DogFoodAdvisor
reviews and complaints

I used to check out dogfoodadvisor.com a lot cause that site was the bomb. It was one of a kind, cause it let you know about the ingredients in the food for your pup. And they rated that shizzle based on the first 3 ingredients (that make up like 75% of the weight in the bag) and any other suspect ingredients that follow. It was hella thorough, but it wasn't too hard to figure out neither.
But now, I'm seeing that some of these brands and foods that used to only get like 2 stars are suddenly getting 5. And it's weird cause the ingredients don't even look that different. I don't know if it's cause somebody's giving them money to make them look good or maybe the dudes that own the site now are trying to make more money. But I can't trust it no more, and it's a shame cause I used to think it was the real deal.

This website called DogFoodAdvisor got me a little worried about the safety of my precious dog's nutrition. I mean, who in their right mind would take advice from a dentist when it comes to feeding our furry friends? That's what I was thinking until I saw that there's no licensed veterinarian or nutritionist behind the posts either. How can somebody who's not specialized in animal nutrition give proper advice?

What's even more disappointing is that the person running this website has no background in science to back up their recommendations! It's like they're just making it up as they go and trying to sound like an expert. But guess what? That's not how it works in the real world of animal nutrition.

I'm not saying that every single post on this website is bad, but we have to be careful with the information we get from the internet. Nowadays, there's so much fake news and misinformation going around that it's hard to know what's really true.

I believe that we should rely on sound nutrition advice that's coming from professionals who have the proper education, training, and experience. And that means following FDA/AAFCO guidelines and the latest scientific information on feeding and nutrition for our pets.

It's a shame that people who contribute to websites like DogFoodAdvisor seem to ignore these important sources of knowledge. They're making us and our pets suffer the consequences of their unprofessional and unscientific advice.

So, if you really care about your pet's health and wellbeing, don't trust just any website or blogger out there. Find a licensed veterinarian or certified animal nutritionist who can give you accurate and reliable information. Don't just settle for anything less than the best, because your pet deserves it!

Ya know, I gotta be honest - I was a little skeptical of dogfoodadvisor.com at first. Their marketing tactics kinda freaked me out, y'know? I mean, there's so many sketchy sites out there using the same methods to scam people. But I decided to give it a chance anyways and lemme tell ya - I'm glad I did.

Sure, it took me a minute to actually find a way to give feedback (they really should make that easier for non-members like me), but once I got past that initial hurdle, I was pretty impressed. They've got a ton of info on all sorts of different dog foods, and it's all broken down in a way that's super easy to understand. Plus, they update the site constantly, so you know you're getting the most up-to-date info.

Now, I will say that the site can be a little overwhelming at times. There's just so much information, it can be hard to know where to start. And yeah, some of their reviews can be a bit long-winded - but hey, at least they're thorough, right? And honestly, I'd rather have too much info than not enough.

So overall, I think dogfoodadvisor.com is a pretty solid resource for anyone looking to learn more about the food they're feeding their furry friend. Yeah, their marketing tactics might be a little iffy, but don't let that scare you away - the actual site is legit.

It's really unfortunate that some people give bad reviews on Dog Food Advisor. I noticed that there are some users, such as Jackie L, Tom D, Mandy J, Joe M, Tanya G, Sugar A, and A.D, who seem to have bad experiences with DFA, but if you pay attention, you will realize that they are all the same person using different names to make it look like many people had issues. It's so obvious that it's only one person behind all the posts that anyone can tell! I heard that they were banned from the website because this behavior is against the rules. The issue wasn't that they disagreed with others on the platform, but rather that they used multiple fake names, similar to what they did here. They posted on DFA as Sue, Laura, David, Peter, Dogs on the hill, and many other names that I can't remember. I wonder who they are and what's wrong with them. It is too funny that people like Jackie L and Tom D wrote the exact same review word for word. They probably think they fooled us, but they are just the same person using different fake identities. How pitiful! LOL.

But despite these negative reviews, I think Dog Food Advisor is an excellent resource for any dog owner. When I discovered the site, I was thrilled to find so much information about different dog food brands and how they rate for quality and nutrition. I think it's important to know what you're feeding your pet and what's in their food. I particularly appreciate the website's easy-to-use rating system, which makes it simple to compare different dog food products and make the best decision for my furry friend. The website's expert reviews are also helpful and informative.

Overall, I think Dog Food Advisor is one of the best sites for dog food information and reviews. I would recommend it to anyone looking to make informed choices about their pet's diet. The negative reviews from a single person should not discourage anyone from using this valuable resource.

