ScreenRant
Reviews and Complaints

Not much serious reporting going on here, they appear ***@FilmClickbate on a regular basis which says a lot. There youtube stuff can be okay at times, but mostly just filler.

Screen rant is a fun place for people to learn about cool easter eggs, however SPOILER ALERT! Watch the movie first. Even better watch ALL the movies, easter eggs may be fun cool connections about movies but they have another name, spoilers!

Unlike many other sites, they keep their content updated. Loved reading their in-depth news stories... Keep up the good work! Cheers!

Screen Rant is always up to date with their reality tv news and provides an interesting angle on topics. I'll always use their website for entertainment news!

The best thing about Screen Rant is the diversity of opinions that the site has on a regular basis, which means that you get a lot of different POVs on the site. They also cover several shows/comics/movies that don't get any attention from other websites. I feel like every site can be criticized for valid things, but I see many people hating on Screen Rant (and on similar sites) because they read this or that opinion that they really hate. However, if you actually look on the site, there's usually another article written from someone else who feels differently and provides other POVs. As a fan, I love seeing my favorite things being talked about, and I love having my assumptions challenged by diverse opinions. I really like the site and it's a shame that it gets trashed on by fans who want to live inside an echo chamber.

I'm want Ash Ketchum and his Pikachu and Misty and Brock and Jessie and James and a talking Meowth to be on 2025 Pokémon Horizons cartoon and I'm want someone to talk for Ash Ketchum and Misty and Brock and Jessie and James and Meowth on 2025 Pokémon Horizons cartoon because I'm a big fan of Ash Ketchum and his Pikachu and Misty and Brock and Jessie and James and a talking Meowth and I'm hope it stay that way and I'm hope they on every episode on 2025 Pokémon Horizons cartoon and I'm want them to be on every new Pokémon cartoon because I'm miss them a lot and I'm want Ash Ketchum and his Pikachu and Misty and Brock to join their journey together as friends on every new Pokémon cartoon and the Team Rockets is Jessie and James and the Pokémon is Meowth they are enemies on the Pokémon cartoon.

Screen Rant is a website that I have to visit frequently for my film class. I have noticed that they often make some bold statements that are meant to demonize or distance a particular group in favor of a political or social movement. Recently, they did this with the newest Pokemon games, where they tried to make it seem like the games were not accepting enough of the LGBTQ+ community. However, they also had an article praising the same games for their LGBTQ+ representation. This kind of contradiction is confusing and frustrating for readers like me.

I believe that Screen Rant should focus on providing unbiased and informative content about games, movies, and other forms of entertainment. Instead, they seem to be more interested in turning everything into a political or social movement. This approach is divisive and unnecessary. As readers, we just want to enjoy and learn about the entertainment we love without any political or social agenda being forced upon us.

It is important for websites like Screen Rant to understand that their readers come from all walks of life and have different beliefs and opinions. By intentionally demonizing or distancing a particular group, they risk alienating a large portion of their audience. This is not a good business strategy and can lead to a decline in readership.

In conclusion, while Screen Rant does provide some interesting content, their tendency to turn everything into a political or social movement is frustrating and unnecessary. I hope that they will focus more on providing unbiased and informative content in the future.

ScreenRant is a website that has been around for quite some time now. They cover a variety of topics, including movies, TV shows, and video games. Recently, they wrote an article about how Carol Danvers needs to "take a lesson" from the men in the MCU. This article has caused quite a stir among fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Now, I'm not saying that the person who wrote the article hates women, but it does seem like they were trying to stir up some drama. It's sad to see that a website with millions of followers would resort to such tactics just to get some attention. It's almost like they're trying to create controversy out of a controversial topic (Captain Marvel/Brie Larson).

I think ScreenRant needs to take a hint and realize that they don't need to create drama to get people to read their articles. They have a large following already, and they should focus on creating quality content instead of trying to stir up controversy. If they continue down this path, they may end up losing some of their followers.

In conclusion, ScreenRant needs to step up their game and focus on creating quality content. They don't need to create drama to get people to read their articles. Fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe deserve better than that.

