Farrah's Chihuahua's/Farrah Troutman review: Bad Breeder/Puppy Mill/Inbred Dogs/Overbreeds Mom's 186

What is ‘defamation’?

Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living person's reputation.

If a person or the news media says or writes something about you that is understood to lower your reputation, or that keeps people from associating with you, defamation has occurred. Slander and libel are two forms of defamation.

Articles on Internet SlanderArticles on SlanderNet Slander Blog Community Net Blogging
What is ‘slander’?

Slander is a spoken defamation.
What is ‘libel’?

Libel is a written defamation. Generally, radio and television broadcasts that are defamatory are considered to be libel, rather than slander.
Can I sue someone who says or writes something defamatory about me?

In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However, you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions on you.
What about insults and epithets? Are they defamatory?

Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real substance, except to show intense dislike.
Don't I have a right to express my opinion?

Yes, so long as your statement of opinion is just an opinion, not containing specific facts that can be proved untrue.

Are there defenses to defamation?

Establishing the truth is the single most effective defense that can be offered. If the remark is truthful and it "hurts", is embarrassing, or subjects you to ridicule, there is little you can do. Unfortunately, unless the remark is false, you have no recourse.
What are the defenses to a libel claim?

There are three main defenses to a libel claim (other than asserting that it never happened or that you were never involved):

The first is claiming, and proving, that the statement was privileged (and thus not public). Only certain professions (doctors, lawyers, psychologists), or individuals (chiefly your spouse) can maintain that privilege; and if any non-privileged third party was part of the communication, the privilege is broken. (Employees of a professional are only partially covered, to the extent that you needed to use them to contact the professional. Don't expect to tell your deepest, darkest secret to your attorney's secretary, and maintain that privilege.)

The second defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement is true, for "truth is an absolute defense".

The third defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement was an opinion, not an assertion of a fact. Since this last defense is only as good as the weakest or worst, but still reasonable, misinterpretation, it's not one you really want to rely on. There's a world of difference between saying "I think he's a crook, " and "he's a crook". Especially if a third party might inadvertently leave out the first two words when passing your message on.
What damages are available for slander or libel?

If you have been defamed you may seek both actual damages, to recover the harm that you have suffered, and punitive damages to punish the person who made the remark (and serve as an example to deter others).

If the defamation improperly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the Court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of defamation you must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.
Voice Message Broadcasting - Bulk voice mail deliveries to answering machines and interactive voice response (ivr) to live answers, drive sales, branding, web site traffic via our automated voice broadcasting system or auto dialer.

Internet Law Today - The new site to find all your need to know about current laws on the internet. Internet Law is a fascinating area of the law which is constantly changing everyday.

Covert Spy Shop for the best in Cheap Spy Gear and Equipment found anywhere on the world wide web.

Key Vip Las Vegas NV, the number VIP Service Company in Sin City. Call KEY VIP, for VIP treatment at all clubs and entertainment facilities.

I'm writing a book about the very small town I grew up in and changing the names of the people involved. Can I be sued for slander?

If it's the truth, no. Also, if you place a "disclaimer" at the beginning that the people and events have been changed to protect the innocent, and that any similarities to actual persons, either living or dead, are merely coincidental, then no. Remember, you have the First Amendment, which gives you freedom of speech.

Lista you are nothing more then a butt whiper & change bed pans as a nurses aid ..lmao want me to post lic#

Defenses to Libel and Slander

A defendant in a defamation case may raise a variety of defenses. These are summarized as follows:
Truth

The common law traditionally presumed that a statement was false once a plaintiff proved that the statement was defamatory. Under modern law, a plaintiff who is a public official or public figure must prove falsity as a prerequisite for recovery. Some states have likewise now provided that falsity is an element of defamation that any plaintiff must prove in order to recover. Where this is not a requirement, truth serves as an affirmative defense to an action for libel or slander.

A statement does not need to be literally true in order for this defense to be effective. Courts require that the statement is substantially true in order for the defense to apply. This means that even if the defendant states some facts that are false, if the "gist" or "sting" of the communication is substantially true, then the defendant can rely on the defense.
Consent

Where a plaintiff consents to the publication of defamatory matter about him or her, then this consent is a complete defense to a defamation action.
Absolute Privileges

Some defendants are protected from liability in a defamation action based on the defendant's position or status. These privileges are referred to as absolute privileges and may also be considered immunities. In other words, the defense is not conditioned on the nature of the statement or upon the intent of the actor in making a false statement. In recognizing these privileges, the law recognizes that certain officials should be shielded from liability in some instances.

Absolute privileges apply to the following proceedings and circumstances:

(1) judicial proceedings
(2) legislative proceedings
(3) some executive statements and publications
(4) publications between spouses
(5) publications required by law

Conditional Privileges

Other privileges do not arise as a result of the person making the communication, but rather arise from the particular occasion during which the statement was made. These privileges are known as conditional, or qualified, privileges. A defendant is not entitled to a conditional privilege without proving that the defendant meets the conditions established for the privilege. Generally, in order for a privilege to apply, the defendant must believe that a statement is true and, depending on the jurisdiction, either have reasonable grounds for believing that the statement was true or not have acted recklessly in ascertaining the truth or falsity of the statement.

Conditional privileges apply to the following types of communications:

* A statement that is made for the protection of the publisher's interest
* A statement that is made for the protection of the interests of a third person
* A statement that is made for the protection of common interest
* A statement that is made to ensure the well-being of a family member
* A statement that is made where the person making the communication believes that the public interest requires communication of the statement to a public officer or other official
* A statement that is made by an inferior state officer who is not entitled to an absolute privilege

The Requirement of Fault

One of the more difficult issues in a defamation case focuses on whether the defendant is at fault for publishing defamatory comments. Common law rules created strict liability on the part of the defendant, meaning that a defendant could be liable for defamation merely for publishing a false statement, even if the defendant was not aware that the statement was false. Cases involving an interpretation of the First Amendment later modified the common law rules, especially in cases involving public officials, public figures, or matters of public concern.
Common Law Rules

At common law, once a plaintiff proved that a statement was defamatory, the court presumed that the statement was false. The rules did not require that the defendant know that the statement was false or defamatory in nature. The only requirement was that the defendant must have intentionally or negligently published the information.
Public Officials and Public Figures

In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court recognized that the strict liability rules in defamation cases would lead to undesirable results when members of the press report on the activities of public officials. Under the strict liability rules of common law, a public official would not have to prove that a reporter was aware that a particular statement about the official was false in order to recover from the reporter. This could have the effect of deterring members of the press from commenting on the activities of a public official.

Under the rules set forth in Sullivan, a public official cannot recover from a person who publishes a communication about a public official's conduct or fitness unless the defendant knew that the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of the statement's truth or falsity. This standard is referred to as "actual malice, " although malice in this sense does not mean ill-will. Instead, the actual malice standard refers to the defendant's knowledge of the truth or falsity of the statement. Public officials generally include employees of the government who have responsibility over affairs of the government. In order for the First Amendment rule to apply to the public official, the communication must concern a matter related directly to the office.

Later cases expanded the rule to apply to public figures. A public figure is someone who has gained a significant degree of fame or notoriety in general or in the context of a particular issue or controversy. Even though these figures have no official role in government affairs, they often hold considerable influence over decisions made by the government or by the public. Examples of public figures are numerous and could include, for instance, celebrities, prominent athletes, or advocates who involve themselves in a public debate.
Private Persons

Where speech is directed at a person who is neither a public official nor a public figure, the case of Gertz v. Robert Welsh, Inc. (1974) and subsequent decisions have set forth different standards. The Court in Gertz determined that the actual malice standard established in New York Times v. Sullivan should not apply where speech concerns a private person. However, the Court also determined that the common law strict liability rules impermissibly burden publishers and broadcasters.

Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, a defendant who publishes a false and defamatory communication about a private individual is liable to the individual only if the defendant acts with actual malice (applying the standard under New York Times v. Sullivan) or acts negligently in failing to ascertain whether a statement was false or defamatory.

Elements of Libel and Slander

Specific requirements that a plaintiff must prove in order to recover in a defamation action differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which is drafted by the American Law Institute and has been influential among state courts, a plaintiff must prove four elements.

1. First, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff.
2. Second, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made an unprivileged publication to a third party.
3. Third, the plaintiff must prove that the publisher acted at least negligently in publishing the communication.
4. Fourth, in some cases, the plaintiff must prove special damages.

