ScreenRant
reviews and complaints

As a passionate fan of movies and TV shows, I was excited to explore ScreenRant for the latest news and reviews. However, my experience was far from satisfactory. The articles were repetitive, lacking depth, and often felt like they were generated by AI. It was evident that some writers may have resorted to plagiarism or rushed writing to meet daily quotas. The content failed to engage me, and the quality was questionable. It's disheartening to see a platform with such potential fall short in delivering valuable insights and entertainment. ScreenRant, please take note and strive for better quality to truly captivate your audience.

Not much serious reporting going on here, they appear ***@FilmClickbate on a regular basis which says a lot. There youtube stuff can be okay at times, but mostly just filler.

Screen rant is a fun place for people to learn about cool easter eggs, however SPOILER ALERT! Watch the movie first. Even better watch ALL the movies, easter eggs may be fun cool connections about movies but they have another name, spoilers!

Unlike many other sites, they keep their content updated. Loved reading their in-depth news stories... Keep up the good work! Cheers!

Screen Rant is always up to date with their reality tv news and provides an interesting angle on topics. I'll always use their website for entertainment news!

The best thing about Screen Rant is the diversity of opinions that the site has on a regular basis, which means that you get a lot of different POVs on the site. They also cover several shows/comics/movies that don't get any attention from other websites. I feel like every site can be criticized for valid things, but I see many people hating on Screen Rant (and on similar sites) because they read this or that opinion that they really hate. However, if you actually look on the site, there's usually another article written from someone else who feels differently and provides other POVs. As a fan, I love seeing my favorite things being talked about, and I love having my assumptions challenged by diverse opinions. I really like the site and it's a shame that it gets trashed on by fans who want to live inside an echo chamber.

ScreenRant is a movie site that is quite inconsistent and illogical at times. They have articles that are based on fan art and make it seem like it's legit movie news or "what if articles". There are numerous headlines that have nothing to do with the subject at hand and articles that constantly contradict previous ones for REAL. It seems like most writers have no idea what they are talking about. They are just fake fans who write for clicks.

When I want to read late-breaking movie news or comics, I'll visit the likelihood sites like Variety or Hollywood Reporter. However, when I want something funny, I go to ScreenRant. A lot of people hate lists and fun articles, and that is fine, but I would prefer fun stuff to endless regurgitation of the same stories over and over again. For people who hate fun, there is always Deadline (which I love too). But for people who love to read fun stuff about movies and TV, ScreenRant is well worth the follow.

Despite its inconsistencies, ScreenRant is a great site for entertainment news. They have a lot of fun articles that are perfect for a quick laugh or a break from the serious news. The site is easy to navigate and has a lot of content to keep you entertained for hours. The writers are not always the most knowledgeable, but they make up for it with their enthusiasm and humor.

One of the things I love about ScreenRant is their lists. They have lists for everything from the best movies of all time to the worst superhero costumes. These lists are always entertaining and informative. They are a great way to discover new movies or TV shows that you may have missed.

Another great thing about ScreenRant is their coverage of TV shows. They have articles about all the latest shows and episodes. They also have reviews of shows that are worth watching. If you are a TV junkie like me, then ScreenRant is the perfect site for you.

In conclusion, ScreenRant is a great site for entertainment news. It may not be the most consistent or logical site out there, but it is definitely worth following. They have a lot of fun articles and lists that are perfect for a quick laugh or a break from the serious news. If you love movies and TV shows, then ScreenRant is the site for you.

Screenrant is a website that pays its writers, which is already a good thing. However, that's pretty much the only good thing about this company. Most of the articles are just plain lies, and they spoil shows and movies in their own titles. This is not good when it shows up in people's notifications. Some articles just have horrible opinions and facts that everyone already knows, but they use them for clicks. It's just ridiculous.

