MSN
reviews and complaints

In the past, journalism was synonymous with providing honest and unbiased news coverage. Famous reporters such as Walter Cronkite and Tom Brokaw had integrity, and people could trust them implicitly. However, it appears that the truth-seeking objective of journalism has been compromised by news organizations like MSN.

The quality of reporting on MSN is nothing short of biased and manipulative. Their articles are often deliberately skewed to reflect their ultra-liberal political views, and readers are left with a sense of distrust when they finish reading their articles. It is disturbing to find such dishonest journalism on their website, which is now more like a propaganda platform than a news site.

In addition to their questionable reporting, MSN inundates its site with dozens of spam articles filled with horrid grammar and subpar content. The site's management seems to think that the public will somehow gloss over these spam articles and still give them credibility. How wrong they are.

MSN's refusal to adhere to basic journalistic principles not only shows their lack of integrity, but it also has the potential to cause significant harm to society by polarizing the public with their skewed, half-truths and deliberate biases. Despite my PC automatically opening to MSN's homepage, I quickly and intentionally leave. The publication has, unfortunately, established itself as a wholly untrustworthy organization.

The perception of MSN's media focus has been summed up by some as being centered solely on "Trump Bad." This perspective is not even thinly veiled but rather presented as blatant left-wing propaganda. MSN seems to be shaping content to feed a particular narrative, with little regard for dissenting opinions or feedback. It's as if they don't expect their consumers to question any of the information presented and instead, assume that readers will follow their rhetoric blindly.

MSN's content is designed to coax readers into the left-wing agenda, at times negatively influencing their perspectives on certain subjects. Those working at MSN seem to be convinced that their ideas are the only "right ones" and that people who disagree are not worth consideration. They appear not to appreciate any critiques they may be receiving, particularly from those who dare to think outside the box.

Ironically, MSN's feedback continues to draw attention to their skewed views, and they are now at risk of being branded as idiots if they continue their present approach to content development. As it stands, their message is not a neutral one, and they have put up barriers against those who would question it. In essence, they are trying to silence people who might put an alternative view forward. This is somewhat of a worrying scenario, especially since people are accustomed to having the freedom to express their thoughts without censorship.

MSN is doing a disservice to their readers by stifling feedback, essentially asking people to be silent. It sends a message that dissenting views are not welcome and will be met with closed ears and minds. This kind of attitude is unacceptable in progressive societies. Thus, while MSN appears to be moving forward with a particular agenda, the more they silence those who disagree with them, the more they begin to look regressive.

MSN News is an online platform that brings together news stories from various publishers for readers to peruse. Alongside this, it provides a platform for readers to express their views and share their thoughts on the articles. Unfortunately, it seems the guidelines that MSN has put in place are so broad and general that they can be interpreted in many ways, which leads to a great deal of content being filtered out. In fact, the censorship is so prevalent that almost any post can be suppressed, leaving readers wondering if they can truly speak their minds.

To make matters worse, MSN employs keyword matching to identify posts that may be deemed "objectionable." It's unclear how many or which keywords are used, leaving readers in a state of confusion and uncertainty. The poster has no chance to defend themselves or even understand what made their thoughts so "objectionable." Even when a post is subject to review, the fate of the post is still in the hands of the shadowy censors, and the poster is left without any information regarding what went wrong.

It's also frustrating to see that MSN disables comments on controversial topics. This is not only a disservice to readers who want to have thoughtful discussions, but it also seems to signal a lack of trust in their audience. While some discussions might get heated, censoring them just because they involve sensitive topics only leads to a lack of open discussions, which is not at all helpful.

MSN needs to recognize that discussions and comments on news articles are going to be passionate and sometimes controversial. It's unreasonable to expect readers to avoid speaking their minds on the issues they care about, just because it might offend someone. While threats or offensive content of any kind should not be accepted, MSN should permit open and unbiased conversations that allow all perspectives to be heard. It's time for MSN to give their readers the freedom and support to express their opinions and participate in healthy discourse.