Defamatory Statements

One essential element in any defamation action is that the defendant published something defamatory about the plaintiff. The Restatement defines a communication as defamatory "if it tends so to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating with him." Examples of defamatory statements are virtually limitless and may include any of the following:

* A communication that imputes a serious crime involving moral turpitude or a felony
* A communication that exposes a plaintiff to hatred
* A communication that reflects negatively on the plaintiff's character, morality, or integrity
* A communication that impairs the plaintiff's financial well-being
* A communication that suggests that the plaintiff suffers from a physical or mental defect that would cause others to refrain from associating with the plaintiff

One question with which courts have struggled is how to determine which standard should govern whether a statement is defamatory. Many statements may be viewed as defamatory by some individuals, but the same statement may not be viewed as defamatory by others. Generally, courts require a plaintiff to prove that he or she has been defamed in the eyes of the community or within a defined group within the community. Juries usually decide this question.

Courts have struggled to some degree with the treatment of statements of opinions. At common law, statements of opinion could form the basis of a defamation action similar to a statement of pure fact. Generally, if a statement implies defamatory facts as the basis of the opinion, then the statement may be actionable.
Publication Requirement

Another requirement in libel and slander cases is that the defendant must have published defamatory information about the plaintiff. Publication certainly includes traditional forms, such as communications included in books, newspapers, and magazines, but it also includes oral remarks. So long as the person to whom a statement has been communicated can understand the meaning of the statement, courts will generally find that the statement has been published.
Meaning of a Communication

In some instances, the context of a statement may determine whether the statement is defamatory. The Restatement provides as follows: "The meaning of a communication is that which the recipient correctly, or mistakenly but reasonably, understands that it was intended to express." Courts generally will take into account extrinsic facts and circumstances in determining the meaning of the statement. Thus, even where two statements are identical in their words, one may be defamatory while the other is not, depending on the context of the statements.
Reference to the Plaintiff

In a defamation action, the recipient of a communication must understand that the defendant intended to refer to the plaintiff in the communication. Even where the recipient mistakenly believes that a communication refers to the plaintiff, this belief, so long as it is reasonable, is sufficient. It is not necessary that the communication refer to the plaintiff by name. A defendant may publish defamatory material in the form of a story or novel that apparently refers only to fictitious characters, where a reasonable person would understand that a particular character actually refers to the plaintiff. This is true even if the author states that he or she intends for the work to be fictional.

In some circumstances, an author who publishes defamatory matter about a group or class of persons may be liable to an individual member of the group or class. This may occur when: (1) the communication refers to a group or class so small that a reader or listener can reasonably understand that the matter refers to the plaintiff; and (2) the reader or listener can reasonably conclude that the communication refers to the individual based on the circumstances of the publication.

Click here to find out more!

Defamation Law: The Basics

When an official is criticized in a false and injurious way for something that relates to their behavior in office, the official must prove all of the above elements associated with normal defamation, and must additionally show that the statement was made with "actual malice."

"Actual malice" was defined in a Supreme Court case decided in 1964. There, the court held that certain statements that would otherwise be defamatory were protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The court reasoned that the United States society had a "profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open."

This meant, according to the Court, that public officials could only win a defamation suit when the statement that was made was not an honest mistake and was in fact published with the actual intent to harm the public figure. According to the Court, actual malice was only found when the statement maker knew the statement was not true at the time he made it, or had reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.

For other people that are in the public eye, but not public officials, the defamation laws are also different. These people, such as celebrities and movie stars, must also prove, in most situations, that the defamatory statements were made with actual malice.

Freedom of speech is less meaningful when a statement is made about a private individual because the statement is probably not about a matter of public importance. As noted above, a private person has no need to show that the statement maker acted with actual malice in order to be victorious in their defamation lawsuit.

Defamation, Libel, and Slander: Background

The law of defamation protects a person's reputation and good name against communications that are false and derogatory. Defamation consists of two torts: libel and slander. Libel consists of any defamation that can be seen, most typically in writing. Slander consists of an oral defamatory communications. The elements of libel and slander are nearly identical to one another.

Historically, the law governing slander focused on oral statements that were demeaning to others. By the 1500s, English courts treated slander actions as those for damages. Libel developed differently, however. English printers were required to be licensed by and give a bond to the government because the printed word was believed to be a threat to political stability. Libel included any criticism of the English government, and a person who committed libel committed a crime. This history carried over in part to the United States, where Congress under the presidency of John Adams passed the Sedition Act, which made it a crime to criticize the government. Congress and the courts eventually abandoned this approach to libel, and the law of libel is now focused on recovery of damages in civil cases.

Beginning with the landmark decision in New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the law of defamation has a constitutional dimension. Under this case and subsequent cases, the Court has balanced individual interests in reputation with the interests of free speech among society. This approach has altered the rules governing libel and slander, especially where a communication is about a public official or figure, or where the communication is about a matter of public concern.

Some Reading for Lista...

Defamation, Libel, and Slander: Background

The law of defamation protects a person's reputation and good name against communications that are false and derogatory. Defamation consists of two torts: libel and slander. Libel consists of any defamation that can be seen, most typically in writing. Slander consists of an oral defamatory communications. The elements of libel and slander are nearly identical to one another.

Historically, the law governing slander focused on oral statements that were demeaning to others. By the 1500s, English courts treated slander actions as those for damages. Libel developed differently, however. English printers were required to be licensed by and give a bond to the government because the printed word was believed to be a threat to political stability. Libel included any criticism of the English government, and a person who committed libel committed a crime. This history carried over in part to the United States, where Congress under the presidency of John Adams passed the Sedition Act, which made it a crime to criticize the government. Congress and the courts eventually abandoned this approach to libel, and the law of libel is now focused on recovery of damages in civil cases.

Beginning with the landmark decision in New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the law of defamation has a constitutional dimension. Under this case and subsequent cases, the Court has balanced individual interests in reputation with the interests of free speech among society. This approach has altered the rules governing libel and slander, especially where a communication is about a public official or figure, or where the communication is about a matter of public concern.

Click here to find out more!

Sorry 'bout that hiccup. I had to go an grab my dog. He'd gotten his huge backside tangled in my wiring and nearly yanked the printer off of my desk. Let me tell ya, the knee hole of a desk is NOT made to accommodate a 90 pound Pitt Bull! Old Oscar is about as agile as a one legged man, LOL! AS I was about to say...

THIS complaint was SUPPOSED to be about Farrah, yet it rapidly deteriorated to Nancy of Petshack. Everyone who has any brains can clearly see that it is ACTUALLY Nancy you are attacking, and not Farrah. Farrah is just a second front for you. Farrah is only side issue, and you are angry with Farrah ONLY because she decided to go over to Nancy's side. You were all but willing to drag the lady from Lotsaluv into this, too. Right now, you are angry. That's clear to everyone. I THINK the problem is you feel cheated by Nancy, and want some money back for a dog you bought from her, or from the man who had the dogs on display in Nancy's shop. I can't be entirely sure of what they heck is going here, nor can ANYONE ELSE be sure, because you jump from one subject to another like a politician who has forgotten his script. One minute it's about Farrah over breeding her dogs, and in the next paragraph, you're declaiming about the condition of Nancy's shop, and in the next it's all about some dog that supposedly had Parvo. It's frankly, very hard to get a real handle on any of this. Actually more like...a couple of frustrated housewives, bickering over the backyard fence. The ONLY thing that is clear is that this is about Nancy and NOT Farrah at all.

What makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER is why you are airing your dirty laundry all over the internet, and not over a table in an attorney's office, IN PRIVATE? If someone cheated you, and you have the documentation to PROVE IT, then take it to court. Don't bring it to the internet, and let it explode into a fully fledged FLAME WAR! You, were the FIRST person to mention Judy Judy, Lis, and you know it! You said, and I quote, "I'd like to get you on Judge Judy. She'd take care of you!" But now, when your adversaries are willing to face you on that TV Circus that pretends to be a court room, you suddenly backpeddle, and start in with "My Lawyer doesn't want me anywhere near that show." A LAWYER really WOULD advise you to stay away from making a fool of yourself on TV. That is very true. BUT, Lista, m'dear, a Lawyer would INSIST that you bring a suit against the person who cheated you! This just PROVES that no attorney of any kind has been consulted here, Lista. Not by you, or anyone else! If you HAD been consulting an attorney, you would have been in court long ago!

