Datingpsychos.com review: Anonymous Internet Defamation 22

I love how you prep food. It is just one of the things I have learned from you. This is going on next week’s menu. I prefer the reds and orange for stuffing, and for some reason I like the horizontal cut. I think it is because of the proportion of filling to pepper. Anyway, thanks again. I really appreciate you.
Holly Hooper

Love your post! Do you ever start w/ frozen g. beef? If so, how much time do you add to the cooking? I have a whole freezer full of g. beef.
Kelly Hubbard

I would love it if someone could find his facebook page for me or his instagram

That guy should kill himself.

Let us all have your FBI contact details, or send them to me by private message. Case number etc. I'm preparing a report to and have a ton of evidence against him.

This just happened to me.
Google just granted me a vanity url.
When I do a search for my name and much to my surprise there I am on this site.
The web site found a post from an unhappy x in 2007 and the website posted it as if it was new. So of course I am surprised and click the remove name
and they want $500 to $2000 to remove my name.
That's blackmail, fraud and libel.
I did a google search. Found out that this is this websites mo.
And I did report it to the fbi.
And I'd feel I need to sue this person.

I sued Brian Scott Fitzgerald for $5, 000 and won. My case was heard in California on 15 August 2013. Brian did not show up, although the Judge deemed he was successfully served because his business partner alerted him about the hearing in an email that I was cc'd in, and Brian responded to that email, thus satisfying the Judge he had been notified. Brian however ignored my attempts to settle before the hearing, sent to that same email address.

The Judge considered fully the Communications Decency Act or CDA, 47 U.S.C 230 and concluded that because Brian himself had re-posted an untrue, libellous statement about me that he had pulled from another site, he was both the publisher and the host, and as such he was the one guilty of libel. There was also the discussion of blackmail and racketeering.

If anyone wants more info I'd be happy to provide it, as I imagine this will open the floodgates of other successful lawsuits.

Barbara Camwell Ness has been harassing and stalking Gary Stone and many others for years. She has MANY alias. Check her out on LiarCheaterRUs. Camwell puts her victims on this site and the DatingPsychos site. She lives in New York and has no life. She is overweight with diabetes and has no life outside of her computer. She states that she has every disease known to man. She picks her victims off of women's abuse sites. Always be careful when ever you are on line. Trust no one. Do not use your real name if at all possible. Do not give out any personal information to anyone. Camwell does not know how to let go. She goes on and on and on with harassing her victims.

The above poster from eopc is Barbara Camwell Ness. She was identified as a datingpsychos poster by the original owner of dp, and subsequently filed a complaint board post of her own, following mine on that site. Here she assumes this post is mine or maybe she knows it isnt, that there are others who have an issue with dp and she has decided to exploit that fact. She's notorious for this kind of behavior.

Barbabra
Camwell and your fellow trogladytes at EOPC, Elaine Smith, Michelle Jones - a lot has happened since you made this post. Firstly you had the above article censored at the hub, and so I've moved it here.

http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-malignant-power-of-anonymous_20.html

You may want to note where you published it before censoring it. Apparently the hub caved to your relenteless complaints and empty threats, the ones that spanned some three months. They eventually caved. But Bravenet did not and as you can see, because they didn't you posted them to the scam report as punishment (have you punished them here too?):

/link removed/

You may want to read my response to this nonsense
by the way, No Babs that's just a rhetorical suggestion. I know you've already seen it since January. And you operations have been paralyzed since. Not a bad thing either since EOPC is your facade cybercrime and exploitation is your real game.
On it' s face cyberpaths is datingpsyhos with a psychobabble face. It is actually run by 2 bit con artists.

/link removed/

This post (above) among other reasons, is why you moved your cyberpaths blog vigilante/scam site off of blogger to a malaysian server with a unique domain.

Its now called cyberpaths.org. (A scam site by any other name Barbara)

The other main reason is, you've sensed your liability since Mary Mcgrannhan was successfully sued by Mellisa Kester for the abusive
blog you and she made on her. Apparently Mary took the entire rap for Another Hollywood Cockroach. It was ordered down by a federal judge. How not fun.