DogFoodAdvisor is a good website where you can find info on dog food.Nice that they have photos of each kind.Not very informative. I wish they had a better comparison chart, but a quick stroll through the articles and reviews can tell you a lot about your dog's food.Contains a lot of amazing information and enlightening opinions that you can use to become a better pet owner. They have an animal nutrition section that is helpful in deciding what to feed your dog.

Though, some of the so-called top contributors did not appreciate me pointing out their flaws in their studies and quickly took it personally, leaving me with 5 down votes on every vote while they gave themselves 5 up votes. It doesn't help that they have no real credentials in the field and are not really experts-just people trying to convey their own thoughts.

They were absolutely nasty about it, and even went as far as blocking me. Though I'm not exactly sure what I did wrong, as I only spoke honestly about their flaws in their findings. Maybe they only want people to read what they want them to read? That's not very fair or informative at all.

One of the biggest issues is their promotion of raw diets, which, while great for some dogs, may not be an ideal fit for others. It's critical to recall that all dogs have special nutritional requirements, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to pet nutrition.

Aside from that, the photos of each dog food brand are fantastic, and you can learn a lot about each product by merely scanning through the reviews. They need to work on their data presentation a bit more to provide a more thorough comparison of the products, but it's still a helpful resource.

It's clear that there's some kind of conflict going on on DogFoodAdvisor (dogfoodadvisor.com) between the "regulars" and other users who disagree with them. What's concerning is that the "regulars" seem to be allowed to break the website's rules and make racist comments, while other users get banned for no good reason. The name-calling is pretty harsh, too - things like calling people "ignorant" or "misguided hippies" (which is definitely racist). Mike, the site's editor, seems to defend the "regulars" and accuse other users of being "cyber stalkers" or "fraudulent posters with intent to deceive." It's pretty intense language, and it's hard to believe that everyone Mike accuses is actually doing something wrong.

I have to say that I'm not totally convinced by the editor's strong words. It seems like he's just trying to protect his group of followers and make everyone else look bad. I'm sure that some people might post under an alternative ID, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're being fraudulent - maybe they just got banned from the site and wanted to keep talking. Either way, it's not illegal to use a different ID.

In the past week, I've seen at least eight posts that were allowed but then got deleted because they questioned the editor's food choices. I've been following this site for a while now, and I really hope that someone will speak up against the bullying and mistreatment that so many people have experienced. It's not okay to let a group of people break the rules and make others feel unwelcome. Plus, the editor's information seems to be in violation of FTC rules, which is a whole other issue. A disclaimer doesn't magically make false claims okay.

Mike Sagaman ain't no expert, ya know? He ain't no medical doctor, nurse, vet, or nutritionist with a license. He's just got some regular contributors who make big claims about dog food, but it ain't accurate and ain't got no real science to back it up. These contributors don't have no real credentials either, but they pretend to know it all about dog food and pretend to be experts. But really, they wrong way more often than they right.

If someone tries to disagree with their so-called "expertise" and have some real scientific evidence to back it up, these same 5-6 people will flag them so hard they'll end up with 30 flags! And then Mike just blocks them and deletes their comments while keeping the inaccurate, mean posts from his regular contributors. Ain't that just plain wrong?

These people used to praise Diamond dog food, but now that folks are reviewing it and pointing out the use of low quality ingredients, well now all of a sudden, they agree! And if you bring up raw dog food, they just get quiet and pretend like they never recommended it. But that 40% highly processed rendered meat protein they do recommend? Well, that just gives dogs loose stools and diarrhea!

And get this: despite having numerous recalls, these foods still get 5-star ratings while companies that never had a recall and use high quality ingredients get only 4 stars! But if you point that out, you'll just get bullied and blocked. Ain't that just backwards?

Their claims about meat protein being better than plant protein? It's just ain't true, folks! There's no scientific evidence that plant protein is any lower quality than meat protein. In fact, peas, lentils, and vegetables are good for dogs! Even cheese is okay! But if you mention that, you'll just get bullied, flagged, deleted, and blocked!

So, in the end, this website just provides biased information that ain't scientific at all. Mike Sagaman will even make up stories about you, saying you got multiple identities and the same IP address as other folks you ain't never even met, just to get rid of you!

Don't believe these people when it comes to dog food! Most of them used to feed their dogs Purina until recently and they don't have no real credentials to back up their false claims!

