Indian Army Complaints & Reviews

The complaint has been investigated and
resolved to the customer's satisfaction
Resolved
Indian Armycrrouption in army

Criminal Indian army officer
Complaint against corruption in Army saving tainted Lt Colonel Ramendra Dutt Sharma IC- 54524P posted in Firozpur cantonment Punjab- judicial court framed charges u/s 33, 341, 392 & 34 of IPC & Supreme Court of India confirmed the cognizance u/s 323, 341, 384 & 120IPC. High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur confirmed that he conspired for extortion. The summery of the case is- The judicial court of Ajmer framed charges against this officer IC- 5452P u/s u/s 33, 341, 392 & 34 of IPC and bailed him out with heavy security. The district and session court confirmed the legality of charges on the revision of this accused (published in Hindustan Times Jaipur edition dates 9 August 2013) The accused IC – 5452P is also facing charges of extortion and criminal conspiracy in judicial court. The Rajasthan High Court Jaipur and then Supreme Court of India maintained the cognizance against the accused in 2009. The Rajasthan High Court of Jodhpur in 1019/ 2005 order dated 20 December 2011 clearly stated that he used the signed blank papers to file false complaints. the support of the army is- The accused IC 5452P use army organization for threatening witnesses who have filed affidavits in the concerned court. The accused recently threaten me- the victim for murder to withdraw the cases. The army organization also sending certificate of the accused IC- 5452P in courts and also stating that the accused is busy in operation to save the country and therefore unable to attend the dates. the question is- Whether an army officer charged by the court in such heinous crime could serve the nation perfectly? Whether the army cantonments are made for officers to conspire to temper the witnesses as the Ajmer and Nasirabad cantonments are used by the accused IC- 5452P ? Whether the Indian army does not initiate explanations from such tainted officer who influence civil authorities on behalf of martyrs? .Now army saving kin of this criminal on the money of Indian tax payers

Add your opinion

    By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions

    Indian ArmyComplaint against Mr. Patil designated as NK now working in Chetak Extension No.2 Near Barnala Road Bathinda Cantt. 151004 using arbitrary power

    Sub: Complaint against Mr. Patil designated as NK now working in Chetak Extension
    No.2 Near Barnala Road Bathinda Cantt. 151004 using arbitrary power

    It is respectfully submitted that I am an Exserviceman aged about 70 years old. On dated [protected] at 11.00 AM, I with my wife went to Chetak Extension No.2 Near Barnala Road Bathinda Cantt. 151001 for purchase of liquor and necessary household items. Because I am in old age I can not drive and carry the load. My wife is also in old age and also a patient of diabetics so our son helps us. My wife went alone into the chetak Extension No.2 for Purchase of items.because Mr Patil at the Gate ordered that only one person will go. We also showed him our identity cards but Mr. Patil did not listen to us.I and my son stayed outside but my wife at old age could not lift the weight she requested Mr Patil to allow my son only to bring the goods outside but Mr Patil not only insulted us and also sent my wife outside without purchasing any goods. He insulted my wife and asked her that if she could not lift her weights she could not shop in his canteen. He also used wrong words and misbehaved with my wife.

    Sir this is a case of absolute insult of senior citizens and Ex Serviceman who served his prime youth for serve his country. Kindly check this matter and provide justice to us. Sir my simple question is whether in this country an ex serviceman further a senior citizen or his wife can not shop in military canteen at bathinda Whether he is at the mercy of Mr. Patil.


    Rabinder Kumar Setia
    Ex Serviceman
    213 Urban Estate
    Phase-1
    Bathinda- 151001

    Add your opinion

      By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions

      The complaint has been investigated and
      resolved to the customer's satisfaction
      Resolved
      Indian ArmyNon-Payment of Terminal Gratuity and balance arrears of 6th Pay Commision

      I am Capt Saif Qezilbash who was a second generation into the army. I had taken voluntary retirement in March'08 serving 05 years in the army. With due respect, it is agonising that till date I have'nt recieved my terminal gratuity also my balance arrears. My emails, leetters, telephonic conversations have fallen on deaf ears. I was wanting to book a house and waiting for the money to be released, but the scheme went by and I still haven't got my money from the Indian Army. Are they going to pay for the damage?

      This is my endeavour to be heard and get m hard earned money from an institution which speaks of integrity, honesty and claims that army takes care of its men. Is this the way care has been done to its men????

      Add your opinion

        By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions

        • Ma
          Mahendra.Singh Jul 02, 2011

          Myself Mahendra Singh, Ex serviceman voluntary retired in 1994 november. I heard about the supreme court law for pre-1996 retirees. please tell me about the details of form and is it possible to claim for 3.5 lac gratuity. What are the terms and conditions. Give me revert on my id i.e. [protected]@yahoo.co.in and my contact no. [protected], [protected].

          0 Votes

        Indian ArmyMILITARY NURSING OFFICERS SUFFERINGS

        dear ALL

        thanks at last one good indian and a good human being has understood the trouble the mns face.
        yes i agree.the management (principal matrons etc.) do not know to administer . the mns officers are really living at the will and mercy of the pmsetc.(that is what the pms think0.imagine a person working at night shift from 7.30 pm to next 8.30 or 9 am and the reliver is not provided.can anyone tolerate??? even after completing the night duty sometimes continuously for 25 days the day off(which they are entitled to) is not given saying that there is no reliever.is it not the utter lack of efficiency of the admini ladies??? if no reliever bloody well engage so many tutor ladies who are simply heating their *********** buttering the male officers and roaming around. which country does engage the female officers for continuous night duty for 15 to 25 days without weekly off.why do they call it a weekly off???.that should be given every week.what to do the law makers also do not understand the difficulties and sufferings of the mns.that is not the surprise.even the principal matrons and assistants also do not know or do not understand the sufferings of the mns(or they act and forgot their sufferings they underwent).

        this is absolutely lack of knowledge and lack of management skill so that the time table and roster as to whom to engage in the comfortable manner.
        some mns get night duty every month and some do not get night duty even after 5 months.the ddmns or whoever incharge of the mns in the headquartes shoul have a check to findout the efficiency of the administrators and if they do not desrve the post please remove her from the duty responsibility and give them other responsibility after findingout which is suitable for them.

        ALL I WANT TO SAY IS DO NOT KILL THE MNS AND RUIN THEIR LIFE .THEY ARE EMPLOYED BY THE ARMY AND ABIDE BY THE RULES BUT PLEASE I REQUEST ALL THE LAWMAKERS AND CONCERNED PEOPLE TO IN THE ARMY TO COSIDER THEY ARE ALSO GOOD CITIZEN AND DO NOT MAKE THEM FEEL THAT THEY ARE TRAPED AND RUINED THEIR ;LIFE BY CHOOSING THE MNS JOB AND DEVELOP THE HATRED TOWARDS THE INDIAN ARMY WHICH LEADS TO HUMILIATION AND SADNESS AND SPOIL THEIR FAMILY LIFE AND NOT ABLE TO UPBRING THEIR CHILDREN AS OTHER CIVILIANS BRING UP. I AM ALSO WITH YOU TO LAUNCH A FIGHT TILL THE END FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THE MNS.

        .

        Add your opinion

          By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions

          • Va
            vasant Jan 21, 2009

            i agree the above complaint

            0 Votes
          • Jo
            jos Feb 18, 2009

            they must pay according to their qualification... may be they are rarely pree degree..and the perks they are getting is high..

            0 Votes