State of Connecticut / Fraud, Robbery, Taking Via 5th Amendment
Let's start with this: Money has two factors that define it. It is a thing of beauty if you're mathematically or even poetically inclined, because it's not one and it's not three. There are two specific factors that indicate anything is money and they are:
#1: It has to have intrinsic value; and
#2: It can't vary in quality.
That's it. Everything in creation that has these two conditions, is money. Everything that doesn't, isn't.
Gold and silver have always been considered money in the history of mankind in all cultures because they meet the two conditions, plus they're handy. Actually, every element in the chemistry table of elements other than carbon is money. Water is money. The only reason you don't see people carrying gallons of water to the store to pay for things is because it's not handy.
Diamonds aren't money because, though they have intrinsic value, they vary in quality.
Federal Reserve Notes are not money because they don't have any intrinsic value. They cost two cents to make regardless of denomination. That's an obvious shocker to a lot of people - the fact that someone actually makes a 98 cent profit on every dollar bill; a $99.98 profit on every $100 bill.
Presuming it is the government that does this (actually it's not - the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express - more on that at another time), one might wonder why it (the government) needs so much money in taxes, license & permit fees, citations, fines & penalties and confiscations, and all the other perhaps subtler methods it uses to remove us from our property.
Federal Reserve Notes are negotiable instruments that discharge debt, but they are not money. They are not backed by silver anymore like they were in the days of the silver certificates, nor are they backed by any other commodity that meets the definition of money. The collateral for Federal Reserve Notes is the future labor of the people of the United States as evidenced by the birth certificates. That's a very loaded sentence that we will go into more in a minute, but one of the keywords is future. In other words it doesn't exist now, it may exist later. So Federal Reserve notes are in that category of negotiable instruments called "promises to pay" or promissory notes. They are debt instruments.
In reality, we can't actually pay any debts anymore because all of the real money has been extracted from society. All we can do now is discharge debts. All we have to do is use this fake money or counterfeit money. Federal Reserve Notes are counterfeit money.
You may have noticed that there are so many other examples of real things that have pretty much been replaced by their fake counterparts in the past few generations. Prior to this century, for instance, the only kind of food that existed was real - now it is quite a challenge to go into a regular grocery store and buy any food that has not been polluted by chemicals, insecticides, genetic engineering or over-processing to an incredible extent. Some people don't even know that real maple syrup comes from a tree. The brown sugar water with chemicals in it that you are served in the House of Pancakes may look like syrup, but it isn't.
In a similar fashion, and just like we used to have real money rather than fake money, we used to have real laws (implementing regulations), rather than fake laws like Codes (color of law) that are only applicable to corporate fictions. We also used to have real titles to property rather than fake titles like deeds (color of title). If you really own your land and have an allodial title to it, you are not subject to building codes or property taxes. If you only have a deed, the STATE really owns your land, and if you don't pay the rent (property taxes), they will take it away from you. You can be assured that Mr. Rockefeller has real title to his property.
There are two of so many things these days - one that is real and one that is fake.
There are two "states" of whatever state you live in. There is one that has hills and valleys and rocks and trees and dogs and cats and people in it. There is another one that is a government entity, a corporate fiction. When you fill out a government form that asks you "Are you a resident of the State of Connecticut?", you may presume you know what is meant by the word "resident" and the phrase "State of Connecticut", but you should be sure before you sign that thing under penalty of perjury.
In the same way, there are in a way two of you. The real you was created by your mother and father and God, and if somebody pinches, you will feel it. There is another "you", believe it or not, that was created by the STATE and is a corporate fiction.
Have you ever noticed that whenever you receive a letter from a creditor or debt collector or IRS, it's always addressed to your name in all capital letters? Well, that's because that letter is not addressed to you but to your STRAWMAN. On your personal checks issued to you by your bank, your name and address are imprinted in all capital letters for the same reason.
You may decide you want to have the best mailbox on your block, so you design and construct and paint this fabulous mailbox and you take it out in front of your mansion and you pound it in to the ground on your property. Who owns that mailbox? If one of your neighbors puts a letter in that mailbox that does not have a stamp on it, they can be fined or imprisoned for trespassing on government property.
