Curriculum Associates
reviews and complaints

As a middle school student, I have a lot of homework to complete on a daily basis. And while I relish the thought of being able to enjoy my weekends after finishing all my school work, completing the 60-minute iready sessions just ruins the entire weekend experience for me. I despise it with every fiber of my being. Some of the lessons are so overly complicated that I am forced to redo them multiple times before grasping the concepts. To add to my misery, there are close reading lessons that are exceedingly long and tedious.

Whenever I get a quiz answer incorrect, my self-worth takes a major hit, and I almost cry from the disappointment. When I first started Ireay in first grade, they had the small games that kept me engaged and interested in learning. However, the game has since been updated, and now it’s nothing but stupid jokes that are hardly entertaining. The diagnostic was also changed, and the fun alien shooter game was replaced with a mindless “brain break,” which is hardly relaxing.

Why do we have to complete the entire lesson again if we fail the quiz? Why not let us retake the quiz instead? It would be much more beneficial for our learning experience. I miss the days when Ireay was simpler and didn't have all these unnecessary changes that make it unbearable. It's quite obvious that the people behind Ireay care more about profits than the actual learning experience for students. Oh, and let's not forget about the ridiculous grading system- I got a 62% even though I only got two questions wrong!

Despite all of the negative experiences with Curriculum Associates and Ireay, I'm grateful that I could find a platform where I can voice my opinions and rate my experience with this terrible program. I also included a photo to show how awful the animation is- it's the least they could do if they're going to give us such a poor user experience.

As students who have been forced to take i-Ready for years, we are frustrated with the lack of attention being given to our hardships. Luckily, we recently stumbled upon Curriculum Associates and their website, curriculumassociates.com, which provides an alternative to the i-Ready system.

We were thrilled to hear that there are options available for schools to use instead of i-Ready, which has caused us nothing but stress and despair. The company claims that i-Ready is an adaptive diagnostic tool that pinpoints student needs down to the sub-skill level and provides ongoing progress monitoring. However, as students, we have found that the program is anything but helpful. The test is designed to take only 30 minutes but often goes on for hours, and the so-called "brain breaks" are a waste of time that could be spent on actual learning.

In addition to these issues, we have found that i-Ready often covers concepts that we already know, and in some cases, the content is not current or relevant to our grade level. It's clear that the people who assigned this program to us did not thoroughly consider its effectiveness before implementing it in our schools.

We appreciate that Curriculum Associates offers an alternative to i-Ready, which we believe would benefit students greatly. We urge educators to consider the negative impact that i-Ready is having on students and to give other programs a chance. It's time to listen to student voices and provide them with a better educational experience.

Curriculum Associates has been a subject of controversy lately. Some people have expressed their displeasure with the website and its learning platform, IReady. While it still exists, some believe that if it has a hundred negative reviews it will be sued. However, this may be wishful thinking as the website is still operational. One reviewer named Vivi P said the website is useful, but most people disagree with this opinion and think she is a bot sent to promote IReady. People who have attempted to use the platform have expressed feelings of boredom, frustration, and even torment. It is no secret that the platform is inclined toward rote learning and repetition, rather than any form of creativity or exploration. Going through the diagnostic exam alone is quite a tortuous process, as it involves answering questions that are designed to make the user feel like they are perpetually failing. The consensus is that IReady only aims to burn through your valuable time by making you revisit basic concepts that are not beneficial to your academic growth. While the website may have some entertaining games, this comes at a price, as you need coins to access these features, and you can only obtain coins by going through the tedious lessons. The general feeling is that IReady is not a website that should be recommended by teachers as they may not understand its shortcomings fully. Some even believe that the organization is exploiting users for their financial gain, which is quite damning. In conclusion, Curriculum Associates is a website that has faced much criticism lately. Its learning platform, IReady, is viewed mostly negatively by users who have found it to be monotonous, unstimulating and counterproductive. Hopefully, the issues surrounding the website can be addressed quickly to improve the situation for its users.

As a student who has had to use Curriculum Associates' program, i-Ready, for some time now, I must say that it has been a difficult and challenging experience. Although the program is designed to help me improve my academic performance, I find that it takes up too much of my time, leaving me with little time for other activities.