For example, today I found an article talking about how no one knows Goku's real name. They even put in parenthesis (& It's not Karkarot). I clicked on the article expecting to read something new and interesting, like maybe Goku was mixed up with a kid named Kakarot on accident or something. But no, it's just the same old $#*! about Goku being based on and named after Sun Wukong, which is something EVERY fan knows. And I can guarantee you they didn't even figure this out themselves. It probably only took them 20 seconds of research for an article that a lot of Dragon Ball fans will probably fall for. The person who wrote it will probably make some bank, which is actually the $#*!ing worst. I hate it so $#*!ing much.

Overall, Screenrant is not a good website. They may pay their writers, but the content they produce is just not worth it. They need to step up their game and start producing quality content that people actually want to read. Until then, I won't be visiting their website again.

ScreenRant used to be pretty decent, but nowadays it's not really worth the time. A lot of the articles are just saying things like "this character is bad" or "this movie is problematic". It's like they're trying to be controversial just to get clicks.

I've seen a lot of people on Reddit complaining about the quality of ScreenRant's articles too. They use rumors and fan theories that aren't even confirmed to write their articles. They even write about how some actors are rude at conventions, but they don't even name who said it. It's kind of hypocritical that they talk about being offended by things, but then they go and attack people without any real evidence.

Honestly, some of their articles sound like something a teenage girl would write on social media. They need to step up their game and actually provide valid criticism instead of just trying to stir up drama. It would be great if they could take a step back and re-evaluate their standards.

Screenrant is a website that I have mixed feelings about. Sometimes they're pretty cool, but other times they're just a bunch of jerks. For example, they ranked Street Fighter II V as the best Street Fighter movie or TV show, which is just ridiculous. I mean, come on, that show was terrible! And they didn't even explain why they thought it was the best.

On the other hand, they do have some good content. I really like their articles about Batman Arkham, even though I think the games have some flaws. Screenrant seems to think that Batman Arkham is the best Batman game ever made, and while I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see why they would think that. It's a really good game, even if it's not perfect.

But then they go and do something stupid like their (Almost) Every Batman Video Game Ranked list. They said that the Game Boy and Genesis versions of Batman The Video Game were even less faithful to the movie than the NES game, which is just not true. Those versions were actually much more movie-accurate than the NES version, which took a lot of creative liberties. It's like they didn't even do their research!

Overall, I have to say that Screenrant is a pretty decent website. They have some good articles and some bad ones, but that's to be expected. I just wish they would be a little more careful with their rankings and their research. Sometimes they seem like they're just trying to stir up controversy for no reason. But hey, that's the internet for you!

I used to work for Screen Rant, and let me tell you, I've seen their decline firsthand. As a reader, you might think that the site has solid news coverage, with exclusive interviews with big name celebs like The Rock. But what ruins Screen Rant is that their news coverage just isn't popular enough to sustain them. So, in the last few years, they've turned to doing listicles to boost their clicks. And, to their credit, the plan was successful. But the problem is that the listicles have now become the focus of the site, and the news has taken a backseat.

As someone who wrote for them, I can tell you that the editors don't care what the readers think. They advised us writers on numerous occasions to just not read the comments so we wouldn't have to see negative feedback. If you criticize them, the editors dismiss you as a baseless hater.

Screen Rant has continued to struggle even with their listicles, so they've slowly ramped up the workload for the writers, and delved into sleazier topics to get attention. It's not uncommon to now see articles about sexualized superheroes, celebrity drug scandals, and other tabloid quality writing. It doesn't even pay well anymore since they have repeatedly slashed the pay for writers. At this point, I'm glad I'm gone from there because the whole vibe behind the scenes is that Screen Rant is a sinking ship.

There are so many better news sites out there, so support them instead. Don't give your attention to Screen Rant now that they have devolved into shameless clickbait. They are unprofessional and not worth your time.

