Victory Chrisian Fellowship review: false religion and using christianity to make money to rich people 24

We were victims by Every Nation or Victory Christian Fellowship.

It started with a pastor named Alfred Baltazar and Marc Constantino of Victory Metro East. Little did we know that they are Extortionists.  They followed us even in our homes. We were hacked (through their youth ministry) asking for our bank details, tried ransacking our homes, issued grave threats and even tried to abduct a couple in exchange for money.

Their fanatic members and self-proclaimed leaders are arrogant and lunatics.  They are connected to numerous crime syndicates, politicians and bogus organizations and authorities in the Philippines.

Stay away from this fake church!

Welcome Po kayong lahat sa Christ's Commission Fellowship o CCF. Ating ipanalangin sa Panginoon na Tayo ay patuloy na lumago sa pananampalatayang Kristiyano. 🙏🙏🙏

It's so funny that all the people who believes you thinks what you and their doingare Godly, and then you will say that this church is a cult which is of false news. 😂

Victory Pioneer pinalayas noong February 2019 sa Robinsons Pioneer at di rinenew ang contrata nila na magrent ng place doon kasi ang daming church members nagreklamo na pera pera lamang ang ministry... the church has changed place to Victory Pasig Estancia... and another church branch ng Victory Mandaluyong was established... maraming alumni ang Jesus Christ King of kings and Lord of lords Academy ang naging member dito at naging VG Leader... I am praying for them...kawawa sila wala na silang mapuntahang ibang church pero may kaunting VG Leader dito matino... Victory Makati okay okay pa ang kultura nila...nagkumpulan sa church branch ng Victory Makati si Pastor Dennis Sy at iba pa... ewan ko ang exact reason... but Pastor Neil Germo lost ECE graduate... naaawa ako sa kanya... scam na nga ang Board Exam at Civil Service Law sa Pilipinas because of corruption at kurap ang church namin... naaawa sa kanya... Miss Sheena Andarino Bautista the 7th HS Valedictorian ng JCKL Academy... 17 yrs old pa lang narecruit na sa kulto namin... binalaan ko sya sa pm... nagresign din sya as accounting staff ng VCF Fort...other alumni ng JCKL Academy at staff ng Victory Makati pinalipat ng VCF Fort... maybe to teach those corrupt church leaders sa VCF Fort...

Engr. Jeremiah Dollente
VCF Makati Church Member
6th High School Valedictorian of Jesus Christ King of kings and Lord of lords Academy
Cristianong Kabataang Filipino na Pag Asa ng Bansang Pilipinas

VCF is a fellowship clearly not with GOD. This fellowship is not after the truth in the Bible. Their teachings are based on their personal interpretations misleading others. Why? they teach and implement Tithes which is not a christian doctrine. Tithes is intended for the Israel only.
Hebrews 7:5 (KJV)
5 And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham:
This law is not in effect anymore in our time which we called Christian Era. We should follow the doctrines of Christ and not the old law of moises
Christ change the law - Hebrews 7:12 (KJV)
12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
Christ teaches us not tithes but according to our will.
2 Corinthians 9:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver.
This clearly show that vcf & other religious denominations that apply Tithes are fake! They are already written in the Bible. They are called in the Bible as greedy dogs. Pls read
Isaiah 56:11-12 King James Version (KJV)
11 Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter.

Hi pastor, allow me to share you these and please don't get me wrong as I only want to verbalize my feelings based on what i see in relation to the scriptures. Look, it seems we are always teaching material prosperity thus makes us a Prosperity church and most of all we taught things like manipulation by way of making all people bow down to us as leaders and also the doctrine of moses is taught which is not in the form of grace such as tithing as a command. remember that God fulfilled the law by nailing on the cross so we will live by grace as an adopted child of God and the law of circumcision, tithes, eating blood has set aside by Jesus and our salvation depends on faith alone to Jesus but the result is good works deriving from the fruits of the spirit. Every christian has a nature of desire to give but not under regret, compulsion or commands rather it comes from the generosity of the heart for Christ loves a cheerful giver. In short, we give as we choose based on our hearts desire and why are we teaching unscriptural phrases such as you will become a curse if you don't give money is or tithe is clear picture of a "Doctrinal Error" and God will curse us by way of teachng not in accordance to scriptures. God will not even spare if angels does that. What worries me is are we doing all these teaching out of Love for Jesus or simply out for survival in general? what if one day, when we meet Jesus, He will say to us AWAY YOU EVIL DOERS FOR YOU ARE A FALSE TEACHERS please dont get me wrong but this is my evaluation how our church contradicts the teaching of Christ. Yes we taught sound doctrine but it is mixed with added scriptures which Jesus has already nailed on the cross 2000 yrs ago like following the law of moses regarding tithes as well as the violation of our abuse of power teaching people to worship breakthroughs instead of seeking God despite of pain and suffering for Christ never promise happy ending on earth. I am scared of our teaching because what if we are already condemned in our quest of our belief which is not aligned with the truth that is found in the Grace of God and the Holy spirit. I wonder why you are nice but most pastor I observed is acting like a caretaker instead of a Shepherd. I am opening this up to you because you helped me before and I was greatful for that yet I feel concern about our faith as my eyes has now opened to the real teaching of the gospel. I am concern my friend about us going to either heaven or hell. Hope you understand.