In the same way, you may have a birth certificate in your possession - it has your name on it - you've had it for decades - you value it - you keep it in your box of important documents. Guess who owns that birth certificate. Of course, it is the STATE who own that birth certificate. At the very best, you may get a certified copy. The original is always kept in the Bureau of Vital Records in the State you were born, in the Department of Commerce. Do you know why in the Department of Commerce? Because your birth certificate, along with all the other birth certificates, is the collateral for Federal Reserve Notes.
Effectively, your birth certificate is the STATE's certificate of title over you.
Now, how did you become chattel property of the STATE (being as the Constitution supposedly forbids slavery)? The short answer is by deceit and trickery. The STATE created a corporate fiction, your STRAWMAN with that birth certificate, and as long as you don't know the difference between that STRAWMAN and you the real, live human being, the least common denominator is the STRAWMAN.
When you're driving on the street, perhaps at a higher speed than the posted so-called speed limit, but you haven't done any personal or property damage, the reason a cop can stop you, hand you a bill at gun point, and deny your rights to travel and due process in one fell swoop, is because the cop is not dealing with you the real, live human being, but only with the STRAWMAN.
Remember we were taught back in the 8th Grade that there are three branches of government - the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative? Well, where does the DMV or the IRS fit into that? They don't. They're in what some people have come to call the quasi-Fourth branch of government - the Administrative agencies. The Administrative agencies would like you to believe they have legislative authority over you. They don't. The only authority or jurisdiction they can claim to have is in commerce, by contract, over corporate fictions.
The real you has God-given rights. It doesn't matter whether you live in a country with a Constitution that supposedly protects those rights or not. You have God-given rights just by being here. The fake "you", the corporate fiction or STRAWMAN, doesn't have any God-given rights, only benefits and obligations under contract, and maybe "civil rights", a poor substitute (fake) for real rights.
Civil rights may be politically correct, but they are counter to nature and real rights. For instance it may be a civil right not to be discriminated against because you have a pointy nose, but the deeper (real, God-given) right is the right to associate with anyone you want to and not to have to associate in any way with anyone you don't want to. If you don't want to hire pointy nosed people just because you don't like pointy nosed people, that is your God-given right.
God-given rights include the rights to livelihood, property, travel, due process, sovereignty, happiness and health. These are not STATE privileges.
Knowledge really is power. It is important to know the difference between what is real and what is fake, and it is also good to know the rules. There are Constitutional experts in jail because they didn't understand how they had contracted away their God-given rights in exchange for STATE privileges. It's important to be familiar with the Uniform Commercial Code, because this is the real rules on planet Earth.
One of the ten basic maxims of Commercial law is this: "An unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true". What this means is that whenever you get a bill, a fine, a penalty, assessment, or demand or presentment in commerce of any sort, it behooves you to respond to it timely, because if you don't - if you ignore it, you acquiesce to the truth of it. You loose your due process, and it may not have been true at all in the first place.
The better way to play the commerce game is to respond timely and request that your adversary respond timely to you as well. Oftentimes it is ridiculously easy to pull the rug out from under an IRS agent or a debt collector simply by making a righteous formal request that they cannot or will not respond to.
Did you know that there is no law that makes it mandatory for any real, live human being to pay income taxes, have income taxes withheld from one's pay, or even file tax returns? How could there be? It is an obvious fact, and the Supreme Court has ruled very clearly that when you file an income tax return, you are waiving your 5th Amendment Right to not testify against yourself. Certainly there can be no law that makes it mandatory that anyone waive any rights.
When many people get an inquiry from IRS asking them where their tax return is, they panic and ignore it, and six weeks later they get an unsigned assessment that contains added in fines and penalties – they’re on the way to being liened or levied. [Actually, the IRS never sends out real liens - only "Notices" of liens, but they usually get the County Recorders to treat them as real liens anyway.]
When you get a letter from IRS asking you where your tax return is, you might write back very humbly, simply and immediately and give them Power of Attorney to complete your tax return for you as long as they sign it under penalty of perjury - you may never hear from them again.
Another way to illustrate using the maxim "An unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true" is also an easy way to explain one approach to terminating unsecured debt.
