MSN

In this review, the writer expresses their dissatisfaction with MSN's apparent focus on offering opinions on political issues that are meant to undermine the credibility of a certain president. They also express frustration about the emphasis on events like Charlottesville that seem to promote hateful rhetoric propagated by certain organizations. The reviewer also highlights the political climate in their local area and the fact that they feel like their tax dollars are being wasted on issues that are not beneficial to them. They express disappointment that small businesses are being targeted by the government rather than being supported and encouraged. The overall tone of the review suggests that the writer feels like MSN is not meeting their expectations as a source of reliable news and unbiased journalism.

Once upon a time, MSN was a decent homepage. However, times have changed and it seems to have gone way left-wing with ridiculous amounts of ads and pop-ups that are virtually impossible to ignore even with blockers. The irony is not lost on me, as they are trying to make money while making a point of pushing liberal propaganda.

Just recently, I was looking to check my weather for the day, and clicked on the Weather Channel link. To my surprise, it showed that the temperature was only going to be 77 degrees with rain, yet when I looked outside it was completely clear and beautiful out. I know for a fact that it was supposed to be much warmer outside, and decided to check other weather sites. To my surprise, none of these other sites reported anything about rain or clouds and they all insisted it would be a warm 88 degrees. This further proved my suspicion that MSN can't even get the weather right.

Overall, the move towards a more liberal way of thinking has caused me to abandon MSN as my homepage. I now prefer to use Google or Bing, particularly because I quite enjoy their pictures and news tabs on the bottom of their homepage.

Recently, I have been bombarded with a constant flow of negative news and gruesome stories that have been appearing in my news feed day after day. It is starting to become overwhelming and affecting my mental health. I am finding it hard to cope with the sheer amount of unworthy news that is being pumped out and plastered across my devices, and it seems like there's no end to it.

I was initially drawn to MSN (msn.com) as a source of daily news updates and diversified news articles from around the world. However, the constant stream of negative and disturbing stories is starting to become too much, and I am finding that my stress levels are rising every time I open my newsfeed.

I understand that it is important to remain informed and be up-to-date with current events, but do we really need to hear about every little detail of every gruesome event that is happening in the world? Surely there are stories of human kindness, personal triumphs, and inspiring events that could also be shared.

In light of this, I have decided to remove MSN from my devices for the time being. It is time for me to focus on my mental health, and I refuse to let the overwhelming amount of negative news continue to drag me down. Perhaps in the future, MSN will rethink their approach to news articles and provide more uplifting and inspiring stories to their readers.

When I first stumbled upon MSN (msn.com), I was excited to explore this new browser. However, I soon realized that it bombarded me with advertisements and sponsored content. I understand that it takes money to keep a website like this running, but the incessant ads became overwhelming. Nonetheless, my major issue with MSN was their constant push towards trying out Swoggi. I finally caved in and decided to give it a shot, only to discover that you have to pay for points to bid. Essentially, you're shelling out money for minuscule chances to spend even more money. But to make matters worse, I noticed the presence of fake news that was tarnishing my daily read. The content featured quotes from famous people that simply weren't true, and this misinformation left a bad taste in my mouth. Overall, I would rate MSN 2 out of 5 stars. I cannot recommend it solely due to their pushy tactics and misleading content.

I must express my absolute disappointment with the MSN news website. For starters, the quality of journalism is quite poor, with articles written in a language that is barely coherent. The sentences lack structure and coherence, leaving readers puzzled and confused. As an avid follower of current events, it's quite frustrating that I need to read the same article multiple times to comprehend it fully.

Moreover, the video player is a total mess and annoyingly placed right in the middle of articles. It's loaded with content that appears irrelevant to what is being discussed, and it takes forever to load, making the experience frustrating and tiresome. The website also features articles that are incredibly short, which begs the question, what's the point of writing them in the first place?

The website design is an eyesore, and it appears as though the publishers put little to no effort into it. The home page looks chaotic, with multiple news stories vying for attention, making it challenging to find what you're looking for. To add insult to injury, the website is filled with annoying clickbait articles that are a complete waste of time.

I'd give it a 1/5 rating, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. It's baffling that such a reputable company can produce something so terrible. As for me, I'll continue my search for a more reliable and professional news website.

MSM (msn.com), a once reliable source of news and information, has unfortunately taken a turn for the worse. In the past, readers could easily navigate through articles and gain valuable insight into world events. Today, however, clicking on an article means having to sit through a 90 second advertisement that not only wastes time but also uses up precious data if you're not connected to WiFi.

The tracking tactics employed by MSN are undeniably atrocious. Readers may find themselves inundated with articles and advertisements related to the subject matter of a particular article they chose to read. This can be overwhelming and frustrating, especially if the reader is searching for specific information or is simply trying to scroll through the days' headlines.

Adding to the woes of MSN is their insufferable political undertones and opinions masquerading as "news". This type of reporting is biased, unprofessional, and disrespectful to readers who rely on traditional journalism's tenets of impartiality and nonpartisanship. These fails are truly appalling.

As a result, many former MSN loyalists have abandoned the site. Some even go as far as to remove MSM from their homepage or limit their access simply because they feel the online news source is no longer reliable. It is indeed disappointing to see MSN deteriorate from what was once a reputable source of news and information. This said the site is still visited by many who are saddened by the ongoing decline.

As someone who spends a fair amount of time browsing the internet, I must say that MSN (msn.com) has been a website that I have frequented in the past. However, as of late, I have become increasingly dissatisfied with their services.

First and foremost, the abundance of advertisements on their website has become overwhelming. The site is cluttered with roll-over ads, autoplaying videos, and other annoying formats that make the user experience frustrating. Not only do these ads slow down the site, they also hog up bandwidth, causing the page to become unstable at times.

