Menu
CB Bullying and Harassment at Work Review of Roque Christensen LCSW, Lee Ann Hubanks, Michele Savoie-Shevlin, and Chris Chambers
Roque Christensen LCSW, Lee Ann Hubanks, Michele Savoie-Shevlin, and Chris Chambers

Roque Christensen LCSW, Lee Ann Hubanks, Michele Savoie-Shevlin, and Chris Chambers review: conspiracy against rights and workplace harassment at plano community homes 1

A
Author of the review
5:54 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more
Review updated:
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

This watchdog journalism involves the enjoyment and free exercise of the first amendment freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, and fair comment privilege as it pertains to the truth, fair criticism, and matters of public concern related to community well being, government, and safety.

The intent of this truthful complaint against: Roque Nix Christensen 22848 Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) Current, Active is to stop bigotry, entrapment, and harassment in the workplace and to promote equal opportunity, caring leadership, and increased civility in workplaces for minorities. I'm a protected class minority and I worked at Plano Community Homes (Plano Community Home East, West, and Pioneer Place locations) - Senior Citizen Housing in Plano, Texas. The employers Roque Christensen LCSW, Lee Ann Hubanks, and Michele Savoie-Shevlin intentionally sexually harassed me and incited a hostile work environment and mobbing against me. They claimed that I was on a federal watchlist and were instructed to interrogate me based off shocking disinformation they received from a defamatory smear campaign and then to report my distressed responses to a federal agent without a chance for me to have my attorney present. Roque Christensen LCSW also hypocritically claimed to be doing an investigation on my sex life in order to help me. In the process she made a mockery of the sexual assault and stalking I experienced many years ago from another tribulation and she continued to sexually harass me in her office along with Human Resources Director Michele Savoie-Shevlin. Right to privacy is set by Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505 (1961), and United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972).

I am innocent and I was not arrested yet the collection of emotionally distressed testimony was illegally obtained and violated my rights and ruined my reputation. I was wrongfully treated like a terrorist and a fugitive. Landmark precedent is set by these supreme court cases: Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960). Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1940). I am innocent and a very dignified worker yet they aggressively profiled me, abusively played good cop bad cop, invaded my privacy, harassed me, asked sexually offensive questions about my sex life and crotch, repeatedly asked if I wanted to harm former corrupt federal witnesses to an old bogus investigation, and then reported my distressed responses to the federal government. Under false pretense and pretext Roque Christensen LCSW hypocritically claimed to be helping me in the process. See Nader v. General Motors Corp. (25 N.Y. 2d 560, 1970) which set precedent against corporate stalking. Elhady v. Kable (2019) which set precedent against an unconstitutional terrorist watchlist and database.

In my honest opinion they tried to frame me by provoking me with aggressive verbal harassment, asked me multiple times if I wanted to harm corrupt witnesses who had made prior false accusations many years ago which had nothing to do with Plano Community Homes or paranoid witnesses who had wrongfully invaded my privacy against me, and Roque Christensen LCSW wrongfully reported my distressed responses onto an online federal watchlist dossier. The unethical federal witnesses had nothing to do with residents at Plano Community Homes yet Roque Christensen LCSW, Lee Ann Hubanks, Michele Savoie-Shevlin, and Chris Chambers framed and conspired against my rights anyways.

This is a matter of public concern as addressed in the supreme court case New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 1971. Furthermore, the corrupt leadership spread defamation by wrongfully informing others at Plano Community Home about my private life and sex life all of which incited alarmism, harassment, and discrimination. The corrupt leadership had belligerent or paranoid residents and co-workers harass and profile me while I was trying to do my job. The mobbing they incited interfered with my ability to do work. Roque Christensen LCSW spread defamatory disinformation about me to other co-workers and to residents causing me mental anguish and causing a chain reaction of discrimination. A belligerent co-worker named Chris Chambers had offensive outbursts of paranoid rage around me and regularly harassed me as well. I felt very unsafe working at Plano Community Home because of Roque Christensen LCSW and Chris Chambers. I believe those bigots wanted to harm me. All of the aforementioned bigots wrongfully put words in my mouth and used degrading insinuations and mischaracterizations about me to get me blacklisted in other areas of the workforce industry and community. Roque Christensen LCSW wrongfully insinuated and reported that I was a threat or a danger to others and to other establishments in the community to get me blacklisted.

In my honest opinion they incited discrimination, constructive discharge, civil conspiracy, defamation, and workplace violence against me. Regarding a matter of public concern several years ago when I was a teen at Frisco High School I was a victim of a malicious frame-up, a smear campaign, legal abuse, false accusations, and unrelenting bullying which led to a malicious federal investigation by the ATF which almost resulted in my false arrest and wrongful conviction. The original bogus complaints were made by C. Fieszel and B. Twist and other corrupt witnesses have since held a grudge and continued the smear campaign under the direction of a psychopathic federal agent. I was never arrested nor convicted yet my reputation was completely damaged by an ongoing smear campaign incited by psychopathic federal authority figures and by bigots and perverts in the community. Perverts in the community documented vulgar misrepresentations about my sex life and crotch. Roque Christensen LCSW made a ferocious mockery out of me and continued to humiliate me while I was trying to do my job. Roque Christensen LCSW continued to spread the shocking, vulgar, and defamatory disinformation to others at Plano Community Home which caused me mental anguish and caused a chain reaction of hysteria and fear-mongering. None of the flagrant disinformation from the original smear campaign should be held against me nor is it relevant since I was the victim of conspiracy, discrimination, and corruption yet I was the one who was treated like a dangerous criminal while working at Plano Community Home. Due to the harassment and sexual harassment I was unable to continue working under Roque Christensen's supervision. Roque Christensen caused me financial injury and damage to my reputation because of the aforementioned abuse of process.