victoryfort.org is the mother evil headquarters main in the world located in Taguig, Philippines and the name of the building is Every Nation!

victoryfort.org

I have been in vcf for a decade and graduated 2 years bible school called "enli" in vcf, their god is their stomach, they don't act as the shepherd of the flock but as a hired pastor wc is biblically known as the "caretaker" who allows he sheeps be eaten by wolves! we all know that there is no tithes highlighted in the new testament because it was part of the law of moses which jesus has paid once and for all and the tithes was given to the jewish people not to the christian like the pharisee whom jesus rebuke due to hypocrisy. every nation church or vcf has no check and balance for they choose their leader only if they are a "yes men" which means they are paid then they must abide the norms of the church instead the teachings of christ such as they preach scary thing if you don't pay or give tithes you will be a curse! which contradicts the teaching of jesus in john 10:10 for christ said he came to bring life to the fullest and abundant life then how can you be a curse curse is the man who gives tithes that is against his heart says paul for any1 who follow the law instead of grace is a curse! google it! the god of these victory pastors is money and we all know we cannot serve money and god. also when you give never do it out of obligation, compulsion, or regrets for god loves a cheerful giver and god never commanded as to give what more if tithes as this is not biblical as far as new testament law of grace is concern. tithes comes from the law of moses and the church in vcf uses it to scam its rich members and also to the poor. they are what the book of revelation called as the beast! going further, all pastors in victory are hired pastors and some are getting their livelihood iby scamming members to support them which is called "mpd".. I also notice many pastors are arrogant and you cannot approach them because only leaders can do it as they uses the leaders to escalate their evil to educate their members to give tithes so their god is money. members are not allowed to approach pastors but they advise the members to talk to their leaders and these happens in poor churches but to the rich members are all welcome to approach pastors! may the people open their eyes and may god destroys the evil works of this victory christian fellowship and known to the world as every nation ministry,

This church vcf has Multiple estafa case because they have deceit from the beginning saying and scaring people to give tithes or else they will be cursed in the very Eyes of God>>so the members were left with no choice but being fooled so why can we get back all the money we gave to this victory christian fellowship of every nation otherwise we can file ESTAFA against this church for fooling people about tithing.

What is Estafa in the Philippine Law anyway?

In the case of ROSITA SY vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, G.R. No. 183879, April 14, 2010 discussed the ways of committing the felony of estafa, thus:

"X x x.

The sole issue for resolution is whether Sy should be held liable for estafa, penalized under Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the Revised Penal Code (RPC).

Swindling or estafa is punishable under Article 315 of the RPC. There are three ways of committing estafa, viz.: (1) with unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence; (2) by means of false pretenses or fraudulent acts; or (3) through fraudulent means. The three ways of committing estafa may be reduced to two, i.e., (1) by means of abuse of confidence; or (2) by means of deceit.

The elements of estafa in general are the following: (a) that an accused defrauded another by abuse of confidence, or by means of deceit; and (b) that damage and prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation is caused the offended party or third person.

The act complained of in the instant case is penalized under Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the RPC, wherein estafa is committed by any person who shall defraud another by false pretenses or fraudulent acts executed prior to or simultaneously with the commission of the fraud. It is committed by using fictitious name, or by pretending to possess power, influence, qualifications, property, credit, agency, business or imaginary transactions, or by means of other similar deceits.

The elements of estafa by means of deceit are the following, viz.: (a) that there must be a false pretense or fraudulent representation as to his power, influence, qualifications, property, credit, agency, business or imaginary transactions; (b) that such false pretense or fraudulent representation was made or executed prior to or simultaneously with the commission of the fraud; (c) that the offended party relied on the false pretense, fraudulent act, or fraudulent means and was induced to part with his money or property; and (d) that, as a result thereof, the offended party suffered damage.

