Menu
CB Airlines and Air Travel Review of SyberVision and Blackstone Nutrition
SyberVision and Blackstone Nutrition

SyberVision and Blackstone Nutrition review: I feel SyberVision is scamming people. 4

H
Author of the review
1:52 am EDT
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

Garrett DeVore and his family partners are making millions of dollars a month on their worldwide scams. They have setup hundreds of propaganda websites making outrageous, unsubstantiated claims about their products in the area of losing weight fast, curing acne, removing wrinkles, sexual enhancement, anti aging serum, muscle building, sleeping pills, pain relief, mood enhancement, kidney stones, vision enhancement, and bone joint treatment. They say their review sites are independent and unbiased, but they always rate their own products as the best #1 to buy and explain why the competition is not as good. It is not disclosed to the reader that their review sites are owned and operated by the same company. In other words, the unsuspected consumer who is suffering from varies physical problems read these so called “independent” review sites and then buy the products not knowing they are the same people, Garrett DeVore and his family members.

Law suite has been filed in Federal District Court against Utah businessmen Steve A. DeVore, owner of SyberVision, and Garrett DeVore, owner of Blackstone Nutrition.
DeVore Family based in Utah Operating Multi Million Dollar Internet Scams Worldwide!

Bogus Web Sites Defame Competitors, Says Complaint Against Utah-Based Firms
MANHATTAN (CN) - SyberVision and Blackstone Nutrition conspire to deceive consumers through Web sites that post bogus "product reviews" that defame competitors and violate trademarks, which the defendants hijacked by buying as Google key words, USA Herbals claims in Federal Court.
USA Herbals and its affiliate, Curb Your Carvings, accuse the Orem, Utah-based companies and their owners and operators, Steven and Garrett DeVore, of "fraudulent Internet marketing".
"Defendants maintain a series of Web sites purporting to provide 'product reviews' to consumers, " the complaint states. "The defendants' Web site claim to contain unbiased and helpful consumer information. However, the 'reviews' are fake and the Web sites are nothing more than a marketing scheme for defendants' competing products, which they promote on the sites. The defendants recently targeted one of CYC's successful products by purchasing the brand name as a 'key word' on search engines such as Google. When a consumer enters CYC's product name as a search term, the defendants' Web site purportedly 'reviewing' the product is displayed as a search result, along with CYC's product name and inflammatory language like 'warning' and 'scam' prominently displayed in the search result. ... The defendants instead divert consumers using CYC's proprietary content to their competing products with lies and misinformation. As a result, defendants derive profit by deceiving unsuspecting consumers at the expense of both the consumers and CYC in violation of federal trademark and copyright laws and various other state laws."
Plaintiffs demand an injunction and damages for, among other things, defamation, conspiracy, trademark and copyright violations, unfair competition, deceptive trade and tortious interference. They are represented by David Valicenti with Cain Hibbard Myers of Pittsfield, Mass.

4 comments
S
S
SyberVision
Orem, US
May 26, 2015 6:25 pm EDT

SyberVision has nothing to do with Garrett DeVore. Steve devore was dismissed from the suit when the court learned he had been wrongly named as a defendant. The suit was then dismissed altogether without merit because claims were brought by competitor of Garrett (a high school sophomore at the time) in an attempt to intimidate him because he refused to remove a review about the competitors unethical auto charge program. Steve was named as a defendant because he and Garrett shared the same home address (along with Garret's mom and his six siblings.

J
J
jlh-momof3
, US
Jul 12, 2012 10:39 am EDT

I looked up phenphedrine on many different websites, including the official phenphedrine website and vitamins.net. The ingredients for phenphedrine were totally different on these 2 websites. Therefore, I called them both. It turned out they were represented by the same customer service, and the person could not give me an answer as to why the product had different ingredients. It was, however, ironic that the ingredients on vitamins.net were much healthier. The telephone # I called for vitamins.net was [protected], and the telephone # for phenphedrine.com was [protected]. Although, I suspect after my phone calls and questions, they may change the ingredients or phone number entirly. I also inquired about the name who was behind vitamins.net and phenphedrine.com, and the customer service representative declined to give me any information. I won't disclose that person's name because they were very pleasant, however I do have the name written down. I am very dissapointed to come upon this information, because I was interested in purchasing phenphedrine, which, it turns out, may be one of the products by which this lawsuit is based upon. I guess it really does pay to do your research.

G
G
Griffin1979
Carlsbad, US
Feb 03, 2011 5:40 pm EST

There is no scam here. Sybervision reviews and recommends products. Just like UltimateFatBurner is an affiliate of iSatori's lean system 7, sybervision seems to be an affiliate of every supplement company out there. they have their opinions and allow readers to share theirs. i am smart enough to know that the majority of ''reviews'' are marketing plants, even amazon does it. It is funny when websites bash on competitors sites for being affiliates yet do the same thing. Just like UltimateFatBurner who spews false information about everyone and their grandma.

S
S
sherry regan
Merritt Island, US
Feb 24, 2009 6:59 pm EST

THEY KEEP CHARGING MY ACCOUNT EVEN THOUGH I HAVE CANCELLED.