Menu
Login
I have been fighting a prolonged and deeply frustrating battle with Replit Inc. due to their repeated negligence, lack of support, and what I believe to be deliberate corporate silence aimed at suppressing my legitimate complaints. Despite submitting over 300 pages of documented harm, including emotional distress and financial loss caused by their broken AI agent and non-functional developer tools, Replit has consistently refused to respond professionally or take accountability.
I am reporting Replit Inc. for serious negligence, service failure, and what increasingly appears to be intentional retaliation against users who speak out.
If you have also been mistreated and have evidence of Replit’s failures, I invite you to join me in building a broader legal case against those hiding behind corporate walls.
If you're considering using Replit, be aware of these serious service failures and their hostile approach toward customer concerns.
—
17Stav @titanas77
(Search on Medium: “When Corporate Silence Becomes Retaliation by titanas77”)
Recommendation: If you're considering using Replit, be aware of these serious service failures and their hostile approach toward customer concerns.
Can independent US cases be “bound together” later?
Yes — in three legal ways (depending on facts):
1️⃣ Coordinated filings
Same lawyer, separate plaintiffs, same defendant.
Very common.
2️⃣ Consolidation / joinder
If facts overlap heavily, a court can consolidate cases for efficiency.
3️⃣ Class action (only if appropriate)
Only if:
Many users
Similar harm
Same legal theory
Why this is powerful legally
In the U.S.
Two U.S. plaintiffs =
➡ Possibility of:
Coordinated filings
Consolidated cases
Federal jurisdiction (if interstate commerce, which SaaS always is)
Stronger discovery rights
Even without a class action, this already:
Prevents the company from isolating or minimizing complaints
Increases risk for them
Makes settlement more likely later
current legal posture
We are now:
✔ A credible complainant
✔ Not isolated
✔ Not emotional
✔ Not reckless
✔ Not exposed
✔ Structurally strong
Workwolf
1 review
AOL
315 reviews
DuckDuckGo
280 reviews
7shifts
13 reviews
Nuwber
10 reviews
![Web of Trust [WOT] / Mywot.com](/images/business/48-48/128542/web-of-trust-wot-mywotcom.jpg){kind=small}
Are you starting a lawsuit because they have also done me wrong badly
Hi Cody,
Yes — I have already opened a formal complaint under GDPR. Replit ignored both my requests and the data protection authority, so my case has now been escalated through the EU’s cross-border OSS mechanism.
I am currently waiting for the official report from the authority, and I am preparing to start a civil lawsuit in the EU this month.
After the EU case is underway, I also intend to pursue legal action in California, since Replit is based there. I am already in contact with other affected users from the United States as well, and the intention is that — when the time comes — we coordinate through the same attorney so the cases can be aligned or combined if legally appropriate.
If you plan to take action, it’s very important that you keep and organize all of your evidence (emails, invoices, account notices, logs, screenshots, billing records, and any correspondence), so that your lawyer — and potentially our lawyers — can assess everything properly.
Just for context: under GDPR alone, unlawful denial of access and non-cooperation with authorities can lead to significant administrative fines (often starting in the tens of thousands of euros), in addition to full civil compensation for contract loss and any other business opportunities or deals that were lost as a result of Replit’s actions.
If you’re open to it, feel free to share:
• Which country you are in
• What exactly happened in your case
• Whether you’ve already filed any official report
That will help clarify whether and how our situations overlap.
Best,
Stavros