via Bing or Yahoo; I haven't tried any other search engines than those three.

    26 Votes
  • Gr
    Grossman kid May 16, 2019

    @Shut down plainsite.org YEP ON CAMPUS AT HARVARD THEY CALLED HIM "GROSSMAN kid"

    aaron greenspan used the information to EXTORT financal money out of facebook and ZUCK PAID the EXTORTION money.

    david then went to Aaron Greenspan who was running house systems at Harvard and asked him (under an email non disclosure agreement) to run Facebook on his site which he agreed to do.

    aaron greenspan used the (info) to extort financal money out of facebook and zuckerberg paid the extortion money and dave call it extortion

    U see zuckerberg new aaron greenspan new zuck had stolen the idea facebook .

    I sent all the emails copy to aaron greenspan:{ aaron sold him self off like a hooker standing on a street corner }

    https://www.msigeek.com/5982/interview-with-david-kirkpatrick-author-the-facebook-effect

    http://globalslaves.blogspot.com/2015/04/paul-ceglia-has-been-falsely-charged-by.html?m=1

    34 Votes
  • Li
    Liz want name removed Jul 07, 2019

    @[email protected] (216) 368-1280 Fraud Neil Greenspan is a fraud and harrassment.
    Neil Greenspan has a created a stigma. Neil oy cares about making a quick buck.

    https://www.ncsautism.org/blog//five-decades-of-autism-awareness-what-have-we-achievedenu
    National Council on Severe Autism
    Five Decades of Autism Awareness: What Have We Achieved?
    April 29, 2019
    After much work and little progress, are we like Sisyphus, pushing our autism boulder up the hill, then failing to see fruits of our efforts?
    Autism Awareness logos abound, but meaningful solutions remain elusive.
    Autism Awareness logos abound, but meaningful solutions remain elusive.

    By Neil Greenspan, MD, PhD

    In 1970, the Autism Society of America created the first Autism Awareness Month. So, as I write in April 2019, we have had five decades of efforts to increase sensitivity to individuals with this condition — which is actually a constellation of conditions — affecting neural development, communication, social interaction, and behavior. While these annual commemorations may have increased awareness of autism, the extent to which they have enhanced insight into and improved the lives of people with autism is unclear.

    Awareness campaigns may even backfire by creating false impressions. One limitation of disability-specific campaigns such as Autism Awareness Month is that they typically promote experiences of individuals with diseases or disabilities that conform to a preferred pattern. For the individual at the center of attention for one of these human-interest stories, obstacles are faced, struggles ensue, and there is an emotionally satisfying success in the end. Iterations of this narrative arc in relation to autism have undoubtedly engaged some non-disabled people who might otherwise not have paid attention, but they have also tended to obscure many dire realities as well.

    Too many media outlets prefer to present only the stories, even if unrepresentative, that have a relatively happy ending and will be perceived as uplifting by the audience. Meanwhile, the bottom line for our population is the inadequacy and sometimes even cruelty of systems and services nominally in place to assist those with autism, especially adults. True autism awareness requires clarity about areas where progress is desperately needed. Here are some of them.

    Mental and Behavioral Health Care: The first arena of tremendous need is basic behavioral and mental health treatment. In my experience, most physicians specializing in the treatment of autism focus on children and possibly adolescents and do not treat adults. Meanwhile, psychiatrists and perhaps some neurologists who do treat adults with autism tend to focus too narrowly on prescribing medications. Furthermore, there are currently zero drugs that are FDA-approved specifically for the core clinical manifestations of autism. The FDA has approved two drugs for aggression in the context of autism (the antipsychotics risperidone [Risperdal] and aripiprazole [Abilify]). However, they do not necessarily address the defining symptoms associated with autism, or, in some cases, even the symptoms they are supposed to treat.

    The drugs that are employed typically require a laborious and largely empirical process (i.e. trial and error, with emphasis on the error) that can be excruciatingly difficult for the patient and the family as increasing doses are tried until a positive effect can be discerned, preferably in the absence of intolerable side effects. Knowing what effects, either good or bad, are attributable to the new medication is often uncertain and can create additional burdensome appointments with yet more doctors, not to mention stress. Even so, many of these drugs are only modestly effective or are ineffective while the side effects may be barely tolerated or intolerable. Some of these side effects, such as weight gain, dizziness, or heat insensitivity can be quite serious in the full context of family life even if the prescribing physician regards them as minor. Consequently, the current standard of care for adults with autism is embarrassingly inadequate for many patients.

    So have decades of awareness resulted in significantly improved interventions for adults with autism? It seems the answer is no in spite of the sometimes extensive efforts of parents, or other caregivers, to find the necessary care.

    General Medical Care: A second problem is medical services for the endless variety of other ailments experienced by many adults with autism. Some adults with autism, even if highly verbal, may not be able to describe their symptoms in as detailed a manner as their doctors would prefer, resulting in a lower quality of care than might otherwise be the case. In the current time-pressured medical environment, the tendency for some physicians to become impatient with those affected by autism, who may require more time and effort than other patients, can also undermine the quality of care. The establishment of a specialized general medical service for adult patients with autism at the Wexner Medical Center affiliated with Ohio State University is a bright spot but also reflects my strong impression that few family physicians or internists elsewhere are effective in interacting with and treating members of this population.

    A further complication is that individuals with autism often suffer from multiple other complaints affecting the central nervous system or other bodily systems. These other conditions can include, but are not limited to, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, gastrointestinal problems, and difficulty sleeping. Treatment for these other conditions or symptoms will frequently require appointments with other specialists. A lack of coordinated care, which is more often than not the case, adds to the burden of parents or other caregivers.

    Another obstacle to appropriate medical care is that when autistic adults live apart from family members, home care providers may be reluctant to take clients to doctor visits for a variety of reasons: a tendency to dismiss the concerns of people with disabilities, a preference for minimizing effort, constraints imposed by having to deal with the needs of multiple clients in group homes, and minimal medical knowledge. A related factor contributing to less than optimal well-being in such residential settings is that the diets of individuals with disabilities may contain too many calories and too few nutrients. Of comparable importance, their levels of physical activity may be less than is necessary for optimal or even decent health.

    With some exceptions, it is hard to see how decades of autism awareness have resulted in improved access to general medical care for adults with autism even when caregivers devote hours to finding the most appropriate physicians.

    Community Services: Adults with autism typically lack the cognitive and adaptive skills to function independently, and require disability programs to provide care, paid or volunteer work, social and recreational opportunities, and community engagement. However, the supply of these programs is not keeping pace with increasing demand. Providers are not paid adequately and many are shutting their doors, while waitlists for these Medicaid-funded programs grow longer in many states. The autism housing crisis is acute across the country, and will only be exacerbated as the parents grow older and too infirm to care for their disabled grown children.

    In many cases, the extent of individual attention required necessitates monthly expenses that are astonishingly high and therefore completely out of reach for the vast majority of families. For example, earlier this year we spoke to an individual with multiple relevant credentials who provides customized in-home services — and charges $250 per hour for her services. More recently, we contacted a residential therapeutic facility in another state to assess its suitability for a family member and learned that the services offered are about $25, 000 per month.

    Furthermore, in spite of stereotypes, many individuals with autism want friends and seek social acceptance and engagement. However, limitations in social skills may cause them to be anxious in social settings and may create situations that make nondisabled people less likely to become friends. One result is that many adults with autism are extremely lonely. I see an epidemic of isolation among young autistic adults, who need to find their micro-communities within their own communities. But such services are in short supply.

    Again, it is difficult to see how decades of autism awareness has produced an adequate community care system for adults disabled by autism. No matter how hard parents search for an appropriate residential arrangement for an affected family member, they cannot find it if it does not exist.

    Employment: For those with sufficient cognitive skills, finding and maintaining employment is challenging. They can run afoul of fellow employees and supervisors because they react too strongly to impolite comments or critical feedback from other employees or from customers or clients. Affected individuals may also fail to abide by what are viewed (at a given workplace) as customary patterns of behavior. One consequence is that adults with autism, even those who are deemed “high functioning” continue to have relatively low employment rates.

    Summing up, in spite of decades of awareness campaigns, necessary services are profoundly inadequate, and I do not see on the horizon solutions in many of areas, be it mental health, general medical care, community services and housing, or employment. Sure, iPads, behavioral therapies, and palliatives described in some books — such as Disney movies, Siri, medical cannabis and road trips — may be helpful at times, but current, stable and long-term options are unsatisfactory for the overwhelming majority of people. Consequently, the efforts of parents, other family members, or unrelated caregivers supporting adults with autism are analogous to Sisyphus* of the ancient Greek myth – metaphorically rolling a boulder up a hill only to have it roll down again endlessly. Awareness is clearly not enough. We need well-conceived action now.

    Neil Greenspan, MD, PhD is an immunologist and clinical pathologist in the Department of Pathology at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. The opinions expressed are solely his own and should not be interpreted as representing the official views of the institutions with which he is affiliated.

    * In Greek mythology, Sisyphus, because of various tricks he had played on lesser gods, was punished for eternity by Zeus to roll a boulder up a hill only to have it roll back down, in an endless cycle.

    Disclaimer.png

    ← Including Severe Autism in Neuroscience ResearchWe Need a Full Continuum of Care for Adults with Severe Autism →
    Comments (2) Newest First Subscribe via e-mail
    Preview POST COMMENT…

    Debra Rich
    4 weeks ago · 0 Likes

    I agree with what Karen Delaney said and have experienced first hand the lack of training in medical staff. My son needed an EEG to rule out seizures. For many months he's exhibited bizarre and concerning behaviors that have elements of movement disorder, elements of seizure activity but strongly tied with anxiety. His teachers were puzzled and concerned as were we, they had gone on for many months since getting him off Risperdal, and we wanted answers. We live in CT and only minutes away from Yale Children's Hospital. The chief of pediatric neurology was the attending physician. There was even this wonderful autism nurse who visited our room with a whole sensory kit with anything my son could need or want. I thought we were in great hands. My son was anesthetized so they could hook up the EEG leads. I was ordered out of the OR. A short time later I was called down saying he was awake. When I got there, he had managed to rip off all the EEG leads and his IV. The OR nurses who were with him said they could not stop him. I personally think they left him alone to attend other patients but I can't prove that. I was treated very rudely for even asking if we could try again. We were sent back to the recovery room where we started. My son proceeded to get very sick from the anesthesia as it wore off. He hadn't eaten anything since dinner the previous day and it was now 3 pm. There were no apologies, no sympathy from the OR staff. Finally the chief of neurology came to see us. Again, no apologies or sympathy. He treated me with condescension, said basically if he were having a seizure I'd know it. YES! I know what a grand mal seizure looks like, my son used to have them!!! Then he said, "Well, I can put him on an anti-convulsant, see what happens." I was very disappointed. I wanted ANSWERS!!! Not more drugs!!! One of the best pediatric hospitals in the country and they had very little to offer. The autism nurse with the sensory kit is a great first step towards making Yale more autism-friendly, but the same level of compassion and training is needed in the OR. In hindsight I should have insisted on staying by his side the entire time, in future I will!! But staff should be prepared for patients who try to pull off EEG leads, rip out IV's, rip open their surgery stitches, etc. They should be trained on how to re-direct this behavior, or insist that parents of autistic non-verbal kids stay with them the whole time to help the OR staff care for their children. This was a tremendous waste of valuable time, money, and resources and worst of all, my son was cruelly traumatized for nothing and we still don't know if there is seizure activity we need to be concerned about.

    Karen Delaney
    2 months ago · 1 Like

    This is hitting home right now and I think the author glazed over one point. Let me back up and give you today's story. Got a call from my son's full time mentor - my son had a meltdown while walking to the car and put his head through the read window of an SUV. Blood everywhere and ambulance called. They were 40 minutes away but the ambulance brought him to my local hospital. I got there easily 25 minutes before them and tried to get them to generate the registration so he wouldn't have to wait or listen to people chatter - no go - that's not how we do it. I tried to speak to a nurse to prep them for what may or may not happen - he's nearly 22 - 285 pounds and 6 foot. "I'll see if they have time" ...they did not. I said he will need to be sedated - he can't just wait here...he will need something. I brought his meds from home - can I give him some? "No, we have a much better pharmacy than you do"... After waiting nearly 2 hours with less than 10 minutes of human interaction my son flew off the stretcher and started to hit me across the head and face...I managed to hit the nurse call button and they ran in and tackled my son - face down (with a bleeding forehead and nose and bruising eyes) and pinned him down... this has killed people because of the inability to breath... then the charge nurse snarled at me that his staff wouldn't have been put at risk for injury if I hadn't questioned his med suggestion that the doctor randomly brought up with no real conviction or information. So now I'm looking at my son - covered in blood with 5 people laying on top of him giving him a shot in the hip and gettting snarled at for questioning something... The shot worked - 6 hours later we were walking out of the ER with my son stitched up... the doctor never came back before she left her shift to check on us. The charge nurse never came back to check on things. One technician showed some compassion - ONE... I asked for paper and a pen to write my son a schedule while he was escalating and they gave him a crayon!!! So an employee's car is broken and we will be paying for that, my son had an ambulance ride, a horrific ER visit and has 5 stitches and multiple new scars. I have such frustration and anger right now. Here's the real kicker to the whole story... I was a supervisory RN at this hospital for 25 years until I retired 16 years ago because of my son's needs. I am not clueless... I know how this should have gone down. I know and I asked... and they were not about to give or bend. There will be some letters and phone calls tomorrow and there had better be some training for some piss poor ER staff that I met today.

    So the point that I think the author may have touched on but not enough is the lack of training in the medical staff generally. Docs unfortunately now have a "hands off" approach and only get dirty when they have to - and it seems the rest of the staff is adopting the same philosophy

    Sign up to receive NCSA news and updates.

    Name *
    First Name
    Last Name
    Email Address *
    Search our site
    Search
    © 2019 National Council on Severe Autism
    [email protected]
    Your donations help support our mission.
    NCSA’s PayPal Giving Fund
    (no fees deducted)
    Or
    Donate with PayPal button

    20 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas BTC Apr 07, 2018

    David Russcol member of the Berkman Klein Center - Harvard University
    A sneak and a half!

    15 Votes
  • Gr
    Greenspan Criminal Family May 20, 2018

    Judith Keene Greenspan has a relative who is married to a Judge and that's why her insane son Aaron Jacob Greenspan thinks he can simply do whatever he wants to whoever he wants. We will let the public know the exact name of her relative and the Judge's name to show the public that these criminals all work together to screw people over for money.

    37 Votes
  • St
    Stop this pesky Tick Jun 14, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan a pesky Tick

    Dear Facebook, I’m Never Going Away
    By John Letzing
    Sep 19, 2012 7:50 pm ET
    0 COMMENTS
    Facebook Inc. is famous for its controversial creation story. And while the Winklevoss twins have apparently moved on, one claimant to Facebook fame doesn’t appear to be going away anytime soon.

    Aaron Greenspan, who attended Harvard University with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, has been battling with the company for years over trademark claims and has published a book describing his creation of an unrecognized Facebook forebear called houseSYSTEM. Over time, Mr. Greenspan has been eager to point out Mr. Zuckerberg’s alleged ethical lapses for anyone willing to listen.

    On Wednesday, Mr. Greenspan published a batch of early instant messages between himself and Mr. Zuckerberg allegedly from Facebook’s earliest days. They offer little new information about Facebook’s origins, but provide an interesting window into the mind of a young Mr. Zuckerberg on his way to very big things–though his vision is perhaps not crystal clear.

    In one IM exchange allegedly from Jan. 2005, after Mr. Zuckerberg moved his start-up to Silicon Valley, he’s asked by Mr. Greenspan what he wants what was then known as “Thefacebook” to be. “I kind of want to be the new mtv, ” Mr. Zuckerberg responds. When Mr. Greenspan suggests Thefacebook (It would not become “Facebook” until later in 2005) would be a good match for MTV, Mr. Zuckerberg answers: “Yea but I don’t think they buy stuff… not that i want to sell yet.”

    It was, of course, avoiding early takeover bids from large companies that enabled Facebook to ultimately go public on its own this May –though its share price has tumbled since then, to close at $23.29 on Wednesday.

    A Facebook spokesman declined to comment on the legitimacy of the messages published by Mr. Greenspan.

    In another exchange allegedly from Dec. 2004, Mr. Zuckerberg–who would one day star in the opening of an episode of Saturday Night Live–writes that he’s just returned home from Los Angeles, where he sounds star-struck about having been able to meet the band Green Day backstage after a concert.

    In the same IM exchange, Mr. Zuckerberg also describes his efforts to redesign the home page of his nascent social site: “It’s way too long when you have a message, a poke, a friend request and all that stuff.”

    Mr. Greenspan and Facebook have sparred now for years. In 2008, Mr. Greenspan filed a petition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to cancel Facebook’s “Facebook” trademark, which had been issued in 2006. In 2009, Mr. Greenspan agreed to settle the matter for undisclosed terms–though he wrote Wednesday that he continues to spar with the company over its “bogus trademark rights.”

    In a statement issued when Facebook settled its spat with Greenspan over the “Facebook” trademark in 2009, Mr. Zuckerberg said that, “Aaron and I studied together at Harvard and I’ve always admired his entrepreneurial spirit and love of building things.” He also acknowledged that Mr. Greenspan’s houseSYSTEM included a “Universal Face Book feature.”

    Mr. Greenspan still sounds bitter about the fact while the two men were building similar technologies at the same time, it’s Mr. Zuckerberg who’s won fame and fortune. He notes that for about three years until 2011, the two lived “exactly one block” away from each other in Palo Alto, Calif., formerly home to Facebook’s headquarters.

    “It wouldn’t have been difficult for him to stop by and apologize for any misunderstanding, ” Mr. Greenspan writes of Mr. Zuckerberg. “Not to mention the several times we crossed paths, either when he walked in front of my house, or was walking to his, or sitting down for Mexican food at Palo Alto Sol. I got a grin and a wave, but an apology never came. There was no remorse.”

    38 Votes
  • St
    Stop this pesky Tick Jun 14, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan and his parents Neil S Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan are so angry at the world and that they have to dish out lots of money to take care of their two sons that they set up these entire 501c Tax Frauds so they could live on easy street and created an easy source of cash flow at the expense of thousands of Americans where they intentionally destroy people's careers and reputations with their monetized websites such as leagle.com and plainsite.org.

    These individuals own man other monetized websites and do not like to do real work for a living and definitely do not believe that they should pay any taxes even though their entire 501c is a complete Tax Fraud. Lots of the money they receive is used for their personal pleasures and they do whatever they want with other people's money without any consideration or respect for anyone.It appears these individuals feel as if they are entitled and must feel like they are smarter than the rest of the population.

    Judith Keene Greenspan has a female relative who is married to a Judge and this must give these individuals some extra confidence to just hurt people with their monetized websites where they access people's dirty laundry or legal documents for their enjoyment and profit. Work? That is a foreign word to these social pariahs.

    43 Votes
  • Pu
    Public Domain! Ha! Jun 23, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan, Plain Site, Think Computer Foundation Aaron Greenspan, Plain Site, Think Computer Foundation tax fraud, fraudulent 501(c)(3), con artist, duped investors Shaker Heights Ohio

    *REBUTTAL Individual responds: Reply from Aaron Greenspan

    Print this ReportEmail this Report

    REBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report! | Consumer Comment
    Corporate Advocacy Program
    Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

    Add Rebuttal to this Report File New Report
    ← Is this
    scam report
    About you?
    scam report
    A business' first
    line of defense
    on the Internet.
    If your business is
    willing to make a
    commitment to
    customer satisfaction
    Click here now..
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan aka Aaron Greenspan is the founder of Think Computer Foundation, which manages Plain Site (plainsite.org). Aaaron's website states that he has registered Plain Site, a purported public access function to court websites, as a 501(c)(3) charity in line with IRS regulations.

    The basis for the website came from Aaron's own interest and experience with technology and the law. Aaaron claimed that the purpose of Think Computer Foundation was to help children through technology. Yet, later this became a personal piggy bank for him to fund his numerous lawsuits. In the past, he has claimed he was defamed because he was left out of book and movie deals due to defamation by omission. Each of his lawsuits were dismissed and he was hit with a motion for sanctions at each step.

    The case is:

    Greenspan v. Random House, et al., Case No. 1:11-CV-12000-RBC (District of Massachusetts) (Greenspan's lawsuit is dismissed and appeal is denied and supreme court review was denied)

    Far from helping children, which is nothing more than a cover, Think Computer Foundation and Plain Site have morphed into a personal piggy bank for Aaron Greenspan to fund his own speech. In sum and substance, Think Computer Foundation, Plain Site, and Aaron Greenspan are alter egos of each other. They do not exist separately. They do not have an independent board. They do not have separate auditors, attorneys etc. Instead, Aaaron uses these companies and foundations to raise fraudulent donations from donors, of which I am one, and to efficiently evade taxes.

    Aaron has also active sued the US Court System, on behalf of Think Computer Foundation, attempting to act pro se. However, his suit was struck out because under long standing precedent, a corporation cannot be represented by an unlicensed attorney. Aaron is not a licensed attorney. He is also a college drop out. In sum and substance, he over promises and under delivers and what you are left with is feeling cheated and feeling like you have funded a conspiracy theorist. It is truly unfortunate because here is a guy with so much promise if he could just be honest.

    The case is:

    Aaron Greenspan, Think Computer Foundation v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Case No. 5:2014-CV-2396 JTM

    (Case Dismissed, Appeal Denied)

    The Fraud and IRS Problem with Plain Site and Think Computer Foundation:

    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don't really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    We were under the impression that this was a reputable guy, that he was also independently wealthy and, thus, our donations would go to a good cause: public access to a court system. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell, which one, if any, of Aaron's claims are true. Each time his company has a problem, he attempts to act ike a lawyer or change the rules so that they don't apply to him. Worse, the Plain Site website has become nothing more than a trolling adventure for Aaron. Every time there is a new news story that details someone's misfortune, he uploads their docket on to the website and publicly shames them both online and through his tweets. While public dissemination of information is certainly a goal worthy of support -- and that is why I and others have contributed to his foundation in the past. However, using the foundation, plain site and related twitter accounts as a trolling feature to publicly shame and defame individuals is not what his donors signed up for. It is also completely against the rules of a purported IRS 501(c)(3) foundation. Tax free entities are not meant to be used as personal media outlets for trolling purposes.

    Aaron has committed a fraud by taking money, services and equipment from his donors to perpetuate a continuing personal website masquerading as a charity.

    The Fraud Problem with Aaron Greenspan and Coinbase, Inc.

    Now, what comes next? Aaron applies for a license to issue digital currency in Florida. Website is here:

    archive.org/details/coinbasefloridamtl

    It gets even more interesting:

    Aaron was charged in connection with a criminal complaint for False Claims Violations and Fraud in United States v. Yurygrenadyor, Case No. 09-CV-7891, although the charges were dismissed.

    None of this information has ever been disclosed to his donors and perhaps his investors. He is a conman with a slick sales pitch. He wants to help people help others, especially the needy, through technology. But its all lies. He is an abrasive, ill-tempered man with poor business judgment and completely lacking in ethics.

    When I met Aaron I thought he was out to change the world. He was idenpendently wealthy. He wanted others to help him through his foundation change the world through technology. But he will talk to you until your check clears. The moment it does, all promises are off. What are you are actually funding is Aaron Greenspan and no one else. And his foundation is nothing more than a sham and he is likely to lose his 501(c)(3) certification. I have sent in an email to the IRS through their reporting service. I have filed suit in state court to get return of my money and I am wondering if Aaron has hit other people up for donations to his foundation? Did he disclose how many times he has been sued or sued himself? Did he disclose to you his selection process of what gets included and what does in Plain Site and how he sets up pages to defame people? Is anyone else owed money? Did you guys know that you are funding Aaron Greenspan's endless series of frivolous lawsuits? His defamation campaigns? His advertisements? Please report it here.

    This report was posted on scam report on 12/17/2015 08:35 PM and is a permanent record located here: https:///link removed/ The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. scam report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of scam report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

    20 Votes
  • Pu
    Public Domain! Ha! Jun 23, 2018

    This is reposted from ripoffreport. Do a ripoffreport search for plainsite.org and you will see all the complaints. This guy Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a 33 year old ASSHOLE!! AARON GREENSPAN IS AN INTERNET SCAM ARTIST! Below is a repost: Sick attempt by Aaron Jacob Greenspan, the owner of the website plainsite.org to ...

    The case is:

    Aaron Greenspan, Think Computer Foundation v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Case No. 5:2014-CV-2396 JTM

    (Case Dismissed, Appeal Denied)

    The Fraud and IRS Problem with Plain Site and Think Computer Foundation:

    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don't really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    We were under the impression that this was a reputable guy, that he was also independently wealthy and, thus, our donations would go to a good cause: public access to a court system. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell, which one, if any, of Aaron's claims are true. Each time his company has a problem, he attempts to act ike a lawyer or change the rules so that they don't apply to him. Worse, the Plain Site website has become nothing more than a trolling adventure for Aaron. Every time there is a new news story that details someone's misfortune, he uploads their docket on to the website and publicly shames them both online and through his tweets. While public dissemination of information is certainly a goal worthy of support -- and that is why I and others have contributed to his foundation in the past. However, using the foundation, plain site and related twitter accounts as a trolling feature to publicly shame and defame individuals is not what his donors signed up for. It is also completely against the rules of a purported IRS 501(c)(3) foundation. Tax free entities are not meant to be used as personal media outlets for trolling purposes.

    Aaron has committed a fraud by taking money, services and equipment from his donors to perpetuate a continuing personal website masquerading as a charity.

    18 Votes
  • The case is:

    Greenspan v. Random House, et al., Case No. 1:11-CV-12000-RBC (District of Massachusetts) (Greenspan's lawsuit is dismissed and appeal is denied and supreme court review was denied)

    Far from helping children, which is nothing more than a cover, Think Computer Foundation and Plain Site have morphed into a personal piggy bank for Aaron Greenspan to fund his own speech. In sum and substance, Think Computer Foundation, Plain Site, and Aaron Greenspan are alter egos of each other. They do not exist separately. They do not have an independent board. They do not have separate auditors, attorneys etc. Instead, Aaaron uses these companies and foundations to raise fraudulent donations from donors, of which I am one, and to efficiently evade taxes.

    Aaron has also active sued the US Court System, on behalf of Think Computer Foundation, attempting to act pro se. However, his suit was struck out because under long standing precedent, a corporation cannot be represented by an unlicensed attorney. Aaron is not a licensed attorney. He is also a college drop out. In sum and substance, he over promises and under delivers and what you are left with is feeling cheated and feeling like you have funded a conspiracy theorist. It is truly unfortunate because here is a guy with so much promise if he could just be honest.

    The case is:

    Aaron Greenspan, Think Computer Foundation v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Case No. 5:2014-CV-2396 JTM

    (Case Dismissed, Appeal Denied)

    The Fraud and IRS Problem with Plain Site and Think Computer Foundation:

    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don't really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    We were under the impression that this was a reputable guy, that he was also independently wealthy and, thus, our donations would go to a good cause: public access to a court system. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell, which one, if any, of Aaron's claims are true. Each time his company has a problem, he attempts to act ike a lawyer or change the rules so that they don't apply to him. Worse, the Plain Site website has become nothing more than a trolling adventure for Aaron. Every time there is a new news story that details someone's misfortune, he uploads their docket on to the website and publicly shames them both online and through his tweets. While public dissemination of information is certainly a goal worthy of support -- and that is why I and others have contributed to his foundation in the past. However, using the foundation, plain site and related twitter accounts as a trolling feature to publicly shame and defame individuals is not what his donors signed up for. It is also completely against the rules of a purported IRS 501(c)(3) foundation. Tax free entities are not meant to be used as personal media outlets for trolling purposes.

    Aaron has committed a fraud by taking money, services and equipment from his donors to perpetuate a continuing personal website masquerading as a charity.

    The Fraud Problem with Aaron Greenspan and Coinbase, Inc.

    Now, what comes next? Aaron applies for a license to issue digital currency in Florida. Website is here:

    archive.org/details/coinbasefloridamtl

    It gets even more interesting:

    Aaron was charged in connection with a criminal complaint for False Claims Violations and Fraud in United States v. Yurygrenadyor, Case No. 09-CV-7891, although the charges were dismissed.

    None of this information has ever been disclosed to his donors and perhaps his investors. He is a conman with a slick sales pitch. He wants to help people help others, especially the needy, through technology. But its all lies. He is an abrasive, ill-tempered man with poor business judgment and completely lacking in ethics.

    When I met Aaron I thought he was out to change the world. He was idenpendently wealthy. He wanted others to help him through his foundation change the world through technology. But he will talk to you until your check clears. The moment it does, all promises are off. What are you are actually funding is Aaron Greenspan and no one else. And his foundation is nothing more than a sham and he is likely to lose his 501(c)(3) certification. I have sent in an email to the IRS through their reporting service. I have filed suit in state court to get return of my money and I am wondering if Aaron has hit other people up for donations to his foundation? Did he disclose how many times he has been sued or sued himself? Did he disclose to you his selection process of what gets included and what does in Plain Site and how he sets up pages to defame people? Is anyone else owed money? Did you guys know that you are funding Aaron Greenspan's endless series of frivolous lawsuits? His defamation campaigns? His advertisements?

    24 Votes
  • We have sent in a total of 6 IRS Referral Forms 13909 to the Non-Profit Office in Dallas, Texas in which we have sent them all of Aaron Jacob Greenspan and Dr. Neil S Greenspan's 60 pages of 501c Tax Fraud documents, plus the 6 pages of 501c Tax Fraud documents from the State of Delaware and all the financial evidence needed to put these individuals behind bars for Tax Fraud. It should only be a matter of time before the IRS and FBI come swooping down on these criminals and start freezing all their bank account and assets, both hidden and in plainsite.

    25 Votes
  • The case is:

    Greenspan v. Random House, et al., Case No. 1:11-CV-12000-RBC (District of Massachusetts) (Greenspan's lawsuit is dismissed and appeal is denied and supreme court review was denied)

    Far from helping children, which is nothing more than a cover, Think Computer Foundation and Plain Site have morphed into a personal piggy bank for Aaron Greenspan to fund his own speech. In sum and substance, Think Computer Foundation, Plain Site, and Aaron Greenspan are alter egos of each other. They do not exist separately. They do not have an independent board. They do not have separate auditors, attorneys etc. Instead, Aaaron uses these companies and foundations to raise fraudulent donations from donors, of which I am one, and to efficiently evade taxes.

    Aaron has also active sued the US Court System, on behalf of Think Computer Foundation, attempting to act pro se. However, his suit was struck out because under long standing precedent, a corporation cannot be represented by an unlicensed attorney. Aaron is not a licensed attorney. He is also a college drop out. In sum and substance, he over promises and under delivers and what you are left with is feeling cheated and feeling like you have funded a conspiracy theorist. It is truly unfortunate because here is a guy with so much promise if he could just be honest.

    The case is:

    Aaron Greenspan, Think Computer Foundation v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Case No. 5:2014-CV-2396 JTM

    (Case Dismissed, Appeal Denied)

    The Fraud and IRS Problem with Plain Site and Think Computer Foundation:

    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don't really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    We were under the impression that this was a reputable guy, that he was also independently wealthy and, thus, our donations would go to a good cause: public access to a court system. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell, which one, if any, of Aaron's claims are true. Each time his company has a problem, he attempts to act ike a lawyer or change the rules so that they don't apply to him. Worse, the Plain Site website has become nothing more than a trolling adventure for Aaron. Every time there is a new news story that details someone's misfortune, he uploads their docket on to the website and publicly shames them both online and through his tweets. While public dissemination of information is certainly a goal worthy of support -- and that is why I and others have contributed to his foundation in the past. However, using the foundation, plain site and related twitter accounts as a trolling feature to publicly shame and defame individuals is not what his donors signed up for. It is also completely against the rules of a purported IRS 501(c)(3) foundation. Tax free entities are not meant to be used as personal media outlets for trolling purposes.

    Aaron has committed a fraud by taking money, services and equipment from his donors to perpetuate a continuing personal website masquerading as a charity.

    The Fraud Problem with Aaron Greenspan and Coinbase, Inc.

    Now, what comes next? Aaron applies for a license to issue digital currency in Florida. Website is here:

    archive.org/details/coinbasefloridamtl

    It gets even more interesting:

    Aaron was charged in connection with a criminal complaint for False Claims Violations and Fraud in United States v. Yurygrenadyor, Case No. 09-CV-7891, although the charges were dismissed.

    None of this information has ever been disclosed to his donors and perhaps his investors. He is a conman with a slick sales pitch. He wants to help people help others, especially the needy, through technology. But its all lies. He is an abrasive, ill-tempered man with poor business judgment and completely lacking in ethics.

    25 Votes
  • 50
    501(c)(3) Tax Scams Jul 01, 2018

    Dr Neil S Greenspan is the founder and mastermind of this Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation, as well as the many monetized websites that he has his son Aaron Jacob Greenspan run as the President, while he sits back and is a full participant as the VP and Treasurer.

    Dr. Neil S Greenspan's wife Judith Keene Greenspan also has some sort of 501c scam going on with her Keene Promotions company.

    This entire 501(c)(3) concocted scam was thought out in a lot of detail, in order to create the almost perfect non profit Tax Evasion Fraud and Scam against the US Government.

    There is also the fact that these individuals have been swindling the States of California, Delaware and Ohio as they are hiding their assets and not being transparent with their real and true earnings. These individuals are committing well thought out Tax Frauds, which are Felonies.

    The IRS should seize the assets of these individuals and start investigating all of their money laundering schemes.

    These individuals take the cake when it comes to being a criminal and committing large scale frauds and scams.

    26 Votes
  • Look what I came across. Aaron Greenspan seems to be out of his mind. I came across these blogs where John Fuenchem aka Aaron Greenspan is rambaling like a mental patient. Aaron Greenspan sounds dangerous and I fear for my life and safety. He was invested by attorney general office 7 years ago was able to worm his way out of it. Unlike Aaron Swartz who always had good intentions but committed suicide.

    Aaron Greenspan is crying like a baby because now his name is all over the web.

    http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2017/08/free-law-project-massive-searchable.html

    http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/free_law_project_releases_new_plugin_to_improve_free_pacer_archive/

    https://llb2.com/2017/04/05/free-law-project-plans-to-harvest-all-free-opinions-and-orders-from-pacer/

    https://www.techdirt.com/user/johnf

    26 Votes
  • TAXPAYERS

    Aaron Greenspan, Plain Site, Think Computer Foundation Aaron Greenspan, Plain Site, Think Computer Foundation tax fraud, fraudulent 501(c)(3), con artist, duped investors Shaker Heights Ohio
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan aka Aaron Greenspan is the founder of Think Computer Foundation, which manages Plain Site (plainsite.org). Aaaron’s website states that he has registered Plain Site, a purported public access function to court websites, as a 501(c)(3) charity in line with IRS regulations.

    The basis for the website came from Aaron’s own interest and experience with technology and the law. Aaaron claimed that the purpose of Think Computer Foundation was to help children through technology. Yet, later this became a personal piggy bank for him to fund his numerous lawsuits. In the past, he has claimed he was defamed because he was left out of book and movie deals due to defamation by omission. Each of his lawsuits were dismissed and he was hit with a motion for sanctions at each step.

