|
|
Share with Others
|
Recently Discussed Complaints
2. (16 mins ago)ASUSProduct warranty service 5. (28 mins ago)FEX EXDELIVERY
Consumer Tips & Tricks
|
Latest News & Stories
Latest Questions
|
|
|
|
urljet.com Complaints & Reviews - Violation of their own rules |
| urljet.com Contacts & Informations |
urljet.com |
|
|
|
|
Violation of their own rules
Complaint Rating: 
|
As a hosting company urljet.com are in violation of their own rules by allowing one of their websites to openly display a stolen photograph of me in an attempt to stalk and harass me.
Their OWN rues prohibit this, but despite repeated abuse reports, they do not seem competent enough to police their OWN rules. And actually enforce them. Why is this I wonder. are they protecting someone at the expense of their own integrity?
One does wonder what they would really be like if a client of theirs had a problem, if they are unable to enforce their own terms of service.
The promotional advertising they do counts for nothing, if a Client cannot rely on them doing the right thing.
Many times, it is how an organization responds to valid complaints that show whether they are genuine. I am sure that there are many other hosting companies that actually do the right thing, but alas it seems that urljet do not fall into that category.
|
Comments |
Australia |
Hosting & Web Design |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
Sort by:
Date |
Rating
|
|
|
|
URLJet takes copyright notice seriously.
When this gentleman contacted us it was from an unidentified gmail address and about a photo of a person used in an avatar. He wanted it removed. There was NO supporting information or DMCA request, nor was he willing to provide any.
Our position is that we will comply with any Legal request. However, as this gentleman was informed... We cannot not serve as judge an jury for an anonymous email that provides no means of verification and puts us in the position of making a decision on something we have no knowledge of, other than an anonymous email.
|
|
|
I contacted urljet.com from a valid email address and answered politely the reply from urljet.com offering proof of my claim. However urljet stopped replying to me for reasons of their own. So the statement " nor was he willing to provide any" is incorrect.
Here is a copy of my reply to urljet.com=
"Your acceptable use policy states, "The following constitute violations
"Threats and unlawful conduct : Use of our service to transmit any
material (by e-mail, uploading, posting or otherwise) that threatens or
encourages bodily harm or destruction of any life, limb or property. Use
of our services to transmit any material (by e-mail, uploading, posting
or otherwise) that harasses another."
I am being harassed, and request that you take action relevant to your
policy to stop the person from harassing me by using your service.
Under the Fraud section it states:" Fraud : Use of our service to
make fraudulent offers to sell or buy products, items, or services,
or to advance any type of financial scam such as "pyramid schemes, "
"ponzi schemes, " and "chain letters." Adding, removing or modifying
identifying network header information in an effort to deceive or
mislead is prohibited. Attempting to impersonate any person by using
forged headers or other identifying information is prohibited. The
use of anonymous re-mailers or nicknames does not constitute
impersonation. Involves a knowing misrepresentation or misleading
statement, writing or activity made with the intent that the person
receiving it will act upon it."
=Attempting to impersonate any person by using forged headers or
other identifying information is prohibited" I am being
impersonated, and my stolen photograph is being used on your service
to do this.
I am willing to send you other photographs of me that were part of the
set, where the stolen photograph was taken from. This will prove that
it is I in the photograph that is being used without my permission. The
impostor cannot send them to you as he only has the one as far as I am
aware.
To sum up, I am being harassed by one of your clients using your
service to stalk and harass me. As this falls under abuse of your AUP
policy, I respectfully request that you take appropriate action to stop
this abuse of your TOS and AUP. For your necessary action. Thank you."
My photograph that was stolen from my PC by a hacker is being used along with my details to harass me in violation of the urljet rules. Why do urljet not enforce their own rules and now post incorrect information to avoid doing so?
|
|
|
I contacted urljet.com from a valid email address and answered politely the reply from urljet.com offering proof of my claim. However urljet stopped replying to me for reasons of their own. So the statement " nor was he willing to provide any" is incorrect.
Here is a copy of my reply to urljet.com=
"Your acceptable use policy states, "The following constitute violations
"Threats and unlawful conduct : Use of our service to transmit any
material (by e-mail, uploading, posting or otherwise) that threatens or
encourages bodily harm or destruction of any life, limb or property. Use
of our services to transmit any material (by e-mail, uploading, posting
or otherwise) that harasses another."
I am being harassed, and request that you take action relevant to your
policy to stop the person from harassing me by using your service.
Under the Fraud section it states:" Fraud : Use of our service to
make fraudulent offers to sell or buy products, items, or services,
or to advance any type of financial scam such as "pyramid schemes, "
"ponzi schemes, " and "chain letters." Adding, removing or modifying
identifying network header information in an effort to deceive or
mislead is prohibited. Attempting to impersonate any person by using
forged headers or other identifying information is prohibited. The
use of anonymous re-mailers or nicknames does not constitute
impersonation. Involves a knowing misrepresentation or misleading
statement, writing or activity made with the intent that the person
receiving it will act upon it."