Screen Rant has been a go-to source for news and reviews for quite some time. However, it seems that since Vic sold the site, it has become nothing more than click-bait garbage. The writers seem to think that throwaway sentences from impromptu interviews count as news, and they have been called out for making mountains out of molehills. Recently, James Gunn criticized them for misrepresenting a quote of his about Guardians of the Galaxy 2. The "journalist" in question wrote an article with a shocking headline, ultimately betraying the trust of the filmmaker, a filmmaker that Screen Rant's editors claim to enjoy.

Even the lead editor of the last 7+ years recently left the company. Could it be that the new owners are more interested in clicks than quality? That would be a shame because it used to be the opposite. Now, Screen Rant pumps out crap like opinion lists and quizzes. The occasional movie review slips through, but usually, their reviews are out of touch. For example, when Iron Fist was released on Netflix, Screen Rant easily put out more than ten articles on why Iron Fist was so bad and no one liked it, even though their comments section was full of readers who claimed they DID, in fact, like Iron Fist.

Sadly, the truth about Screen Rant lies in their comments section, as long as you are allowed to post. After calling out perhaps one too many writers/editors for wrong facts or misrepresentation, my comments are automatically marked as spam. There's no spam, I'm not pasting links or soliciting business. I'm merely sharing my opinion and knowledge. The old Screen Rant loved their fanbase interaction, but now it's some sort of totalitarian regime.

So, I bid farewell to Screen Rant. Good luck with the clicks. It's a shame that a once-great source of news and reviews has become nothing more than click-bait garbage. Hopefully, they will realize the error of their ways and return to their roots of quality journalism. Until then, I'll be looking elsewhere for my movie news and reviews.

I have recently come across ScreenRant, a website that offers a variety of articles and reviews on movies, TV shows, and other entertainment topics. I was particularly interested in their coverage of the 90 Day Fianc? franchise, which is one of my guilty pleasures. However, I must say that I was disappointed with the quality of the articles.

To put it bluntly, the writing is atrocious. It is riddled with grammatical errors, misspellings, and awkward phrasing that would make any English teacher cringe. It is clear that the writers did not bother to proofread their work or even use basic grammar and spell-check tools. As a result, the articles are difficult to read and comprehend.

Moreover, the content of the articles is not original or insightful. It seems that the writers simply browse Reddit forums and other social media platforms to gather fan opinions and then repackage them as their own. There is no attempt to provide any analysis or commentary on the show or its characters. It is just a collection of random thoughts and opinions that anyone could find on the internet.

One of the writers, in particular, stands out for her repetitive use of the word "dragging" to describe fan criticism of a cast member or event. It is so overused that it becomes annoying and distracting. It is as if she has no other vocabulary to express her thoughts. It is a shame that ScreenRant allows such poor writing to be published on their website.

In conclusion, while I enjoy watching the 90 Day Fianc? franchise, I cannot recommend ScreenRant's coverage of it. The articles are poorly written, unoriginal, and lack any real substance. If you are looking for insightful and engaging commentary on the show, you will have to look elsewhere.

ScreenRant is a website that claims to publish a lot of articles every day. But who can write 4-5 articles in a single day? It seems impossible, even if the writing is not that great and the articles are less than 1000 words. What is going on here? Are these writers superhuman or something? It seems like anyone can write like a madman these days, even if they have no talent or skill. They just write whatever they want, even if it's a stupid opinion piece on a ridiculous topic. And they get paid for it too! It's crazy!

But do these writers do anything else besides write crappy blogs? Probably not. They just churn out article after article, without taking the time to write something decent. It's like they don't care about quality or accuracy. They just want to get paid for their work, even if it's not very good. And that's not fair to the readers or to the people who actually write good articles.

So what's the deal with ScreenRant? Are these writers fake or are they just faking their writing in some way? It's hard to say for sure, but it's possible that they are ripping off other people's articles and passing them off as their own. Or maybe they are "hiring" other writers and using their material without giving them credit. Either way, it's not very honest or ethical.

And what about the quality of the articles themselves? Are they any good? Well, based on what I've seen, most of them are pretty bad. They are poorly written, poorly researched, and poorly edited. They are full of errors, typos, and grammatical mistakes. And they are often just plain boring or stupid.

