Man Uplifted/Dr. Jack Hawks review: Man uplifted 1

Complainant S.S. was present telephonically and made a statement. She initially had a doctor-patient relationship with the Respondent in 2007, but after six (6) months it turned sexual. S.S. stated that her daughter never made an appointment and she doesn’t know where the Respondents new practice is. The Board asked S.S. when she stopped having sexual relations with Respondent; she stated it was July 2017. Complainant M.P. was present and sworn in by the court reporter. M.P. would like to testify against the Respondent for inappropriate sexual misconduct with her. Respondent took advantage of her when she was in an unstable period in her life. After experiencing several episodes of sexual misconduct with the Respondent she now has fear and trauma. She felt obligated to give sexual favors within the clinic on several occasions. She began seeing Respondent in November 2011 through August 2017. During an appointment she stated the Respondent would ask her if she wears granny panties. He then suggested she start wearing thongs. She states that the Respondent stalked her and made inappropriate remarks to her family. M.P. reported to the police of the Respondent stalking her. M.P. is asking the Board to surrender the Respondents license as a physician. The Board had a discussion with M.P. asking when she first came in contact with S.S.; she stated April 2018 through Facebook. M.P. stated that Respondent was able to remove her student loans of $135, 000 by entering in her chart notes that she was mentally retarded. Respondent admitted to having oral sex with one patient outside of the office to the Investigator during an interview. Respondent stated he had sexual contact with patient S.S. in July 2017 but only one time. The Respondent stated he never had sexual contact with M.P. Respondent stated that he did show S.S. and M.P. his nipple rings. Dr. Reiss moved to enter Executive Session for legal advice. Dr. Maitem seconded. The Board entered Executive Session at 5:26 p.m. and returned to Open Session at 5:40 p.m. The Board asked M.P. if Respondent ever displayed his penis to her, she stated yes in April 2015 after he gave her a massage and while she was filling out her disability papers. He took his pants down and she gave him oral sex. He had sex with her many times in the clinic on Thunderbird. Respondent knew he had boundary issues and took a boundary course in October 2017. Prior to the allegations he used to hug patients and now he does not because it can be misconstrued. Dr. Cunningham moved to enter Executive Session to review medical records. Dr. Reiss seconded. The Board entered Executive Session at 5:51 p.m. and returned to Open Session at 6:07 p.m. S.S. stated that she contacted Honor Health to make an appointment with the nurse practioner, whom took over the Respondents patients. She did not want to stop all medications that Respondent had been prescribing to her. Dr. Cunningham moved to enter Executive Session for legal advice. Dr. Spiekerman seconded. The Board entered Executive Session at 6:12 p.m. and returned to Open Session at 6:17 p.m. MOTION: Mr. Landau moved to refer this case to the office of Administrative Hearings for a formal hearing on Revocation of license and this is based on violation of ARS [protected]), (20), (38), (42) & (45) and incorporate the reports by the Medical Consultant and the Investigator and specifically state that the Respondent committed sexual conduct and contact with a patient, exposed chest piercings to a patient, admitted sexual conduct with a patient, medical records were incomplete, prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines at the same time. Respondent told inconsistent statements under oath regarding having sex with a patient. Dr. Spiekerman seconded. ROLL CALL VOTE: The motion carried 5-0.

I’d be careful trusting this doctor and his new wife @saraadycooley or @sarahhawks.

Here’s what she has to say