Your tone of finality, in your last post tell me that you are just about realizing you aren't going to come out on top. It's going to be an even tie, with neither side winning or losing. Too many people are jumping onto Nancy's side, and you are having to fall back on Sockpuppets for supporters. You've failed to impress me or anyone else with your self-important, "I'm a loved and respected "celebrity". Let me tell ya, Lista, m'dear, there are already, more than enough Elvis Impersonators. A Lucy impersonator isn't a bit more interesting...or entertaining. Dressing up like someone DOESN'T make you famous. Or important. It doesn't matter if you drive a Mercedes, a Lamborghini, or a battered Golf Cart. We are all equal in this world. You claim to be a Christian woman, yet you go around violating God's commands when ever the mood comes over you. You say you don't use bad language, yet I've read some pretty nasty stuff. I do agree that the folks on the other side of the fence need to also think before they type as well. People don't come to these forums to read a lot of trash talk. They come here for help about products or services. NOTHING you have posted has anything to do with either. I will go and dig up that legal stuff I mentioned and post it. But, I've had enough of of a laugh for now. I've got a book contract to fulfill, so I need to back to work. I'll pop in from time to time to see what's in the next installment. Take a moment, to THINK before you act, Lista, it'll benefit you in the long run, and keep you having to pay some serious fines. I'm not blowing off steam about those Slander and Liable laws. I have no reason at all to lie. I loathe liars, cheaters and schemers. Everything that I've said is easily varifiable. I think it's time you actually took the time to learn the facts BEFORE you act!

Hey, Lista! Good evening to you! Cookie Pants, hehe, I like that! Nah, I'm not tired, Babe, I work the nightshift. Just can't seem to get the creative juices flowing in the daylight. And no, my fingers don't hurt, I've got one of those voice-module thingys, you know, slip on the head set and dictate into the face mic. I think better out loud. And I composed that stuff last night, while I was doing some research for my current book project. Being able to have five or six windows open at the same time, was one of the best things to happen for writers. And I see you really do have enough brains to have a look at the profile I used for this board. What do you think of the name? I kind of liked it myself. I grabbed a telephone directory from the stack I keep by my desk, give the pages a shake, then tossed it onto the floor. When I picked it up again, I just selected the first name at the top of the open page! Tada! Easy! Got the address the same way...tossed the book, then used the first address at the top of the open page. And the email addy? I just made something up. Peachesplus3...I Love late summer peaches! I can't wait for the tree in our backyard to ripen! Of course, the wife, had to have herself a couple of baskets of them to make her peach jam. Did ya ever try home made peach jam? It's great on waffles. I don't recommend trying that dot come gobblty [censored] at the end of the email addy though. I just threw some stuff together.

You know, Lis, I'm kind of impressed that you are worn out from all the typing YOU do. It can't be easy maintaining all of those sockpuppets of yours. I KNOW the poster called Zach is you, and, so it jersey guy, how many more do you have here? Like I said, you make no effort to alter your writing style in any way? Every time you post, you just repeat your own rhetoric. A stranger, like "jersey guy" WOULDN"T call you by your "Middle" name, and act like he was your closest friend. He supposedly doesn't know you, and is on this board just looking for help, and discovered your post! Your name isn't Lucy. It's Lista. It's been posted here a hundred times, by many people. I think everyone KNOWS who you are by now. Next, a total stranger, like "jersey guy", wouldn't address Nancy by her first name, either. Nancy's name has only popped up here every now and then. This was SUPPOSED to be an attack on Farrah, wasn't it? A stranger would avoid saying things like "The Petshack, Loveshack..." because he WOULDN'T know anything more about Nancy than the claptrap that you've posted here! Unless "jersey guy" wanted to be included in a slander suit brought by Nancy or Farrah. Despite what you think, Lis, m'dear, you CANNOT go just anywhere, and post ANYTHING YOU WANT, about ANYONE YOU CHOOSE! You have to be able to PROVE without a DOUBT, EVERY SINGLE ACCUSATION, otherwise you CAN BE SUED FOR SLANDER, LIBEL, AND DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER! Just check ANY legal site on the web. I'll check out a couple myself, and post the info here, for you, in case you're too lazy, or too stupid to actually check into it yourself.

You see, Lis, I'm not your enemy, and I don't hate you. I'd like to help you, if I can. Sometimes you actually manage to sound like a decent human being. It's a very admirable thing to care about shelter animals and work in a shelter to help them. It's also great that you feel strongly about pet overpopulation. Over population and over breeding is a SERIOUS problem worldwide. BUT, you cannot go around attacking people just because they breed dogs! I've read a LOT of your posts on Facebook and MYSpace...yeah, it wasn't hard to track down your bogus MySpace Page, my dear. You never change your tune, or your method of attack. And, as I said, I've READ some of your posts, and you have MANY, MANY friends who are Chihuahua breeders. Lotsaluv Chihuahuas for one, whom you also slandered on this board, and was called out by the owner of Lotsaluv! You immediately apologized to the lady. But, you DID use her name in the same context as Farrah's, and WERE pointing your finger on her direction. The tone of your rhetoric was quite transparent, Lis. I, personally LOATHE puppy mill operators for mass producing animals like commodities. I have no patience with breeders, who breed and breed, and do not keep track of all the animals they sell, to make sure they don't dumped in a shelter, or even WORSE, a laboratory! I've gotten into a LOT of rows with breeders on social sites for treating animals like a commodity for profit, and not living, breathing, feeling and thinking creatures. I even recall one lady who was attacked on Facebook because she jumped on a breeder for naming one of her puppies $. That's the entire name, just $. That's all that little pooch meant to her. Money! I wanted to help the lady who complained, but she never responded to my friend request. When you ### about Nancy and Farrah for over breeding, or for breeding in general, as it appears to me, you come off as a pompous hypocrit ! It's OKAY for YOUR FRIENDS to breed dogs, but NOT okay for Nancy and Farrah? Don't think so, Lis! You either have a beef with dog breeders, or you don't. You CANNOT PICK AND CHOOSE! That makes you look like a fool, and it shows everyone here what you are all about, which is, making trouble for someone you don't like, and attacking a second woman for being a friend of the first one! That is NOT grounds for starting an internet flame war, Lista. On the internet, EVERYONE despises flamers and trolls. Do you want to have that kind of a label attached to you? Your friend Oktamus is certainly going to have BOTH titles conferred on him. Any via your post, the owners and sponsors of this site can CLEARLY SEE that YOU REQUESTED THE POSTING OF RUBBISH AND FILTH TO DISRUPT AND SHUT DOWN THIS FORUM! You very clearly said, "Let them have it!"

You made a vague attempt to explain your way out of being a co-conspirator in Oktamus' excessive, and highly offensive post. You KNOW it was wrong, yet you did it anyway. You also requested a similar spam attack on a second forum, which I also visited on this board. Spam is HATED AND DESPISED all over the internet, in every single country in the world, Lis! NO ONE has any patience with it, and no one has time for it. Do you have even a vague idea of how many thousands of people who have been victimized and ripped off by spammers and scammers on the web? The FBI has even been forced to create a separate department for dealing with it! You had NO RIGHT to shut this board down, just because you couldn't handle the way people reacted to your posts. Hey, Lista...if you can't stand the heat, don't start the fire! I read the entire thread. You posted a LOT of insulting stuff, and made a lot of accusations, that I highly doubt you can prove. That's dangerous stuff, Hun. And then you go on to post as SEVERAL SOCKPUPPETS. You wiggle out of that one, either. ANYONE can spot the sameness in your writing, choice of words, tone of voice...all identical. You had total strangers speaking as though they personally knew Nancy and had been in her place of business many times! Nancy has a lot of friends, but I don't think she has quite that many, m'dear. THIS complaint, was SUPPOSED

By using people's names and providing their addresses, you put people's lives in danger. I hope you realize that. The Internet is filled with predators and schemers just waiting for some one to do something like this. Here you've provided MORE than enough information for some one to hijack these people's identities. You've also made us targets for every animal rights fanatic or crackpot on the internet. Unless you can absolutely, beyond any doubt, prove what you're saying here, and have documented records to back up your charges, do NOT go around posting stuff like this. I've also filed a complaint with MySpace for improperly sharing private names and addresses, which is in violation of their TOS regulations.

farrahs chis: Do you have any idea how idiotic you sound here? What do you do---sit at a computer 24/7 just to post in response to the comments? You really, really do need to "get a life" other than what you're doing now. I am not attacking you as a person, I'm just saying that the impression you give others is as not a very normal, mature person.