At Plano Community Homes - East Campus hypocritical bigoted leaders named Michele Savoie-Shevlin and Roque Christensen bullied me about the aforementioned, sexually harassed me with vulgar mischaracterizations about my body and they interrogated me about my crotch and sexuality to humiliate and offend me. They spread malicious sexual defamation about me to other bigots which lowered me in the estimation of the community and made me vulnerable to scorn, ridicule, and contempt. They escalated the bigoted harassment and offensive interrogation when I challenged their corruption and pled the 4th, 5th, and 8th amendments and tried to avoid answering their shockingly offensive and asinine questions. The Eighth Amendment (Amendment VIII) of the United States Constitution prohibits the federal, state, and local governments of the United States, or any other government, or any corporation, private enterprise, group, or individual, from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments, in any part of the US, on US property (i.e. a US embassy), or against any US citizen, or any resident of the US.

From my viewpoint I believe Roque Christensen LCSW intentionally inflicted emotional distress and mental anguish onto me without remorse and without empathy. From my understanding they coerced fallacious self-incriminating testimony from me and documented derogatory mischaracterizations and misrepresentations about me on an online federal dossier which violated my civil rights and human dignity. I believe that I was under some type of unconstitutional threat assessment surveillance program that invaded my privacy and set me up for failure and a potential false arrest. See: Elhady v. Kable (2019).

In my honest opinion I believe I am the victim of conspiracy against rights: TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same.

In my honest opinion I believe I am a victim of deprivation of rights under color of law, entrapment, discrimination, and sexual harassment. Roque Christensen and Michele Savoie-Shevlin came across as hostile, exploitative, arrogant, paranoid, bigoted, narcissistic, and lacking empathy. They had no respect for my labor rights, civil rights, or human dignity as a protected class minority. I am protesting the aforementioned duplicity, hypocrisy, and corruption.

In my honest opinion there were a lot of foreboding zersetzung vibes at East, West, and Pioneer Place apartment campuses (Plano Community Homes). At times the campuses are very quiet and clean but other times they are blatantly unpleasant. I felt that the walls have ears and eyes. A small clique or mob of hostile residents frequently loitered around the front desk or asked a lot of repetitive harassing questions with no help or support from Roque Christensen or Michele Savoie-Shevlin. From my viewpoint there was a lot of rampant fear mongering and paranoia created by management and co-workers that the senile elderly residents might burn down their kitchens and clothes dryers. It's frightening to feel that a four alarm fire could break out at any second considering the pathetic training, harassment, and lack of support from the aforementioned hypocrites. 972 424-9800. Pioneer Place 1928 K Ave, Plano, TX 75074. East Campus: 1608 L Ave, Plano, TX 75074. West: 3905 American Dr, Plano, TX 75075.

Reference for civic engagement purposes: Stare decisis precedent set by New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960). City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987). Elhady v. Kable (2019). Nader v. General Motors Corp. (25 N.Y. 2d 560, 1970). Surviving Bullies, Queen Bees & Psychopaths in the Workplace by Judge Patricia G. Barnes. Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace by Dr. Noa Davenport, Ruth Distler Schwartz, and Gail Pursell Elliott. Gaslighting: Recognize Manipulative and Emotionally Abusive People--and Break Free by Stephanie Moulton Sarkis.

The Eighth Amendment (Amendment VIII) of the United States Constitution prohibits the federal, state, and local governments of the United States, or any other government, or any corporation, private enterprise, group, or individual, from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments, in any part of the US, on US property (i.e. a US embassy), or against any US citizen, or any resident of the US.

Update by Anonymous Public Concern
Oct 08, 2019 8:54 pm EDT

Addendum to the original complaint against Roque Nix Christensen 22848 Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) regarding Plano Community Homes (East Campus, Pioneer Place, and West Campus): This is a truthful fair comment privilege opinion and criticism based civic engagement complaint that is a matter of public concern related to community well-being, safety, and government as it pertains to conspiracy against rights 18 U.S. Code § 241, an unconstitutional federal watchlist dossier, deprivation of rights under color of law Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 is a federal statute, numbered 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that allows people to sue the government for civil rights violations. (Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 1971), undue influence, entrapment, frame-ups, workplace discrimination (Title 7), hostile work environment, disparate treatment, Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. 1981, constructive discharge, workplace harassment, workplace mobbing, sexual harassment, cyber-stalking, workplace safety, labor rights, the cat's paw doctrine (Staub v. Proctor Hospital (131 S.Ct. 1186), and The Civil Rights Act of 1964.

1 comments
Add a comment
A
A
AkaHitman
, US
Feb 18, 2022 11:46 am EST
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

There is a known fear working at PCH, depending on the day, I found out that if certain employees were having issues at home with their spouses, being a male employee became a game of "do I feel sorry for her" or do I blend in with the walls. Several times I was called out for "coaching" only to have it backfire on them, which made work more unbearable by the year.

There were several incidents at the West Campus that basically became fodder for the blame game, and if you were in the head managers crosshairs, it became very unpleasant. Not only did she promote gossiping, she prompted new employees to literally spy on the older workers. After a few years of putting up with her,several of us left,resigned, or simply walked out...

Trending companies