What employer appeases an employee who deliberately diminished the company brand?
The NFL, 49ers are permitting an employee to insult the nation, the vast majority of the fans and the great men and woman who defend our communities from Anarchy in the streets.
If the money acquired by The corporation, As a result of Kappernick's disloyalty, is greater than the animus engender then the corporate mission needs to be reassessed by its patriotic leadership, however if the money is the driving force then a campaign by fans to refrain from participating in attending, viewing, purchasing souvenirs is the response to corporate acquiescence to employee sabotage of positive image.
One athlete who uses the marketing venue, owned and controlled by the corporation I, for his or her personal political platform is stealing the time and his representation of the brand he does not own or control, unless that was provided in his contract.
Someone who steals a NFL copyrighted broadcast or sells products with a label that is owned by the NFL would face prosecution and legal civil penalties for infringement.
Kappernick is a thief of the NFL and 49ers exclusive rights to the NFL games and the presentation.by engaging in political protest at those games he is stealing, among many other despicable acts of anti American, disrespect.
I am personally unable to effect the course of the NFL in this matter, but expressing my disdain and comtemp of both the employee and the corporate entity using the resources of NFL to further a political and treasoness agenda by stealing without permission. .
In the private sector, an employee who engages in thief of corporate property in breach oh his contract is dismissed
What action are you taking NFL 49ers?