To celebrate, the company first anniversary, Some commodities have been, discount .Anti-purchase at this site Any goods, we will giving a Christmas gift .In addition Buy $ 300 and receive a free glasses or a wallet, as a Christmas gift . welcome all friends to order. Reputation, quality, absolute guarantee. please log in: http://www.fashionsb.com . so what, move your mouse .

You can't honestly believe I'd be dumb enough to post MY address, let alone any public address?
It is a completely made up address, and no, there is no such thing as a "dog headed dragon" I was trying to show the insanity of posting, "testimonials" as "proof" they are a good breeder. See, I just posted a testimonial of my "dog headed dragon" breeding "kennel" Does it prove I'm a good "dog headed dragon" breeder?

Does a "dog headed dragon" even exist?

breezyjr, my goodness hun, posting your address on a public forum is a seriously dumb thing to do! Any loony and his brother can find that information and use it. You'd be surprised with what a hacker can do with something as innocent as a phone number! Far too many people have fallen victim to identity theft. Don't hand them the information on a silver platter! If you want to send some your address, send them a private email!

By the way, wanted to ask. What is a Dog Headed dragon? Sounds like a kind of lizard, or a breed of dog that I've never heard of before?

MAKE Sure You pay attention to these two rules, Lista and Oktamus!

Defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others.

Publish, distribute or disseminate any inappropriate, profane, defamatory, infringing, obscene, racist, indecent or unlawful material or information.

Uh, hey Okatamus you DO remember the filthy stuff you posted to try to shut down this board, don't you? I have a copy in case you've forgotten. How many times did you use the word penis...five, six, or more? There are a lot of other words, too a LOT of them! They all fall under the categories, of profane, obscene, and indecent, wouldn't you agree?And Lista, inciting you to post that stuff? Lista used quite a bit of profanity herself. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

May, 6

Dear Joe,
we should have this out years ago, but wanted to thank you for the great dog headed dragon we bought from you last year.
He is the best dragon we have ever owned, and out vet just loves her. He says she is the best dog headed dragon he's ever seen, and wishes all dragon breeders would provide such wonderful bloodlines.
We have had many dog headed dragon litters with our dog, and they all are just wonderful, proving your bloodlines are pure.
Thank you so much for our very own dog headed dragon, she is just awesome!

Yours in dragons,
Mr. and Mrs. Draggooon.
437 Main st.
Dragonish, NY 01034

Wow, see how easy that was... I can do it to... So, no please do not post any other "testimonials" here... no one will believe you.
IN fact, I think you should all stop posting here, it's not helping anyone.

Yours in Dragons,
breezyjr

Hey Lista, Don't try to pull your wounded DIVA act on me, it doesn't work! And anyone who behaves like you do is CERTAINLY NOT A CELEBRITY! What you ARE is a fat head who thinks far too highly of yourself. If yous are so famous, and everyone in the world loves you, then how come no one that I know has ever heard of you. As a writer, I've had many contacts with stage, and television producers, as well as script editors. I called some of them. THEY have never heard of you either! They had a good giggle when I faxed them your photos! I don't care if you pile on a ton of make up, and wear the ugliest, frumpy clothes you can find, you will NEVER RESEMBLE LUCILLE BALL! NOT WITH THAT FLAT TIP ON THE END OF YOUR NOSE, LADY! By the way, I DID NOT COMPLIMENT YOUR WARDROBE. I called it what was, COSTUMES! COSTUMES THAT MADE YOU LOOK LIKE SOMETHING OUT OF THE 40S AND 50S! It certainly doesn't look good! And you look worse and ridiculous wearing it. Another wake up call for you, Lucille BAll may have had a lot of fans around the world, but for every one who liked her there were THREE who didn't! No one is ever loved by everyone! My husband hated her! Hated Desi Arnaz, too, he was a drunk and a womanizer who was never faithful to Lucy or anyone else. She, in turn, had a number of lovers on the side as well. She was far from being the saint you are trying to make out she was. She is also VERY, VERY DEAD, and has been for some time. Nothing that YOU do will resurrect her! Did you say your husband was Cuban? Funny, I've never in my life heard of a Cuban named Faircloth! An ENGLISHMAN, yes, but not a Cuban. Do try to stop making things up!

And now, let me warn you, Before you go accusing ME of anything you had damn well get your facts straight, and have them legally documented. It might be a good idea to have a couple of witnesses, too! MY ATTORNEY'S DO NOT PLAY GAMES! I DID NOT NOW, OR AT ANY TIME, HIRE SOMEONE OR ASK SOMEONE TO SPY ON YOU! I DO NOT KNOW YOU OR DESIRE TO KNOW YOU, NOR HAVE I EVER BEEN NEAR YOU, YOUR FAMILY OR PLACE OF RESIDENCE! ALL THE INFORMATION I HAVE ABOUT YOU IS EASILY, AND LEGALLY AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET! IN SHORT, PUBLIC INFORMATION. Before you accuse me of spying on you, or hiring someone, you better make sure you can prove it! Unlike Nancy, I DON"T make a habit of warning anyone before I file a suit. They'll find out when the summons is served. Those ridiculous photos I've posted of you? They came from Facebook. A couple of them popped up on my message stream, or on my wall, as the regulars choose to call it, so I popped on over to your profile page and had a look around. That's also perfectly legal, my dear! I can see you've learned a bit of computer lingo, and a few stupid, college texts like ROTFLMAO. Good for you! I had no idea you had enough space in your head for that much info. Tell ya what tho, I am a writer, by trade, made a pretty good living at it, and I've been around the internet since it's inception. I can still remember typing out lines and lines of tedious DOS code just to get one or two commands to work! But, if you want to get into a war of lingo, don't try it with someone who has ten times the vocabulary that you do. You are a circle-thinker, and keep coming back to the same tired subjects. You yell, and scream, and stamp your feet, but you just can't seem to get your way, can you. How many times did you type LOL, LMAO, etc? Must've been ten, maybe fifteen times, including a He, he. Made you sound like a laughing idiot. So you drive around in SEVERAL MERCEDES (that is legally verifiable, by checking with DMV, you know) well, la di dah and woop ti doo! Does that make YOU any better than anyone else? Hardly. Osama bin Laden is DRIVEN around in several chauffered ROLLS ROYCE limosines, but we all know how the world feels about HIM! No one cares if that mini van was given to you, or thrown at you. Having it STILL doesn't make you into anything resembling a celebrity! By the way, before you start calling ME a liar, make Damn sure you can prove THAT as well! All of your loony ranting and raving and self-important bragging about how famous you are and how much people love you, doesn't impress me one iota. Now, Time for a warning, and a reality check. I have read the Terms Of Use for this board. I read everything before I sign it. Obviously you, and your spamming friend oktamus have never bothered to read the contract before you signed it. It plainly says that SPAMMING and PROFANITY are strictly prohibited! And you can be BANNED from this board for doing so without warning. The terms also state that disrupting ANY board is cause for termination. Well, I have sent full complaints to both the owners and sponsors of this site, complete with a copy and paste of oktamus ENTIRE FILTHY POST, making sure I highlight each and every filthy, dirty word he used. I also included YOUR POST, Lista, inciting him to make the post, and I quote, SPAM ATTACK! LET THEM HAVE IT OKTAMUS! Don't try to lie out of THAT one MY dear, it is spelled out in black and white, and in plain site on this board where ANYONE can read it. I've also printed it out, so if you try to delete it, there's STILL documented proof that YOU ARE INCITING SPAM ATTACKS TO DISRUPT THIS FORUM WHEN THINGS DON'T GO YOUR WAY! Why don't you get out one of lacy Lucy hankies and start sobbing now, before you get kicked off this forum, and You ARE GOING TO GET KICKED OFF! No matter how highly you think of yourself, on the internet you are just another trouble maker, a troll that goes from forum to forum disrupting conversations to get attention and the owners of this site don't care didley squat WHO you THINK you look like! Break the rules, off you go! That's it! And see Ya later, fruitcake! BY the way, I've copied your above attempt to incite oktamus to disrupt this site, once again, and I'll be passing THAT along to the owners and sponsors as well. Before you try to play dirty, learn the rules. You CAN NOT just go onto ANY forum and post things you cannot prove, as you claimed above. It is certainly NOT LEGAL! All INTERNET FORUMS HAVE TERMS OF SERVICE RULES. You must agree to them before you join. Violate those rules and your account is not only terminated, but EVERYTHING you posted is deleted as well. In this day and age, when the internet, and forums like this are taking flack from a hundred directions, NO site owner or webmaster is going to let some one like you or your buddy oktamus get his site shut down by spamming and running page after page of filthy text. By the way, they have rules against dirty pictures, too...remember the pic of the pig and the dog. Against the rules, baby! Oktamus filthy spam DIDN'T shut the site down, by the way, I posted after him, and immediately reported the both of you for TOS violations and profanity. You just can't go around spitting out filth on these boards, you know. Oh, and don't try to hack into MY Facebook account. Only an idiot would use his own name on boards like this. Used a fake name to register as well, and a disposable email addy. You aren't the only one who can make up sockpuppets, hun! It's sad, and in a small way I feel sorry for you. When some one has to go to such extremes to gain attention, their lives must really suck. When someone spends so much time, and wastes so much effort, just to paint a picture of famous she is, or much she is loved and supported, that tells me, how desperate for affection she really is. There are doctors and therapy groups that can help you. All have to do is ask. Things will look a lot better when you stop playing dress up, and face the fact you're plain old Lista Faircloth, and no one else.

