As a regular sky sport watcher and avid Wolves fan. I am both disappointed and disgusted with the amount of...
Why on Earth do us license payers have to put up with listening to that [censored] Jamie Carragher. He is an X footballer for christs sake & his playing days are long over. We don't need these hangers on in todays football no do we need all this Analysis [censored]. Football clubs have managers to analyse the game their players have played in & try to sort out where they went wrong or where to improve on their next game. Also what's this Front foot [censored] they talk about. NO such thing, it's know as ATTACKING (that's kicking the ball forward as quickly & as accurately as possible in trying to score goals for your side. Also there is no such thing as Back foot either, that's knows as DEFENDING (getting as many players back to DEFEND as quickly as possible in order to try & stop the opposition from scoring goals. Enough said. So, sky, get rid of Jamie Carragher & all the other hangers on that have had their day & let a Commentator do his/her job talking about the game as it happens without all the interruption from [censored] like Carragher etc etc. Then perhaps i will be able to watch a football game without my remote in permanent MUTE so as not to listen to [censored] like Carragher. Get it sorted Sky or it's BBC forever for me & the other millions out there who haven't got the bottle to speak up like i have done. Perhaps they'll read this & act the same way i have. Get it sorted Sky, regards, Kenny Shaw
Regarding the Sheffield Utd vs Crystal Palace game.
Your commentary of the game was shockingly bias against Crystal Palace.
Crystal Palace didn't play well and as a Palace fan I recognise this, but from the off Alan Smith used constant negative language towards Palace and positive for Utd.
When Palace had good spells he did his best to spin it for Utd.
Please ask him to be impartial and professional.
Not Sky Sports greatest hour
Why does Sky Premier football employ Gary Neville to comment on premier matches? He never remains neutral, shows bias particularly when Manchester sides are engaged and has clearly demonstrated this today during the coverage of Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur. If you want to use quality former players then find anyone better than this guy. He was one of the worst full backs I have ever seen and when playing for England it was often that goals scored against us came from the left wing which he was meant to protect. The guy was elevated way beyong his ablility and left to me he would have been lucky to have played in a Sunday Pub side league. Get rid of him and find someone who is impartial and genuinely understands the game of football.
I am astounded that David Gower's contract is not being renewed. Gower is a tremendous anchor and one of a number of great players that commentate on Sky. Kumar Sangakarra being the latest to join the team. The fact that Isa Guha has also joined the team makes things even worse. She witters on and on when less words would very much be a case of less is more.
Having been Sky customers for many years and avid Golf viewers, why do we now have to endure Alison Whitaker an opinionated woman with a terrible loud Grating voice/accent that makes my wife an I look for the mute button! Her grammar is awful and she continually introduces booming interferences of Sky's excellent commentators. How do people as bad as her manage to find their way on to a Sky platform?
Please replace her ASAP.
P and M Murphy
Kaveh Solhekol tweeted that he 'hates Tories'. As it was Tory voters that helped build Sky into what it is today I would have thought you would have more respect for your customers. Solhekol clearly only cares about himself - what he said was deeply disrespectful and unprofessional. Someone offending such a large number of clients in any other business would be sacked. I expect him to be disciplined and Sky Sports to make an apology on air.
Why do TV cameras on Sky Sports football matches not follow the game?
So often, we miss what is going on when the ball is in play, since the camera is switched to one which is looking at a player who is nowhere near the ball, or to a manager, or to a linesman, or to the crowd. Why do this?
I have paid to watch a game of football, I don't want to watch an individual who isn't involved in the immediate action.
the new championship football highlights programme of 30 mins is ver poor.what happened to the one hour programme with a studio and presenters etc. no interviews with managers after game .its an insult to the thousands of supporters of championship teams and most of all sky sports watchers and suscribers.so dissapointed with sky sports as coverage of football is usually first class.dave a sheffield wednesday supporter.my email is david.[protected]@outlook.com
I have paid £8.99 for a day pass and the last 20 minutes coverage of the England v Wales rugby match is appalling. The image is unclear and ruins the ability to concentrate on the match.
I am not happy with the level of service you have provided and this is not worthy of the £8.99, nor does this bode well for future matches this month and your intended sponsorship and coverage in the future.
How disappointing that I tune in the watch Arsenal V Newcastle commentary but the team is made up of ex players known for there disliking of Arsenal and only talking about Liverpool ans Man city??? How limited are sky sports to have the same pundits each week with such limited knowledge of each and every football team in the league. I think I'm going to Cancel my sky and get BT because they have a team that reflect each match...not happy
Why oh why is Sky Sports employing that irksone, incoherent, thick as a plank Clinton Morrison? Won NOTHING in football, worse than Merson in his use (or lack of) the English language and comes across as a complete dimwit. There are far better, well-versed former players Sky could employ, so why the company persist with Morrison is beyond me. I've turned off now, back to 5 Live, time to re-consider Sky subsription.