    The case is:

    Greenspan v. Random House, et al., Case No. 1:11-CV-12000-RBC (District of Massachusetts) (Greenspan’s lawsuit is dismissed and appeal is denied and supreme court review was denied)

    Far from helping children, which is nothing more than a cover, Think Computer Foundation and Plain Site have morphed into a personal piggy bank for Aaron Greenspan to fund his own speech. In sum and substance, Think Computer Foundation, Plain Site, and Aaron Greenspan are alter egos of each other. They do not exist separately. They do not have an independent board. They do not have separate auditors, attorneys etc. Instead, Aaaron uses these companies and foundations to raise fraudulent donations from donors, of which I am one, and to efficiently evade taxes.

    Aaron has also active sued the US Court System, on behalf of Think Computer Foundation, attempting to act pro se. However, his suit was struck out because under long standing precedent, a corporation cannot be represented by an unlicensed attorney. Aaron is not a licensed attorney. He is also a college drop out. In sum and substance, he over promises and under delivers and what you are left with is feeling cheated and feeling like you have funded a conspiracy theorist. It is truly unfortunate because here is a guy with so much promise if he could just be honest.

    The case is:

    Aaron Greenspan, Think Computer Foundation v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Case No. 5:2014-CV-2396 JTM

    (Case Dismissed, Appeal Denied)

    The Fraud and IRS Problem with Plain Site and Think Computer Foundation:

    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don’t really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    We were under the impression that this was a reputable guy, that he was also independently wealthy and, thus, our donations would go to a good cause: public access to a court system. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell, which one, if any, of Aaron’s claims are true. Each time his company has a problem, he attempts to act ike a lawyer or change the rules so that they don’t apply to him. Worse, the Plain Site website has become nothing more than a trolling adventure for Aaron. Every time there is a new news story that details someone’s misfortune, he uploads their docket on to the website and publicly shames them both online and through his tweets. While public dissemination of information is certainly a goal worthy of support — and that is why I and others have contributed to his foundation in the past. However, using the foundation, plain site and related twitter accounts as a trolling feature to publicly shame and defame individuals is not what his donors signed up for. It is also completely against the rules of a purported IRS 501(c)(3) foundation. Tax free entities are not meant to be used as personal media outlets for trolling purposes.

    Aaron has committed a fraud by taking money, services and equipment from his donors to perpetuate a continuing personal website masquerading as a charity.

    The Fraud Problem with Aaron Greenspan and Coinbase, Inc.

    Now, what comes next? Aaron applies for a license to issue digital currency in Florida. Website is here:

    archive.org/details/coinbasefloridamtl

    It gets even more interesting:

    Aaron was charged in connection with a criminal complaint for False Claims Violations and Fraud in United States v. Yurygrenadyor, Case No. 09-CV-7891, although the charges were dismissed.

    None of this information has ever been disclosed to his donors and perhaps his investors. He is a conman with a slick sales pitch. He wants to help people help others, especially the needy, through technology. But its all lies. He is an abrasive, ill-tempered man with poor business judgment and completely lacking in ethics.

    When I met Aaron I thought he was out to change the world. He was idenpendently wealthy. He wanted others to help him through his foundation change the world through technology. But he will talk to you until your check clears. The moment it does, all promises are off. What are you are actually funding is Aaron Greenspan and no one else. And his foundation is nothing more than a sham and he is likely to lose his 501(c)(3) certification. I have sent in an email to the IRS through their reporting service. I have filed suit in state court to get return of my money and I am wondering if Aaron has hit other people up for donations to his foundation? Did he disclose how many times he has been sued or sued himself? Did he disclose to you his selection process of what gets included and what does in Plain Site and how he sets up pages to defame people? Is anyone else owed money? Did you guys know that you are funding Aaron Greenspan’s endless series of frivolous lawsuits? His defamation campaigns? His advertisements? Please report it here.

    This is what happens in society when you allow mentally ill Narcisstic Sociopath’s like Aaron Greenspan to have access to the Internet.

    22 Votes
  • Ku
    Kumars Ptel Aug 14, 2018

    Aaron Greendpan id the aluas John Fuenchem who harasses and stalks all the people who run courtlistener.com.

    Goigle has received so many complaonts and documentedpolice complaints about his abusive behaviour that they have slowed his crap down on plainsite.org. Ha, ha! So now he’s making less money. Google needs to completely shut down the entire plainsite.org. Its a criminal extortion racket!

    Aaron also has many sliases on Reddit.com. One being bcbincs thst he uses to harass, stalk and troll people.

    29 Votes
  • Ww
    www.thinkcomputer.org Aug 14, 2018

    @Kumars Ptel Robert Ambrogi is a hero. He was the one who exposed Aaron Greenspan for using the sockpupet John Fuenchem. Now Aaron Greenspan is going to stalk Robert Ambrogi and threaten him. People have been posting for years that Aaron Greenspan harasses and calls his victims all the time. Aaron Greenspan is paranoid and has schizophrenia. Aaron Greenspan has been calling me 2 twice a month for the last 3 years. Sometimes he pretends he is mafia boss. Why hasn't Aaron Greenspan been locked up yet??

    27 Votes
  • Ku
    Kumars Ptel Aug 14, 2018

    bcboncs

    28 Votes
  • St
    Stop short selling Tesla May 25, 2019

    @Kumars Ptel Large Black Mercedes SUV driven by this guy down the wrong way west bound;

    23 Votes
  • Ma
    Masood 1 Aug 14, 2018

    What is wrong with Aaron Greenspan .

    This is disgusting. Aaron Greenspan made a profile to find a boyfriend. Look at this link. He looks craaaaaaaazy .

    https://reportcheater.com/aaron-greenspan-plainsite-org/

    30 Votes
  • Th
    thinkcomputer.org Aug 15, 2018

    I have a serious question since having interaction with Aaron J Greenspan last week. Is Aaron Greenspan autistic like his brother Simon Greenspan. They both seem to have temper tantrums. Aaron Greenspan figured no one will higher an autistic person so he started his own fake company. Aaron is also a pathological liar. I wasted an hour of my life talked to dirt.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.cleveland.com/metro/2011/08/simon_greenspans_plight_raises.amp

    Think Computer Foundation
    www.thinkcomputer.org

    29 Votes
  • Ww
    WWW.Aarongreenspan.com Aug 15, 2018

    Business Insider knew Aaron Greenspan is a parasite years ago. They spelled the pycopath last name incorrectly a few times. Rofl Aaron Greenspan is more like a pile of dung because he smells and looks disgusting. Aaron Greenspan loves to harrass people and should be locked up in a hospital .

    https://www.businessinsider.com/parasite-the-aaron-greenberg-story-2009-5

    Facebook Settles With Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard Classmate
    Matt Mireles May 26, 2009, 2:19 PM
    facebook tbi
    Facebook has settled its trademark dispute with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's schoolmate Aaron Greenspan.
    In July 2006, Greenspan petitioned the US Patent & Trademark Office, asking that they revoke Facebook's trademark rights to "Facebook, " "Face Book, " "Universal Face Book" and "Face Net."

    Then -- and until now -- Aaron claimed that Mark Zuckerberg got his idea for Facebook and it's name only after the two had discussed plans for a project called "the Face Book" in 2003.

    We're not lawyers, but we're pretty sure Aaron never had much of a case. According to Harvard's Citizen Media Law Project:

    A trademark is a sign, mark, or indicator used by an individual, business, or organization to identity a product or service as its own and to distinguish the product or service from those of its competitors. A business name generally can be protected as a trademark under federal and state trademark law.

    Trademark law is designed to avoid consumer confusion over the trademarks that businesses or other organizations use in connection with their goods and services.

    To be eligible for protection, trademarks have to be either a) distinctive, or b) f amous. It may not have been in 2003, but by 2006, Facebook was definitely famous. That fame gives Facebook a very strong claim to the trademark. In legalese, they've built up mountains of "good will, " and with it, the attention (and lawsuits) of people like Greenberg.

    26 Votes
  • Aaron J Greenspan aka Aaron Jacob Greenspan aka John Fuenchem is very sick individual who taunts people and portray the victim. Aaron Greenspan refuses to remove names from Google search. Aaron Greenspan has no respect for anyone . Plainsite.org is hurting minorities and preventing to find work. Think Computer Foundation is a fraudulent charity and has done nothing put help the Greeenspans avoid paying the IRS and finding friends to his retarted brother Simom keene Greenspan.

    Business Insider knew Aaron Greenspan is a parasite years ago. Rofl Aaron Greenspan is more like a pile of dung because he smells and looks disgusting. Aaron Greenspan loves to harrass people and should be locked up in a hospital .

    https://www.businessinsider.com/parasite-the-aaron-greenberg-story-2009-5

    31 Votes
  • I have unfortunately have met Aaron Greenspan. I'm 100% Aaron has has a mental illness. We used to call him Bill Gates. Madden shooter David Katz has the same sick look as Aaron Greenspan. David Katz had been hospitalized for mental illness before and went on for revenge shooting spree. Aaron Greenspan does also look like Adam Lanza.

    Mark Zuckerberg has 16 bodyguards to protect him at home and spends 20k a day on security. I'm going to take a guess and pretty sure it was something to do with Aaron Greenspan the CEO of plainsite, think computer corporation and think computer foundation .

    29 Votes
  • My
    Mystery Train 8 Aug 27, 2018

    If anyone out there still has any doubt about Aaron Greenspan a Hacker then the following article will clear all doubts about the fact that Aaron Greenspan is a criminal Hacker!

    The article can be looked up on the search engines: Aaron Greenspan ABOVE THE LAW from June 18. 2012.

    COPYRIGHT, DEFAMATION, DEPOSITIONS, FACEBOOK, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SOCIAL MEDIA, SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES, TECHNOLOGY
    Facebook Litigation Continues: A Closer Look at Aaron Greenspan
    Was Aaron Greenspan the programmer Facebook forgot? Let's hear, in his own words, the story of his various lawsuits against the social network…
    By CHRISTOPHER DANZIG
    Jun 18, 2012 at 4:46 PM
    Last month, we wrote about another in the increasingly long list of Facebook creation story-related lawsuits. The plaintiff in that story was Aaron Greenspan, a college classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. While Greenspan was in school, he created a similar social network to what eventually became Facebook.

    Greenspan alleges that he was unfairly omitted from The Social Network, the 2011 film purportedly telling the history of Facebook. Greenspan felt so jilted at being left out of the movie that he sued the company that published The Accidental Billionaires, on which the hit movie was based (affiliate links).

    As of of our last story, Greenspan’s suit alleging “defamation by omission” had just been dismissed by a Massachusetts federal judge.

    But he appealed the decision to the First Circuit. Over the weekend, he also emailed us, and gave us more detail about his story. Let’s check in and hear what he has to say, along with a colorful deposition story from the old ConnectU case. There’s more than meets the eye to this tenacious programmer turned Facebook nemesis…

    I received the following email from Aaron Greenspan on Sunday afternoon (the entire note is reprinted on the following page):

    In your article on May 14th (https://abovethelaw.com/2012/05/another-one-of-zuckerbergs-former-classmates-tries-and-fails-to-cash-in-on-facebook/) you portrayed me as a hanger-on trying to get rich off of a tenuous connection to Facebook. You also compared me to Paul Ceglia and the Winklevoss twins. You don’t have your facts straight, and the comparison is insulting.

    First of all, I already settled with both Mark and Facebook in 2009, which I don’t think you mentioned in your post. See http://newsroom.fb.com/News/Facebook-and-Think-Computer-Corporation-Resolve-Trademark-Dispute-c6.aspx. While I certainly won’t complain if I’m ultimately awarded damages in the Mezrich case, your implied assertion that the suit is primarily motivated by money is not even close to true. I sued Mezrich because I’d had enough of listening to his lies and his three-hour interview on C-SPAN in November, 2011 was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Back to School with Legal Talk Network
    The classroom isn’t the only place where you can learn new things to show off at parties or outsmart your siblings.

    LEGAL TALK NETWORK
    (For the record, I did briefly mention the settlement in the story. But that is neither here nor there.)

    Greenspan says his fight is not simply not about the money. It’s about trying to correct big-picture unfairness that it seems has been difficult to escape:

    I understand why you might be skeptical, but that’s exactly why I filed this suit. I shouldn’t be forced to battle that skepticism all my life.

    For what it’s worth, shortly after we published our first story about Greenspan, a tipster wrote to us who has a fairly impressive view of Zuckerberg’s former classmate:

    Extremely interesting guy. I know the lawsuit you wrote about is pretty frivolous, but he is only pursuing it because he really was kind of screwed in a way.

    Aaron… wrote software that was way ahead of its time and really did everything and more that “The Facebook” did at Harvard. When Aaron was at Harvard, it morphed into a system that allowed classmates to share reviews about classes and buy and sell used textbooks. There is no doubt in my mind that Zuckerberg borrowed — stole, if you will — fundamental aspects from Greenspan’s system when Zuckerberg designed his.

    Now, the design elements were not patented or copyrighted, so Greenspan was not able to pursue a lawsuit, but I can see why it would be pretty tough for him to sit and watch Zuckerberg become as wealthy and famous as he is while Greenspan became just another “classmate.” I suspect that Greenspan has more raw intelligence when it comes to coding. So, I think that is important insight into the BS lawsuit about defamation by omission. Greenspan is really upset that history, wealth and fame have omitted him.… Alas, life is not fair.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): Greenspan had this to say about our tipster’s note: “houseSYSTEM [the program he designed that, as the New York Times reported in 2007, was in some ways similar to Facebook] was copyrighted. I didn’t pursue a lawsuit because there weren’t any lawyers who would give me the time of day, and I didn’t know enough back then to do it myself.”

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Online Reputation Management Steps For Lawyers
    Reputation management has become more important than ever. Knowing how to respond to online reviews both effectively and ethically is key.

    MYCASE
    Our tipster also provided a comical, somewhat impressive anecdote about Greenspan:

    There also is a funny story I heard about a deposition in the Connect U case. The lawyers had technical problems, and Aaron took it upon himself to solve the issue.He unplugged a cord and all the lawyers gasped because they feared that the transcript and/or recording from the day’s session was lost. One of the lawyers questioned him about it, and Aaron looked at him condescendingly and said, “I think I know what I’m doing….”

    Later, they plugged in a computer with a projector so they could pull up some code and question Aaron about it. With a keyboard in front of him, he took all of about 3 minutes to hack into the law firm’s system and display their files on the screen, again to the horror of the lawyers. The lawyer I talked to said it was a pretty amusing moment and did highlight his computer acumen.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): For his part, Greenspan says he does not remember this happening at the ConnectU deposition.

    Check out Greenspan’s brief (and the appendix) in the defamation-by-omission case, which he filed pro se on June 13. To be fair, it is a bit dense and hard to follow. And it’s not the only Facebook-related litigation he is still involved in. Greenspan is also involved fighting Facebook about a program he created called FaceCash. As Greenspan explained in a follow-up email:

    After the settlement with Facebook in 2009, I began building a mobile payment system called FaceCash (http://www.facecash.com), and planned to release other products that made productive use of facial recognition technology as well. (Well before Facebook, Inc. was around, I took a course on the psychology of facial recognition freshman year in college, and ended up building http://www.faceblind.org, so it’s been an interest of mine for a while.) I registered a few trademarks with the USPTO accordingly. Facebook opposed one of them, for FACEMAIL. The docket is located at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91198355&pty=OPP. It’s not related to Mezrich at all, and only tangentially relates to the settlement issues.

    As it so happens, FaceCash is also tied up in litigation now, but that’s a whole different story unrelated to anything else. You can find that at https://www.facecash.com/legal/brown.html. It’s probably the most interesting and under-reported story of them all.

    Who knows where this clearly intelligent, combative programmer will end up. I’m not sure what the lesson here is, if there’s anything to be learned all. Maybe — especially if some of his claims are really true — it’s that life just isn’t fair.

    But to put a positive spin on it, you could quote John Updike, describing the best qualities in his famous character, Rabbit Angstrom: “[Y]ou haven’t given up. In your stupid way you’re still fighting.”

    Go through to the next page to see Greenspan’s original email, more links to court documents, and links to his personal project websites…

    1 2NEXT »
    TOPICS

    Aaron Greenspan, Ben Mezrich, ConnectU, Copyright, Defamation, Defamation by Omission, Depositions, Facebook, FaceCash, Federal Judges, Harvard, Intellectual Property, Mark Zuckerberg, Social Media, Social Networking Websites, Technology, The Accidental Billionaires, The Social Network, Winklevoss Twins

    EVOLVE THE LAW DIRECTORY
    CONSULTING
    Customers
    Biglaw, Consumers, Corporations, Government, Small Law Firms, Solo Practitioners
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    Customers
    Biglaw, Corporations, Small Law Firms

    Featured Customers
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    Customers
    Biglaw, Consumers, Corporations, Small Law Firms, Solo Practitioners

    00:12 / 00:30

    TOP ARTICLES
    1/6
    The Law School That Will Prime You For
    Public Service

    Love ATL? Let's make it official.
    Sign up for our newsletter.

    News (daily updates)
    Bonus Alerts (real-time alerts)
    Partner Issues
    Small Law Firms
    In-House Counsel
    Legal Technology
    ATL Law Schools
    ATL Careers
    ATL Small Firm Resource Center

    We will never sell or share your information without your consent. See our privacy policy.
    POPULAR ARTICLES

    Senator Cancels Meeting With SCOTUS Nominee After Accusing Trump Of Being ‘Unindicted Co-Conspirator In Criminal Matter’

    The Most Vile Law School Essay You’ll Ever Read

    Law School Professor Drops The N-Word In The First Week Of Class

    Want A Job (As A Lawyer) When You Graduate? Check Out This Law School

    This Law School Knows How To Get You The Job Of Your Dreams — Assuming That Dream Is Biglaw

    Federal Judge Engages In 10-Hour Armed Standoff With Police Before Killing Himself

    Departure Memo Subtly Burns Biglaw Firm Straight To Hell

    Mary Jo White Helps Powerful Football Coach Avoid ‘Responsibility’ Or ‘Real Consequences’

    Allen Weisselberg Immunity Deal Shows Prosecutors Are Going After Trump Family, Not Trump Organization

    A Sexual Harassment Suit Against A Prominent Law Firm

    Oh, The Onion Knows Exactly Why So Many People Are Applying To Law School Right Now

    The Latest Biglaw Merger Is Sure To Be A ‘Home Run’

    Biglaw Partner Accused Of Masturbating At The Gym

    The Bizarre Statements Of A Juror From The Manafort Trial

    Florida Judge Has Moment Of Racist Stupidity, Followed Immediately By Ultimate Clarity
    FROM THE ABOVE THE LAW NETWORK
    View from the Bench: Interview with Chief Judge Bowdre, Alabama District Judge
    THOMSON REUTERS
    How to Implement Payment Plans at Your Law Firm
    CLIO
    Early Adopter Firm Goes Live On 3E In The Cloud
    THOMSON REUTERS
    How to Open Your Law Firm’s Second Office
    CLIO
    Get the latest legal updates for litigation attorneys
    THOMSON REUTERS
    Which Legal Practice Management Software Is the Best?
    CLIO
    In-House Counsel File: An Interview with Julia Brncic of Express Scripts’
    THOMSON REUTERS
    A Breakdown Of The Scotus Confirmation Process
    LAWLINE CLE
    7 comments
    (hidden for your protection)
    comments sponsored by

    SHOW ALL COMMENTS
    7 RESPONSES TO “FACEBOOK LITIGATION CONTINUES: A CLOSER LOOK AT AARON GREENSPAN”
    Guest says:
    June 18, 2012 at 4:56 PM
    Nice post Chris.

    ZZZZZZZZZZZ says:
    June 18, 2012 at 5:13 PM
    FaceYawn

    The_Haterade says:
    June 18, 2012 at 5:13 PM
    AngryFacebookDude!!

    Bike Dude says:
    June 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM
    Wow, Chris has demonstrated an ability to write something while avoiding the topic of e-Discovery. As my friends in “Workaholics” say, that’s “tight butthole.”

    ChrisDanzig says:
    June 18, 2012 at 5:25 PM
    Haha, thanks, I think?

    The office camping trip is definitely my favorite Workaholics episode.

    BluePantsChick says:
    June 18, 2012 at 5:25 PM
    Hai Chris — call me.

    Andrew J says:
    June 27, 2012 at 2:05 PM
    Hah! I love it. I went to high school with this kid, and even back then he was one of the most obnoxious, arrogant people I’ve ever met. It’s somewhat comical to see him fail so publicly and then react with this righteous indignation.

    It’s like he felt he was the second coming of Steve Jobs and that’s being unrightfully ripped away from him.

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Now Available: 3E in the Cloud
    Get all the advantages of working in the cloud with the first SaaS financial management solution
    THOMSON REUTERS

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    5 Tips to Select AI Technology You Can Trust
    Know what to consider to be sure an AI solution provides real value for you.
    THOMSON REUTERS WESTLAW EDGE
    SPONSORED CONTENT

    InfoTrack Changes The Game Once Again With Simplified E-Filing In Illinois
    InfoTrack is entering the electronic filing game, and revolutionizing it in the process.

    STEPHANIE WILKINS

    RECENT JOBS
    Mid- to Senior Level Environmental Associate Attorney
    Location: Denver, Colorado
    posted by Kinney Recruiting LLC
    Senior Legal Editor, Patent Litigation
    Location: Anywhere, United States
    posted by Thomson Reuters
    Fun Rock Star Jr. Lit Atty Sought by DC Boutique
    Location: Washington, DC
    posted by Gateway Legal Placements
    Senior Counsel, Products
    Location: Mountain View, California
    posted by Ana Zavala
    Energy Regulatory Associate
    Location: Washington, DC, United States
    posted by Stoel Rives LLP
    VIEW ALL »

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    WeWork is offering up to 10% off to ATL Readers
    Transform your workspace, available in over 75 cities.

    WEWORK
    SPONSORED CONTENT

    A Brief History of Legal Research
    Legal research used to be found in dusty books – now, you can access it in a variety of ways.
    BRIAN DALTON

    OUR SITES

    Above the Law How Appealing ATL Redline Breaking Defense Breaking Energy Breaking Gov Dealbreaker Fashonista MedCity News
    © 2018 Breaking Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Registration or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

    ×

    19 Votes
  • My
    Mystery Train 8 Aug 27, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is a Hacker and the people close to him know this full well. Aaron Greenspan hacks in to people's emails, Servers, Social Media Accounts, phones and spies on people and companies to try and get information on people and companies to then use any dirt he can find for extortion purposes and to ruin a person or company.

    We don't understand why he is allowed to roam free and even go near a computer because he should be arrested, especially when he threatens the President of the United States. Yes, Aaron Greenspan has made death threats towards the President of the United States on July 13, 2008 and at other times before that. Aaron Greenspan is calculating Sociopath.

    COPYRIGHT, DEFAMATION, DEPOSITIONS, FACEBOOK, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SOCIAL MEDIA, SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES, TECHNOLOGY
    Facebook Litigation Continues: A Closer Look at Aaron Greenspan
    Was Aaron Greenspan the programmer Facebook forgot? Let's hear, in his own words, the story of his various lawsuits against the social network…
    By CHRISTOPHER DANZIG
    Jun 18, 2012 at 4:46 PM
    Last month, we wrote about another in the increasingly long list of Facebook creation story-related lawsuits. The plaintiff in that story was Aaron Greenspan, a college classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. While Greenspan was in school, he created a similar social network to what eventually became Facebook.

    Greenspan alleges that he was unfairly omitted from The Social Network, the 2011 film purportedly telling the history of Facebook. Greenspan felt so jilted at being left out of the movie that he sued the company that published The Accidental Billionaires, on which the hit movie was based (affiliate links).

    As of of our last story, Greenspan’s suit alleging “defamation by omission” had just been dismissed by a Massachusetts federal judge.

    But he appealed the decision to the First Circuit. Over the weekend, he also emailed us, and gave us more detail about his story. Let’s check in and hear what he has to say, along with a colorful deposition story from the old ConnectU case. There’s more than meets the eye to this tenacious programmer turned Facebook nemesis…

    I received the following email from Aaron Greenspan on Sunday afternoon (the entire note is reprinted on the following page):

    In your article on May 14th (https://abovethelaw.com/2012/05/another-one-of-zuckerbergs-former-classmates-tries-and-fails-to-cash-in-on-facebook/) you portrayed me as a hanger-on trying to get rich off of a tenuous connection to Facebook. You also compared me to Paul Ceglia and the Winklevoss twins. You don’t have your facts straight, and the comparison is insulting.

    First of all, I already settled with both Mark and Facebook in 2009, which I don’t think you mentioned in your post. See http://newsroom.fb.com/News/Facebook-and-Think-Computer-Corporation-Resolve-Trademark-Dispute-c6.aspx. While I certainly won’t complain if I’m ultimately awarded damages in the Mezrich case, your implied assertion that the suit is primarily motivated by money is not even close to true. I sued Mezrich because I’d had enough of listening to his lies and his three-hour interview on C-SPAN in November, 2011 was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Back to School with Legal Talk Network
    The classroom isn’t the only place where you can learn new things to show off at parties or outsmart your siblings.

    LEGAL TALK NETWORK
    (For the record, I did briefly mention the settlement in the story. But that is neither here nor there.)

    Greenspan says his fight is not simply not about the money. It’s about trying to correct big-picture unfairness that it seems has been difficult to escape:

    I understand why you might be skeptical, but that’s exactly why I filed this suit. I shouldn’t be forced to battle that skepticism all my life.

    For what it’s worth, shortly after we published our first story about Greenspan, a tipster wrote to us who has a fairly impressive view of Zuckerberg’s former classmate:

    Extremely interesting guy. I know the lawsuit you wrote about is pretty frivolous, but he is only pursuing it because he really was kind of screwed in a way.

    Aaron… wrote software that was way ahead of its time and really did everything and more that “The Facebook” did at Harvard. When Aaron was at Harvard, it morphed into a system that allowed classmates to share reviews about classes and buy and sell used textbooks. There is no doubt in my mind that Zuckerberg borrowed — stole, if you will — fundamental aspects from Greenspan’s system when Zuckerberg designed his.

    Now, the design elements were not patented or copyrighted, so Greenspan was not able to pursue a lawsuit, but I can see why it would be pretty tough for him to sit and watch Zuckerberg become as wealthy and famous as he is while Greenspan became just another “classmate.” I suspect that Greenspan has more raw intelligence when it comes to coding. So, I think that is important insight into the BS lawsuit about defamation by omission. Greenspan is really upset that history, wealth and fame have omitted him.… Alas, life is not fair.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): Greenspan had this to say about our tipster’s note: “houseSYSTEM [the program he designed that, as the New York Times reported in 2007, was in some ways similar to Facebook] was copyrighted. I didn’t pursue a lawsuit because there weren’t any lawyers who would give me the time of day, and I didn’t know enough back then to do it myself.”

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Online Reputation Management Steps For Lawyers
    Reputation management has become more important than ever. Knowing how to respond to online reviews both effectively and ethically is key.

    MYCASE
    Our tipster also provided a comical, somewhat impressive anecdote about Greenspan:

    There also is a funny story I heard about a deposition in the Connect U case. The lawyers had technical problems, and Aaron took it upon himself to solve the issue.He unplugged a cord and all the lawyers gasped because they feared that the transcript and/or recording from the day’s session was lost. One of the lawyers questioned him about it, and Aaron looked at him condescendingly and said, “I think I know what I’m doing….”

    Later, they plugged in a computer with a projector so they could pull up some code and question Aaron about it. With a keyboard in front of him, he took all of about 3 minutes to hack into the law firm’s system and display their files on the screen, again to the horror of the lawyers. The lawyer I talked to said it was a pretty amusing moment and did highlight his computer acumen.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): For his part, Greenspan says he does not remember this happening at the ConnectU deposition.

    Check out Greenspan’s brief (and the appendix) in the defamation-by-omission case, which he filed pro se on June 13. To be fair, it is a bit dense and hard to follow. And it’s not the only Facebook-related litigation he is still involved in. Greenspan is also involved fighting Facebook about a program he created called FaceCash. As Greenspan explained in a follow-up email:

    After the settlement with Facebook in 2009, I began building a mobile payment system called FaceCash (http://www.facecash.com), and planned to release other products that made productive use of facial recognition technology as well. (Well before Facebook, Inc. was around, I took a course on the psychology of facial recognition freshman year in college, and ended up building http://www.faceblind.org, so it’s been an interest of mine for a while.) I registered a few trademarks with the USPTO accordingly. Facebook opposed one of them, for FACEMAIL. The docket is located at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91198355&pty=OPP. It’s not related to Mezrich at all, and only tangentially relates to the settlement issues.

    As it so happens, FaceCash is also tied up in litigation now, but that’s a whole different story unrelated to anything else. You can find that at https://www.facecash.com/legal/brown.html. It’s probably the most interesting and under-reported story of them all.

    Who knows where this clearly intelligent, combative programmer will end up. I’m not sure what the lesson here is, if there’s anything to be learned all. Maybe — especially if some of his claims are really true — it’s that life just isn’t fair.

    But to put a positive spin on it, you could quote John Updike, describing the best qualities in his famous character, Rabbit Angstrom: “[Y]ou haven’t given up. In your stupid way you’re still fighting.”

    Go through to the next page to see Greenspan’s original email, more links to court documents, and links to his personal project websites…

    1 2NEXT »
    TOPICS

    Aaron Greenspan, Ben Mezrich, ConnectU, Copyright, Defamation, Defamation by Omission, Depositions, Facebook, FaceCash, Federal Judges, Harvard, Intellectual Property, Mark Zuckerberg, Social Media, Social Networking Websites, Technology, The Accidental Billionaires, The Social Network, Winklevoss Twins

    22 Votes
  • Fr
    Freedom of Speech Homie! Sep 29, 2018

    Just exercising our Freedom of Speech. So, please do not remove anything on this comments and that includes the pictures. Everything posted here is protected under the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech.

    Aaron Greenspan snitched Aaron Swartz out

    The US Court system and the United States has to remove URL's from the Search Engines when these URL's are being uploaded for nefarious purposes by private citizens who only have the goal of wanting to make money with the public's information. This is not allowed in any other country in the world.

    Now if one is not a United States Citizen and they come from a country that applies GDPR then the website's like plainsite.org need to immediately comply and remove that person's URL's when they request to have it removed. And they have to do it immediately. If Aaron Greenspan were living in the EU he would have been arrested and imprisoned a long time ago because Aaron Greenspan is using the Freedom of Speech to justify his criminal behaviors and let's not forget that Aaron Greenspan is well known HACKER.

    As a matter of fact Aaron Greenspan ratted Aaron Swartz out to the MIT Police about Aaron Swartz's upcoming hacking and downloading of all the MIT's information, as Aaron Swartz left his computer hooked up to the cables that accessed MIT's Servers to download all of this information, which was of course illegal but he was only caught because Aaron Greenspan snitched on him to the MIT Police before Aaron Swartz even initiated the hacking. The MIT Police along with the Feds had already set up a hidden camera in that storage room to get it all on video as Aaron Swartz hacked in to and downloaded MIT's sensitive information.

    Many people are wondering how is Aaron Greenspan getting away with everything that he is getting away with? Abusing people's privacy, ruining people's careers, reputations, lives, hacking all over the place, including in to foreign countries and a lot more illegal things?
    Well people are you really that stupid? Let me put it in plainsite for the public. Aaron Greenspan is working both sides of the fence and as he helped the MIT Police catch Aaron Swartz then went and did some sob speech in front of all of his family and friends when it was Aaron Greenspan who caused Aaron Swartz to get caught and charged. This is what Aaron Greenspan is doing all over the place he is working both sides of the fence and that's why the Feds have not arrested him yet.

    Aaron Greenspan is getting away with things that most people would never be able to get away with.
    Figure that one out?

    26 Votes
  • An
    Another Harvard unibomber Mar 22, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    White night!! LOL More like loco hospital patient.

    57 Votes
  • He
    He's a wannabe Apr 17, 2019

    @Another Harvard unibomber Who does this family know at the Huffington Post to be writing up all these made up fictional lies and tales?

    45 Votes
  • Me
    mental illness family Mar 24, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    If someone put this sociopath out of business personally, I would buy them a drink. These scums ought to be run out of town or put in jail. P.S. It's so obvious that he posts on this site. it's not even funny, it's just sad and pathetic.

    57 Votes
  • No
    No Free.Law date to sicopath AG Mar 24, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    He has harrased and victimised us for years.There are numerous storys on him if you google his name.Even though he has pleaded guilty to it all he still has the nerve to deny it.You are a liar who should be in prison where you belong instead of of harrassing and trying to destroy peoples lives whose path you cross.Ihave decided to add some links here so the public are aware of how much of a liar he really is.This links are from his last court case where he pleaded guilty

    53 Votes
  • Cl
    Claire Bourdes Apr 07, 2019

    @No Free.Law date to sicopath AG Read that he is the alias John Fuenchem with a fake Yahoo email account that when traced it came back as if it was in Toronto but we know that Aaron Greenspan is behind this harassment. This alias John Fuenchem sent emails to Mike Lissner's personal or work email that only close people could know like Aaron Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan hacked in to many Twitter accounts of the followers of Free Law Project and tried to make them look bad to the followers.

    51 Votes
  • We
    We love Santa Cruz Apr 10, 2019

    @Claire Bourdes Aaron Greenspan is mentally ill and his father like son both think that they are self-proclaimed journalists. They enjoy telling one-sided stories that are full of exaggerated lies and fiction so that it fits their narratives.
    Neil S Greenspan created Think Computer Corporation in 1998 and then Think Computer Foundation in 2000 and he is the VP and Treasurer and put his schlemiel son Aaron Greenspan at the helm so that attention is not brought to Neil S Greenspan who invented all of this. Neil S Greenspan works at Case Western Reserve University as some sort of professor. The mother Judith Keene Greenspan is also on the business documents as a co-owner and she never really worked in her life. She just inherited money and the company Keene Promotions.
    We have been harassed and Stalk by Aaron Greenspan for a long time now and he does not leave people alone. There is something not right with Aaron Greenspan in the head. We are going to serve Aaron Greenspan legal documents on May 2, 2019, at 1:30 pm at the Santa Clara Superior Court in San Jose, California. Aaron Greenspan has destroyed our lives with his constant harassment and stalking.

    40 Votes
  • Pl
    Plainsite.org is the next UNABOBMER Mar 28, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Little sissy extortionist!!

    55 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron.Greenspan stalker Apr 04, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    You are exactly right, Think Computer Foundation
    And plainsite.org is ran by a few fraudsters, one of them is Aaron Greenspan and the other is Neil S Greenspan who happens to think he's some sort of rich pimp or something.. he claims to make zero income a year (ya right) from his scummy operations plainsite.org.

    They are currently running the scam via their other website plainsite.orgnd trying to extort money from people with the whole fake libel reports. I've already reported them to the FTC, local police and Ohio Attorney General's office and I encourage you to do the same.

    EXPOSE THEM FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE: A bunch of idiot white rich scammers trying to illegally steal money from people because they are poor and Hispanics or black or immigrants.

    46 Votes
  • Go
    Google vic Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Do not trust neil as he frequents sex sites and harassing women online. He has posted photos of his genitals looking for casual sex. Neil is a former drug addict, verbally and physically abusive toward women. If you do not reply to neil he will curse at women and call them rude when in fact he is the time waster with a very low I.Q. that is only seeking sx.

    52 Votes
  • Te
    Telsa Cleveland Employee Apr 09, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    This is very scary. Neil Greenspan came to my Tesla dealership and started taking pictures of everything. Neil started yelling about fraud, Judge Nathan, SEC and Tesla ponzi scheme. Neil gave me a business card that he is a reporter for the Huff post and Dr professor at case western reserve university . THIS GUY IS MENTAL . He said he was going to sue me because I bumped into him and his shoulder is in pain.

