I am sure Robin has at least a few clients who are happy. That does not make up for the fact that she acts irresponsibly and without regard when something goes wrong.
Just read her own comments...does a professional, responsible and caring breeder tell other to "get a life" and call them "idiots". She doesn't need others to make her look bad, she does a good job of it herself.
These are my comments to "Michael Schulder", whoever that may be.
Clearly, you are not truly committed to solving anything professionally or amicably, as you continue to perpetuate Robin's lies.
IT IS UNTRUE that I took my problems with Robin Schulder and Bulldogs R Us directly to this website. My family and I spent many, many weeks trying to come to a reasonable and fair agreement with Robin prior to posting on this website - to no avail. When there was finally no excuse left for Robin to use, she just plain declined any responsibility and refused to cooperate any further. I even contacted her one more time via email (it became very clear early on that a paper trail was necessary as she lied and twisted the truth constantly) asking her to reconsider before taking further formal legal action. She declined. And the fact you ask that I contact YOU all these months later is ludicrous.
Now let me make a few things perfectly clear for you "Michael" and anyone else reading this site. Once and for all.
1. IT IS UNTRUE that I stayed at your home for "quite a while" and I never stated that the dog showed symptoms of sickness while there. When I called Robin the second we got home to say she declined to give us any papers or receipts (and we FOOLISHLY left without them) I mentioned to her that the dog was making a "gagging" noise in the car, but we assumed he had perhaps eaten some of the newspaper in the crate. FORGIVE US FOR NOT RECOGNIZING KENNEL COUGH, FOR WE HAD NEVER BEEN SCAMMED BY A DOG BREEDER BEFORE. And by the way, WE HAVE YET TO RECEIVE ANY PAPERS ON THE DOG. You do know, Mr. Esquire, this is against the Pet Lemon Law that you quote.
2. IT IS UNTRUE that Robin was not aware of the dog's sickness. We were in constant contact with Robin about it. The idea that you and Robin have reverted to the premise that she was not made aware of the dog'g sickness early enough is not only ridiculous but stupid since WE ALSO HAVE PHONE RECORDS, EMAILS AND FAX RECEIPTS TO PROVE IT.
3. IT IS UNTRUE that I had no response to Robin's offer to move the dog to her vet for care. We did consider it as we, too, were concerned with the rising cost of his care. Do you really think we bought a dog to pay thousands of dollars in vet bills within weeks? AS ROBIN KNOWS OUR ANIMAL HOSPITAL PRACTICALLY MATCHED THE DISCOUNTED COST OF CARE SHE QUOTED BY HER VET. SHE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT. Considering the puppy started to show signs of improvement, we were weary to move him and put him under additional stress. Thank God we didn't, who knows what tricks she would have pulled. She was even suggesting she TREAT A PUPPY WITH PNEUMONIA AT HOME. Again, the Pet Lemon Law entitles me to select a vet of my choice, it does not entitle Robin to a vet of her choice.
4. IT IS UNTRUE THAT ROBIN SCHULDER OFFERED US A REPLACEMENT PUPPY SO THEREFORE WE DID NOT DECLINE ONE. You are lying on this website when you say it and Robin lied when she stated to to the OAG. When she learned that our dog was near death, she said, and I quote, "GOD FORBID THE DOG DIES, I WILL GIVE YOU ANOTHER ONE". I TOLD HER THAT IF OUR DOG DIED, I WOULD NOT WANT ANOTHER DOG FROM HER. The only reason the dog did not die is because WE, AND THE VETERINARIANS, COMMITTED TO SAVING HIM. She did, however, offer us a replacement puppy 5 months later - after the dog was finally healthy and living in our home - when she was contacted by the BBB. Is THAT the replacement puppy you refer to?
5. IT IS UNTRUE THAT ROBIN SCHULDER OFFERED US A REFUND ON THE PUPPY, as she lied to in her response to the OAG. We were always willing to compromise with Robin and even split the cost of vet care so why wouldn't we have agreed to at least a full refund? And if you are so well-versed on the requirements of the Pet Lemon Law, why hasn't Robin and Bulldogs R Us adhered to it and paid us that much?
6. IT IS UNTRUE THAT WE LOST OUR PAYPAL DISPUTE BECAUSE OUR CLAIM WAS INVALID. When Robin refused to comensate us we tried to get compensation through PayPal for at least our deposit. However, there are unfortunately no provisions within PayPal or our credit card company to protect against the purchase of sick animals THAT ARE TREATED AND THEN KEPT. Only if we had returned the dog could they compensate us. There are just no special provisions made for the protecton of the purchase of live and sick animals through Pay Pal. Believe me, "Mr. Schulder", anyone who has ever heard our story has been disgusted by Robin's actions and sympathetic towards us.
Since you are so interested in "the truth" I thought I would provide some for you. And if you are truly interested in making amends once and for all, you may now contact me and my husband at the email address listed.
Please consider yourself contacted.
P.S. We are all sick of hearing about how "Robin feels"
Kris, you are not the only one being ignored. I, too, contacted Michael and he claimed to be intent on settling our claim as well. I asked for what I believe to be fair and reasonable, being that we have nearly $6,000 in vet bills, and have not heard from him in days...