Did you know that banks do not issue loans? This is a shocker to many people, because we are taught to believe that if we want a loan, we go to a bank. But banks don't issue loans and there is no asterisk on that sentence. Banks are prohibited from loaning their customer's assets because that would violate General Accounting principles. They are prohibited from loaning their own assets because that would violate Federal Reserve Regulations. What's left? Nothing. Banks don't issue loans.
What happens is when you leave the bank with a credit card application or another type of co-called loan application, you are actually giving the bank your promise to pay them with your signature on it. It could be on a piece of toilet paper. It is a promissory note that the bank cashes, and in a simple example, gives you a check of equal value in return. They don't disclose that there wasn't really any loan or any risk or collateral on their part and that they merely paid a clerk $12 an hour or so to make an entry in a computer. [This is what causes inflation because the so-called money is created out of thin air.] Then they (the banks) violate usury and racketeering laws all day every day by charging you principle and interest on the fictitious "loan".
One way to terminate this unsecured debt, without bankruptcy, is: when your STRAWMAN gets the bill, send in a minimum payment with a cover letter that says at the top "Notice of Final Payment". In this half a page cover letter, make a formal request in commerce, that they (the so-called creditor) answer your question, and your question is where was the risk or the collateral for that so-called loan.
Well, again, there was no loan; there was no risk, and there was no collateral. They can't answer that question, and you end up creating a new contract in which your STRAWMAN doesn't owe them anything anymore that replaces the old contract in which your STRAWMAN might have owed them thousands of dollars. This new contract is called a novation.
Evading responsibility is not being advocated by these prior statements. Certainly if you have made a mess, it is up to you to clean it up. But if the mess you've made is a merely a mirage, it is appropriate to handle it by mirage means.
Step by step over the last few decades, the substance of our money, our laws, our rights and our freedoms have been overlayed by something resembling but counter to these precious things.
Our society has become a tyrannical police state. Still however, it is our ability to be truly free human beings because it is our birthright - it just takes more knowledge then ever, and action, to step out of the negative spell that has been cast by the conspiratorial powers that be.
The laying of the groundwork to one's freedom and sovereignty requires dotting all of the "i"s and crossing all of the "t"s and at least three steps:
1. Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the holder-in-due-course of it. This is the single most important tool in your toolbag because this alone changes the presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;
2. Making yourself the Power of Attorney over the corporate fiction; and
3. Copyrighting the STRAWMAN's name. This doesn't just give you another defensive strategy - it gives you a very important offensive weapon, because from this point on, anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything without your permission is trespassing on your commercial property.
You've possibly heard of the term "judicial immunity" a judge has, or so-called "unlimited immunity" a clerk or a cop or an IRS agent has protected by his or her agency. Well, it hardly exists at all. The only immunity any agent has is when they are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction over you the real live person.
When you know the difference between who you are and who you've been led to believe you are (a corporate fiction) and how to effectively assert this difference, the scales of justice are unlocked and the balance of power tilts back to your favor.
Your State Pledged Your Body to a Bank
Birth and marriage certificates are now "warehouse receipts, " printed on banknote paper, that marks you and yours as 'chattel' property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.
A certificate is a "paper establishing an ownership claim." - Barron's Dictionary of Banking Terms. Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.
Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called "warehouse receipts." The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descirbed at 7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are:
-the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored...(residence)
-the date of issue of the receipt...("Date issued")
-the consecutive number of the receipt...(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)
-a description of the goods or of the packages containing them...(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)
-the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent...(municipal clerk or state registrar's signature).
Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as "warehouse receipts" under the Uniform Commercial Code. Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:
warehouse receipt. "...A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security."
Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks. The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt. That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources, " that is.
Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis. This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.
How To Proceed When Stopped
By A TRAITOR/Law Enforcement Officer.
Power can never be delegated which the authority delegating never possessed itself.
N.J. Steam Co. V. Merchant Bank, 47 U.S. 344, 407
In General: The following matters are applicable when stopped by any law enforcement officer and are relevant whether no tag or any private tag is being displayed upon the motor vehicle or whether the vehicle is registered with the state agency which deals in such matters and all documents are in order, or the registration has expired, has been revoked, or whatever. Driving license and registration are irrelevant if the vehicle is not being used in a motoring activity on the public roadways which the state legislature presumptively has authority to regulate.