    Neil yells out to me other customers and tells me oh you are here to buy the car now. As I walk back to where he is and he says oh you could not afford those expensive cars . When I walked in he tells me you can't come in here only if you are going to buy a car from Tesla.

    He then kept asking other customers questions about budget what kind of payments they where interested in with attitude his curteousness went out the window. Neil Greenspan was upset not letting me test drive the car. Then neil asked for a coupon and 5$ gift card .

    I gave him dirty look and almost called the authorities. Becarefell if this crazy sicopath comes near you.

    54 Votes
  • Ve
    Veronica Ll Apr 11, 2019

    @Telsa Cleveland Employee You should have immediately on the spot and without delay called the police and had them charged with disturbing the peace, trespassing, and threats. With these types of clowns, one cannot be nice and diplomatic. They only understand one thing and that is that they will be immediately arrested and sent to prison if they do not immediately stop with their insane behaviors. People need to call the Police immediately if these idiots start harassing and threatening people with their hot air threats.

    47 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan and Neil S Greenspan are writing "filler" nonsense to distract from their transgressions as serial harasses and data miners of the public's personal information for their monetary gains.

    0 Votes

plainsite.org under fraudulent 501c think computer [censor] father neil s greenspan is the vp and treasurer

Aaron Greenspan and his father Neil S Greenspan the VP and Treasurer of plainsite.org are two very sick Sociopath's. One has to feel sorry for Aaron Greenspan's Mother having married total Psychotic Sociopath like Neil S Greenspan and then producing two sons who have issues. The really dangerous Sociopath is Aaron Jacob Greenspan who enjoys going in to the Federal Pacer system where people's personal legal cases are and then this Sociopath selectively downloads legal cases, then this Sociopath uploads the most harmful information on to his vicious monetized website plainsite.org, in order to intentionally destroy people's careers, reputations, families and lives.

Aaron Greenspan is a sick Sociopath who fully enjoys dishing things out to other people, in order to defame, destroy and shame people online but he doesn't enjoy receiving his own medicine.

Aaron Greenspan belongs locked up in a Psychiatric Hospital where he was locked up in Cleveland, Ohio for 6 months at the age of 16 and heavily sedated and placed on the medication Haldol. We all knew this in Shaker Heights, Ohio that there was something completely off with this Sociopath Aaron Jacob Greenspan. Just the looks and insane stares that Aaron Jacob Greenspan would give people was like freaky.

It should be noted that Aaron Jacob Greenspan's father Neil S Greenspan has that same Psychotic look in his eyes. We can't believe this guy can even hold a job and if the University where he works found out about all of his IRS tax fraud schemes, psychiatric issues with him and his family and the danger that he poses to students with his Sociopathy we think that his employer would fire him immediately as he should. Nobody should ever hire Neil S Greenspan. He should be locked up on a Psychiatric ward and medicated with Psychiatric drugs for both Neil S Greenspan and Aaron Jacob Greenspan are insane. In any other other country both Neil S Greenspan and Aaron Jacob Greenspan would be placed in a Psychiatric hospital and not allowed to produce any more Sociopathic children who are a danger and a menace to society at large.

Neil Sanford Greenspan with NPI Number [protected] works at UH Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland Ohio 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, Ohio USA, telephone [protected]
Fax: [protected]

Neil Sanford Greenspan age 65 and his wife Judith Keene Greenspan age 62 home address is the following:
20560 Shelburne
Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122

Home Value: $92, 000
Usage: Single Dwelling
Owner: Judith Keene Greenspan (because husband Neil Sanford Greenspan is worried about being sued by people when it comes to plainsite.org and the fraudulent 501c they are running and if the IRS finds out they will seize their assets and quick too)
Assessed Property Value: $103, 400
Assessed Land Value: $32, 520
Previous addresses:
858 Berick, Saint Louis, MO 63132
4701 Pine, Philadelphia, PA 19143
3715 Warrensville Center, Shaker Heights, OH 44122
4300 Osage, Philadelphia, PA 19104
BOC PO Box, Greensboro, NC 27420
715 Warrensville, Shaker Heights, OH 44121

  • This Sociopath is 100% a serious Hacker. He is a sick SOCIOPATH and a CRIMINAL!
    Aaron Greenspan doing business under the domain Plainsite.org pretends to make legal information available to anyone as a public service. While his mission initially sounds noble, he is nothing other than an internet scam artist. The Plainsite.org site selectively publishes legal proceedings of high profile individuals and then tries to charge the individuals a subscription fee to remove the postings. These are all published "under the punlic interest" of readers. Many of the items published are very old, incorrect, or intended to harm the named party. I have contacted Aaron Greenspan on behalf of a client, and was told that the incorrect and undesired information could be removed for a fee of $4500 USD. This fraud and blackmail should be shut down.

    85 Votes
  • Th
    ThinkComputerCorporation Aug 10, 2018

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! [email protected] is a fake charity. Judi Greenspan has been running this fake charity for years.

    20 Votes
  • Ma
    Masood 1 Aug 14, 2018

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! https://reportcheater.com/aaron-greenspan-plainsite-org/

    21 Votes
  • Co
    CourtListener - Free Law Project Sep 09, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! John Fuenchem is crazy Aaron Greenspan.

    24 Votes
  • No
    No Free.Law date to sicopath AG Mar 24, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! Sai - [email protected]
    Gavin Sheridan - [email protected] and Jose Alberto [email protected]
    David Donet Sr - [email protected]
    Ian Francis - [email protected]
    Kyle and ALex
    Michael Shurtleff - [email protected]
    Mark Deming - [email protected]
    Reed Jessen - [email protected] (interested in bi-directional API in May/June for use with Unified Patents)
    Surya Mattu - Guy I met at the Knight Foundation thing, now works for Gizmodo. Is building a PACER awareness bot for their slack channel. Only interested in the API once it can scrape new stuff. [email protected]
    Matt Channon - [email protected] building some kind of iOS tool called Habeas.
    David Gribbin ([email protected]) - kind of a random person that emailed. Gathering more info…
    Nikolaos Tsoukas - Interested I guess from research perspective. See email.
    David Kellum - Sqoop.com. Has some platform for helping journalists. Interested in RECAP Archive and Clearinghouse, but may not want to pay…not clear. Currently is scraping PACER RSS feeds.
    Nirav Patel ([email protected]) - Wants to use data to market to bankrupt people. Not ideal, but, hm.
    Jonathan Edward Germann ([email protected]) - Wants PACER data for research, I think.

    18 Votes
  • No
    No Free.Law date to sicopath AG Mar 24, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Christine Richard Talks About Her Deep Dive Research On Herbalife . Zero credibility. !!

    20 Votes
  • Pl
    @plainsite.org Apr 05, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! He is working with Jeff Steinport . Jeff Steinport owns part of @plainsite.org and other bad business below.
    Information as follows:

    Mr. Jeffrey Allen Steinport

    Education & Credentials
    Law School Attended:Thomas M. Cooley
    Year of First Admission:2012
    Admission:2015, Arizona; Michigan
    ISLN:922055998

    Chief Operating Officer and Chief Legal Officer @ Vianet Management, LLC
    Location Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
    Work Attorney in Private Practice @ Steinport Law PLC
    National Technology Director @ Advantage Sales & Marketing
    Board Member and Treasurer @ West Grand Neighborhood Organization
    Education 2008 2012 Juris Doctor in Business Transactions, International Law, General Practice @ Thomas M. Cooley Law School
    2001 2005 Bachelor of Science in Business Administration @ Ferris State University

    Last updated: 1/16/2019
    Jeff Steinport
    Regular Member
    Profile Link: http://www.grbar.org/member/jeffsteinport
    PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
    38 W Fulton St Ste 410
    Grand Rapids
    Michigan
    49503 [ Map ] 480 629-8003 (Phone)
    480 629-8003 (Fax)
    Profession: Legal
    Date Admitted to the State Bar: 11/1/2012
    Professional Title: COO/CLO
    Firm/Company Name: Vianet Management LLC

    JEFFREY A STEINPORT agent, United States flag EDU MAIL NETWORK LLC (Michigan (US), 18 Aug 1998- )
    JEFFREY A STEINPORT agent, United States flag F & J HOLDINGS LLC (Michigan (US), 3 Jun 1998- )

    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag nonprofit KENT COUNTY TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE (Michigan (US), 11 Jul 2013- )
    inactive JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag inactive nonprofit FREE TRADE LEAGUE, INC. (Michigan (US), 21 Nov 2000- 1 Oct 2010)
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag JS DOT GG LLC (Arizona (US), 12 Jan 2016- )
    JEFF STEINPORT manager, United States flag JS DOT GG LLC (Arizona (US), 12 Jan 2016- )
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag HAPPY HAPPY JOY JOY LLC (Michigan (US), 7 Apr 1999- )
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag ADEX SERVICES COMPANY LLC (Michigan (US), 11 Jan 2001- )
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag E.G.E. LC (Michigan (US), 5 Nov 2008- )
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag THE LEE/ALLEN GROUP LC (Michigan (US), 29 Nov 2004- )
    JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag JEFFERSON SUPPLY LLC (Michigan (US), 30 Nov 1998- )
    JEFF STEINPORT manager, United States flag branch ALAN AGENCY LLC (Arizona (US), 24 Feb 2016- )
    JEFF STEINPORT member, United States flag JS DOT GG LLC (Arizona (US), 12 Jan 2016- )
    inactive JEFF STEINPORT agent, United States flag inactive CLASSICAL EDUCATION, INC. (Michigan (US), 22 Dec 2004-15 Jul 2010)

    11 Votes
  • Sa
    Sanjay Juu Apr 13, 2019

    @No Free.Law date to sicopath AG Deep dive into corruption and extortion. Let's not forget lots of lies and scams as well.

    13 Votes
  • Ma
    Mal jange Apr 28, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! He cant respect the court and always causes distrubtion. He causes outbursts in court. Guard told Greenspan to shut his autistic outburt.

    Google can terminate your account for any reason, ” she told me.

    “Not any reason, ” I said. “Not because I have blue eyes. Or brown eyes.” After being told to quiet down by the courtroom guard, we decided that we had reached an impasse, exchanged documents, and went back into the court room.

    12 Votes
  • Ma
    Mal jange Apr 28, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Mal jange Here is the link
    http://www.federaljack.com/tag/cybercrime/

    13 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron.Greenspan Fraud Apr 29, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Mal jange Aaron Greenspan is hacker. FBI had came to his house and arrested. This guy is very disturbed because he wanted to be reimbursed for traveling to court and paid for getting caught. He hacked into 3 different companies and one being the United States of America other is Microsoft and 3rd Is pennymax.

    https://blog.simplejustice.us/2011/05/18/nobody-wants-to-hear-bad-things/

    https://fcw.com/articles/2006/01/13/gsa-takes-down-eoffer-after-finding-security-flaw.aspx?m=1

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/payroll-firm-pulls-web-services-citing-data-leak/

    http://msgroups.net/exchange.admin/smtp-500-5.3.3/326823

    http://www.federaljack.com/tag/cybercrime/

    http://archive.boston.com/business/articles/2005/03/01/payroll_website_still_not_secured/

    15 Votes
  • Pl
    Plainsite.org @plainsite.org fraud Apr 29, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! Extortionist wanted payment because he hacked into PayMaxx website.

    "I did tell them that there was a problem, and gave them several options to deal with it, and instead they chose to do nothing, " Greenspan said. "It is not my job to go around and fix problems for free."

    https://www.cnet.com/news/payroll-site-closes-on-security-worries/

    http://attrition.org/dataloss/2005/02/paymaxx02.html

    https://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/13/technology/web-site-of-agency-is-called-insecure.html

    https://geeknewscentral.com/2005/02/28/be-afraid-be-very-afraid/

    AARON GREENSPAN, PRESIDENT & CEO, THINK COMPUTER: You can call me a hacker. You can call me a security professional. You can call me whatever you want.

    http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0504/12/pzn.01.html

    Wrote a 6 page document to hack GSA Federal Contracts CDWG Government IT.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.computerworld.com/article/2561629/gsa-s-vendor-web-site-closed-to-fix-security-flaw.amp.html

    11 Votes
  • An
    Ann Romney Apr 29, 2019

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! More news on this hacker Greenspan Aaron.

    https://www.geek.com/news/exchange-flaw-allows-program-to-be-used-for-spam-553776/

    Aaron Greenspan hacked into South Station in Boston.

    Aaron Greenspan, 21, the chief executive officer of Think Computer Corp., was able to hack into the MBTA's South Station web site.

    https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2005/02/south-station-hack-shows-security-train.html

    He mentioned how Mark Zuckerberg made him have mental issues and he needs help.
    He is long overdue to be medicated and needs help.

    Greenspan says that the real value of the project was in the writing process. “It was either that or seeing a psychologist, ” he says. “I didn’t want to be a nervous wreck for my entire life because of something that happened when I was in college.”

    https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2009/9/22/dropping-the-h-bomb-when-an-expensive/

    Hacked into Fed Contract Website.

    https://corpwatch.org/article/us-fed-contract-website-found-insecure

    Hacked usernames

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-attack-can-steal-your-username-password-and-other-logins/

    10 Votes
  • Ha
    Harvard Mental Patient Apr 30, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! This loony toon had FBI agents come to his unibomber shack to arrest him for hacking into

    "Even though I had just graduated from Harvard, I knew virtually nothing about the law, and I found federal agents with guns accusing me of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030) to be intimidating. "

    CHECK THIS OUT.
    Juan: In your public testimonies, and clearly here as well, you have no qualms about naming and shaming individuals and companies. Why is that? This lose sick autistic low life makes fun of everyone who asks to remove their personal court documents.

    LOOK AT HIS RESPONCE ABOUT SHAMING. AARON GREENSPAN SAID SHAMMING [email protected]@#@
    Aaron: It works. If you really believe that someone or something should change, the best way to achieve that goal is to let them know. Sometimes telling a person to their face (or in writing) isn’t enough, and it requires broadcasting the message to a wider audience. Here, I can back up the claim that it’s an effective strategy with some evidence: the law in California has changed once, and it’s about to change a second time. My competitors’ business practices have changed, although not completely, and not fast enough. I think I’m generally a pretty friendly and unassuming person, but sadly, diplomacy does not effect change often enough, accurately enough, or fast enough to be a useful tool in high-stakes situations such as this. I tried. No one listened. Now they are listening.
    This entire Greenspans are savages.

    "My taxes pay them to do that, so I expect them to act accordingly and treat me with respect." THIS IS WHY AARON GREENSPAN DOES NOT PAY TAXES. THIS LUNITIC IS RUNNING THINK COMPUTER FOUNDATION.

    Aaron Greenspan is also stalking Jan Lynn Owen and Venchiarutti. GREENSPAN CREATED A WEBSITE TO SHAME AND BULLY.

    https://contrariancompliance.com/2014/10/02/my-taxes-pay-regulators-so-i-expect-them-to-treat-me-with-respect/

    14 Votes
  • @Harvard Mental Patient Report think computer foundation also Aaron Greenspan and Neil S Greenspan

    https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/About-AG/Contact/Report-A-Scam

    Report a Scam
    If you are the victim of a scam and need help, please use the consumer complaint form.

    To report a scam you have seen, use the form below.

    Please include:

    Contact information for the business
    As much detail about the scam as possible

    Help Center
    Toll-free: 800-282-0515

    Monday - Friday 8 a.m. - 7 p.m.

    Ohio Attorney General

    30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215

    BCI Tip Line
    Phone: 855-BCI-OHIO (855-224-6446)

    13 Votes
  • Vl
    Vladimir Putin Love May 03, 2019

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! Research here on Plainsite.org / Think Computer Foundation fraud.

    https://charitableregistration.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/charities/Research-Charities.aspx

    Report Aaron Greenspan scam chairty here.

    https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/About-AG/Contact/Report-A-Scam

    If you need additional information about a charity or want to file a complaint about a questionable organization, call the Attorney General’s Office at 800-282-0515 or file a complaint online at https://charitablecomplaint.ohioattorneygeneral.gov

    Learning about an organization and its activities can help donors make wise giving decisions. In addition to checking whether an organization is current with its registration requirements with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office, other good sources of information include:
    The IRS’s Exempt Organizations Selection Check can be used to verify if an organization has a valid 501(c)(3) or other tax-exempt designation. The IRS also lists organizations that have had their tax exempt status revoked.
    Private watchdog organizations often review data and reports on organizations and may grade them based on various spending standards and other procedures. Some of those groups are CharityWatch, Charity Navigator and the Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance. Your local Better Business Bureau may also be a resource and can be identified through the Wise Giving Alliance link above.
    The organization’s IRS Form 990 return can be viewed on Guidestar. A free registration process is required to access the reports. The 990 will include information on how the group raises and uses its funds, and other operational details about the group. Important details to pay attention to include what percent of expenditures are used on program expenses rather than management and fundraising expenses. Descriptions of programs and expenses are often revealing, as well as reported information about travel and compensation levels. Self-dealing transactions between the charity and one or more of its directors should also be examined.
    Internet searches can often reveal useful information about accomplishments of the organization, or information about questionable activities
    The organization’s written and web-based materials can also be an important source of information.
    If you wish to view additional information about a charity provided by the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS), you can search for the organization on the NCCS's website. You can look up the charity by using details such as name, EIN, location, organization type, etc.
    If you need additional information about a charity or want to file a complaint about a questionable organization, call the Attorney General’s Office at 800-282-0515 or file a complaint online at
    https://charitablecomplaint.ohioattorneygeneral.gov

    The entire family is a fraud. I bet Neil [email protected]$k and [email protected] Aaron as a kid and that why he has imaginative mind.

    11 Votes
  • Qw
    Qwack like a duck May 15, 2019

    @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! PayMaxx charged that Greenspan had "attempted to HACK" into its Web site. It said he had held back details of the alleged flaws and had requested that PayMaxx hire his company.

    "Due to the lack of specificity provided by Mr. Greenspan in his obvious sales pitch, PayMaxx did not view his communications as credible, " the company said. "Consequently, we declined his offer to hire his services."

    https://www.cnet.com/news/payroll-site-closes-on-security-worries/

    11 Votes
  • Ma
    Mary Chambers Jun 04, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @@plainsite.org It doesn't always work

    12 Votes
  • Hu
    Humpty Dumpty Wall Jun 18, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    This is false. Mark Zuckerberv lied and lead of Aaron Greenspan on. Mark Zuckerberg absolutely no way is founding father of Facebook. These post are as dumb as muc as the nicknames "Princely", "Zuck" and "Slayer". The media has given so much hype to Mark Zuckerberg. Mark stole Aaron Greenspan concept and design. Even worse, Zuckerberg started a "Libra" a direct copy of Winklevii Twins. Why why did the government shut down Facecash but allow Zuckerberg to establish Libra. Libra Is going to be the Bitcoin killer. Zuckerberg burnt Greenspan and Winklevii over. I'm positively sure any American would be very angry that Zuckerberg got away with heist. After all he does refer to everyone as dumb f$%@s.

    6 Votes
  • @CourtListener - Free Law Project Raw Whois Data
    Domain Name: PLAINSITE.ORG
    Registry Domain ID: D148521066-LROR
    Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
    Registrar URL: http://www.whois.godaddy.com
    Registry Expiry Date: 2020-07-09T08:14:23Z
    Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
    Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
    Registrar IANA ID: 146
    Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
    Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
    Reseller:
    Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
    Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
    Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
    Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
    Registrant Organization: Think Computer Corporation
    Registrant State/Province: California
    Registrant Country: US
    Name Server: KERMIT.THINKCOMPUTER.COM
    Name Server: ANIMAL.THINKCOMPUTER.COM
    DNSSEC: unsigned

    10 Votes
  • found myself on a google search filed bankruptcy 10 years ago after being laid off these scumbags have it all over there website . i worked 3 jobs and achived a 740 credit score have all my bills paid off mortgage up to date and these people have this old garbage of the worst time of my life out there for everyone to see . i am going to speak to a lawyer to have this removed . go to hell plainsite

    10 Votes
  • Me
    Metropolis Aug 12, 2019

    @Vladimir Putin Love They all suffer crime some form of mental illness. They should have been prohibited from having children knowing they are not playing with a full deck.

    8 Votes
  • @Out this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan! Becarful he has experienced in hacking:

    Payroll Website Still Not Secured
    Monty Solomon ([email protected])
    Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:44:27 -0500
    Review Index Sorted By: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
    Next message: Telecom dailyLead from USTA: "European Telecom Market Heats Up"
    Previous message: Monty Solomon: "Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds"
    TELECOM Digest: Home Page

    By Hiawatha Bray, Globe Staff | March 1, 2005
    Boston software entrepreneur Aaron Greenspan, who revealed serious
    security flaws in the website of Tennessee payroll company PayMaxx
    Inc. last week, said yesterday that the site remains insecure.
    Greenspan said that a computer hacker still could use the site to
    obtain the Social Security numbers of hundreds of Americans.
    Greenspan called the management of PayMaxx incompetent, and urged
    Congress to investigate the company. "They have no idea what they're
    doing, " he said.
    Greenspan's company, Think Computer Corp., had its payrolls prepared
    by PayMaxx, of Franklin, Tenn., until late last year. After ending
    their relationship, Greenspan found that his name, address, Social
    Security number, and other personal data were still available on the
    PayMaxx website, which could be accessed by entering zeroes in the
    site's login windows. Greenspan also found that he could obtain the
    same information about other PayMaxx customers by typing random
    numbers into the browser's address window. He estimated that up to
    100, 000 files could be accessed this way.
    http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2005/03/01/payroll_website_still_not_secured/
    [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: There are so many real idiots out there
    working on websites, etc. I am _hardly_ a brilliant web designer, but
    don't any of these fools know simple security measures they can take
    to thwart all but the most detirmined hackers? PAT]

    Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
    Go to Next message: Telecom dailyLead from USTA: "European Telecom Market Heats Up"
    Go to Previous message: Monty Solomon: "Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds"
    TELECOM Digest: Home Page

    7 Votes
  • Ke
    Kevin Edrei Nov 13, 2019

    @ThinkComputerCorporation X Auto
    Nonprofit involved in cyberbullying Tesla community is being funded by journalists, Elon Musk responds to the situation
    Iqtidar Ali
    1 month ago
    Elon Musk presenting at the 2017 Tesla Annual Shareholder Meeting
    Elon Musk presenting at the 2017 Tesla Annual Shareholder Meeting

    Author Photo: Iqtidar Ali
    by Iqtidar Ali | @IqtidarAlii

    Several Tesla fans and community members are reporting a Nonprofit organization named ‘PlainSite’ is either directly or indirectly involved in bullying or even threatening them for supporting Elon Musk’s vision and mission of a sustainable future.

    Active Tesla community members like Steve and Johnna (artist and writer for CleanTechnica) report that several Elon Musk and Tesla fans have been attacked by PlainSite or its founder/owner Aaron Greenspan.

    When steve pointed the followers to a Medium article published by an unknown Tesla fan detailing the bullying and doxxing activities of PlainSite and their accomplices, Elon Musk responded to this as ‘Super messed up situation!’.

    And still, @russ1mitchell from the @latimes supports that individual financially. 🤦🏻‍♀️ https://t.co/WXs3CcO6XD

    — Bark (@BarkMSmeagol) October 12, 2019
    Super messed up situation!

    — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 12, 2019
    [email protected], are you aware that one of your senior journalists (Russ Mitchell) is openly funding a fake charity run by an online bully?

    — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 12, 2019
    Elon Musk took action immediately and tagged the LA Times owner Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong in his next tweet to let him know the shady activities of one of his senior journalists, donating to a fake fund that is involved in bullying and attacking Tesla owners, enthusiasts, and fans.

    Omar Qazi is a software engineer and entrepreneur from California has been one of the prime targets of this organization’s attacks just because of his status as a Tesla community influencer and a Tesla car owner.

    PlainSite also publicly posted and entire email conversation between Elon Musk and Aaron Greenspan which includes asking Elon about the Tesla community influencers and accusing Elon of being a liar and a deceiver.

    Looks like PlainSite funded by a group of journalists who are TSLA shorts as well is constantly targeting Tesla community members from around the world, like Viv from Germany who makes great Tesla and SpaceX videos, she’s been harassed by this outlet for gaining the attention of Tesla CEO Elon Musk this year.

    Dear journalists: if you use Plainsite as your source, please know you’re siding w/ someone who’s been harassing multiple people, me included — only reason being their support of Tesla, & used their personal info for conspiracy theories — all while running a fraudulent charity ✌️

    — Viv 💉 (@flcnhvy) October 1, 2019
    Sure looks that way

    — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 13, 2019
    Looks like the smear campaign against Tesla and Elon Musk is a joint venture between the LA Times and PlainSite that is funded by the same journalists, recent LA Times posted an article about ‘Smart Summon’ that spreads fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), calling it a ‘glitchy science experiment (link not included intentionally to not give traffic to this Clickbait fluff).

    The other Tesla community members and influencers at the target of PlainSite are but not limited to Earl of Frunkpuppy (@28delayslater) and Musk AF (@AfMusk) — but the active Tesla community is going to fight FUD till the end, like Tesla Owners Silicon Valley worked with USA Today on a positive Smart Summon article.

    https://t.co/QU5fKUNUF1

    — Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV) October 13, 2019
    Howevre, the TSLAQ and the gang is also targeting website comments sections of Teslarati, CleanTechnica, InsideEVs, and ours, accusing the auto jounalists and authors of these sites to be on Tesla payroll, that’s a big lie.

    Recently one of the top Norwegian TV show gave Tesla kind of Free promotion, should they also be accused of being paid by Tesla to do so, certainly not, these accusers don’t understand emotion, mission and passion for sure so they only see things from the perspective of profit and money, this is what they worship.

    Yep, they're all over the place, commenting on our website that these articles are 'Paid by Tesla' 😂 pic.twitter.com/Rf8gctoijK

    — X Auto - EV, Tesla News (@XAutoWorld100) September 29, 2019
    How To Fight Back
    A nonprofit charity should not be online bullying people, but they are. And they are financially supported by members of the media, who often criticize Elon Musk and help Tesla Q in their stock manipulation fraud. We can’t prove this, but if it looks like shit, smells like shit, it is most likely shit.

    However, we can fight back. All nonprofit organizations are regulated by the IRS. It’s really easy to report this one and you do not have to be a U.S. Citizen to report this fraudulent charity to the IRS.

    Download this form from the IRS.

    Fill it out. You can do this anonymously and be sure to check the box saying that you want to protect your identity.
    Email it to [email protected]

    Be sure to use the name of the nonprofit: Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation. PlainSite is just their ‘project’. (Further Read: NonProfit PlainSite Attacks People Online)

    Follow us on Google News

    Elon Musk flew to Germany amidst Starlink launch, Gigafactory 4 announcement coming soon
    Elon Musk took a...

    Tesla Model 3 steals the crown of ‘the most efficient EV’ from Hyundai Ioniq
    Tesla Model 3 no...

    Watch Tesla Autopilot / Smart Summon handle construction zone and traffic cones
    The latest video...

    Mustang GT struggles to catch up even a basic Tesla Model 3 SR+ in a random street race challenge
    A Tesla Model 3 ...

    Categories: News, Tesla
    Tags: Elon Musk, Tesla News
    Leave a Comment
    X Auto
    Powered by WordPress

    Back to top

    2 Votes
  • Ra
    randy123789 Mar 08, 2018

    This incoherent, barely literate, rambling rant is brought to you by Diego Mas Marques, who has also gone by the name Diego Mas Howard and Rick Mas Marques. He is posting these completely false and defamatory statements around the Internet because he is unhappy about websites that have made public record court files available online. What kind of court records? Records regarding his repatriation to the United States after being convicted of murder and burglary in Spain. He was convicted of murdering his girlfriend. He is upset that people will find out that Diego Mas Marques, who also goes by the name Rick Mas Marques or Ricky Mas Marques (or Rick MasMarques or Ricky MasMarques or Diego MasMarques), killed someone and engaged in burglary, was convicted of both, and served prison time for doing so.

    You can read about his conviction for murder and burglary by visiting the following web pages (in Spanish):
    https://ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2000/07/18/902253/diego-mas-howard-yo-no-mate-a-tatiana.html
    https://ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2000/07/22/901607/condenado-el-hombre-que-golpeo-a-su-ex-novia-tras-entrar-en-su-casa-1.html
    https://ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/1999/12/18/934939/el-acusado-del-crimen-de-son-caliu-sera-juzgado-por-homicidio-y-malos-tratos.html
    https://ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2000/07/27/900869/condenado-a-15-anos-el-hombre-que-mato-a-su-ex-companera-en-son-caliu.html
    https://ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2000/07/19/902063/tatiana-vassic-comunico-a-la-policia-que-su-ex-novio-la-estaba-acosando.html

    You can view the court records on Diego Mas Howard (Diego Mas Marques, Rick Mas Marques, Ricky Mas Marques, Ricky Mas) by visiting these links:
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4585808/7/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4585808/5/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4585808/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4611827/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5134637/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4620039/in-re-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4585810/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6263133/united-states-v-masmarques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4606638/united-states-v-mas-marques/
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4573450/marques-v-commissioner-of-social-security/

    -16 Votes
  • Jo
    Johnny be Good Los Gatos Dec 16, 2018

    @randy123789 The above insanity was written by Aaron Greenspan.

    19 Votes
  • Fo
    For the love of Tesla Apr 03, 2019

    @randy123789 Aaron Greenspan is responsible for writing this rambling insane rant above and has been harassing and stalking the Free Law Project for a couple of years now. Aaron Greenspan has hacked into the Social Media accounts of many followers of the Free Law Project and is now suing the Free Law Project to try and get his $5, 000 donation back.
    Why is this guy not placed in a mental institution? Aaron Greenspan is out of control harassing so many people.

    13 Votes
  • Lo
    Lock up the crazies Apr 18, 2019

    @For the love of Tesla The above insane rambling and insane ranting using the user name randy123789 was posted by this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan who harasses and stalks people and uses shaming methods to try and get people to submit to his craziness and to believe his lies. How is it possible that in the USA a guy like Aaron Greenspan is allowed to roam free after harassing, shaming and extorting the public?

    14 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas Coleman Southern Cal May 24, 2019

    @Lock up the crazies The above was written by the mental patient Aaron Greenspan who refuses to stop stalking people that file complaints against him. Most likely he needs to be on some type of Psych Meds to make sure he is stable.

    17 Votes
  • Ca
    Caroline O Mar 12, 2018

    We are not associated by the sick vindictive individual or individuals who have posted this comment under our review of Aaron Jacob Greenspan.

    We are 6 individuals who have been directly affected by Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his sick father Neil S Greenspan who is the VP and Treasurer for plainsite.org.

    Currently plainsite.org is undergoing an investigation by the IRS non-profit division in Dallas, Texas. Also, since we have submitted complaints with the FBI's IC3 about Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his father Neil S Greenspan we will now introduce in to our next complaint the sick individual who is posting comments about some guy that has nothing to do with our complaints against plainsite.org. It doesn't matter if a fake name or a VPN was used by whoever wrote this nonsense about some guy from Spain and this is just over the top and completely defamatory. We are sure Google is going to investigate this copyright infringement and harassment towards whoever this guy is.

    We as a team of people from varied states have teamed up together and filed consecutive complaints with the IRS' non-profit division. We have had one site closed down already with the help of the IRS. Now out goal is to shut down plainsite.org, which is in the middle of an IRS investigation and next will be courtlistener.com who also have had an IRS complaints lodged against them last Fall of 2017.

    31 Votes
  • We
    We don't like TRAITORS! Mar 14, 2018

    Lots of people hating on each other. Looks like the people posting that about some guy from Spain could well be some of his [censor] relatives who called the media in Spain telling them all kinds of made up lies and made repeated calls to well they know what they did. That's what [censor] do when people are down, they kick them when there down.

    17 Votes
  • Ag
    A.Greenspan go back to Ohio Mar 23, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is going around on the internet claiming that he is the real owner of facebook and he has written online that Mark Zuckerberg is a complete sociopath. Now Aaron Greenspan has already sued facebook to get his hands on some free money, he settled out of court of course. Mark Zuckerberg should have taken this all the way to trial.

    Today we Aaron Greenspan running around still complaining and whining about what could of or should have been because little baby Aaron Jacob Greenspan could not get his hands on facebook.

    Can anyone imagine what the world would be like if Aaron Greenspan owned and operated facebook or facecash? That would be the end of the world as he would terrorize the entire world population with that type of power.

    Aaron Greenspan should never be allowed to go anywhere near the internet, a computer, smart device or anything else that would allow this guy to access people's personal information.

    Aaron Greenspan is a Hacker and a Danger to society.

    24 Votes
  • Ag
    A.Greenspan go back to Ohio Mar 23, 2018

    I am one of the thousands of victims by this anti-social person named Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his father Neil S Greenspan who is the VP and Treasurer for plainsite.org and fraudulent umbrella 501c Think Computer.

    A couple of years ago I asked this b"""""d to remove a case about the abuse that I had endured with my husband and had asked the court in Indiana to keep my address under Seal. Well, go figure this Hacker Aaron Greenspan went in to the court computer systems and somehow hacked in to the database and got hold of my information and published this on his plainsite.org.

    As a result my ex-husband located me and I lost my job and more. I had to move back in with my parents because of this self centered "a"""""e.

    Aaron Greenspan is not mentally right and he has no conscious, no morals, no ethics and only cares about himself making some money and gaining power and control over people. Everything all these people have said about Aaron Greenspan being a sociopath are right on the money.

    Don't know why the government doesn't shut this criminal down.

    The following is an article by Aaron Greenspan and he pretty much explains how he is hacking in to the Federal Pacer system and practically not paying for anything but now is charging the public a $99 a month fee to access legal cases on plainsite.org that he downloads for next to nothing.

    Make no mistake Aaron Greenspan is a bad person, Hacker and CRIMINAL!

