The most trusted and popular consumer complaints website
Connect With: Connect with Yahoo Connect with Google Connect with Twitter Connect with LinkedIn

Recently Discussed Complaints

2. (10 mins ago)
Nomorerack.com
You will never get your refund
3. (23 mins ago)
WWW.AUTOKITSHOP.WS
Fraudulent Debit Charge
4. (33 mins ago)
Ironman Fitness
Awful company

Consumer Tips & Tricks

Latest News & Stories

Latest Questions

VoteAndDate.com

Dr. David Kleiman Complaints & Reviews - Dr David Kleiman Public Reprimand for Malpractice

Review all Dr. David Kleiman complaints

Dr. David Kleiman

Posted: 2010-02-23 by   earldobson
Dr David Kleiman Public Reprimand for Malpractice
Complaint Rating:  0 % with 0 votes
Company information:
Dr. David Kleiman
United States
2. Respondent is certified by the American Board of Medical Specialties in ophthalmology.

3. Respondent is forty-six (46) years of age.

4. Respondent has been licensed to practice by the Board for approximately twenty (20) years.

5. In 1988, Responded failed to obtain an x-ray in regard to patient N.Y. to detect the possibility of a foreign metal object.

6. Patient N.Y. had faint evidence of rust at the time Respondent performed the initial examination, but elected not to perform an x-ray given the quietness of the eye. Respondent’s index of suspicion was also low given the lapse of time between the injury and the time of his examination 5 days later after evaluation by a previous physician.

7. Patient R.B. was examined by Respondent for trauma associated with a pencil strike to the eye.

8. Respondent administered a retrobulbar anesthesia by injection on patient R.B. that resulted in orbital hemorrhage and severe damage to the eye.

9. Respondent was aware at the time of examination that patient R.B. had a possible paternal history of Von Willebrand’s disease. Given his concern for the risk of infection however, and the fact that the patient’s father had two previous surgeries without complications, Respondent proceeded with the retrobulbar anesthesia prior to initiating clotting factor studies.

10. Respondent failed to assemble properly the equipment to perform a laser keratotomy and the resulting procedure on patient M.M. resulted in a corneal laceration and visual damage.

11. Respondent admits the improper assembly was the result of being tired and overworked.

Dr. David Kleiman Dr. David Kleiman Dr. David Kleiman Dr. David Kleiman Dr. David Kleiman

Comments United States Health & Beauty
Share with others:   Digg it!  Del.ici.ous  Yahoo My Web  Share on Twitter  Facebook My Web
Was the above complaint useful to you?    

Post your Comment

Please check text spelling before submitting a comment
Your attitude towards ComplaintAgree Neutral Disagree
Comment text
Spell Check
Attach photos (optional)

Videos

Email Phishing Scam

Latest Groups

Today's Mess-Up Photo


RSS Feed
 
     
 

Login

Email:
Password:

Forgot your password?