Menu
CB Telecommunications Review of K. Govinda Raju
K. Govinda Raju

K. Govinda Raju review: Removal of Mobile Tower In Midst Of Residential Area at roof of H.No.1-5-256, Zaministanpur, Musheerabad Hyderabad, A.P , INDIA 2

K
Author of the review
7:22 pm EDT
Resolved
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
Featured review
This review was chosen algorithmically as the most valued customer feedback.

Sub: Removal of Mobile Tower In Midst Of Residential Area at roof of H.No.1-5-256, Zaministanpur, Musheerabad Hyderabad, A.P, INDIA

We would like to lodge complaint on behalf of residents of Zaministanpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad – 5000020 and thereby putting the life of residents in vicinity in hazardous situation.

Our complaint is specific that, one Mr. Syed Murtuzha, resident of 1-5- 256, Zaministanpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad – had licensed his premises to Mobile Company for installation of Mobile Tower in midst of residential area of Zaministanpur, Musheerabad.

When residents of Zaministanpur, Musheerabad, came to know about this fact, they immediately objected the said installation and also requested to the said Mr. Syed Murtuzha for termination of Leave and License Agreement and stoppage of installation of Mobile Tower and also informed him about the hazardous effect of radiation, which eminates from the said Mobile Tower upon the human body and also shown him report of Deccan Chronicle & various reports.

In spite of this, the said Mr. Syed Murtuzha, flatly refused to pay any heed to the said fact and evasively replied to residents of Zaministanpur, Musheerabad that ”do whatever you want, I will never terminate the said license

As you know that, it is general rule that, the Mobile Tower has to be installation 50 meters away from the residential area as the radiation eminating from the said Mobile Tower causes various effects on human body and worked as slow poison upon the human body. Therefore, various building societies are refusing to install the said Mobile Tower on their building. Hence, the said Mobile Company choosing residential areas as they know that, few people are very greedy about the money and ignorant of their effect

As per the rules it is the necessary to give structural stability certificate and drawings, building owners' agreement copy, no objection certificate from neighbors and surrounding areas and other documents has not been given and the neighbours has objection to this installation in their areas.

We therefore request you to kindly look in to the matter personally and see that the above tower is removed immediately from the above House in order to prevent further damage to the health of innocent people of the area.

Yours faithfully,

Resolved

The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

2 comments
Add a comment
P
P
pamarthi
, SA
Nov 01, 2009 7:06 am EST

I agree with Mr.Raju's complaint, the other residenst staying near to the Tower shall join hands with Mr.Raju and complain to Police, and Municipality. Corporator and other Governement and non-government officials too should support, other wise, renting the Cell Tower for money, temporarily he will be happy and in a long term it is a HEALTH RISK to all other residents.
Best regards

pamarthi
1st Nov, 2009
Saudi Arabia

R
R
R.Arumugam
, IN
Sep 30, 2009 7:32 am EDT

We also faced the same problem. Most of the House/Flat owners in the metropoliton city are money minded and ignore the wealth of tenants/neigbours. Because the govt. officials who have to taken action receive bribe and keep their mouth shut.

Trending companies