Menu
For Business Write a review File a complaint
Cathedral City Police Department Customer Service Phone, Email, Contacts

Cathedral City Police Department
Reviews and Complaints

Learn how the rating is calculated

2.3 3 Complaints
Claim Your Business
Take control of your profile: address complaints and engage with reviews
Write a review File a complaint

Cathedral City Police Department Complaints 3

ComplaintsBoard
J
12:23 pm EDT
Verified customer The reviewer confirmed their account using Facebook. Learn more
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

I'm probably one of the safest drivers in CC because I'm newer here from WA state. This is in regards to speeding violation citation # CC302824 case # CC302824JR. Cathedral Canyon goes from 35mph to 25mph. I was going 36 when Officer Bird ticketed me for going 36mph. Yes I was speeding and broke the law. I was an easy soft target, a white male in an...

Read full review of Cathedral City Police Department
ComplaintsBoard
R
7:45 pm EDT

Cathedral City Police Department Police department towing my car with out notice when perfectly parked

I was heading down from indio hills had. Purchased a 2013 Camry was bring in to cathedral city to get some work on it when I had a flat. With no spear I take of to get a wheel and as I return car was gone left to walk with my wheel at 100 plus temp I did when I reached a place to call after some heat execution I called city of cathedral City only to find no recorded of a tow from my location well eventually after making some phone call despatch manages to find it but wasn't filed . Well to my concern I was going that morning to take car of name change I don't under stand what reason they had to pick up the car if it was legally parked and if something was up with my registration they could if put a Ticket but no now I got to pay 100 plus to get realease for police department and so far 247 tow plus another 400 around 600 tow so far all cause I got a flat and more likely cause I got a nail from the street

Desired outcome: I shouldn't have to pay theses fees

Read full review of Cathedral City Police Department
Hide full review
ComplaintsBoard
T
6:06 pm EDT
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

Cathedral City Police Department Police Misconduct

“Document B”
CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMPLAINT
It appears that my still pending August 19, 2008, complaints (Incident#1 & Incident#2) against the Cathedral City Police Department (CCPD) have failed to accomplish the intended objective which should have put an immediate STOP to the unprovoked and deliberate attacks of harassment against me. Now harassment Incident#3 has occurred even though CCPD’s Investigator Lieutenant Laura Hanlon is in the midst of an official inquiry into my previous harassment complaints (See attached previously filed August 19, 2008 complaint documents labeled, “Document A”, “Incident #1: Racial Profiling”, and “Incident#2: Police Harassment Due to Calling 911 on Fellow Police Officer Who I Accused of Racial Profiling”).

The most recent incident of harassment occurred on November 22, 2008, at about 4:49am, which CCPD conspired with residents who—living at home address 31020 San Eljay, Cathedral City, CA 92234 (hearafter referred to as “31020 San Eljay”)—allowed three CCPD police officers to use their property as a “stake-out”.

The CCPD officers’ conspiracy was to falsely activate the resident’s home alarm surveillance system between the hours of 4:45am to 5:00am with the sole purpose to harass me (See attached complaint labeled, “Incident#3: Sophisticated Home Video Security System Records Undeniable Proof That The Cathedral City Police Department Used Home Address 31020 San Eljay As A ‘Stake-Out’ With the Intent to Further Harass Me Due To My Still Pending August 19, 2008, Complaints Titled ‘Incident #1: Racial Profiling’ and ‘Incident#2: Police Harassment Due to Calling 911 on Fellow Police Officer Who I Accused of Racial Profiling’ ”).

Quite obviously, this 3rd Incident of harassment by CCPD is no mere coincidence for the following reasons: (1) 31020 San Eljay is located just 278 feet (less than a half a block) west of my girlfriend’s house and lies directly in my “to and from” walking path, (2) Over a three year period, neither I nor my girlfriend--who lives less than 278 feet away from this home--have NOT once heard this home alarm security system “going-off”, and (4) Most importantly, the timing of this incident occurs, almost exactly, at the same time that I normally would leave my girlfriend’s house and about the same time I previously accused CCPD with Incidents #1 & #2. Notably, the odds of this alarm “going-off” around the same time as my previous two incidents with the CCPD are astronomical!

