Menu
Login
This truthful fair comment privilege opinion and criticism based civic engagement is a matter of public concern related to community well-being as it pertains to workplace discrimination under Adrienne Cocita's supervision, hostile work environment, disparate treatment, Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. 1981, constructive discharge, workplace harassment, workplace mobbing, workplace bullying, workplace safety, labor rights, the cat's paw doctrine, and The Civil Rights Act of 1964. The intent of this truthful civic engagement is to stop bigotry in the workplace and to promote equal opportunity, caring leadership, and increased civility in workplaces for minorities.
Regarding a matter of public concern from my viewpoint I worked under Adrienne Cocita's hostile supervision at a home building construction company in the Far North Dallas area of Texas more than a few years ago which caused me long-term mental anguish, emotional distress, and damage to my dignified reputation. From my viewpoint I believe Adrienne pontificated prejudicial harassment and gish gallop against me that injured my reputation, called into question my honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation and thereby exposed me to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or financial injury (I was eventually unfairly laid off). Because of that I believe that I was lowered in the estimation of the community and others were deterred from associating with me. In my honest opinion as an ethnic minority I believe that I was treated very unfairly, harassed, and discriminated against by Adrienne Cocita. From my viewpoint the negativity, bigotry, and conflicting messages I experienced outweighed the positives.
From my viewpoint as a minority it was a traumatizing nightmarish tribulation for me to work for Adrienne Cocita at the home building construction company for these following reasons: from my viewpoint Adrienne showed a callous lack of concern regarding my development and advancement with the company. In my honest opinion she wrongfully enabled other belligerent white female workers at the home builders office (Holly Williams and Angela Asplin also known as Ange Asplin) to yell at me, blame me, and to verbalize fallacious gish gallop diatribes against my performance and my good reputation. From my viewpoint Adrienne gave blatant favoritism towards white female workers (Holly Williams and Angela Asplin) which offended me. From my viewpoint Adrienne Cocita incited a workplace mobbing or constructive discharge against me which caused me emotional distress. When I wanted to leave the office they bullied me to stay and prevented me from leaving the office which caused me mental anguish. I felt as if I were figuratively locked up in a prison cell while working with the aforementioned pugnacious bigots. In my honest opinion Adrienne Cocita unfairly put me under workplace surveillance and scrutinized, profiled, and documented everything I said and did which caused me mental anguish. Adrienne Cocita deceptively used flattery and built up false hope to string me along and to prevent me from resigning when the mental anguish that she caused me became overwhelming. She unfairly strung me along with false hope and mixed messages and then she capriciously laid me off after I accomplished consistently excellent work and politely put up with her distressing abuse of power. In my honest opinion Adrienne Cocita capriciously pontificated unfair conflicting messages and instructions that confused and frustrated me. From my viewpoint she was arrogantly withholding and intermittently lied to me about not having the right amount of office resources available which impeded on my ability to complete the task that she continued to harass me about. In my honest opinion she occasionally staged double-binding tribulations so that I would look suspicious and inept. Adrienne Cocita's circular strawman arguments and doublespeak frequently caused me frustration and interfered with my work projects. She intermittently ignored my excellent work performance and angrily over-focused on frivolous trivialities. In my honest opinion she blatantly overloaded me with work and then aggressively complained that I was moving too slow. Adrienne Cocita yelled and shouted at me to work faster and to do a lot more work while other workers were not treated that way which caused me emotional distress. In my honest opinion the more work projects that I accomplished the angrier and more ungrateful she became. From my viewpoint Adrienne and the aforementioned workers interrupted me and yelled at me when I tried to speak honestly about matters of public interest as it pertained to my civil rights, my labor rights, my experiences, my reputation, my human dignity, my viewpoints, and the work projects.
Additionally, regarding matters of public concern, fair criticism, and my honest opinions from my viewpoint I believe Adrienne Cocita reinforced negative stereotypes by blatantly treating me with suspicion as if I were a dangerous criminal. From my viewpoint I believe she wrongfully accused me of making threats or engaging in moral turpitude which defamed my character. In my honest opinion she made threats to call the authorities on me when I wanted to leave the office because of the emotional distress that she caused me. In my honest opinion she dramatically exaggerated workplace trivialities and small misunderstandings and made degrading false accusations against my work ethic. From my viewpoint she rudely questioned my reputation and integrity in front of other workers causing me humiliation. She conducted unfair workplace investigations against me yet would not let me resign with dignity. She unfairly questioned me about the type of ladies that I like to go out with on dates. Adrienne Cocita rudely mocked and taunted me like a belligerent schoolyard bully which was humiliating and offensive to me. She angrily talked over me in boorishly unprofessional ways so that I was unable to finish verbalizing my sentences which also made me feel fearful in her presence. She arbitrarily interrupted me with angry outbursts of disrespectful sarcasm yet treated others with respect. In my honest opinion she had poor listening and communication skills when she interacted with me. From my viewpoint she passive aggressively stonewalled when I asked her questions related to work. She intermittently misconstrued and distorted what I said which caused a chain reaction of aggravating misunderstandings. In my honest opinion and from my experiences with her I believe I was repeatedly scapegoated, harassed, defamed, and setup for failure in a discriminatory cycle of abuse. Ultimately, from my viewpoint I believe that Adrienne Cocita exploited me, harassed me, and wasted my time. Furthermore, in my honest opinion I believe Adrienne Cocita lacked empathy towards me and she seemed to have a lot of disconcerting anger issues that she unfairly displaced onto me. In my honest opinion I believe I was misclassified as an independent contractor. From my viewpoint I probably should have been classified as an employee so as to enjoy the full benefits associated with that.
Resources for civic engagement purposes:
Denco, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 541 U.S. 369 (2004)
Surviving Bullies, Queen Bees & Psychopaths in the Workplace by Judge Patricia G. Barnes.
Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace by Dr. Noa Davenport, Ruth Distler Schwartz, and Gail Pursell Elliott.