So what's the point of reading ScreenRant? Honestly, I'm not sure. If you want to waste your time reading poorly written articles on stupid topics, then go ahead. But if you want to read something that is actually interesting and informative, then look elsewhere. There are plenty of other websites out there that publish high-quality content on a wide range of topics.

In conclusion, ScreenRant is a waste of time and energy. It's full of poorly written articles on stupid topics, and it's not worth your time or attention. If you want to read something that is actually worth your time, then look elsewhere. Don't believe the hype, and don't waste your time on this garbage.

ScreenRant is a website that covers all things related to movies, TV shows, and video games. While some may criticize the site for its use of clickbait headlines, there is no denying that it is a great source of entertainment news and reviews.

One of the things that sets ScreenRant apart from other entertainment websites is its in-depth analysis of popular franchises. Whether it's breaking down the latest Marvel movie or speculating about the next season of Game of Thrones, ScreenRant always has something interesting to say.

Another great feature of ScreenRant is its user-friendly layout. The site is easy to navigate and the articles are well-organized, making it simple to find the content you're looking for. Plus, the site is updated frequently, so there is always something new to read.

Of course, like any website, ScreenRant is not without its flaws. Some of the articles can be a bit sensationalized, and there are occasional spelling and grammar errors. However, these issues are relatively minor and do not detract from the overall quality of the site.

Overall, if you're a fan of movies, TV shows, or video games, ScreenRant is definitely worth checking out. While it may not be perfect, it is a great source of entertainment news and reviews, and its in-depth analysis of popular franchises is sure to keep you engaged.

connection, we got a glimpse of Thanos' minions, the Black Order. But it's not a hint that you missed, it's just a little Easter egg for the fans who are paying attention. Verdict: Not a brilliant hint, but a nice little nod to the comic book fans.

12) The Collector's Collection - Okay, this one's just stupid. ScreenRant claims that the Collector's collection contains a lot of Easter eggs and hints towards Thanos. But if you're paying attention, you'll notice that the Collector is just a collector. He collects things. He's not working for Thanos, he's just trying to get his hands on the Infinity Stones. Verdict: Not a hint, not brilliant, just a collection of things.

11) The Orb's Power - This one's actually a decent hint. The Orb, which contains the Power Stone, is said to be too powerful for any one person to handle. And yet, Star-Lord is able to hold it for a short amount of time. This hints at his half-celestial heritage, which is later revealed in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards Star-Lord's powers. Verdict: Decent hint, but not related to Thanos.

10) The Tesseract - This one's just ridiculous. ScreenRant claims that the Tesseract, which contains the Space Stone, is a hint towards Thanos because it's blue and Thanos is purple. What? That's not a hint, that's just a color comparison. Verdict: Not a hint, not brilliant, just a color comparison.

9) The Scepter - This one's a little better. The Scepter, which contains the Mind Stone, is used by Loki to control people's minds. This hints at the power of the Infinity Stones and their ability to control people. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards the power of the Stones. Verdict: Decent hint, but not related to Thanos.

8) The Aether - This one's actually a good hint. The Aether, which contains the Reality Stone, is said to be a weapon that can destroy the universe. This hints at the power of the Infinity Stones and their ability to destroy everything. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards the power of the Stones. Verdict: Good hint, but not related to Thanos.

7) The Eye of Agamotto - This one's a little better. The Eye of Agamotto, which contains the Time Stone, is used by Doctor Strange to manipulate time. This hints at the power of the Infinity Stones and their ability to manipulate time. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards the power of the Stones. Verdict: Decent hint, but not related to Thanos.

6) The Guardians' Origins - This one's just stupid. ScreenRant claims that the origins of the Guardians of the Galaxy are a hint towards Thanos because they all have a connection to him. But that's not a hint, that's just a connection. Verdict: Not a hint, not brilliant, just a connection.