=Attempting to impersonate any person by using forged headers or
other identifying information is prohibited" I am being
impersonated, and my stolen photograph is being used on your service
to do this.
I am willing to send you other photographs of me that were part of the
set, where the stolen photograph was taken from. This will prove that
it is I in the photograph that is being used without my permission. The
impostor cannot send them to you as he only has the one as far as I am
aware.
To sum up, I am being harassed by one of your clients using your
service to stalk and harass me. As this falls under abuse of your AUP
policy, I respectfully request that you take appropriate action to stop
this abuse of your TOS and AUP. For your necessary action. Thank you."
My photograph that was stolen from my PC by a hacker is being used along with my details to harass me in violation of the urljet rules. Why do urljet not enforce their own rules and now post incorrect information to avoid doing so?
|
|
|
|
I have so many questions about this. How are you being harassed? Are there threatening posts somewhere? How did a hacker get access to your computer in the first place? And a single photo was stolen? This is a very unlikely scenario. You say there are other photos in the series. Have they also been used online by someone too? Just this fact (if it is a fact) makes me suspicious since a hacker is not likely to be interested in a single photo of you. It just isn't plausible. Hackers are interested in your bank account, credit cards, etc. Why would a hacker get into your machine and steal one photo?
|
|
|
@creamskirt. Thank you for your reply, I will try to answer your questions to the best of my ability.
I am being harassed by the hacker using my photograph to impersonate me, by setting up fake accounts and posting derogatory comments about me while pretending that the comments were made by me. He has posted many lies about me while pretending to be me, so that people would think it was I making the comments.
The hacker put a keylogger on my PC and my AV programs did not stop it.
A single photo was stolen because, out of the set it was the only one that was stored on my PC.
None of the other photos have been used anywhere as they were not on my pc for the hacker to steal,
The hacker is one of the hackers and scammers that I exposed, so they decided to start a smear campaign to try to stop me from exposing them.
I am part of some anti-fraud sites and we have helped closed down many of their scam websites, thereby reducing their illegal income, as retaliation, every time we close more of their scam websites, they increase their attacks on me to try to stop me.
Hackers hack PC's for many reasons, yes, in most cases it is for direct monetary gain, but some do it to be able to threated or harass others with the information they have gained.
The hacker also stole information, but was only able to steal one photo as it was the only one there.
|
|
|
|
This is to inform general public, and especially urljet staff, that Mr Alan James Watson, aka Big Al, aka De Master Yoda, has been under the investigation of relevant authorities in at least 4 countries: Australia, New Zealand, United States and Canada, for allegedly being a member of child porn ring. Other of his criminal activities are unknown to us at this point in time, but further investigation will reveal more, we suspect. All individuals in touch with Mr Watson are adviced to be very careful. He is extremely dangerous. We suspect that he carries a concealed weapons when not at home. Anyone with any info on his illegal and criminal activities is adviced to contact the nearest police station. Do not, under any circumstances, make any attempt to apprehend mr Watson by yourself.
|
|
|
The false post by the so called "Col. James Z. Fosset" is typical of the lies that the impostor has been posting.
The impostor really gets upset when I manage to close down some of the scam websites that he makes, and so he resorts to blatant lies and derogatory comments like this. The person who is posting as Alan James Watson is Chandra Sekhar Sathyadas who is an IT engineer for the Kerala public works department.
I call on urljet.com to take action against this guy and remove the stolen photograph of me that he is using to defame me on Juot .net.
Anyone of normal intelligence can now see what this hacker is capable of.
|
|
|
@creamskirt. Thank you for your post. I will answer your questions t the besat of my ability.
The latest post by the so called Col. James Z. Fosset shows more than I could ever describe how I am being harassed. The post is totally false and provides no proof as there is none to prove any of this fake post.
The hacker placed a Keylogger on my pc that got past my AV programs at the time.
I have other photos in the set, but there was only one that I had put on my PC, so the hacker could only steal the one. He did however steal other data.
Yes, hackers usually go after things that can make them money. But some do it for information that they can use for other purposes.