While I understand that MSN needs to generate revenue, the amount of ads on their site has become beyond what is reasonable. It is as if they care more about making money than providing a user-friendly experience. This has led me to consider finding a new website to replace MSN as my go-to for news stories, sports updates, and entertainment news.

In conclusion, if you are someone who values a browsing experience that is free of excessive ads and frustrating slowdowns, I recommend steering clear of MSN. While they may still provide some decent content, the sheer volume of advertisements takes away from any potential enjoyment.

The popular email provider, MSN, claims to filter out spam emails from your main inbox, which sounds like a great idea in theory. However, the reality of the situation is far from ideal. Instead of getting rid of unwanted emails entirely, MSN simply places them into the Junk Mailbox folder, which is not only inconvenient but also revolting. The Junk Mailbox is often filled with disgusting advertising emails that bombard the user's email by the hundreds on a daily basis.

This can lead to a plethora of issues, including the possibility of missing out on important emails such as those from a doctor, close friends, or even a trusted company that you may have signed up with. It's quite a frustrating experience to have to scour through a hefty amount of unwanted emails just to find the important ones.

Surprisingly, MSN has been accused of this practice for years, yet, they have taken no steps towards rectifying the problem. It seems their bottom line profits of advertising revenue are more important than user satisfaction. Even a simple solution such as allowing users to create their own customizable filters seems to be out of the question.

If you happen to take a few days off from checking your email, you can expect to return to an overwhelmingly cluttered Junk Mailbox containing over 1000 filth-ridden emails. This is not only annoying but also disgusting, and it's high time that MSN takes responsibility and figures out a way to minimize this situation. Ultimately, the experience of using MSN is less than satisfactory, and it's hard not to feel like you are fighting a losing battle with managing your email inbox.

The AI that moderates comments will block you from saying the phrase "Why are you" regardless of what comes after it. It prevents you from making comments about race, even when the article is specifically about race. It blocks comments that I honestly still cannot figure out a reason for. I don't think there even are human moderators involved, because it will prevent you from even posting a comment it has determined is inappropriate, never giving a human other than you a chance to even review it. It's an absurdly overreactive system, especially for a media company that posts inflammatory news articles and then facilitates discussion of these extremely polarizing topics. Apparently, everyone is just supposed to talk about how much we love puppies and kittens in the comments after an article about a mass shooting or discrimination.

As a frequent user of the internet, I unfortunately find myself constantly stumbling upon MSN News headlines. At my place of work, it seems impossible to avoid the sensationalist claims that MSN News likes to push forward. More and more, I find myself questioning the accuracy of their reporting and the integrity of their journalism. It's disheartening to see such an influential news source fail to uphold ethical standards and instead rely on lies and deceit to gain clicks.

I firmly believe that a free press is essential to a democratic society, but that freedom should not include the right to broadcast falsehoods to the masses. The team at MSN News seems to have forgotten their responsibility to provide factual information to their readers, instead opting for sensational headlines and unverified claims. This is a dangerous path for any news outlet to take, and only serves to undermine the trust that should exist between the press and the public they serve.

In addition to their lack of journalistic integrity, it's disappointing to see that MSN News is unwilling to correct their mistakes and retract false information. Rather than admitting to their errors and taking steps to correct their reporting, they simply move on to new lies to replace the old ones. This creates a dangerous cycle of misinformation that only serves to further erode public trust in journalism and the media at large.

As citizens, it's our responsibility to demand more from our news sources. We should hold MSN News accountable for their lack of ethics and subpar reporting, and advocate for a return to accurate, unbiased journalism. In a world where information is readily available and information overload is a constant threat, it's more important than ever to ensure that the information we consume can be trusted.

MSN Home page 09/04/2018 - Did not find one objective article worth ones time. Woodward article was a pathetic attempt to do something - pretty much saying the president of the United States's personnel did not jump high enough when Woodward said jump so he was releasing a book skewed the Woodward way - basically MSN's attempt to tell the public what? You maybe another article or two one knew were going to be negative slants on Woodward's book release - I am finally convinced that your objective is "fake news". Pretty lame day on your website with the rest of the main pages appearing to be pretty much fluff. You evidently no longer have any integrity left - what are you?

Switching my main page to something else - CNN proved they suck and MSN...

MSN is so irresponsible to allow such garbage on it's news pages. The idea is to get news to people not the lies & drivel that are being posted as truth. The Washington POst article was broadly renounced as pure anti-trump and leaks from someone who will soon be in jail.

How about posting truths? How about sticking to tech? Why are you ### with the American people putting millennial's socialistic hoaxes on as new or truths.

It might fly in California, but adults like myself who value a dollar and understand some of the harsher realities of the world would appreciate news. And, that doesn't mean Trump Fake News; stories on the kardashians; stories on poopy-pants Hillary who lost; I think you get my gist.

That's my complaint. Your tactics tear the US apart. Your way lost in the election. Respect ALL of your customers not just pink hats who BLEW the chance to negotiate a great platform for women.

I am a fiscal conservative with a liberal social agenda. I'm a capitalist not a communist.

Please post truths vs lies by NYT and WAPO.

I have no recollection of subscribing to msn features - but am receiving 100's of emails per month offering products from viagra to subjects approaching pornographic materials

Is impossible to unsubscribe from these adds - they only come back under a different email address

Have contacted viagra directly - and they state they have no control.

Msn should be embarrassed to have their name associated with some of these promotional features.

How do I unsubscribe from msm features? How do I stop msn from providing my name to others?

Am so annoyed that I am considering another email service