    AARON GREENSPAN WRITING

    Introducing Operation Asymptote
    A suggested method for downloading the rest of PACER.
    January 16, 2013
    Topics = { Ø }
    Today I spent $46.90 to find out the answer to a question. I wanted to know how many cases Assistant United States
    Attorney Stephen P. Heymann has prosecuted in the District of Massachusetts during his entire career. I also wanted to know what those cases were about, who the parties involved were, which judges presided over them, and what happened in each of them. There were 73 cases I could find. So, to discover this public information about a public servant nominally protecting the public, it cost me (actually, it cost Think Computer Foundation) $46.90—and that's without downloading any of the actual case documents. Those would have cost hundreds more.
    It did not cost $46.90 because providing that information required the United States Government to burn $46.90 in coal to
    power giant computers; use $46.90 of long distance telephone time to transmit data at 1200bps; or compensate a kid on a
    bike for 4.69 hours of pedaling at $10.00 per hour. It cost that amount because some bureaucrat and/or panel of judges in theAdministrative Office of the United States Courts arbitrarily decided that it should. And they arbitrarily decided it should because they were looking at a graph with a lot of red ink, and they decided that must mean that Congress underfunds the courts (which I'm willing to admit it might). But then they further decided that such underfunding of the courts gives them a license to do anything they please, such as steal, to cover the shortfall—or maybe to cover the shortfall, and then some, where "some" is, you know, about $100, 000, 000.00 per year.
    So, in effect, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts stole $46.90 of my money today. They might as well have walked into my house and took a few twenties off of my nightstand. They took that money because they have a budget issue to deal with and they also happen to know something that I want to know, but that they are not allowed to profit from by law.
    And they know all about that law because they are the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
    While I generally see the stealing of my money as a problem, it's personal now. Stephen P. Heymann played a very active
    role in the entirely unnecessary death of Aaron Swartz, who I liked and respected very much. In turn, I would very much like to educate Mr. Heymann, his colleagues at the United States Department of Justice, and his colleagues at the Administrative Office of the United States Courts about what Aaron could see that they most certainly could not: their own future.
    The future is going to look a lot different at each of those institutions, and it's going to look a lot more like Aaron's vision of it than one they might choose for themselves. That's because aside from the fact that Aaron's vision matches the ideals of the founders of this country, I'm going to make it my personal mission to see it come to light. But I'm not stopping with the technology grants. At the very least, I want every U.S. Attorney and AUSA's full career as a prosecutor available to the public to examine in its entirety. Because what's even scarier than an abusive prosector is an abusive prosecutor who becomes a judge. (And guess what many of our judges did before they were judges?)
    Aaron saw a future where the justice system was transparent. So let's start with Heymann. When information is transparent, it's much easier to make informed decisions, such as whether or not an Assistant United States Attorney might have abused his prosecutorial discretion earlier in his career. Regardless of whether or not any one AUSA has, as an official representative
    of the United States of America in a decidedly non-clandestine role, what that person does in a professional capacity should be subject to public scrutiny every bit as much as what the Attorney General does, especially given that unlike many government employees, an AUSA has the power to unilaterally destroy a life, as Aaron so visibly proved.
    Aaron also could see the flaws in systems on a larger scale. I never talked to him about this particular flaw, but I'm pretty sure he would find it of interest now. Because as it is currently designed, PACER has a pretty big flaw.
    I'm not talking about a technical flaw. It's the same kind of system design flaw that allowed Aaron to download about a fifth of PACER's contents in 2008. The courts are forced (by Congress) to grudingly acknowledge that not everyone is rich enough to afford a lawyer, so in very limited circumstances, it is legal to use PACER for free.
    This is why I am introducing Operation Asymptote: an initiative to take full advantage of those very circumstances.
    Participating requires the following:
    1. You must have five minutes.
    2. You must have a valid credit or debit card, even though it will not be charged.
    3. You must have a computer with internet access that can run Firefox.
    4. You must have a PACER account.
    5. You must have the free RECAP browser extension.
    Once you've done all that, you can use the free Operation Asymptote tool on PlainSite to help you figure out what to
    download, and so long as you download no more than $15.00 worth of PACER materials per calendar quarter, your card will not be charged. That's it.
    Of course, the courts won't be happy about it. PACER's home page for many districts is a wall of frightening disclaimers, one of which is about using RECAP as a "fee-exempt" user. Don't be fooled.
    As far as I can tell as a non-lawyer who, for the record, is not providing anyone with legal advice by discussing any of this (if
    you have questions or doubts, talk to a lawyer), the court must provide information on its activities (other than those under seal) to the public, and it cannot discriminate against any portion of the public when providing that information. That means the court can't say, "if you have blue eyes, you are not authorized to access our public information." Nor can it restrict how public information is used or redistributed after it has been obtained. So, for example, the court also can't say, "if you are going to a town hall meeting after this, you can't have our public information—but going to a school to study it is okay."
    By stating, "Therefore, fee exempt PACER users must refrain from the use of RECAP. The prohibition on transfer of
    information received without fee is not intended to bar a quote or reference to information received as a result of a fee
    exemption in a scholarly or other similar work, " that is exactly what the court is doing, and it's probably against the law. Of course, that's no surprise, because this whole situation is against the law.
    The disclaimer is flawed in other ways, as well. It's not clear who "fee-exempt PACER users" even are because users do not
    know ahead of time whether they will or will not be fee-exempt. Exemption depends on usage. Users who just go over the
    $15.00 threshold by a penny are not required to somehow "return" $15.00 worth of data.
    In addition, while the scary disclaimer states, "Any transfer of data obtained as the result of a fee exemption is prohibited
    unless expressly authorized by the court, " the PACER home page clearly states, "By Judicial Conference policy, if your usage does not exceed $15 in a quarter, fees for that quarter are waived, effectively making the service free for most users, " which means that data transfer as the result of a fee exemption is expressly authorized by the court!
    Does this make any sense in the first place as a program designed to help impoverished litigants? Of course not. Only those who are lawyers or somehow involved in litigation sign up for PACER, and those people can easily hit $15.00 of usage almost immediately. Poor people caught up in the court system frequently don't have credit and debit cards. They also often don't have computers or the skills to use them, and they certainly are not about to master the absurd user interface that is PACER to do legal research if they do.
    I've already sent the courts (and my Congresswoman) a very polite letter, and they've already explained why they plan to
    ignore it. I could write letters all day, but I don't think they're listening. So join me in sending the courts a different kind of
    message. They want to play a game with taxpayers (by taxing us twice and threatening us into submission), so let's play. No laws need be broken. Just follow the directions, and we'll get that other 80% of PACER sooner than you think. And it literally won't cost a dime.
    7, 384 Views
    Add your comment in the box below.
    Name*
    E-Mail*
    Web Site
    Comment*
    What is the total when you put 8 and 4 together and add one hundred?
    *
    1 Brandon Anzaldi (http://brandonanzaldi.com)
    January 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM EST
    I think this is a brilliant idea. Finish what Aaron started. He deserves something in his memory. It won't bring him back, but it will
    bring some of his ideas to life.
    2 John Hawkinson
    January 20, 2013 at 10:03 AM EST
    "Fee-exempt" PACER users are not people who use less than $15/month. That is not what it is about. Fee-exempt PACER users
    are those who have petitioned a particular court for free access to that Court "to avoid an unreasonable burden and promote public access to such information." See http://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/psc/hfaq.html#GP18.
    While it's not super-clear under what circumstances such a fee exemption is granted (perhaps if you are a pro se litigant who is indigent, or maybe if you are a news reporter covering a case with voluminous filings), I believe it is clear that language does not apply to those who have not explicitly petitioned a specific Court for a fee waiver.
    3 Chris Field
    January 23, 2013 at 12:59 AM EST
    Though one should assess the risk for themselves, I ultimately concluded for myself that the PACER policies that restrict "fee exempt" users from transferring PACER data don't apply to "regular" users. For "regular" users, PACER's FAQ is unequivocal: "The information gathered from the PACER system is a matter of public record and may be reproduced without permission." [1]
    The Judicial Conference of the United States determines the PACER fees. Contrast the Judicial Conference references to a "fee waiver" available to all individual account holders [2], [3], [4] with references to a "fee exemption, " [5], [6] which the PACER FAQ clearly says can only be granted by a court after making the required findings upon motion by the party seeking fee exemption
    exemption. [7]
    **SOURCES**
    * [1], [7] from PACER Frequently Asked Questions at http://www.pacer.gov/psc/faq.html
    * [2]-[6] from Reports of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States at
    http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/JudicialConference/Proceedings.aspx
    [1] Pacer FAQ: "What are the acceptable uses of the data obtained from the PACER system?
    The PACER system provides electronic access to case information from federal courts across the United States. The information
    gathered from the PACER system is a matter of public record and may be reproduced without permission. However, the PACER user assumes all responsibility for consequences that arise from use of the data."
    [2] March 14, 2001: "no fee … [will] be owed until an individual … accrue[s] charges of more than $10 in a calendar year. …
    providing a basic level of public access consistent with the services historically provided by the courts."
    [3] March 16, 2010: "In order to encourage use of … PACER … by the public, … users [will] not be billed until their accounts
    total[s] at least $10 in a one-year period. To increase the amount of data available without charge … users [will] be allowed to
    accrue $10 in free usage quarterly, instead of yearly, before they [will] be charged."
    [4] September 13, 2011: "… the current waiver of fees of $10 or less in a quarterly billing cycle be changed to $15 or less per quarter so that 75 to 80 percent of all users would still receive fee waivers"
    [5] September 23, 2003: "exemptions to the fee are only to be given upon a showing of cause, are limited to specific categories of users, may be granted for a specific period of time, may be revoked at the discretion of the court, and are only for access related to the purpose for which the exemption was given."
    [6] March 15, 2011: "The Electronic Public Access (EPA) Fee Schedule provides for exemptions … upon a showing that an
    exemption is necessary to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote public access to information. … [T]he Conference
    approved, a modification of the EPA fee schedule to include the following sentence: 'For individual researchers, courts must also find that the defined research project is intended for academic research purposes, and not for commercial purposes or internet redistribution.'"
    [7] Pacer FAQ: "Can the user fees be waived?
    Exemptions from user fees are uncommon. A court may, for good cause, exempt persons or classes of persons from the
    electronic public access fees, in order to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote public access to such information. This language is intended to provide a mechanism by which a court may, upon appropriate demonstration of need, grant an exemption from fees for the use of electronic access to court data.
    The appropriate procedure by which a court may consider the grant of an exemption from the fee is upon motion by the party seeking exemption from the fee. The motion should demonstrate the basis upon which the party claims such exemption. The standards established by the Judicial Conference are: to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote public access to such information. A party must demonstrate that both standards have been met in order for a court to grant an exemption from payment of this fee.
    The exemption of PACER fees will only apply in the jurisdiction that issued the order. PACER usage in other courts will be subject to public access fees unless similar exemptions are granted in those jurisdictions as well."
    About | Writing | Technology
    Copyright © 2001-2017 Aaron Greenspan. All Rights Reserved.

    15 Votes
  • Mark Zuckerberg needs to file lawsuits against this nut Aaron Jacob Greenspan for continuously defaming Mark Zuckerberg on the web, by calling him all kinds of names, such as a "Thief", "Sociopath", "Liar", "Sneaky" and more.

    All of the names that Aaron Greenspan is calling Mark Zuckerberg is exactly what this Aaron Greenspan is.

    Aaron Greenspan claims that he was the founder of facebook and that Mark Zuckerberg stole his idea. Aaron Greenspan then sued Mark Zuckerberg with no evidence and because they were at Harvard at the same time, Aaron Greenspan has been making claim after claims that he is the true inventor of facebook? Aaron Greenspan has never invented anything. All Aaron Greenspan has done his entire life is "steal other people's ideas". Even today Aaron Greenspan even though told by many people not to do it went forward anyway with a website called plainsite.org, which essentially is the same exact thing as the Federal database Pacer. Major difference is that Aaron Greenspan is selective in what he downloads from Pacer, in order to make every attempt to drive more traffic to plainsite.org.
    Pacer does not go around throwing people's personal legal business on the web. Aaron Greenspan's plainsite.org is evil as he intentionally throws people's personal legal business on the web and in a highly selective manner opens the most detrimental files, so that he can get more people to look at his monetized website plainsite.org under his fraudulent umbrella 501c Think Computer.

    Now most recently Aaron Greenspan is attempting to get the naive public to spend $99 a month on a subscription and he will give 10% off if one pays a year in advance? The public needs to know the this is just one big criminal scam. People can go to Pacer and pay pennies on the dollar for the same documents and only be charged for what one needs. If people use this criminal website plainsite.org and we say criminal because Aaron Greenspan is continuously hacking in to State and Federal databases and people's email accounts and websites, in order to obtain Sealed documents, which is illegal. So, anyone who signs up with plainsite.org is essentially funding an ongoing criminal network owned by Aaron Greenspan.

    It is Aaron Greenspan who steals other people's ideas and then makes every attempt to make huge profits by over charging for something that is just about free to the public.

    The Attorney General of Californina, FBI, FTC, FCC and other State and Federal Agencies need to shut plainsite.org down and bring this criminal Aaron Greenspan to justice for the crimes he is committing against the public.

    Aaron Greenspan's father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer for plainsite.org and his mother Judith Keene Greenspan fully supports all of these criminal activities, so they can have some cash coming in at the expense of he public of course.

    Mark Zuckerberg wouldn't believe all the defamatory articles that Aaron Greenspan is writing about him all over the web and calling Mark Zuckerberg all kinds of vile insults.

    Nobody in the world should give Aaron Greenspan one single penny.. Make him go out and work with his hands for a living, that is justice.

    18 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan is a sub-human dirt b. I went through a nasty divorce and my ex=husband had abused me for some years. When I went to Court to finalize the divorce I, they put my address and records under Seal. Though, this Hacker and sub-human Aaron Greenspan somehow hacked in to the courts database and then uploaded my personal court documents on to his website plainsite.org.

    I repeatedly asked Aaron Greenspan to please remove my name, address and other personal information and if he could the entire case from online. His response was that of person with no conscious. He told me that he is like a Judge and on the internet can do whatever he feels like it, to whoever he feels like it because he said he has rights, that allow him to do these sub-human things to people. Everything I have read about this Aaron Greenspan is spot on. Aaron Greenspan is a true menace to society and completely out of his mind. His parents Neil S Greenspan and Judith Greenspan have to be out of their minds to because they brought this menace up to allow him to do bad things to the public for his personal enjoyment and pleasure. He is a. true SOCIOPATH. No doubt.

    My ex was able to locate me again because of Aaron Greenspan and I was then harassed by him to the point that I lost my job and almost lost custody to my two children. I had to move back in with my Mother to avoid any more issues with my ex. All of these problems were because of this sicko Aaron Greenspan who appears to enjoy ruining people.

    Now that I have read about complaints with those Federal Agencies, I too will be filing lots of complaints against Aaron Greenspan. This guy is a real danger and menace to the entire society.

    19 Votes
  • The public needs to file IRS Form 13909 501c complaint forms against Aaron Jacob Greenspan's terrorizing website plainsite.org.
    This IRS complaint Form 13909 501c can be found online and then one needs to send this form to the IRS office in Dallas, Texas, where they oversee fraudulent 501c's and tax frauds.

    Aaron Greenspan is an online Terrorist who terrorized the public with his monetized website plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c called Think Computer and his father Neil Sanford Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer for this abomination.

    There is no difference between a criminal and Aaron Greenspan, as he hides behind his computer screen ruining people's careers and reputations and then scamming the IRS and the public out of their money.

    Nobody should ever give Aaron Jacob Greenspan one single penny. Do not sign up for any of his $9.99 or $99.99 a month scam plans that are meant to just steal your money. People can just go to the Federal database Pacer and save themselves tons of money and pay pennies on the dollar and completely bypass this thief and liar Aaron Jacob Greenspan.

    Aaron Greenspan has set up plainsite.org as a cover for what he is really doing and that is "DATA MINING" the public's personal information that he uses and abuses. In other words this scam artist Aaron Greenspan dupes the public in to pain for his scam service that cost 1000% and more than just going to the Federal Pacer system and then he uses people's personal and credit information, in order to data mine and save people's personal information.

    Is Aaron Jacob Greenspan a dangerous individual? Extremely dangerous. The public is being fooled by Aaron Jacob Greenspan's real motives for having set up plainsite.org. He touts that he is trying to "help the public" find legal cases? That's jus a bunch of bs. That is just a pure lie by Aaron Jacob Greenspan.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan uses Hacking Methods, in order to go in to the Federal database Pacer and hack in to Sealed cases and documents that are not public and he does this selectively. Aaron Jacob Greenspan enjoys uploading in a selective manner only legal documents that attract the most attention and traffic to his criminal website plainsite.org, in order so that he can make every attempt to make some easy money without having to do real work.

    The public needs to work together to shut Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his father Neil Sanford Greenspan criminal extortion website plainsite.org down.

    We are 6 individual who will not give up and continue filing complaints with the IRS and other State and Federal Agencies non-stop until this evil sick individual removes all online cases from the web and stops destroying people's careers.

    12 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan is really angry at Mark Zuckerberg and he has lots of reasons to be furious. Mark Zuckerberg left Aaron Greenspan out of the loop when it came to facebook and got rid of Aaron Greenspan like when one gets rid of a tissue full of snot.

    Mark Zuckerberg screwed Aaron Greenspan over and laughed all the way to the Bank with his boat wife who really knew how to get Mark Zuckerberg under her thumb. As a matter of fact it was Mark Zuckerberg's current sneaky wife who manipulated him in to screwing everyone over who got in the way of his one man show money making with facebook.

    Today Aaron Greenspan has been left in the wind and is angry at the world for what Mark Zuckerberg did to him and as a consequence has taken that anger out at the public by going around and ruining people's careers with his vicious monetized website plainsite.org, when his true enemy is Mark Zuckerberg who stole all the fame and money.

    16 Votes
  • Le
    Leave the public alone! Mar 29, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is really angry at Mark Zuckerberg and he going off the deep end with personal attacks against Mark Zuckerberg and for good reason:
    Mark Zuckerberg has been committing IRS tax fraud for years and has been hiding his assets overseers, including in Singapore and Panama. Mark Zuckerberg has been data mining the public's information without their knowledge since day one. Mark Zuckerberg's sole intention was only to make lots of money and that's it, he didn't set up facebook as a Social Network platform and he personally thinks that anyone who signs up one facebook and posts and discuss their private business are simply f"""n stupid. Mark Zuckerberg thinks the public are a bunch of stupid fools, who. are naive and gullible to believe that this was "free". When is the public going to realize that nothing is for free and there are currently dozens of monetized websites out there that tell you they are there to "help" you, but its all about those website owners data mining your information for their personal greed and filling up their Bank accounts at your expense.

    Nobody should expose any of their personal information to any website and the public should close their facebook accounts, as your privacy is being viciously invaded even though Mark Zuckerberg will stand there and smile in your face and tell you that he is all of a sudden going to rectify a situation that he has known about since day one. After all it was Mark Zuckerberg who authorized these illegal invasion of privacy schemes using manipulative algorithms, in order to spy on the public, while people don't realize that facebook is not some fun and games site. Facebook is going after the public's personal data for their financial benefits and they have been archiving and saving every last detail of your private data so they can use it for Advertising companies.

    Aaron Greenspan is also data mining people's information with his monetized website plainsite.org and he needs to stop doing this to the public and allow people to remove URL's that are damaging to the public.

    Aaron Greenspan telling it like it is about Mark Zuckerberg on his Twitter feed:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZaPoh0UMAAy3KT.jpg:large
    What the media isn't talking about: Facebook is already in hot water for the way in which it structured its business to evade taxes. And the government would really like to see some more documents.
    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Follow Follow @AaronGreenspan
    More
    Listen. The problem is not this in Mark's statement or that in Mark's statement. THE PROBLEM IS MARK.
    1:21 PM - 21 Mar 2018

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 20
    More
    Mark Zuckerberg's strong and plainly false denial of Facebook's role in the 2016 election looks increasingly like an effort to deliberately mislead shareholders, which would be a violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. @SEC_Enforcement

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 20
    More
    There is a reason that the very first thing I posted on Hacker News was a warning to the community about Mark Zuckerberg, with a link to the book I had written largely about my time at Harvard. The most damning proof was found after the book was published. http://www.aarongreenspan.com/writing/20120919/the-lost-chapter/ …

    0 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
    Reply Retweet 2

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 19
    More
    Maybe, Mark. Maybe.

    0 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    Reply Retweet 1 Like 4

    PlainSite


    @PlainSite
    Mar 19
    More
    Some of the internal Facebook documents coming up in the United States action over tax evasion are pretty great. "MySpace, Friendster and etc. all died." And they didn't even defraud 50 million people! https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/304jmbv5l/california-northern-district-court/united-states-of-america-v-facebook-inc-and-subsidiaries/ …

    0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
    Reply Retweet 1 Like

    More
    Facebook is looking at a theoretical $2 trillion fine.

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 19
    More
    If you ever thought Mark Zuckerberg is a genius or a great CEO, it might be because his cronies helped write The Social Network. Here's Scott Rudin assuring his PR hack that "Mark is always the smartest, most shrewd, most visionary person in the room." (Mark loves hacks.)

    More
    According to our PlainSite Pro statistics based on available data, Facebook gets sued in federal court more often than it sues others. https://www.plainsite.org/profiles/facebook-inc/ …

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 17
    More
    What will it take for a newspaper to call on Mark (and Sheryl Sandberg and Andrew Bosworth, etc.) to resign or, better yet, face charges of gross negligence, if nothing else?

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 14
    More
    Aaron Greenspan Retweeted PlainSite
    If the SEC can charge Holmes, the SEC can charge Zuckerberg. Everything about Facebook is based on the false representations the company has made about monthly active users, numbers we now know were grossly overstated. Also, there's that Russia thing.Aaron Greenspan added,
    PlainSite

    @PlainSite
    Former Silicon Valley superstar Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes has just been charged by the SEC. https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/39wtya2i8/california-northern-district-court/securities--and-exchange-commission-v-holmes-et-al/ …
    1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
    Reply 1 Retweet 1 Like 1

    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 17
    More
    If especially popular students exported their profile data, they might have a thousand friends, whose e-mail addresses and birthdates were also exported. Back in 2005 or so when this was an issue, Mark's reaction was to deny the problem and its urgency. Same deal now.
    0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
    Reply Retweet 1 Like
    PlainSite Retweeted

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 17
    More
    Everyone seems upset about Cambridge Analytica, and rightfully so. The real question is what else don't we know about? It sounds exactly like the time I told Mark that he was leaving exported friend lists all over his server, and revealing the birthdates of everyone at Harvard.

    Aaron Greenspan


    @AaronGreenspan
    Mar 21
    More
    Mark, just now on CNN: "I'm used to when people legally certify that they're going to do something, they do it." That's odd: Mark legally certified that he and Facebook would publicize my settlement "consistent with company policy for press releases." That's not what happened.

    15 Votes
  • Le
    Leave the public alone! Mar 29, 2018

    How much money did Aaron Greenspan get out of Mark Zuckerberg? Make this public! The public has a right to know!

    plainsite.org also invades people's privacy! plainsite.org also has ongoing issues with the IRS for tax fraud with fraudulent 501c non-profit set ups for the website plainsite.org.

    Make all of plainsite.org's information transparent and totally open to the public, so people can judge for themselves if its a good or bad website.

    16 Votes
  • Fo
    For the love of Tesla Apr 03, 2019

    @Leave the public alone! 50 cents!

    17 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas Coleman Southern Cal May 24, 2019

    @Leave the public alone! sixty thousand dollars! Yes, sixty thousand dollars! That's $60, 000. Not millions but only thousands. Mark Zuckerberg is no fool.

    14 Votes
  • Me
    Metropolis Aug 12, 2019

    @Leave the public alone! He didn’t even get two cents. He lost his entire court case and he refused to undergo a Psychiatric Evsluation from a Court Psychiatrist. Case was closed and this lun received zero money. Don’t believe his lying narratives to try to fool the public that he made lots of Menes from lawsuits. It’s all a lie. He lives off his stalking website plainsite.org and he collects Social Security Disability payments for his mental illness.

    7 Votes
  • Aaron Jacob Greenspan the son of Neil Sanford Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan is a Pedophile and has criminal charges pending in Florida and California.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan claims his vicious website plainsite.org is a harmless transparent website that allows the public to access legal information at no costs. That's all a complete lie.

    Aaron Greenspan dives in to the Federal database Pacer and downloads for next to nothing the public's personal legal information that he feels will attract the most attention to his monetized website plainsite.org under a fraudulent 501c in which his father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer. This Pedophile Aaron Greenspan fully enjoys ruining the careers and reputations of thousands of Americans so he can sit back behind his computer and make a nice cushy living by data mining the public's legal information to make easy money of course.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a dangerous Sociopath and a Pedophile who stubbornly cannot leave the public alone with his intrusive monetized website plainsite.org.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan should not be allowed to go anywhere near the public's personal data, as he Terrorizes, Harasses, Stalks and Threatens people of his choosing.

    18 Votes
  • Ju
    Judith Greenspan Crazy Ho Mar 30, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is an angry individual as Mark Zuckerberg though him to the side like a piece of toilet paper that someone just used to wipe their [censor].

    Now Aaron Jacob Greenspan has been left with his website plainsite.org that he uses to the terrorize, harass, threaten, stalk and bully the public because he is a little coward who will not be transparent and show the people affected by his website plainsite.org his true physical address because he knows he is doing many evil things to Americans for his pleasure and profit.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan hides the fact that he is a convicted Pedophile.

    22 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron Greenspan is evil Mar 31, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is a pure evil sneak who enjoys ruining the public's careers for his selfish money making.

    He is extremely sick in the head.

    plainsite.org=pure evil

    19 Votes
  • Aaron Jacob Greenspan wants to access the Federal database Pacer for free, so that this user can then sell all this information on his monetized website plainstie.org (under current IRS investigation for tax evasion) to what he calls the "dumb public" for a really high price and make himself a comfy living off the backs of other other people. He's a Jacker and a parasite on the backs of society.

    Think Computer Foundation Sues U.S. Courts over PACER Fees and "Access to Justice"(plainsite.org)
    submitted 3 years ago by thinkcomp to r/law
    59 commentsshare
    close
    giraffe_taxi • 2 points • submitted 3 years ago
    /r/thinkcomp I took a bit more time looking into this, skimmed through the complaint and enough of your user history to see the personal connection.
    I believe your suit will fail, quickly. Since I empathize with part of your goal (access to justice), here are some comments that are intended to be constructive. It is critical, but I'm not trying to personally offend anyone here.
    The complaint reads like a self-aggrandizing rant. In paragraphs 33-37, you allege that PACER is directly responsible for Aaron Schwartz's suicide. Points 27 and 28 could be paraphrased as "PACER could be done at a fraction of this price, and by happy coincidence my company is intended to replace PACER."
    And oh, by the by, your company has been unprofitable, allegedly due to PACER, attorney fees, and related court rules... and you just happen to think that PACER and court rules requiring attorneys are unconstitutional. Do you see how, framed this way, your complaints seem like those of a failed businessman who is blaming the system for a failed business endeavor?
    To put it mildly, your self-interest as described in the brief undermines the credibility of your allegations.
    A large bulk of your complaint is dedicated to your opinion that corporations should be able to file civil complaints pro se. However, I am afraid that your brief reads like just the kind of pro se complaint that wastes courts' time. IOW your complaint about restrictions on pro se litigants is itself an example of why there are restrictions on pro se litigants.
    Setting aside for a moment the underlying complaints, the brief is a mess. Take a red pen. Mark every instance of "upon information and belief, " replace that phrase with "I am just pulling this out of my ass, " and you will have precisely described the authority of each claim that you've supported with that terrible phrase. Just get rid of each of those related paragraphs outright; they lend no support.
    What my legal writing prof taught me was that you need authoritative source material to back up every assertion of law and every assertion of fact. This means that almost every sentence should have at least one supporting citation, preferably multiple ones. When you come across conflicting sources, rather than cherrypicking only the supporting material and leaving the contradictory stuff out, directly address the contradictions.
    For example in point 64 you assert a fact, then say its supporting documentation is "far too extensive to document here." (Hint: no, it isn't. The lawsuit is the time for you to extensively document your allegations & complaints.)
    As a final criticism, you seem to make the common amateur error of trying to throw in everything as well as the kitchen sink. Consequently, the complaint is poorly targeted. The only common link between your complaints about PACER fees, your complaints about court rules, and your complaints about corporations not being able to file pro se appears to be that these things have cost you money, and you don't like it.
    In short, that complaint is going to get you nowhere. Start over. Support every discrete assertion of fact with credible, disinterested documentation. Support every assertion of law with a citation, preferably one to primary law. Directly address citations that would seem to counter your assertions.
    Hope that wasn't too painful.
    thinkcomp • 1 point • submitted 3 years ago

    14 Votes
  • Ru
    Ruth Bloom Apr 03, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan created a fraudulent 501c non-profit called "Think Computer Foundation", filing type "Corporation for non-profit" on October 26, 2000 with entity number 1189731, after it was already a "for profit", that originally was started up in Cleveland, Ohio on April 29, 1998 with entity number 1000499 and called "Think Computer Corporation" under a filing type of "Corporation for profit".

    The public can clearly see that the parents of Aaron Greenspan, his father Neil Sanford Greenspan who works at Case Western University in Cleveland, Ohio and his mother Judith Keene Greenspan have been and are directly involved in this scam from day one. As a matter of fact it looks like Aaron Greenspan's father Neil Sanford Greenspan initiated this entire non-profit scam, so that his son Aaron Greenspan most likely could have some sort of income, as otherwise who would hire this guy.

    What happened next after Aaron Greenspan along with his parents Neil Sanford Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan transferred this entire fraudulent 501c that everyone can see was set up, in order to "help the children", that's laughable, and was transferred out of Ohio to the State of Delaware, so in this way they would not have to disclose their monetized websites that they own and operate. By the way everything that Aaron Greenspan and his parents Neil S Greenspan and mother Judith Keene Greenspan is always for "PROFIT". These individuals are not out to help anyone but themselves to make some easy money with their many monetized websites.

    Aaron Greenspan owns and runs plainsite.org, which is extremely harmful to the public and thousands of Americans are losing their jobs, reputations and livelihoods, because of these criminals being allowed to continue this criminal enterprise.

    The public needs to start filing massive amounts of complaints against these three above mentioned individuals, with the Attorney General's Offices in Ohio and Delaware, IRS and other State and Federal Agencies.

    We have so many documents at this point proving without a doubt that Aaron Greenspan's monetized website under his fraudulent 501c called Think Computer is all one big scam, in order to avoid paying taxes to the US Government and the States from where he is operating out of.

    18 Votes
  • Al
    Alicia Moreno Apr 06, 2018

    Ladies and Gentlemen here is the undeniable proof that Aaron Greenspan's plainsite.org under Think Computer Corporation/Foundation is a complete scam. He set all of this up with his parents Neil S Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan who are directly involved from day 1 with this criminal enterprise, that the set up "To help the children". Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
    What they meant to say when these money grubbing criminals set up this criminal enterprise was, "To help themselves" to some money. They just want some easy money, without having to lift a finger and don't like to do real work. They don't do any work where they get their hands dirty.

    Aaron Greenspan does not like being exposed and when he is exposed publicly as a criminal, he then viciously threatens, harasses, stalks, insults, defames and uses all kinds of Bullying tactics because in his insane mind he is always right and he thinks he can do whatever he wants but he doesn't like it when the public outs his criminal organization.

    On December 24, 2009 Aaron Greenspan set up Think Computer as a Stock Corporation in Delaware, so he has Delusions of Grandeur to one day first steal money with criminal websites, then attempt to go on the Stock Exchange with an IPO, in order to rip he public off even more and laugh all the way to the bank, without ever having to do any real work.

    19 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron Greenspan=CRIMINAL Apr 08, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is an online Stalker and Terrorist. Anyone who out's this insane nut as a fraud with his fraudulent 501c Think Computer/Foundation will Threatened, Stalked, Harassed, Bullied and this criminal will contact his/her work place and others, in order to Terrorize and ruin a people's careers and reputations. This individual is mentally very sick in the head and the authorities need to lock this guy up and keep him away from computers, smart devices and especially the public's private information that he Trolls for fun so he can make money being a social pariah.

    This individual does not want to do any work and he enjoys having his hands nice and clean, while he simply taps on his computer keyboard stalking and harassing people online.

    The public needs to file IRS Referral Form 13909 against this individual for Tax Evasion and an ongoing organized criminal enterprise.

    We need to get more and more people together so that we can file a Class Action Lawsuit against Aaron Jacob Greenspan his father Neil S Greenspan and his mother Judith Keene Greenspan for emotional distress, ruining careers and reputations, Harassment, Terrorizing people, Bullying people, infringing on the public's privacy and civil rights, using the Internet to continuously stalk people and download their information from Pacer, accessing Sealed legal documents by methods of Hacking into databases, setting up a fraudulent 501c under the guise of "Helping the children" when this is a fraud, as he only helps himself to the money, including his parents Neil S Greenspan and Judith Keene Greenspan.

    These mentioned individuals are big time criminals disguising themselves as "do-gooders" but they are manipulative compulsive lying scam artists.

    20 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan enjoys posting people personal information online to defame and shame them. This is how this nut gets his kicks, while he makes money with his fraudulent 501c plainsite.org under Think Computer/Foundation.

    Post comments here so we can get as many people as possible to move forward with a Class Actions Lawsuit against Aaron Greenspan.

    19 Votes
  • Ka
    KarW Apr 11, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    I'd like to move forward with a class action. My private information was published without my consent or knowledge.

    19 Votes
  • Ka
    KarW Apr 11, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Everyone should report the violation to: https://oag.ca.gov/contact/consumer-complaint-against-business-or-company

    20 Votes
  • Cl
    Classaction Lawsuit Apr 15, 2018

    Hi everyone!

    We are going to file a Class Action Lawsuit against Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his many companies where he is committing all kinds of tax frauds against the US Government.

    Everyone here is the email to send us correspondence to start this Class Action Lawsuit ASAP!

    [email protected]

    What we recently found out is that Aaron Jacob Greenspan has been buying up Trademark names from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The reason why he does this is to hoard these Trademark so that when a legitimate company that actually produces something in the US economy comes along this individual then does not let the Trademark name go to a new start up company that need it unless he extorts a large amount of money out of a new start up company that needs a specific trademark name that Aaron Jacob Greenspan has hoarded so he can exploit the situation for his financial greed.

    Again, the following is the email address that I would like everyone to respond to, in order so that we can get this Class Action Lawsuit underway as soon as possible:

    [email protected]

    The public needs to start filing FBI IC3 "Internet Criminal Division" complaints against Aaron Jacob Greenspan. This way the people will have a paper trail of how Aaron Jacob Greenspan has shamed and defamed them online for his personal greed.

    Complaints can also be lodged against Aaron Jacob Greenspan online as well with the FTC "Federal Trade Commission", FCC "Federal Communications Commission", California Attorney General's Office.

    If anyone has been seriously hurt by Aaron Jacob Greenspan where they have lost their employment and if he has ruined a person's reputation just so that he can make some money with your personal data, the go to your local Courts and talk to your local District Attorney's and ask how to move forward with a whole array of civil and criminal charges against Aaron Jacob Greenspan. Don't be shy about it! This is your life that Aaron Jacob Greenspan is ruining!

    We are finding out information that Aaron Jacob Greenspan is the person who has set up another vicious website called "leagle.com" that has a completely made up name on ICANN WHOIS and the address in Little Rock, Arkansas is all made up.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan transferred this fraudulent 501c non-profit to the State of Delaware so that he could hide al his vicious monetized websites that are all under his fraudulent 501c Think Computer & Think Foundation.
    Delaware and Nevada are the only two States in the US that allow a person to stay anonymous and does not have to file yearly income statements. You can just imagine all the money this individual is making and evading taxes to the IRS in a big way.

    People can see the document on how Aaron Jacob Greenspan set up this Think Foundation with the guise of "helping the children". This guy is just a low life, liar and manipulator.

    Contact us: [email protected]

    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments
    Comments

    19 Votes
  • Cl
    Class Action Lawsuit! Apr 15, 2018

    Everyone! We are moving forward with a Class Action Lawsuit against Aaron Jacob Greenspan. If you have been shamed, defamed, harassed, stalked, bullied, terrorized, threatened, had your employer, friends, family, acquaintances, neighbors, place of residence or anyone you know has on top of Aaron Greenspan online harassment been contacted in any way by this individual for purposes to ruin your employment and reputation, then contact us at the following email:

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    18 Votes
  • contact the following email so we can add more people to our class action lawsuit:

    [email protected]

    16 Votes
  • Aa
    AaChi Apr 25, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    the entire family is sick. here is an article of the other greenspan phyco crying over a lost camera meanwhile the ugly jew dork is destroying the life of many people. ugly pic is judy greenspan . judie greenspan has a face of an 90 year old man's [censored].