ScreenRant is a company that I recently had the displeasure of working for. I must say, their work culture is just plain awful. The managers and editors completely ignore the staff of writers. It's like they don't even exist. I don't see how anyone can run a business the way they do. Seriously, do you know what happens when you ignore people? They go away and find work somewhere else.

To make matters worse, they pay out one of the lowest rates in the industry. It's insulting, really. The editors do nothing but cause problems. When you do manage to get one to reply to you, they are always nothing but nasty, rude, and manipulative. It's like they enjoy making their writers feel small and insignificant.

If you are thinking about working for this company, I urge you to reconsider. Start looking for other work the moment they onboard you so you can get the heck out of there. The work environment and culture is like having to swim around in a vat of toxicity. It's not worth the stress and frustration.

Overall, I would not recommend ScreenRant to anyone. Their work culture is toxic, their pay is insulting, and their editors are downright nasty. Save yourself the trouble and look elsewhere for employment.

ScreenRant is a website that provides a variety of articles on movies, TV shows, and video games. However, as a former freelance writer for the website, I can say that they do not pay their writers. They dangle the promise of payment in front of you, but they never communicate how they will pay you. Even during the training course, writers were left in the dark about how they would receive their payment. When writers tried to reach out to management about their pay, they were fired.

The workload for writers is overwhelming. They are expected to do the work of a publisher, editor, and writer, which leads to low-quality articles. The so-called "editors" do not edit the articles, leaving all the work up to the writers.

It's important to remember that the articles on ScreenRant are written by writers who were scammed into doing it for free. The website takes advantage of their writers and does not communicate clearly about payment. As a result, the quality of the articles suffers.

ScreenRant is a website that is all about the world of comics and movies. It is a place where fans of Marvel and DC can come together to read about the latest news and gossip. The site is known for its negative reviews of DC comics, which generate a lot of clicks from Marvel fans and random readers. However, Marvel fans are the only ones who seem to be interested in the negative reviews of their favorite comics. DC fans, on the other hand, are not interested in reading about the negative aspects of their favorite comics.

The site is all about generating clicks and making money. The writers know that negative reviews of DC comics will generate more clicks than positive reviews. Therefore, they focus on the negative aspects of DC comics and movies. They do this to guarantee their internet cash. The site is a fanboy Marvel site that proliferates any fake news and speculation only for the clickbait sake. The writers know that if they can generate enough negative buzz for no Marvel Studios productions, they will stay relevant and get more clicks.

The site is not interested in peace and complete satisfaction for all the productions that come with us. They are only interested in generating clicks and making money. If no conflicts come around, they will create conflicts just for the sake of generating clicks. The site is all about staying relevant and making money. If you are a fan of Marvel comics, then this site is for you. However, if you are a fan of DC comics, then you might want to look elsewhere for your news and gossip.

ScreenRant is a website that covers movies and TV shows, but I gotta say, it's not always the best experience. Sometimes, I feel like the writers don't even watch the content they're writing about. It's like they just skim through it and then write an article based on what they think happened.

One thing that really bothers me is when they write articles like "10 Things About______ That Just Don't Make Sense." I mean, come on, it's not that hard to find ten things that don't make sense in anything. But the points they make are often such a stretch that it's hard to take them seriously. I mean, I'm all for analyzing movies and TV shows, but sometimes it feels like they're just trying to find something to complain about.

I remember when ScreenRant used to be really good quality. The articles were well-written and insightful. But now, it feels like they're just churning out content for the sake of it. It's like they're more concerned with quantity than quality.

Honestly, it's kind of frustrating. I want to read articles that are well-researched and thought-provoking. But instead, I get articles that are full of errors and inconsistencies. It's like they don't even proofread their work before publishing it.

All that being said, I still visit ScreenRant from time to time. There are still some good articles on there, and I do appreciate the effort that goes into creating content. But I just wish they would put more effort into making sure their articles are accurate and well-written.