Remember: Relax and be pleasant. Forgive the officer because he is probably as linguistically, politically and jurally illiterate, ignorant and incompetent as your next door neighbor. If he respects your rights, you will be on your way. If he does not, and you know how to assert them, then you will see him, his supervisors and their attorneys in court and you will win there.
You are a sovereign member of a community of sovereigns all of whom have an unalienable right to travel. Therefore, it is appropriate to behave as a sovereign member of the American nation rather than as a bond-slave or whatever other kind of 2nd class citizen allegedly subject to the will of an elitist class operating by and through their puppet instrument: the metaphysical and all too mythic entity often evoked as The State in all it's fulsome, transcendental, de facto, corpora ficta glory.
Basic Elements: When the officer asks you his first question, it is imperative to answer his question by putting him on good faith notice that you do not voluntarily consent to being detained and, then, posing to him your own questions. If you do not personally establish by your own statement that you do not agree to be stopped, then you are said to allow a presumption to be created that you do agree to being detained.
After you state that you do not agree to being stopped and detained, you must ask the officer if he is detaining you. If the officer answers he is not detaining you, then you must inform him that you will be on your way.
If the officer answers that he is detaining you, then you must ask the officer does he have a well founded probable cause that you have committed a crime known to the people's common law as his basis for detaining you and that you expect a good faith answer from him. If the officer states he has no such well founded probable cause, then you must inform him that you will be on your way.
If the officer states that he does have a well founded probable cause, it had better be connected to your committing some felony crime against the people or breach of the peace known to the common law of which he has knowledge. If his probable cause proves to be merely connected with The State's traffic regulatory-related administrative law scheme, to include any local traffic regulatory-related ordinance, then he is violating your sovereign right to life, liberty and property and by his detaining you he is holding you under false arrest and false imprisonment pursuant to the common law. Of course, if at the same time you are stopped you really are a party subject to the administrative law or ordinance he thinks you have violated, then his probable cause may have a legal basis. But unless you are stopped while driving a school bus or some similar state employee activity, the odds are slim indeed that you are subject to your state's traffic regulatory scheme. Recognize that there are constitutional arguments which will defeat a traffic law violation charge no matter the circumstances.
Should the officer detain you without stating any probable cause reason after you proper good faith demand or can only claim some administrative law violation without being able to show his probable cause grounds why he thinks you are subject to it, then he is proceeding under color of office. He is using color of process. This is proceeding under color of law. Tort damages and civil rights violations-related damages are in the making.
Remember that an officer may have just cause for stopping you, for example, if you are proceeding the wrong way down a one-way street, or the like. You have a duty and an obligation to observe the customs and rules of the road. No one is above the law - not even law enforcement officers, prosecutors and judges.
Every stop must be handled with the specific circumstances of the particular stop borne in mind. But in every case, if you truly understand the law, you need not become the victim of quasi police authority.
If the officer writes you up, it is appropriate for you to write on the ticket before he separates copies: NO CONSENT TO DETENTION. If the officer will not allow you to write such a statement, that is OK, because you are later going to write up an Affidavit of Truth & Facts which you are going to file with the Clerk of Court in the case, and you will indicate there that the officer did not allow you to write your statement.
Conclusion: Always remember your duties and obligations as a sovereign American motorist on the public roadways to observe the customs and rules of the road. At the common law, you are accountable for your actions while driving. Should you cause injury to life, limb or property of another, and following judicial proceedings conducted pursuant to your right to due process of law it is found that you are at fault, you should be prepared to make restitution to the injured party.
The role of the sovereign American motorist does not include a ticket for a free ride in the state of anarchy which the legal sophisticators have been so diligently constructing for generations for and on behalf of their elitist class masters.
The State's quasi traffic regulatory schemes are built upon metaphysical constructs which are in direct conflict with American constitutional government. These schemes are justified and promoted using a 180 degree twist of legal metaphysical calculus to an argument that without these fourth branch of government schemes there would be anarchy on the streets and highways.
These arguments are, as much as anything else, smoke and mirrors to justify a police state upon the premise that people are no damn good and will only act responsibly when traveling if they fear they will be penalized by fines and imprisonment administered and enforced by the wizards, lackeys and stooges of The State instead of having to answer to the people in a proper judicial power court when they flagrantly disobey the common law rules of the road.