The pic of the pig and the dog is insulting, but not beneath someone like LISTA LUCY FAIRCLOTH, THAT'S HER PICTURE BELOW! No, you aren't seeing things. She IS dressed up like Lucille Ball. And she isn't going to a costume party. SHE LOOKS LIKE THAT EVERY DAY! She thinks she IS LUCILLE BALL! Even her DOG is named Lucy! This is the SockPuppet Queen who is posting most of the rubbish you see above. Don't know what a Sockpuppet is? A Sockpuppet is a false identity someone uses on the web to conceal who he or she really is. A Troll, goes from forum to forum, just to pick fights. Doesn't matter with who. Trolls are also people who go to websites to talk trash for their friends. By the way, THAT'S CALLED FLAMING! Lista Faircloth has been bad mouthing a friend of mine for some time now, on Facebook, and elsewhere. Her friends have even tried to draw me into it because I said something in my friend's defense. They tried the same shennanigans you're all seeing her, except that I'm NOT Nancy White, and I wouldn't tolerate it. I blocked them, sent copies of their offensive posts to Facebook (who would do nothing, of course), but also to THEIR local authorities. All I needed to do was run their IP numbers, and trace them back to their state and city. Easy. Took all of ten minutes for the lot of them. Each set of IP numbers is totally unique to each and every person. No two people have ever been given the same numbers. Also, there is NO Internet Service Provider with the same numbers. As for you Lista, and I don't care what Sockpuppets you're using today, you need to be aware that you are pushing this into a very dangerous and quite probably, very costly affair. Even though you use a number of different computers to post this stuff, which by the way is actually LIBEL, CHARACTER DEFAMATION, AND SLANDER both things you can be sued for, even though you are using different computers, each post you make is given a unique Date/Time/Location stamp. Each of the computers you used had it's own unique set of IP numbers. Those are the identifying numbers issued to your Internet Service Provider, plus the unique numbers that same provider issues to each account holder. AOL, Earthlink, MSN, your cable company, etc., each as it's own set of numbers that no one else has. It can tell a lawyer, or anyone else looking to track you down, EXACTLY who provides you with internet access, and identify YOU as the owner of the numbers your provider assigned to YOU. It's like ethernet fingerprinting. Cool, huh? Another thing you need to worry about is using those computers in the Courthouse to send this stuff out. Phew! Now that's serious business there! Those Courthouse computers are GOVERNMENT PROPERTY, and misusing them is a CRIME! Even worse, Dear Lista, the Courthouse Computers are ALL on a NETWORK, all attached to one another! Those computers are attached to their own servers, with massive storage capabilities. EACH AND EVERY KEYSTROKE IS RECORDED AND STORE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. Didn't know that, did 'ya? That's right every key you tapped, every click of the mouse, every photo, or bit of data attached to your messages were recorded and stored. If a lawyer, if Nancy decided to sue you, something I've repeatedly advised her to do, it would take that lawyer only a few moments to pull up, every message you sent, including the precise date and time sent. That's pretty damning evidence. Also there were also mot likely cameras recording the people using those computers as well. Government offices have cameras everywhere. They have to! As for those other computers you've used, you know, friend's computers, computers at work, library computers...they also have identifying numbers. The public library and computers at a worksite are ALWAYS monitored, and transmissions and receptions are recorded for safety. What if you had a serial killer working for you, or maybe a terrorist? Keeping records of all computer usage is a necessary tool in this modern times. And I DO hope you haven't used your own or someone else's IPhone or Blackberry. Heck, those transmissions are nothing more than radio broadcasts, and can be pulled right out of the air with little or no effort at all. The provider services for these devices MUST keep careful records of every message, text, or voice call transmitted. You've got yourself into quite a mess, you see. Every word, of every message you send can be traced right back to you. No one is annoymous on the internet...or anywhere else really. Hooray for the information age! So sorry for Lista Lucy Faircloth! By the way, your post above this one, using the troll name gofurself, is so blatanty obvious. By denying that you know yourself, you point the finger right in your own direction. The FIRST thing any criminal, or anyone else who gets caught in the act, always responds with "Who? I never heard of XYZ! But the remark afterwards, all in caps, you know, the way you type when you're feeling frustrated because things are going your way, clearly identifies you. EVERYONE HAS A STYLE, Lista, a certain way of speaking or writing, and it can't be concealed. Not even a trained actor can do it. And the problem of writing "voice", or writing style has spelled the end for many spies, as well. Your own unique voice comes through with every message you type. Now matter how hard you try to sound like someone else, and really Lista, you DON'T try very hard, you always end up announcing just who you really are. You learn things, when you're working in the legal profession, you know. So, now I hear you are planning to make a one hundred percent, solid gold [censored] of yourself on the "Judge Judy Show". That's all it really is, you know, a SHOW. The program is for entertainment purposes only, and neither Nancy nor Farrah are going to loose more than a few dollars, IF THEY LOSE THE CASE. No one is going to jail. No one is going to be charged with anything, and no one wins or loses. Except the sponsors, of course, and the audience that is going to get one hell of laugh from the entire situation. Damn, aren't the owners of those snooty little dogs a ridiculous buncha loonies? is what everyone watching is going to be thinking. The majority or dog owners in the US consider Chihuahuas overpriced RATS! USELESS TOYS OF RICH WOMEN! In the US we love BIG dogs, Rotweillers ( you know about Rotweiller's don't you, Lista, I mean you DO remember that Rotweiller you HAD PUT TO DEATH, just to keep Nancy from rescuing it!), Dobermans, Labs, Golden Retrievers. THOSE are the popular dogs in the good old USA! Yep, I's say your appearance on Judge Judy is going to be one hell of a show! I know I'm going to record it on my DVR! Better make sure you have COMPLETE AND ACCURATE DOCUMENTATION TO BACK UP EVERY WORD YOU SAY, Lista. Judy DOES know her law. And she CAN spot a Cuckoo like YOU any day of the week. Just start in about the dog you say Nancy bred, but was actually bred by someone else! NANCY Has the papers to prove who DID BREED LIL BELLA LUCY! She also has your signature indicating you KNEW who the breeder was, but wanted the dog anyway. Nancy DID offer to replace the dog, even after you CALLED HER AND TOLD HER YOU HAD DROPPED HER! And make sure Judge Judy knows about how many kids you have. Maybe those kids dropped her a time or two? Or maybe stepped on her...I had a couple of kids, I know who rough they play sometimes. AND I ALSO KNOW YOU DON'T BRING A CHIHUAHUA INTO A HOME WITH SMALL CHILDREN! By the way, there's nothing wrong with small breeders. They produce far healthier and better adjusted dogs than people with larger kennels. Funny, you DON'T seem to have a problem with the DOZENS OF OTHER BREEDERS YOU CHIT CHAT WITH ON FACEBOOK! Just Nancy, and now Farrah because she took Nancy's side in this little war of yours. I am Facebook friends with quite a few of those BREEDER FRIENDS of yours, so I do get snippets of YOUR conversations with them. Facebook publishes everything that's exchanged between friends, and FRIENDS OF FRIENDS on down the line. Remember, owner Mark Zuckerberg loves a good laugh, and he likes to print out conversations of people bickering back and forth, and share them with his friends at all those millionaire parties. Makes him feel superior, I guess. I've read a lot of what you've said on F acebook and had quite a few laughs. What DOES raise my hackles though is this constant BS claiming that Nancy's house is dirty, and YOURS IS SO SPOTLESS! Can you people get any more arrogant or ignorant? What right have ANY of you got to call another person's house dirty, then go about sharing CERTAIN photos, that SEEM to back up your insults with everyone and anyone. Those of you who have children and pets and certainly NOT claim your homes are pristine and spotless! Both kids and dogs are dirty. I've had them both. They'll wreck it as fast as you clean it, and THAT is the truth. Unless of course, you are all so filthy rich you can employ maids to pick up after your kids and your dogs, or cats, or birds. I've been in Nancy White's house, a number of times, and not always expectedly. No matter when I've been there, I have NOT seen a single thing to even think about calling it dirty! Yeah, it's a bit cluttered. She Does live in a place above her shop, so her space is limited. She has a lot of dogs. NO KIDDING! SHE IS A DOG BREEDER! If a breeder doesn't have a LOT of dogs, the dogs can end up being INBRED! All of Nancy's dogs and puppies, the ones I've personally seen, were very friendly, had beautiful, clean coats (no bite marks from fighting for their food, Lista!), bright eyes, and wonderful personalities. Yeah, she had a cage or two, but the cages were FOR THE PROTECTION AND WELL BEING OF SICK OR RESCUED DOGS. You do NOT allow a sick dog, or a rescue animal to mingle with your others. The sick one because it's too weak, the rescues because you mus be sure they are disease free before letting them join the others. THOSE are the ONLY cages Nancy has! Period! Anyone who tell you different is a liar! Nancy's dogs are all kept in separate quarters. The males in one area, the female in another, to prevent unwanted, uncontrolled breeding. Nancy's Rotweillers interact very well with her Chis, but all the same, she never allows them to hang out together without supervision. Her exotic birds, are kept mainly in cages. Doh! Who want's bird's pooping everywhere, and large birds can be destructive and chew things. My Cockatiels have chewed up a lot of things when they were out for exercise, believe me. By the way, Lista, even Chihuahuas in SMALL groups, INCLUDING LITTER MATES, will squabble over food! I have three young pups, Chihuahuas, and even though they love each other at other times, running and playing together and sharing toys, they FIGHT AT MEAL TIME. Face it! Chihuahuas are a hot tempered species. They also tend to want their own way about everything. All of my pups and adults get equal servings of food I prepare for them. No commercial garbage for my dogs. There is road kill and dead, euthanized pets in that crap! All the same, my dogs, growl, and bite, and occasionally attack one another at meal time. It has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE NUMBER OF DOGS. Only in temperament. My pups came from a gentle, adorable little sire, but Momma was and is strictly AGRO. She's spoiled rotten, and Queen of the House, and KNOWS it! She my husband's little girl, and demonstrates a LOT of his traits, especially his temper. The babies all ended up with Momma's temperament, and noting from Daddy that I've seen so far. All of this clap trap you've been spreading, Lista, is WRONG and you know it. Problem is, you don't know when to quit and start acting like an adult. Just because you have the deluded idea that you look like Lucille Ball - Trust me. I've circulated your pictures. Everyone agrees. You look nothing like her, no matter how much make up you slap on! You may THINK you look like Lucy. You may dress like some addle-headed woman from the 1950s, and strike poses to imitate her, but that doesn't make it so. YOU ARE NOT LUCILLE BALL! YOU DO NOT REMOTELY LOOK LIKE HER. THIS IS NOT THE 1950s, AND YOUR HUSBAND ISN'T CUBAN BANDLEADER NAMED DESI! You are Lista FAircloth, of Florida. Nothing more, and nothing less. You spend a dangerous amount of time watching old black and white reruns, and playing I Love Lucy dress up. Does your life suck so bad that you need to immerse yourself in this Lucy fantasy? Who in the hell told you you resembled Lucille Ball in the first place? Yikes! Get yourself some therapy woman, before to fall ALL THE WAY off your rocker! Get your hair styled. Let it return to it's natural color, and buy some new clothes. Trust me, your kids will thank you for it. I mean, have you ever thought about your kids. I bet they're all laughing stocks in school! I know that I would be ashamed to have a mother that looks and dresses like YOU do! Stop annoying other people. If you have a legitimate case against Nancy, and can PROVE IT WITH DOCUMENTATION AND WITNESSES, then sue. If not, and this is just something that boiling on the back burner in your head, dump it. I assure you, Nancy DOES HAVE PROPER DOCUMENTATION TO PROVE EVERYTHING SHE SAYS, AND MANY, MANY, MANY SATISFIED, HAPPY CUSTOMERS! She has many friends who will stand by her. WILL YOUR FRIENDS STAND BY YOU IN A COURT OF LAW, OR WILL THEY RUN FOR COVER TO PROTECT THEIR OWN ###. You'd be wise to expect the latter. No one will stick his or her neck out, unless they are a hundred percent sure of the outcome! It's one thing to talk trash on the internet, and another to face a judge in a court of law. This is a case you cannot win.