Hello everyone! I wanted to share my thoughts about MSN.com. To be honest, I have had some frustrating experiences with the website. I've tried to leave reviews before, but they seem to be heavily moderated. It's strange to me that reviews can't be shared freely. Even when I try to offer constructive criticism, my reviews seem to be scrubbed. I don't understand why some people are allowed to spread lies or say negative things about certain political figures, but I can't share my honest opinion.

In my opinion, we should be able to leave reviews to air out grievances or praise. It's important to have an outlet and express thoughts. However, it seems that MSN.com doesn't want that kind of discourse. They seem to only want a certain type of content. I can appreciate that they want to create a community of positivity, but I don't believe that means shutting out certain voices and opinions. We should be free to share our thoughts, even if they don't always align with what others believe.

I do want to point out that MSN.com presents itself as a glamorous world, but that's not reality. There are real issues and problems that need to be addressed. I think it's important to have a diverse range of opinions on current events, politics, and news stories. However, it seems that MSN.com only allows certain news agencies to present their views. It's important to be exposed to different perspectives to form well-rounded opinions.

Overall, I think MSN.com has a bit of work to do in terms of how they handle reviews and their editorial coverage. We should be able to express ourselves freely and not feel silenced or censored. Thank you for letting me share my thoughts!

When it comes to msn.com, I have mixed feelings. On one hand, I find myself naturally gravitating towards it as my home page, but on the other hand, I can't help but feel a bit disappointed with what I find there. The site is inundated with clickbait stories, sensational headlines, and lists that require endless clicking just to find out basic information. Want to know which states have the best healthcare? Well, you'll have to click through 50 different pages just to find out, and even then, the ranking is somewhat suspect.

But these flaws pale in comparison to the real problem with msn.com: the comment section. On the surface, it seems like a great feature. After all, who doesn't love the ability to share their opinions and start discussions with other like-minded people? But the reality is far from ideal. Msn.com's heavy-handed moderation policy means that comments are subject to review, and certain innocuous words can trigger an automatic flagging system that leads to deletion. For example, mentioning certain political figures or groups can get your comment pulled without warning. Furthermore, right-wingers seem to flood the comment section with snide comments that subtly attack everyone. They know how to insult people without getting flagged, and it creates an environment that feels both hostile and unfriendly.

In conclusion, while msn.com has some attractive features, it falls short in many ways. The clickbait articles and endless lists are certainly frustrating, but it's the overbearing censorship and inappropriate comments that really make the site feel like a flea market of ideas. If you're looking for a site that encourages open dialogue and free expression, you'll have to look elsewhere.

Recently, I had an unfortunate experience while using MSN.com on my iPhone. Somewhere on the bottom right of the comment window, there lies an unnecessary and troublesome little "X". As I was typing, I accidentally clicked on it and everything that I had typed vanished in an instant. I was left feeling frustrated, disheartened, and confused. The question that is running through my mind is - why would anyone require such a feature? Why do we need to delete our entire comment with just one click? In any case, if someone does need to erase what they have typed, they could easily "select all" and swipe or use the backspace to wipe the slate clean. The "X" serves no practical purpose, and instead is causing problems for users.

Moreover, the placement of this "X" is a greater concern. It is dangerously close to where we type our comments which increases the frequency of accidental deletions. Sometimes when I need to edit or add something mid-comment, I might try to move my cursor back to where I left off, but my finger lands on the "X" and the comment is deleted. Perhaps, a pop-up confirming if we want to delete the comment could be implemented or even just moving the "X" to someplace less accessible would be beneficial.

It is important to note that there are some positives to using MSN as well. Recently, they reinstated the comment section along with the censor feature, which helps to block certain toxic text. Although the implementation of this feature is not perfect, it is a step in the right direction towards enabling productive dialogue on the platform.