For more insight into who fighter is,
and who fighters "Victims" are, it's probably best to search the name: " Barbara Camwell Ness"
One of the internet's most prodigious psychopaths.
A psychopath vigilante, "apparent" helper. is actually not a good thing. Its as bad all round an idea as datingspsychos. One of Babsa second homes, If she wasn't posted on, or posting there, she was playing the same game at filthy liar. Posting on many people, Yidwithlid, Larry Beeler, many others, many of Mary Mcgrannhans' personal enemies or her own. Right babs?

Since Babs
is in the pathological denial mode, lets look at how things blew up for her in June of 2011. As she went at her victims story for the second time (it was taken down in 2009, after being proved false, and ordered down by Scott Powers, down in agreement with my lawyer as well)
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=8379.30

Babs was so humiliated for how she was duped by these idiots, that she had to do it again as if she could MAKE their story real? She found out the hard way, that's impossible.

So that we can remain oriented here with respect to the posted Cassiopeia link: Guardian is Betsy Ashby, "Purple Haze" is Barbara Camwell Ness. (the nut who has showed up here.)

We can see from her history that embroiling herself in melodrama is what she does best.
Good luck with your new location for cyberpaths...Babs...But in terms of liability, it wouldn't matter if your ran your scams sites on the moon. YOU haven't moved. Babs and her crew of malignant narcissists are probably the first anonymous group that have successfully interfered with and destroyed a civil case, just to get vengeance for her alleged victims, Rick Kline and Elaine May Smith. (the one's she won't even name) They were reported for welfare fraud and IRS fraud, and apparently didn't like the consequences. Hence, their fairy tale. It wouldn't have been done had they not involved me. Babs you may notice, I'm doing something nobody else does, I'm using my real name and IP? Let me know when you or your "Victims" grow up and take responsibility. '

oth babs and her victims are in fact predatory victimize rs. In 2010 Ms Smith and Babs got together with Ally Byrd
of Soundclick and came up with the sexually harassing profile Auntie Audrey coded attack on me. There was a complaint against soundclick here for hosting it, which one day disappeared.. some months larter 2010.

mmm...one year later
babs and friends return and libel my name. Who got the complaint board post on soundclick down in 2010 Babs?
Wasn't it you, Scott Powers and you minions? Only the complaint board knows for sure. What did you say? See the scam report Bravenet for a clue.
For a menu of my issues with Babs and her "victims"
ridiculous hyperbole, read here: http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2013/05/this-is-ancillary-site-for-exposure-of.html

Thanks Babs for providing yet another
forum with which to warn people about
you and your sites.

- Gary Stone
Peabody.

I need to file a complaint as well my abusive ex has posted about me, on this dating psychos.com 7 years ago. I left him and moved on, little did I know he was busy on the Internet, posted blogs. lies humiliating, slander defamation of character. addresses. phone numbers .any info he could get his hands on.
my families phone number. and address they are elderly, they have been getting strange calls for the past few years because of this I'm sick over this he has harassed my friends through emails and found them through other web sites' my life" etc, because I have remarried and keep private, I don't do social network of any kind so he won't find me . so he goes after anyone who he knows would contact me.this is emotional draining it brought back a lot of horrible memories of his abuse. he is still tring to torment me, I emailed "Pat" is it? at dating psychos.com several times and asked to remove my profile, It as well leads viewers links to two other web sites my ex, has me displayed 44 pages! of lies and humiliation.Pat says" send me a donation and maybe I will consider to remove it "
Please help what can I do? can this site be shut down for good?

i just want to know the information to get my information removed. This guy Roger Waldman of aaa tree and stump in orange park florida posted info about me and my family and even posting information about my military service and where i was stationd, which could get me killed and my friends killed if in the wrong hands. PLZ help