Nestor, In modern English, the term cult has come to usually refer to a social group defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or its common interest in a particular personality, object or goal. This sense of the term is controversial and it has divergent definitions in both popular culture and academia and it also has been an ongoing source of contention among scholars across several fields of study.[1][2] It is usually considered pejorative.

In the sociological classifications of religious movements, a cult is a social group with socially deviant or novel beliefs and practices, [3] although this is often unclear.[4][5][6] Other researchers present a less-organized picture of cults, saying that they arise spontaneously around novel beliefs and practices.[7] Groups said to be cults range in size from local groups with a few members to international organizations with millions.[8]

An older sense of the word cult—covered in a different article—is a set of religious devotional practices that are conventional within their culture and related to a particular figure, and often associated with a particular place. References to the "cult" of, for example, a particular Catholic saint, or the imperial cult of ancient Rome, use this sense of the word.

Beginning in the 1930s, cults became the object of sociological study in the context of the study of religious behavior.[9] From the 1940s the Christian countercult movement has opposed some sects and new religious movements, and it labelled them as cults for their "un-Christian" unorthodox beliefs. The secular anti-cult movement began in the 1970s and it opposed certain groups, often charging them with mind control and partly motivated in reaction to acts of violence committed by some of their members. Some of the claims and actions of the anti-cult movement have been disputed by scholars and by the news media, leading to further public controversy.

The term "new religious movement" refers to religions which have appeared since the mid-1800s. Many, but not all of them, have been considered to be cults. Sub-categories of cults include: Doomsday cults, personality cults, political cults, destructive cults, racist cults, polygamist cults, and terrorist cults. Various national governments have reacted to cult-related issues in different ways, and this has sometimes led to controversy.

English-speakers originally used the word "cult" not to describe a group of religionists, but to refer to the act of worship or to a religious ceremony. The English term originated in the early 17th century, borrowed via the French culte, from the Latin noun cultus (worship). The word ultimately derived from the Latin adjective cultus (inhabited, cultivated, worshipped), based on the verb colere (to care, to cultivate).[10][11]

While the literal original sense of the word in English remains in use, a derived sense of "excessive devotion" arose in the 19th century.[12] The terms cult and cultist came into use in medical literature in the United States in the 1930s for what would now be termed "faith healing", especially as practised in the US Holiness movement. This usage experienced a surge of popularity at the time, and extended to other forms of alternative medicine as well.[13]

Contents
1 Definition
2 New religious movements
3 Scholarly studies
4 Anti-cult movements
4.1 Christian countercult movement
4.2 Secular anti-cult movement
4.3 Reactions to the anti-cult movements
5 Subcategories
5.1 Destructive cults
5.2 Doomsday cults
5.3 Political cults
5.4 Polygamist cults
5.5 Racist cults
5.6 Terrorist cults
6 Governmental policies and actions
6.1 China
6.2 Russia
6.3 United States
6.4 Western Europe
7 See also
8 Footnotes
9 References
10 Bibliography
Definition
In the English-speaking world the word "cult" often carries derogatory connotations.[14] It has always been controversial because it is (in a pejorative sense) considered a subjective term, used as an ad hominem attack against groups with differing doctrines or practices.[15][16]

In the 1970s, with the rise of secular anti-cult movements, scholars (but not the general public) began abandoning the term "cult". According to The Oxford Handbook of Religious Movements, "by the end of the decade, the term 'new religions' would virtually replace 'cult' to describe all of those leftover groups that did not fit easily under the label of church or sect."[17]

Sociologist Amy Ryan has argued for the need to differentiate those groups that may be dangerous from groups that are more benign.[18] Ryan notes the sharp differences between definition from cult opponents, who tend to focus on negative characteristics, and those of sociologists, who aim to create definitions that are value-free. The movements themselves may have different definitions of religion as well.[19] George Chryssides also cites a need to develop better definitions to allow for common ground in the debate. In Defining Religion in American Law, Bruce J. Casino presents the issue as crucial to international human rights laws. Limiting the definition of religion may interfere with freedom of religion, while too broad a definition may give some dangerous or abusive groups "a limitless excuse for avoiding all unwanted legal obligations".[20]

Religion scholar Megan Goodwin defined the term cult when used by laymen as often being a shorthand that means a "religion I don't like"

As a former member of victory, I agree with this post and the things mentioned above like gossiping their members, leadership dispute, tithes thing is one hundred percent accurate however the title "cult" is not matchh with this article. great job to this anonymous who posted this online so that people especially here in the philippines will be aware of the hypocrisy of the leaders of every nation churches and ministries.

The spirit behind and working within that congregation..
It's subtly shouting at our faces from the symbol in their logo. Steve M. became RB's puppet. RB is the wolf in sheep's clothing.

very true!