These traffic regulatory schemes, from the beginning, provided a ready forum for extortion, kickback, payoff and mutual back scratching schemes. Paramount among these schemes has been the evolutionary development of mandatory automobile insurance coverage, and the business of legal representation by members of private lawyering associations and syndicates whenever a motorist finds him or herself caught in the web of these traffic regulatory schemes.
Only the naive can take at face value the proposition that the traveling world can be a better place for everyone only where the rights to life, liberty, property, privacy, livelihood and due process of law of every motorist is controlled, managed, and generally abridged or abrogated, which is to say regulated, by licensure of him or herself and vehicle and by presumptively being required to have certain liability insurance coverage.
Likewise, only the naive are unaware of the profits which members of the lawyering class crank out of the many types of traffic-related cases brought into traffic courts where the entire proceedings upon scrutiny may sensibly be viewed only as orchestrated opera bouffe performances for the benefit of witless defendants/clients.
We who are not naive have a responsibility to our fellow hueman/human beings and to freedom itself to stand up for our selves and our God given rights as guaranteed us by our state and federal constitutions.
Do you have any knowledge of the “TAKING” CLAUSE in the 5th Amendment? You see the crumbs the government gave them for their properties in the Eminent Domain Case in New London. That’s a Breach of Contract and Breach of The Trust, among other things.
Remember Ronald Reagan? Sure you do…Title 5 of the United States Code, between sections 601 and 627 addresses everything about “TAKING”. There’s numerous explanations about Government taking without just compensation.
Within those sections it says “The 5th Amendment is self implementing”. In other words, all you have to do is bring it up and it’s implemented. It’s not statutory, there’s no statutory necessity behind it.
Those sections were a proclamation written by President Reagan and Congress adopted his proclamation into law VERBATIM. This is why George Bush Sr. didn't want to give up the Ronald Reagan papers. And every bit of it was about government agencies and their actions constituting a “TAKING” without just compensation.
Let me start by informing you that US Citizens have NO RIGHTS! The various government agencies/corporations never inform you of the legal incapacities and disabilities (FRAUD) which are to befall you by registration & recordation. Your private property; be it your home, your car, your body is not required by law to be recorded. (see U.C.C. 1-203 and 1-201 (25, 26, & 27). They have a good faith obligation to explain “Full Disclosure” and serve “WRITTEN NOTICE” in advance.
This is done through fraud, deception and adhesive contracts to confiscate money from the private citizens under the color of law; Which is not law at all..
(Title 18 United States Code §242 Clearly Provides)
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(Title 18 United States Code §245 In addition Provides)
Whoever whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any person from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year or both.
(Title 18 United States Code §1983 Also Provides)
Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
HERE'S SOME CASE LAW
1. "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but a common and fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 NE 22, 66 ALR 834. Ligare v. Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 28 NE 934. Boone v. Clark, 214 SW 607; 25 AM JUR (1st) Highways, Sec.163.
2. "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by a carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a City may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579.
3. "The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125.
4. "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436, 491.
5. The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. U.S. 230 F 2d 486, 489.
6. "Our system of government, based upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him, except as his conduct to others, leaving him the sole judge as to all that only affects himself." Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-6O.
In my particular case; on three occaisions a policeman with nothing better to do ran my plate. I ran no light, wasn’t speeding or anything. He asked me was my car registered. I responded with “give me your name, bond number, the name, number and address of the bonding company, the name number and address of the risk management company handling the bond and I'll tell you anything you want to know.
I have the right to know who I’m doing business with. He had no right under law to force me into contracting with him. RCW 62A.1-207 clearly states: I cannot be forced into a contract by anyone against my own free will. Especially Government and especially not without the information I required from him. That’s all a traffic citation or ticket is, an offer of a contract. He swore an oath to protect me from the very thing he’s doing to me. It’s all in conjunction with the New World Order (NWO). Hear it from a Retired Police Officer Google Jack McLamb who’s Oath of Office was more important than unlawfully collecting revenue for the lawyers/Judges/ Politicians. Google Sheriff Richard Mack Click Here They are What Characterize True Law Enforcement.
