www.zazzle.com/geekgirlunlimited β€” ssi fraud & your tax dollars

M
This review was posted by
a verified customer
Verified customer
Review updated:

geekgirlunlimited sells graphic designs at zazzle and pockets the income while your tax dollars pay for her to sit home all day on the computer. She collects SSI and is a self admitted mentally ill woman on numerous anti-depressant medications and various other drugs. She has stated online she takes a multitude of medications and often doesn't even get out of her nightgown.

While some of the designs are colorful, you may NOT generate an outside income while collecting SSI.

After recently finding out through a web site her SSI was being questioned and SSI was being alerted, she immediately added the phrase "All proceeds go to JRAS" to both her web site geekgirlunlimited and her page at zazzle.com.
A rep at JRAS has never received any donations from geekgirlunlimited.

She has several alias names. Shanda Hill, Shanda Ross, Shanda Reynolds, Shanda Maddox, Shanda Lancaster, Shanda Jofiel, Shanda Noneya.

SSI has been notified and Shanda Maddox/Lancaster/Hill/Ross/Reynolds is currently under investigation.

ssi fraud & your tax dollars

Responses

  • Tr
    trishi holder Feb 10, 2021
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    I found your website because now this lady Diane patchen that was on this lawsuit has been collecting money for years on youtube for st Jude’s but refuses to show receipts she donated the money to them. She has gone dark and won’t get on her once popular show in the so cloaked drama community. She made a mistake by trying yo get members of crime community to come subscribe and now people are questioning her, I don’t know if she is a scammer or not. But people are very suspicious since she has been belligerent and threatening if you ask any questions.

    18 Votes
  • De
    Derrrrr Jan 30, 2012
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    You are not too intelligent are you? Thanks for bumping this, blackwidow. I think you should heed your own advice about opening your mouth.

    0 Votes
  • Re
    Recordkeeper Jan 30, 2012
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Hahahahahaha! With that infamous 60-page post on PC, all she proved is that the dangerous person is her! Oh, and earned herself another lawsuit as well! Some people never learn that keeping your mouth shut is often the best option.

    -4 Votes
  • Sh
    Shanda Lancaster Jan 27, 2012
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    http://manthissitesucks.pissedconsumer.com/manthissitesucks-members-are-dangerous-20111209280283.html

    0 Votes
  • Sh
    Shanda Lancaster Sep 28, 2011
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Libel.

    1 Votes
  • V3
    V3456d Sep 02, 2011

    Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
    View as Table
    Cases 1 - 20 of 135Subscribe
    PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al
    Filed: August 25, 2011 as 2:2011cv05388
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK
    Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others
    Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
    Court: Third Circuit > Pennsylvania > Eastern District Court
    Type: Torts - Injury > Assault Libel & Slander

    -1 Votes
  • Ba
    Banned Member Aug 31, 2011
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    Naw, she can't google anyone at this moment cause she is running through the hills of Tennessee!

    0 Votes
  • Ow
    Oweon Apr 04, 2020
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Banned Member Can someone please explain what’s the go with Diane Patchen & husband Robert Smik what’s their story to all this mess please πŸ˜€

    0 Votes
  • La
    Lazy Dazy Feb 18, 2021

    @Oweon A lot of us are wondering the same thing! Looks like you were ahead of the game πŸ‘πŸ»

    3 Votes
  • Mi
    Micki 121 Feb 19, 2021
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    @Oweon Diane"s Channel on yt.

    1 Votes
  • Ho
    howunfortunate4u Aug 31, 2011

    lady, ur busted. google urself lately?????


    Search Results

    Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern ...
    dockets.justia.com › ... › Torts - Injury - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court :: Justia ...
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings › Third Circuit › Pennsylvania - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Pennsylvania :: Justia ...
    dockets.justia.com › ... › Third Circuit › Pennsylvania › Torts - Injury - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "John Does 1-19" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    1 day ago – Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "JOHN DOES (1-20)" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "J. H." :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "John 2 Doe" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "JOHN DOE" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    4 days ago – Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    Cases filed matching "FRANCIS" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
    dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
    Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
    PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al
    www.law360.com/cases/4e57bd15df270801ea000002 - Cached
    5 days ago – PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al. You will be tracking all: ... Defendant. SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX ... Plaintiff. DIANE PATCHEN ...

    0 Votes
  • C3
    C3ph45 Jun 18, 2011
    This comment was posted by
    a verified customer
    Verified customer

    The information posted above is nothing more than libel comments posted by disgruntled individuals, who have an issue with Mrs. Lancaster on a personal level.

    I can verify that Mrs. Lancaster does give money to charity because she sent me the receipt of the exact dollar amount I had paid to her, from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and was kind enough to even put it in my name.

    On a more personal level, which is obvious when they attack her disability. Mrs. Lancaster doesn't even receive money from SSI. She is also in no way under investigation harassment and libel and will not be facing charges.

    Another obvious point that this is personal, is the fact she is using the last name of her husband, but hasn't legally changed it. You don't have to legally change the name, you can assume the last name of your spouse without legally changing it.

    Also why post skewed and personal information about the individual. There is no need to include the exact address of this individual, not to mention state she is not married. She has a loving husband, and beautiful children. I don't if shes considered married in the courts eyes, but she would be consider common law.


    This report is nothing more than an attack towards an individual by others whom she provided a witness statement against. She is not being investigated, or being charged with harassment, and is in no way a liar.

    -1 Votes

Post your comment

    By clicking Submit you are agreeing to the Complaints Board’s Terms and Conditions

    IN THE NEWS

    Unhappy consumers gather online at Complaintsboard.com and have already logged thousands of complaints.
    If you see dozens of complaints about a certain company on ComplaintsBoard, walk away.
    One of the largest consumer sites online. Posting here your concerns means good exposure for your issues.
    A consumer site aimed at exposing unethical companies and business practices.
    ComplaintsBoard is a good source for product and company gripes from especially dissatisfied people.
    You'll definitely get some directions on how customer service can best solve your problem.
    Do a little research on the seller. Visit consumer complaint websites like ComplaintsBoard.