5) The Vision - This one's actually a good hint. The Vision, who is created by Ultron using the Mind Stone, is said to be a being that can wield the power of the Stones. This hints at the power of the Infinity Stones and their ability to be wielded by someone. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards the power of the Stones. Verdict: Good hint, but not related to Thanos.

4) The Collector's Speech - This one's just ridiculous. ScreenRant claims that the Collector's speech about the Infinity Stones is a hint towards Thanos because he's the one who wants them. But that's not a hint, that's just common knowledge. Verdict: Not a hint, not brilliant, just common knowledge.

3) The Infinity Gauntlet - This one's actually a good hint. The Infinity Gauntlet, which is seen in the background of Thor's first movie, hints at the power of the Infinity Stones and their ability to be wielded by someone. But it's not a hint towards Thanos, it's just a hint towards the power of the Stones. Verdict: Good hint, but not related to Thanos.

2) The Snap - This one's actually a great hint. The Snap, which is the result of Thanos using the Infinity Stones to wipe out half of all life in the universe, is a major hint towards his power and his motivation. But it's not a hint that you missed, it's a major plot point in Avengers: Infinity War. Verdict: Great hint, but not something you missed.

1) The Mid-Credits Scene - This one's actually a great hint. The mid-credits scene of The Avengers, which introduces Thanos, is a major hint towards his power and his motivation. But it's not a hint that you missed, it's a major plot point in the MCU. Verdict: Great hint, but not something you missed.

In conclusion, ScreenRant's article is a waste of time. Most of the "hints" are not related to Thanos, and the ones that are related are not something you missed. The MCU is a great shared Universe, and it's easy to pick up on context clues. Don't waste your time on articles like this, and just enjoy the movies for what they are.

Screen Rant is a website that I have to visit frequently for my film class. I have noticed that they often make some bold statements that are meant to demonize or distance a particular group in favor of a political or social movement. Recently, they did this with the newest Pokemon games, where they tried to make it seem like the games were not accepting enough of the LGBTQ+ community. However, they also had an article praising the same games for their LGBTQ+ representation. This kind of contradiction is confusing and frustrating for readers like me.

I believe that Screen Rant should focus on providing unbiased and informative content about games, movies, and other forms of entertainment. Instead, they seem to be more interested in turning everything into a political or social movement. This approach is divisive and unnecessary. As readers, we just want to enjoy and learn about the entertainment we love without any political or social agenda being forced upon us.

It is important for websites like Screen Rant to understand that their readers come from all walks of life and have different beliefs and opinions. By intentionally demonizing or distancing a particular group, they risk alienating a large portion of their audience. This is not a good business strategy and can lead to a decline in readership.

In conclusion, while Screen Rant does provide some interesting content, their tendency to turn everything into a political or social movement is frustrating and unnecessary. I hope that they will focus more on providing unbiased and informative content in the future.

ScreenRant is a website that has been around for quite some time now. They cover a variety of topics, including movies, TV shows, and video games. Recently, they wrote an article about how Carol Danvers needs to "take a lesson" from the men in the MCU. This article has caused quite a stir among fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Now, I'm not saying that the person who wrote the article hates women, but it does seem like they were trying to stir up some drama. It's sad to see that a website with millions of followers would resort to such tactics just to get some attention. It's almost like they're trying to create controversy out of a controversial topic (Captain Marvel/Brie Larson).

I think ScreenRant needs to take a hint and realize that they don't need to create drama to get people to read their articles. They have a large following already, and they should focus on creating quality content instead of trying to stir up controversy. If they continue down this path, they may end up losing some of their followers.

In conclusion, ScreenRant needs to step up their game and focus on creating quality content. They don't need to create drama to get people to read their articles. Fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe deserve better than that.

ScreenRant is a company that I recently had the displeasure of working for. I must say, their work culture is just plain awful. The managers and editors completely ignore the staff of writers. It's like they don't even exist. I don't see how anyone can run a business the way they do. Seriously, do you know what happens when you ignore people? They go away and find work somewhere else.

