Disappointed and Concerned About Safety
Negligence
I purchased a vehicle from McMahon Motors Broward and was assured and specifically asked it had been inspected? I also specifically asked about inspecting the brakes and they did repaire—including the brakes. However, after taking it to my trusted mechanic, I discovered the car had no fluids, bad brakes, completely bald rear tires, and a bad battery (they did replace the battery). These are serious safety hazards that should never be overlooked, especially by a dealership claiming the vehicle was ready for sale. It’s hard to believe that during a brake repair, they wouldn’t have noticed the tire condition when I purchased the car or after the brakes had been put on the car which was also repaired for the lack of fluids—all of which have prevented me from being able to do my work.
The owner, Jose McMahon, accused me of “assaulting his employees”—an allegation I strongly deny, as I haven’t been physically near them since they completed work on my brakes. I was then accused of “extortion” by Julian Garcus, the manager for simply inquiring why the tires were bald with treat exposed which turned into a 12 inch bubble. I’ve had the car a couple weeks I requesting that the tires be replaced.
Both claims are dishonest, unfounded and deeply concerning.
Under Florida Statute § 501.204 (FDUTPA), even in an “as is” sale, dealers are prohibited from deceptive practices. Selling a car with bald tires and other safety issues without disclosing the risks could be considered a violation of this law.
On November 2, 2025 at 12:19 PM, I received a call from the owner, Jose, who accused me of “assault” against his employee Toni—despite the fact that I have never been physically near Toni. I’ve only been calling to follow up on the unresolved safety issues: no fluids, bad brakes (which they claimed to have repaired), and rear tires with no tread at all. When they repaired the brakes, I would have gladly purchased new tires had I been informed.
On November 3rd at 8:23 PM, I found myself stranded on the side of the highway once again—this time due to exposed tread and a large bubble forming in the tire. It’s deeply troubling that a vehicle was sold in such unsafe condition. This raises serious questions about the seller’s standards and accountability.
Florida statue:
If the dealer misrepresented the vehicle’s condition, you may have legal recourse under consumer protection laws.
Here’s what Florida law says:
“As Is” Sales
• In Florida, most used car sales are final under the “as is” principle, meaning the buyer accepts the car in its current condition—even with faults legalclarity...
• There is no automatic right to return the vehicle, even within 72 hours lawshun.com.
Exceptions Under FDUTPA
• The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) prohibits dealers from engaging in deceptive or unfair conduct—even in “as is” sales Pike & Lusti...
• If the dealer falsely claimed the car was inspected or safe, or failed to disclose known safety hazards like bald tires, you have grounds for a legal claim.
Bald Tires and Safety
• Bald tires are considered a serious safety risk and may cause accidents due to poor traction and braking csgfirm.com.
• If the dealer advertised the car as “road-ready” or “inspected,” but sold it with bald tires, that could be seen as misrepresentation and is misleading.
The owner did offer me a refund, but since I’ve already secured financing, reversing the process would be far more complicated than replacing the bad tires they sold on the car.
Bottom line: “As is” doesn’t protect dealers from deceptive practices. If safety issues were hidden or misrepresented, you may have a case.