Sky Sports
reviews and complaints

I am disgusted and appalled that you are putting adverts in the middle of play!

its just awful when the game is so good and you then run more than normal adverts while game is in play! play them in half time, before and after.

Absolutely terrible we pay for a service to watch games not adverts ! I get that you get massive amounts of money for these but NEVER EVER EVER should they interrupt transmission of the game!

Again we are forced to listen to the 100% of twaddle from jamie carragher. When are you going to do something about removing this [censored] from our football matches. Agin I haver to mute the tv because i'm sick of listening to that liverpudlian [censored] load of uselees chat & interuption during a live game. He is an ex footballer who knows sweet f a about the game as it should be played today. Get him off our screen & live match commetaries. B a commentator is all we need to enjoy a game of live football not these [censored] like carragher etc etc. Lets get to watch football with the 1 main commentator who talks about the game as it happens & not a load of useless rubish like carragher rabbits on about. Get rid now so we can get back to unmuting the sound & enjoy a live game of football again like how it used to be before the likes of kamie carragher etc etc. Get you act together sky sports. We are the license payers & want to enjoy what we are paying for. Di it now! Pleeeeeeease.

Am enjoying the Ashes coverage. On the whole excellent.
But, please, speak with the British commentators. Their, lazy, in my opinion, continuous omissions of the letter T and double T.
I understand that regional dialects are de rigour but please ask them to insert them please.
Many thanks for your attention to this matter.
Looking forward to hearing from you.

Morning,

Just to let you know that your National League North table on Sky Sports News has a small error on it. This season only two teams will be relegated and not three, which is where your dotted line is.
This is to allow four teams to come up so next year there will be twenty four teams in it.
If you could amend that then it would make this Kettering Town fan a little bit happier!
Thanks
Steve

The pre and especially post-match analysis was so one sided anyone who had not seen the game would not have known who Man Utd were playing for the first 19 minutes post match.

Then the cosy old boys club of Gary Neville and co focused not on a serious, unbiased and professional analysis of the ebb and flow of the game e.g. tactical changes second half for Wolves, dangerous foul on Jota by James, Jimenez hitting the post, Patricio's wonderful save or Neves great goal. I have been a Sky Sports subscriber for years and it has always been biased towards the uber rich teams of the last 25+ years, however, the loss of La Liga games, Premiere League games to BT and other providers and the Champions League is disappointing. Thsi has not been reflected in a reduction in subscription to this service.

Wolves and their Manager post-match - pure class
Sky and their cosy kiddies boys club - pure grimace

I am sick to death of listening to Gary Neville's continued racism directed at Paul Pogba, why are you sky, a major broadcaster allowing him to get away with his clear dislike/ bias against Paul Pogba, calling him 'selfish' before getting the facts. Pogba is in my view a professional man simply plying his trade? he deserves protection.

Gary directs all his criticisms towards Paul, wrong and unfair.
Listening to him you'd think it was Paul v Wolves.
This is 2019 sky, please kick racism out of your studio's and rein him in.
He goes too far. He isn't commentating, he's inciting hate.
In-fact the entire studio commentary was unbalanced and deeply disturbing.

Deeply unhappy viewer.

As a regular sky sport watcher and avid Wolves fan. I am both disappointed and disgusted with the amount of post match conversation about Manchester Utd. I honestly think that Man Utd played against Man Utd? I Know Man Utd missed a penalty which could have made a difference but at one point Gary Nevile talked like a fan rather than being partisan about the game in question.
Can we have equal time spent on both teams in future or maybe change the so called pundits.
Kind regards
Sean Bridge

Why on Earth do us license payers have to put up with listening to that [censored] Jamie Carragher. He is an X footballer for christs sake & his playing days are long over. We don't need these hangers on in todays football no do we need all this Analysis [censored]. Football clubs have managers to analyse the game their players have played in & try to sort out where they went wrong or where to improve on their next game. Also what's this Front foot [censored] they talk about. NO such thing, it's know as ATTACKING (that's kicking the ball forward as quickly & as accurately as possible in trying to score goals for your side. Also there is no such thing as Back foot either, that's knows as DEFENDING (getting as many players back to DEFEND as quickly as possible in order to try & stop the opposition from scoring goals. Enough said. So, sky, get rid of Jamie Carragher & all the other hangers on that have had their day & let a Commentator do his/her job talking about the game as it happens without all the interruption from [censored] like Carragher etc etc. Then perhaps i will be able to watch a football game without my remote in permanent MUTE so as not to listen to [censored] like Carragher. Get it sorted Sky or it's BBC forever for me & the other millions out there who haven't got the bottle to speak up like i have done. Perhaps they'll read this & act the same way i have. Get it sorted Sky, regards, Kenny Shaw

Regarding the Sheffield Utd vs Crystal Palace game.

