The most trusted and popular consumer complaints website
Explore your opportunities! Create an account or Sign In

Justice Neana Sharma, Supreme Court British Columbia - A Judges Stupidity / british columbia appeal court ruling shows importance of court’s role in reviewing facts instead of stupidity

1 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Review updated:

A motorist who is being sued by his passenger after a single-vehicle accident wants his case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The issue at hand is whether the single-vehicle crash was a "true accident, " in which nobody can be held at fault for the vehicle rollover.

Gordon Lipka was driving home from work along a gravel logging road near Powell River, British Columbia on Mar. 11, 2011.

Lipka lost control of his vehicle after driving on to the shoulder. The vehicle fishtailed, crossed the road, travelled up an embankment, launched into the air and rolled before landing. Riding in the passenger's seat was Brad Gaebel, who was injured and is suing Lipka.

The lawsuit was initially thrown out of court in Gaebel v. Lipka, a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released Dec. 22, 2016. The single-vehicle crash was a "true accident where no one can be held at fault for the vehicle rolling over, " Justice Neena Sharma of the B.C. Supreme Court wrote in 2016.

But plaintiff Gaebel was successful on appeal. In a unanimous ruling released Dec. 13, 2017, the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge erred in not drawing an "inference of negligence" on the part of Lipka.

Lipka applied for leave to appeal which overturned Justice Neana Sharma's ruling.

Lawyers for Lipka said there is no shortage of stupid judges who fail to ignore evidence.

Justice Neana Sharma, British Columbia Supreme Court is a judge who clearly ignores evidence.

  • Updated by Lipka, Nov 21, 2018

    Foolish inexperienced judges are everywhere. And we agree Justice Neana Sharma has failed in her duties by clear
    ignorance

    JUSTICE NEANA SHARMA, SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IS A TOP CANDIDATE FOR CANADA'S MOST STUPID JUDGE

  • Updated by Lipka, Nov 21, 2018

    B.C. Appeal Court ruling shows importance of court’s role in reviewing facts: lawyer

    Justice Neana Sharma, Supreme Court British Columbia - A Judges Stupidity / British Columbia Appeal Court ruling shows importance of court’s role in reviewing facts instead of stupidity
    1 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Add a Comment
    A motorist who is being sued by his passenger after a single-vehicle accident wants his case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.

    The issue at hand is whether the single-vehicle crash was a "true accident, " in which nobody can be held at fault for the vehicle rollover.

    Gordon Lipka was driving home from work along a gravel logging road near Powell River, British Columbia on Mar. 11, 2011.

    Lipka lost control of his vehicle after driving on to the shoulder. The vehicle fishtailed, crossed the road, travelled up an embankment, launched into the air and rolled before landing. Riding in the passenger's seat was Brad Gaebel, who was injured and is suing Lipka.

    The lawsuit was initially thrown out of court in Gaebel v. Lipka, a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released Dec. 22, 2016. The single-vehicle crash was a "true accident where no one can be held at fault for the vehicle rolling over, " Justice Neena Sharma of the B.C. Supreme Court wrote in 2016.

    But plaintiff Gaebel was successful on appeal. In a unanimous ruling released Dec. 13, 2017, the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge erred in not drawing an "inference of negligence" on the part of Lipka.

    Lipka applied for leave to appeal which overturned Justice Neana Sharma's ruling.

    Lawyers for Lipka said there is no shortage of stupid judges who fail to ignore evidence.

    Justice Neana Sharma, British Columbia Supreme Court is a judge who clearly ignores evidence.

  • Updated by Lipka, Nov 21, 2018

    Justice Neana Sharma, Supreme Court British Columbia - A Judges Stupidity / British Columbia Appeal Court ruling shows importance of court’s role in reviewing facts instead of stupidity

    Justice Neana Sharma, Supreme Court British Columbia - A Judges Stupidity / British Columbia Appeal Court ruling shows importance of court’s role in reviewing facts instead of stupidity
    1 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Add a Comment
    A motorist who is being sued by his passenger after a single-vehicle accident wants his case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.

    The issue at hand is whether the single-vehicle crash was a "true accident, " in which nobody can be held at fault for the vehicle rollover.

    Gordon Lipka was driving home from work along a gravel logging road near Powell River, British Columbia on Mar. 11, 2011.

    Lipka lost control of his vehicle after driving on to the shoulder. The vehicle fishtailed, crossed the road, travelled up an embankment, launched into the air and rolled before landing. Riding in the passenger's seat was Brad Gaebel, who was injured and is suing Lipka.

    The lawsuit was initially thrown out of court in Gaebel v. Lipka, a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released Dec. 22, 2016. The single-vehicle crash was a "true accident where no one can be held at fault for the vehicle rolling over, " Justice Neena Sharma of the B.C. Supreme Court wrote in 2016.

    But plaintiff Gaebel was successful on appeal. In a unanimous ruling released Dec. 13, 2017, the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the trial judge erred in not drawing an "inference of negligence" on the part of Lipka.

    Lipka applied for leave to appeal which overturned Justice Neana Sharma's ruling.

    Lawyers for Lipka said there is no shortage of stupid judges who fail to ignore evidence.

    Justice Neana Sharma, British Columbia Supreme Court is a judge who clearly ignores evidence.

Li
Nov 21, 2018
Sort by: UpDate | Rating

Comments

  • Ju
      18th of Jan, 2019
    0 Votes

    I totally agree with appeals court and their decision clearly shows the stupidity of justice neana sharma.

    This judge is a complete idiot and has a lack of understanding of the legal system.

    But as lawyers for Lipka have said ignorant judges like her make decisions on instinct rather then facts.

    In my 25 years as a lawyer I have never come across a more idiotic judge who makes no sense in her decisions.

    Another born loser

  • Ju
      18th of Jan, 2019
    0 Votes

    @Justicejoeiop I remember Neana in law school she was such a dork and still is 😂

  • Ro
      21st of Jan, 2019
    0 Votes

    @Justicejoeiop I totally agree she obviously has [censored] for brains not sure how she made it through law school

  • Ro
      21st of Jan, 2019
    0 Votes

    Justice Neana Sharma Supreme Court of British Columbia lacks understanding of legal precedents

    This is a reflection of the stupidity of judge Neana Sharma’s lack of education in law

    Unfortunately there is no precedent to remove incompetent judges from the bench so the public is stuck with this illiterate judge who makes decisions on opinions not fact.

    Ronald

Post your comment