    HTTP://WWW.toledoblade.com/local/2010/02/25/Every-picture-tells-a-story-but-man-s-precious-record-is-gone.html

    18 Votes
  • It looks like Aaron Greenspan himself is the one who is uploading pictures of his family and it looks like he is trying to set people with hiss sneaky manipulation and lying tactics

    12 Votes
  • Aaron Jacob Greenspan trying to get his way forcefully I might add with another online legal document Troll site called courtlistener.com. The guys are making a nice comfy living off the back of hard working men and women in American by dredging up people's dirty laundry or better stated legal documents under the guise of "helping people find documents".

    TIL: RECAP is PACER backwards.(reddit.com)
    submitted 8 days ago by FishingForCars to r/bestoflegaladvice
    close
    mlissner • 1 point • submitted 6 days ago
    I disagree with most of these points, but I'm not going to spend a ton of time responding one by one. I'd rather go do real work. Non-profits need to get money from somewhere, and I've yet to get my full salary after many years. If you want to continue this discussion, you can email me. I promise you, that's a more fruitful way to get what you want than writing blog posts, sending tweets, and showing up on reddit.
    thinkcomp • 1 point • submitted 6 days ago
    You're welcome to disagree. These are issues of public interest. Especially given the history here I prefer to discuss them in a public forum. Not only is opaque pricing ill-advised in the context of running a transparency non-profit, but you've also accused me—behind my back and in front of journalists—of pretending to be someone I have never pretended to be. If your salary really is an issue, slandering prior donors is not a good way to move forward. You have yet to apologize to me or to the real person somewhere in Canada—an actual RECAP user who deserves your respect—whom you maligned for offering constructive criticism that you wrongly later construed as "harassment."
    Moreover, you opened the door to this public discussion on Reddit (via a tweet) having updated your own Free Law Project website/blog numerous times concerning RECAP, while omitting key details of the changes you have made. Here I am, one of RECAP's biggest proponents, willing to discuss the issues. Now you're saying that you are unwilling to talk about these matters in public. This is difficult to understand.
    Here's the fundamental issue: you can't complain about sacrificing time and money when you run something called the Free Law Project. The reason there needs to be a Free Law Project is the specious argument that court staff sacrifice their time and money putting PDFs online, and therefore we all need to pay big fees to know what the law says. We don't. Many people, such as your predecessors, will gladly make sacrifices so that we don't. If you are unwilling or unable to do so, please move aside for someone who will.
    ___--__-_-__--___ • 2 points • submitted 6 days ago
    Here's the fundamental issue: you can't complain about sacrificing time and money when you run something called the Free Law Project.
    Your comments and attitude in this thread are so out of line. You just lost one paying PlainSite Pro customer.
    thinkcomp • 1 point • submitted 5 days ago
    If you have a better sustainable model in mind, I'd be

    10 Votes
  • Aaron Jacob Greenspan has been using the"Reddit.com" site to harass, stalk, threaten, shame and defame our families in a vicious manner. So, far Reddit.com has not taken down Aaron Jacob Greenspan's harassing and defamatory comments, while is leaving Reddit.com open to a Defamation Lawsuit.

    10 Votes
  • Da
    data mining websites May 24, 2018

    Another Trolling data mining website called radaris.com is based out of Newton, Massachusetts. The owner changed the address to a fake one in Cyprus using the Hosting Company's Privacy option to hide their real identity and real address.

    12 Votes
  • St
    Stop Insane Nuts! May 30, 2018

    If the public wants Aaron Jacob Greenspan to stop harassing, stalking and defaming them, then the only thing this insane individual understands is when the Courts and Law Enforcement get involved.

    First go to your local Police Station and file complaints for all this harassment, stalking and defaming.
    Take that Police Report to your local DA's Office and let them know that Aaron Jacob Greenspan is out of his mind and is continuously harassing, stalking and defaming you and that he is hurting your employment prospects and that you cannot find a job because of what this nut has done. Ask for a Restraining Order and Harassment Order. You can also start a Defamation Lawsuit very easily in some States. You can initiate all of this where Aaron Jacob Greenspan supposedly lives in those Courts as well, such as Palo Alto or the Court in San Jose and those cities have organizations to assist you with your Restraining Orders or you can do it all online in California free of charge and they will serve Aaron Jacob Greenspan these documents by way of an official in California. Just don't be shy about it and just do it, as it is your future that this nut is intentionally destroying.

    In addition complaints can be filed with the following:
    FBI IC3
    California Attorney General Office where Aaron Jacob Greenspan lives
    Delaware Attorney General Office where "Think Computer Corporation and Foundation are Incorporated"
    Ohio Attorney General Office where this entire tax fraud was initiated and schemed by Neil S Greenspan
    File IRS Referral Forms 13909 by going online and then fill this form out and the address is on there too in Dallas, Texas.
    File a complaint with the California eCrimes Unit. You can do this online and call them as well. They are already fully aware of Aaron Jacob Greenspan.
    People need to realize that this monster Aaron Jacob Greenspan has lots of other monetized websites such as leagle.com too and this site is under an "Agents" name, in order to hide his real identity and especially the identity of Neil S Greenspan from the public. leagle.com is another vicious monetized website that is destroying people's careers and reputations.
    Contact Senators from the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, such as Diane Feinstein from California or Senator Kennedy from Louisiana. Senator Coons from Delaware is also on the Judiciary Committee. Most Senators on the Judiciary Committee should have a Dossier on Aaron Jacob Greenspan and have documented proof of all the harm that this nut is doing to people as he intentionally hurts people's careers and reputations.
    We believe that this insane individual should not be allowed to go anywhere a computer and never be allowed to access the public's personal and private information. This individual cannot hold down a regular job so he has to make money this way by being a leach on society and destroying people's careers and reputations so he can make money with his monetized websites.

    This individual appears to know how to play the victim game when its convenient for him and he tries and use different email addresses and other things to try and fool the public in to believing that he has some credibility when he has none at all. Basically this individual is sick in the head and indulges himself by gaining access to the public's personal information for profit.

    Lastly what everyone needs to know is that at the same time Aaron Jacob Greenspan has website since 2012 that is dedicated to removing harmful URL's for fee of course. Do you see where we are going with this? Aaron Jacob Greenspan first intentionally ruins people's careers and reputations with his various monetized websites and then to make more money he has set up a big scam operation to remove these harmful URL's in conjunction with other reputation management companies and even some Lawyers as well.

    Its all about the money and kickbacks to make more money off of your personal and private information.

    12 Votes
  • Me
    Mercedes SUV Black Jun 01, 2018

    Apparently this insane nut Aaron Jacob Greenspan is posting comments on this site repeatedly to set people up. Aaron Jacob Greenspan is mentally off the the wall and suffers from a lighter form of Autism where he is barely functional in society. That’s why his father Neil S Greenspan set up this entire tax fraud schemes, in order to get some easy income for loney toon Aaron Jacob Greenspan. These individuals enjoy destroying people’s careeers and reputations with their many monetized websites such as leagle.com and plainsite.org. There is no difference between criminals and these parasites.

    13 Votes
  • Ex
    Expose 501(c)(3) Fraud Jun 05, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan owns and runs PDFSR.COM where he uploads documents to harass and stalk people.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan has one person working for him in Indonesia where supposedly PDFSR.COM is based with a fake address of course.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is outsourcing employees in India to do his dirty work with his monetized websites under this fraudulent 501c Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation.

    http://www.thinkcomputer.org/about/index.html

    http://www.thinkcomputer.org/home/photo1.jpg

    11 Votes
  • Ex
    Expose Tax Fraudsters Jun 06, 2018

    These individuals use all their ill gotten gains as "they see fit". In other words they are using all this money they receive by screwing over Americans all over the place by splurging it all on themselves and treating themselves to some really nice material things, while they destroy people's careers and reputations. On Judith Keene Greenspan's side she has someone "female" who is married to a Judge and have handed this information over to Law Enforcement, as this is a conflict of interest and is considered corruption to enable these monetized websites that are destroying people's lives.

    These sick individuals cannot leave people alone and do real work for a living. These individuals are social parasites who live off the backs of people's dirty laundry while they live it up as they destroy people's careers and reputations while they laugh all the way to the Banks.

    11 Votes
  • Ex
    Expose Tax Fraudsters Jun 06, 2018

    Wow! These nuts are literally lying to the IRS and US Government stating they have $0 earning when they take private advertising for all their monetized websites such as leagle.com and plainest.org.

    Oooh! Boooy! IRS Referral Forms 13909 here we come!

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan and his father Neil S Greenspan just cannot stop harassing and stalking people so they can make their dirty money by wrecking people's careers and reputations. There is no difference between a career criminal and these individuals. Only difference is these individual are better liars, manipulators and scammers than most people. They know quite a lot when it comes to ripping off the IRS and committing perjury and setting people up.

    11 Votes
  • Aa
    AaChi Jun 08, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    seems that Judi Greenspan is using spectrumlorain.com to help fund her fake charity. The address and number for spectrum are 300 Broadway Lorain, Ohio 44052 (440) 654-4174. Seems that Keene Promotions is able to avoid paying taxes somehow. Think, PlainSite.org and Keene Promotions are all one big huge scam not to pay the IRS. Doesn't anyone really check to see if Think, PlainSite.org and Keene Promotions are really 501 C?

    Judi Keene Greenspan
    Think Computer Foundation
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    Phone: (216) 932-1989
    [email protected]

    Comments

    14 Votes
  • Aa
    AaChi Jun 08, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    better image.

    Judi Keene Greenspan
    Think Computer Foundation
    20560 Shelburne Road
    Shaker Heights, OH 44122
    Phone: (216) 932-1989
    [email protected]

    Comments

    13 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron Greenspan is a monster Jun 11, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    I was a victim of rape by my previous employer. I begged Aaron Greenspan to remove my name from Google search engine and he made threats that he would predominantly place my case on the front of the site and my case my public domain. I have gone on job interviews and they will ask me why I sued my previous employer. I have to relive the rape over and over. [censored] you Aaron Greenspan .

    14 Votes
  • 1s
    1st Amendment Right! Jun 21, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a dirty lying scoundrel who doesnt know what real work is. This individual has lied under Oath in fron if Judges, lied to the public ti scam money out of honest people. Lying is second nature this this Sociopath.

    This individual is eve writing up bad reviews on himself to try and set people up because he is insane.

    16 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas Coleman Southern Cal May 24, 2019

    @1st Amendment Right! We noticed that he is doing exactly what you stated. He is the one who is uploading derogatory comments and pictures on himself to set people up. Someone has now did several subpoenas on this guy about all these gripe sites and so far he is the one who owns and runs lots of these gripes sites under fake names but the subpoena proves he is behind this entire thing.

    10 Votes
  • Re
    Report Tax Fraudsters! Jun 24, 2018

    Dr. Neil S Greenspan concocted and masterminded this entire 501c Tax Fraud with this Think Computer Corporation, Think Computer Foundation and Thinklink, which he then transferred to the State of Delaware so he does not have to turn in a yearly earnings report to the IRS. Delaware and Nevada are the only States that do not require a yearly earnings report. This allows greater possibilities to defraud the IRS and US Government.

    Dr. Neil S Greenspan who is a Professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio is the actual VP and Treasurer for this entire Tax Fraud Scam and this individual is the real mastermind behind this entire criminal enterprise as he started this well before 1998, when his insane son Aaron Jacob Greenspan was only a little boy who could not possibly concoct all these Tax Fraud schemes as a 12 or 13 year old child. Dr. Neil S Greenspan has actually committed child abuse by sticking his son Aaron Jacob Greenspan in the middle of this criminal enterprise and placing him as the CEO and President, in order to cover his tracks and try and keep his squeaky clean reputation, as a Professor at the Case Western Reserve University.

    Also, Dr. Neil S Greenspan realizing that his son Aaron Jacob Greenspan has mental issues needed to find some sort of "Cash Cow" to fund his son's independence and at the same time to pay all the bills for his other son Simon Greenspan who is Autistic and needs lots of care, which means they need lots of money to pay for all of this.

    Only think is that Dr. Neil S Greenspan does not want hardly pay for any of his son's mental health costs out of his own pocket. Instead, this individual wants to use "OPM" other people's money that he gets access to in a fraudulent manner, in order to pay all bills and the extra goodies that they can afford with all the Tax Fraud Schemes they have going on.

    The American people, IRS, Federal and State Government in Ohio and California are being duped and conned by these individuals and these individuals owe tons of money in Federal and State Government Tax Revenues.

    These individuals should have their assets frozen, which would entail freezing all their Bank Accounts immediately and simultaneously freeing all their assets, including what is found and not found. We are sure that these individuals are hiding assets. Who knows they probably have cash and other things of value stashed off the grid.

    9 Votes
  • Re
    Report Tax Fraudsters! Jun 24, 2018

    The attached documents show the reason why Dr. Neil S Greenspan who is the VP and Treasurer and his insane son Aaron Jacob Greenspan put in place as the puppet President and CEO to do his father's dirty deeds have changed the entire Corporation to an "Unlicensed Foreign Corporation" on January 1, 2010 in the State of Delaware.

    What does this mean?

    This means that as of January 1, 2010 these criminals no longer have to turn in any yearly earnings reports and can illegally hide all their ill gained assets. Notice how Dr. Neil S Greenspan masterminded all of this criminal activity.

    First Dr. Neil S Greenspan who works as Professor at the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio concocted some schemes and monetized websites such as leagle.com in 1997. In 1998 Dr. Neil S Greenspan concocted this Think Computer Corporation out of Cleveland, Ohio as a "For Profit".

    Dr. Neil S Greenspan slow and steady masterminded this entire criminal enterprise with patience and a criminal mind.

    In the year 2000 Dr. Neil S Greenspan transferred this entire criminal organization out to the State of Delaware and changed the Tax Filing from a "For Profit" to a "Non Profit", which by the way is a complete financial fraud. Then on January 1, 2010 Dr. Neil S Greenspan being the VP and Treasurer, remember "Treasurer", as this individual is the financial mastermind behind all of this concocted scam and he put his crazy son Aaron Jacob Greenspan at the helm as CEO and President to deflect from the mastermind of this entire criminal operation to gain access to easy money by the one and only Dr. Neil S Greenspan. Dr. Neil S Greenspan needs money to support Simon Greenspan who is autistic and his son Aaron Jacob Greenspan has mental health issues as well.

    Without this entire Tax Fraud Scam which is a "Cash Cow" for Dr. Neil S Greenspan he possibly would have been bankrupt at this point. Instead, Dr. Neil S Greenspan decided he was going to screw the rest of Americans over with all kinds of vicious monetized websites such as plainsite.org and many more.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a Pawn in his Father's organized criminal Tax Fraud Scam endeavors.

    Comments
    Comments

    10 Votes
  • Aa
    Aaron_Greenspan_Fraud Jun 24, 2018
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Aaron Greenspan | HuffPost
    Huffington Post › author
    aaron-greenspan

    Neil S. Greenspan | HuffPost
    Huffington Post › author ›
    neil-s-greenspan

    9 Votes
  • De
    Detain Tax Scammers! Jun 27, 2018

    First of all uploaded documents on this complaint are "Public Domain" Documents from the State Department Business Licensing Office in Cleveland, Ohio. So, please do not remove!.
    Do not let this insane individual threaten this website in any way. This is our First Amendment Right to upload public domain documents and pictures and make any comment that we see fit.
    Aaron has collectved donations from his friends and colleagues, myself included in the amount of $100, 000, and to date we have not seen a single dime used in the manner described to us when he requested the donation. When I personally asked for my donation back, he pointed that he controls Think Computer Foundation and can personally use the money as he sees fit. I am in the process of filing suit for fraud and conversion in state court and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem with either Aaaron Greenspan or any of his alter egos.

    But let me back up a bit. What was described to us as a part of Think Computer Foundation and later Plain Site? Think Computer Foundation was purportedly to help needy kids through technology. But needy kids don't really need access to court records do they? No, they dont. So Think Computer Foundation later became synonymous with Plain Site, which is an alternative to the publicly funded PACER court system access to documents. So, instead of helping needy children, Aaron now has a personal site masquerading as a court access website and Aaron, and only Aaron, gets to pick what or which documents are uploaded and available on Plainsite.

    Comments

    11 Votes
  • Re
    Reno Nevada is the best Jun 27, 2018

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is copying and pasting copyright materials, altering the URL headers and doing all kinds of things that Hackers do, in order to continuously harass and stalk anyone who outs him to Law Enforcement Agencies, including Interpol.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan's father initiated this entire 501c(3) tax fraud that first started out in 1998 out of Cleveland, Ohio under the name Think Computer Corporation which initially was a "For Profit"

    In 2000 Dr. Neil S Greenspan who is a Professor at the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio came up with a great scam. Dr. Neil S Greenspan transferred this entire operation to the State of Delaware so that he could pass this tax fraud on to his son Aaron Jacob Greenspan, while he gives the outside world that he is some sort of goody two shoe Professor, when in fact Dr. Neil S Greenspan is the mastermind behind this entire IRS 501c(3) Tax Fraud Scam under the guise of "Helping the Children" but the fact of the matter is this entire Tax Fraud Scam was designed by Dr. Neil S Greenspan, in order to provide for himself and his family only a source of an easy income. Dr. Neil S Greenspan is the Vice President and Treasurer for this entire Tax Fraud operation, so even though Dr. Neil S Greenspan tries to make the public believe that he is some squeaky clean Professor who works at the Case Western Reserve University but the complete opposite is true. Dr. Neil S Greenspan is a devious, conniving, scammer who has masterminded this entire IRS 501c(3) Tax Fraud Operation from day one.

    The public can go to the following website in Delaware called "Division of Corporations" where there are about 6 pages on Think Computer Corporation. The cost is $10 for the first page and $2 for each additional page. Dr. Neil S Greenspan used a third party to set up his 501c(3) Tax Fraud Scheme in the State of Delaware.

    State of Delaware - Division of Corporations
    https://corp.delaware.gov/

    14 Votes
  • Th
    ThinkComputerFoundation Aug 08, 2018

    ROFl Aaron Greenspan continues to use sockpupet names. Now Aaron Greenspan is using the name John Fuenchem to harrass people.

    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    14 Votes
  • Sa
    Sara Genius Aug 10, 2018

    Hello everybody!

    What people have been stating on the forums about Aaron Greenspan being a Hacker is absolutely 100% true!

    Here is the evidence to prove that Aaron Greenspan is a professional Hacker who is accessing people's personal data using many illegal Hacking tools.

    "Greenspan says his fight is not simply about the money." Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! with this sicko its all about the money and is delusions of grandeur. This guys is extremely EVIL!

    Yes! Aaron Greenspan is the sinister "John Fuenchem" and this nut has many aliases on Reddit.com and all over the place. Aaron Greenspan has been harassing and stalking all of the people who run court listener.com and harassing all of the people that are somehow connected to courtlistener.com, because he is an extremely jealous and envious sicko who wants to completely control everything and of course that will lead to this nut making more money.

    After Aaron Greenspan did not get his way with his FaceCash he went on rampage suing half of Silicon Valley and the State of California like a maniac. All of these lawsuits by Aaron Greenspan were thrown out, or dismissed.

    Can the public imagine what would have happened to the world if this sicko did not have his FaceCash shut down? This guy was operating FaceCash without a license the entire time and then when the State of California. Aaron Greenspan never formally applied for a license to even open FaceCash. Aaron Greenspan was in violation of California's "Money Transmission Act", or MTA and was told that he would go to Federal Prison if he did not shut FaceCash down.

    The following is the link to the June 18, 2012 article "Above the Law", Facebook Litigation Continues: A Closer Look at Aaron Greenspan.
    https://abovethelaw.com/2012/06/facebook-litigation-continues-a-closer-look-at-aaron-greenspan/?_ga=2.126044106.658983444.1533946993-1398817778.1533946993

    The following is the entire article from this URL:

    COPYRIGHT, DEFAMATION, DEPOSITIONS, FACEBOOK, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SOCIAL MEDIA, SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES, TECHNOLOGY
    Facebook Litigation Continues: A Closer Look at Aaron Greenspan
    Was Aaron Greenspan the programmer Facebook forgot? Let's hear, in his own words, the story of his various lawsuits against the social network…
    By CHRISTOPHER DANZIG
    Jun 18, 2012 at 4:46 PM
    Last month, we wrote about another in the increasingly long list of Facebook creation story-related lawsuits. The plaintiff in that story was Aaron Greenspan, a college classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. While Greenspan was in school, he created a similar social network to what eventually became Facebook.

    Greenspan alleges that he was unfairly omitted from The Social Network, the 2011 film purportedly telling the history of Facebook. Greenspan felt so jilted at being left out of the movie that he sued the company that published The Accidental Billionaires, on which the hit movie was based (affiliate links).

    As of of our last story, Greenspan’s suit alleging “defamation by omission” had just been dismissed by a Massachusetts federal judge.

    But he appealed the decision to the First Circuit. Over the weekend, he also emailed us, and gave us more detail about his story. Let’s check in and hear what he has to say, along with a colorful deposition story from the old ConnectU case. There’s more than meets the eye to this tenacious programmer turned Facebook nemesis…

    I received the following email from Aaron Greenspan on Sunday afternoon (the entire note is reprinted on the following page):

    In your article on May 14th (https://abovethelaw.com/2012/05/another-one-of-zuckerbergs-former-classmates-tries-and-fails-to-cash-in-on-facebook/) you portrayed me as a hanger-on trying to get rich off of a tenuous connection to Facebook. You also compared me to Paul Ceglia and the Winklevoss twins. You don’t have your facts straight, and the comparison is insulting.

    First of all, I already settled with both Mark and Facebook in 2009, which I don’t think you mentioned in your post. See http://newsroom.fb.com/News/Facebook-and-Think-Computer-Corporation-Resolve-Trademark-Dispute-c6.aspx. While I certainly won’t complain if I’m ultimately awarded damages in the Mezrich case, your implied assertion that the suit is primarily motivated by money is not even close to true. I sued Mezrich because I’d had enough of listening to his lies and his three-hour interview on C-SPAN in November, 2011 was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Short Answers to Common Questions
    I am a US-licensed attorney living in Japan looking for a job in the US. Why is getting an interview so hard?

    KINNEY RECRUITING
    (For the record, I did briefly mention the settlement in the story. But that is neither here nor there.)

    Greenspan says his fight is not simply not about the money. It’s about trying to correct big-picture unfairness that it seems has been difficult to escape:

    I understand why you might be skeptical, but that’s exactly why I filed this suit. I shouldn’t be forced to battle that skepticism all my life.

    For what it’s worth, shortly after we published our first story about Greenspan, a tipster wrote to us who has a fairly impressive view of Zuckerberg’s former classmate:

    Extremely interesting guy. I know the lawsuit you wrote about is pretty frivolous, but he is only pursuing it because he really was kind of screwed in a way.

    Aaron… wrote software that was way ahead of its time and really did everything and more that “The Facebook” did at Harvard. When Aaron was at Harvard, it morphed into a system that allowed classmates to share reviews about classes and buy and sell used textbooks. There is no doubt in my mind that Zuckerberg borrowed — stole, if you will — fundamental aspects from Greenspan’s system when Zuckerberg designed his.

    Now, the design elements were not patented or copyrighted, so Greenspan was not able to pursue a lawsuit, but I can see why it would be pretty tough for him to sit and watch Zuckerberg become as wealthy and famous as he is while Greenspan became just another “classmate.” I suspect that Greenspan has more raw intelligence when it comes to coding. So, I think that is important insight into the BS lawsuit about defamation by omission. Greenspan is really upset that history, wealth and fame have omitted him.… Alas, life is not fair.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): Greenspan had this to say about our tipster’s note: “houseSYSTEM [the program he designed that, as the New York Times reported in 2007, was in some ways similar to Facebook] was copyrighted. I didn’t pursue a lawsuit because there weren’t any lawyers who would give me the time of day, and I didn’t know enough back then to do it myself.”

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    Representing Victims of Revenge Pornography
    Above the Law readers are offered 1 free CLE course each month, thanks to Lawline

    LAWLINE
    Our tipster also provided a comical, somewhat impressive anecdote about Greenspan:

    There also is a funny story I heard about a deposition in the Connect U case. The lawyers had technical problems, and Aaron took it upon himself to solve the issue.He unplugged a cord and all the lawyers gasped because they feared that the transcript and/or recording from the day’s session was lost. One of the lawyers questioned him about it, and Aaron looked at him condescendingly and said, “I think I know what I’m doing….”

    Later, they plugged in a computer with a projector so they could pull up some code and question Aaron about it. With a keyboard in front of him, he took all of about 3 minutes to hack into the law firm’s system and display their files on the screen, again to the horror of the lawyers. The lawyer I talked to said it was a pretty amusing moment and did highlight his computer acumen.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): For his part, Greenspan says he does not remember this happening at the ConnectU deposition.

    Check out Greenspan’s brief (and the appendix) in the defamation-by-omission case, which he filed pro se on June 13. To be fair, it is a bit dense and hard to follow. And it’s not the only Facebook-related litigation he is still involved in. Greenspan is also involved fighting Facebook about a program he created called FaceCash. As Greenspan explained in a follow-up email:

    After the settlement with Facebook in 2009, I began building a mobile payment system called FaceCash (http://www.facecash.com), and planned to release other products that made productive use of facial recognition technology as well. (Well before Facebook, Inc. was around, I took a course on the psychology of facial recognition freshman year in college, and ended up building http://www.faceblind.org, so it’s been an interest of mine for a while.) I registered a few trademarks with the USPTO accordingly. Facebook opposed one of them, for FACEMAIL. The docket is located at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91198355&pty=OPP. It’s not related to Mezrich at all, and only tangentially relates to the settlement issues.

    As it so happens, FaceCash is also tied up in litigation now, but that’s a whole different story unrelated to anything else. You can find that at https://www.facecash.com/legal/brown.html. It’s probably the most interesting and under-reported story of them all.

    Who knows where this clearly intelligent, combative programmer will end up. I’m not sure what the lesson here is, if there’s anything to be learned all. Maybe — especially if some of his claims are really true — it’s that life just isn’t fair.

    But to put a positive spin on it, you could quote John Updike, describing the best qualities in his famous character, Rabbit Angstrom: “[Y]ou haven’t given up. In your stupid way you’re still fighting.”

    Go through to the next page to see Greenspan’s original email, more links to court documents, and links to his personal project websites…

    1 2NEXT »
    TOPICS

    Aaron Greenspan, Ben Mezrich, ConnectU, Copyright, Defamation, Defamation by Omission, Depositions, Facebook, FaceCash, Federal Judges, Harvard, Intellectual Property, Mark Zuckerberg, Social Media, Social Networking Websites, Technology, The Accidental Billionaires, The Social Network, Winklevoss Twins

    11 Votes
  • Sa
    Sara Genius Aug 10, 2018

    Hello everyone!

    We are gearing up full steam ahead with a Class Action Lawsuit against Aaron Greenspan and that will include of course all the people who are named on his business documents.

    The following is an Article from August 6, 2013 called "American Banker" and the title is "How a California Law Put a Hot Payments Innovator on Ice".

    This guys should have been criminally charged for these crimes of operating FaceCash without even filing for a license in California. Its obvious that Aaron Greenspan thinks he is special and superior to the rest of the population. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! This guy thinks way too highly of himself. Wonder who instilled those crazy ideas in to him?

    The following is the URL for this article"
    https://www.americanbanker.com/news/how-california-law-put-a-hot-payments-innovator-on-ice

    The following is the full article describing this nut who thinks he is above the law and special:

    How California Law Put a Hot Payments Innovator on Ice

    By Sean Sposito
    Published August 06 2013, 6:05pm EDT
    More in Bank technology Law and regulation Disruptors
    Print
    Reprint
    Three years ago Aaron Greenspan had a hot mobile payments startup on his hands that was poised to take a bite out of the entrenched card networks.

    Launched in April 2010, FaceCash signed up 25 Bay Area merchants and 500 consumers to use its novel technology, which combined mobile bar code scanning and photo identification. A Subway franchise in Palo Alto tested the service. Some suggested FaceCash could become the next blockbuster payments innovator after Jack Dorsey's Square.

    Then regulators put Greenspan out of business.

    In 2011, a new state law took effect that put fledgling payments companies at the mercy of the California Department of Financial Institutions. That April, the department notified Greenspan that FaceCash required a domestic money transmitter license under the new law. After a discouraging meeting with regulators in mid-June, Greenspan says, he spent weeks trying to get clear answers from the state: What steps did FaceCash have to take to get licensed? How much capital did it need?

    No guidance was forthcoming. Instead, Greenspan says, a state examiner warned him to give up.

    "I was literally told, 'You will go to federal prison if you don't shut down, ' " he says.

    While an extreme example, Greenspan's story highlights a broader problem, one that threatens to constrain innovation in financial services at a time when the industry desperately needs to catch up with changes in technology and consumer preferences.

    Across the country, state money transmitter licensing requirements are potentially barring or at least slowing young businesses from entering the payments field. But the issue is especially salient in California, which is home to one of the country's biggest clusters of startups, in Silicon Valley, and has one of the toughest laws. Its requirements are opaque, outdated and inapplicable to emerging business models, the process expensive and time-consuming, critics argue.

    Greenspan (no relation to Alan) is hardly the ideal poster child. With a history of making sensational claims (he's alleged that his Harvard classmate, Mark Zuckerberg, stole his ideas for Facebook) and filing lawsuits (naming more than a dozen Silicon Valley investors and money services businesses in the last 12 months), he has acquired a reputation as a crank.

    But when it comes to the effects of California's money transmitter law, cooler heads say Greenspan has a point.

    "Is it stopping innovation? Certainly, " says Bradley Leimer, the head of digital strategy at Mechanics Bank in Richmond, Calif. "Is it stopping competition to be able to provide smaller startups with the ability to move money? Absolutely."

    State money transmitter regulations in general are unduly onerous for companies that pose little risk to the consumers they are ostensibly designed to protect, critics say. "You are not talking about people who are trying to set up a bank, or people that are trying to set up complex derivatives, " says Dave Birch, the founding director of Consult Hyperion in the U.K. "It's really just people that are trying to send 10 bucks from Place A to Place B."

    The burdens are stifling creativity at a pivotal moment for payments, warns Birch, who focuses on payments technology.

    "This is a time where we need more experimentation, " he says. "You have tremendously innovative people, especially in the mobile space, that need to be freed up to come up with new solutions."

    California has long required licenses for foreign money transmission, but didn't require domestic money movers to obtain a license until then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the Money Transmission Act, or MTA, in 2010. The law, which took effect in the beginning of 2011, also collapsed three different licenses — one for travelers check issuers, another for money order sellers and a third for foreign money transmitters — into one.

    PayPal and others that already had the old kinds of licenses didn't need to reapply for the new ones. But new entrants were left to navigate a set of befuddling guidelines.

    For instance, applicants must schedule interviews with California regulators before they can even put in the paperwork. And the law gives the commissioner of the Department of Business Oversight (successor to the agency that foiled Greenspan) great leeway in deciding who does, and does not, get a license. The minimum net worth for licensees is $500, 000, but the exact amount required of any applicant is left to the commissioner's discretion.

    If rejected, an applicant can appeal the commissioner's decision to a judge. But the appeal process can begin only if the commissioner makes a decision one way or the other. There is no rule saying a commissioner has to make a decision, though a judge can force her to.

    Of the 45 applications that were filed between 2011 and the end of July, 31 licenses were issued. But a company is unlikely to apply unless it is fairly certain of success.

    FaceCash never formally applied for a license. Without a clear sense of the prerequisite requirements, Greenspan says, he feared losing the nonrefundable $5, 000 application fee. After shuttering FaceCash in mid-2011, he sued the state, claiming, among other things, that the department violated his right to due process by refusing to provide the information he needed to apply for a license "with a reasonable chance of approval."

    Two California attorneys at separate firms representing clients with active applications say the law is by far the country's most onerous when it comes to capital requirements.

    Teveia Barnes, commissioner of the Department of Financial Institutions from 2012 until last month (when it merged with the Department of Corporations to form the DBO), has acknowledged licensing decisions are subjective.

    "It's really an art form in that we don't treat every applicant the same, " she said in March, at a hearing of the California Assembly Banking and Finance Committee. (Barnes is now the executive director of the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank.)

    At the same hearing, Barnes hinted that the department preferred to award licenses to companies with ample capital — which startups lack, particularly in the early stages.

    "I view the holding of other people's money in the same vein as I view bank deposits, " she said. "I don't think they are barriers to entry, I think they are consumer protections."

    Barnes and her successor, Department of Business Oversight Commissioner Jan Lynn Owen, did not respond to requests for comment submitted through a spokeswoman. The department never responded to a list of questions asked by email.

    William Haraf, Barnes' predecessor who ran the department when FaceCash was in operation, is now a managing director at Promontory Financial, the high-powered Washington consulting firm known for hiring former regulators. He declined to discuss the MTA for this story.

    The chairman of the California Assembly's Banking and Finance Committee is attempting to reform the MTA. At the beginning of the year, assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, introduced a bill that would amend the law, making the commissioner's decisions more transparent and, most important, lowering the capital requirements to between $250, 000 and $500, 000 in equity, depending on the amount of money a licensee is moving.

    "What's occurring in the real world is changing very rapidly, " Dickinson says. While "leaving enough flexibility to allow additional innovation and change, " he says, the amendment would "at the same time ensure … there are adequate protections for consumers. So there is a balancing … of trying to protect new and innovative techniques and approaches, on the one hand, but at the same time preserving guarantees."

    Still, the proposed amendment to the MTA would leave the commissioner of the DBO plenty of wiggle room in deciding who to give a license on the basis, for example, of the quality of an applying company's operations and management.

    The earliest that amendment would be approved is by the end of this month. The California Legislature returned from recess Aug. 5.

    State laws nationwide tend to define money transmission so broadly that even bike messengers and app stores would appear to require licenses in some jurisdictions, according to a recent paper by Kevin Tu, an assistant professor at the New Mexico School of Law.

    Most states exempt the U.S. Postal Service and banks from money transmitter licensing requirements. There are other exemptions, but "they vary from state to state, so there is no consistency, " Tu says. "And as a general matter, there are few if any exemptions that might arguably apply to exempt some of these new mobile payment systems from the licensing requirements."

    (These laws, framed as consumer-protection measures, are separate from the federal registration, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for financial institutions designed to combat money laundering.)

    In his paper, Tu calls for reforms that would narrow the scope of state regulations to cover only "services that pose a real risk of loss" to the consumer. A traditional money transmitter like Western Union, entrusted to deliver a consumer's money to a recipient, would remain fair game. But third-party mobile and Internet payment providers, which accept money from customers on merchants' behalf, would be exempt, since the consumer is not affected if the provider stiffs the merchant.

    California's definition of a money transmitter is so broad that even households could be considered within regulators' purview, says Tom Brown, a partner at the law firm Paul Hastings in San Francisco.

    "It's written in such a way as to be enforceable against any business or household because the critical language is a money transmitter is defined as somebody who receives money for others, " Brown says.

    Some entrepreneurs are ignoring the rules altogether, says Omar Green, a former Intuit executive who left his post last October to launch a personal financial management startup called wallet.AI, based in San Francisco.

    "I think what's happening in this space right now, in general, is an attempt by some very, very small, well-meaning and enterprising companies to figure out how to open up some of the controls, " Green says. "The shortest path to do that is to do things, make mistakes and ask for forgiveness later and that's very often what the strategy is."

    Of course, that's a high-risk strategy. Under the USA Patriot Act, the federal government can bring felony charges against a company caught acting as a money transmitter without the blessing of one of the states.

    Even if a business gets permission in California, doing business nationwide requires licenses in all the 48 states that require such approval. Not long after his run-in with California regulators, Greenspan estimated in a white paper that at minimum, an applicant trying to gain licenses nationwide would need to obtain at least $7.8 million in surety bonds and spend nearly $71, 000 on application and licensing fees.