1. These violations are Originating in the American Republic Venue under Aboriginal Treaty Law and the Organic Constitution Jurisdiction.
2. The 1778 Treaty between The Delawares American Native Sovereign Nation and the United States of America Nation.
Here’s Additional Authorities Supporting My Civil and Criminal Claims
3. Article VI the Organic Constitution aboriginal Jurisdiction of the District is conferred given to Constitutional Law.
4. Title 28 United States Code Annotated §-1361 aboriginal jurisdiction of the District is given to Constitutional Law Sustaining the Supremacy of Treaties in Law in the Courts throughout the United States America.
5. Title 28 United States Code the Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Part V, Procedure Chapter III, General Provisions at the §-1652 the sub-title being, State Laws as Rules of Decision; is publishing the statutory Judicial claim that the rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States are regarded as decisions except where the Constitution or Treaties otherwise require or provide. The Constitution and Treaties demand the execution of a Civil and a Criminal Claim WHEREAS the decisions from the Connecticut Superior Court are void without merit force or standing in Law conflicting with the Organic Treaty Law and the Organic Constitutional Law that is demanding Justice in Truth.
6. Title 28 United States Code – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Part V – Procedure §-2072 which is publishing the fact that any rule order decision abridging enlarging or modifying any substantive right shall be of no further force or effect after such rules orders decision have taken effect. Again the Decisions of the Connecticut Superior Court is void on its face having neither force nor authority void without merit force or standing in Law conflicting with the Organic Treaty Law and the Organic Constitutional Law that is demanding Justice in Truth.
This will be my Claim To Prosecute for Breach of Fiduciary of Duty.
The following legal definitions from Black’s Law Dictionary provide the foundation from which my lawful claim including Misconduct and Disciplinary Claims process is to be built providing sufficient Forensic Evidence validation confirming affirming the listing of all the possible claims following the definitions to insure a full remedy.
Black’s Law Dictionary provides profound definitions of the actions of the above parties cited in this Claim by the following terms and these actions will be demonstrated as Forensic Evidence in my Intended claims presented by the various Civic Organizations & Ministries I belong to.
1. Belligerency – the status of de facto statehood attributed to a body of insurgents, by which their hostilities are legalized. The international status assumed by a state (i.e. nation) which wages war against another. Page 155
2. Belligerent – One who is hostile or combative which as a state is hostile, combative and wages war hostilities and aggression against its own citizens by a body of insurgents by which their war hostilities are presumed legalized. Page 155.
3. Privateer – A vessel owned, equipped, and armed by one or more individuals, and duly commissioned by a belligerent power to make war upon the enemy, usually by preying on his commerce. A vessel is commissioned by a state or a nation by the issue of a letter of marque to its owner to carry on all hostilities, presumably according to the laws of war. Formerly a state issued letters of marque to its own subjects, and to those of neutral states as well, but a privateersman who accepted letters of marque from both belligerents was regarded as a pirate. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA §-1692 et seq. See Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition page 1195
4. Letter of Marque – An authorization formerly granted in time of war by a government to the owner of a vessel to capture enemy vessels and goods. See Article I §-8 US Constitution. Ibid page 904
5. War – For there to be a war a sovereign or a quasi-sovereign must engage in hostilities. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., C.A.N.Y., 505 F.2d 989, 1005. Ibid page 1583.
6. Piracy – Those acts of robbery and depredation upon the high seas, which if committed on land, would have amounted to a felony. Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life. 18 USCA §-1651. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA §-1692 et seq
The above definitions of terms under Piracy apply to the hostile activities at navigable waters under Maritime Law as cited at 18 USCA §-1651. However, under Privateering these same war hostile combative actions are carried at dry dock on the land within Commercial Law. The Defendant in this Counter Claim is demonstrating and exhibiting the actions and the behaviors in perfect conformity to the law definitions above. The actions of Privateering Terrorist and Racketeering actions are applicable to the defendant and its Insurgent agents as evidenced below:
The Claims will produce forensic evidence showing how the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION issues LETTERS OF MARQUE via Colorable de facto Laws, Statutes, Public Policies, Codes, Rules Administrative Procedures etc to Agencies and the Agents (those listed above) in turn function as the Insurgents committing hostile and warlike acts of blatantly, directly, forcible, employing intimidation, fear, threats, actions such as coercion, terrorism, racketeering, privateering under the Color of Law and Color of Right conspiring against, abridging and depriving the Defendants and access to the Rights and Constitutional Exemptions of the Defendants ands that are Secured and Protected by Law from such actions.
