The complaint has been investigated and
resolved to the customer's satisfaction


This Is A Case Of Criminalization Of Consumer Justice In The Indian City Of Kanpur. The two Consumer Forums In Kanpur Have Been Made Sources of Income By The Corrupt Judges And Members. Ironically The U. P. State Forum ( SCDRC ) And The National Forum (NCDRC) Both Have Failed To Develop Any Mechanism That Can Check The Nefarious Activities Of The Corrupt judges Who Are Eating Away Consumer Protection Act-1986 & 2002 Like Termites. Hereunder, There Is Description Of A Mind Blowing Case Showing How The Corrupt Forum Judges In Kanpur Entered Into Financial Collusion With O.P.s And Then Distorted The Entire Theme And Process Of C.P.A.-1986 To Enrich Themselves By Playing Fraud With The Government, With The Consumers, And With The Tax-Payers’ Money.

The current forum president of Kanpur City, Mr. A. H. Ansari, had masterminded in operating a fake consumer forum of district Kanpur dehat, from 08 august 2005 to 3 march, 2006, by installing an unauthorized person—Mr. Ranvir Singh---on the coveted seat of Kanpur Dehat Forum. Mr. Ranvir Singh started acting and personating as a true forum head, and went on operating the forum like his personal Private Limited Company for 7 – 8 months in succession. Even dozens of advocates who had deposed before this fraudster on behalf of their clients were also cheated as they were unaware that Mr. Ranvir Singh was not the legally appointed authority at that time. This agent of Mr. A. H. Ansari shamelessly took bribes from countless litigants, and passed illegal orders in his own handwriting ( but never put his own signatures under the written orders ). Mr. A. H. Ansari had handed over Kanpur Dehat Forum to Mr. Ranbir Singh just like a dishonest tenant sublets a rented premises to a third party. Under the illegally written and passed orders by Mr. Ranvir Singh, the signatures of two other fraud and all-time absentee members--Ms. Durgesh Nandini Katiyar & Mr. K. L. Dwivedi---(who were also having calculated intentions of dishonesty and cheating the consumers and the Government alike)---never attended the forum proceedings, but fraudulently they continued to draw salaries and perks unchecked. Their signatures on the case files were used to be taken from their respective homes at night time. The height of dishonesty was that—that one of the members---Ms. Durgesh Nandini Katiyar---was clandestinely rendering two services at the same time, and she was also drawing two salaries and allowances. On the one hand she was working as a full time lecturer at Municipal Girls Inter College, Kanpur, and on the other hand she had also manipulated full time membership of Kanpur Dehat Forum with the shameful connivance of Mr. A. H. Ansari and Ranvir Singh. It was Mr. A. H. Ansari who was regularly allowing Ms. Durgesh Nandini Katiyar to draw salary illegally from the Govt. Account despite knowing well that this fraud lady member had neither come to the forum even for a single day right from day No. 1 of her illegal appointment, nor she was ever able to come there ( as she was involved in teaching work somewhere else, from morning till evening ). In the month of September 2006, The Hon’ble Governor of the state of Uttar Pradesh, following the receipt of a complaint, dismissed this fraud lady member from service. But before being dismissed, this Lady-420 had severely harmed countless honest litigants by putting her illegal signatures in as many case files, under the dictations of Mr. A. H. Ansari and Ranvir Singh. It seems difficult to understand as to why SCDRC ( Lucknow ) and the U. P. Govt. failed to calculate the responsibility of the officiating judge of the forum, Mr. A. H. Ansari, who was deliberately allowing this lady member to draw salary from the Govt. coffers despite her all time absence in the forum ?

It is to be noted that during the period when Kanpur Dehat Forum was under the illegal occupation of Mr. Ranvir Singh, Mr. A. H. Ansari was made the officiating President of this forum by the U.P. Govt. But making blatant misuse of his power, Mr. Ansari, in a cryptic manner, installed his fraudulent agent—Ranvir Singh in his own place. Every litigant and the advocate who deposed before this agent of Mr. Ansari considered him as a legally appointed forum head, but in reality he was not.

If the misdemeanors and criminal modus operandi of the corrupt forum heads, etc., become known to the public then entire Indian nation will be shocked, and at least Clause 4 and Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act-1986 have to be re-written, and criminal case under Sections 409, 419, 466, 468, and 120-B of I. P. C. would have to be registered immediately against the above named fraudsters.

A formal complaint against the criminal misdeeds of judge A. H. Ansari and his cotrie has been lodged with NCDRC, New Delhi, and an inquiry has also been instituted to unearth the unprecedented consumer forum SCAM. But sadly, Mr. A. H. Ansari---the most corrupt judge in India’s history of consumer justice---is still in service, sitting regularly ( although only for 15 minutes ) on the coveted seat of the President of the Forum, and is deciding the fates of gullible litigating consumers with corrupt intentions.

