I've acquired many pups from Nate/SportwaffenK9 over the years. In each case he provided a clearly worded and detailed health guarantee which gave me confidence that should any unfortunate and unforeseen health issue arise that was not caused by neglect, a replacement pup would be provided. The contract clearly spelled out what my responsibilities were as the buyer: provide adequate vet care including all innocuations, quality food, etc. And if the pup developed a health issue, provide vet records. Reading this complaint raises a lot of questions regarding the character of this person. Like another person commented, how is the breeder to know the buyer didn't just sell the pup, let it run away, or ingest something toxic because the buyer was negligent. Asking the breeder to now make good on a pup you cannot provide vet records for is like going to Kohls and demanding money back or a replacement for a coat you claim you purhased there, but you no longer have in your possession.
