Menu
CB Online Shopping Zazzle 1523 West Grab Creek Road, Dickson, TN, 37055, US
Zazzle company logo
Zazzle
reviews & complaints
Zazzle company logo

Zazzle

1523 West Grab Creek Road, Dickson, TN, 37055, US
Learn how the rating is calculated
1 complaint
File a complaint Write a review
Category
ComplaintsBoard
M
7:56 am EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Zazzle - ssi fraud & your tax dollars

geekgirlunlimited sells graphic designs at zazzle and pockets the income while your tax dollars pay for her to sit home all day on the computer. She collects SSI and is a self admitted mentally ill woman on numerous anti-depressant medications and various other drugs. She has stated online she takes a multitude of medications and often doesn't even get out of her nightgown.

While some of the designs are colorful, you may NOT generate an outside income while collecting SSI.

After recently finding out through a web site her SSI was being questioned and SSI was being alerted, she immediately added the phrase "All proceeds go to JRAS" to both her web site geekgirlunlimited and her page at zazzle.com.
A rep at JRAS has never received any donations from geekgirlunlimited.

She has several alias names. Shanda Hill, Shanda Ross, Shanda Reynolds, Shanda Maddox, Shanda Lancaster, Shanda Jofiel, Shanda Noneya.

SSI has been notified and Shanda Maddox/Lancaster/Hill/Ross/Reynolds is currently under investigation.

Read full review of Zazzle and 12 comments
View 0 more photos
Hide full review
12 comments
Add a comment
T
T
trishi holder
, US
Feb 10, 2021 3:01 am EST

I found your website because now this lady Diane patchen that was on this lawsuit has been collecting money for years on youtube for st Jude’s but refuses to show receipts she donated the money to them. She has gone dark and won’t get on her once popular show in the so cloaked drama community. She made a mistake by trying yo get members of crime community to come subscribe and now people are questioning her, I don’t know if she is a scammer or not. But people are very suspicious since she has been belligerent and threatening if you ask any questions.

D
D
Derrrrr
, US
Jan 30, 2012 9:50 pm EST
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

You are not too intelligent are you? Thanks for bumping this, blackwidow. I think you should heed your own advice about opening your mouth.

R
R
Recordkeeper
Auburn, US
Jan 30, 2012 9:31 pm EST
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Hahahahahaha! With that infamous 60-page post on PC, all she proved is that the dangerous person is her! Oh, and earned herself another lawsuit as well! Some people never learn that keeping your mouth shut is often the best option.

S
S
Shanda Lancaster
Dickson, US
Jan 27, 2012 6:28 pm EST
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

http://manthissitesucks.pissedconsumer.com/manthissitesucks-members-are-dangerous-20111209280283.html

S
S
Shanda Lancaster
Dickson, US
Sep 28, 2011 10:44 am EDT
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Libel.

V
V
V3456d
, US
Sep 02, 2011 8:04 pm EDT

Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
View as Table
Cases 1 - 20 of 135Subscribe
PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al
Filed: August 25, 2011 as 2:2011cv05388
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK
Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Court: Third Circuit > Pennsylvania > Eastern District Court
Type: Torts - Injury > Assault Libel & Slander

B
B
Banned Member
Palmer, US
Aug 31, 2011 7:19 am EDT
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Naw, she can't google anyone at this moment cause she is running through the hills of Tennessee!

O
O
Oweon
, US
Apr 04, 2020 5:30 am EDT
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Can someone please explain what’s the go with Diane Patchen & husband Robert Smik what’s their story to all this mess please 😀

L
L
Lazy Dazy
Williamsburg, US
Feb 18, 2021 7:10 pm EST
Replying to comment of Oweon

A lot of us are wondering the same thing! Looks like you were ahead of the game 👍🏻

M
M
Micki 121
, US
Feb 19, 2021 12:53 am EST
Replying to comment of Oweon

Diane"s Channel on yt.

H
H
howunfortunate4u
, US
Aug 31, 2011 6:06 am EDT

lady, ur busted. google urself lately?

Search Results

Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern ...
dockets.justia.com › ... › Torts - Injury - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court :: Justia ...
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings › Third Circuit › Pennsylvania - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Pennsylvania :: Justia ...
dockets.justia.com › ... › Third Circuit › Pennsylvania › Torts - Injury - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "John Does 1-19" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
1 day ago – Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "JOHN DOES (1-20)" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "J. H." :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "John 2 Doe" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "JOHN DOE" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
4 days ago – Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
Cases filed matching "FRANCIS" :: Justia Dockets & Filings
dockets.justia.com › Dockets & Filings - Cached
Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...
PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al
www.law360.com/cases/4e57bd15df270801ea000002 - Cached
5 days ago – PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al. You will be tracking all: ... Defendant. SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX ... Plaintiff. DIANE PATCHEN ...

C
C
C3ph45
, JO
Jun 18, 2011 9:35 pm EDT
Verified customer This comment was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

The information posted above is nothing more than libel comments posted by disgruntled individuals, who have an issue with Mrs. Lancaster on a personal level.

I can verify that Mrs. Lancaster does give money to charity because she sent me the receipt of the exact dollar amount I had paid to her, from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and was kind enough to even put it in my name.

On a more personal level, which is obvious when they attack her disability. Mrs. Lancaster doesn't even receive money from SSI. She is also in no way under investigation harassment and libel and will not be facing charges.

Another obvious point that this is personal, is the fact she is using the last name of her husband, but hasn't legally changed it. You don't have to legally change the name, you can assume the last name of your spouse without legally changing it.

Also why post skewed and personal information about the individual. There is no need to include the exact address of this individual, not to mention state she is not married. She has a loving husband, and beautiful children. I don't if shes considered married in the courts eyes, but she would be consider common law.

This report is nothing more than an attack towards an individual by others whom she provided a witness statement against. She is not being investigated, or being charged with harassment, and is in no way a liar.

Elevating the Voice of the Consumer

Empowering Real Complaints

At ComplaintsBoard, we understand the impact of genuine consumer grievances. Our platform is a dedicated space for authentic voices, where complaints, both positive and negative, are shared with honesty and transparency.

Dedicated to Validating Complaints

We are committed to ensuring the authenticity of every complaint. Our team uses rigorous verification methods to confirm that each complaint stems from a real customer experience, maintaining the integrity of our platform.

Encouraging Detailed Complaint Narratives

We value complaints accompanied by concrete evidence. Be it a photo, a detailed narrative, or additional documentation, such substantiation lends credibility to your complaint, aiding others in making informed decisions.

Balanced and Constructive Dialogue

ComplaintsBoard is more than a platform for airing grievances; it's a community where balanced dialogue is encouraged. We welcome complaints that not only point out issues but also recognize any positive interactions, promoting a fair and comprehensive perspective.

A Free and Impartial Platform for Complaints

Our unwavering commitment is to provide a free and unbiased platform for all complaints. Every complaint is given equal importance, ensuring your concerns are heard and respected, irrespective of their nature.