Hopkinsway
reviews and complaints

The Truth about Edward Hopkins of Hopkinway PLLC, a bad, unethical, dishonest and fraudulent attorney, worthy only of debarment.

In 2017 he was involved in a conspiracy to defraud a defendant by way of deceit in a Court filing.

His filings contained so many inaccuracies, he could not claim they were mistakes, and he faked many parts of a complaint, to deceive a Court, one of the most serious violations of the rules that govern his profession.

Edward Hopkins Jr uses his position as an attorney to peddle lies.

He does that to make money, which is fraud. Fraud is defined as wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.

The wrongful deceptions he made were numerous but included the following:-

-Collaborating with a blogger in the same field of work to make a Blogspot about a defendant, labelling him as a conman, and then threatening the defendant labelled as as such, to perjure to Google to remove it even though he was not the author.

- When Mr Hopkins was shown clear proof the defendant did not do it, he did not cease the coercive behaviour (perjure to Google, or face losses)

-He claimed a defendant registered domains three years before he did, and demanded money to remove the same three domains, again, three years BEFORE the date of registration.

-He tried claiming a 6 figure sum in losses, but there is proof to show his Claimant made no losses at all, and sold out in 2017 on travel programs.

-He also claimed almost the same from another defendant 2 years prior, and thus tried claiming twice for the same losses in the same Court !?

-He ordered a defendant to perjure and admit to making a post on Outscam, which Lumen shows, was posted by another.

-He lied and said the defendant fabricated employee complaints, when in fact, six employees of the Claimant, did complain. All of them alluded to the Complainants dishonesty in some way or another.

-His associate Alexandra V Ramirez, fabricated a PACER posting and faked an entry regarding service of process, to deceive Court.

-He claimed the defendant was engaged in extortion, when in fact, his Client has a history of extortion, and Mr Hopkins tactic is to frame people for extortion if they do not either settle, perjure or lie.

-He flouts his duty of candour and truth to the Tribunal.

-He flouts his obligations to meet and confer, refusing to, and then claiming to the Court instead the defendant refused !?

-He tries to make defendants remove Complaints Board posts that are impossible to remove

-He represents Claimants with a track history of dishonesty to Court, faking witness statements, lying, jurisdictional shopping, vexing defendants twice in the same matter, cheating, dishonesty, extortion, fraud and ripping people off, and when they complain, his Client then uses Edward Hopkins to lie in Court to cheat again.

Edward Hopkins is morally corrupted, unable to tell the difference between right and wrong, truth and a lie, and thus should be avoided.

He should also be debarred from his work and investigated for fraud. If he was investigated, it might be found that he has a long history of deceiving the Court, which in some cases, means prison.

...

Poetic justice is an ideal form of justice
In which the good characters are rewarded and
The bad characters are punished by an ironic twist of their fate.
It is a strong literary view
That all forms of literature must convey moral lessons.
Therefore, writers employ poetic justice to conform to the moral principles.
For instance,
If a character in a novel is pitiless and malicious in most part of the novel.
His state has gone beyond improvement.
Then, the principles of morality demand this character to experience a twist in his fate and be punished.
Similarly, the one’s who have suffer at his hand must be rewarded at the same time.

Edward C.Hopkins Jr and Alexandra V. Tracy-Ramirez of Hopkinsway PLLC are dishonest attorneys reported for attempting to deceive two judges at the Colorado 10th District Court (Christine M Arguello and Magistrate Kathleen M Tafoya) by way of dishonest, misleading and fraudulent representation in order to make the judges award damages for a Client involved in serious impropriety, dishonesty and acts of moral turpitude.

There are concerns that these attorneys may be guilty of the crime of criminal fraud.

These attorneys have a history of working for clients involved in serious dishonesty, consumer fraud, criminal fraud, litigation fraud, dishonesty to numerous Courts in multiple jurisdictions, tax evasion and malicious litigation designed to extort monies out of defendants under threat of prison or criminal prosecution (as forbidden by the rules of conduct).

The two attorneys named do the above with full knowledge, and were given an opportunity to tell the truth to the tribunal, but declined.

They have been reported to the Colorado Tenth District Court for fraud.

They were also involved in another Colorado lawsuit which was designed to extort a settlement out of a legal insurance company. This lawsuit too, was also falsified and misrepresented in order to coerce the legal insurance firm in question into conceding defeat and handing over at least US $60, 000 + legal fees which went to Hopkinsway PLLC.