Despite this, my patience is tested when a story is presented without a corresponding picture or video. This might sound like a minor issue, but it is frustrating when we are unable to visualize the story. Pictures or videos are often what make a story complete and we are deprived of that experience.

In conclusion, while there are some noteworthy aspects of the platform, the placement of this pesky "X" and the absence of visual aids to complement stories make it challenging to enjoy using MSN. I hope that they take our feedback and suggestions into account, and make necessary modifications that make our use of the platform more pleasant.

I recently had a terrible experience with Dupage Dodge Ram dealership located at 433 E-North Avenue. I purchased a 3500 tradesman diesel from them on September 18, 2018, not knowing that this was a dealership notorious for ripping off its customers. After signing all the necessary paperwork, I drove off with my new truck. But just a few weeks ago, during arbitration, I discovered that the dealership had committed forgery, forging my signature on two documents. Despite pointing out that the signature was not mine, the arbitrator passed judgment in favor of the dealer.

It was later revealed that Julie Strake, a finance manager at Dupage Dodge Ram, had created two documents and forged my signature on them. To get to the bottom of this, I hired James A. Green, a forensic document examiner, who confirmed that the documents were fraudulent and that my signature was indeed forged. I then reported the matter to the Glenn Dale Heights Police Department, who assigned Detective Nathan Szewczyk to take on my case. I provided him with the report from Mr. Green and a photo of one of the documents Strake created and signed with my name, which had a date on the right indicating it was created on September 19, 2018.

While I am not optimistic that the police will be able to get justice for me, I am determined to fight back and expose Dupage Dodge Ram's corrupt practices to the world. I have tried to post my experience on various platforms, but they keep taking it down. So, I have decided to share it here at the Washington Post and other places worldwide. Jim Spellman, the dealership owner, refuses to take responsibility for the crime they committed on September 19, 2018, in their own facility. I believe that they have robbed me of my hard-earned money and will not stop until they are held accountable for their actions.

When it comes to accessing news online, we all want to turn to reputable sources that provide us with unbiased, thought-provoking, and informative content. Unfortunately, the current state of news is quite polarized and divisive, which is why I was disappointed with my recent experience on MSN.

As someone who considers the definition of news to be "noteworthy information about recent or important events," I was disheartened to see that the majority of the headlines on MSN were filled with stories that only provoked anger and hostility among readers. It seemed like every other story was centered around race, politics, or segregation - topics that have long been known to cause tension and discord.

In addition to the inflammatory content, I noticed that many of the stories included pictures of politicians, wealthy citizens, and white supremacists that only seemed to glorify individuals who were focused on promoting their agendas. It was disheartening to see that so many stories centered around people who were divisive and focused on promoting their own interests, rather than providing readers with insightful and informative content.

One of the main issues I have with the current state of the news is that instead of uplifting readers or bringing people together, it seems to create more divisiveness in our already fragmented society. The constant bombardment of negative news and combative articles is creating a stressed and anxious reader base that is turning off from traditional news sources altogether.

I think it's time for news agencies to refocus their energy on providing neutral and positive content, rather than sensationalizing negative stories for clicks and views. It's important for people to have access to information that can help them improve their lives and build connections with other people.

Overall, I think MSN needs to work on improving the quality and content of their news stories. While it's important to cover important events happening around the world, it's equally important to present readers with a balance of positive content that can uplift and inspire. I hope that other news agencies follow suit and work towards creating a more positive, informed, and inspired society.

When it comes to msn.com, it's important to proceed with caution. While the site may offer a variety of news stories, it's important to note that many of them are simply click-bait, designed to draw in readers with attention-grabbing headlines. As a result, you may find yourself sifting through long lists of items or reading articles that promise juicy details but ultimately fail to deliver.