Don't you have some cleaning to do in your barn.Pooper sco0pers come in handy.You really need some growing up Farrah.I just can not believe from reading all this crap, that you are a 60 yr old woman and yet you act like a damn child.WOW

Really, it took you this long to finally be the "adult?"

That is laughable. But, at least one of you is trying.

I am going to be the adult here and stop this, please do the same Lista and Farrah do the same :)

wow... that took up a lot of room... And, made about at much sense as this entire complaint... thanks for sharing...

You all sound flippin' looney!
I can't believe after reading 3 or 4 pages of this thread, all of seen are a few gals (I assume, due to names) bickering back and forth.

Liar, liar, Plants for hire...!

Can you all just grow up, you've proved nothing, except maybe that you all have waaaaay too much time on your hands going back and forth on this board every few minutes...

For someone who has a job, grooming, you have an awful lot of time, being on here trying to defend yourself.huh

Pethag, grow the ### up, and stop breeding sick dogs.

Lista you breed, and everyone can believe what they want to .. I know the facts and this is what it ALL boils down to ... YOU WILL NEVER HAVE MY LINES.. .BLaa Blaa Blaa I know some idiot will beg the differ, I know the truth and have emails to prove it :)

I DO NOT BREED ANYTHING! I CHOOSE NOT TOO! ###! LIAR

Oh wait Farrah with is that post of her saying " My new Stud Muffin" that I have now reg as CKC ... wow the crap is really getting deep with this crazy person. Now I know why she backed out on Judge Judy Show! She has to much to hide and I would air out ALL her dirty laundry!

Very true animalcop I am a volunteer in many shelters in my area and I have seen first hand how many beautiful dogs are put to sleep almost daily I have nightmares from it! It breaks my heart to know how many useless lives are being euthanized because of irresponsible humans! The more I do rescue The more I hate humans! LIAR! you your self take them to the shelter... Oh they bit your unruly kids .. maybe your kids need to be put in another home with a normal family

this is such a joke, does any of you have even a clue? you are all over the board ... now you wanna make fun on how people look ? I know you Lista are 50.. you think you would have grown up my now but Hey if this makes you feel like a big girl & you can wear your big girl pants ... have at it, but watch out for Karma

Keep this topic in the top 5! Let everyone know about all the Puppy Mills and BYB's who breed for profit while Shelters are overflowing and euthanizing precious pets.

BECAUSE OF ### LIKE THESE!

Yep your hated by these 3 Breeders,
go save the world

You breeders are pathetic.Farrah get off disability, and go out and get a job, stop living off your dogs..and your mother.

Hey Lista, Are you still doing nails cause I miss the great manicures that you do. Kathy

WHO CARES FARRAH..YOUR JUST ANOHER UNFORTUNATE HILLBILLY THAT BREEDS FOR THE MONEY.In the U.S., homelessness is not just a human problem. U.S. animal shelters must put to death nearly 4 million dogs and cats every year because of simple math: too many animals and not enough worthy adoptive homes. You can help prevent this; it's as easy as ABC—Animal Birth Control!

