Tom Mckenzie Scam review: Tom Mckenzie & Prospexx Integrated Capital 3

UNLAWFUL DEFAMATION

It is a general doctrine of law in all jurisdictions that making false public
statements against a person or firm is illegal. Commonly known as “slander” (when
verbal) or “libel” (when written), false statements to damage someone’s reputation is
called “defamation”. Defamation is defined by various laws in clear and uniform
terms: “Probably false statements of verifiable fact, that serve to undermine or
damage someone’s reputation.” It is no defence to phrase a false statement as an
“opinion”, one’s “own experience”, or as some alleged “consumer complaint”. As
long as the comments contain some false statements of fact that could be verified as
false and could or should be known to be false, then it is defamation, and it is illegal.
All defamation is illegal, and law suits against false defamers are highly
successful and collect substantial damages from the wrongdoers. Written
defamation (which applies to the Internet) is punished harshly, and damages usually
do not need to be proven, as they are assumed by law due to the written exposure to
the public. Defamation falsely accusing of fraud or professional misconduct is even
more severely punished by “treble damages” and “punitive damages”, which can be
enormous amounts of money far beyond any expected real damages to the victim.
All defamation to enforce demands is criminal as extortion or blackmail,
which are serious federal crimes in all countries. Extortion (in the USA), also called
Blackmail (in the UK), is defined in various laws in uniform terms: “Threats or
actions to damage a person’s reputation, to enforce a demand for anything the
person is not obligated to give.” Defamers who use false unlawful defamation on the
Internet, to enforce demands of things not owed to them, are committing a serious
crime. If a person is entitled to something, they are required by law to use normal
lawful “due process of law”, where an independent, objective and impartial court can
apply any signed contract that governs the transaction, if there ever was any. Using
criminal attacks by defamation to circumvent due process of law is highly illegal, and
indicates that the person defaming probably did something illegal or criminal to
sabotage the transaction by his own fault, if there ever was any transaction.
Defamers know that their false statements are illegal, and that false
defamation to enforce unlawful demands is criminal. This is why they make great
efforts to remain anonymous, to avoid both civil and criminal liability. Experience
shows that once an anonymous online defamer can be identified and their identity
exposed by a reply in that forum, they stop, disappear, or begin modifying their
statements to back-track on their lies.