Menu
CB Mobile and Cell Phones Review of Jim Dick D.D.S.
Jim Dick D.D.S.

Jim Dick D.D.S. review: Misrepresentation 2

J
Author of the review
1:43 pm EDT
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

reprentative misrepresented the fact that with an exchange of mobile phones within the thirty day window for exchange that it was not possible to have a month to month (not a two year contract) arrangement. the manager denies that I told his agent that I was only interested in obtaining new phones in exchange if and only if there was a month to month option. Representative will not take the phones back saying that I should have known that to receive new phones with an exchange must carry with it a two year contract. Again the agent specifically told me that this was possible.

Resolved

The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

2 comments
Add a comment
K
K
Keith Legg
Atlanta, US
Nov 05, 2008 9:43 am EST

Ok, But, What is the real condition of Your mouth? Could have been quite some complications technically. I am not a dentist but I believe one could have very different conditions that could warrant such a charge and even more. Your claim lacks data and as such is mute! KL

H
H
hbgguy11
Harrisburg, US
Jul 18, 2011 9:12 pm EDT

Listen man i dont want to insult you or anything but did you sign a contract or not? If you signed a 2 year contract and are on here saying I signed a two year contract but didnt know you would sound kind of stupid and ignorant. You cant tell me you haphazardly sign papers when getting a new service wihout at least glancing over the document and believe me they dont try to hide where i says contract at all on these papers. If you did sign it then quit crying about it and in the future blame yourself for not reading documents we sign.

Trending companies