Similarly, the degree of suspicion involving this incident is enormous since: I initially did not hear an alarm sounding, did not see any inside house lights turned-on, did not see any outside security floodlights turned-on, did not see any residents inside the home scrambling about as if their burglar alarm has just activated, and--most importantly--I did not see any police officers with flashlights vigorously searching outside the perimeter of the property for a suspected burglar. For these reasons, I applaud CCPD’s choice in selecting this particular home to use for their elaborate but ill-conceived conspiracy plan because any person who lives or has lived in this community knows that 31020 San Eljay is a centerpiece in the neighborhood with its impressive size and its quite sophisticated home alarm surveillance system which has the capacity to capture high-resolution video, to log precise date & time stamps, to store months of recorded information on its computer hard drive, etc. With this information, I propose to validate my allegations and proofs (See attached document labeled, “Allegations & Proofs”). To be more visually illustrative, a daytime photograph by Google Inc.--with smaller inset photo--clearly depicts 31020 San Eljay advanced surveillance system (See attached photograph labeled, “Exhibit A-Still Cameras, 360 Degree Cameras, Motion Detectors, Floodlights” and inset photograph labeled, “Exhibit A-Early Morning”).

To conclude, this 3rd incident of unprovoked harassment has left me emotionally distressed, traumatized, and filled with anxiety in knowing that a possible future incident of CCPD harassment may leave me either severely physically injured or dead. In addition, this sporadic but continual harassment against me is a clear violation of my civil rights.

Therefore, I request a full investigation into this 3rd incident of police misconduct & harassment.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Cc: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, D.C.
Cc: NAACP, National Headquarters, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cc: ACLU Campaign against Police Misconduct, NY, New York.
Cc: Riverside County, Attorney General, Edmund G. Brown Jr.
Cc: Riverside County, Public Defender, Gary Windom.
Cc: City Manager of Cathedral City, Donald Bradley.
Cc: Cathedral City, Police Chief, Stan Henry.
Cc: Personal Files.

[protected]@hotmail.com

Read full review of Cathedral City Police Department
Resolved

The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

Hide full review

Cathedral City Police Department Reviews 0

Looks like Cathedral City Police Department has no reviews yet.
Write a review
Subscribe to receive notifications of all new customer feedback

If you represent Cathedral City Police Department, take charge of your business profile by claiming it and stay informed about any new reviews or complaints submitted.

👉 Claim your business

Overview of Cathedral City Police Department complaint handling

Cathedral City Police Department reviews first appeared on Complaints Board on Jul 11, 2009. The latest review CCPD priorities was posted on Oct 13, 2023. The latest complaint Police Misconduct was resolved on Jul 11, 2009. Cathedral City Police Department has an average consumer rating of 2 stars from 3 reviews. Cathedral City Police Department has resolved 1 complaints.
Trust badge
Collect Your Trust Badge
Be recognized for outstanding customer service
  1. Cathedral City Police Department Contacts

  2. Cathedral City Police Department phone numbers
    +1 (760) 770-0300
    +1 (760) 770-0300
    Click up if you have successfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling +1 (760) 770-0300 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling +1 (760) 770-0300 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling +1 (760) 770-0300 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling +1 (760) 770-0300 phone number
    (760) 770-0362
    (760) 770-0362
    Click up if you have successfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling (760) 770-0362 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling (760) 770-0362 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling (760) 770-0362 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached Cathedral City Police Department by calling (760) 770-0362 phone number
  3. Cathedral City Police Department address
    68700 Ave Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City, California, 92234, United States
  4. Cathedral City Police Department social media
  5. Andrew
    Checked and verified by Andrew This contact information is personally checked and verified by the ComplaintsBoard representative. Learn more
    May 24, 2024
Cathedral City Police Department Category
Cathedral City Police Department is ranked 3 among 4 companies in the Public Safety category

Our Commitment

We stand for unbiased reviews

We make sure all complaints and reviews are from real people sharing genuine experiences.

We help resolving issues

We offer easy tools for businesses and reviewers to solve issues together. Learn how it works.

We advocate freedom of speech

We support and promote the right for reviewers to express their opinions and ideas freely without censorship or restrictions, as long as it's respectful and within our Terms and Conditions, of course ;)

We ensure transparent and fair ratings

Our rating system is open and honest, ensuring unbiased evaluations for all businesses on the platform. Learn more.

We care about your privacy

Personal details of reviewers are strictly confidential and hidden from everyone.

We are easy, free and open to everyone

Our website is designed to be user-friendly, accessible, and absolutely free for everyone to use.