Perhaps even more frustrating is the comments section. While some readers may appreciate the ability to engage with others and share their opinions, the comments on msn.com are often filled with negativity, hate, and outright bigotry. Those who hold right-wing or conservative views seem to be particularly active in the comments, often attacking those who don't share their opinions and resorting to name-calling and personal attacks.

And speaking of right-wing views, it's worth noting that msn.com seems to offer a lot of content that caters to this perspective. If you're not interested in hearing from the likes of Trump or McConnell, you may find yourself frustrated by the sheer number of articles and stories that feature their perspectives. This can be especially frustrating when you're looking for news that represents a more balanced viewpoint.

Despite these flaws, msn.com can still be a useful source of news and information. Just be sure to approach the site with a critical eye and remember that not everything you read there may be entirely accurate or trustworthy. Ultimately, it's up to each individual reader to decide whether or not this site is worth their time and attention.

I wrote a review about MSN two years ago, and to my dismay, it has only gotten worse. In fact, I consider this company to be a real threat to the United States. It seems like our politicians in Washington want to dictate what is best for us instead of letting us decide for ourselves. This is a road that leads to disaster, as they gradually take away our freedom until we hardly have any left. They claim that it is all for our own good, but I assure you, it is not.

I believe that news companies should be held accountable when they report false information. We need to have more transparency, and internet news companies should allow feedback on every article they publish. Unfortunately, MSN is one of the worst when it comes to biased reporting. While watching an MSNBC weather program, the reporter made a political statement about our President, trying to blend the natural disaster with politics! This made me wonder, where is the ethics and the neutrality in reporting? News programs used to deliver both sides of the story and aim to be fair and accurate, but unfortunately, we have lost the sense of integrity and the responsibility that comes with this profession.

It’s important that we address this issue now because it will impact our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren for years to come. We are at a defining moment in our nation’s history, and we must push back against the corruption within our government. We cannot sit idly by and take the “mushroom treatment” anymore. This term refers to how they feed us crap and keep us in the dark.

It’s time we hold news stations accountable for their reporting and demand transparency in reporting. We must keep pushing for the truth no matter what. If we don't take action now, I believe that we may never get another chance to make things right. I urge everyone to contact their local news channels and demand that they report the facts and provide honest journalism. Let us not forget our voices and the power that we as people hold to make a positive change.

In this review, the writer expresses their dissatisfaction with MSN's apparent focus on offering opinions on political issues that are meant to undermine the credibility of a certain president. They also express frustration about the emphasis on events like Charlottesville that seem to promote hateful rhetoric propagated by certain organizations. The reviewer also highlights the political climate in their local area and the fact that they feel like their tax dollars are being wasted on issues that are not beneficial to them. They express disappointment that small businesses are being targeted by the government rather than being supported and encouraged. The overall tone of the review suggests that the writer feels like MSN is not meeting their expectations as a source of reliable news and unbiased journalism.

Once upon a time, MSN was a decent homepage. However, times have changed and it seems to have gone way left-wing with ridiculous amounts of ads and pop-ups that are virtually impossible to ignore even with blockers. The irony is not lost on me, as they are trying to make money while making a point of pushing liberal propaganda.

Just recently, I was looking to check my weather for the day, and clicked on the Weather Channel link. To my surprise, it showed that the temperature was only going to be 77 degrees with rain, yet when I looked outside it was completely clear and beautiful out. I know for a fact that it was supposed to be much warmer outside, and decided to check other weather sites. To my surprise, none of these other sites reported anything about rain or clouds and they all insisted it would be a warm 88 degrees. This further proved my suspicion that MSN can't even get the weather right.

Overall, the move towards a more liberal way of thinking has caused me to abandon MSN as my homepage. I now prefer to use Google or Bing, particularly because I quite enjoy their pictures and news tabs on the bottom of their homepage.

Recently, I have been bombarded with a constant flow of negative news and gruesome stories that have been appearing in my news feed day after day. It is starting to become overwhelming and affecting my mental health. I am finding it hard to cope with the sheer amount of unworthy news that is being pumped out and plastered across my devices, and it seems like there's no end to it.

