AlterNet
Reviews and Complaints

Amanda Macrotte writes articles for AlterNet and if you look at the link below...

http://www.alternet.org/authors/amanda-marcotte... you'll feel the hate seeth from the page, and with that you'll understand the tone of the website.

Also check out this great set of comments:

http://www.alternet.org/comments/belief/why-are-so-many-christians-so-un-christian#disqus_thread

And notice the deleted ones. Those are mine. You may ask why would they be deleted? I don't know. They didn't give any warning or gave me any indication that I did anything wrong. If you happen to waste time reading the responses to what I posted you'll see how angry are and that their posts still are there despite their intolerance and hatred. Which is weird considering that's what the hit piece article was about.

A website that only wants those that agree with them to post is a website that fosters hatred for those that don't think like them and that... that's a problem. When you create a us vs them mentality even on a website you're the reason why there are groups of people who attack others for the way they think.

Each website has a right to dictate how they'll moderate their website. One would think the moderation rules would be for everyone not for a specific group while another group gets to do and say whatever they want.

This website reminds me of Current.com and we all know what happened to Current. It failed. This one is headed down the same road.

AlterNet is a website that is completely biased. They never publish real news. It's clear that the Democrat-liberals who run this site are in denial of what real news is all about.

AlterNet, man, let me tell you, it's like a maze of ads and stuff. They got these Java scripts all over the place, making it a real pain to get around. It's like they want you to subscribe or something, 'cause they're charging ten bucks a month for that privilege. And let me tell you, every page takes forever to load, if it even loads at all. It's a real bummer, dude.

An article written by Seth Norrholm recently caused quite a stir among Americans, with over 81,000,000 people feeling offended and labeled as "Deplorable." In this piece, Norrholm boldly claims that we all suffer from what he calls "CULT SYNDROME." Now, let me tell you, this arrogant individual has the audacity to pen such nonsense and attempt to back up his outrageous ideas with what he calls "psuedoscience" clap-trap!

I mean, seriously, who does this guy think he is? Writing such rubbish and expecting us to believe it? It's downright infuriating! Norrholm must be living in some kind of alternate reality, where he thinks he can just throw around derogatory terms and make sweeping generalizations about millions of people. Well, let me tell you, Mr. Norrholm, your ideas are nothing but BAT-$#*! CRAZY!

And let's not forget about his so-called "psuedoscience" evidence. I mean, come on! Who needs real science when you can just make up your own, right? It's like he's playing a game of Mad Libs with scientific terms, throwing them together without any regard for actual research or evidence. It's laughable!

Now, I don't claim to be an expert, but it's clear to me that Norrholm's article is nothing more than a desperate attempt to grab attention and stir up controversy. It's a shame that some people actually take this kind of garbage seriously. We deserve better than this kind of drivel passing off as journalism.

In conclusion, Seth Norrholm's article on AlterNet is a prime example of the kind of nonsense that passes for news these days. It's insulting, it's baseless, and it's just plain wrong. We should not let ourselves be swayed by such ridiculous claims and instead focus on seeking out reliable sources of information. Let's not fall victim to this kind of bat-$#*! crazy thinking!

When I first went on the AlterNet website, I noticed that my spyware alerted me about being tracked by six other sites. It was a bit concerning, to be honest. As I spent some time exploring the site, I couldn't help but feel that it had a rather negative vibe. It claims to strive for objectivity and rationality, but it often veers off into trashing and hating.

I was hoping to find some valuable insights and alternative viewpoints on various topics, but I must say, I was left disappointed. The content seemed to lack depth and substance, focusing more on sensationalism and stirring up emotions rather than presenting well-researched information. It's a shame because I believe that alternative perspectives can be incredibly valuable in fostering a more well-rounded understanding of the world.

Furthermore, the writing style on AlterNet was quite simplistic and lacked nuance. It felt like the articles were written for a younger audience, with basic punctuation and grammar errors scattered throughout. While I understand the desire to appeal to a wider readership, it would have been nice to see a more sophisticated approach to the content.

In terms of the layout and design of the website, it was fairly user-friendly. Navigating through different sections and articles was relatively easy, and the site had a clean and organized appearance. However, the constant bombardment of ads was a bit overwhelming and distracting. It felt like every click led to another pop-up or video ad, which made the overall browsing experience less enjoyable.

Overall, I wouldn't consider AlterNet as a reliable source for finding truths or alternative viewpoints. While it may have some interesting articles here and there, the overall tone and lack of depth make it difficult to take the content seriously. If you're looking for well-researched and balanced perspectives, I would suggest exploring other sources that prioritize accuracy and thoughtful analysis.