Staci Gunar review: Fraud - extortion - defamation

Is it becoming clear that SJ and "Tracy" just may have convoluted their vindictive MINDHEALINGMIRACLES.COM, PETER COPANI & BROCK MARDIS CC report-attacks in an elaborate attempt to portray Peter Copani as “delusional” for the purpose of covering up the crime of extortion and revenge in retaliation for Peter’s refusing to pay the demanded ransom for “a financial settlement”? There was a second phone call documented on November 18, 2008 requesting “$10, 000 cash”, and a third call documented November 21, 2008, “… $10, 000 and Tracy also wants a monthly check …sort-a like an alimony check!” A total of 51 minutes soliciting money documented.

SG has met Peter Copani on only one brief occasion in court on the morning of November 18th, 2008, when she, Staci Gunar, once again, stressed her and Tracy's greed for money and declaring ‘that they did not want to cause Brock any harm or see him go to jail over this. They just wanted him to get “help and….” SG and “Tracy” followed up with a 34 minute phone call that November 18th evening affirming their demand for money in exchange for Brock’s freedom, that is, “in exchange for dropping the charges against Brock.” “I responded by saying that in Florida, even if you drop the charges the state picks them up.” Ms. Gunar topped me by saying, "We know how to get around that…"

The actions conducted by SG and "Tracy" In my opinion it amounts to perjury, extortion and also several counts of attempted extortion, in violation of Florida Statute 836.05. I brought a full report with documentation to Sgt. Valenti at the Sheriff's office. When I explained that the first request for money in exchange for dropping the charges, was made a mere three hours after “Tracy” left the hospital and that I had the documentation from the telephone records that the call had come on Tracy's girlfriend Staci’s cell phone and that Staci being a person I had never met. … Sgt. Valenti's gut reaction was, “it sounds like a setup to me!” He took the documentation and went off into his office. There is also a lawsuit against SG which is pending. I sincerely hope that my allegations will be noticed and investigated without prejudice.

If justice prevails a retrial or exoneration for Brock Mardis would be appropriate. I would think that manipulation of the evidence and withholding evidence from the jury would be a crime, but then again, criminals know how to use consumer complaint websites and the judicial system to their own advantage.

If you were on a jury and was presented with evidence that just approximately 3 hours after a purported crime, the so-called victim and her roommate, makes a request for money in exchange for dropping the charges, would you suspect the charges to be fraudulent? Would you want these charges to be investigated?

SG’s character speaks for itself. Please read her other report numbers 774455 and 774459 as well as Sj Angur CC reports about her family, friends and employers. SG’s criminal record is also a matter of public record with a simple search on the computer. The following remark from a SG relative in response to one of Staci Gunar’s hateful complaints sums the Author, SG, up perfectly: “my aunt Staci who wrote this [‘Sj Angur’ complaint]… a low life drug addict who thrives for attention…”

Ponder this. If a known drug addict like Staci and a “Tracy” were to call you shortly after accusing anyone that you know of any serious crime, and demanded money from you in exchange for that person's freedom-held-hostage, what would you think, feel, and do? Would you do nothing? Or would you attempt to bring the truth to light and pray to a higher power?

Please Note: All of Staci Gunar comments in this CC reports about Brock's family life in Kentucky and what people did or didn't say along with her projections about the personal relationship and business arrangements between Peter Copani, MindHealingMiracles.com and Brock Mardis, is all speculation and hearsay. Staci Gunar was not present and did not witness the times and events she describes in her so-called ‘consumer’ complaints.