Menu
Write a review
File a complaint
CB Wikipedia
ComplaintsBoard
9:31 am EDT
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

false information comes from wikipedia quite often and one for example is that a antidote/ medicine colloidal silver is being mistaken as a placebo drug. And the doctors have “consumer reports” convinced. wikipedia says when I look up colloidal silver, Consumer Reports lists colloidal silver as a "supplement to avoid", describing it as "likely unsafe $$$...

Read full review of Wikipedia
ComplaintsBoard
E
12:02 pm EST
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

Wikipedia is regarded as an accurate online resource for information. However when I joined wikipedia as a contributor, any good addition regarding Islam and Pakistan were deleted by the other hindu indian contributors. I followed the guidelines and submitted published material but it was unbelievable how wikipedia corrupt staff is racist, fraudulent and...

Read full review of Wikipedia
ComplaintsBoard
S
8:51 pm EDT

Wikipedia contacting you this way because I couldn't find another

Just wondering why you feature content from Wikipedia when I do a search. It's a terribly unreliable source of information, as I am sure you are aware. I also don't understand your willingness to partner with Google or any of its related companies, given that what you advertise is the very antithesis of anything in the googlesphere: privacy first, and by implication, unbiased search results. I appreciate the privacy. I would really like to get unbiased search results, which are no longer available via google.

Read full review of Wikipedia
Hide full review
ComplaintsBoard
V
7:33 am EDT
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

It can be clearly seen that all the information provided on Wikipedia is highly biased. For example any information portraying India, will be given hardly any importance. Most of the times even facts are also not provided properly. On the other hand similar info highlighting US will be provided in a grand manner even without correct information.

Read full review of Wikipedia and 3 comments

Giving a Voice to Consumers

We support genuine feedback

At ComplaintsBoard, we know how real consumer issues matter. Our platform is a special place for honest opinions, where people share their reviews openly and honestly, whether good or bad.

We are committed to authenticity

Our team checks each complaint or review thoroughly to confirm that each one comes from a real customer experience, keeping our platform trustworthy.

We prefer proof

We're totally cool with complaints, as long as you've got some evidence to back it up. Whether it's a photo, a detailed story, or documents, providing evidence makes your complaint more believable and helps others make smart choices.

We’re all about conversations

ComplaintsBoard is more than just a place to share complaints; it's a community where we talk things out fairly. We welcome reviews that not only point out problems but also mention any positive experiences, giving a balanced view.

We are open to everyone

We're dedicated to providing a fair and unbiased platform for all complaints. Every complaint is important to us, no matter what it's about, ensuring your concerns are heard and respected.