Menu
Login
I hate to submit this; however, this class is providing no actual masters level education or feedback. The professor, Dr. Parkinson, weekly discussion questions are mostly open ended and not very in depth to the level of education being sought, sometime even nonsensical as its poorly written or not fully coherent.
The first week's discussion question provided no rubric until after grades were posted leading to unknown grading scale as well as an email about adding further to required information for grading when it was not in a formal request put out to the class in an efficient manner.
The university pushes religiously, as they should, on advisement against plagiarism, however, each time the professor posts her own discussion response to ours it is copy/paste and provides just more information about what we already discussed instead of providing further dialogue for continued discussion.
We are also held to provide EITHER APA 7 format or Blue Book format when providing discussion or papers which creates confusion as to a standard of execution for assigned homework.
Country of complaint: United States
Desired outcome: Audit of the Professor's material for more formalized standard material, worthy of paid for master's level programming.
Have further reviewed her discussion responses and found her very unprofessional and demeaning of a student.
Please reference the attachment where she condescends and demeans a student in the first sentence. The second paragraph is the beginning of her copy paste post that appears on all other students' discussion posts.