My teachers require me to complete 45-60 minutes of i-Ready lessons every day, which can be both tedious and overwhelming. The animations used in the program are poorly done and the characters are dull and uninteresting. Additionally, the coins earned for completing lessons do not have much value, as one can easily locate the games on other websites for free.

During the tests, the games only serve to slow me down, and the tools provided (like rulers and compasses) are irrelevant because no one uses them. Furthermore, I already have the knowledge to use these tools, so the continuous prompts and demonstrations are unnecessary.

i-Ready is affecting my grades and my performance in school. It discourages me from doing other activities because of the amount of time it requires. Its negative impact has even extended to my family, as my parents are not happy with my academic performance and are punishing me for not completing lessons.

I am mentally exhausted from this experience, and I find it challenging to deal with. i-Ready is ruining my life, and it's becoming more and more difficult to handle as time goes on. Consequently, I find myself dreading the program and wishing there was a way around it.

i-Ready is not helpful to me as a student; it only serves to waste time, ruin grades and reduce my morale. I would not recommend this program to anyone, and I wish my school would consider other, more effective learning tools.

I recently came across the website of Curriculum Associates, and my experience with their product i-Ready has been less than satisfactory. Firstly, the system seems to have a glitch where it shows less time spent on the platform than actually done, leading me to question the legitimacy of their reports. Secondly, some positive reviews of i-Ready seem fake as they try to discredit other learning platforms. The explanations provided on the platform also seem insufficient.

Furthermore, there are more concerning issues with the platform. It appears that the company tries to manipulate users into using their product and appears to bully schools into adding their app. It seems like a money-grabbing scheme that takes away valuable resources from schools without any real educational benefit. Upon research, it appears that there are countless negative reviews of the platform, and it could potentially cause harm to mental health.

Additionally, the system seems to drain student's energy and is a waste of time, money and resources. The company appears to be more concerned about promoting their animations and doing self-promotion than providing quality education. It is disappointing how the company ignores negative feedback from users and tries to silence critical reviews.

In conclusion, I would not recommend the i-Ready platform from Curriculum Associates. It seems like a problematic and questionable program that has received numerous complaints over the years. In my opinion, other educational platforms are more efficient and offer better educational value.

Curriculum Associates is a website that offers educational materials for students. While some individuals may have had negative experiences with the site, it is important to note that everyone's experience may vary. It is also crucial to maintain a level of professionalism and respect in any critique or review.

That being said, some reviewers have expressed frustration with the site's interactive lessons. Some may feel that they are too long, or that the characters are distracting rather than helpful. Additionally, the site's diagnostic process may start at a low level, which some students may find frustrating.

While it is understandable that some individuals may feel frustrated with educational materials, it is important to keep in mind that these resources are intended to help students learn and succeed. It may be helpful to communicate any concerns directly to the Curriculum Associates team, as they may be able to provide support or offer suggestions to improve the experience. Overall, it is important to approach critiques and reviews in a constructive and respectful manner.

The online education platform, Curriculum Associates, has several areas that require improvement. The storylines implemented by the platform are lengthy and leave students bored and unproductive. While the objective is to engage students in learning, the extensive dialogue does not contribute to understanding the subject matter.

Furthermore, the quizzes do not effectively communicate to students where they went wrong. The software encourages repetition of the lesson until students succeed, but if the original lesson was not effective, is repeating it the solution? It would be beneficial for Curriculum Associates to provide alternate and more thorough lessons for students who need additional assistance.

These issues make the website frustrating to use and should not be mandatory in a classroom setting. It is disheartening to note that these issues remain unaddressed, and the company should take steps to refine their platform. Failure to address user feedback would deter potential customers, and it is advised that they take constructive reviews seriously.

In conclusion, Curriculum Associates must address these challenges to provide a better learning experience for their users. Shortening storylines, improving quiz feedback, and offering more effective lessons would make the platform more engaging and productive. It is recommended that the company listen to constructive criticism and make the necessary changes to the platform to enhance student learning.

Hello, as a reviewer, I'd like to share my thoughts on the online educational platform Curriculum Associates, specifically, Iready. I believe that it is not the best option for young learners.