The infamous Brain Fitzgerald HAS BEEN FOUND HE OWNS HASSMAN FITZGERALD

BRIAN FITZGERALD
 Hassman Fitzgerald Entertainment, Inc.  
11601 Dunstan Way, Suite 206  
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Phone: 310.471.4546
Fax: 720.247.7688 
Email: brian@cacadv.org

HIS ISP PROVIDER IN THE EVENT SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO SUBPOENA THEM IS (CODERO) 
Codero Legal Department
 8735 Rosehill Road, Suite 400 Lenexa, Kansas 66215
 Tel: [protected] / Fax: [protected] E-mail: legal@codero.com

THE FORMER OWNER JERAMEY JOHNSON MAY STILL BE IN CONNECTION TO DATINGPSYCHOS.COM

JERAMEY JOHNSON 
CELL PHONE # [protected]

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO REPORT THEM TO THE INTERNET CRIME DEPARTMENT 
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

Dating Psychos (www.datingpsychos.com) - The website is an interactive website and cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of information which their users may choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted to hold a website liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free speech as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all. See Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, "Making interactive computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the information available on the Internet.)

If you read the website, datingpsychos.com or actually send Pat an e-mail asking for your information to be removed, then you would clearly understand that you do not have to pay any money, however, I can appreciate the fact that all the money that does get donated, goes to a great charity.

Who has a problem with a domestic violence charity?

If you are considering suing a site like datingpsyhcos.com because of a profile which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that there is a federal law called the Communications Decency Act or "CDA", 47 U.S.C. § 230.

The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article discussing the history of the law can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on an “interactive website” such as Datingpsychos.com, the site itself cannot, in most cases, be held legally responsible for the posted material. Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

Because the profiles on datingpsychos.com are authored by users of the site, we cannot be legally regarded as the "publisher or speaker" of the profiles contained and hence we are not liable for profiles even if they contain false or inaccurate information. The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace and CraigsList – users who post information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not.

the ### who that: http://hubpages.com/hub/defamationdangers -- also writes this http://cybercrimerickkineelainemaysmith.blogspot.com

he's a psychotic idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about or who he's talking about. He's just pissed off that one of HIS victims caught him and told her story online: http://cyberpathlinks.blogspot.com/2008/10/gary-stone.html In fact, here's what his victims have to say about him:

THE ENERGIZER BUNNY OF ONLINE HARASSMENT
One might reasonably expect that the 3, 500 mile ocean between Gary Stone and his victim would prevent him from attacking her. But he hunts her down - one minute like a love-sick puppy and the next like a rabid wolf - and his aesthetically-challenged face pops up on every website she visits.
Stone has relentlessly stalked his victim on the Internet for over 3 years now. During that time he has wrongly and repeatedly reported her for "welfare fraud" to innumerable authorities, including the FBI, the DWP, US Immigration, Scotland Yard, the First Minister for Scotland, MI-6, and even MI-7... which exists only in James Bond movies!
When Stone found online links to his victim's involvement in a volunteer group in her local community, he emailed the leader of that group making false, outrageous accusations that she posed a danger to children, in a misguided attempt to blacken her name.
In recent weeks Stone found online photos of his victim making a success of her volunteer work; he then stalked each and every person photographed with her and spammed their various Facebook pages with his incessant drivel. Naturally none of these victims read beyond the first paragraph of Stone's word salad before clicking "Delete and Block this User." It provided mild amusement among the victims for about as long as it takes to wipe bird crap off your windshield.
As a former nurse, fired for harassment and insubordination, Stone chooses to describe himself as a "retired nurse" on Facebook. He uses his alleged nursing qualifications to prop up his ego, and has the audacity to email his victim's endocrinologist (a world-renowned Professor in his field) with advice on how to treat her as a patient! Stone relishes taunting his victim about her illness, and regularly provides his own wild diagnoses and recommendations about her medication.
In all of these attacks on his victim, Stone really seems to expect to be taken seriously, when in fact he is making a global laughing stock of himself. Stone's ramblings provide enough material for an entire conference on pathology, projection and pathos.
Instead of Stone announcing to the world (on Facebook) about his colonoscopy, he should try trephination and stick the camera where his brain should be. [The first image here refers to The Stone of Madness: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trepanning]
But Stone the Energizer Bunny knows no bounds! Wait until you hear what he does to his second victim...

