The complaint has been investigated and
resolved to the customer's satisfactionResolved Royal Flush Family Companions — not what they seem
resolved to the customer's satisfaction
1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report.
Before she tries to threaten to get a lawyer, scream, yell and throw another temper tantrum like she did in her email response, she needs to learn the definition of the words she throws around. slander is something untrue holly. everything here is true and you are going to continue to be exposed for the contemptible person you are.
A - good - breeder would not yell and scream at someone and call them a lunatic. they would be concerned about their animals and try to help. a - good - breeder would not offer "every penny" to take a dog back. they would know that the person who has the dog is worried and cares about the dog. it isn't about the money! it is about the fact that you defrauded the person who bought the dog and made it appear that the dog has been to a vet, was well and was house trained. none of which were true since you either admitted it after the sale or have no proof! a - good - breeder would want to work with that person to resolve an issue, not dismiss them and start a fight! you want a war lady? you got one! if the dogs that have been adopted are any indication of what is going on behind closed doors then there's — no way — a decent person could ignore this and walk away! this is not one or two "lunatics" as you so politely put it. we are a legion of people that have found a way to communicate and you are going to answer to this and the years of abuse you have heaped on these animals!
On to the real holly - whatever the heck her name is now:
Her name has changed because she's been married 6 times (that I could find). I ordered reports through several sites, including one from the company below which lists some of her previous names through marriage. I also verified with the courts in providence, rhode island:
Nice webpage about yourself!!!... meet holly!!!... the real holly!!!... family #1???... which freaking one???
I did an address search and found more info on her in addition to the names of other possible ex-husbands and residents here:
She was born in rhode island and has been a lifelong resident of several cities and towns around rhode island. this was also verified.
Her corporation shows her as a dog breeder. this directly contradicts the information I was told by her town hall who said that her dogs are registered but that she signed an affidavit with the town that she does not breed. she did apply for the commercial kennel license with them in march, 2011. by the way, the presa canario story is true because the town acknowledged that she had an issue with them over removing those dogs from her property which could explain why rocceo was going to be dumped in south providence as the previous poster mentioned. not like the "back injury" she mentioned in her ad to get rid of him!
Petition for commercial kennel license
All of her breeding sites:
Very important!... please read this info carefully!
I also took the liberty of speaking directly with the dog officer, kathy. she said that if we have issues they need to be taken up directly and independently with her. please bring bill of sale, vet records to attest to illness and condition of dog, etc. she said that she was aware that holly had "a lot of dogs" on that property but that her hands are tied unless we all do this individually and directly with her. her number is in the post above.
We should also be contacting the other agencies listed there with our concerns - directly. this includes sending a copy of all of this to the charlestown, ri town hall zoning department, joseph warner: [protected]. they are the ones who are reviewing her petitions and know that she does not have the right to have a kennel on her property.
Taking out loans as a "testing labratory" through her corporation
She uses dr davidson as her vet and has a photo of him on her website. our sources have informed us that he is the vet who debarks the dogs in his mobile vet van in her driveway. I tried to call his office to verify this but I was told the records were confidential. I think we may have to demand this information from him publicly. there is a photo of him on her website. he obviously knows her, her dogs and how many. we need to demand to know where his ethics are. though I suspect that his lie with his wallet too.
I am going to continue to delve into her background and see what else I come up with. there are a lot of records online and at the courthouse that I have found would attest to her character and business ethics but I will leave them for another time. you are welcome to go online or to the courthouse and search her yourself. they were shocking and indicative of someone that lacks a moral conscience.
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer's satisfaction.