    To that end, some are arguing for one national standard rather than many separate state laws.

    "I think we need to go federal, " says David Landsman, executive director of the National Money Transmitters Association. "What we have now is exactly like having a separate FAA in each state."

    Greenspan, more than any other applicant, has been screaming about the California MTA since its inception. He's responsible for bringing it to the attention of reporters and lawmakers.

    During its 14 months of operation, FaceCash offered a reduced-friction alternative to credit and debit cards. Instead of swiping a piece of plastic at checkout, a shopper would scan a barcode from a mobile phone (a method later made popular by Starbucks). Instead of asking for a signature or PIN, the cashier would eyeball a photo of the accountholder's face on the terminal screen to make sure it matched the customer's. And instead of paying anywhere from 2% to 5% to accept a credit card, the merchant would pay FaceCash just 1.5%. (The funds were withdrawn from the consumer's prepaid FaceCash account.) The technology was deployed primarily in restaurants and stores on Stanford University's campus and across Palo Alto.

    When American Banker interviewed him in mid-May, Greenspan was sharing a ranch home in the center of Silicon Valley littered with reminders of his personally financed, million-dollar venture. (He has said regulatory uncertainty prevented FaceCash from raising the venture capital that might have helped the outfit meet the state's nebulous net-worth requirements.) The scene was reminiscent of a college dormitory.

    The first thing visible past the front door was an outdated point-of-sale machine propped against the couch. Across from that there was a flat screen connected to a Wii and an XBox.

    Podcast Consumer Protection without Friction
    Learn how to stop identity theft in its tracks—without adding friction to the consumer experience.
    SPONSOR CONTENT FROM

    Mitigating Consumer Friction and Fraud
    June 25, 2018
    Greenspan's circumstances have clearly weighed on him. Well-worn clothes hang off his gaunt frame. He now lives off a pittance he makes from PlainSite, a legal project partly supported by Stanford's law school, and from his savings — most likely from a legal settlement over Facebook's trademark.

    Greenspan says his litigious streak is born out of a sense of right and wrong. He draws a parallel between his fight with California to offer mobile payments and his adult autistic brother's fight for access to social services.

    "I don't view money as being the most important thing in the world, " Greenspan says. "It's a combination of that idealism and the absolute intolerance for all of these things that most people just take for granted because that's just the way they are. Because if you just let all that stuff slide, people like my brother die."

    Print
    Reprint
    Comment

    Aaron Greenspan is the harasser in chief using the alias "John Fuenchem" who has been relentlessly stalking the people who run courtlistener.com, including all the Board Members of courtlistener.com and has even gone on to harass people who are friends with the people who run courtlister.com. Aaron Greenspan being a Hacker is using some sort of Hacking Tool to hide his IP address and it is showing up as if it is in Toronto, Canada. We know who is there and and many of the Hacking Tricks that Aaron Greenspan is using.

    8 Votes
  • Sa
    Sara Genius Aug 10, 2018

    The following is an article from "Hacker News" about Aaron Greenspan and he is angry at Silicon Valley. This article is in the appropriate venue of Hacker News, Aaron Greenspan is a HACKER!

    The following is the URL about Aaron Greenspan is Hacker News
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5678275

    Here is the article about Aaron Greenspan the HACKER!

    Aaron Greenspan makes money by using Fraud, Intimidation, Suing for free money, Threatening people. Harassing people, Stalking people, Lying, Scamming people and most importantly being a CRIMINAL HACKER!

    Here is the article about Aaron Greenspan the HACKER!

    Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login
    Why I'm Furious with Silicon Valley (2011) (aarongreenspan.com)
    113 points by wslh on May 9, 2013 | hide | past | web | favorite | 81 comments

    coffeemug on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Rather than invest in a productive, useful and frankly unprecedented product such as FaceCash, venture capital and angel investors have focused their time and billions of dollars of their money in companies and entrepreneurs that have, in serial fashion, deceived co-founders, deceived employees, and deceived customers.
    Rather than hiring a brilliant, hard working, and frankly outstanding engineer such as myself, technology companies have focused their time and billions of dollars of their money on engineers that have demonstrated, in a consistent fashion, lack of talent, skills, and integrity.

    angersock on May 9, 2013 [-]

    That's very cute and all, but do you care to skim TechCrunch or something and say, with a straight face, that primarily worthwhile endeavors are getting funded?
    Tell me about social, mobile, or the like.

    nemothekid on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't think that is very honest considering FaceCash (not entirely sure) didn't beat Square to market, and I don't believe his idea was very "wild and unprecedented" as he claimed.
    Yes, seemingly dumb start up ideas get funded, but at the same time a lot of dumb and smart ideas don't get any attention, and there are still a good number of smart ideas that do get funded.
    If he couldn't get anyone to back his mobile payments idea, I think it says more about him and his character more than his idea. It's my belief that the reason someone funds/works for you can be attributed to less than half to how good your idea was, especially something that is really early stage.

    flexxaeon on May 9, 2013 [-]

    yeah it does come off a bit narcissistic

    alan_cx on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Forgive my ignorance, but he talks about "necessary capital", and fails to explain why and what it is for. Is this something the regulators demand in order to protect his customers? Isn't that desirable?
    Further, if he has put $1m in to the project, should he not have checked that laws and regulation first?
    Perhaps the writer assumes a lot of knowledge on the part of the reader.

    McGlockenshire on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > should he not have checked that laws and regulation first?
    The regulations came into existence after his project did.
    After the regulations went into effect, he was unable to get his project certified under the regulations.

    7Figures2Commas on May 9, 2013 [-]

    This is called regulatory risk. This story seems like a good example of why anyone starting a business in an industry that is already highly-regulated, such as finance, must assume that future regulations could increase the cost of doing business, or threaten the viability of the business outright.

    beachstartup on May 9, 2013 [-]

    i'm not going to go into specifics because i'm scared of retaliation/retribution. there, i said it. i'm scared like a little bitch. especially now that i've got plenty to lose (read on...)
    imagine the following scenario.
    CEO (not me) of self-funded startup hires prestigious silicon valley law firm to incorporate and represent his new company.
    recruits 4 cofounders including big-name software company engineers and big-name b-school MBAs. however, nobody is 'connected' per se.
    ostensibly law firm does its job, and helps coordinate meetings with the TOP valley and seattle VCs. like top 3 in each area. like 'holy shit' what am i doing in this board room right now. like 'wow i can't believe i actually delivered my pitch without tripping over my own tongue'.
    during the fund raising process it's discovered the name of the company may be a copyright/trademark infringement on another company also represented by the law firm.
    founders are assured by law firms and VCs it's no big deal. it happens all the time. this sort of thing is very common! law firm could stand to charge 10 thousand in fees for a name change, so it seems like an honest opinion.
    during the fund raising process it's also discovered that the core business model of startup is in sort-of competition with another startup, already funded, represented by both the law firm, and a VC firm that lawfirm set startup up with to pitch. (of course no NDA's were signed). however, the business models are not identical, only similar. assurances all around, of course.
    fast forward 2 months. startup is getting traction. 10, 000 users, some high profile sites are using startup's technology.
    fast forward another month. threats of lawsuit from represented company whose trademark claim is now becoming serious.
    fast forward another month. sort-of competitor is now full-on competitor. exact same concept is now implemented and deployed.
    no need to fast forward anymore. funding is never realized, company is under legal threat from multiple parties. other mistakes are made, but greatly exacerbated by a name change, which effectively kills the product. company implodes. kaput.
    the conclusion of whether this was purely due to founder incompetence or naiveté (which there is certainly a component) or there was a large component of malicious VC/lawyer/funded collusion is left as an exercise for the reader.
    however, i posit that the startup would have done FAR BETTER to not even get involved with the SV ecosystem IN THE FIRST PLACE. once you get involved, they will enforce their iron rule of SINK OR SWIM. and they WILL sink you.
    my current startup is making $millions/year in revenue WITHOUT ANY OUTSIDE HELP. cofounders own 100% because we said FUCK IT over 2 glasses of scotch whisky and dumped $250k of our own money into it. we get multiple emails and calls per month from VC and PE firms inquiring. lollerskates. fuck off assholes. i would rather go bankrupt and steal loaves of stale bread from my local bagel shop than work for those people.
    so that's just one data point for you. it's a jungle out there. keep your wits about you.

    randall on May 9, 2013 [-]

    This is why you work with YC.
    If you're going to get into the SV ecosystem, in order to stay away from the bad actors, I think you have to align yourselves with the forces for good. You think anyone will fuck with a YC company like that? Only if they want to be lambasted among most of the new / best / most promising startup founders in the valley.

    nickpinkston on May 9, 2013 [-]

    You're painting it like the mafia - like...exactly like the mafia...

    beachstartup on May 9, 2013 [-]

    he's painting it like a business, which the mafia is. they just happen to do nothing but illegal projects.

    michaelochurch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    In some societies, the organized crime contingent is morally better (and sometimes more competent) than the official police force.
    In the private sector where "law" is the whim of powerful people, that's almost invariably true.
    Whatever the good guys form (possibly centered around YC, and possibly something else) is going to be likened to the Mafia, a "don't fuck with us" collective that protects its own. After all, one of the Mafia's first (entirely just) social functions was to protect people against Pinkertons and other company police forces.
    The thing is, those with capital and connections have been using their social power for extortion ("you'll never raise another dime") for decades. If talent starts to fight back, that's a good thing.

    clobber on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I agree he seems to be completely proving the parent poster's point along with the one from michaelochurch (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5678332).

    angersock on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Yeah, I'm not sure if the threat--justified or not--of a sort of mob outrage and harassment is really a sign of a healthy ecosystem.
    It's one thing to promote a culture where people help each other, another to promote one where people are cautioned about bad actors, and another still to seek to defame "bad actors".
    I'm not sure, especially in an industry whose demographics tend to the young and aggressive, that we want to be encouraging this sort of gang mentality.
    We've got shit to build and code to ship--who has time to beat their chest?

    randall on May 9, 2013 [-]

    To be clear, the bad guys are not the startup founders. They're the old school VCs and lawyers spoken of, who are used to taking advantage of startup founders.
    YC is a force for good in that without doing anything, bad actors are weeded out because nobody wants to be mean / do bad things to a YC company.

    mindcrime on May 9, 2013 [-]

    during the fund raising process it's discovered the name of the company may be a copyright/trademark infringement on another company also represented by the law firm.
    Just to play devil's advocate a little bit... shouldn't the founders of this startup have known about a possible name conflict earlier? It's not that hard to use Google and/or the USPTO database to do a basic search that will turn up potential name collisions.
    That said, the law firm should certainly have disclosed any possible conflict of interest immediately and probably should have sent you to a different firm.
    And the moral of this story, as far as I can tell, is "If you're working with any law firm or VC and even a hint of conflict of interest shows up, run, do not walk, away as fast as you can".

    beachstartup on May 9, 2013 [-]

    search for 'incompetence' and 'naivete' in my post.
    second of all, law firm client lists and VC client lists are not complete. you think they put all that shit on their website???

    mindcrime on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > second of all, law firm client lists and VC client lists are not complete. you think they put all that shit on their website???
    I agree, they wouldn't put that on their website. And, if they are an ethical firm, they would both disclose the conflict AND send you somewhere else as soon as any hint of a conflict appears.
    That the firm in question didn't do that says something very sad about the state of business ethics among some people in this world. :-(

    OldSchool on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Well said. You don't need OPM to make millions and quietly live well if your product offers value to your customer.
    For everyone else, if you're more motivated by a potential 15 seconds of fame and lottery-like odds of becoming a billionaire if lightning strikes and enough is left after every non-producer takes his cut ahead of you, by all means, play the VC game and keep them distracted.

    paulsutter on May 9, 2013 [-]

    If the law firm had been trying to screw you over, they wouldn't have told you about the trademark conflict. But they told you. Are you blaming them that you ignored the advice?
    Do your homework. Choose deliberately the VCs you pitch, review their portfolio. Check if a name is already trademarked.
    VCs are likely to share information learned, although they usually "anonymize" the facts. They're more likely to share market insights than product features. And when they do it, they _feel_ like they are sharing their general learnings, not sharing your secrets. Factor that into your planning.
    But, startups are usually too busy to use suggestions that come in from VCs. I've never heard of a startup taking a new business strategy from a law firm. Nor have I ever had a law firm share sensitive information about another client with me, and I've spent thousands of hours working with different Silicon Valley lawyers over the last 20 years.

    beachstartup on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > Are you blaming them that you ignored the advice?
    uh, their advice was to NOT change the name, which could be interpreted as
    a) they wanted us to not lose momentum or
    b) they wanted to set a trap for us in the future
    probably all of the above.
    you probably skipped more than just a couple lines of my story if you didn't even catch that little detail. read it again, the style is casual but it's fairly fact-dense.
    i wasn't the CEO, i was just a kid. i probably would have changed the name.
    and it might shock you to learn VCs/lawyers deal with different people differently. you look like an oldconnectedwhiteguy from your linkedin profile.

    taejo on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > If the law firm had been trying to screw you over, they wouldn't have told you about the trademark conflict. But they told you. Are you blaming them that you ignored the advice?
    > founders are assured by law firms and VCs it's no big deal.
    The problem is exactly that they took the advice. Without supposed experts telling them it wasn't a problem, they would probably have changed the name.

    ISL on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Note date of 2011.

    redthrowaway on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Yes, the mods should probably edit the title lest people mistakenly think it's part of his lawsuit.

    brianbreslin on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Where did he get a million bucks?

    politician on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Is this a federal law or a state law? The content of the article seems to imply state law, but the "gloom and doom" tone implies that FaceCash can't just move out of CA.

    dangrossman on May 9, 2013 [-]

    It's state law, but virtually every state licenses money transmitters, and you need a license from each state you want to transmit money into (where your customers are). No matter where you start, you need the licenses, and CA is particularly important since that's where the early adopters and investors are. Here's the list of 50 state licenses PayPal needs to operate:
    https://www.paypal-media.com/state_licenses.cfm

    barretts on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't know the details here but this missive reads like that of someone who failed and turned to the litigation system for revenge.

    josephagoss on May 9, 2013 [-]

    The government was forcing him to shut down his company, I would turn to litigation if this happened to me.

    michaelochurch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't know about his past with Zuckerberg, but this guy's basically a hero for calling VC-istan out for what it is: a rigged, corrupt mess where one's personal level of power determines which laws one must actually follow and which ones can be ignored.
    Consider all the co-funding and note-sharing that goes on among supposedly competing investors. That's clearly anti-competitive activity, but it's never enforced because of the power of the people who do it.
    It sounds like his particular lawsuit is without legal ground and will fail, but he deserves major props for bringing public attention to VC-istan's collusion problem.
    As I wrote, he's already morally entitled to an EIR position (at the very least, if not a real VC job) from VC-istan for his courage, intellect, and ethical above-board-ness, which are well into the top 5% by VC-istan standards (although that's not saying much).

    ryguytilidie on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Like most things, we simply hold the rich and the powerful to a different standard. Steve Cohen can rob the American economy blind and even if the multiple teams of FBI agents surveiling him actually catch him and prosecute him, he will be in jail for a few years at most, only to slink back to his billions of dollars in wealth right after that will enrich his family for generations. Meanwhile the homeless guy who did some crack on the corner? 15 years.
    I really wonder sometimes if it is actually possible to fail in some of these situations. If you don't have to follow the same laws as everyone else and know there won't be consequences, you're going to crush your competition of not rich people who actually applied for permits and stuff. Because your competition knew if they didn't get them, they would pretty much be shut down, while these other companies basically said "lol laws" and like most companies who do, reaped massive rewards.

    josdewolk on May 9, 2013 [-]

    This situation is multiplied further, many times over, in developing countries.

    michaelochurch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I think Aaron Greenspan is (as I am, to a lesser extent) a moral mysophobe. Most people know the world is run by scumbags and human garbage, but they adapt. It just becomes another landscape feature to them, like bad weather or dogshit on the sidewalk.
    Then there are other people who see unethical behavior and, for whatever reason, can't "just get over it" like normal people. They end up taking some immensely energy-consuming moral stands that often aren't in their individual interests.
    Such people are immensely beneficial to society, but it's not fun to be one.

    will_brown on May 9, 2013 [-]

    >Then there are other people who see unethical behavior and, for whatever reason, can't "just get over it" like normal people. They end up taking some immensely energy-consuming moral stands that often aren't in their individual interests.
    Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela fall in that category to name a few. It is no coincidence all three suffered similar injustices to the extent they did including subjugation by the Government (Powers that be)not limited to incarceration, but when most would give up their spirit prevailed and they never waivered in their sense of justice.

    w1ntermute on May 9, 2013 [-]

    For every Gandhi, King, and Mandela, there were a thousand others like them who were subjugated or killed without ever seeing any success in creating social change. Don't allow survivorship bias[0] to cloud your logic.
    0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias

    glurgh on May 9, 2013 [-]

    The entire notion of calling a broad class of people whom you seemingly know nothing of beside accusing them of 'running the world' (itself an idea worthy of closer examination) 'scumbags' and 'human garbage' ought to be giving you very, very serious moral pause.

    olefoo on May 9, 2013 [-]

    To be powerful in a corrupt society is a sign of corruption is it not?
    When you live in a world where the highest levels of society are literally "above the law", torture as policy is considered acceptable, might makes right, and democracy has been for sale for so long that it's newsworthy when a politician refuses sponsorship; it is very hard to make an argument that anyone who pays attention to the news does not have a very clear idea of the moral status of our ruling elites.

    glurgh on May 9, 2013 [-]

    It doesn't really matter what you or I think or whether we agree on the moral status of 'our ruling elites'.
    We do have, though, concrete empirical evidence of the eventual consequences of casually thinking of and referring to others, any others at all, as 'human garbage'.
    The moral status of that line of thought is much more clear - it's noxious and if there's some sort of moral thing we ought to agree on is that it's to be rejected and opposed, wherever it pops up.
    [Edit: and to completely Godwin up this thread - if there's a day to take 30 seconds to think about the implications of such rhetoric, today, V-E day, is a good one].

    olefoo on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Well, if we're going full Godwin; it might be good for you and all those of us who are US Citizens to reflect on the fact that our country is currently the one running the most notorious concentration camp on the planet and has admitted to running such camps in Iraq, Afghanistan and even Diego Garcia. When the histories of this era are written we probably won't be the good guys; if we ever were.

    glurgh on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Sure but then it's not a contest of moral turpitude. Gitmo is probably better than any camp in North Korea, it doesn't make it any less despicable.
    Calling VC 'human garbage' is, at the end of the day, just nerd message-board hyperventilating. And it's still completely repugnant and talking about other repugnant things doesn't make it any less so.

    michaelochurch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I actually never said that VCs were human garbage. Some of them are, some are not. I tend to think that most are not, but that many of the "cool kids" are.
    My direct experience (which is not with VCs) is that the VC-darling startups are mostly run by human garbage, which raises questions about who funds them. Does this mean there are probably some horrible VCs? Yes, absolutely. Does it mean that all VCs are that way? Of course not. There are plenty of good ones out there, too.
    My feelings about this suit are complicated. Look, Al Capone was nabbed on tax fraud, rather than the harder-to-prove but more vicious shit he did. If the Greenspan suit starts a process that puts an end to VC note-sharing and co-funding and social-proof calls-- against the spirit of the law, but hard to prove on an individual basis-- then I'm all for it.

    fearless on May 9, 2013 [-]

    How much VC funding has Gitmo raised? I must have missed the Techcrunch post about the evil VCs who finance concentration camps.

    comatose_kid on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I'm not sure what most people know, but I think calling the group of people who 'run the world' scumbags is extreme

    katbyte on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I kinda think its sad that "just getting over it" is considered normal.

    protomyth on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Well, you could go out and protest in a nice ways, but the media will just make jokes and tell people you believe something you don't. "Just getting over it" might be the sane thing to do.

    jrochkind1 on May 9, 2013 [-]

    if you can forget about it and get on with your life -- you (like me) have already got more power/comfort/privilege than most people, who are reminded all the time how much power jerks have to make the lives of those without power miserable.

    protomyth on May 10, 2013 [-]

    Oh, I never said I would forget about it. The government is quite able to make everyones live miserable (check the stupid sale tax law).

    droidist2 on May 9, 2013 [-]

    That's true, the media has become extremely effective at making a big joke out of any sort of movement or counter culture that emerges.

    cinquemb on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Unless ones views lead them down the path to end up taking the lives of innocent people who have for the most part "just get over it" when it comes to nearly everything in their life, then the media will try to seek every nook and cranny out to try to rationalize the incident in such a manor that there will be those in power who will use it for their own purposes (whatever they may be) ultimately drowning out any deeper discussion on how such a an incident came to be.

    coffeemug on May 9, 2013 [-]

    You mean the Don Quixotes of modern society?

    PavlovsCat on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Why Don Quixote? Why not Sophie Scholl?

    hcarvalhoalves on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > Such people are immensely beneficial to society, but it's not fun to be one.
    It is when you win.

    enraged_camel on May 9, 2013 [-]

    If you win. And that's a big if.

    throwaway1980 on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Mostly when you post it ends up being the top comment in a thread. I wouldn't have a problem with this except that all (or maybe 99%) of your comments are about the same thing: people in positions of corporate or financial power abusing that authority. I don't even think it's necessarily a problem to say these kinds of things, but I was just wondering if you could also post some random comments about other stuff.

    oinksoft on May 9, 2013 [-]

    For fun, plug "vc-istan" into HN search.

    coffeemug on May 9, 2013 [-]

    A rigged, corrupt mess where one's personal level of power determines which laws one must actually follow and which ones can be ignored.
    Do you have a shred of evidence to support any of these accusations? Not that I think the VC industry is devoid of problems, but in my experience it is neither rigged nor corrupt, and the people with the most power actually tend to be the most morally conscious people I've ever met.

    sjtgraham on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I think your language indicates some bias here. To play Devil's advocate for a moment, the bankers that manipulated LIBOR did so for quite some time without being caught. Those whom submitted the rates they thought their bank could borrow from other banks at wielded incredible power, magnitudes more than any VC, i.e. contracts worth $300 TRILLION were influenced by LIBOR. It was shown that these bankers acted, most would agree completely immorally, without conscience, artificially influencing the rates to suit their own trader's positions.

    jamesaguilar on May 9, 2013 [-]

    He's biased because he doesn't buy into the conspiracy theory without some evidence? Hmm.

    enraged_camel on May 9, 2013 [-]

    No, he's biased because, by his own admission, he's basing his opinions on anecdotal evidence, i.e. those VCs he has met are very ethical people. Whereas we have a ton more data points to prove that power = corruption. Considering the amount of power VCs yield in Silicon Valley, it's pretty much a given that they break the law and get away with it.

    calhoun137 on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Take a look at this amazing book by Glenn Greenwald, it has an overwhelming amount of evidence, examples, and very well thought out arguments:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=Je_fc_WjF9oC&printsec=f...

    crag on May 9, 2013 [-]

    "morally conscious people.."?
    What? A banker? Morally conscious? You believe that I got a bridge to sell you.

    geekam on May 9, 2013 [-]

    >> the people with the most power actually tend to be the most morally conscious people I've ever met.
    This is also anecdotal too. The people you've met.

    philwelch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Aaron Greenspan has made a name for himself as someone who's accomplished nothing but still holds irrational grudges and is totally incapable of letting go to the point of repeatedly constructing epic narratives in which he's the victim, in the mistaken belief that this somehow reflects on others more than it does him. I can see why you identify with him.

    smutticus on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't buy into your narrative.
    I greatly appreciate the fact that someone is trying to innovate in this space and I wish him success. I don't know or care if he self identifies as a victim like you describe. I just appreciate him for his actions and tenacity.

    philwelch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Tenacity implies honest attempts to succeed. Aaron Greenspan reads as someone who sets himself up to fail in order to reinforce his own persecution complex. Tenacious people adapt and go around obstacles, they don't run straight into them and waste their time whining about it to everyone who will listen.

    enraged_camel on May 9, 2013 [-]

    >>I can see why you identify with him.
    Not sure if this potshot was called for.

    Hitchhiker on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Just a side-note, making a name via accomplishing nothing is common, various sub-types such as that you hint at above are perhaps further taxonomy ?
    Rebels eventually wish to be kings. Some actually get there. Then the cycle repeats.
    My worry here is that individuals are paying more attention to specific actors who as powerful as they appear to be are not as formidable as systems they represent.
    Its almost rare to see such wounded attitudes from an equally matched adversary.
    The other direction is full scale martyr which was also displayed recently .. I'd rather not take the name to avoid pain for those close to the kid.

    lisper on May 9, 2013 [-]

    And what have you done?

    philwelch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    True, I'm no one special. That's even what it says if you click through to my profile on here. But at least I don't live my entire life as a self-perpetuating persecution complex, pausing only to write self-righteous screeds about those whom I perceive to have wronged me (or worse yet, file lawsuits).

    sillysaurus on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Why do you live life bullying those who are actually trying to accomplish something?

    philwelch on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't. When Aaron Greenspan makes the front page of HN for honestly trying to accomplish something rather than whining about how the world is out to get him or suing a who's who of Silicon Valley, I'll be the first to congratulate him.

    jholman on May 9, 2013 [-]

    It's interesting that you have the top comment, MC, and call him a hero, because I was just thinking how much his writing style reminds me of yours.

    prostoalex on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I was with you until "if not a real VC job". Why would anyone offer him a VC job? Is his investment track record such that it beats the index funds? Or is it the name recognition and ability to get into the top deals (following A16Z's model where only 5-10 companies really matter long-term)?

    greenlander on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Think Computer Corporation has documented their dispute with the State of California in great detail, including scans of all the physical correspondence.
    https://www.facecash.com/legal/brown.html
    If you read through the history, it's pretty clear that Think Computer Corporation got screwed by California. California classified him as a money transmitter, but refused to clearly define the bar needed for him to become one. It's obviously a case of favoring the big guy for now reason. Facebook and BoA can be money transmitters, because they're big. You're not big, you're a scrub, now go to get job at Facebook like the other scrubs. Obviously, this latest lawsuit makes him look like an obnoxious dickhead. I can nevertheless sympathize with his action here, which is to lash out at an obviously unfair system.

    wmf on May 9, 2013 [-]

    And yet somehow their competitors are still in business.

    lisper on May 9, 2013 [-]

    In large part because they chose to flout the law, and California chose not to prosecute them (yet). Be careful before you celebrate people who succeed because they choose to break the law. It's a very slippery slope.

    7Figures2Commas on May 9, 2013 [-]

    I don't think this is necessarily a fair assessment.
    In my brief reading the documents at the link referenced above, it appears that the author originally contacted the state of California, believing that he may be subject to the Money Transmission Act (MTA) based on his reading of the law. In his initial correspondence, he asks for clarification: is he actually engaged in operating a money transmission service, or is he an exempt payment processor?
    That seems like a simple question but the bureaucrats he's dealing with don't provide an answer. Instead, they appear to latch on to his correspondence and treat it as a representation that he is engaged in money transmission and therefore subject to the MTA. That's not exactly surprising: if he is subject to the MTA, there's a license involved, which generates revenue for the state.
    This leaves an interesting unanswered question: was the author ever subject to the law in the first place? Perhaps the competitors who you suggest are flouting the law brought the matter to their legal counsel, who concluded that they were exempt. That doesn't mean that they aren't, but the lack of prosecutions hints that this isn't an unreasonable possibility.
    One final comment about breaking the law: financial services are highly regulated and given the number of laws and regulations at the federal and state levels, I don't think any company in this space can ever be certain that it is not breaking some law. One thing is for sure however: if you're running a financial services company and have questions about a law, allowing legal counsel to research the matter and handle any correspondence with regulators is the best approach.

    lisper on May 9, 2013 [-]

    > was the author ever subject to the law in the first place? Perhaps the competitors who you suggest are flouting the law brought the matter to their legal counsel, who concluded that they were exempt.
    You can read the law and decide for yourself. The text is actually fairly clear: if you receive money from one party for the purpose of transmitting it to another party then you need a license.

    7Figures2Commas on May 9, 2013 [-]

    Reading laws and trying to determine what they mean when you are not an attorney is a dangerous pastime.

    mindcrime on May 9, 2013 [-]

    That tells us something about the nature of what passes for "law" in contemporary times, doesn't it? I mean, there's no particular reason that every single citizen shouldn't understand what is and what isn't illegal, without any need for a specialized class of judges, lawyers, etc. to interpret, debate, spin and mangle things.
    Limit the scope of government very narrowly, to about what Bastiat argued for[1] and a lot of this problem would go away.
    [1]: http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html

    on May 9, 2013 [-]

    [deleted]

    feniv on May 9, 2013 [-]

    The copyright reads 2001-2013, so I assume the code has evolved over time in design, but kept the old-school table layouts. If you look at the (admirably short) CSS file, most of it has to do with fonts and colors (and one block for drop shadows). All of the positioning is being handled by the table layout.
    It's "bad" code by today's web standards, but was once considered normal so I'm going to have to side with the developer here since the site functions well and displays beautifully.

    Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

    Search: Aaron Greenspan a highly skilled Hacker who has not yet been caught by Law Enforcement.

    7 Votes
  • Sa
    Sara Genius Aug 10, 2018

    The following article was written by Aaron Greenspan on October 12, 2014 and he states the following in the third paragraph:

    "It comes down to this: I am now a judge. I was not elected, nor was I appointed, nor am I strictly a volunteer. I am not a lawyer, and I do not have a J.D., though I did spend some months at a law school. I have no legally binding power. Nonetheless, it seems very clear that I am filling a judicial role, and what's more, to a certain extent, the internet is my court."

    Aaron Greenspan is stating that he is a "Judge" on the Internet and thinks he can do whatever he wants on the Internet.

    Aaron Greenspan in his own words states in the last paragraph:

    "On the other hand, their stubborn refusal to adopt new technologies clearly results in a far higher workload for themselves—and for other organizations that have sprung up to handle the fallout from their obstuse inability to recognize the digital world in which they function."

    The reason Aaron Greenspan states the above is because he knows how to Hack into people's computers, phones, WiFi systems and Servers using all kinds of Hacking methods and tools to do all of his dirty work. So what Aaron Greenspan wants is to force Judges and Courts to use his way of doing things with technology so he can illegally access everyone's information. Aaron Greenspan is a Hacker!

    Aaron Greenspan the Hacker in Chief! Aaron Greenspan the Judge of Judges when it comes to being a Hacker!

    The following is the URL for this crazy writing:
    http://www.aarongreenspan.com/writing/20141012/the-internet-court-is-now-in-session/

    Aaron Greenspan sues people who are better and much more superior to him, so he can try and subdue them and try to get his hands on some of that free money.

    Aaron Greenspan wants to make money but not by working for a living but by sitting back in his chair and tapping away on his keyboards to Hack into people's computers and Servers and then sue people to get some of their money for free.

    7 Votes
  • Sa
    Sara Genius Aug 10, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is a Hacker and a real Bad Person!

    Check out this article from August 7, 2018 on "Law Sites": https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    What the public needs to know is that all of these data mining companies communicate with each other on a regular basis and they all know who owns what site and who is doing what to who when it comes to these data mining legal document sites.

    They are all in cahoots! Its all about the money.

    Aaron Greenspan is the alias "John Fuenchem" and its incredible how he has so much time on his hands to communicate back and forth with the people who run court listener.com and then switch to his other personality "John Fuenchem". Could Aaron Greenspan be suffering from multiple personality disorder? Aaron Greenspan has so many aliases on Reddit.com and just too many to list here. Aaron Greenspan switches from character to the next and goes back and forth like he is not "John Fuenchem", when we have the proof that Aaron Greenspan is "John Fuenchem" and has been harassing and stalking the people who run courtlistener.com non-stop because he is a jealous envious evil and extremely sneaky.

    8 Votes
  • Fr
    Free Law Project Aug 11, 2018

    Aaron J Greenspan believes Free Law entitles you to harassment and stalking American Citizens. Clearly, Arron Greenspan is harassing the Free Law Project Board under the name John Fuenchem. Aaron Greenspan had been using this alias as far as 2011.

    Stalking and harassment run in the Greenspan family and a genetic mutation disorder .

    The entire Greenspan family harassed the entire neighborhood of Shaker Heights for 6 years and the poor taxpayers had to split the bill. It seems to me that Neil and Judi Greenspan felt the police should babysit their son. Judi Greenspan didn’t feel it was her responsibility to control her son. The entire town put a stop to this after 6 long years by charging the Greenspan $6, 500 in nuisance fees. I’m reading the Reddit Blog and ThinkComp (Aaron Greenspan) is turning the story around and seems to be saying the Greenscum family are the victims because the entire town hates them. After speaking with Arron Greenspan on the phone a few times this all makes sense. The Greenscums are an entire family of a Psychopath’s. They’re great liars, they have zero regards for others, they’re not receptive to punishments, They won’t take responsibility for their wrongdoings and are aggressive. I fear for my life because Aaron Greenspan made threats to me. I had to change my phone number a few times. I have no idea who Aaron keeps getting my new phone number. Aaron GreenSCUM will call me with dumb questions. I have left voice messages on his phone. His voice message “says you are being recorded”. Aaron Greespan can’t is this dumb. I wonder how many years this will go on and the number of people he will hurt. This piece of manure is out of his mind. I want to punch the wall every time I get turned down for a job because I know Aaron Greenspan is to be blamed. Aaron Greenspan said he will sue me.

    http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/08/simon_greenspans_plight_raises.html

    12 Votes
  • Ou
    out the Sock Puppets! Aug 11, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan aka "Sock puppet" aka sneaky Sock puppet.

    Aaron Greenspan has been using the sock puppet name "John Fuenchem" to harass and stalk the entire members who run the legitimate non-profit website CourtListener.com for a couple o years now. Sock puppet aka Aaron Greenspan is a very jealous and envious sneak who wants full control over the downloading of people's legal documents. Aaron Greenspan has to rely on CourtListener.com for his legal documents downloads.

    Aaron Greensan has all kinds of fake identities, aliases and sockpuppets to try and fake people out, as he thinks he's more clever than everyone else.

    Sock puppet aka Aaron Greenspan is using the sock puppet alias "randy123789" on complaints board and is even making up bad and vulgar reviews about himself using his hacking skills to set people up. This Aaron Greenspan is a danger to society.

    Another Sock puppet of this schemer Aaron Greenspan is the following user name "bcboncs". Aaron Greenspan answers on Reddit.com with his Sock puppet name "bcboncs" then simultaneously answers again with his usual user name "thinkcorp". This Aaron Greenspan is mentally unstable.