The website DogFoodAdvisor (dogfoodadvisor.com) has some serious issues. For one, the testimonials for the dog foods reviewed on the site seem questionable at best. The so-called "regulars" on the site often act as if they are experts in dog nutrition when in reality they probably just google information like anyone else. And it's not just their lack of expertise that's concerning - they also like to throw around the name Karen Becker like she's the only authority on animal nutrition, which is simply not true.

What's most concerning, though, is that so many people seem to be taking advice from these self-proclaimed experts. It's sad to see so much trust placed in people who honestly don't know much more than the average pet owner. These people have way too much time on their hands, spending endless hours posting comments on the site.

Another disturbing aspect of the site is the fact that some of the regulars claim that spaying or neutering your pet is unhealthy. This is simply not true - in fact, it's well-documented that altered animals tend to live longer and healthier lives. The regulars seem to believe that only "irresponsible" pet owners contribute to pet overpopulation, but the truth is that accidents can happen to anyone.

In the end, it seems that DogFoodAdvisor is a place for bored, judgemental housewives to brag about how much they spend on their pets' food. But really, they're probably just feeding their pets the same run-of-the-mill food that the rest of us do. It's important to do your own research and find what's best for your furry friends, rather than relying on the questionable advice of strangers on the internet.

It's also worth noting that the site seems to have a bit of a censorship problem - they'll block you if you speak out too strongly against them. And to top it all off, they've even been known to change negative comments into positive ones. All in all, there are much better resources out there when it comes to researching dog food - so it's best to steer clear of this site altogether.

I recently had an experience on DogFoodAdvisor that left me feeling frustrated and confused. I left a comment that didn't seem to align with the opinions of some members and one person flagged me. Next thing I knew, all of my comments were deleted. I wasn't given a chance to explain myself or even verify my identity as I was supposedly asked to do. Mike Sagaman claimed he sent me an email to confirm my identity, but I never received anything. It seems like a lame excuse to just delete my posts.

I've noticed that a lot of other people have had similar experiences. If you post something that goes against the beliefs of the site's groupies, you're likely to get flagged and have your comments scrubbed. The team at DogFoodAdvisor claims to know what's best for our pets, but the reality is that they only recommend their own preferred brands. They seem to love anything with cheap meat meal, but they won't acknowledge the benefits of high-quality plant-based proteins or real, human-grade meats.

I prefer to feed my dogs medication-free ingredients that I would feel comfortable eating myself. That means looking for high-quality plant-based products and human-grade meats, not cheap meat meals and products imported from China. It's well-known that some of the cheaper options can cause digestive problems and diarrhea. I don't want to take any risks with my furry friends.

What's frustrating is that the groupies on DogFoodAdvisor seem to chase away anyone who disagrees with them. If you're a professional with some credentials in the industry, they'll chase you away too. The site administrator doesn't seem to care much about the accuracy of his information either. He claims to take into account the average ash content of dog foods, but this doesn't always accurately represent what's in a specific brand. For example, Fromm has only 6% ash in their foods, while Canine Caviar has 10%. That's a pretty big difference, so why not contact the companies and get the accurate data?

In the end, I've decided to stick with brands that I know and trust, like Halo, Pinnacle, and Fromm. These brands prioritize high-quality ingredients and are easy on my dog's digestive system. I don't want to take risks with cheap, low-quality meals that could potentially harm my precious pups.

DogFoodAdvisor is a website that provides information about dog food. It is, however, noticeable that there is an ongoing conflict between the regulars and other users who disagree with them. The rules of the website are unevenly enforced, and those who are part of the regulars are allowed to post racist comments, while others are banned permanently without valid reasons. The name-calling is toxic and uncivil, and it is done by a number of regulars who seem to think they are entitled to special privileges.

Mike, the editor of DogFoodAdvisor, is quick to defend the regulars and attack others who criticize them. He uses strong words like "cyber stalkers" and "fraudulent posters", even though there is no evidence to support these claims. Meanwhile, users like Pattyvaugh, Hounddog, Shawna, Betsy Greer, LabsRaw, Iosol, and their followers behave in ways that violate the website's rules, yet they are allowed to continue posting unchecked.

It is clear that the editor misrepresents the situation and exaggerates the misconduct of those he disagrees with. He eliminates posts critical of his dietary choices, and he has constructed a rating system based on biased claims. He is not allowed to claim that he provides unbiased information, and he is not allowed to promote certain diets without warning, especially when they have been linked to making dogs sick. Additionally, it is misleading for him to promote plans that are high in protein and high in meat content without scientific evidence.