"RAVINGS OF A LUNATIC"
One would expect after 3 years of no contact with Stone he would get the hint: Leave us alone.
Stone is nothing but an amusement now. Seeing Stone rant and rave to himself on facebook/blog sites, where he replies to his own replies of replies... it brings a slight wry smile to your face knowing that he can't get to anyone now, knowing that Stone is tearing himself apart from the inside out trying ever so desperately to get an audience... Someone to validate he is the victim... Someone to acknowledge he exists.
Even his one and probably only friend Kevin Carey takes the mickey out of Stone; what makes it funny is Stone is oblivious to it. However, as a leading UK psychologist has pointed out, there is no cure for Stone's illness, no pills, no surgery and, no amount of psychological analysis or psychiatric treatment can cure him. The only treatment for Stone, is not considered humane in these modern times and is akin to the treatment of a rabid dog. The only hope is for Stone to get a new victim, someone that offends his inverted morals or (his lack of) moral subconsciousness.
Stone's ranting would have you to believe that [victim 1] has "bilked" the government for £millions of welfare money while [victim 1] has sexual relationships with every married man in the UK & France, "up to 4 married men a day" - and sends Stone' subtle signals that only Stone can interpret', which Stone has labelled "gas lighting". Somehow Stone sees the "gas lighting" as proof that [victim 1] still has a desire to have a relationship with Stone. "Subtle signals" is all that Stone has, as Stone openly admits that he has not received any emails from [victim 1] since Feb 2008 when [victim 1], in a very polite manner, told Stone to piss off and leave her alone.
These "subtle signals" - or voices in Stone's head - have led to a combination of 4, 259 emails (to date) having been sent by Stone to [victim 1] and [victim 2] in the last 3 years: that's 3.8 emails a day, every day, day after day after day..., continuously for 3 years. That's not counting all the thousands if not tens of thousands of emails Stone sent to third parties trying to get [victim 1] and [victim 2] put in jail.
Not bad going for a blind man.
The voices in Stone's head have led him to believe that [victim 2] is the world's most prolific hacker. According to Stone [victim 2] is in control of Russian mobsters, has infiltrated government servers to remove evidence and has hacked the FBI (to plant evidence). Stone says that [victim 2] has complete control of the TOR proxy network and other proxy networks. Stone would have anyone that reads his crap believe that [victim 2] has complete control of his computer and internet connection, thus controlling all his email/blog/user accounts.
Stone phoned [victim 2]'s work with "evidence of hackery", Stone not knowing that [victim 2] had pre warned his employment of his cyberstalker. As Stone read off his list of evidence, he was on speaker phone, the whole office were muffling their laughter... Stone is now responsible for bringing humour to [victim 2]'s friends and a lot catch of phrases: "Don't do a Stone on me now", "Let's Stone-alize him/her" and "I'm going to get all Stone on your ###."
The "prolific evidence of hackery" that Stone has gathered trying to convince himself and the world, just so happens to coincide with a 14-month period that [victim 2] was being treated for a brain tumour - surgery, recovery and subsequent physiotherapy. Yessssssssss, of course, [victim 2] was in ICU with his laptop hacking Stone's computer on a daily basis.
Dealing with Stone is like walking barefoot in the park... in one horrific moment you realise you have stepped on dog faeces, you close your eyes preparing yourself to look down and, when you do, it just confirms that the essence of Stone has just squeezed up between your toes. As you clean Stone out from in between your toes you can't help but to laugh...
Yes, Stone is a lunatic; the wires in his brain are not crossed, they were just not connected to begin with. It brings a smile to one's face knowing that in the twilight of Stone's years the only purpose in his life is his obsessions. One could imagine Stone on his death-bed... "OHHHH the lights have dimmed, [victim 1] is sending a signal, " and "WAIT WAIT, [victim 2] is hacking my pillow case."
____________________

god forbid Stone ever gets a hold of your name - he will harass and harangue you for years no matter what you do, no matter how you disappear or block or get off the internet - he will keep on & on & on. Everyone is out to get him and he issue edits, write articles, change his blog 10000 times, send threaten you, your children & your friends... forever.

