The only complaint I filed (informally) was through ddg ai - and the added/blocked/added/blocked, apparently for good, ability to mash up a variety of images and create political cartoons, just plain humor, serious statements about the world - things ddg ai has demonstrated the ability to do - and provide private.jpgs to folks who lack cgi video generation equipment - the common users.
It’s something it owes users who don’t have the access to generate, at taxpayer expense, cartoons showing all the animals of Africa bowing before our leader as “The Lion King” followed by the depiction of his Black predecessor and his wife as apes much lower in intelligence than human apes.
Agreement/disagreement isn’t the issue - I complained about thr lack of provision of a service everyone deserves to have. I might not agree with a service user, but will defend a user’s right to an opinion.
My complaint wasn’t listed in a screen (having nothing to do with me) that said, effectively, “complainant has no idea what s/he’s talking about.
I didn’t ask for membership in this forum, and just want to see ddg providing an important service it’s proven it can, again - a necessary part of freedom to make yourself hero or show yourself a fool.
A basic right, especially when only the designer has the ability to decide who gets to see the “art”.
Claimed loss: Freedom of our soap boxes
Desired outcome: Allow the service again - maybe with the usual unenforced guardrails (was recently allowed, if I wanted, to privately watch 2 youtube videos - vivisection of a kitten, another kitten burned alive)
Confidential Information Hidden: This section contains confidential information visible to verified DuckDuckGo representatives only. If you are affiliated with DuckDuckGo, please claim your business to access these details.