Airline may reimburse subject to maximum weight of economy class (see your ticket) in your case.
there is a cheaper solution than a "court", for justice in Canada.
The legal issue is DENIED BOARDING in your case.
There are no PNR numbers, ticket numbers, time, dates of the flights.
So the complaint is groundless.
There are no any objective prove of a damage resulted from the airline service.
The compliant, as it is, looks groundless.
There are no PNR numbers, ticket numbers, time, dates of the flights.
The possible passenger's report shows just emotions, which are normal reaction, in amy travel.
So the complaint is groundless.
The are no facts, which show any losses.
The airline gave the explanations, according to you, and the airline must not give any additional explanation for you.
The complaint looks groundless at this stage.
You can may a legal claim in the local disputed authority.
The are no facts, which show any losses resulted from the British airways.
The agent of the airline gave the explanations, according to you, and the airline must not give any additional explanation for you.
The author may file a legal claim towards the local dispute authority.
The complaint looks groundless at this stage.
The are no facts, which produce any losses, which produce the parties of the dispute.
The unidentified refunded according to you, and the airline must not give any additional explanation for you.
The complaint looks groundless at this stage.
There are no PNR numbers, ticket numbers, time, dates of the canclled flights.
The possible passenger's report shows emotions, which are normal reaction, in amy travel.
So the complaint looks groundless in such form.
The author is entitled to get a reimbursment by filing the complaint.
There are no time/ dates of the reservation & complaint towards the hotel''s agent
The possible passenger's report shows just emotions, which are normal reaction, in amy travel.
It is not clear, did the auther say "good bye" to the paid amount from his credit card and he does not want a legal satisfaction.
So the complaint looks legally groundless at this stage.
There are no any dates/ time, flight numbers/ objective incorrect acts of the airline, prove of a damage resulted from the airline service.
The compliant, as it is, looks groundless completely.
It is not clear the full reservation, which must include flight number.
The passenger did not show that the BA confirmed exact the seat for him in the eticket / PNR / reservation.
So the claims, as it is, looks groundless.
The wish of a passenger for meals is just a request for a service.
It is not clear that the BA has confirmed the exact meal in the PNR / reservation for the passenger.
As well there are no flight date/ fligh time / fligh numbers .
So the claims, as it is, looks groundless completely.
The are no facts, which show any emotional or material loss resulted from the British airways acts:
no PNR fligt numbers / flight dates / request confirmation by the British airways
The British airways as well as any other airline is not respionsible for passenger' wish to refuse to travel irrespective of the amount paid..
The complaint looks groundless completely at this stage.
The are no facts, which show any losses resulted from the British airways / agent's acts:
the author failed to show the dates/tyme of travel / flight numbers / class numbers.
The agent is not obliged to provide the exact class of the service due to a passenger''s wish only.
The time requered for the distribution of seats depends of the data flow between different reservation systems.
The agent gave the explanations, according to the author.
Neither the British airways or their agent must not give any additional explanation for you due to the lack of class seating possibilities..
The author show different calculations which are not connected to any exact loss.
The complaint looks groundless completely.
The complaint looks chaotic:
it is unclear how an unknown service provider is connected with the British airwways;
there are no time / date / flight number of travel;
there are no any prove that the Britisg airwways had canceled any flight.
The is unclear, which loss had been suffered by a passenger due to unclear the British airwways actions.
The complaint looks groundless at this stage.
The passenger has a good chance to get a reimbursement from Qatar airways due to the delayed flight,
if the presented facts are true and the passenger fills the complaint correctly, leaving unnesssary emotions, which are 3/4 of the complaint, away.
Despite the author had not expressed the detailes of the flights,
the complaint of the author have good and reasobale grounds for the reimbursemnt.
The passenger did not formulate his claim towards the air carrier correctly.
Currently the passeenger does not know, how he can fo it.
Also the passenger's issue, that the passenger took the boarding pass against the passenger's will still looks as a dispute.
There are chances for the partial compensation in the passenger's case.
Dear lady,
it is a public board, where different passengers from all the world exchange their views on airlines servcies.
You presented no facts, which show that the LH airline is guilty of any violation of any artaicle of the contract with you, as the LH apassenger.
Such type of the complaint against the LH airline is grounless completely.
Dear bhai Kuldeep081: "NEVER SAY NEVER".
You did not see the rules of the exact e-tciket, which the agent had to issue to you.
in order to commence a dispute you need to prove that the agent's site was out of service in the time you had commnced to use them .
You do not have such aproval (scan of the screen) or any other violation of the contract by the agent.
As a result, no facts, no arguments, no grounds to complaint against the agent.
Think again, dear bhai Kuldeep081.
Dear muslim brother Asif
1. The air carrrier has canclled their 14Ap2017 flight and informed you any how.
You, as a passenger holding the e-ticket, must not know, and the airline must not reaport the reason of the cancellation
to any passeenger. You can obtain the detailed tech/marketing information regarding the cancceled air carrier flight of DXB from the aviation authority in the UAE.
Again: the flight is cancelled - only this info is important for a passenger.
2. The is a private law all over the world, exept in developing countries, like Ukraine.
Each case is individual in your relation with an air carrier: y
ou can not rely on what other say in their, not yours, personal affairs with an air carrier.
Even in each country, where shariah is a constitutional law (Lybia, Tunisia).
3. Your frind must put his eyes into the air carrier electronic ticket. The air carrier might issue the rules of the transprtation for each ticket. If not, that your friend is entitled to fill a legal claim to [airline / civil aviation authority / court / etc].
Godd luck brother!
Dear muslim brother Mahmoud Amin,
You did not state the correct facts:the date and the time of the departing flight.
You, probbaly, pre-registered yourself in internet for the flight.
The airline issued the electronic boarding pass to your e-mail addres.
DID you come before the time, which is sttaed in the boarding pass / or in your e-ticket?
DID the checin counter of the airline was opned for the registration before the final time,
which is staed in the boarding pass / or in your e-ticket?
If the answer on both (1) two questions "NO", than the airline was entitled to refuse of your air transportation.
Otherwise, you are entitled to fill a complaint and to get a reimbursemnt from an airline for their groundless refusal to allow on board .
*******************************************************************************************
The wording "a lot of money" means zero meney.
The emotional wording "rude" is groundless with airlines [dont fly, seat at home]
*******************************************************************************************
Clear, brother?
dear Laura Beddis,
1. The formal complaint must have an addressee. Your message does not have it.
2. The formal complaint must have a sender's ID and the adress. Your message does not have it.
So your mesage is not a formal complaint.
"The [cabin crew] supervisor Lloyd Chew came to you", "he offered us a voucher", but you had refused the Malsyan airlines beatiful services by leaving your seat, which is not allowed without the crew permission.
Next time you will remember that you are not a single passenger for the 5-stars wonderfull Malasyan airlines.