About Datingosychos.com...
I have problem on this web-site...I can understant that When people had problem, then they hate such people etc...BUT...one side, , We have to think HOW TO USE THIS WEB=SITE...
I checked something about this web-site.
1.We do not need to tell any information (only email address) for join this web-site.
2.We can write anything!
3.They protiect their reister only.
4.Even We use CONTATC US, They never mind.
Why I write comment by poor English...because I am so sorry, I am JApanese.
Japan..If someone wrote personal information, then first Site OWNER has to delete, , ,
but if they do not do, , second The responsibility hangs to the provider.
so, ..Provider has to do something...
BUT Amerca is different...mm...its GOOD FOR REAL PSYCHO!because...
I contacted PROVIDER...but WHEN ONLY I ASKED THEM about it, I NEED MY
ID card copy, .! BUT they did not tell any information about this web-site..
just I did provider, , but we can not do anything?>?
ITS Looks strange...
Don you think SO?

William, The owner of the site is Brian Fitzgerald http://brianfitzgerald.org/

He's a low level Extortionist/porn producer who also partners in www.hassmanfitzgerald.com

Contact me direct and I'll tell you how you can sign onto a lawsuit against him

how can u get urself removed from there

Am I the only one who thinks this is hilarious? Oh the Irony – This was posted by someone who says they want to fight against Anonymous Internet Defamation, but they post this defaming report anonymously on the internet.

So as to not be anonymous, I am Brian Fitzgerald and yes this is my website www.brianscottfitzgerald.com

And yes I am a Talent Manager and a Main Stream Producer and it is not hard to find me, but I do not own Egoist and if you follow the link it doesn’t even exist.

But let’s talk about who did post this report, not only did they do this anonymously, but they did it fraudulently. This was written by Bruce Taylor.

http://www.datingpsychos.com/psycho/Bruce%20J.-Taylor/4608
http://www.datingpsychos.com/psycho/James%20Bruce-Taylor/4475
http://www.datingpsychos.com/psycho/Bruce-Taylor/4435
http://dontdatehimgirl.com/posts/263747;

The same Bruce Taylor, that I have an active Restraining Order against and that is why he has to do this anonymously, but don’t worry the Police have this posting and others with his IP address.

He has continued to harass me via made up names/profiles like Michelle Newkirk mnewkirk68@yahoo.com, Danny Blue dannybleu79@gmail.com, NN - scooter@hotmail.com and the latest is Shelly Mitchell who friended all my facebook friends and then started to defame me, but it was just Bruce again and the profile was deleted.

And now for the website Dating Psychos (www.datingpsychos.com) - The website is an interactive website and cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of information which their users may choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted to hold a website liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free speech as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all. See Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, "Making interactive computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the information available on the Internet.)

If you read the website, datingpsychos.com or actually send Pat an e-mail asking for your information to be removed, then you would clearly understand that you do not have to pay any money, however, I can appreciate the fact that all the money that does get donated, goes to a great charity.
Who has a problem with a domestic violence charity?
If you are considering suing a site like datingpsyhcos.com because of a profile which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that there is a federal law called the Communications Decency Act or "CDA", 47 U.S.C. § 230.

The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article discussing the history of the law can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on an “interactive website” such as Datingpsychos.com, the site itself cannot, in most cases, be held legally responsible for the posted material. Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

Because the profiles on datingpsychos.com are authored by users of the site, we cannot be legally regarded as the "publisher or speaker" of the profiles contained and hence we are not liable for profiles even if they contain false or inaccurate information. The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace and CraigsList – users who post information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not.