Case was frivolous she says but harming her reputation. LOL.
The outcome was frivolous only because Judge William J. Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court is dishonest and not fair. He is personally familiar with her, Jeanne Barron - apparently but she influenced plaintiff’s attorney, James G. Schmier. He Schmier worked for Barron not plaintiff, his client. He, additionally suppressed material facts. She was familiar with Ms. “X” plaintiff via Case no. [protected]-NZ in the Oakland County Circuit Court. Ms “X” plaintiff prevailed in that case involving same defendant as that in Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court. Case No. [protected]-NZ with a signed and sealed Release and Settlement agreement. She, Jeanne Barron signed that agreement. That agreement barred her from expounding on facts and or non-facts that surfaced in case no. [protected]-N via communication of any kind. She could not transport facts and or non-facts from case no [protected]-NZ (Oakland County Circuit Court) into case no. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court. She did.
Times New Roman