Firstly, let's discuss the diagnostic aspect of Iready. In my experience, I had to go through it multiple times and found it frustrating as it often contained questions that I had already answered before. Even if you're doing it for the first time that year, you'll still have to do half of the lesson with the same questions from the previous year, which can be very boring. Additionally, there are cutscenes and "brain breaks" that add to the time spent on the diagnostic, making it a lengthy process, and sometimes it doesn't count towards the total time spent on Iready.

Furthermore, I feel that it's unfair to the students who have to complete one lesson every day. The platform has a feature where the screen asks if you're still present, which can be frustrating and demotivating for young kids trying to learn. I can only imagine how difficult it must be for students to stay engaged with a platform that continuously interrupts their learning process.

Lastly, I want to address the negative sentiment I experienced and found on multiple petitions to get rid of Iready. I believe that there is a real need to voice the issues students have with such platforms, which could potentially help in improving the learning experience for everyone.

In summary, Iready is not the best online educational platform for young learners. There are several areas that need improvement, and the fact that some students want to get rid of it speaks volumes. If you're considering using Curriculum Associates for your child, be aware of its shortcomings and consider other options that offer a more engaging and supportive learning experience.

Curriculum Associates, particularly their I-Ready program, seems to have garnered a polarizing reputation among the student body. There are those who are frustrated by the program's seemingly tedious and time-consuming nature. Conversely, some tout its effectiveness in helping hone students' academic skills.

Some students have expressed concerns that their teachers may become upset if they fail to complete an I-Ready lesson. There are also complaints that the program takes too long to complete, which is causing students to lose focus and become frustrated. According to these individuals, it seems that I-Ready is not as effective as it is intended to be. Rather, it has become a source of frustration and boredom for the students.

In some instances, the students have expressed worry that if they're unable to answer I-Ready questions correctly, they may appear "dumb" in front of their peers or teachers. This anxiety only serves to compound the stress and frustration students feel when using the program.

On the other side of the spectrum, there are students who attest that I-Ready has helped them with their academics, allowing them to become more skilled in the areas where they struggle. They appreciate the extra help that I-Ready provides.

Moreover, I-Ready has a particular allure for teachers as it offers a way to support student growth and progress in their individual academic areas. Even still, it's important to recognize the student feedback regarding the program, as student's input should be taken into account when creating a learning environment that is effective for all students.

It's clear to see that Curriculum Associates and their I-Ready program has a mixed reception. While some appreciate the support it offers in struggling areas, others criticize it for being overly tedious, confusing, and detrimental to learning. It ultimately falls upon Curriculum Associates to consider the feedback from both sides and create a program that works for all parties involved.

Upon visiting the website of Curriculum Associates, I am compelled to share my personal experience with their I-Ready program. As a student who has been required to use this program for a minimum of 30 minutes every week, I have found it to be lacking in many aspects. While some may enjoy the character designs and the mini-game involving stacking cats, I find the program's audio to be unbearable. The quality of the audio is similar to that of a cheap baby toy that plays music and it is so unpleasant that I often have to resort to plugging my earbuds in and out repeatedly. Furthermore, the animations within the program are not visually appealing, and I find them to be quite cringeworthy.

In contrast, I have found ST Math to be a more enjoyable learning experience. Although, it is not without its flaws as well. However, among the flaws that exist with I-Ready, one of the most significant issues that my parents and I have encountered is that it can be rather confusing to navigate. I have shown my parents the poor audio quality within the program, and they were dismayed to realize that I was required to use it every week.

Another issue I have with I-Ready is the inclusion of the detective penguin character. I find his catchphrase to be quite grating and it haunts my dreams. Furthermore, one level within the program includes a baking competition where there is an image of a plate on which granola bars should be drawn. However, someone failed to draw a granola bar and instead simply copied and pasted an image onto the plate within the program.

In conclusion, while Curriculum Associates may have its positive aspects, such as the character designs, I have found the I-Ready program to be subpar in many ways. The audio quality, animations, and confusing interface make it a difficult program to use, and I wish that other programs, such as ST Math, were more widely implemented.