    The following is a comment from the Reddit.com user "Earzitz":
    Earzitz
    1 point
    ·
    1 month ago
    And bcboncs is Aaron Greenspan in disguise. Aaron Greenspan sued facebook and LOST. He sued Google and LOST and he sued the United States Government and LOST! He's sued half of silicon Valley and LOST!! Aaron Greenspan is a LOSER! No attorney will represent Aaron because he files frivilous lawsuits. The Judges should Sanction Aaron Greenspan for filing frivilous lawsuit.
    Aaron Greenspan was a problem child growing up. He was both physically and mentally abusive to his younger brother who has down syndrome, Simon Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan has a mean streak in him. He had pyschological problems as a child. In his adult life his psychological problems have worsened and he was diagnosed as sociopath. Aaron stalks people, strangers he doesn't know. He finds their personal information and posts their personal lives and personal documents on his website for only one purpose, to try and ruin their lives and destroy them.
    Aaron's other reddit account is thinkcomp. Aaron Greenspan is the MOST HATED MAN ON THE UNIVERSE. Aaron Greenspan was also arrested on felony criminal charges. He doesn't follow the law. He makes his own laws. He also never graduated college. Aaron Greenspan is a patholocical liar.
    Aaron Greenspan thinks up weird outrageous stories in his head. He hears voices. He told the police that somebody made a death threat. LOL. Aaron Greenspan is a damn weirdo!! WEIRDO!! WEIRDO! WEIRDO!
    Share
    Save

    Here is another user from Reddit.com:

    10 days ago
    Earzitz How did you know that Aaron Greenspan uses a disguise. Recently reported in a few posts that Aaron was using the name John Fuenchem. I recently asked to court case removed from Plainsite.org and search engines. Aaron Greenspan just laughed at me and degraded me. He has been stalking me and calling me with questions. Aaaron called and harrassed other people that were mentioned in my court case.
    I wonder how Aaron Greenspan feels now that the joke is on him . He has personally tormented over a 100 thousand people and got away with it. Read the article about Aaron Greenspan using a fake name. Be aware, their is a class action suit against Plainsite, Think Computer Foundation and Think Computer Corporation. Its really Aaron Greenspan trying to figure all of his victims that are speaking out.
    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    Here is the Reddit.com user "Earzitz" again who appears to know exactly what Aaron Greenspan is up to with all his Sock puppets.
    level 5
    Earzitz
    1 point
    ·
    2 days ago
    Got it. Aaron makes up fake profile names on all these message boards and pretends he is putting together a class action lawsuit against himself. He made a new email and then he tries to get people to email him. He's so deranged and psychotic that he also talks to them in his other personality. Aaron has a few fake profiles on complaintsboard.com .

    The following is the racist Aaron Greenspan using his Sock puppet "bcboncs" to respond just like Aaron Greenspan always responds with this air of know it all arrogance.level 8
    bcboncs
    1 point
    ·
    1 day ago
    You'll need to stop getting paid by MM and move outside India to get a life.

    The following is the Sock puppet "bcboncs" aka Aaron Greenspan outing himself like the angry Sock puppet that he is.

    myersny
    3 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    Some more
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/aaron-greenspan-a-k-a-aaron-jacob-greenspan-owner-of-vicious-monetized-plainsiteorg-hacker-and-online-harassment-and-stalking-c989814.html
    Its does sounds shady. Seems Aaron Greenspan has a few business and running then under a fake charity to avoid paying the IRS. In the tipoff report Aaron Greenspan says he never received any money. But the 990 form shows Aaron Greenspan received 250k.
    The charity has the some addresss as keen promotions.
    Keene Promotions, Inc 20560 Shelburne Rd Beachwood, OH 44122
    Share
    Save

    level 2
    myersny
    3 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    Here are the IRS 990 forms for think computer Foundation and Aaron Greenspan mentioned in rippoff report he had never received any donations. Where did he get the 250000 from and how did Aaron Greenspan use the money?? Aaron sells computer software and crm to business.
    Share
    Save

    level 1
    myersny
    3 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    ·
    edited 1 month ago
    This jury is still out this guy. Aaron Greenspan took Kaiser to court over a $10 co-pay. Aaron J Greenspan represented himself. Ruling came down from a judge he is not allowed to represent himself. This guy really has a ton of nutty lawsuits. Glad we agree that Aaron Jacob Greenspan mentally unstable. Dr. Neil S Greenspan of case western reserve university and Judi Greenspan of Keene promotions agree also.
    Share
    Save

    level 1
    Zuck051484
    2 points
    ·
    3 months ago
    You dont want this little child on the show. I wouldn't call this deranged lunatic a man. He is going to end up in prison by the end of the year. Huge class action suit coming for him.
    Share
    Save

    level 2
    bcboncs
    1 point
    ·
    3 months ago
    A month late but who are you referring to? Greenspan??
    Share
    Save

    level 3
    Zuck051484
    1 point
    ·
    3 months ago
    Google Aaron Greenspan plainsite.org. He has ruined the lives of many people by posting private information and refuses to remove it. Now the tables have turned and he is being reported for tax fraud.
    Share
    Save

    level 4
    bcboncs
    1 point
    ·
    3 months ago
    Initial searches prove this to not be the case but it's not really worth the effort to debate. Other priorities.
    Share
    Save

    level 5
    Zuck051484
    1 point
    ·
    3 months ago
    I don't even care but here are the documents that led to fraud.
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/aaron-greenspan-a-k-a-aaron-jacob-greenspan-owner-of-vicious-monetized-plainsiteorg-hacker-and-online-harassment-and-stalking-c989814.html
    Share
    Save

    level 6
    bcboncs
    1 point
    ·
    3 months ago
    I appreciate this but that's just a complaint board and okay sure so he's evading taxes. Even if guilty, that doesn't lead to your previous claims.
    Share
    Save

    level 1
    myersny
    1 point
    ·
    1 month ago
    Great link zuck. This Aaron Greenspan sounds like a real nut. I googled Aaron Greenspan and found out he has some stds. I also read that Aaron Greenspan owns Think computer Foundation plainsite.org plainsite and his father neil Greenspan is professor at case western reserve university. Aaron J Greenspan is running a fraudulent charity.
    http://www.stdregistry.com/aaron-greenspan-aaron-j-greenspan-think-computer-corporation-aaron-greenspan-settlement-aaron-greenspan-new-worth-aaron-greenspan-reddit-aaron-greenspan-wiki-aaron-greenspan-harvard-aaron-greens-35.html
    Share
    Save

    level 2
    bcboncs
    2 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    Great job deducing something 3 months ago and even better judging him on STDs. Nice one!
    Share
    Save

    level 3
    myersny
    1 point
    ·
    1 month ago
    I agree, this post about Aaron Greenspan is really horrible. Here are some more about Aaron Greenspan http://www.stdregistry.com/neil-s-greenspan-neil-greenspan-case-western-reserve-university-2.html
    Share
    Save

    level 4
    myersny
    2 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    Here are so other sites. I read about about Aaron Greenspan pops is professor and Dr. Neil S Greenspan at case western reserve university. His mother Judi Greenspan sounds also shady from these charities. What can we do to help this guy? Aaron Greenspan is really smart from creating Facebook and Facecash. Does he really have STDs.
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/aaron-greenspan-aka-aaron-jacob-greenspan-plainsiteorg-plainsiteorg-under-fraudulent-501c-think-computer-censor-father-neil-s-greenspan-is-the-vp-and-treasurer-c959688.html
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/wwwplainsiteorg-aaron-jacob-greenspan-aaron-jacob-greenspan-posting-personal-and-private-information-on-his-website-c849789.html?page=2
    https:///link removed/
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/aaron-sociopath-greenspan-plainsiteorg-plainsiteorg-under-illegal-501c-think-computer-his-father-neil-sociopath-greenspan-is-the-vp-and-treasurer-c959670.html
    https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/aaron-greenspan-judith-greenspan-neil-greenspan-plainsiteorg-complaint-aaron-greenspan-judith-greenspan-neil-greenspan-plainsiteorg-complaint-c993572.html
    Share
    Save

    level 4
    Earzitz
    2 points
    ·
    1 month ago
    (1 child)

    level 3
    Earzitz
    1 point
    ·
    1 month ago
    And bcboncs is Aaron Greenspan in disguise. Aaron Greenspan sued facebook and LOST. He sued Google and LOST and he sued the United States Government and LOST! He's sued half of silicon Valley and LOST!! Aaron Greenspan is a LOSER! No attorney will represent Aaron because he files frivilous lawsuits. The Judges should Sanction Aaron Greenspan for filing frivilous lawsuit.
    Aaron Greenspan was a problem child growing up. He was both physically and mentally abusive to his younger brother who has down syndrome, Simon Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan has a mean streak in him. He had pyschological problems as a child. In his adult life his psychological problems have worsened and he was diagnosed as sociopath. Aaron stalks people, strangers he doesn't know. He finds their personal information and posts their personal lives and personal documents on his website for only one purpose, to try and ruin their lives and destroy them.
    Aaron's other reddit account is thinkcomp. Aaron Greenspan is the MOST HATED MAN ON THE UNIVERSE. Aaron Greenspan was also arrested on felony criminal charges. He doesn't follow the law. He makes his own laws. He also never graduated college. Aaron Greenspan is a patholocical liar.
    Aaron Greenspan thinks up weird outrageous stories in his head. He hears voices. He told the police that somebody made a death threat. LOL. Aaron Greenspan is a damn weirdo!! WEIRDO!! WEIRDO! WEIRDO!

    3 Votes
  • Ww
    www.thinkcomputer.org Aug 14, 2018

    Robert Ambrogi is a brave man for outing Aaron Greenspan for using the name John Fuenchem. Aaron Greenspan had been staking me for 3 years and others foryears.

    Now Aaron Greenspan is going to stalk Robert Ambrogi. You should expect atleast 1 call per month. It's pretty funny when Aaron calls pretending he is a mafia boss.

    11 Votes
  • Ma
    Masood 1 Aug 14, 2018

    I came across this podcast of Aaron Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan sounds voice sounds like a robot and seems like a sociopath.

    https://quoththeraven.podbean.com/e/quoth-the-raven-54-aaron-greenspan-creator-of-the-first-harvard-face-book/

    Quoth the Raven #54 - Aaron Greenspan, Creator of the First Harvard “Face Book”
    July 28, 2018
    Aaron Greenspan is the self-proclaimed missing piece from the Facebook story as it has been documented in films like "The Social Network". He joins me on my podcast to talk about his role in creating the first "Face Book", why he thinks Mark Zuckerberg is a "sociopath" and "threat to national security", Facebook's most recent scandal, the stock's recent plunge, and why he believes the number of Facebook fake accounts are understated.

    Aaron is an entrepreneur and engineer with a background in enterprise software. He is the President & CEO of Think Computer Corporation (http://www.thinkcomputer.com), as well as the founder of Think Computer Foundation (http://www.thinkcomputer.org), a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Aaron has worked on engineering problems involving accounting, payments, and legal systems, among others. Though not a lawyer, he has represented himself and his company before several state and federal courts, as well as the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

    Aaron has an A.B. in Economics from Harvard College and is the author of a memoir about his time there, during which he developed the predecessor to The Facebook.

    Aaron also contributes to legal website PlainSite. In addition to making huge volumes of data accessible to the public free of charge, PlainSite lets ordinary citizens impact the law-making process.

    Follow him on Twitter @PlainSite and @AaronGreenspan

    If you enjoy the QTR podcast - which will always be free - please consider an extremely small recurring donation through Patreon. My link is here. Thank you guys: https://www.patreon.com/QTRResearch

    All content created and owned by Quoth the Raven Research, LLC.

    All podcast content is subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.quoththeravenresearch.com/disclaimerterms-of-service/

    THIS IS NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE

    Disclosures: QTR has no position, Aaron owns Facebook puts

    Visit www.quoththeravenresearch.com for more on QTR.

    14 Votes
  • Ma
    Masood 1 Aug 14, 2018

    This is disgusting. Aaron Greenspan made a profile to find a boyfriend. Look at this link. He looks craaaaaaaazy .

    https://reportcheater.com/aaron-greenspan-plainsite-org/

    16 Votes
  • Mr
    Mrs. Jackson 4 Aug 15, 2018

    I work at the courthouse that Mr. Aaron frequently visits. Mr. Aaron is a huge pain in the behind and has made racist remarks to myself and other African American clerks. I hope he stops coming in and taking all ourtime. The boy seems to have schizophrenia. One time I walked away from my post and he had the nerve to go behind the counter and go through the electric files in the computer . He makes me so uncomfortable.

    16 Votes
  • Jo
    Jodi L Apr 30, 2019

    @Mrs. Jackson 4 Mrs. Jackson has hit it on the nail when she said, "The boy seems to have schizophrenia". Well, of course Aaron Greenspan has schizophrenia and he suffers from bouts of Psychotic events where he has burst of anger and cannot control himself. Aaron Greenspan is a dangerous individual and if he had access to fire Nukes he would do it, that's how insane this guy is. Anything in the hands of Aaron Greenspan can be looked at as a dangerous weapon. Currently he is using his Hacking and Computer skills as his present dangerour weapon. Because he suffers from schizophrenia one cannot reason with this insane individual. Aaron Greenspan is in dire need of some serious Pscyhiatric Help.

    13 Votes
  • Q3
    q39g5r7938phr May 23, 2019
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Mrs. Jackson 4 CHAPTER IX.

    POULTRY.
    Choice varieties of fowls add a pleasant feature to the farm premises. They engage the attention and sympathy of the juvenile farmers, and the time bestowed in the poultry yard keeps them from mischief: it is an agreeable and salutary relief from toil and study, and elicits the taste, the judgment, and the kindlier feelings of humanity, which are to be matured in the future accomplished breeder. When properly managed, poultry are a source of considerable profit, yielding more for the food they consume, than any other stock, although their value is not often considered. The agricultural statistics of the United States, for 1839, give us over $12, 000, 000 in poultry, and it probably exceeds $15, 000, 000 at the present time. It is estimated by McQueen, that the poultry of England exceeds $40, 000, 000, and yet McCulloch says she imports 60, 000, 000 eggs annually from France, (McQueen states it at near 70, 000, 000;) and from other parts of the continent, 25, 000, 000; besides 80, 000, 000 imported from Ireland. Poultry, then, ceases to be an unimportant object of agricultural attention, and assumes its appropriate place among the other staples of the farmer.

    Hens
    Are the most numerous and profitable, and the most generally useful of the feathered tribe. The hen is peculiarly an egg-producing bird. She has the same predisposition for laying, that the cow has for secreting milk. Some breeds are better adapted for this object than others: but in all that have ever come within our notice, the proper food and circumstances are alone wanting, to produce a reasonable quantity of eggs.

    The egg consists of three distinct parts; the shell, the white, [Pg 215] and the yolk. A good-sized egg will weigh 1, 000 grains, of which about 107 are shell, 604 are white, and 289 are yolk. Of the shell, 97 per cent. is carbonate of lime, 1 per cent. phosphate of lime and magnesia, and 2 per cent. albumen. The white consists of 12 per cent. of albumen, 2.7 of mucus, 0.3 of salts, and 85 of water. The yolk has about 17.4 per cent. of albumen, 28.6 of yellow oil, 54 of water, with a trace of sulphur and phosphorus.

    The foregoing are the constituents of eggs, which have been formed when the bird has free access to the various articles which constitute her natural food. But they vary with circumstances. When full-fed and denied all access to lime, she will form an egg without the shell, and deliver it enclosed in the membrane or sack which always surrounds the white, when covered by the shell. When scantily fed, they will frequently lay; but from a deficiency of nutriment, the egg will be meager and watery, and possess but a small portion of the nutritious qualities peculiar to them.

    To produce the largest number of good eggs, several conditions are important; and they must especially have an abundance of the right kind of food. This is the most readily obtained in part from animal food. In warm weather, when they have a free range, they can generally supply their wants in the abundance of insects, earth-worms, and other animal matters within their reach. The large proportion of albumen contained in their eggs, requires that much of their food should be highly nitrogenized, and when they cannot procure this in animal matter, it must be given in grains containing it.

    If to the usual qualities of hens, a breed of peculiar elegance, of graceful form, and beautiful plumage, be added, together with entire adaptation to the economical purposes required, good layers and good carcass, we have a combination of utility, luxury, and taste in this bird, which should commend them as general favorites. They can everywhere be kept with advantage, except in dense cities. A hen that costs a shilling or two, if provided with a suitable range, will consume 30 or 40 cents worth of food, and produce from 80 to 150 eggs per annum, worth three or four times the cost of feed and attention.

    The Food
    Of hens may consist of different kinds of grain, either broken, ground, or cooked; roots, and especially boiled potatoes, are nutritious and economical; green herbage as clover and most[Pg 216] of the grasses, chickweed, lettuce, cabbage, &c., will supply them with much of their food, if fresh and tender.

    Fig. 40, is a Food fountain. The grain is placed in the hopper, which is closely covered, and the grain falls into the bottom below. It is accessible on four sides by spring doors, which are thrown open by the weight of the fowl on the connecting spring. One is shown as opened by the fowl in stepping up to feed. This is a protection against dirt and vermin.

    Fig. 40.
    Food Fountain.
    Though not absolutely essential to them, yet nothing contributes so much to their laying, as unsalted, animal food. This is a natural aliment, as is shown by the avidity with which they pounce on every fly, insect, or earth-worm which comes within their reach. It would not of course pay to supply them with valuable flesh, but the blood and offal of the slaughter-houses, refuse meat of all kinds, and especially the scraps or cracklings to be had at the inciters' shops, after soaking for a few hours in warm water, is one of the best and most economical kinds of food. Such with boiled meal is a very fattening food. Grain is at all times best for them when cooked, as they will lay more, fatten quicker, and eat much less when fed to them in this state; and it may be thus used unground, with the same advantage to the fowls as if first crushed, as their digestive organs are certain to extract the whole nutriment. All grain is good for them, including millet, rice, the oleaginous seeds, as the sun-flower, flax, hemp, &c. It is always better to afford them a variety of[Pg 217] grains where they can procure them at their option, and select as their appetite craves.

    They are also fond of milk, and especially when it has become curdled; and indeed scarcely any edible escapes their notice. They carefully pick up most of the waste garbage around the premises, and glean much of their subsistence from what would otherwise become offensive; and by their destruction of innumerable insects and worms, they render great assistance to the gardener. Of course their ever-busy propensity for scratching, is indiscriminately indulged just after the seeds have been sown and while the plants are young, which renders it necessary that they be confined in some close yard for a time; yet this should be as capacious as possible.

    Fig. 41.
    Water Fountain.
    Water is placed in the cask as represented in the Fig., and it is then closely stopped, except an opening through a tube leading into a vessel below. As the water is exhausted from this, it descends from the cask above, and a supply is thus at all times within reach of the poultry.

    Their food is better when given to them warm, not hot, and there should always be a supply before them to prevent gorging. It is better to be placed on shelves or suspended boxes or hoppers, which are variously and cheaply constructed, to keep it clean and out of the reach of rats. Besides their food, hens ought to be at all times abundantly supplied with clean water, egg or pounded oyster shells, old mortar or slacked lime. If not allowed to run at large, where they can[Pg 218] help themselves, they must also be furnished with gravel to assist their digestion; and a box or bed of ashes, sand, and dust, is equally essential to roll in for the purpose of ridding themselves of vermin.

    Fig. 42.
    Poultry House
    The Hen-house
    May be constructed in various ways to suit the wishes of the owner, and when tastefully built it is an ornament to the premises, It should be perfectly dry throughout, properly lighted, and capable of being made tight and warm in winter, yet afford all the ventilation desirable at any season. In this, arrange the nests in boxes on the sides, in such a manner as to humor the instinct of the hen for concealment when she resorts to them. When desirable to set the hen, these nests may be so placed as to shut out the others, yet open into another yard or beyond the enclosure, so that they can take an occasional stroll and help themselves to food, &c. This prevents other hens laying in their nests, while setting; and it may be easily managed, by having their boxes placed on the wall of[Pg 219] the building, with a moveable door made to open on either side at pleasure. Hens will lay equally well without a nest-egg, but when broken up, they ramble off and form new nests, if they are not confined. They will lay if kept from the cock, but it is doubtful if they will thus yield as many eggs. Hens disposed to set at improper times, should be dismissed from the common yard, so as to be out of reach of the nests, and plentifully fed till weaned from this inclination.

    Fig. 43.
    Egg-Hatcher, or Eccalobeon.
    Fig. 43 represents an egg-hatcher or Eccalobeon, made of different sizes, with shelves so arranged as to hold from 200 to 800 eggs without touching each other. The outer box is a non-conductor, so as to retain the heat conveyed to every part by water tubes, connected by a reservoir below, the bottom of which is heated by the flame from a spirit-lamp. The temperature is indicated by a thermometer on the door inside, which should be made equal to that of the hen, say about 106° Fahrenheit. Her natural temperature is somewhat elevated by the feverish condition of the bird at the period of incubation.

    Chickens require to be kept warm and dry, for a few days after hatching, and they may be fed with hard-boiled eggs, crumbs of bread or pudding, and milk or water, and allowed to scratch in the gravel in front of the hen, which should be confined in a coop for the first three or four weeks. After[Pg 220] this, they may be turned loose, when they will thrive on any thing the older ones eat. Many use them for the table when they are but a few weeks old; but they are unfit for this purpose, till they have attained full maturity.

    The white-legs are preferred by some, from the whiteness and apparent delicacy of the meat; but the yellow-legged are the richest and most highly-flavored. The color of the feathers does not seem to affect the quality of the flesh or their character for laying. If we consider the chemical principles of the absorption and retention of heat, we should assume the white coat to be best, as it is coolest in summer when exposed to the sun, and warmest in winter. Yet some of the white breeds are delicate, and do not bear rough usage or exposure.

    Fig. 44.
    The Dorking
    Varieties.
    These differ materially in their sizes, shapes, and colors.

    The Dorking is esteemed one of the best, being large, well formed and hardy, good layers and nurses, and yielding an excellent carcass. They are both white and speckled, and generally have five toes.

    The Poland is both white and black, with a large tuft, [Pg 221] generally of white feathers, on the head. They are of good size, and excellent layers, but are seldom inclined to set, which makes them peculiarly desirable for such as wish eggs only.

    The Dominique is a speckled fowl, of barely medium size, compact, hardy, good layers, and valuable for the table. The Bucks county fowls, heretofore principally reared near Philadelphia, possess but moderate pretensions to notice, except in their immense size, a brace of capons having been fattened to 19¼ lbs. when dressed.

    Fig. 45.
    The Bantam.
    The Bantam is but little larger than a pigeon, and is usually of a pure white, but is sometimes speckled. It is generally feathered to the toes, but may be bred with clean legs. It is very domestic, and a pleasant little bird around the premises, and is not unprofitable. The Game cock is of medium weight, and yields good flesh, but is a poor layer, and an undesirable tenant for the farm-yard. Besides these, there are many fanciful varieties, as the Creeper, with excessively short legs; the Rumpless, without a tail; the Frizzled, with irregular feathers turned towards the head; the Silky or Merino fowl, with brown or buff down, instead of feathers; the Negro, with its black crest, wattles, skin, legs, and feathers; the Java and Cochin China, of great size; several varieties of the Top-knot, and others.[Pg 222]

    The Diseases of Hens.
    These are not numerous or complicated, and may be mostly avoided by proper treatment and food, which are indicated with sufficient minuteness in the foregoing observations.

    Gapes or Pip is generally owing to drinking unwholesome or dirty water. Remove the white blister on the tip of the tongue, and wash with sharp vinegar, diluted with warm water; or compel the bird to swallow a large lump of fresh butter, mixed with Scotch snuff. It has been cured by opening the mouth and forcing a pigeon feather, with a tuft of the feathers left on the end, (the others having been stripped off, ) down the windpipe, and gently turning it as withdrawn, to be repeated the following day if necessary. This detaches large numbers of a slender red worm, collected in the larynx of the throat, which impedes respiration and swallowing. A little spirits of turpentine mixed with the food is a preventive; as are also clean, whitewashed premises, and good food. After these attacks, feed for a few days with light food, soaked bran and cabbage, or lettuce chopped fine.

    Roup, Catarrh, or swelled head, is shown by feverish symptoms, swollen eyelids, frequently terminating in blindness, rattling in the throat, and temporary strangulation. These are accompanied with a highly offensive watery discharge, from the mouth and nostrils, loss of appetite, and much thirst. They should be placed near the fire; their head bathed in warm Castile soap-suds, or milk and water. Stimulating food, as flour or barley-meal, mustard and grated ginger, mixed and forced down the throat, Boswell says, has been effectual in their speedy restoration. This, like many other diseases, is contagious, and when it appears, the bird should be at once separated from the flock.

    Flux is cured by the yolk of an egg boiled hard; and boiled barley soaked in wine.

    Costiveness is removed by giving bran and water with a little honey; or give a small dose of castor oil.

    Vermin are destroyed by giving them clean sand and ashes to roll in, adding a little quicklime if necessary.

    Entire cleanliness is necessary for the avoidance of this and other diseases. A perfectly dry range is also essential, nor should there be too many together, as this is a fruitful source of disease.[Pg 223]

    THE TURKEY.
    This bird was unknown to the civilized world till the discovery of this Continent. It was found here both in its wild and domesticated state; and still occupies the whole range of the western hemisphere, though the wild turkey disappears as the country becomes settled. The wild is larger than the domesticated bird, sometimes weighing over 30 lbs. dressed. The color of the male is generally a greenish brown, approaching to black, and of a rich, changeable, metallic lustre. The hen is marked somewhat like the cock, but with duller hues. Domestication through successive generations dims the brilliancy of their plumage, and lessens their size and hardiness. It also produces a variety of colors, though they are mostly of a black, buff, pure white, or speckled.

    They give evidence of the comparative recency of their domestication, in the instinct which frequently impels the cock to brood and take care of the young. Nothing is more common than for the male bird to supply the place of the hen, when any accident befalls her, and to bring up a family of young chicks with an equally instinctive regard for their helplessness and safety.

    The flesh of this bird, both wild and tame, is exceedingly delicate and palatable; and though not possessing the high game flavor of some of the smaller wild-fowl, and especially of the aquatic, as the canvass-back duck, &c., it exceeds them in its digestibility and healthfulness. The turkey is useful principally for its flesh, as it seldom lays over a nest-full of eggs in one season, when they brood on these and bring up their young. If full-fed, and their first eggs are withdrawn from them, they frequently lay a second time.

    Breeding.
    Those intended for breeders should be compact, vigorous, and large, without being long-legged. They should be daily, yet lightly fed through the winter, on grain and roots, and some animal food is always acceptable and beneficial to them. They are small eaters, and without caution will soon get too fat. One vigorous male will suffice for a flock of 10 or 12 hens, and a single connection is sufficient for each. They begin to lay on the approach of warm weather, laying once a day, or every other day, till they have completed their litter; which in the young or indifferently fed, may be 10 or 12, and[Pg 224] in the older ones, sometimes reaches 20. The hen is sly in secreting her nest, but usually selects a dry, well-protected place. She is an inveterate setter, and carefully hatches most of her eggs.

    The young may be allowed to remain for 24 hours without eating, then fed with hard-boiled eggs made fine, or crumbs of wheat bread. Boiled milk, curds, and buttermilk afford an excellent food. As they get stronger, oat or barley-meal is suitable, but Indian-meal, uncooked, is hurtful to them when quite young. They are very tender, and will bear neither cold nor wet, and it is of course necessary to confine the old one for the first few weeks. When able to shift for themselves, they may wander over the fields at pleasure; and from their great fondness for insects, they will rid the meadows of innumerable grasshoppers, bugs, and beetles, which often do incalculable damage to the farmer. Early chickens are sufficiently grown to fatten the latter part of autumn or the beginning of winter, which is easily done on any of the grains or boiled roots. Both are better for being cooked. They require a higher roosting-place than hens, and are impatient of too close confinement, preferring the ridge of a barn, or a lofty tree, to the circumscribed limits of the ordinary poultry-house. When rightly managed and fed, turkeys are subject to few maladies; and even these, careful attention will soon remove.

    THE PEACOCK AND GUINEA-HEN.
    The Peacock is undoubtedly the most showy of the feathered race. It is a native of the southern part of Asia, and is still found wild in the islands of Java and Ceylon, and some parts of the interior of Africa. They are an ornament to the farm premises, and are useful in destroying reptiles, insects, and garbage; but they are quarrelsome in the poultry-yard, and destructive in the garden. Their flesh is coarse and dark, and they are worthless as layers. The brilliant silvery green and their ever-varying colors give place to an entire white, in one of the varieties.

    The Guinea-hen is a native of Africa and the southern part of Asia, where it abounds in its wild state. Most of them are beautifully and uniformly speckled; but occasionally they are white on the breast, like the Pintados of the West India Islands, and some are entirely white. They are unceasingly garrulous; and their excessively pugnacious character renders[Pg 225] them uncomfortable inmates with the other poultry. Their flesh, though high-colored, is delicate and palatable, but, like the peacock, they are indifferent layers. Both are natives of a warm climate, and the young are tender and rather difficult to rear. Neither of these birds is a general favorite, and we omit further notice of them.

    THE GOOSE.
    There are many varieties of the goose. Main enumerates twenty-two, most of which are wild; and the tame are again variously subdivided. The common white and gray are the most numerous and profitable. The white Bremen is much larger, often weighing over 20 lbs. net. It is of a beautiful snowy plumage, is domestic and reared without difficulty, though not as prolific and hardy as the former. The China Goose is smaller than the gray, and one of the most beautiful of the family, possessing much of the gracefulness and general appearance of the swan. It is prolific and tolerably hardy, but has not thus far been a successful rival with the first. The Guinea or African goose is the largest of the species, and equals the size of the swan, often dressing over 25 lbs. It is a majestic and graceful bird, and very ornamental to water scenery. Several other varieties are domesticated in the United States.

    Breeding.
    Geese pair frequently at one year old, and rear their young; but with some kinds, especially of the wild, this is deferred till two and sometimes three. They require a warm, dry place for their nests, and when undisturbed, they will sit steadily; and if the eggs have not been previously chilled or addled, they will generally hatch them all, if kept on the nest. To insure this, it is sometimes necessary to withdraw the first hatched, to prevent the old ones wandering before all are out. The young should be kept in a warm sheltered place till two or three weeks old, if the weather be cold or unsettled. The best food for the goslings, is barley or oat, or boiled Indian meal and bread. Milk is also good for them. They require green food, and are fond of lettuce, young clover, and fresh tender grass; and after a few weeks, if they have a free range on this, they will forage for themselves.

    Geese are not a profitable bird to raise, unless in places where they can procure their own subsistence, or at least[Pg 226] during the greater part of the year. This they are enabled to do, wherever there are extensive commons of unpastured lands, or where there are streams or ponds, lakes or marshes with shoal sedgy banks. In these, they will live and fatten throughout the year, if unobstructed by ice. They may be fed on all kinds of grain and edible roots, but it is more economical to give them their food cooked. The well-fattened gosling affords one of the most savory dishes for the table.

    Geese live to a great age. They have been known to exceed 100 years. If allowed a free range on good food and clean water, they will seldom get diseased. When well fed, they yield nearly a pound of good feathers in a season, at three or four pluckings; and the largest varieties even exceed this quantity.

    DUCKS
    Are more hardy and independent of attention than the goose, and they are generally the most profitable. They are omnivorous, and greedily eat every thing which will afford them nourishment, though they seldom forage on the grasses like the goose, when they can procure other food. They are peculiarly carnivorous, and devour all kinds of meat, putrid or fresh; and are especially fond of fish, and such insects, worms, and other creeping things, as they can find imbedded in the mud or elsewhere. They will often distend their crop with young frogs, almost to the ordinary size of their bodies. Their indiscriminate appetite often renders them unfit for the table, unless fattened out of the reach of garbage and offensive matters. An English admiral used to resort to well-fattened rats for his fresh meat when at sea, and justified his taste by saying, they were more cleanly feeders than ducks, which were general favorites.

    The most profitable for domestic use, is undoubtedly the common black duck. They lay profusely in the spring, when well fed, often producing 40 or 50 eggs, and sometimes a greater number, if kept from setting. They are much larger than those of the hen, and equally rich and nourishing, but far less delicate. They are careless in their habits, and generally drop their eggs wherever they happen to be through the night, whether in the water, the road, or farm-yard; and as might be expected from such prodigality of character, they are indifferent setters and nurses.

    The ducklings are better reared by setting the eggs under[Pg 227] a sedate, experienced hen, as the longer time necessary for hatching, requires patience in the foster-mother to develop the young chick. They should be confined for a few days, and away from the water. At first they may be fed with bread, or pudding made from boiled oat, barley, or Indian meal; and they soon acquire strength and enterprise enough to shift for themselves, if afterwards supplied with pond or river water. They are fit for the table when fully grown, and well fattened on clean grain. This is more economically accomplished by feeding it cooked.

    The varieties of ducks are almost innumerable. Main describes 31, and some naturalists number over 100. Besides the black duck above described, several others, as the light gray, the white duck, and some of the tufted, are prolific, hardy, and profitable.

    We omit further notice of other varieties; and of the swan, brant, pigeons, &c., as not profitable for general rearing, and only suited to ornamental grounds.

    0 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas Coleman Southern Cal May 24, 2019

    @Jodi L We thought the same thing when we first met him in 2009 that he either has Aspbergers or Schizophrenia, or maybe a combination of both. Asperbergers definitely. He doesn't seem to see anything wrong with himself and that is of a definite concern. If a person's mental illness is severe they usually do not realize that they are mentally ill. Sooner or later he will most likely be placed in an institution when he gets older.

    8 Votes
  • No
    Noel Tesla Sales Lover Aug 23, 2019

    @Jodi L Aaron Greenspan has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and Neil Greenspan also has paranoid schizophrenia. They are somewhat functional in society until things don’t go their way, then these two sickos show the public their psychosis breakdowns.
    Neil Greenspan has been somewhat mentally stable because he has routine with his job at Case Western Reserve University but when he went to the Tesla showroom with his mentally ill son Aaron Greenspan in Ohio they both had a Psychotic breakdown and Neil Greenspan was yelling at Tesla employees and claimed that he has all these connections to newspapers such as Huffpost and he went bezirk claiming both him and Aaron Greenspan are journalists “lol!” and they threatened to make up lies to the news media unless they received free brochures and other freebies. These individuals use intimidation, hot air threats, lies, extortions and other criminal behaviors to try and force people to give them what they eat. The public just needs to totally ignore these freaks and say the magic word to them “NO!” and watch Neil Greenspan and his crazier son Aaron Greenspan have a psychotic meltdown.
    Just say “NO!” To Neil Greenspan and Aaron Greenspan. Tell them to shove their credentials where the sun doesn’t shine and give them nothing but the answer “”NO!”.

    5 Votes
  • Ea
    East LA Bro! Aug 16, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan has been harassing Mike Lissner and Brian Carver and the entire Board Members who run courtlistene.com with his fake persona called "John Fuenchem". This is why when the people who run court listener.com ask John Fuenchem to call them and speak with them over the phone he refuses because they will all recognize that John Fuenchem is the sociopath Aaron Greenspan.

    Aaron Greenspan is such a sick sociopath that he had a someone else speak to a third party who pretended to be John Fuenchem, in order to keep going on with this fake persona. Aaron Greenspan is John Fuenchem.

    Aaron Greenspan has been harassing and stalking friends, associates and online followers by sending them messages regarding all the courtlisteners.com staff and throwing them under the bus with made up rumors, lies and threats and pretending that all of this is coming from John Fuenchem when Aaron Greenspan is behind all of this.

    Aaron Greenspan is so jealous of the Free Law Project that is run by courtlistener.com and he has to depend on court listener.com to be able to download all of his legal documents on people. Now court listener.com has gotten wise to the fact that John Fuenchem is the alias that Aaron Greenspan is using to harass and stalk them. Courtlistener.com wants to now charge Aaron Greenspan $500 to $1, 000 per months as he is making lots of money off of people's dirty laundry or better stated legal documents and we believe that is too low. Aaron Greenspan should be charged $10, 000 a month so he goes away and just people alone.

    Can you imagine what this sociopath Aaron Greenspan would do if more money was asked of him from courtlister.com? Aaron Greenspan would lose it, well already has lost it a long time ago but he would go totally insane and probably would not be able to control himself and would get quite aggressive with people. We hope that Aaron Greenspan does not have access to any firearms because this guy like someone said is like Adam Lanza a complete sociopath with psychotic tendencies that come out when under lots of stress.