In the Kanpur Dehat Forum Case No. 269/2000 ( Sarabjeet Singh Johar v/s M/s Anand Properties & 5 Others ) the corrupt judges shamelessly dragged on a simple Ex-Parte case for 6 long years despite reserving its judgment at several occasions earlier ( in the year 2000 and 2001, etc. ). Eventually, the erstwhile fraud judge—Ranvir Singh-- on 03-10-2006, delivered his corrupt, absurd, and senseless judgment in favour of those O.P.s ( total No. six, that included three fraud property dealers ) who had not even filed their Written Statements, and had returned the forum notices with the remark : “Refused To Accept”. This type of cruel, crude, and corrupt judgment could not have been expected even from a consumer forum of any of the 100 % corrupt countries in the world.


  • Gs
    G. S. JOHAR Feb 01, 2009

    I express my hearty thanks for the highly moralistic, bold, and truthful comment posted by Advocate Gibran Akhtar Khan on this matter.

    G. S. JOHAR

    1 Votes
  • Gibran Akhtar Khan Jan 29, 2009

    Dt: 29/01/09
    Really it is a bizarre incident in the History of Consumer Protection . The very Act ie; Consumer Protection Act itself suggests that it is meant for the protection of the Consumers and if people like Mr A. H. Ansari will behave in such a reprehensible manner this will create illusion into the minds of the people that what the term "Justice" really connotes. People like Mr. Ansari shall never be referred to as Judge and the word "Judge" preceding his name shall be deleted for all times to come.
    'Shame Mr. Ansari Shame"

    -: Gibran Akhtar Khan
    High Court, Lucknow Bench

    0 Votes
  • Gs
    G. S. JOHAR Mar 16, 2008

    Yet another ( most latest ) case of fraud and forgery in Kanpur Dehat District Consumer Forum of India

    This new report may be read along with my earlier complaint titled “CONSUMER FORUM RACKET IN KANPUR (INDIA)” ['consumer Justice' — CONSUMER FORUM RACKET IN KANPUR (INDIA) ]

    It appears that only those people who expert in committing fraud, forgery, deception, and injustice, are selectively appointed in Kanpur Dehat District consumer forum.

    The latest case of serial fraud going on in Kanpur Dehat forum came to light on FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 2008, and it was also reported in the press the very next day. Thus, on March 15, 2008, India’s leading Hindi daily, Dainik Jagran (Kanpur), reported ( on Page 9 ) a news titled “Forum Adhyakchh key farzee hastakchhar sey vakeelon kaa hangamaa” ( Advocates raise hue and cry on the forged signatures of the forum president ). In this news item it is reported that on Friday, March 14, all the courts of Kanpur were ordered to be closed down following the sudden death of an advocate. The forum president of Kanpur Dehat district was also absent on that day. But in order to give some undue relief to a plaintiff, Mr. Pradeep Narain Srivastav, the only one forum member who was present on that day---Mr. Gajendra Singh Sengar, by misusing his authority, not only passed a forged order for issuing a warrant against Kanpur Development Authority ( K.D.A. ), but himself put forged signature of the forum president ( Mr. Narain Singh ) also. The KDA’s advocate, Mr. Indivar Bajpai, when learnt of this grave anomaly against his client ( KDA ), became furious and highly agitated. Mr. Indivar Bajpai was aghast to learn that due to sudden closure of the forum on March 14 when new dates were given to all the other forum cases, why his client’s case was taken up selectively for passing a forged order under the fake signatures of the president. Sensing corruption and fraud, Mr. Bajpai immediately wrote to Justice Bhanwar Singh—Chairman of U. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ( UPSCDRC ), at Lucknow, demanding the filing of a police report against the forum member who played fraud against the Consumer Protection Act. Many other advocates including Mr. Surendra Bajpai, Mr. Mohammad Saeed, Mr. Atma Ram Misra, also demanded similar action against the fraudulent tactics being played in the Kanpur Dehat District Forum.

    0 Votes

Post your comment

    By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions


    Unhappy consumers gather online at and have already logged thousands of complaints.
    If you see dozens of complaints about a certain company on ComplaintsBoard, walk away.
    One of the largest consumer sites online. Posting here your concerns means good exposure for your issues.
    A consumer site aimed at exposing unethical companies and business practices.
    ComplaintsBoard is a good source for product and company gripes from especially dissatisfied people.
    You'll definitely get some directions on how customer service can best solve your problem.
    Do a little research on the seller. Visit consumer complaint websites like ComplaintsBoard.