Never Breed or Buy. Always Adopt. Always Spay and Neuter.

Please join countless other kind people who are practicing animal birth control. Find out how you can help, and please pledge to practice animal birth control.

Every year in the United States, open-admission animal shelters across the nation are forced to put to death roughly half of the 6 million to 8 million unwanted dogs and cats who pour into their overwhelmed facilities. Wonderful, healthy, social, loveable animals lose their lives because of simple math: too many animals and not enough homes.

Every animal bred and born—on purpose or by accident—and every animal purchased from a breeder or a pet shop fills a home that could have taken in a dog or a cat dying for a home at a local shelter. Never breed or buy from breeders or pet stores, and always practice your ABCs—Animal Birth Control—to work toward the goal of a "No-Birth" nation.

The Goal: A 'No-Birth' Nation
The only way to make our communities "no-kill" is to work toward a "no-birth" nation through legislative measures that mandate spaying or neutering unless a proper permit is purchased, with permit revenues used solely to subsidize sterilization surgeries for low-income families and citizens. For a list of jurisdictions that have passed such laws, please click here.

Until people spay and neuter their animals, euthanasia will remain a tragic necessity. No one wants to have to euthanize animals—least of all those who hold the syringe—but every day, animal shelter workers see fates far worse than a humane death: animals who are cruelly killed by mean people; animals who are chained, neglected, and starved; animals who perish on the streets, where they are considered a public health threat and a nuisance; and more.

Be Part of the Solution: Practice Your ABCs!
Sign our pledge saying that you will never buy an animal from a pet store or a breeder and that you will practice your ABCs! If you already have an animal companion in your family from a pet store or breeder, that's OK! Pledge not to buy again and to practice your ABCs!

Be an ABC volunteer! We are looking for volunteers to help citizens make life-saving spay/neuter services a reality for their animals and their communities. If you want to get more involved in your community, e-mail us for more information!

To receive more ideas on how you can help animals, join PETA's Action Team.

...

you think your friend would tell you to get the lipstick off your teeth before making public.. OOPS

tell her to go to court & it will I will make sure of it!

Ya Lista You need your friends here.. as you are falling in...ROTFLAMO

I did try to talk to her .. You did ? Ya OK still waiting for fax from your vet to my vet.. almost 1 yr now. Nice try!

AND I WILL ASK ONCE AGAIN WHAT ROTTI AND CHIHUAHUA I HAVE HEARD THIS AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT IT IS ABOUT!? PROVE IT! I HAVE SAID THAT BEFORE! LIAR ask the rescues that you pissed off over this.

And my health guarantee was from Petshack Chihuhaua's Why would you guarantee some one elses puppies? "WHY YOU ASK? Because it was sold out of my shop & by ME!

Also why would you bring stray animals in the same place you breed animals.** You have no idea how big my place is and I have been doing this for over 6yrs, My vet helped me open my shop up. No not the one YOU think you know and are slandering .. Dr Anderson is now passed.**

Is it not a fact you have had an outbreak of Parvo? Out Break?** no dont think so, did I have it vets are not sure puppies had shots 6 days prior to first sign .. and most know can happen to anyone at anytime . And it was reported to manufacture and DHEC.. Yes it was a bad batch!**
Lost several puppies? You say a bad vaccination~~?**Sure did !**

I say the stray rotti? The transport man said when he transported the dog it vomited and had loose bowels the entire trip very sick! Shortly after that your shop was infected with Parvo?
**Sorry wrong again he was sent to FLA to GARR { Guardian Angel Rottweiler rescue} and had mange and is doing great & has been adopted** Nice try Lista..you such a mess it is not funny anymore but very sad

I did try to talk to her and she was very nasty after the sale! ** Liar* I gave you name & # of who bred her so you could ask him all your questions about parents.**

Her next statement was "Bring your attorney on" so this is why we are today! ** Wrong this was after you where showing pictures around of a dog I did not sell YOU, I think she is dead myself maybe husband dropped & Killed her like the last one?**

She hates the fact that I exposed her publically and that is too bad! ** No it is that you have talked the talk now for almost 1 yr and have done many things to try to hurt my business .. yes My name not my Chihuahuas and this my friend is not legal**

I actually did not know about her~ my attorney told me and ask me WHY DID YOU BUY A PUPPY FROM A NASTY PLACE LIKE THIS? I did not know until after the sale that her conditions were this way. ** You still have no clue, if I felt I had something to hide you think I would post those pictures.? really? When you steal 22 pictures and make your own album yes it will look bad, but most sugar coat theirs or do not show you I have nothing to hide and my place is open to the public 7 days a week and I'm also in city limits, police come to check on all business here and are in my shop daily **

** and why would you want more from me, which I declined to sell to you and this is what all this boils down to**

And Yes a lady did take her dog home, and took her straight to vet . I called & vet checked her out fine, they stuck her in a Play pen at 11pm with NO food NO water and on her first night.. she stressed and 6 dyas after shot she will test positive for parvo, I wanted to go pick her up at vet.. they said "NO Our dog & we are putting her to sleep she has parvo" I wanted Neo done... they again said " NO she is being cremated" .and I offered them another puppy from kindness of my heart.. they killed her I have the records. You really need ALL facts there are 3 sides to every story, but you keep posting your trash .
If you where so right Lista YOU would meet me in court of my choice since I filed and the puppy was bought in SC .. sorry :) Maybe you got scared when I siad " You must bring the puppy you bought from me" I don't know but it has nothing to do with " your attorney" if you had one he would have told you to keep your nasty trap closed along time ago and NOT to hack into someones computer... yes MINE remember?
FYI have to come here since you declined to go on TV with me in front of a REAL judge ... I 'm way ready trust me! Karma is a ### and it will hit you, I really don't have to worry what you or others have posted .. it is all the ones that have never meet me, my dogs or have been to my Grooming shop.

Lista I think the puppy you got from me is dead. The pictures you are posting saying they are her, they are not . I have the pictures of her in my shop & when Tammy was in Fla waiting for you for 3 days .. Yes 3 days as you did not want your "live in" to know you where buying a dog & also when you paid for her you had to wait to one of your kids walked away so they would not tell your "Live in" that you bought her. You also did this with Frarah's puppies. You are a sneak, liar & drama Mama! You stalk people, you hide behind your lies & on FB they are learning all about you . Trust me I have a folder with your name of it and they are not your fans. And you have never contacted me personally and I have no clue what your complaint is about.. you have been all over the board. Get over it & get a life!