I was initially drawn to MSN (msn.com) as a source of daily news updates and diversified news articles from around the world. However, the constant stream of negative and disturbing stories is starting to become too much, and I am finding that my stress levels are rising every time I open my newsfeed.

I understand that it is important to remain informed and be up-to-date with current events, but do we really need to hear about every little detail of every gruesome event that is happening in the world? Surely there are stories of human kindness, personal triumphs, and inspiring events that could also be shared.

In light of this, I have decided to remove MSN from my devices for the time being. It is time for me to focus on my mental health, and I refuse to let the overwhelming amount of negative news continue to drag me down. Perhaps in the future, MSN will rethink their approach to news articles and provide more uplifting and inspiring stories to their readers.

When I first stumbled upon MSN (msn.com), I was excited to explore this new browser. However, I soon realized that it bombarded me with advertisements and sponsored content. I understand that it takes money to keep a website like this running, but the incessant ads became overwhelming. Nonetheless, my major issue with MSN was their constant push towards trying out Swoggi. I finally caved in and decided to give it a shot, only to discover that you have to pay for points to bid. Essentially, you're shelling out money for minuscule chances to spend even more money. But to make matters worse, I noticed the presence of fake news that was tarnishing my daily read. The content featured quotes from famous people that simply weren't true, and this misinformation left a bad taste in my mouth. Overall, I would rate MSN 2 out of 5 stars. I cannot recommend it solely due to their pushy tactics and misleading content.

I must express my absolute disappointment with the MSN news website. For starters, the quality of journalism is quite poor, with articles written in a language that is barely coherent. The sentences lack structure and coherence, leaving readers puzzled and confused. As an avid follower of current events, it's quite frustrating that I need to read the same article multiple times to comprehend it fully.

Moreover, the video player is a total mess and annoyingly placed right in the middle of articles. It's loaded with content that appears irrelevant to what is being discussed, and it takes forever to load, making the experience frustrating and tiresome. The website also features articles that are incredibly short, which begs the question, what's the point of writing them in the first place?

The website design is an eyesore, and it appears as though the publishers put little to no effort into it. The home page looks chaotic, with multiple news stories vying for attention, making it challenging to find what you're looking for. To add insult to injury, the website is filled with annoying clickbait articles that are a complete waste of time.

I'd give it a 1/5 rating, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. It's baffling that such a reputable company can produce something so terrible. As for me, I'll continue my search for a more reliable and professional news website.

MSM (msn.com), a once reliable source of news and information, has unfortunately taken a turn for the worse. In the past, readers could easily navigate through articles and gain valuable insight into world events. Today, however, clicking on an article means having to sit through a 90 second advertisement that not only wastes time but also uses up precious data if you're not connected to WiFi.

The tracking tactics employed by MSN are undeniably atrocious. Readers may find themselves inundated with articles and advertisements related to the subject matter of a particular article they chose to read. This can be overwhelming and frustrating, especially if the reader is searching for specific information or is simply trying to scroll through the days' headlines.

Adding to the woes of MSN is their insufferable political undertones and opinions masquerading as "news". This type of reporting is biased, unprofessional, and disrespectful to readers who rely on traditional journalism's tenets of impartiality and nonpartisanship. These fails are truly appalling.

As a result, many former MSN loyalists have abandoned the site. Some even go as far as to remove MSM from their homepage or limit their access simply because they feel the online news source is no longer reliable. It is indeed disappointing to see MSN deteriorate from what was once a reputable source of news and information. This said the site is still visited by many who are saddened by the ongoing decline.

As someone who spends a fair amount of time browsing the internet, I must say that MSN (msn.com) has been a website that I have frequented in the past. However, as of late, I have become increasingly dissatisfied with their services.

