|
|
Recently Discussed Complaints
5. (31 mins ago)1st Prom DressPaid extra money for a dress to meet dead line, that was not complete.
Consumer Tips & Tricks
|
Latest News & Stories
Latest Questions
|
|
|
Telepacific Communications, Marin County, California Complaints & Reviews - Disconnect/Billing |
| Review all Telepacific Communications, Marin County, California complaints |
Telepacific Communications |
|
|
|
|
|
Disconnect/Billing
Complaint Rating: 
Company information: Marin County, California United States
|
|
|
We recently had a terrible experience with Telepacific that I want to warn you about. We notified them on May 19, 2009 that we wanted to disconnect our service with them. We were moving offices, and we did not want to use their service at our new location. On May 28, 2009, we received email confirmation from them (from their disconnect department) that our account would be disconnected on June 19, 2009, which would also be our billing end-date. I should note that up to this point we had had no issues with them.
As part of our move process, we issued a port request for a single fax number, and this is where the fun began. On the billing end-date (6/19/09), they denied the port request. Their rationale was that I was not an authorized user on the account. Huh? I opened up the account for my company, and I was the ONLY user authorized on the account.
So, how could they deny the port request? Well, after doing some research, it turns out that this is a common Telepacific practice. They block the initial port request to extend the billing period. And, as anyone who has tried to port a number knows, it often takes 30 days (or more) to port a number, so when they block the first request, they know that they've got another thirty days (or more) to bill you. If you don't believe me, take a look at this: http://www.topix.com/forum/city/los-angeles-ca/TPRSG5C1EGDTDEPUE
But, it gets better. So, the port request is resubmitted, and Telepacific provides a new port date of July 30, 2009. Well, apparently the port is approved on that date, BUT they decide not to release the number until August 12, 2009. So, now, they've not only blocked the first port request to extend billing, but they've now delayed the release of the number for nearly two more weeks to continue running up the service charges.
During the period from June 19 onward, they billed us twice (we were on autopay so they hit our credit card!), with total charges of more than $2, 100.00. As you can imagine, we were not standing by idly during this period. In fact, we (I) made more than 12 phone calls to the customer service department, the billing department, the porting department, the disconnect department...in other words, anyone who would listen. And, each time I called, two things happened: 1) the person from Telepacific indicated that it was "some other department's responsibility (i.e. billing said it was disconnect, disconnect said it was porting, etc.) to resolve the problem"; and 2) they said that they would have someone call me back with a solution. Well, each time, no one called me back. I even tried the "executive escalation" numbers that Telepacific provided on its website. I guess even the executives don't want to take responsibility for what their company does...
In fairness to Telepacific, I doubt that they are the only carrier that pulls these types of stunts, but you should be forewarned that they (or any other carrier) may try to pull the same stunt with you. Unfortunately, I don't know what to recommend to avoid this, since it was a dishonest and deliberate act on the part of Telepacific.
I have subsequently contacted the PUC to file a complaint and my credit card company to dispute the charges. We'll see what happens from here, but I can assure you that we'll never be a Telepacific customer again.
|
Comments |
United States |
Telecommunications |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
Sort by:
Date |
Rating
|
|
|
|
I have been trying to disconnect service with Telepacific since August...now here we are in mid-October...We have found them to be completely unreponsive and obstructive to our requests to shut off service...I guess it behoves a seemingly desperate company to hold on to their final meal for as long as possible!
After 8 years on the service...we couldn't get them to port our numbers either...they rejected every request and couldn't give an adequate reason as to why!
At first I thought they were just incompetent or understaffed...now I believe the delays are systematic...if a class action suit were to come up...I'd be happy to volunteer! |
|
|
| i have same problem with telepacific too. i try to port out the number from telepacific to vonage, everytime they decline our request to port out. its been taking over a month now. what should i do? |
|
|
Yea, telepacific.com, telepacific.net they are spammers and scammers. The company behind, is Internap.