So the answer to your question of why the hacker only stole one photo is that only one was stored on my PC as far as I can recall.
|
|
|
Mr Watson,
There is no negotiations with THE LAW. Being apprehended so many times for good reasons, you should know that. You can run (barely, at your age), but you can't hide. Can you explain to the good people of this board, what have you been doing with young boys far below the age of consent? We WILL track you down, and we WILL apprehend you, don't worry about that.
|
|
|
This is where to find that photo our CP crank is complaining about: http://roninclean.blogspot.com/
And the photo itself is attached below:
|
|
|
|
To "Victim of a host company": your problems sound bigger than just the urljet policies. As suggested, you should file a DMCA request if you want your picture removed. urljet has no way of knowing who is who in this situation otherwise. Surely you see how anyone could come along and make any kind of claim about someone, as is being done above about you.
|
|
|
Is the the photo in question?
|
|
|
@creamskirt. I have sent a DMCA report to both urljet.com and Juot.net. The blog that is mentioned where I take it you got the photo from, was taken over by the hacker (remember I said that he had stolen other things) He stole the password to my blog and altered the comments and also posted the photo on there. The comments on there and the photo are NOT authorized nor posted by me.
I have NEVER posted the photo on the internet and I have NEVER given anyone permission to use it, I would appreciate you removing my illegally obtained photo as no one has my permission to use it.
As my original post and subsequent ones are concerned about the illegal use of my Photograph, I am surprised to see you use it without my permission. Please remove it, thank you.
|
|
|
The poster Col. James Z. Fosset cannot be found with a google search, as he is a made up name.
He seems to be saying that a person called Alan James Watson is guilty of totally unsubstantiated "crimes"
As my name is NOT Alan James Watson and I have NEVER used that name anywhere on the internet, he seems to be in need of some professional help for his delusions. The only persons who have used that name as far as I am aware, are people who actually own that name and Chandra Sekhar Sathyadas who uses it a lot, along with MY illegally obtained photograph.
Col. James Z. Fosset says=
"Mr Watson,
There is no negotiations with THE LAW." Is he breaking the law, by now impersonating a lawyer?
|
|
|
Dear victim of a hosting company, you need to remove that photo from imageshack as well.
It can be found at http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/24/bigal1uj3.jpg - whoever uploaded that image to imageshack did so after accepting their terms, which gives them the absolute permission to distribute it to whoever has the link to it.
Send a DMCA request to imageshack, and don't go diddling little kiddies or sharing their pictures in future.
|
|
|
Hello, I am Joe the Admin of the forum the original poster is complaining about. He uses the name Alan James Watson but he admits this is a fake name he uses to hide his real identity- basically he wants to remain anonymous. This has been going on over 5 years. I tell him each time he can file a valid DMCA complaint and I will remove the image. URLJet told him the same thing. However for DMCA to be valid the copyright holder must sign the complaint, affirm they are the true copyright holder, and provide an address as well. "Alan James Watson" - a known fake name cannot make a valid DMCA complaint. Anonymous users do not get to dictate what pictures may or may nor be online. Also Alan James Watson originally denied this photo was of him. He changed his story after he was banned from my site- not I am sure he is complaining just to "get back" at me for banning him.
I have no knowledge who posted about child porn charges but I seriously doubt that to be true. To me "Alan James Watson" AKA Big Al is a want-to-be internet vigilante, possible troll or loon, but I have no reason to suspect he has anything to do with child porn. I find that post in poor taste.
|
|
|
|
Big AL has threatened my family in a recent email to me- he has found names of close family members of mine. He is an Internet Stalker and I encourage NO ONE to email him, talk to him, or have any communication with him. I first talked to Big Al hoping I could help him but he has turned on me like he will you. Do not make the same mistakes I made- avoid the man known as Big Al at all costs.
|
|
|
That's unfortunate. The man's story is a little strange (hackers stole his picture? I don't think so) I did some research and found a blog he writes: http://cashbaiting-darkarts-volksanctum.blogspot.com/
Definitely something more going on with him, he seems to have some serious problems. That blog is full of weird and unpleasant stuff, including some about urljet, so it's definitely the same guy.
|
|
|
It is true they told me to file a proper DMCA complaint, request, but I haven't done that, nor will I. I just want people to do what I say. Just do it! I don't need to go through proper channels. DO WHAT I SAY NOW!!!1!!1!
|
|
|
@BirdOPrey5. Again you post lies. I am NOT Alan James Watson as I have told you many times.
I have NEVER threatened you. The names I gave you are on the internet in public and I never threatened you with them.
I did mention that my oipinion is that you may be in violation of the safe harbour rules and could lose any protection against law suits. As you have been officially notified that the photo is mine and is being used without my permission and you have acknowledged receiving that notification.
" I first talked to Big Al hoping I could help him but he has turned on me like he will you. "
More lies from Joe. Many times I have asked to talk to you to settle this matter but you refused.
Lets look at A THREAT that you issued to me here is a copy of YOUR threat!
"You f*** with my family Al and your info goes VIRAL. " I never threatened your family I did mention a few names .
I have made a copy of your threat for the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Videos
|
Latest Groups
|
Today's Mess-Up Photo
|
|
|
|
|