What kind of news is this when instead of news you hear their opinions, that's not interesting to anyone? Too...
There someone who is using the CNN name to scam people. They sent me a gmail saying that I won rhe Nigeria lotto that I need to send then a tenth of the winnings to collect. I was wanting to contact you to let your company know about it. And maybe warn people about it. They are trying to get $654 from me. Please check on it. I live in Rock Hill SOUTH CAROLINA USA. Thank you
His bias has been over the line for a long time, but labeling me as 'overprotective' of my daughter is the end. His ideology has skewed his thinking to the point what is coming out of his mouth is idiotic, intolerant and insulting. He complains about Trump being on Twitter and he goes and says something like this. Is Cuomo hoping to pick up the Nambla endorsement for a political run?
I wish to complain about two of your paid contributors. Rick Santorum is on video calling President Obama a government nig-----when he stopped midsentence. We can all guess what nig----- mean't. Also, Sheriff Paul Babeu you have had on talking about border law and security. Here in Arizona he had a male illegal lover from Mexico, and is on tape threatening to deport the illegal if he made their love affair public knowledge. His credibility on border issues is worthless IMO. If you vetted either of these contributors, then you mad a poor decision to have Santorum comment on race and Babeu to give commentary on illegals
Your reporter asked President Trump today if calling CNN fake news is not corroding the confidence that people have in the news (or something along that line). You bet it is, because your organization's constant attacks, hatred, and dishonesty has by itself lost the trust of the people, including me, who used to regularly watch you. Your company is so far in the tank for liberal progressives and so much against the other Americans it is disgusting. Your reporting and that of other networks is what is whipping liberal progressives into a violent frenzy. I assume it is for ratings because it is not responsible news reporting when you run violence and hatred all day long. There is a huge block of America that are not like that, and you fail to report on them at all, because it does not produce ratings. You cannot seem to see the forest through the trees. You've lost credibility. I'm sure you do know when you report that Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary, it is because most of those votes are out of the liberal progressive state of California. I'd love to watch CNN again, but not until you get some balance back into your reporting, instead of leading (instead of reporting about) a culture war.
The comments of Van Jones last night after the Donald Trump victory were extremely OFFENSIVE!!! He call thi...
For the past 7 years, I have been reading the news on Cnn.com, every day, if not more than once a day.
I'm writing to tell you goodbye. I am disgusted with the one-sided reporting coverage of the race for president. Your reporters attack the GOP nominee in every pathetic opportunity they can think of.
"Melania Trump wants to stop cyber-bullying, but she doesn't acknowlege that her husband is a cyber-bully."
Pathetic, and childish. I'm sure I'm not the only person who is done with you either. Say goodbye to a HUGE portion of your audience, because people like me are permanently changing the channel.
I used to watch CNN in the past. It was great and very informative. But things changed and there's not much left from the good old CNN. Now there's noting but lies, they sold themselves. CNN is very dishonest, they are corrupt and will do everything for money!
I don't want to watch this channel anymore and all the people I know say the same thing! CNN now is nothing but propaganda!
As a student of statistics during my former university years, I find it extremely misleading of CNN not to disclose the number of people who are questioned on any given poll. To the uninitiated and the average American watching your news programs, it would seem that a huge majority of republicans or democrats or whoever the case may be, have participated in those polls. We who are more aware, know that perhaps 500 people or maybe even 5000 people may have participated and an explanation should be provided by CNN. The point is that your viewers should be allowed to have that information in order to make more informed decisions. I notice that almost always MSNBC does disclose the number of participants when they report the poll numbers. I believe CNN should be more honest with their viewers.
