The most trusted and popular consumer complaints website
Connect With: Connect with Yahoo Connect with Google Connect with Twitter Connect with LinkedIn

Recently Discussed Complaints

1. (10 mins ago)
jjshouse.com/wedding dress
received not as described
2. (11 mins ago)
kids dzire
fraud lady/
3. (11 mins ago)
esc welcome loans uk
ripped off brokers fee without consent
4. (12 mins ago)
Eureka Forbes/Aquaguard Infiniti
Cheat booking of Aquaguard Infiniti
5. (14 mins ago)
CIA
if letter is valid

Consumer Tips & Tricks

Latest News & Stories

Latest Questions

VoteAndDate.com

Chase Home Finance/JPMorgan/Ashland Condomininium, as well as other names, Chicago, Illinois Complaints & Reviews - Cook County Public Court Docket

Review all Chase Home Finance/JPMorgan/Ashland Condomininium, as well as other names, Chicago, Illinois complaints

Chase Home Finance/JPMorgan/Ashland Condomininium, as well as other names

Posted: 2010-01-22 by   Josie Marie harris
Cook County Public Court Docket
Complaint Rating:  0 % with 0 votes
Company information:
Cook County Recorder of Deeds
Chicago, Illinois
United States
NOTICE FILED
Attorney: PRO SE


Activity Date: 11/16/2009 Participant: CHASE HOME FINANCE
NOTICE OF FILING FILED
Attorney: QUERREY HARROW LTD


Activity Date: 11/16/2009 Participant: CHASE HOME FINANCE
PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
Attorney: QUERREY HARROW LTD


Activity Date: 11/16/2009 Participant: HARRIS JOSIE
PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
Attorney: PRO SE


Activity Date: 11/20/2009 Participant: HARRIS JOSIE
COMPLY - ALLOWED -
Court Room: 2408
Judge: FLYNN, PETER


Activity Date: 11/20/2009 Participant: HARRIS JOSIE
COURTS MOTION THIS CASE IS TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT
Court Room: 2408
Judge: FLYNN, PETER


Activity Date: 1/14/2010 Participant: HARRIS JOSIE
COMPLY - ALLOWED -
Court Room: 2408
Judge: FLYNN, PETER


Activity Date: 1/14/2010 Participant: CHASE HOME FIN NCE
MOTION TO - DENIED -
Court Room: 2408
Judge: FLYNN, PETER


The judge has not decided whether the complaint may go forth. However, Ashland filed a Motion using the caption of the first complaint that was dismissed. They then made an argument in their motion and made it appear that we were "at issue" using terminology and issue arguments. These documents have become part of the public record and are then filed within the docket system as if an order was issued by the judge. This is a formal docket but however, it informally supports the lawyers by the personnel working within the system. The judge has not issued an order regarding Harris's amended complaint but the docket makes it appear as if the complaint was allowed to go forth and Harris has answered. This is part of the informal system at work. It is a method used to confuse pro se litigants by personnel within the filing system of chancery.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please note: Neither the Circuit Court of Cook County nor the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of Cook County warrants the accuracy, completeness, or the currency
of this data. This data is not an official record of the Court or the Clerk and may
not be represented as an official court record.

If data does not appear in a specific field, we likely do not have the responsive data
in our master database.
Comments United States Banks
Share with others:   Digg it!  Del.ici.ous  Yahoo My Web  Share on Twitter  Facebook My Web
Was the above complaint useful to you?    

Post your Comment

Please check text spelling before submitting a comment
Your attitude towards ComplaintAgree Neutral Disagree
Comment text
Spell Check
Attach photos (optional)

Videos

Email Phishing Scam

Latest Groups

Today's Mess-Up Photo


RSS Feed
 
     
 

Login

Email:
Password:

Forgot your password?