Your commentary of the game was shockingly bias against Crystal Palace.

Crystal Palace didn't play well and as a Palace fan I recognise this, but from the off Alan Smith used constant negative language towards Palace and positive for Utd.

When Palace had good spells he did his best to spin it for Utd.

Please ask him to be impartial and professional.

Not Sky Sports greatest hour

Why does Sky Premier football employ Gary Neville to comment on premier matches? He never remains neutral, shows bias particularly when Manchester sides are engaged and has clearly demonstrated this today during the coverage of Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur. If you want to use quality former players then find anyone better than this guy. He was one of the worst full backs I have ever seen and when playing for England it was often that goals scored against us came from the left wing which he was meant to protect. The guy was elevated way beyong his ablility and left to me he would have been lucky to have played in a Sunday Pub side league. Get rid of him and find someone who is impartial and genuinely understands the game of football.
Steve Slade
Melksham

I am astounded that David Gower's contract is not being renewed. Gower is a tremendous anchor and one of a number of great players that commentate on Sky. Kumar Sangakarra being the latest to join the team. The fact that Isa Guha has also joined the team makes things even worse. She witters on and on when less words would very much be a case of less is more.

Kaveh Solhekol tweeted that he 'hates Tories'. As it was Tory voters that helped build Sky into what it is today I would have thought you would have more respect for your customers. Solhekol clearly only cares about himself - what he said was deeply disrespectful and unprofessional. Someone offending such a large number of clients in any other business would be sacked. I expect him to be disciplined and Sky Sports to make an apology on air.

Why do TV cameras on Sky Sports football matches not follow the game?
So often, we miss what is going on when the ball is in play, since the camera is switched to one which is looking at a player who is nowhere near the ball, or to a manager, or to a linesman, or to the crowd. Why do this?
I have paid to watch a game of football, I don't want to watch an individual who isn't involved in the immediate action.

the new championship football highlights programme of 30 mins is ver poor.what happened to the one hour programme with a studio and presenters etc. no interviews with managers after game .its an insult to the thousands of supporters of championship teams and most of all sky sports watchers and suscribers.so dissapointed with sky sports as coverage of football is usually first class.dave a sheffield wednesday supporter.my email is david.[protected]@outlook.com

I have paid £8.99 for a day pass and the last 20 minutes coverage of the England v Wales rugby match is appalling. The image is unclear and ruins the ability to concentrate on the match.
I am not happy with the level of service you have provided and this is not worthy of the £8.99, nor does this bode well for future matches this month and your intended sponsorship and coverage in the future.

How disappointing that I tune in the watch Arsenal V Newcastle commentary but the team is made up of ex players known for there disliking of Arsenal and only talking about Liverpool ans Man city? How limited are sky sports to have the same pundits each week with such limited knowledge of each and every football team in the league. I think I'm going to Cancel my sky and get BT because they have a team that reflect each match...not happy

Why oh why is Sky Sports employing that irksone, incoherent, thick as a plank Clinton Morrison? Won NOTHING in football, worse than Merson in his use (or lack of) the English language and comes across as a complete [censored]. There are far better, well-versed former players Sky could employ, so why the company persist with Morrison is beyond me. I've turned off now, back to 5 Live, time to re-consider Sky subsription.

Good Afternoon,

As a sky customer for over 8 years I find it absolutely disgusting the amount of times Leeds United are shown live in sky sports. Just this season, they are on 3 times within 10 days. That's their first 3 games all live in sky when Yorkshire derbies like Sheffield Wednesday v Barnsley get overlooked. The league 1 team Bury are struggling for money and have had to postpone there EFL Cup game v Sheffield Wednesday, the tv money they would of got if Sky had chose to show it live could possibly have saved them but instead they have chosen Leeds, AGAIN!

As a football fan I don't believe it is fair to not only give this much air time to a single team, but also all the TV money that comes with being on Sky as much as they are, it simply isn't fair to the clubs that get overlooked week after week. There are smaller clubs in the championship alone that could really do with that money and as Leeds' spending over the last few transfer windows have proved, they do not need the money like those teams do.

I am sure I am not the first person to make this complaint as it is something I see on social media throughout the season.

I look forward to an explanation from Sky regarding this complaint.

Kind Regards,

John Whetton.

Why are you advertising with the premier league trophy without putting the champions colours on it, also do you have shares in Liverpool as you would think they won the premier league not city or is it just city the whole of sky don't like, they are one of the best teams in the world and all you do is put them down you never give them the credit with what they have achieved but big up Liverpool and others around them and Liverpool won a cup you don't televise and you wonder why people try not to pay for the football you show