In my case they are sending spam and no opt-out. I could provide spam messages I got from them over the past 2 years.
Attempts to publish to wikipedia about this of course are "censored" by the cartel they run. |
|
|
| TelePacific is a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier and does not condone or allow the use of SPAM email. If you have experienced a problem recieving SPAM from TelePacific or a domain hosted by TelePacific, please report the abuse by calling the Internet Abuse Complaints line at 877-702-2873. |
|
|
pamela7476, telepacific.net is spam company without opt-out. I am not calling spammers.
I report every email that comes to me or to my clients servers to spamcop.net. The latest spam email from telepacific was reported today:
extrovert4.murgent.com (extrovert4.murgent.com [::ffff:70.42.212.21])
As far I am I know, spam reports sent to abuse@telepacific.net are ignored and deleted. |
|
|
| We had the same experience when we ended our contract with Telepacific. They delayed the date of disconnect and caused me to pay way more time than I actually used plus a HUGE contract fee on top of that that I never paid and am now going to court over. Anyone have any advice for small claims court over the contract fee? I had asked repeatedly what the fees would be for ending service at the time my business had to relocate and never once did they mention a fee related to the contract. I even tried talking to the head of the company and he said he would research the matter and get back to us then never did and the bills just kept coming. |
|
|
| And in addition to that I had been with the company by default when they bought out Arrival who I started with from ground zero. They took it over and my contract started over. Then I had to switch service because they said they wouldn't be able to change our service over quick enough. It would have taken us 45 days to get internet, phone and fax up and running again. Now I am with ATT because of that. |
|
|
| I signed up with Mpower (which is now Telepacific) back in 2006 with a 3 yr contract. Then in Feb 2009, I reniewed my contract for another 2 yrs (till Feb 2011). And guess what.. Another company offered me a better rate and faster internet and Telepacific Rep can not match the new rate I am getting. So I swithced to a new provider towards the end of March 2011. And to my surprise, Telepacific told me that there is a $50 disconnect fee (or fee change). What a bunch of belony..when I signed the contract with them, there is no such thing mentioned on the contract under the terms and services...then they claimed they made the changes on the terms and conditions which I am not aware of. For all Telepacific customers, I just want to let you know that even if you fulfill your contract with them, there will be a $50 disconnect fee no matter what!!! After being a customer of Telepacific for a little over 5 years. |
|
|
| After switching everything from Cox to Telepacific because of 'supposedly' better rates around the same time of this original complaint, we learned that the contract didn't include all of our numbers — so right off the bat, we were bumped to a higher rate. Then, nothing worked - phonelines and Internet were down on several occaisons (24 hours is apparently within 'normal' per their agreement with no compensation-huh?). We opened at least 10 tickets with only one response to our tech. Finally after three months, we terminated our agreement for lack of performance and were hit with a contract balance bill in the multiple thousands, and like this complaint - they wouldn't port numbers back. Now two years later, they are coming back to us for the "early termination" . Telepacific is possibly the worst company we've ever dealt with - it cost us not only the roll over twice (from Cox to TP, back to Cox), but headache upon headache, and chaos with our clients. Telepacific has no customer service, no acknowledgement, no attempt to right the wrongs even when given the opportunity. The straw that broke the camel's back? When it took 14 hours to download an 8kb file (yes, that's smaller than a text message) and they still wouldn't acknowledge the upload/download times were malfunctioning — and ditto what everyone wrote - same issues — |
|
|
| I had someone hacker from 209.58.228.219 (Telepacific IP range 209.58.228.216-209.58.228.223) register a soft phone by spoofing my IP address and attempted to make several long-distance calls. After searching Google I discover that there were many such complains and figured that it would be more problematic to complain, as they might pass along my email to a spamer. |
|
|
|
|
Videos
|
Latest Groups
|
Today's Mess-Up Photo
|
|
|