To make matters worse, they pay out one of the lowest rates in the industry. It's insulting, really. The editors do nothing but cause problems. When you do manage to get one to reply to you, they are always nothing but nasty, rude, and manipulative. It's like they enjoy making their writers feel small and insignificant.

If you are thinking about working for this company, I urge you to reconsider. Start looking for other work the moment they onboard you so you can get the heck out of there. The work environment and culture is like having to swim around in a vat of toxicity. It's not worth the stress and frustration.

Overall, I would not recommend ScreenRant to anyone. Their work culture is toxic, their pay is insulting, and their editors are downright nasty. Save yourself the trouble and look elsewhere for employment.

ScreenRant is a website that provides a variety of articles on movies, TV shows, and video games. However, as a former freelance writer for the website, I can say that they do not pay their writers. They dangle the promise of payment in front of you, but they never communicate how they will pay you. Even during the training course, writers were left in the dark about how they would receive their payment. When writers tried to reach out to management about their pay, they were fired.

The workload for writers is overwhelming. They are expected to do the work of a publisher, editor, and writer, which leads to low-quality articles. The so-called "editors" do not edit the articles, leaving all the work up to the writers.

It's important to remember that the articles on ScreenRant are written by writers who were scammed into doing it for free. The website takes advantage of their writers and does not communicate clearly about payment. As a result, the quality of the articles suffers.

ScreenRant is a website that is all about the world of comics and movies. It is a place where fans of Marvel and DC can come together to read about the latest news and gossip. The site is known for its negative reviews of DC comics, which generate a lot of clicks from Marvel fans and random readers. However, Marvel fans are the only ones who seem to be interested in the negative reviews of their favorite comics. DC fans, on the other hand, are not interested in reading about the negative aspects of their favorite comics.

The site is all about generating clicks and making money. The writers know that negative reviews of DC comics will generate more clicks than positive reviews. Therefore, they focus on the negative aspects of DC comics and movies. They do this to guarantee their internet cash. The site is a fanboy Marvel site that proliferates any fake news and speculation only for the clickbait sake. The writers know that if they can generate enough negative buzz for no Marvel Studios productions, they will stay relevant and get more clicks.

The site is not interested in peace and complete satisfaction for all the productions that come with us. They are only interested in generating clicks and making money. If no conflicts come around, they will create conflicts just for the sake of generating clicks. The site is all about staying relevant and making money. If you are a fan of Marvel comics, then this site is for you. However, if you are a fan of DC comics, then you might want to look elsewhere for your news and gossip.

ScreenRant is a website that covers movies and TV shows, but I gotta say, it's not always the best experience. Sometimes, I feel like the writers don't even watch the content they're writing about. It's like they just skim through it and then write an article based on what they think happened.

One thing that really bothers me is when they write articles like "10 Things About______ That Just Don't Make Sense." I mean, come on, it's not that hard to find ten things that don't make sense in anything. But the points they make are often such a stretch that it's hard to take them seriously. I mean, I'm all for analyzing movies and TV shows, but sometimes it feels like they're just trying to find something to complain about.

I remember when ScreenRant used to be really good quality. The articles were well-written and insightful. But now, it feels like they're just churning out content for the sake of it. It's like they're more concerned with quantity than quality.

Honestly, it's kind of frustrating. I want to read articles that are well-researched and thought-provoking. But instead, I get articles that are full of errors and inconsistencies. It's like they don't even proofread their work before publishing it.

All that being said, I still visit ScreenRant from time to time. There are still some good articles on there, and I do appreciate the effort that goes into creating content. But I just wish they would put more effort into making sure their articles are accurate and well-written.

I gotta say, ScreenRant is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, they've got some pretty interesting articles about movies and TV shows that I'm into. But on the other hand, every time I click on one of those articles, I feel like I'm waiting for an eternity for it to load. I mean, come on, ScreenRant, do you really need that many ads on your site? It's like they're trying to make me lose my mind before I even get to the actual content.