    It must be because the US is so free that Aaron Greenspan has not been locked up in a mental health facility because that is where he belongs. People like Aaron Greenspan should not be roaming freely in society, as sooner or later this sociopath will physically harm people.

    Aaron Greenspan should be made to go work a regular job and doing something productive and not be allowed to even go near a computer or a smart phone.

    Its incredible that people still fall for all this guys lies and fantasy tales and ask him for anything. Aaron Greenspan is a sociopath who is pulling a fast one on just about everyone that he comes in contact with. Sociopath's know how to turn on the charm on and off and now how to lie and try and make you believe their tall tales.

    Aaron Greenspan is insane in the membrane.

    13 Votes
  • Ea
    East LA Bro! Aug 16, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is alos using an alias on Reddit.com to harass and stalk people with his fake person "bcboncs".
    Everyone knows when Aaron Greenspan appears with his fake aliases because he cannot help himself and lets it rip with his aggressive writings and when people start to insult Aaron Greenspan online, then mysteriously these different aliases show up like John Fuenchem and bcboncs who for some strange reason step in to defend Aaron Greenspan and the way they write are the exact same way that Aaron Greenspan writes. He writes like a megalomaniac sociopath.

    14 Votes
  • Aaron Greenspan aka Huge Sociopath and escaped mental patient is using the following aliases here on Complaints Board, "randy123789", "Jose911" and many others that this sick Sociopath uses to harass and stalk people.

    Aaron Greenspan has been harassing and stalking the Free Law Project that runs court listener.com for years now, as this is where this Sociopath downloads all of his legal documents on people. Courtlistener.com needs to cut Aaron Greenspan completely off from any further access to court listener.com's legal downloading, as he is using all of this information on the public to make easy money, harass, stalk and shame people. Courtlistener.com could be financially liable for allowing a known Sociopath like Aaron Greenspan access to all of this sensitive legal information. Courtlister.com needs to tell Aaron Greenspan to take a hike once and for all and charge him $100, 000 per month to this access. Yes, $100, 000 per month so he gets lost and goes back to Ohio or wherever this Sociopath came from. We don't want this troublemaker Sociopath here in Silicon Valley, as he just wants to sue everybody to get free money for sitting on his lazy butt hacking everyone's computers. Why isn't Aaron Greenspan is prison? That's where this Sociopath belongs. People here in Silicon Valley all know that Aaron Greenspan is an Insane Sociopath and are actually afraid of him because he behaves worst than an actual criminal.

    Courtlistener.com please stop letting Aaron Greenspan aka Insane Sociopath access legal documents with the Free Law Project. Have Aaron Greenspan go to Pacer and pay for everything out of his own pocket, or have him pay $15.00 a month to get some free documents but definitely stop this Insane Sociopath from accessing the public's legal documents, as you are putting the public at risk of being ruined by this Insane Sociopath. Aaron Greenspan is downloading the public's legal documents for sinister motives only. Nothing that Aaron Greenspan does is for "Free". That is a big joke and a put on. Aaron Greenspan sells private advertising for plainsite.org, drives traffic to plainsite.org using negative legal documents and even charges exorbitant subscription fees for legal information that he says is "Free". In Aaron Greenspan's world the only one that is supposed to get everything for free is this Insane Sociopath that he then turns around and charges money for and makes tens of thousands of dollars per months off of people's misery, while harassing and stalking all the people who work for court listener.com using his fake alias "John Fuenchem". Yes, Aaron Greenspan is the alias "John Fuenchem" who has been harassing and stalking the entire Board Members of courtlistener.com by hacking in to their social media accounts and then going to those people that are associated with all the people who run courtlistener.com to defame and slander them all, because he is a jealous, envious, cheapskate who is angry that he alone cannot run the Free Law Project and get all these legal documents for free, so he can make more and more money for doing nothing.

    Aaron Greenspan needs to go work at BK and find out what work is really all about, instead of sitting in his air conditioned apartment, harassing, stalking and hacking people's computers, emails, social media accounts and servers.

    Aaron Greenspan believes in his Insane mind that he is better and smarter than the rest of the population because he knows how to be a Hacker.

    13 Votes
  • @Aaron Greenspan enemy of Silicon Valley Well said on every point. The entrie Free Law Project board is afraid Crazy Aaron Greenspan . Why might you ask? Its because they dont have the funds to put a pacifier (or a huge penis) in mouth to shut him up. Pacer and Free law project knew for a very long time that Aaron Greenspan is a hacker and looked the other way.

    12 Votes
  • Jo
    Jodi L Apr 30, 2019

    @Aaron Greenspan plainsite is mental Aliases that Aaron Greenspan uses on social media to harass people:
    bcboncs, thinkcomp and others on Reddit.com
    Randy123789, Lauri.R.7. and many others on complaintsboard.com
    JohnFuenchem an alias that Aaron Greenspan has used for quite some time to harass and stalk the Free Law Project in San Francisco.
    [email protected], Aaron Greenspan uses this email to try and get dummies to donate and send him money to this email account that is linked up to PayPal. Plainsite.org is not a 501(c)(3). We know because we called the IRS and were told this.
    Aaron Greenspan has just too many fake social media accounts on Twitter and many other sites.

    9 Votes
  • Th
    Thomas Coleman Southern Cal May 24, 2019

    @Aaron Greenspan plainsite is mental He is the alias John Fuenchem and we all know it even though he will lie and deny it. That's all he does is lie and he's a pro at lying.

    7 Votes
  • Do
    Don't let cancer spread! Aug 21, 2018

    Well, Free Law Project it never pays to the look the other way because sooner or later a Cyber Bully like Aaron Greenspan will always attack everyone around him. Its only a matter of time. Aaron Greenspan is a jealous, envious, vindictive, vicious hater who is a Mudslinger "A person who makes malicious or scandalous allegations about an opponent wit the aim of damaging their reputation." You cannot give Aaron Greenspan an inch because he will take advantage of you and will want to take everything away from you that you have worked for.

    When it comes to a Aaron Greenspan aka Mudslinger it never pays to be nice and passive with this type of personality. With Aaron Greenspan one cannot be on the defensive. One must be on the offensive, as soon as possible. That means that one has to immediately detach, disassociate and defuse themselves from this insane person. The sooner the better. The longer one waits to get this Sociopath Aaron Greenspan out of their lives the worst things will get, as Aaron Greenspan gains access to people's information and at first will behave all nice and charming and them will attack with full force to ruin a company or person. One can never even let it get that far.

    Nobody should do business with Aaron Greenspan, communicate with Aaron Greenspan, give money to Aaron Greenspan, respond to Aaron Greenspan and when Aaron Greenspan starts using aliases like John Fuenchem then its time to take immediate legal action to not have Aaron Greenspan communicate, harass and stalk that person or persons, or anyone associated with the people that Aaron Greenspan is harassing, stalking and shaming. The key is not to wait at all and take immediate legal action, or things will just keep getting worst with this Sociopath.

    One has to cut off all communication with Aaron Greenspan and completely ignore him. Aaron Greenspan will lash out and do his Mudslinging tactics and we all know that Aaron Greenspan is the one behind all these insane tactics. So, one has to start filing Law Enforcement complaints immediately and keep a paper trail, so when the day comes that Aaron Greenspan blows his fuse and does something really bad, then you will have a paper trail of Law Enforcement complaints. A Sociopath knows how to turn the charm on and off at his will and knows how to lie in a person's face, while looking straight in a person's eyes and this describes the Sociopath Aaron Greenspan.

    With a Sociopath like Aaron Greenspan one can never look the other way because sooner or later he will bite the hand that feeds him, which is courtlistener.com an Pacer. Pacer is well aware of Aaron Greenspan's criminal exploits when it comes to unlocking sealed cases and throwing the most negative cases online to drive more traffic to his Hacker site plainsite.org.

    Pacer should be sued for just allowing any nut to gain access to all these legal documents for the sole purpose of one individual to make some easy money and live it up off of people's dirty laundry.
    Pacer in Texas has been contacted many times and they have all the proof of Sociopath Aaron Greenspan's harassment, stalking and hacking. We don't understand why they haven't taken action against this individual.

    We will go full steam ahead with complaints to the IRS about all of this abuse, harassment and stalking. Believe it! Sociopath Aaron Greenspan when confronted by the IRS and Law Enforcement will snitch everyone out that has allowed him to have access to all these legal documents. Sociopath Aaron Greenspan won't even flinch when it comes to throwing courtlistener.com under the bus thinking he might be able to walk away from a dire situation with the IRS and Law Enforcement.

    The only way to deal with a Psychotic Hacker Sociopath such as Aaron Greenspan is to immediately without delay cut him off from all access to court documents, communications, do not respond to anything from this Sociopath. If one even starts responding to this Sociopath it just opens "Pandora's Box", as the saying goes. One has to simply cut everything off when it comes to Aaron Greenspan. If he harasses and stalks after cutting him off then one must immediately take legal action, including Police Complaints, DA Complaints and a Stay Away Order. Its the only thing that Sociopath Aaron Greenspan understands is when one stops him in his track with legal action. The key is not having any communication with this individual because he is always seeking to gain access to information in a sneaky manner using aliases such as John Fuenchem and many aliases as well.

    Remember: Zero contact with Aaron Greenspan is the best medicine so one has peace of mind and to stay out of trouble. Sooner or later Aaron Greenspan will turn on you no matter who you are. Aaron Greenspan makes sneaky attempts through hacking and other methods to gain access to people's dirt and then will try to blackmail and extort what he wants from them. The best thing to do is to not even start talking to Aaron Greenspan and if you are involved in any way with Aaron Greenspan then one needs to just take the losses and remove this Sociopath from your lives before he destroys your lives and your company's. Aaron Greenspan is like an aggressive cancer.

    12 Votes
  • Aarongreenspan Plainsite.org Facecash
    SUBMIT A COMPLAINT

    Internet Services aaron jacob greenspan posting personal and private information on his website.
    www.plainsite.org / Aaron Jacob Greenspan / aaron jacob greenspan posting personal and private information on his website.
    1
    500 RACE STREET, SUITE 4321, San Jose California 95126San Jose, CA, United States
    Review updated: Aug 17, 2018
    129 comments
    Contact information:
    Phone: 415-670-9350
    plainsite.org
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is the owner of the website www.plainsite.org. He posts personal and private information on his website. He refuses to take down the information. I am a victim of domestic violence and my personal information is NOT suppose to be online per court orders. Aaron Greenspan refuses to remove my information from his website. He disrespects the law.

    I begged him to remove it because I don't want my ex to find me. He refused to remove it. My ex found me and children in our home were harmed and I was beat up to a bloody pulp after he found me on Aaron's website www.plainsite.org.

    Aaron Greenspan doesn't care about hurting children. He posts the locations of children whose mothers are hiding from abusive relationships.

    He refuses to remove the information. He profits from watching people suffer and get beat up to a bloody pulp.

    He runs his website out of a rented apartment all by himself. He's a lonely man. He hates people, so he uses his website to hurt them by posting their personal and private lives.

    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is a bad person. Here are his other websites.
    http://www.plainsite.org
    http://www.aarongreenspan.com/

    Here is the address which was taken from California San Jose Secretary of State website.

    Updated by Myname2017, Feb 28, 2017
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan is the website owner. He runs the website out of his rented apartment he lives in by himself. He downloads federal lawsuits from Pacer and puts them on his website to humiliate people while he makes money from their names with advertisement.

    Aaron posted on his website all my personal and private information. Through his opt out link, I asked him to remove my information, but he refused. So I called him and asked him. He then yelled at me and refused to remove it and then he slammed the phone in my face.

    I lost several job offers because of his website giving my personal life. He makes his living by hurting innocent people on his website.

    How would he like it if somebody posted his personal life? He doesn't care about people.

    Updated by Myname2017, Feb 28, 2017
    I posted his pictures of him in the red shirt so you can see who he is.

    My Myname2017 Feb 28, 2017
    Sort by: UpDate | Rating
    Comments
    Ww Www.plainsite.org 7th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    http://aaron-j-greenspan.urbanup.com/13114525

    Look up the definition of a Aaron Greenspan rofl.

    Reply
    Pl Plainsite Pro User 9th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    I was a Plainsite Pro user. Mr. Aaron Greenspan threatened our entire firm if we bulked download again. Mr. Aaron Greenspan also mentioned that he will exactly notify other law firms what documents we downloaded. Mr. Greenspan also said we are being tracked very closely. I had a sick taste in my stomach because he was telling us the he hacked into our personal emails. Very strange and angry person .

    That's funny, because I paid (past tense starts next month) $100 a month for PlainSite Pro, and at the bottom of every PlainSite page is literal fine print which reads "Please do not bulk download information from this web site without prior permission."

    Reply
    Jo John Fuenchem 10th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    @Plainsite Pro User How dare of such slander. I will sue you. I'm not Aaron Greenspan. Stop the posts. This Is the last warning.

    Reply
    Lo Long Train 11th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    @Plainsite Pro User People should take legal action against Aaron Greenspan, as he is a thief, con artist, liar and Hacker.

    Reply
    Ww www.Plainsite.org sucks 13th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    @John Fuenchem Aaron Greenspan AKA JOHN FUENCHEM AKA Facebook crazy stalker. Please sue us all as John Fuenchem. You are nothing more than a low life criminal extortionist that is able to lie really well.

    Reply
    Aa Aaron Greenspan stalker me 9th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    I knew it all along. Ever since I reached out to Aaron Greenspan a year ago he has been harassing me on Facebook and emails using different names. Lately he has been using the name Priscilla Chan. (Strange name) lol. I'm so happy this is actually documented. Aaron Greenspan was also using the name John Fuenchem.

    In the comments randy123789 is really Aaron Greenspan.

    The classaction [email protected] is also Aaron Greenspan.

    The article states "Two people I spoke to speculated that Fuenchem is actually a sockpuppet for Greenspan. They believe Greenspan fabricated him in order to help lobby for his anti-FLP campaign."

    Aaron Greenspan is a psychopath stalker and how can we cope with this.

    https://free.law/who-is-john-fuenchem/

    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    Reply
    Aa Aaron Greenspan mentally ill Sociopath 11th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    @Aaron Greenspan stalker me Aaron Jacob Greenspan looks gay. He’s so skinny that he looks like he has full blown AIDS. He is the owner of plainsite.org. Through his website he harasses people by posting their personal information and he refuses to remove it. Do a scam report search for plainsite and you will see all the complaints and how much he has emotionally hurt people. Aaron Greenspan is the son of a doctor. His father’s name is Neil Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan is a 33 year old PIECE OF ****! Aaron Greenspan use to live in Ohio. He now lives in San Jose California. I’m not saying he is gay or that he does have AIDS. I’m just saying that to me he looks gay and to me he looks like he has AIDS. See his pictures below. People hate him because of his website posting personal information that he refuses to remove.

    Reply
    Pl Plainsite.org Plainsite Thinkcomp 10th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    Lol . Thanks for the info. Aaron Greenspan seems to be out of his mind. I came across these blogs where John Fuenchem aka Aaron Greenspan is rambaling like a mental patient. Aaron Greenspan sounds dangerous and I fear for my life and safety. He was invested by attorney general office 7 years ago was able to worm his way out of it. Unlike Aaron Swartz who always had good intentions but committed suicide.

    http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2017/08/free-law-project-massive-searchable.html

    http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/free_law_project_releases_new_plugin_to_improve_free_pacer_archive/

    https://llb2.com/2017/04/05/free-law-project-plans-to-harvest-all-free-opinions-and-orders-from-pacer/

    https://www.techdirt.com/user/johnf

    Reply
    Lo Long Train 11th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    People should not do any business or give any money to Aaron Greenspan, as he is a criminal Hacker.

    Here is the proof if you have any doubts:

    The following is the URL from "ABOVE THE LAW", dated June 18, 2018 and Lawyers witnessed Aaron Greenspan Hacking skills:
    https://abovethelaw.com/2012/06/facebook-litigation-continues-a-closer-look-at-aaron-greenspan/

    The following is page 1 of 2 of this article "ABOVE THE LAW", dated June 18, 2018 and Lawyers witnessed Aaron Greenspan Hacking skills:

    COPYRIGHT, DEFAMATION, DEPOSITIONS, FACEBOOK, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SOCIAL MEDIA, SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES, TECHNOLOGY
    Facebook Litigation Continues: A Closer Look at Aaron Greenspan
    Was Aaron Greenspan the programmer Facebook forgot? Let's hear, in his own words, the story of his various lawsuits against the social network…
    By CHRISTOPHER DANZIG
    Jun 18, 2012 at 4:46 PM
    Last month, we wrote about another in the increasingly long list of Facebook creation story-related lawsuits. The plaintiff in that story was Aaron Greenspan, a college classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. While Greenspan was in school, he created a similar social network to what eventually became Facebook.

    Greenspan alleges that he was unfairly omitted from The Social Network, the 2011 film purportedly telling the history of Facebook. Greenspan felt so jilted at being left out of the movie that he sued the company that published The Accidental Billionaires, on which the hit movie was based (affiliate links).

    As of of our last story, Greenspan’s suit alleging “defamation by omission” had just been dismissed by a Massachusetts federal judge.

    But he appealed the decision to the First Circuit. Over the weekend, he also emailed us, and gave us more detail about his story. Let’s check in and hear what he has to say, along with a colorful deposition story from the old ConnectU case. There’s more than meets the eye to this tenacious programmer turned Facebook nemesis…

    I received the following email from Aaron Greenspan on Sunday afternoon (the entire note is reprinted on the following page):

    In your article on May 14th (https://abovethelaw.com/2012/05/another-one-of-zuckerbergs-former-classmates-tries-and-fails-to-cash-in-on-facebook/) you portrayed me as a hanger-on trying to get rich off of a tenuous connection to Facebook. You also compared me to Paul Ceglia and the Winklevoss twins. You don’t have your facts straight, and the comparison is insulting.

    First of all, I already settled with both Mark and Facebook in 2009, which I don’t think you mentioned in your post. See http://newsroom.fb.com/News/Facebook-and-Think-Computer-Corporation-Resolve-Trademark-Dispute-c6.aspx. While I certainly won’t complain if I’m ultimately awarded damages in the Mezrich case, your implied assertion that the suit is primarily motivated by money is not even close to true. I sued Mezrich because I’d had enough of listening to his lies and his three-hour interview on C-SPAN in November, 2011 was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    5 Questions to Consider When Identifying the Best Legal AI
    Ask yourself these five questions as you evaluate the best AI platform for your legal research.

    MARY SCHLAPHOFF, THOMSON REUTERS
    (For the record, I did briefly mention the settlement in the story. But that is neither here nor there.)

    Greenspan says his fight is not simply not about the money. It’s about trying to correct big-picture unfairness that it seems has been difficult to escape:

    I understand why you might be skeptical, but that’s exactly why I filed this suit. I shouldn’t be forced to battle that skepticism all my life.

    For what it’s worth, shortly after we published our first story about Greenspan, a tipster wrote to us who has a fairly impressive view of Zuckerberg’s former classmate:

    Extremely interesting guy. I know the lawsuit you wrote about is pretty frivolous, but he is only pursuing it because he really was kind of screwed in a way.

    Aaron… wrote software that was way ahead of its time and really did everything and more that “The Facebook” did at Harvard. When Aaron was at Harvard, it morphed into a system that allowed classmates to share reviews about classes and buy and sell used textbooks. There is no doubt in my mind that Zuckerberg borrowed — stole, if you will — fundamental aspects from Greenspan’s system when Zuckerberg designed his.

    Now, the design elements were not patented or copyrighted, so Greenspan was not able to pursue a lawsuit, but I can see why it would be pretty tough for him to sit and watch Zuckerberg become as wealthy and famous as he is while Greenspan became just another “classmate.” I suspect that Greenspan has more raw intelligence when it comes to coding. So, I think that is important insight into the BS lawsuit about defamation by omission. Greenspan is really upset that history, wealth and fame have omitted him.… Alas, life is not fair.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): Greenspan had this to say about our tipster’s note: “houseSYSTEM [the program he designed that, as the New York Times reported in 2007, was in some ways similar to Facebook] was copyrighted. I didn’t pursue a lawsuit because there weren’t any lawyers who would give me the time of day, and I didn’t know enough back then to do it myself.”

    SPONSORED CONTENT

    InfoTrack Changes The Game Once Again With Simplified E-Filing In Illinois
    InfoTrack is entering the electronic filing game, and revolutionizing it in the process.

    STEPHANIE WILKINS
    Our tipster also provided a comical, somewhat impressive anecdote about Greenspan:

    There also is a funny story I heard about a deposition in the Connect U case. The lawyers had technical problems, and Aaron took it upon himself to solve the issue.He unplugged a cord and all the lawyers gasped because they feared that the transcript and/or recording from the day’s session was lost. One of the lawyers questioned him about it, and Aaron looked at him condescendingly and said, “I think I know what I’m doing….”

    Later, they plugged in a computer with a projector so they could pull up some code and question Aaron about it. With a keyboard in front of him, he took all of about 3 minutes to hack into the law firm’s system and display their files on the screen, again to the horror of the lawyers. The lawyer I talked to said it was a pretty amusing moment and did highlight his computer acumen.

    UPDATE (6:32 PM): For his part, Greenspan says he does not remember this happening at the ConnectU deposition.

    Check out Greenspan’s brief (and the appendix) in the defamation-by-omission case, which he filed pro se on June 13. To be fair, it is a bit dense and hard to follow. And it’s not the only Facebook-related litigation he is still involved in. Greenspan is also involved fighting Facebook about a program he created called FaceCash. As Greenspan explained in a follow-up email:

    After the settlement with Facebook in 2009, I began building a mobile payment system called FaceCash (http://www.facecash.com), and planned to release other products that made productive use of facial recognition technology as well. (Well before Facebook, Inc. was around, I took a course on the psychology of facial recognition freshman year in college, and ended up building http://www.faceblind.org, so it’s been an interest of mine for a while.) I registered a few trademarks with the USPTO accordingly. Facebook opposed one of them, for FACEMAIL. The docket is located at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91198355&pty=OPP. It’s not related to Mezrich at all, and only tangentially relates to the settlement issues.

    As it so happens, FaceCash is also tied up in litigation now, but that’s a whole different story unrelated to anything else. You can find that at https://www.facecash.com/legal/brown.html. It’s probably the most interesting and under-reported story of them all.

    Who knows where this clearly intelligent, combative programmer will end up. I’m not sure what the lesson here is, if there’s anything to be learned all. Maybe — especially if some of his claims are really true — it’s that life just isn’t fair.

    But to put a positive spin on it, you could quote John Updike, describing the best qualities in his famous character, Rabbit Angstrom: “[Y]ou haven’t given up. In your stupid way you’re still fighting.”

    Go through to the next page to see Greenspan’s original email, more links to court documents, and links to his personal project websites…

    1 2NEXT »

    Reply
    At Atlantis 42 11th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    The following URL from an article called "Law Sites", dated August 7, 2018 describes how Aaron Greenspan relies on downloading legal documents from the site called CourtListener.com out of San Francisco, California. Aaron Greenspan has been harassing and stalking the people who run CourtListener.com because he cannot control these legal document downloads by himself, so he does what he does best harassing and stalking people. Aaron Greenspan has harassed and stalked even the Board Members of courtlistener.com and seeks out people who communicate with the employees of courtlistener.com, in order to harass, stalk and shame them all over the place. Aaron Greenspan goes by the alias "John Fuenchem" and he refuses to talk to the people over the phone who run courtlistener.com because he knows they will recognize his voice that is Aaron Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan is evil and insane and his father Neil S Greenspan is the VP and Treasurer of the fraudulent 501(c)(3) called Think Computer Foundation based out of Ohio that they state is to "Help the children". Figure that one out.
    https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2018/02/invective-intrigue-within-free-law-movement-recap-changes.html

    There are three sites that dedicate themselves to making money off of people's misery with their legal documents. The most well known are CourtListener.com, plainsite.org and unitedstatescourts.org that is now shut down. All of these people communicate with each other and are all in cahoots with each other. These people know damn well who the other players are when it comes to these monetized websites messing around with the public's legal documents. Another such monetized website is leagle.com that is also run by Aaron Greenspan and did have a Palo Alto, California phone number but he has since gotten rid of that. Aaron Greenspan set up leagle.com with a totally fake persona called "Donald Johnson" from Little Rock, Arkansas. This is an alias and all made up. This is a real dirty, unethical and immoral business when it comes accessing the public's legal documents for personal financial gain.

    Aaron Greenspan uses many aliases and actually answers with his know accounts and then responds with his alias accounts.

    Here is an example: On Reddit.com Aaron Greenspan is known with his user name thinkcorp but he has many aliases on Reddit.com such as "bcboncs". Also the way in which Aaron Greenspan is always a clear giveaway as he basically uses the same wording and has this arrogant insane mannerism.

    Reply
    Aa Aaron Greenspan Sociopath 13th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    Aaron Jacob Greenspan sociopath is a predator. Disgusting. Check the sociopath out . Dr. NEIL S Greenspan. Aaron Jacob Greenspan is sick and needs to be treated.

    https://www.predatorswatch.com/ohio/plainsite-org-think-computer-corporation-think-computer-foundation-aaron-greenspan-aaron-j-greenspan-aaron-jacob-greenspan-plainsite-org-huffpost/

    Reply
    Ri @richardorionllc 13th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    "Think Computer Foundation" and "Think Computer Foundation" is run by one person named Aaron Greenspan. Aaron Greenspan lies and tries to fool the public that he has multiple people working for him. This is a sign of a person who has multiple personalities. Aaron Greenspan Is a parasite who is making his fortune off the death of Aaron Swartz.

    Christine Richard really regrets hiring Aaron Greenspan to go Goes Deep on Her Herbalife Research

    Orion Research, LLC (@richardorionllc). Christine Richard.

    Reply
    Pl PlainSite Reality Check 14th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    Christine Richard, President of Orion Research, hired Aaron Greenspan to write PlainSite :: Reality Check :: Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.

    Aaron Greenspan has zero credibility and is a parasite pathological liar. The dude also looks like Adam Lanza.

    Reply
    Th thinkcomputer.org 15th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    I have a serious question since having interaction with Aaron J Greenspan last week. Is Aaron Greenspan autistic like his brother Simon Greenspan. They both seem to have temper tantrums.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.cleveland.com/metro/2011/08/simon_greenspans_plight_raises.amp

    Think Computer Foundation
    www.thinkcomputer.org

    Reply
    Ww WWW.Aarongreenspan.com 15th of Aug, 2018
    +1 Votes
    Business Insider knew Aaron Greenspan is a parasite years ago. They spelled the pycopath last name incorrectly a few times. Rofl Aaron Greenspan is more like a pile of dung because he smells and looks disgusting.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/parasite-the-aaron-greenberg-story-2009-5

    Facebook Settles With Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard Classmate
    Matt Mireles May 26, 2009, 2:19 PM
    facebook tbi
    Facebook has settled its trademark dispute with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's schoolmate Aaron Greenspan.
    In July 2006, Greenspan petitioned the US Patent & Trademark Office, asking that they revoke Facebook's trademark rights to "Facebook, " "Face Book, " "Universal Face Book" and "Face Net."

    Then -- and until now -- Aaron claimed that Mark Zuckerberg got his idea for Facebook and it's name only after the two had discussed plans for a project called "the Face Book" in 2003.

    We're not lawyers, but we're pretty sure Aaron never had much of a case. According to Harvard's Citizen Media Law Project:

    A trademark is a sign, mark, or indicator used by an individual, business, or organization to identity a product or service as its own and to distinguish the product or service from those of its competitors. A business name generally can be protected as a trademark under federal and state trademark law.

    Trademark law is designed to avoid consumer confusion over the trademarks that businesses or other organizations use in connection with their goods and services.

    To be eligible for protection, trademarks have to be either a) distinctive, or b) f amous. It may not have been in 2003, but by 2006, Facebook was definitely famous. That fame gives Facebook a very strong claim to the trademark. In legalese, they've built up mountains of "good will, " and with it, the attention (and lawsuits) of people like Greenberg.

    Reply
    Ww www.thinkcomputer.com 15th of Aug, 2018
    +2 Votes
    Aaron Greenspan has been harassing many people as John Fuenchem. I came across the Alleged New Facebook Mark Zuckerberg IMs.

    Think Computer Foundation, Think Computer Corporation and plainsite.org are all fraudulent 1 person companies.

    Reply
    Th ThinkComputerFoundation scam 16th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    Aaron Greenspan has a pattern of pathologically lying to people. It happens a lot and that make people concerned for anyone who would trust giving their credit card information or fake court docket of www.plainsite.org. Aaron Greenspan already lies about his site.

    Can you trust Christine Richard and Aaron Greenspan .Herbalife Nutrition Ltd., a Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) nutritional supplement? I think not.

    Reply
    Pl Plainsite plainsite.org plainsite 17th of Aug, 2018
    0 Votes
    Aaron J Greenspan aka Aaron Jacob Greenspan aka John Fuenchem is very sick individual who taunts people and portray the victim. Aaron Greenspan refuses to remove names from Google search. Aaron Greenspan has no respect for anyone . Plainsite.org is hurting minorities and preventing to find work. Think Computer Foundation is a fraudulent charity and has done nothing put help the Greeenspans avoid paying the IRS and finding friends to his retarted brother Simom keene Greenspan.

    Reply
    Aa Aarongreenspan Plainsite.org Facecash 0 mins ago
    0 Votes
    More of crazy Aaron Greenspan as John Fuenchem.

    Hello Mr. Rudenberg,

    You recently engaged with the RECAP initiative on Twitter. You may be interested in knowing that the Free Law Project has decided to charge other organizations money to access RECAP documents, and it now denies access to organizations which refuse to pay. The new version of the RECAP plug-in only uploads documents to the FLP's own CourtListener site, while other sites, such as PlainSite, are no longer being updated in real time. The FLP's Board of Directors made this decision in secret with no public discussion, and they made it despite the FLP's stated position that court documents should be free and freely available to everyone.

    While the FLP is uploading court documents to the Internet Archive nightly, it is not uploading the metadata, meaning that other organizations cannot upload the documents to their own sites. While the FLP has promised it would upload the metadata to the Internet Archive once every three months, it has not done so yet, meaning that other organizations have been cut off from accessing RECAP data since October. Unitedstatescourts.org, which was the third-largest user of RECAP data, has shut down due to the FLP's decision. Another bulk user of RECAP data, Docket Alarm, has sold itself to Fastcase. The FLP's decision seems designed to squeeze out CourtListener's competitors, and it appears to be working.

    I encourage you to read Aaron Greenspan's original blog post at http://bit.ly/2zmyOBm and his update on the situation at http://bit.ly/2nSyExZ. If you need more information, you can e-mail Greenspan at [email protected] He has told me that he may be willing to release his private conversations with the FLP's Mike Lissner. You may also wish to read Harvard Business School professor Ben Edelman's opinion on the FLP's decision at http://bit.ly/2nHO3ld.

    I'm not sure why the FLP feels it is necessary to charge other organizations money for access to RECAP data. Edelman suggests that RECAP's operating expenses shouldn't be very high, especially considering that open source software development often does not entail paying developers anything at all. According to the FLP's 2016 Form 990 (which is posted on its website), the FLP had total revenues of $54, 528 that year, while Mike Lissner made a salary of $90, 010.

    I hope you share my concerns about the FLP's decision, and I hope you'll consider expressing your concerns to the FLP's Board of Directors: Lissner ([email protected]), Brian Carver ([email protected]), and Ansel Halliburton ([email protected]).

    I have had several e-mail exchanges with Lissner. When I asked him about the reasons for the FLP's decision, he repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions and simply responded with vague statements, such as "Our goal is to make RECAP great and we think this is an important part of doing so." He refused to confirm or deny that the FLP was attempting to charge other organizations money for access to RECAP data. At one point, Lissner said "I'm not sure we owe you an explanation of our relationships with other organizations." Meanwhile, my repeated e-mails to Carver and Halliburton have gone completely unanswered.

    I hope you feel that public discussion about the issue is warranted, and I hope you'll consider tweeting a link to one of Greenspan's blog posts.

    Best regards,

    John

    9 Votes
  • More of crazy Aaron Greenspan as John Fuenchem.

    Hello Mr. Rudenberg,

    You recently engaged with the RECAP initiative on Twitter. You may be interested in knowing that the Free Law Project has decided to charge other organizations money to access RECAP documents, and it now denies access to organizations which refuse to pay. The new version of the RECAP plug-in only uploads documents to the FLP's own CourtListener site, while other sites, such as PlainSite, are no longer being updated in real time. The FLP's Board of Directors made this decision in secret with no public discussion, and they made it despite the FLP's stated position that court documents should be free and freely available to everyone.

    While the FLP is uploading court documents to the Internet Archive nightly, it is not uploading the metadata, meaning that other organizations cannot upload the documents to their own sites. While the FLP has promised it would upload the metadata to the Internet Archive once every three months, it has not done so yet, meaning that other organizations have been cut off from accessing RECAP data since October. Unitedstatescourts.org, which was the third-largest user of RECAP data, has shut down due to the FLP's decision. Another bulk user of RECAP data, Docket Alarm, has sold itself to Fastcase. The FLP's decision seems designed to squeeze out CourtListener's competitors, and it appears to be working.

    I encourage you to read Aaron Greenspan's original blog post at http://bit.ly/2zmyOBm and his update on the situation at http://bit.ly/2nSyExZ. If you need more information, you can e-mail Greenspan at [email protected] He has told me that he may be willing to release his private conversations with the FLP's Mike Lissner. You may also wish to read Harvard Business School professor Ben Edelman's opinion on the FLP's decision at http://bit.ly/2nHO3ld.

    I'm not sure why the FLP feels it is necessary to charge other organizations money for access to RECAP data. Edelman suggests that RECAP's operating expenses shouldn't be very high, especially considering that open source software development often does not entail paying developers anything at all. According to the FLP's 2016 Form 990 (which is posted on its website), the FLP had total revenues of $54, 528 that year, while Mike Lissner made a salary of $90, 010.

    I hope you share my concerns about the FLP's decision, and I hope you'll consider expressing your concerns to the FLP's Board of Directors: Lissner ([email protected]), Brian Carver ([email protected]), and Ansel Halliburton ([email protected]).

    I have had several e-mail exchanges with Lissner. When I asked him about the reasons for the FLP's decision, he repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions and simply responded with vague statements, such as "Our goal is to make RECAP great and we think this is an important part of doing so." He refused to confirm or deny that the FLP was attempting to charge other organizations money for access to RECAP data. At one point, Lissner said "I'm not sure we owe you an explanation of our relationships with other organizations." Meanwhile, my repeated e-mails to Carver and Halliburton have gone completely unanswered.

    I hope you feel that public discussion about the issue is warranted, and I hope you'll consider tweeting a link to one of Greenspan's blog posts.

    Best regards,

    John

    8 Votes
  • Ke
    Ken Grunwald Aug 23, 2018

    Aaron Greenspan is giving the Santa Clara Superior Court his address as 500 Race Street, Apartment 4321, San Jose, California. Thing is Aaron Greenspan is lying to the Court because he does not even live at this address.

    12 Votes
  • @Ken Grunwald What?? Aaron Greenspan CEO of plainsite, Think computer Foundation and Think Computer Corporation lied about his address?? But Aaron Greenspan is so honest. After all he runs a website to help like himself and his twin brother Siomon Greenspan.

    11 Votes
  • Da
    David Schoenberg Aug 24, 2018

    Post Aaron Greenspan’s address on here. Someone out there must know where Aaron Greenspan is hiding out like the snake that he is. He seems good at slithering away, whil