Upon visiting the website of Curriculum Associates, I was dismayed to discover that their I-Ready program is a subpar choice for education. The website itself leaves much to be desired, and during lessons, I-Ready is prone to freezing, causing the user to need to close the tab and restart the program. This can be quite frustrating and a waste of valuable time.

Moreover, the supposed "stories" that Curriculum Associates has integrated into the lessons are a huge letdown. These poorly animated cartoons add no real value to the learning process and instead cause the user to become bored and disengaged due to their choppy nature. These animations take up a considerable amount of time, and the user is forced to sit through them for around 30 seconds before the program inevitably freezes once again.

While the actual learning aspect of the program is decent, the quality of the website cannot be overlooked. Users are forced to struggle through the constant freezing and poor quality of the animations, which can be a major hindrance to the learning process. As such, I strongly encourage potential users to avoid this website and consider other programs such as TenMarks, which are known for their high-quality educational resources.

In conclusion, Curriculum Associates' I-Ready program is simply not worth the effort due to its unreliable website and poorly executed animations. Users will inevitably face frustration due to the constant freezing and subpar content, which ultimately detracts from the learning experience. It is regrettably apparent that this website is in desperate need of improvement before it can be considered a viable option for education.

As someone who has used Curriculum Associates and their online program, IReady, for a few years now, I feel the need to share my honest opinion on the matter. While many people have commented that the program is cheap and they hate it, I want to provide more insight into why that is the case.

Firstly, IReady takes an excessive amount of time to complete. Even if you only make a couple of mistakes, you may be forced to start over again. Additionally, when you make a mistake, the program simply says "oops, try again" without providing any explanation as to why you got it wrong in the first place. This makes it difficult for students to learn from their mistakes and improve their understanding of the material.

Furthermore, despite the program encouraging you not to rush through diagnostic tests, it only provides a week to complete them. This is a difficult feat when a single test contains 100 questions, each requiring you to read an entire passage.

On top of these issues, many find the characters names and jokes used in IReady to be childish and silly. For example, one of the characters is named "Pepper Jackie" and the jokes offered can hardly be considered humorous.

Finally, the program looks and sounds unappealing and unprofessional. Many teachers and students find it difficult to engage with such a subpar platform.

In summary, IReady is poorly designed and executed, and I do not recommend it. In fact, I encourage others to join the petition to end IReady found here: https://www.change.org/su/p/iready-must-end/f.

The experience that I had with Curriculum Associates' i-ready program was less than desirable. As an 8th grade student last year, I remember having to complete i-ready for both math and ELA, and it was quite frustrating. The lessons are incredibly time-consuming, with some taking as long as five hours to complete. Additionally, the ratings are poor, and the animations can be annoying. It's hard to stay motivated when you feel like you're doing something that is designed for a much younger audience.

One of the major issues with i-ready is that if you get one question wrong, it can lead to a lengthy and unnecessary lecture for about 10 minutes. It can be incredibly frustrating when you feel like you're being talked down to. It's disappointing considering that we were all excited to use it initially. However, many of us quickly changed our opinions. I've heard this sentiment echoed by many students in my school - everyone talks about how bad it is.

One particular instance that stands out happened when I was assigned an i-ready lesson that had four parts. Unfortunately, I failed the test, and then I had to start all over again from the beginning. Not only that, the diagnostic process is glitchy and cumbersome, making the experience feel like a punishment. If you need to pause the lesson to attend to something else, the program interrupts your break with a message that asks if you're still there. If you don't respond, it logs you out, which is a frustrating experience.

One of the most challenging aspects of i-ready is the animation and character. The blinking only once in a sentence is enough to drive you insane. When you get a question right, the program lectures you for half an hour about their perceived greatness, which is excessive and annoying. To say the least, the entire process can drive anyone nuts.

Overall, it's hard to recommend i-ready to anyone. It's an incredibly aggravating and unproductive program that makes it hard to feel motivated to learn. I wouldn't advise anyone to use this program, as it seems to make people feel worse about learning, rather than encouraged. When it comes to education, it's important that we find a program that fosters a love of learning, and unfortunately, i-ready is the opposite of that. I hope Curriculum Associates will consider these issues and work to improve the program comprehensively for future users.