Alexandra V. Tracy-Ramirez is reported for falsifying a Court entry in the PACER database, misrepresenting the date and occurrence of service of process, and thus falsely misleads the Court that service has been accomplished when it has not.

Both attorneys also falsify and fabricate complaints in order to mislead judges, and also in order to deceive search engines into believing webpages are defamatory, although Google have wizened up to attorneys doing as such, and now routinely deny removal requests.

They also falsify costs and make other blatently misleading statements in Court filings, and are careless, sloppy, dishonest and misleading in their work, and thus should be considered unprofessional attorneys worthy only of debarment because they knew what they were doing was wrong.

To see the evidence about these claims, find Pacer and check out this case:- 1:16-cv-02725 Colorado Tenth District Court

Hopkinsway PLLC Fraudulent and Dishonest Attorneys Edward C.Hopkins Jr and Alexandra V. Tracy-Ramirez

These attorneys operate in contravention of Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct which forbides engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation and are thus not recommended.

They represent those engaged in the aforementioned four abuses and thus by association associate themselves with dishonest fraudsters, cheats, liars and the like and thus it would be the truth to say they are fraudulent in their dealings.

There are also concerns that these attorneys attempt to obtain money by deception and misrepresentation which is criminal fraud and cause for an attorneys debarment.

There are also concerns that these attorneys knowingly lie or assist others to do so, in order to mislead the Courts and help others to do the same, in order to procure monetary gains.

In addition, these attorneys tried to sue someone in bad faith who tells the truth, and thus they brought their own dishonesty into the light for everyone to see.

There are concerns that these attorneys may be guilty of the crime of criminal fraud which in simple terms means telling lies to a judge so a judge awards your client money. They are most likely to have committed fraud, because their Client was fraudulent and dishonest, and because their legal filings contain verifiable falsehoods, designed to mislead judges at the Colorado Tenth District Court.

These attorneys have a history of working for clients involved in serious dishonesty, consumer fraud, criminal fraud, litigation fraud, dishonesty to numerous Courts in multiple jurisdictions, tax evasion and malicious litigation designed to extort monies out of defendants under threat of prison or criminal prosecution (as forbidden by the rules of conduct).

The two attorneys named do the above with full knowledge, and were given an opportunity to tell the truth to the tribunal, but declined.

They have been reported to the Colorado Tenth District Court for fraud and may face disciplinary action, which may include debarment or fines, if found guilty of misleading the judiciary with the intent to commit fraud.

To see the evidence about these claims, find Pacer and check out this case:- 1:16-cv-02725 Colorado Tenth District Court

Edward c. hopkins jr and alexandra v. tracy-ramirez of hopkinsway pllc are dishonest attorneys reported for attempting to deceive the colorado 10th district court by way of dishonest, misleading and fraudulent representation.

There are concerns that these attorneys may be guilty of the crime of criminal fraud.

These attorneys have a history of working for clients involved in serious dishonesty, consumer fraud, criminal fraud, litigation fraud, dishonesty to numerous courts in multiple jurisdictions, tax evasion and malicious litigation designed to extort monies out of defendants under threat of prison or criminal prosecution (as forbidden by the rules of conduct).

The two attorneys named do the above with full knowledge, and were given an opportunity to tell the truth to the tribunal, but declined.

They have been reported to the colorado tenth district court for fraud.

They were also involved in another colorado lawsuit which was designed to extort a settlement out of a legal insurance company. this lawsuit too, was also falsified and misrepresented in order to coerce the legal insurance firm in question into conceding defeat and handing over at least us $60, 000 + legal fees which went to hopkinsway pllc.

Alexandra v. tracy-ramirez is reported for falsifying a court entry in the pacer database, misrepresenting the date and occurrence of service of process, and thus falsely misleads the court that service has been accomplished when it has not.

Both attorneys also falsify complaints in order to mislead judges, and also in order to deceive search engines into believing webpages are defamatory, although google have wizened up to attorneys doing as such, and now routinely deny removal requests.

They also falsify costs and make other blatently misleading statements in court filings, and are careless, sloppy, dishonest and misleading in their work, and thus should be considered unprofessional attorneys worthy only of debarment.

Edward c. hopkins jr is also reported for abuse of privacy, and as a result, a defendant in a lawsuit was threatened with death or serious physical harm.

To see the evidence about these claims, find pacer and check out this case:- 1:16-cv-02725 colorado tenth district court