Listen to all of you shouting and calling names, and acting like three year old children! You are all SUPPOSED to be responsible adults. Trust me, arguing with Lista Lucy Faircloth is NOT the way to deal with her. The woman quite obviously suffers from a SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS. I had to deal with a family member with mental health problems, and I can tell you, LISTA LUCY FAIRCLOTH, the woman who is posting here as VOICEFORTHEANIMALS, presents MANY obvious symptoms. 1. An INTENSE delusion that SHE is the living incarnation of Lucille Ball. She DRESSES in 1940s-1950s costumes that very closely resemble the outfits Lucille Ball wore in the "I Love Lucy" TV Series. She has died her hair the same color as Ms Ball's - a brassy, gawdy RED! She WEARS the EXACT SAME HAIRSTYLE that Lucille Ball wore in the "I Love Lucy" TV series. She's OBSESSED with the fact that HER middle name is also LUCY. She has even named HER DOG, LIL BELLA LUCY! The woman drives around town in a mini van with a huge "I Love Lucy" decal displayed right on the HOOD! In just about every photo I have been able to find of her on the web and elsewhere, she is INVARIABLY dressed up in one of her Lucille Ball costumes, and adopting a "Lucy-like pose. She BRAGS about being an "I LOVE LUCY" look alike! Take a look at the photo below. That's Lista Lucy Faircloth, and Lil Bella Lucy BOTH dressed up in their " I Love Lucy" outfits! Does she look even REMOTELY NORMAL to you? Absolutely not! 2. She harbors an obsession about a woman who owns and operates "Petshack Chihuahuas". She honestly believes that the dog she purchased from the Petshack store, a DOG SHE KNEW IN ADVANCE WAS NOT BRED BY THE OWNER OF PETSHACK CHIHUAHUAS, but purchased anyway, was indeed bred by Petshack. She also maintains that her dog - Lil Bella Lucy - was either inbred or poorly bred, and that bad breed was the reason why her dog has neurological problems. She refuses to accept the fact that SHE HERSELF DROPPED THAT PUPPY THE DAY SHE BOUGHT IT, and even called Petshack to say so and ask for advice! She also REFUSES TO ACCEPT that one of her own children STEPPED ON THAT SAME PUPPY! Of course she has neurological problems! Being dropped and stepped on in the same day! 3. She has totally confused The owner of Petshack with another woman who WAS arrested and charged with owning and operating a puppy mill. The owner of Petshack, in fact, was instrumental in arranging for many of those puppy mill animals TO BE ADOPTED! 4. Her confused state of mind also led Lista Lucy Faircloth to prevent the owner of Petshack from rescuing a Rotweiller and his Chihuahua companion, which led to BOTH of those dogs to BE KILLED. They call it Euthanasia. I call it killing, because that's exactly what it is! So, the Holier than Thou Mrs Faircloth CAUSED THE DEATHS OF TWO PERFECTLY ADOPTABLE DOGS just because she wanted to spite the owner of Petshack! Is THAT sane? Hardly! Mrs Faircloth, How can you call yourself AVoice For The Animals, when you hatefully CONDEMNED TWO ANIMALS TO DEATH! From my point of view, that make YOU a MURDERER! 5. Her obsessive hatred for the owner of Petshack drives her to spread rumors EVERYWHERE SHE CAN accusing the owner of Petshack (I am purposely not using the lady's name because I think of her as a good friend. Someone who's knowledge and experience with animals has helped me through some very difficult situations) owns and operates a puppy mill. She knows this is a BLATANT AND TRANSPARENT LIE"! ALL of Petshack's puppies are delivered by hand with loving care, and kept STRICTLY IN AN INDOOR, CAGE FREE ENVIRONMENT! They also get time outdoors in the fresh air and sunshine as well. Petshack does own quite a few dogs, both male and female, in order to produce puppies that are NEVER INBRED! She keeps careful and meticulous records and can even tell me about many generations of her dogs' bloodlines! She works closely with a veterinarian, who cares for all of her dogs and puppies, and signs his name to the health certificates of each and every pup! Because Petshack breeds rare blues and blue merles, she is super careful to keep track of all of her dogs. There ARE a number of cages on the property, but those are for SICK OR SPECIAL NEEDS DOGS, OR DOGS SHE HAS RESCUED AND MUST BE QUARANTINED FOR A SHORT TIME TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE OTHERS. This IN NO WAY makes Petshack a puppy mill breeder! Those of you, WHO ARE OBVIOUSLY HER FRIENDS, CAREFULLY COACHED AND COERCED TO POST REMARKS HERE, are as transparently obvious as Mrs Faircloth herself! NONE of you have ANY EVIDENCE or can PRODUCE A SINGLE WITNESS to back up a word that you are saying! NONE OF YOU can produce ANYONE WHO HAS PURCHASED A SICK DOG FROM PERTSHACK! NOR CAN YOU PRODUCE ANYONE WHO HAS EVER BEEN RIPPED OFF BY HER! Unlike Lista Lucy Faircloth, who has been GUILTY OF TAKING MONEY FOR DOG FASHIONS WHICH SHE NEVER BOTHERED TO SHIP! I also should had that those dog fashions were called "I LOVE LUCY COUTURE"! Again, we see the "Lucille Ball Obsession" very clearly! Next, Only A VERY FEW OF YOU have ever been anywhere near Petshack's place of business! The REST spend their time POSTING HATEFUL MESSAGES ON FACEBOOK, AND FRIVOLOUS SITES LIKE THESE DEFAMING, HARASSING, AND THREATENING Petshack's owner. I have been following this nonsense for some time now, and have even been a victim of the lies and hate speech! I have nicknamed all of you the "I HATE NANCY GANG"! Let me tell you why they attacked me. I spoke up for Petshack! Bad idea, around this gang homonal harpies! One of them, who didn't know or ever met me, attacked me for not liking dog shows, or dog show people, and sent me a huge amount of PROPAGANDA put out by the REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY to make the much respected organization; PeTA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), of which I am a long time member, appear to be a group of fanatics who secretly kill animals! It took me ALL OF THREE MINUTES to scan down to the bottom of the website's home page and discover the name of the Webmaster (owner) of the site. It was the CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF AMERICA, in other words THE TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS! Now why would these Tea Party fanatics hate PeTA so much? Well, because PeTA is constantly placing agents inside GOVERNMENT OWNED AND OPERATED FACILITIES, who get VERY REAL EVIDENCE that these facilities carry out cruel and UNNECESSARY experimentation on animals using THE TAXPAYER'S MONEY! PeTA has also brought THOUSANDS of lawsuits against a great institutions in which our politicians are STOCK HOLDERS OR HAVE INVESTMENTS. Now you don't think they get elected to serve the people? If you do, you are deluded as Lista Lucy Faircloth. Politicians get elected to GET EVEN MORE RICH THAN THEY ALREADY ARE! Serving the people has NEVER entered their minds! Sorry, I'm off track, here. And now I see the "I Hate Nancy Gang" are setting their sites on Farrah's Chihuahuas! And AGAIN she is POSTING THE SAME, TRANSPARENTLY OBVIOUS LIES! "Farrah, you have EVERY RIGHT to be angry, but PLEASE, take my advice, and DO NOT respond with profanity or anger. This is EXACTLY THE RESPONSE LISTA LUCY (OR IS IT ANN) FAIRCLOTH is counting on. She wants you to look like a low life, uneducated and crude. While she comes off smelling like roses. She is even casting aspersions on LOTSALUV CHIHUAHUAS trying to drag her into it too. Tammy, or LotsaLuv, don't fall for her pithy apology. She MEANT EXACTLY WHAT SHE WROTE ABOUT YOU. For some reason tho, she seems to be afraid of what you might do, and posted a quick retraction. There are a lot of you like ZACH who posted what is an obvious TERRORISTIC THREAT against Nancy of Petshack, and THEN goes on to LIABLE, AND DEFAME Farrah, calling her mentally ill and insulting her because she lives on disability. Listen Pal, I am ALSO DISABLED AND LIVING ON DISABILITY! It is NOT a crime, or is it ANYTHING TO BE ASHAMED OF! I've endured more in my life than YOU will ever dream of! HOW DARE YOU LOOK DOWN YOUR NOSE AT DISABLED PEOPLE! It is obvious that you, Zach are one of crazy Lista's cronies, so WHY ARE YOU NOT TALKING ABOUT HER MENTAL INSTABILITY? NO SANE WOMAN WOULD GO AROUND DRESSED UP LIKE I LOVE LUCY, AND PRETENDING TO BE HER! I feel so sorry for Mrs Faircloth's kids. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO LIVE WITH A MOTHER WHO LOOKS AND ACTS LIKE THAT? God, talk about Child Abuse! Her kids must be ashamed to go out of the house! I mean what does Lista call her husband? DESI? Wouldn't surprise me! What KIND of a husband is he, to not get her the help she so badly needs? I'll end this by warning Mrs Faircloth, Zach, and ALL of her supporters. YOU CANNOT GO AROUND SPREADING LIE AND RUMORS ON THE INTERNET OR ANYWHERE ELSE! That is a crime punishable by fines and imprisonment, and think of the publicity in the media! Good Lord you'll all be laughing stocks! All the public needs to do is GET A LOOK AT LISTA LUCY FAIRCLOTH IN ONE OF HER MANY LUCY COSTUMES, and people will be rolling on the floor laughing their a*ses off! Her pictures will be EVERYWHERE! If you have one sane thought still remaining in your head, Lista, you'll stop this crazy campaign of yours and slide back under the slimy rock your creeped out from under, before YOU are the one who's name is being published all over the Internet! Use the time to go shopping for some NEW MODERN clothes, and get your hair restyled so you look half way to normal. You are NOT LUCILLE BALL, NOR HER REINCARNATION, NOR ARE YOU EVEN CLOSE TO BEING A LOOK ALIKE! You are a fan who let her obsession get out of hand. YOU CAN GET HELP! Just ask for it!