In conclusion, the DogFoodAdvisor website has some problems with its users who are toxic and uncivil, and the editor of the website is unfair and biased. It is important for the editor to take responsibility for the misleading information on the website and for the harassment of users who are simply exercising their right to free speech. Overall, the website needs to have a more transparent policy and a more welcoming community.

I recently checked out this dog food website called DogFoodAdvisor (dogfoodadvisor.com) and let me tell you, it's pretty cool. They've got a lot of different brands of dog food listed and each one has a rating based on their own opinions and research. Now, I gotta say, I don't always agree with their opinions, you know what I mean? Sometimes it seems like they're just jumping on the latest fad diet bandwagon. But hey, at least they're giving us something to consider, right?

One thing that I really appreciate about DogFoodAdvisor is that they break down the ingredients of each brand of dog food. Sometimes it can be hard to understand what all those fancy words mean, but they explain it in a way that's easy to understand. And let me tell you, some of the stuff they put in dog food is pretty yucky. Makes me glad I stick to real food!

Now, I know some people might say that DogFoodAdvisor's ratings are biased or not based on fact. But let's be real here, folks. There's no such thing as complete objectivity. Everyone's got an opinion, even if they claim they don't. And when it comes to dog food, I think it's important to hear from people who have actually tried different brands and can tell us what worked for their furry friend.

Overall, I think DogFoodAdvisor is a pretty helpful resource for dog owners. Sure, they might make some spelling and grammar errors from time to time, but who doesn't? At least they're trying to help us make informed decisions about what we feed our four-legged family members.

DogFoodAdvisor (dot) com ain't what she used to be y'all. I mean, like, seriously. Back in the day, she used to be a pretty good place to go for some information on what to feed your pup. But lately, I'm not so sure.

Firstly, the site has undergone some changes, and not all of them for the better. It seems like they're now trying to sell some brands over others. Like, they'll give a certain brand a good rating, but then recommend another one in their "food tips" section. I mean, what is that all about?

Secondly, the site just isn't as reliable as it used to be. Like, I used to be able to trust their ratings and recommendations. But now, I don't know if I can. It feels like they're just saying whatever to make a quick buck.

So, do I recommend DogFoodAdvisor? Honestly, I don't know anymore. Maybe take their ratings and recommendations with a grain of salt, and do your own research. 'Cause, like, you never know what kinda shady stuff people are trying to pull these days.

DogFoodAdvisor, what a bore. They rate dog food like they rate movies, but with absolutely no science to back it up. Listen, I’ve been feeding my dog the “highly recommended” dog food from this site and guess what? He got sick, the severe kind of sick that had me rushing him to the vet. And what did I find out? The dog food that had been given such a “good” rating was actually killing dogs!

There’s been a lot of attention on the recent FDA study into grain-free dog food diets. And you know what’s crazy? Many of the dog foods that DogFoodAdvisor had given high ratings to are in that study as the culprit of dogs getting ill. Some even died! I mean, come on, how can you trust a site that rates dog food without any real scientific backing? It’s irresponsible and dangerous.

Let’s be real, this site has not helped pets in any way. It’s actually harmed them. Directly contributed to dog deaths. Shame on them. Do your research, don’t trust sites like DogFoodAdvisor. Trust your vet, they are the ones with the real scientific knowledge.

This website called DogFoodAdvisor is run by a guy who says he really knows a lot of dog foodstuff. I'm not so sure about that, though. He used to be a tooth surgeon so why is he claiming he's an expert on dog food? Sounds kinda weird to me. But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

Basically, he checks out different brands of dog food and rates them and he only gives them 1 to 5 stars. Why not 10 stars? I don't know. But that's what he does. He also calculates all these percentages and stuff that totally go over my head. I mean, who cares about percentages, right?

What really bugs me though is he only looks at the first ten ingredients in the food. I don't think that's enough to really judge a brand, do you? And he also gets all picky about things that don't even matter when it comes to what dogs eat.

The worst part of all of this is that tons of dog owners go to him for advice. I don't want to know what kind of messed up stuff people are feeding their dogs based on what he says. So, if I were you, I'd just stay away from this website.

Final Thoughts: I'm not so sure about this DogFoodAdvisor website or the guy who runs it. It seems like he's just doing this as a side gig or a hobby or something. But people are actually listening to what he has to say, which scares me. So, if you're looking for some info on dog food, maybe find another resource.