Stanford Health Care review: Discrimination of medical care providers, surgical battery

My child is the victim of a hate crime involving Children's Hospital Los Angeles, UCLA, CHOC, LA County, Department of Developmental Services, CCS and the Regional Centers. Dr. Edward Bloch a Stanford graduate is being charged with creating a disabled population in Los Angeles to justify the need to CCS and the Regional Centers. My daughter is his victim, she suffered multiple acts of medical battery, and we came to Stanford to try and save her from these criminals, only to be met with new ones. I am filing a suit against these doctors and brining a RICO action against them. For more information about the RICO case Stanford is going to become part of see La Superior court cases [protected]. There are four more suits related to this action being filed against the Department of Education and the Regional Centers, plus a dozen Federal suits regarding constitutionality of statute.

What happened at Stanford. All the doctors were briefed on the abuse in the beginning. Dr. Bronzoni resisted L. g-tube, it was not elective surgery as he claims, our gastroenterologist at UCLA will testify it was medically necessary. When he completes the surgery, he inserted a mickey button a size smaller than prescribed by her GI. I told them before we left it was the wrong size, but Dr. Bronzoni refused to see us, look at it or give us a larger size. When we went in for a follow up, he was quick to say, "if you bring this to court it was elective surgery anyway so I would not be responsible, you chose to have surgery it was not medically necessary". However, it was, and now L. needs surgery to fix her stoma because it healed wrong because of the tiny button and has hard scar tissue blocking the hole and it is sewed in too deep. He did this intentionally. When I called him when it because swollen and irritated, he again refused to talk to us, he had a nurse practitioner the most dangerous population of medical professionals to disabled children and have no business doing anything but taking a temperature. I have a PhD, I know they do this as a form of discrimination with low-income families. She needs surgery because of this botched surgery from 4/22 and we are suing and see it as intentional retaliation. Dr. Prolo, a lower-level neurosurgeon which is all Stanford will allow my child because your hospital offers service by income not medical need. L. neurosurgical needs are extreme, she has never seen anyone but the head neurosurgeon, but Stanford is prejudiced, so L. only gets to see a nurse practitioner, and that nurse practitioner set her shunt wrong and did not follow procedure, so L.has been sick even since her last appointment at Stanford. They rest her shunt wrong the same time they surgically battered her, so it was not coincidental. The NP also neglected to x-ray the vp shunt after resetting, so there was no way to know she set it wrong, but that was also intentional. Stanford skips steps based on insurance. I have been to so many hospitals I can tell the difference. I called Dr Prolo two months ago telling her I thought there was something wrong with the shunt and wanted to make an appointment, and she reduced. I dont trust Stanford Neurosurgery, they are killing my baby for Dr. Bloch, Stanford alumni, I need to find her a new neurosurgeon now because Stanford will only allow a child with State insurance an NP even if she has half a brain, vp shunt, history of extreme brain injury from surgery. Because Stanford Does not care about all populations equally and my child cannot get the same care a middle-class white child can. Stanford is the most prejudice towards the disabled population, especially the marginalized. Last is Dr. Porter, she knows all the medical abuse L. went through but acts as if she does not hear me and controls L. care. L. has serious Liver and Kidney issues and that is because Dr. Porter makes all the decisions regarding that because she block's L. access to Nephrology. I will file a formal suit next week.