I gotta say, ScreenRant is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, they've got some pretty interesting articles about movies and TV shows that I'm into. But on the other hand, every time I click on one of those articles, I feel like I'm waiting for an eternity for it to load. I mean, come on, ScreenRant, do you really need that many ads on your site? It's like they're trying to make me lose my mind before I even get to the actual content.

And when I do finally get to the content, it's not always what I was hoping for. I've read some articles that were clearly written by someone who hasn't even watched the thing they're writing about. They'll make these big claims about plot holes or character motivations that are just plain wrong. It's like they're trying to stir up controversy for clicks, instead of actually engaging with the material in a thoughtful way.

And don't even get me started on the fan theories. Look, I love a good fan theory as much as the next person, but ScreenRant takes it to a whole new level. They'll treat these wild, out-there theories as if they're actual canon, and it's just... frustrating. I want to read about the actual story, not someone's fanfiction.

All that being said, I do still find myself coming back to ScreenRant from time to time. They've got a lot of content, and sometimes they do manage to hit the mark with their analysis. But overall, I wish they would focus more on accuracy and less on clickbait.

Screenrant.com is a website that has some good content, but overall, I find myself very frustrated with it. Some articles have spoiled the fate of certain characters without any warning, which is very unprofessional and certainly annoying. It's like they don't care about the readers who haven't seen the movie or TV show yet.

On a more personal note, I was just looking at a list for the best Power Rangers, and I was disappointed to see that my favorite Ranger and childhood hero, Rocky, was constantly belittled by whoever was making the list. Rocky was the very first Hispanic Power Ranger and the second Red Ranger. He was charismatic, funny, humble, a great friend, and a very talented martial artist. He was an excellent role model for children, and he definitely deserves more respect than what they have given him.

I wish I could give my complaints on their website, but there's no comments section, so this will have to do. I hope they take this feedback seriously and improve their content. It's important to respect the characters and the fans who love them.

Whenever I finish watching a movie, TV show, or playing a video game, I always have an opinion on it. That's why I like to read or listen to other people's opinions on the same material. It helps me understand it better and sometimes even appreciate it more. That's why I sometimes click on screenrant articles when they get recommended to me. However, every time I do, I'm left feeling disappointed.

It's abundantly clear that the writers at screenrant haven't even watched the show or played the game they're writing about. If they're praising something, it's extremely lukewarm, and if they're criticizing something, it's based on a Wikipedia summary. It's frustrating to read articles that don't have any substance or depth to them. As far as I can tell, this isn't the writers' fault. They're given unreasonable deadlines, and it's the company's job to vet their writers anyway.

If you're someone whose mood can be affected by infuriating articles, I suggest you do yourself a favor and block this site. There are so many better options out there if you're looking for a place with "fun" reviews. Don't waste your time on screenrant.

In conclusion, screenrant is not a reliable source for reviews. The articles lack substance and depth, and it's clear that the writers haven't even watched the material they're writing about. If you're looking for a place to read reviews, there are much better options out there.

I read some reviews about ScreenRant and I have to say, I agree with the negative comments. However, I wanted to share my personal experience with the website. I applied to work there as a guide writer, hoping to make some extra money doing what I love - writing about movies and TV shows.

The application process was grueling. It took me six hours to complete, and I had to answer a lot of questions about my writing experience and provide writing samples. But the worst part was the section where they asked me to pitch story ideas for the website. It felt like they were just farming ideas from applicants, without any intention of actually hiring them.

And when I finally got a response, it was a quick rejection with no feedback. I was disappointed, but not surprised. What really bothered me was the pay rate - $21 for a feature article. That's almost non-existent, considering the amount of time and effort it takes to write a quality piece.

After looking more closely at the website, I realized that ScreenRant is all about clickbait. They want writers who will churn out articles that will generate clicks and ad revenue, not writers who are passionate about their craft. It's a shame, really, because there are so many talented writers out there who could contribute so much more to the website.

In conclusion, I would advise anyone considering working for ScreenRant to steer clear. The hiring practices are shady, the pay is insulting, and the content is mediocre at best. There are better opportunities out there for writers who want to make a living doing what they love.