First and foremost, the abundance of advertisements on their website has become overwhelming. The site is cluttered with roll-over ads, autoplaying videos, and other annoying formats that make the user experience frustrating. Not only do these ads slow down the site, they also hog up bandwidth, causing the page to become unstable at times.

While I understand that MSN needs to generate revenue, the amount of ads on their site has become beyond what is reasonable. It is as if they care more about making money than providing a user-friendly experience. This has led me to consider finding a new website to replace MSN as my go-to for news stories, sports updates, and entertainment news.

In conclusion, if you are someone who values a browsing experience that is free of excessive ads and frustrating slowdowns, I recommend steering clear of MSN. While they may still provide some decent content, the sheer volume of advertisements takes away from any potential enjoyment.

The popular email provider, MSN, claims to filter out spam emails from your main inbox, which sounds like a great idea in theory. However, the reality of the situation is far from ideal. Instead of getting rid of unwanted emails entirely, MSN simply places them into the Junk Mailbox folder, which is not only inconvenient but also revolting. The Junk Mailbox is often filled with disgusting advertising emails that bombard the user's email by the hundreds on a daily basis.

This can lead to a plethora of issues, including the possibility of missing out on important emails such as those from a doctor, close friends, or even a trusted company that you may have signed up with. It's quite a frustrating experience to have to scour through a hefty amount of unwanted emails just to find the important ones.

Surprisingly, MSN has been accused of this practice for years, yet, they have taken no steps towards rectifying the problem. It seems their bottom line profits of advertising revenue are more important than user satisfaction. Even a simple solution such as allowing users to create their own customizable filters seems to be out of the question.

If you happen to take a few days off from checking your email, you can expect to return to an overwhelmingly cluttered Junk Mailbox containing over 1000 filth-ridden emails. This is not only annoying but also disgusting, and it's high time that MSN takes responsibility and figures out a way to minimize this situation. Ultimately, the experience of using MSN is less than satisfactory, and it's hard not to feel like you are fighting a losing battle with managing your email inbox.

The AI that moderates comments will block you from saying the phrase "Why are you" regardless of what comes after it. It prevents you from making comments about race, even when the article is specifically about race. It blocks comments that I honestly still cannot figure out a reason for. I don't think there even are human moderators involved, because it will prevent you from even posting a comment it has determined is inappropriate, never giving a human other than you a chance to even review it. It's an absurdly overreactive system, especially for a media company that posts inflammatory news articles and then facilitates discussion of these extremely polarizing topics. Apparently, everyone is just supposed to talk about how much we love puppies and kittens in the comments after an article about a mass shooting or discrimination.

As a frequent user of the internet, I unfortunately find myself constantly stumbling upon MSN News headlines. At my place of work, it seems impossible to avoid the sensationalist claims that MSN News likes to push forward. More and more, I find myself questioning the accuracy of their reporting and the integrity of their journalism. It's disheartening to see such an influential news source fail to uphold ethical standards and instead rely on lies and deceit to gain clicks.

I firmly believe that a free press is essential to a democratic society, but that freedom should not include the right to broadcast falsehoods to the masses. The team at MSN News seems to have forgotten their responsibility to provide factual information to their readers, instead opting for sensational headlines and unverified claims. This is a dangerous path for any news outlet to take, and only serves to undermine the trust that should exist between the press and the public they serve.

In addition to their lack of journalistic integrity, it's disappointing to see that MSN News is unwilling to correct their mistakes and retract false information. Rather than admitting to their errors and taking steps to correct their reporting, they simply move on to new lies to replace the old ones. This creates a dangerous cycle of misinformation that only serves to further erode public trust in journalism and the media at large.

As citizens, it's our responsibility to demand more from our news sources. We should hold MSN News accountable for their lack of ethics and subpar reporting, and advocate for a return to accurate, unbiased journalism. In a world where information is readily available and information overload is a constant threat, it's more important than ever to ensure that the information we consume can be trusted.