Most all the questions from the CNN panel, and from "journalists" at previous Republican debates as well, seemed to be designed to have one or more candidates pick a fight with or pile on other candidates. If during their answers to substantive questions such as those listed below, the debate participants want to pick a fight with one another, let them initiate it. Is that really your job as journalists to incite such behaviour? To their discredit, most of the candidates took the bait. There were hardly any questions like these, for example: What is your plan to deal with (name of issue)? How important is that (issue) to you, to the country? What resources should be brought to bear to fix or lessen this problem? How would you propose to pay for this? What experience do you have, or how do you propose, to bring together highly partisan and fractious parties to solve problems? Give us a list of the top 5 or 10 problems facing America. You did not list "XYZ" problem in your list. How big of a problem do you think that issue is? Where would you place it on a list of challenges America faces? Another exercise for the candidates could have been: "Here is a list of problems that are listed by various groups and prominent persons that face this country. During the upcoming commercial break, you will have 2-3 minutes to organize them in their order of importance to you. Then we will ask each of you how you would deal with your top 3 or 5 or whatever. I am confident that, if they try, journalists including you can come up with even more informative and elucidating questions than these to help the American people learn what they need to know about the candidates. Sincerely, Tom PS - I have included below a message sent to Hugh Hewitt about his ridiculous question to Ben Carson ----------------------------------------- To: [protected]@hughhewitt.com Subject: Your Republican Debate Question to Carson on 15 December Seriously?!?!?!? You asked a PEDIATRIC neurosurgeon whether he would have trouble bombing civilians INCLUDING children to protect America. Here's a man who has made clear his position on the general topic of national security AND has saved/improved the lives of many, many children and their families. As I believe this is how he really feels, I wish he had taken a few step towards you on the stage, and looking directly into your eyes, then said, "Sir, I have dedicated my life to saving children's lives so they would have a chance for a better future. As someone who has lived the American Dream myself, if you or anyone thinks I will not do everything necessary to keep Americans safe, especially our children who represent the future of the most exceptional country in history, you and they are sadly mistaken." Mr Hewitt, your question seemed to have come from a leftist mindset, designed for ratings, while attempting to make someone uncomfortable, but in fact it was as ill-conceived as it was fatuous. I hope you heard him later on Hannity where he explained the analytical technique he uses before making important decisions. Perhaps you can use your "considerable" influence to get the Democratic candidates to answer the same question. Hopefully your role in any future debates will be relegated back to the one you had at the MSNBC debate debacle - token Republican questioner. Disgusted and disappointed, Tom
Does the CNN have a problem reporting Global Warming as a critical issue? The three top Democratic candidates for President all included CLIMATE CONTROL as a major issue. They did not skirt the issue or insulate this issue in scientific jargon; Bernie Sanders, Hilary Clinton and Martin O'Malley consider it important for the American public to recognize this issue. That was clear during CNN's Democratic Debate (13Oct2015). Subsequently today, why does the CNN fail to report Democratic acknowledgement of this issue, in contrast to Republican candidates, of CLIMATE Change and Global Warming in CNN's sound bites today? While I respect Anderson Cooper's leadership during the Democratic Debate, the CNN 'talking heads' that followed failed to call attention to contrast between candidates' position on Climate. Best regards, Jewel A. Lee former contractor supporting NOAA's research on Climate Change and pending horrific outcomes
Wow the CNN Jewish Propaganda Machine is in full force tonight in their show "CNN Presents: Mystery of Jesu...
CNN early morning programming is now the worst in the the business. I'm speaking on Zoraida Sambolin's & Ashleigh Banfield's show. My complaint is really against Zoraida Sambolin more so than Ms. Banfield. Ms. Sambolin is way over her head! Her present & words are a new low. She is far from neutral in her comments; has little creditability in her opinions and needs to show some professionalism.
CNN had a reasonable early morning show in the recent past but for unknown reasons, they have replaced good hosts with poorer ones. (Sorry Ms. Banfield, but 'low tides sink all ships' and i fell badly that I'm painting you with the same brush).
CNN, please do better in the future.
Respected sir, i am chandan singh from india. I have recived sms on 11 / 09 / 2011 congrats my mobile no: -...
Sir my name is suman I got an sms that i had got some money & to get the amount mail to an id given. I had...
In the wake of the phone hacking scandal by News International, is it appropriate that Piers Morgan maintains such high profile with CNN, when it is increasingly evident that he not only was involved in phone hacking himself, but was willing to tell a barefaced lie in court about it?
CNN will seriously need to check what is going on with their brand, which has already given over much important news time to such tittle-tattle as Piers is famous for, if they continue to use such a dishonest individual to deliver their services.
Great admiration is still deserved by CNN for its efforts to end human trafficking as well as other global causes. This is not done justice if such individuals as Piers Morgan continue to represent the network.
sir i received a mail from cnn world news coorporation londan from gaming board. in this msg i won 700000 r...
My complaint is that cnn is always for one party and not for both parties ind wich other news stations are for both parties and i think that they should be pounninshed in a way as well the do not egknowledge of the fact that in when ever the new presidents says any thing on the economey there always blaming te one party and not the source of the problem in wich is the president all the time he is the leader saposed ofly and in wich he in my opion is noit leading what so ever so the should be find as well for to much pro o bama
CNN, BBC, Fox News, DW, etc spread lies. They say bad things about the Berlin Wall, but they are all lies.
The Berlin Wall was actually a good thing, as it was the first line of defense against NATO and against USA imperialism.
People who crossed the Berlin Wall were traitors to their country.
Redshield America News Network (RANN) is an idependent news source for the poeople. We’re dedicated to giving America a platform where the peoples voice can be heard. We value our readers and do everything in our (super) power to keep you happy. If you have any questions or concerns, please send us an email. For more News coverage, visit our friends over at CNN.com.
If you’re interested in joining our team of top-notch journalists, give us a call: [protected] office