And when I do finally get to the content, it's not always what I was hoping for. I've read some articles that were clearly written by someone who hasn't even watched the thing they're writing about. They'll make these big claims about plot holes or character motivations that are just plain wrong. It's like they're trying to stir up controversy for clicks, instead of actually engaging with the material in a thoughtful way.

And don't even get me started on the fan theories. Look, I love a good fan theory as much as the next person, but ScreenRant takes it to a whole new level. They'll treat these wild, out-there theories as if they're actual canon, and it's just... frustrating. I want to read about the actual story, not someone's fanfiction.

All that being said, I do still find myself coming back to ScreenRant from time to time. They've got a lot of content, and sometimes they do manage to hit the mark with their analysis. But overall, I wish they would focus more on accuracy and less on clickbait.

Screenrant.com is a website that has some good content, but overall, I find myself very frustrated with it. Some articles have spoiled the fate of certain characters without any warning, which is very unprofessional and certainly annoying. It's like they don't care about the readers who haven't seen the movie or TV show yet.

On a more personal note, I was just looking at a list for the best Power Rangers, and I was disappointed to see that my favorite Ranger and childhood hero, Rocky, was constantly belittled by whoever was making the list. Rocky was the very first Hispanic Power Ranger and the second Red Ranger. He was charismatic, funny, humble, a great friend, and a very talented martial artist. He was an excellent role model for children, and he definitely deserves more respect than what they have given him.

I wish I could give my complaints on their website, but there's no comments section, so this will have to do. I hope they take this feedback seriously and improve their content. It's important to respect the characters and the fans who love them.

Whenever I finish watching a movie, TV show, or playing a video game, I always have an opinion on it. That's why I like to read or listen to other people's opinions on the same material. It helps me understand it better and sometimes even appreciate it more. That's why I sometimes click on screenrant articles when they get recommended to me. However, every time I do, I'm left feeling disappointed.

It's abundantly clear that the writers at screenrant haven't even watched the show or played the game they're writing about. If they're praising something, it's extremely lukewarm, and if they're criticizing something, it's based on a Wikipedia summary. It's frustrating to read articles that don't have any substance or depth to them. As far as I can tell, this isn't the writers' fault. They're given unreasonable deadlines, and it's the company's job to vet their writers anyway.

If you're someone whose mood can be affected by infuriating articles, I suggest you do yourself a favor and block this site. There are so many better options out there if you're looking for a place with "fun" reviews. Don't waste your time on screenrant.

In conclusion, screenrant is not a reliable source for reviews. The articles lack substance and depth, and it's clear that the writers haven't even watched the material they're writing about. If you're looking for a place to read reviews, there are much better options out there.

I read some reviews about ScreenRant and I have to say, I agree with the negative comments. However, I wanted to share my personal experience with the website. I applied to work there as a guide writer, hoping to make some extra money doing what I love - writing about movies and TV shows.

The application process was grueling. It took me six hours to complete, and I had to answer a lot of questions about my writing experience and provide writing samples. But the worst part was the section where they asked me to pitch story ideas for the website. It felt like they were just farming ideas from applicants, without any intention of actually hiring them.

And when I finally got a response, it was a quick rejection with no feedback. I was disappointed, but not surprised. What really bothered me was the pay rate - $21 for a feature article. That's almost non-existent, considering the amount of time and effort it takes to write a quality piece.

After looking more closely at the website, I realized that ScreenRant is all about clickbait. They want writers who will churn out articles that will generate clicks and ad revenue, not writers who are passionate about their craft. It's a shame, really, because there are so many talented writers out there who could contribute so much more to the website.

In conclusion, I would advise anyone considering working for ScreenRant to steer clear. The hiring practices are shady, the pay is insulting, and the content is mediocre at best. There are better opportunities out there for writers who want to make a living doing what they love.