Possible charges under consideration in the Intention of Initiating My Criminal and or Civil claims.
7. Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering Assault and battery against Substantive Secured Rights.
8. Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, §-241 Conspiracy against private property rights.
9. Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, §-242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.
10. The 4th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of security of the Private Property Right from government invasion.
11. The 5th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of Liberty and Private Property without Just Compensation.
12. The Theft of the Personal Private Property by Taking without Just Compensation.
13. The Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering actions against the 1778 Treaty Between the United States Government and the Sovereign Delawares Indigenous Native Sovereign Nation and Steve-Elliott: Sailor and the Consul Minister The Noble Steve Sailor descendants of the Treaty Rights and Constitutional Protection.
14. The Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering actions against Steve-Elliott: Sailor a living National Descendant Soul by Birthright and Inheritance of the Treaty Rights and Constitutional Protection.
15. The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter I §-1985–Conspiracy interfering with Private Property Rights.
16. The United States Code Annotated Title 18 §-1651 et seq Piracy and Privateering activities conducted on vessels at dry dock under commercial law by a body of insurgent Privateers.
17. The United States Code Title 42 §-1983 For the awarding for private personal body property damage.
18. The United States Code Title 18 §-152 and §-3571 provides fine up to $500, 000.00 or imprisonment for up to 5 years for the presenting of fraudulent claims fraudulent indictment fraudulent evidence.
19. The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter II obstructing the evidence in the witnesses through the modification of language creating Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations activities extorting financial means creating economical damage point beyond recovery.
20. The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter III deprivation of the evidence in the witnesses through modification of language creating acts of Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Terrorism Privateering.
21. The United States Code Title 42 §-1986 For knowledge and the right to stop and correct a wrong,
22. The United States Code Title 28 USC §-1746 and Title 18 §-1621 Perjury and conspiring to commit perjury.
23. The United States Code Title 18 §-1001 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b). Extorting private property through the modification of language.
24. The United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 95 §-1651 Interference with commerce by threats or violence.
25. Acting without establishing as a matter of record Proper Jurisdiction.
26. Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Upholding the “Oath of Office” and Upholding the Office of Public Trust.
27. Acts of War against the United States Government Treaties and Organic Constitution Constituting Treason.
28. Violation of Substantive Rights and Private Property Rights Secured and Protection by Constitutional Law.
29. Employing Intimidation to affect Identity Nationality Birthright Thief Using a Fiction Artificial Person Name to Impersonate and Steal the Sovereign De Jure Identity.
No one was born into US Citizenship. The 13th Amendment Clearly Provides…
”Involuntary Servitude Shall Not Exist Within the United States”.
In order to become a United States Citizen you MUST VOLUNTEER! And under the law They have a good faith obligation to explain “Full Disclosure” and serve “WRITTEN NOTICE” in advance. Did they do that? NO! therefore they have no jurisdiction because I never volunteered. This is what they must prove; But they can’t without my consent. And speaking of US Citizenship BAR (British Accredited Registry) Attorneys aren’t even US Citizens. Page 220 of the Immigration and Nationality Act; Chapter 3-Loss of Nationality Specifically Word for Word States; Sec. 349. [8 U.S.C. 1481] (a) (1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application or upon an application filed by a duly authorized agent, after having attained the age of eighteen years; or (2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision. In fact; they're not even licensed to practice law. That BAR Card is nothing more than a Union Dues Card. It's nothing more than the equivalent of a BJ's Wholesale Membership. I’m aware of all the tricks and intimidation tactics they will use to try to get it. If anything they’ll lock me up for knowing to much, at which time I'll have a solid, concrete claim. If everyone in the community knew what I know about this the lawyers/judges wouldn’t be able to exercise jurisdiction over anyone.
For example; they make you get Auto Insurance, Insurance is nothing more than extortion & racketeering. It violates various (RICO) Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations laws. The underlying law is Financial Responsibility.
All you need to know is at www.freedomfraternity.com