As a sky customer for over 8 years I find it absolutely disgusting the amount of times Leeds United are shown live in sky sports. Just this season, they are on 3 times within 10 days. That's their first 3 games all live in sky when Yorkshire derbies like Sheffield Wednesday v Barnsley get overlooked. The league 1 team Bury are struggling for money and have had to postpone there EFL Cup game v Sheffield Wednesday, the tv money they would of got if Sky had chose to show it live could possibly have saved them but instead they have chosen Leeds, AGAIN!!
As a football fan I don't believe it is fair to not only give this much air time to a single team, but also all the TV money that comes with being on Sky as much as they are, it simply isn't fair to the clubs that get overlooked week after week. There are smaller clubs in the championship alone that could really do with that money and as Leeds' spending over the last few transfer windows have proved, they do not need the money like those teams do.
I am sure I am not the first person to make this complaint as it is something I see on social media throughout the season.
I look forward to an explanation from Sky regarding this complaint.
Why are you advertising with the premier league trophy without putting the champions colours on it, also do you have shares in Liverpool as you would think they won the premier league not city or is it just city the whole of sky don't like, they are one of the best teams in the world and all you do is put them down you never give them the credit with what they have achieved but big up Liverpool and others around them and Liverpool won a cup you don't televise and you wonder why people try not to pay for the football you show
At any fotball match with Liverpool playing why, oh why do neutral viewers have to endure such a biased commentary (term used very loosely) by somone who would easily qualify as the head of the Liverpool FC Appreciation Society. I find his unending criticism of match officials, managers and players by somebody who was nothing more than a priveldged player of the game is totally unacceptable. Bring back unbiased commentary by experienced commentators please.
Looking forward to the new season but STILL have to listen to the commentators prattling on about things not relevant to what is on the pitch. Tyler and Carragher. Ended up with the mute button on for much of the game!
Why can't the pontificating be stopped and concentrate on action on the pitch. Examples, discussing how pre season training was conducted over 10 years ago, and what they did in the off season - how is that relevant to the first match of the new Premiership season ?
Annoying considering the amount this service costs, enough to consider cancelling the sports contract!
Nicole Rosberg is continuing his tirade of abuse and hatred towards F1 5 times world champion Lewis Hamilton, is this really allowed? I know presenter commentators are allowed to give an opinion on a drivers ability but it's happening off the show to such an extent it borders on hatred, he states things like Lewis's illness was not due to flu but the lewis Hamilton show, and that he is not as good as max Vestappen, and anyone could beat Lewis in a Mercedes, if you would like to read some of this awful rubbish you will find them on the Lewis and Valtteri Mercedes website Lewis Hamilton 44 site, formula 1 fans, formula 1 fans forever, the daily mail sports pages and more! Just because we have to pay to view sky sports f1 does not mean we expect to hear hatred towards Lewis Hamilton! Especially from rosberg, all this shows is intense jealousy, not a little rivalry or bias towards another driver, it is abuse, hatred and bullying!
On the 9.8.19 Leeds versus Catalan as the young girl "Amy "walked the match ball out he commented Amy who suffers with Down syndrome.. how rude ! Yes she may have downs but that young girl was definitely not suffering and he shouldn't imply with downs you suffer ... very disappointed you sound very uneducated in what levels of Down's syndrome there is
‘Who is that terrible woman?' asked my wife during the very first day of the mens ashes coverage on sky cricket. She was actually referring to the highly irritating witter of Isha Guha, a new addition to sky's commentary team, who unfortunately employs a kind of forced monotone delivery that borders on a shout. I have to report that since then it's a rush to mute the sound whenever that particular lady comes on to do her commentary stint. True, the lady is knowledgeable (having played the game at the highest level herself) and she appears to be an awfully nice person, but alas, her commentary simply comes across as someone trying extremely hard to be a commentator yet without the depth and creativity needed to pull it off and make it in the least bit interesting. In what appears to be an attempt to impress she talks far too much and more often than not simply ends up stating the obvious. All in all it seems that her appointment owns a great deal to political correctness rather than to any kind of aptitude.
Why do you have Shane warren commentating he is so biased. Even if England play a good shot he talks about the Aussie bowler... where as the English commentary is very fair to the point some time harder on England. Get rid of the winging Aussie have some proper unbiased commentary..you don't get the same when England are playing in Australia.. they are brutal.