|
|
Recently Discussed Complaints
Consumer Tips & Tricks
Worst rating
|
|
|
Subjects of Wide Speculation
3. Wal-Mart (45) does not follow us constitution, embarassed me. 8. USPS (23) They lost my package, and don't care! Latest News & Stories
Stay Away
Latest Questions
|
|
|
Dating Psychos (dot) com Complaints - J-Dog (owner) |
| Review all Dating Psychos (dot) com complaints |
Dating Psychos (dot) com |
| Posted: 2009-03-20 by |
 | ANON |
|
|
|
|
|
J-Dog (owner)
Complaint Rating: 
Company information:
Dating Psychos (dot) com
United States
datingpsychos.com
JDog - for the simple fee of $25 will not only remove your posting (which is extortion as he will only take money, not even a court order) but HE WILL GIVE THE NAME OF THE ALLEGED POSTER & THEIR IP NUMBER TO WHOEVER PAYS HIM THIS $25.
This is clear violation of the standards of his own webhost:
Domains by Proxy will not produce the content of e-mail, as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2701 et seq., prohibits an electronic communications service provider from producing the contents of electronic communications, even pursuant to subpoena or court order, except in limited circumstances. Domains by Proxy 's e-mail servers do not retain deleted or sent e-mail. However, deleted e-mail may be recoverable from back-up servers for a period of up to thirty (30) days.
We recently learned he sold the ip and email address of an INNOCENT PERSON who had their computer hacked 6 months ago and then their hotmail address information sold to Nigerian scammers -- to a known pathological and cyberharasser who is currently being investigated by the DOJ and FBI. It appears this innocent person is just finding out now their accounts were used for things they have no idea about.
Now this cyberharasser is relentlessly harassing an innocent person who doesn't even know who he is... because JDog was more than willing to give up information for a few dollars.
Interesting that he hides behind a proxy protected place like GoDaddy.
JDog should be censured and DatingPsychos removed from the web.
J-Dog@resentment.org
|
 Comments |
 United States |
 Internet Services |
|
|
|
Comments |
Sort by:
 Date |
Rating
|
|
|
|
| http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/httpdatingpsychoscom-c159240.html |
|
|
| http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/datingpsychoscom-c180634.html |
|
|
Owner of www.datingpsychos.com and www.resentment.org is
JEREMY JOHNSON |
|
|
| please contact us immediately. we are trying to build a case on this guy. mycrimlaw@live.com |
|
|
| the owner of datingpsychos.com is http://brianfitzgerald.org/?blog=2&paged=5 |
|
|
| This is Brian Fitzgerald a la http://brianfitzgerald.org/ and I do not own the website. I am a business broker and was helping the current owner try to sell the site. |
|
|
JDog was asked by an Arizona lawyer if he was still the owner of datingpsychos.com and he said "NO, I sold that site in Nov"
The person that bought it is trying to say he is just the broker but on the site Flippa you can see that he bought it for $5, 000 on Nov 25th http://flippa.com/auctions/78533/DatingPsychos-com--Well-Established-niche-dating-site. The old owner Jdogg confirmed that he sold the site on Nov 25th.
He is currently trying to sell the site for $6, 500 on Flippa.com http://flippa.com/auctions/87664/DatingPsychos-com-Well-Established-niche-Reputation-Management-Site
We are spearheading a class action lawsuit against Brian Fitzgerald and datingpsychos.com and currently have people from Ca, Az and Ill helping us.
If you have been harmed by this man or this website in any way please contact me asap |
|
|
(www.datingpsychos.com) - The website is an interactive website and cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of information which their users may choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted to hold a website liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free speech as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all. See Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, "Making interactive computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the information available on the Internet.)
If you read the website, datingpsychos.com or actually send Pat or whoever is running the site an e-mail asking for your information to be removed, then you would clearly understand that you do not have to pay any money, however, I can appreciate the fact that all the money that does get donated, goes to a great charity.
Who has a problem with a domestic violence charity?
If you are considering suing a site like datingpsyhcos.com because of a profile which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that there is a federal law called the Communications Decency Act or "CDA", 47 U.S.C. § 230.
The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article discussing the history of the law can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on an “interactive website” such as Datingpsychos.com, the site itself cannot, in most cases, be held legally responsible for the posted material. Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
Because the profiles on datingpsychos.com are authored by users of the site, we cannot be legally regarded as the "publisher or speaker" of the profiles contained and hence we are not liable for profiles even if they contain false or inaccurate information. The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace and CraigsList – users who post information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not. |
|
|
(www.datingpsychos.com) - The website is an interactive website and cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of information which their users may choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted to hold a website liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free speech as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all. See Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, "Making interactive computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the information available on the Internet.)
If you read the website, datingpsychos.com or actually send Pat or whoever is running the site an e-mail asking for your information to be removed, then you would clearly understand that you do not have to pay any money, however, I can appreciate the fact that all the money that does get donated, goes to a great charity.
Who has a problem with a domestic violence charity?
If you are considering suing a site like datingpsyhcos.com because of a profile which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that there is a federal law called the Communications Decency Act or "CDA", 47 U.S.C. § 230.
The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article discussing the history of the law can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on an “interactive website” such as Datingpsychos.com, the site itself cannot, in most cases, be held legally responsible for the posted material. Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
Because the profiles on datingpsychos.com are authored by users of the site, we cannot be legally regarded as the "publisher or speaker" of the profiles contained and hence we are not liable for profiles even if they contain false or inaccurate information. The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace and CraigsList – users who post information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not. |
|
|
Jeremy Johnson and/or Brian Fitzgerald...
What you have to realize about guys like this is that these are the guys that you teased in school and they grew up to have NO self esteem so they create sites like this so they can feel supeior by deflecting the the ridicule off of them and on to others. hahaha this is some funny shit. I GUARANTEE you that these two goofballs fit into these categories.
1. Never got laid in high school
2. Have little dicks
3. Were the short, fat, unathletic kids that got picked last for every team.
4. Have a hard time dealing with homosexual feelings that consume a large part of thier lives and it scares the crap out of them.
Ask any psychologist and they'll tell you that I am right about thiS.
the problem is if these two goofs continue to be dumped by their women and continue to under achieve and continue to struggle with homosexual feelings they will graduate to serial killing and that is a very scary possibilty. When they both reach 40 years old the likelihood of that increases greatly.
the moral of this is STOP teasing the short, fat, unathletic dorks at school and treat everyone equal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Videos
|
Latest Groups
|
Today's Mess-Up Photo
|
Categories
|
Smile upon Life :)
|
|
|
2009-03-20 by 
102 days ago by 
67 days ago by 
